删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

自我参照加工的近空间距离增强效应:来自行为与ERPs的证据

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

章鹏程1, 李杨卓2, 周淑金1, 高湘萍1(), 潘鑫3
1 上海师范大学教育学院心理系, 上海 200234
2 华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062
3 南京旅游职业学院, 南京 211100
收稿日期:2018-10-23出版日期:2019-08-25发布日期:2019-06-24
通讯作者:高湘萍E-mail:gaoxp@shnu.edu.cn

基金资助:* 上海师范大学创新一流研究生人才培养机制改革项目之博士研究生拔尖人才培育项目资助(209-AC9103-19-368005010)

Enhancement effect of near spatial distance on self-referential processing: Evidence from behavioral and ERPs studies

ZHANG Pengcheng1, LI Yangzhuo2, ZHOU Shujin1, GAO Xiangping1(), PAN Xin3
1 Department of Psychology, School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
2 The School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
3 Nanjing Institute of Tourism and Hospitality, Nanjing 211100, China
Received:2018-10-23Online:2019-08-25Published:2019-06-24
Contact:GAO Xiangping E-mail:gaoxp@shnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 研究采用学习-再认范式考察空间距离如何影响自我参照加工。首先通过事件相关电位技术探索不同空间距离怎样影响自我参照加工的过程, 再结合再认测试验证影响的稳定性。结果显示:(1)学习阶段, 近空间距离在晚期认知加工阶段对自我参照加工具有明显的增强作用, 并且在再认测试中得到了验证; (2)研究结果同样也发现了学习阶段近空间距离对他人参照加工的增强作用, 但未在再认测试中得到验证。本研究证实了近空间距离能够促进自我参照更加精细化加工, 拓展了对自我参照加工的认识和自我的了解。



图1距离设置
图1距离设置


表1分组描述性统计
组别 熟悉度 频率 效价 唤醒度
M SD M SD M SD M SD
近我 4.33 0.70 0.0022 0.0019 2.53 0.57 2.77 0.64
远我 4.38 0.60 0.0020 0.0014 2.56 0.54 2.72 0.62
近他 4.36 0.72 0.0019 0.0012 2.57 0.56 2.80 0.65
远他 4.32 0.74 0.0022 0.0018 2.55 0.60 2.79 0.65
新词 4.34 0.65 0.0025 0.0020 2.60 0.54 2.74 0.59

表1分组描述性统计
组别 熟悉度 频率 效价 唤醒度
M SD M SD M SD M SD
近我 4.33 0.70 0.0022 0.0019 2.53 0.57 2.77 0.64
远我 4.38 0.60 0.0020 0.0014 2.56 0.54 2.72 0.62
近他 4.36 0.72 0.0019 0.0012 2.57 0.56 2.80 0.65
远他 4.32 0.74 0.0022 0.0018 2.55 0.60 2.79 0.65
新词 4.34 0.65 0.0025 0.0020 2.60 0.54 2.74 0.59



图2实验流程
图2实验流程


表2学习和再认阶段描述性统计(N = 27)
变量 学习阶段RT (ms) 正确再认RT (ms) 正确再认N
M SD M SD M SD
近我 707.50 164.61 788.85 121.69 16.22 5.08
远我 725.42 167.38 785.08 140.79 14.63 4.70
近他 745.09 162.02 788.70 175.26 13.48 4.70
远他 769.65 168.27 790.05 135.95 14.67 4.96

表2学习和再认阶段描述性统计(N = 27)
变量 学习阶段RT (ms) 正确再认RT (ms) 正确再认N
M SD M SD M SD
近我 707.50 164.61 788.85 121.69 16.22 5.08
远我 725.42 167.38 785.08 140.79 14.63 4.70
近他 745.09 162.02 788.70 175.26 13.48 4.70
远他 769.65 168.27 790.05 135.95 14.67 4.96



