) 河北师范大学教育学院, 石家庄 050024
收稿日期:2019-04-02出版日期:2020-02-25发布日期:2019-12-24通讯作者:鲁忠义E-mail:zhongyilu@126.com基金资助:* 河北省社会科学基金项目(HB18JY042)Spatial iconicity of moral concepts: Co-dependence of linguistic and embodied symbols
WANG Hanlin, JIANG Zeliang, FENG Xiaohui, LU Zhongyi() College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
Received:2019-04-02Online:2020-02-25Published:2019-12-24Contact:LU Zhongyi E-mail:zhongyilu@126.com摘要/Abstract
摘要： 采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术探讨抽象道德概念的空间形象性效应, 以及语言因素和具身因素对该效应的影响机制及其加工进程。实验1检验词对空间位置对道德词对语义判断(反义程度)所产生的影响, 结果表明不符合空间形象性呈现条件(即道德-下, 不道德-上)诱发了较大的N400, 并且词对语义判断的反应时较长; 实验2检验词对语义的反义程度对道德词对空间形象性判断所产生的影响, 结果表明语义无关词对诱发了较大的N200和N700, 并且词对空间形象性判断的反应时较长。研究结果表明, 抽象道德概念的加工能够表现出空间形象性效应, 该效应由语言因素和具身因素共同塑造, 前者在概念加工过程中优先被激活并发挥持久影响, 后者仅在概念加工的中期发挥作用。
图/表 5
图1实验1流程图
图1实验1流程图表1语义相反道德词对所诱发的三个ERP成分的方差分析
| 变异源 | N200 | N400 | N700 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | η2p | F | p | η2p | F | p | η2p | |
| 呈现方式(A) | 0.56 | n.s. | 5.19 | 0.032 | 0.17 | 2.41 | n.s. | ||
| 电极位置(B) | 81.05 | < 0.001 | 0.76 | 4.23 | 0.019 | 0.15 | 6.96 | 0.003 | 0.22 |
| A×B | 0.34 | n.s. | 0.11 | n.s. | 0.08 | n.s. | |||
表1语义相反道德词对所诱发的三个ERP成分的方差分析
| 变异源 | N200 | N400 | N700 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | η2p | F | p | η2p | F | p | η2p | |
| 呈现方式(A) | 0.56 | n.s. | 5.19 | 0.032 | 0.17 | 2.41 | n.s. | ||
| 电极位置(B) | 81.05 | < 0.001 | 0.76 | 4.23 | 0.019 | 0.15 | 6.96 | 0.003 | 0.22 |
| A×B | 0.34 | n.s. | 0.11 | n.s. | 0.08 | n.s. | |||
图2语义相反道德词对在两种呈现方式下所诱发的ERPs。时间窗为：红色区域N200, 蓝色区域N400, 绿色区域N700。
图2语义相反道德词对在两种呈现方式下所诱发的ERPs。时间窗为：红色区域N200, 蓝色区域N400, 绿色区域N700。表2与空间形象性相一致的位置条件下词对所诱发的三个ERP成分的方差分析
| 变异源 | N200 | N400 | N700 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | η2p | F | p | η2p | F | P | η2p | |
| 反义程度(A) | 5.96 | 0.022 | 0.19 | 1.57 | n.s. | 11.53 | 0.002 | 0.31 | |
| 电极位置(B) | 61.67 | < 0.001 | 0.70 | 3.36 | n.s. | 5.95 | 0.009 | 0.19 | |
| A×B | 1.19 | n.s. | 0.11 | n.s. | 2.31 | n.s. | |||
表2与空间形象性相一致的位置条件下词对所诱发的三个ERP成分的方差分析
| 变异源 | N200 | N400 | N700 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | p | η2p | F | p | η2p | F | P | η2p | |
| 反义程度(A) | 5.96 | 0.022 | 0.19 | 1.57 | n.s. | 11.53 | 0.002 | 0.31 | |
| 电极位置(B) | 61.67 | < 0.001 | 0.70 | 3.36 | n.s. | 5.95 | 0.009 | 0.19 | |
| A×B | 1.19 | n.s. | 0.11 | n.s. | 2.31 | n.s. | |||
图3符合空间形象性呈现条件下, 语义相反、语义无关词对所诱发的ERPs。时间窗为：红色区域N200, 蓝色区域N400, 绿色区域N700。
图3符合空间形象性呈现条件下, 语义相反、语义无关词对所诱发的ERPs。时间窗为：红色区域N200, 蓝色区域N400, 绿色区域N700。参考文献 36
| [1] | Barsalou L. W., Santos A., Simmons W. K., & Wilson C. D . (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. de Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245-283). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. |
| [2] | Binder J. R., Westbury C. F., Mckiernan K. A., Possing E. T., & Medler D. A . (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 905-917. |
| [3] | Borghi A. M., Binkofski F., Castelfranchi C., Cimatti F., Scorolli C., & Tummolini L . (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263-292. |
| [4] | Cohen J . (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. |
| [5] | Dove G . (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412-431. |
| [6] | Dove G . (2010). On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(6), 242. |
| [7] | Estes Z., Verges M., & Barsalou L. W . (2008). Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the objects' typical location. Psychological Science, 19(2), 93-97. |
| [8] | Folstein J. R., & van Petten C . (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 152-170. |
| [9] | Gullick M. M., Mitra P., & Coch D . (2013). Imagining the truth and the moon: An electrophysiological study of abstract and concrete word processing. Psychophysiology, 50(5), 431-440. |
| [10] | Hirschfeld G., Zwitserlood P., & Dobel C . (2011). Effects of language comprehension on visual processing - MEG dissociates early perceptual and late N400 effects. Brain and Language, 116(2), 91-96. |
| [11] | Holcomb P. J., Kounios J., Anderson J. E., & West W. C . (1999). Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(3), 721-742. |
| [12] | Hubbard T. M., Magne C., & Langston W . (2014). Spatial configuration of vertically related word pairs modulates the N400 component. Neuroreport, 25(18), 1424-1428. |
| [13] | Kutas M., & Federmeier K. D . (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647. |
| [14] | Lakens D . (2012). Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: Structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 726-736. |
| [15] | Lakoff G., & Johnson M . (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| [16] | Lakoff G., & Johnson M . (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. |
| [17] | Laszlo S., & Federmeier K. D . (2011). The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 176-186. |
| [18] | Louwerse M. M . (2008). Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 838-844. |
| [19] | Louwerse M. M., & Connell L . (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381-398. |