图3四种实验条件下的ERPs总平均波形图
图3四种实验条件下的ERPs总平均波形图



图4四种实验条件下的地形图
图4四种实验条件下的地形图







[1] Abrams R. A., Davoli C. C., Du F., Iii W. H. K., & Paull D . ( 2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107(3), 1035-1047.
[2] Allan K., Morson S., Dixon S., Martin D., & Cunningham S. J . ( 2017). Simulation-based mentalizing generates a "proxy" self-reference effect in memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(6), 1074-1084.
[3] Argembeau A. D., Comblain C., & van der Linden, M. .,( 2005). Affective valence and the self-reference effect: Influence of retrieval conditions. British Journal of Psychology, 96(4), 457-466.
[4] Chen J., Yuan J., Feng T., Chen A., Gu B., & Li H . ( 2011). Temporal features of the degree effect in self-relevance: Neural correlates. Biological Psychology, 87(2), 290-295.
[5] Dainer-best J., Trujillo L. T., Schnyer D. M., & Beevers C. G . ( 2017). Sustained engagement of attention is associated with increased negative self-referent processing in major depressive disorder. Biological Psychology, 129, 231-241.
[6] Fan W., Chen J., Wang X-Y., Cai R., Tan Q., Chen Y., … Zhong Y. P . ( 2013). Electrophysiological correlation of the degree of self-reference effect. PLoS One, 8(12), e80289.
[7] Fan W., Zhong Y. P., Li J., Yang Z., Zhan Y., Cai R., & Fu X. L . ( 2016). Negative emotion weakens the degree of self-reference effect: Evidence from ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1408.
[8] Fields E.C., &Kuperberg G.R, . ( 2016). Dynamic effects of self-relevance and task on the neural processing of emotional words in context. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2003.
[9] Fujita K., Henderson M. D., Eng J., Trope Y., & Liberman N . ( 2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17(4), 278-282.
[10] Gregg A. P., Mahadevan N., & Sedikides C . ( 2017). The SPOT effect: people spontaneously prefer their own theories. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(6), 996-1010.
[11] Griffin I. C., Miniussi C., & Nobre A. C . ( 2002). Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: differential modulation of stimulus processing by attention to space or time. Neuropsychologia, 40(13), 2325-2340.
[12] Grilli M. D., Woolverton C. B., Crawford M. S., & Glisky E. L . ( 2018). Self-reference and emotional memory effects in older adults at increased genetic risk of alzheimer’s disease. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(2), 186-199.
[13] Handy T. C., Grafton S. T., Shroff N. M., Ketay S., & Gazzaniga M. S . ( 2003). Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience, 6(4), 421-427.
[14] Henderson M. D., Fujita K., Trope Y., & Liberman N . ( 2006). Transcending the"here": The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 845-856.
[15] Kalenzaga S., &Jouhaud V. , ( 2018). The self-reference effect in memory: An implicit way to assess affective self- representations in social anxiety. Memory, 26(7), 894-903.
[16] Kalenzaga S., Sperduti M., Anssens A., Martinelli P., Devauchelle A-D., Gallarda T., … Piolino P . ( 2015). Episodic memory and self-reference via semantic autobiographical memory: Insights from an fMRI study in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 449.
[17] Kasai T., Morotomi T., Katayama J. I., & Kumada T . ( 2003). Attending to a location in three-dimensional space modulates early ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(2), 273-285.
[18] Keenan J. P., Nelson A., O'Connor M., & Pascual-Leone A . ( 2001). Neurology: Self-recognition and the right hemisphere. Nature, 409(6818), 305-306.
[19] Kim H. .( 2012). A dual-subsystem model of the brain's default network: Self-referential processing, memory retrieval processes, and autobiographical memory retrieval. Neuroimage, 61(4), 966-977.
[20] Klein S.B . ( 2012). Self, memory, and the self-reference effect: An examination of conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 283-300.
[21] Klimesch W., Sauseng P., & Hanslmayr S . ( 2007). EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Research Reviews, 53(1), 63-88.
[22] Kolb L.E . ( 2015). Friend or foe? The relationship between facebook use and satisfaction and jealousy in long-distance dating relationships. Pepperdine Journal of Communication Research, 3(1), 2.
[23] Kong F., Chen H., Zhang Y., & Kou H . ( 2012). The self-reference effect in evaluating physical and inner ugliness: An event related-potential study. International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 9, 3004-3008.
[24] Leshikar E.D., &Duarte A. , ( 2014). Medial prefrontal cortex supports source memory for self-referenced materials in young and older adults. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(1), 236-252.
[25] Li H., Liang L. Y., Zhang X., & Gao X. R . ( 2016). Understanding the face perception in the early stage through P1. Beijing Biomedical Engineering, 35(6), 551-560.
[ 李航, 梁栗炎, 张旭, 高小榕 . ( 2016). 基于事件相关电位P1的人脸视觉信息早期加工研究. 北京生物医学工程, 35(6), 551-560.]