| [20] | Louwerse M. M., & Hutchinson S . (2012). Neurological evidence linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation in conceptual processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 385. |
| [21] | Louwerse M. M., & Jeuniaux P . (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114(1), 96-104. |
| [22] | Louwerse M. M., He X. Y., Deng Y. M., Zhao X. R., & Xue Y . (2017). Symbol interdependency in language processing: Interactions between language statistics and perceptual simulation. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), (2), 51-60. |
| [ Louwerse, M. M., 何先友, 邓玉梅, 赵雪汝, 薛颖 . (2017). 语言加工中的符号相互依存: 语言统计和知觉模拟的交互作用. 华南师范大学学报: 社会科学版(2), 51-60.] | |
| [23] | Lund K., & Burgess C . (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 28(2), 203-208. |
| [24] | Malhi S. K., & Buchanan L . (2018). A test of the symbol interdependency hypothesis with both concrete and abstract stimuli. Plos One, 13(3), e0192719. |
| [25] | Markman A. B., & Dietrich E . (2000). Extending the classical view of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 470-475. |
| [26] | Meier B. P., Hauser D. J., Robinson M. D., Friesen C. K., & Schjeldahl K . (2007). What's "up" with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 93(5), 699-710. |
| [27] | Patel S. H., & Azzam P. N . (2005). Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected studies of the event-related potential. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 2(4), 147-154. |
| [28] | Schubert T. W . (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1-21. |
| [29] | Song Y. Q., & Zhang J. J . (2014). Temporal-spatial metaphor in conceptual representation: Can spatial information be activated when processing the temporal reference which implied in the changing shape of objects? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(2), 216-226. |
| [ 宋宜琪, 张积家 . (2014). 空间隐喻和形状变化对物体内隐时间概念加工的影响. 心理学报, 46(2), 216-226.] | |
| [30] | Stefanucci J. K., & Storbeck J . (2009). Don't look down: Emotional arousal elevates height perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 131-145. |
| [31] | Tse C. S., Kurby C. A., & Du F . (2010). Perceptual simulations and linguistic representations have differential effects on speeded relatedness judgements and recognition memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 928-941. |
| [32] | Wang J., Conder J. A., Blitzer D. N., & Shinkareva S. V . (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31(10), 1459-1468. |
| [33] | Wang, R. M, Mo, L., Wang R. M., Mo L., Li L., Wang S. P., & Wu J . (2005). Perceptual symbol representation and propositional symbol representation in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(2), 143-150. |
| [ 王瑞明, 莫雷, 李利, 王穗苹, 吴俊 . (2005). 言语理解中的知觉符号表征与命题符号表征. 心理学报, 37(2), 143-150.] | |
| [34] | Wang X. X., Jiang S., & Zhang J. J . (2018). Effect of the spatial linguistic symbol on the container metaphor of seniority rules. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(09), 953-964. |
| [ 汪新筱, 江珊, 张积家 . (2018). 空间语言标记影响亲属关系的容器隐喻. 心理学报, 50(09), 953-964.] | |
| [35] | West W. C., & Holcomb P. J . (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1024-1037. |
| [36] | Zwaan R. A., & Yaxley R. H . (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 954-958. |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 苏佳佳,叶浩生. 中国神话中的具身心理学思想探索[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 386-398. |
| [2] | 叶浩生,曾红,杨文登. 生成认知：理论基础与实践走向[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(11): 1270-1280. |
| [3] | 黎晓丹,丁道群,叶浩生. 身体姿势启动的内隐权力感对公平决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 106-116. |
| [4] | 宋晓蕾, 李洋洋, 杨倩, 游旭群. 反应手的不同状态对联合任务中观察学习的影响 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 975-984. |
| [5] | 易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生. 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 793-802. |
| [6] | 叶浩生, 麻彦坤, 杨文登. 身体与认知表征：见解与分歧[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 462-472. |
| [7] | 杨继平, 郭秀梅, 王兴超. 道德概念的隐喻表征 ——从红白颜色、左右位置和正斜字体的维度[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 875-885. |
| [8] | 鲁忠义;贾利宁;翟冬雪. 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射：双向性及不平衡性[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 186-196. |
| [9] | 黎晓丹; 杜建政; 叶浩生. 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应：蜷缩的身体使人更卑微[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 746-756. |
| [10] | 刘文娟;沈曼琼;李莹;王瑞明. 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 163-173. |
| [11] | 苏得权;曾红;陈骐; 叶浩生. 用药动作线索诱发海洛因戒断者的镜像神经活动：一项fMRI研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1499-1506. |
| [12] | 刘思耘;周宗奎;李娜. 网络使用经验对动作动词加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 992-1003. |
| [13] | 杨惠兰;何先友;赵雪汝;张维. 权力的概念隐喻表征：来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 939-949. |
| [14] | 黎晓丹;叶浩生. 中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 702-710. |
| [15] | 唐佩佩;叶浩生;杜建政. 权力概念与空间大小：具身隐喻的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 514-521. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4626