[26] Li W. H., Jiang Z. Q., Li C., Liu Y., & Liu F. B . ( 2015). Spatio-temporal features of internal self-reference processing in brain:evidence from the ERP. Psychological Exploration, 35(2), 147-152.
[ 李文辉, 蒋重清, 李婵, 刘颖, 刘富斌 . ( 2015). 人脑加工自我参照任务的时空特点: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学探新, 35(2), 147-152.]
[27] Liu P., Forte J., Sewell D., & Carter O . ( 2018). Cognitive load effects on early visual perceptual processing. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 80(4), 929-950.
[28] Ma Y., & Han S. , ( 2010). Why we respond faster to the self than to others? An implicit positive association theory of self-advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 36(3), 619-633.
[29] Markman A.B., & Brendl C.M . ( 2005). Constraining theories of embodied cognition. Psychological Science, 16(1), 6-10.
[30] Morita T., Saito D. N., Ban M., Shimada K., Okamoto Y., Kosaka H., … Naito E . ( 2018). Self-face recognition begins to share active region in right inferior parietal lobule with proprioceptive illusion during adolescence. Cerebral Cortex, 28(4), 1532-1548.
[31] Natale E., Marzi C. A., Girelli M., Pavone E. F., & Pollmann S . ( 2006). ERP and fMRI correlates of endogenous and exogenous focusing of visual-spatial attention. European Journal of Neuroscience, 23(9), 2511-2521.
[32] Oakes M.A., & Onyper S.V . ( 2017). The movement-induced self-reference effect: Enhancing memorability through movement toward the self. Cognitive Processing, 18(3), 325-333.
[33] Peng X., Jiao C., Cui F., Chen Q., Li P., & Li H . ( 2017). The time course of indirect moral judgment in gossip processing modulated by different agents. Psychophysiology, 54(10), 1459-1471.
[34] Reed C. L., Grubb J. D., & Steele C . ( 2006). Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 166-177.
[35] Rogers T. B., Kuiper N. A., & Kirker W. S . ( 1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 677-688.
[36] Sambo C.F., & Forster B. , ( 2009). An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: Evidence for the spatial rule. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(8), 1550-1559.
[37] Slagter H. A., Prinssen S., Reteig L. C., & Mazaheri A . ( 2016). Facilitation and inhibition in attention: Functional dissociation of pre-stimulus alpha activity, P1 and N1 components. Neuroimage, 125, 25-35.
[38] Spence C., & Parise C. , ( 2010). Prior-entry: A review. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 364-379.
[39] Symons C.S., & Johnson B.T . ( 1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371-394.
[40] Tacikowski P., Brechmann A., & Nowicka A . ( 2013). Cross‐modal pattern of brain activations associated with the processing of self‐and significant other's name. Human Brain Mapping, 34(9), 2069-2077.
[41] Taylor M. J., Arsalidou M., Bayless S. J., Morris D., Evans J. W., & Barbeau E. J . ( 2009). Neural correlates of personally familiar faces: Parents, partner and own faces. Human Brain Mapping, 30(7), 2008-2020.
[42] Trope Y., & Liberman N. , ( 2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
[43] Truong G., Chapman C. S., Chisholm J. D., Enns J. T., & Handy T. C . ( 2016). Mine in motion: How physical actions impact the psychological sense of object ownership. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 42(3), 375-385.
[44] Valdés-Conroy B., Román F. J., Hinojosa J. A., & Shorkey S. P . ( 2012). So far so good: emotion in the peripersonal/extrapersonal space. PLoS One, 7(11), e49162.
[45] Valdés-Conroy B., Sebastián M., Hinojosa J. A., Román F. J., & Santaniello G . ( 2014). A close look into the near/far space division: A real-distance ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 59, 27-34.
[46] Wang P., Chen Q. W., Tang X. C., Luo J. L., Tan C. H., & Gao F . ( 2017). The situational primacy of Chinese individual self, relational self, collective self: evidence from ERP. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(8), 1072-1079.
[ 王沛, 陈庆伟, 唐晓晨, 罗俊龙, 谈晨皓, 高凡 . ( 2017). 中国人三重自我建构加工中的相对优先性: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 49(8), 1072-1079.]
[47] Wang L., & Yao W. , ( 2016). So near, so good: Does near-distance perception reduce interpersonal psychological distance? Social Behavior and Personality an International Journal, 44(6), 889-898.
[48] Yuan J. J., Yang J. M., Meng X. X., Yu F. Q., & Li H . ( 2008). The valence strength of negative stimuli modulates visual novelty processing: Electrophysiological evidence from an event-related potential study. Neuroscience, 157(3), 524-531.
[49] Zhang H. C., & Xu J. P. ,( 2015). Modern psychological and educational statistics . Beijing,China: Beijing Normal University Press.
[ 张厚粲, 徐建平 . ( 2015). 现代心理与教育统计学. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.]
[50] Zheng J. J., Cai M., Li C. Z., & Shao C . ( 2017). Impacts of decision framing and psychological distance on individual cooperative behavior. Management Review, 29(5), 102-109.
[ 郑君君, 蔡明, 李诚志, 邵聪 . ( 2017). 决策框架、心理距离对个体间合作行为影响的实验研究. 管理评论, 29(5), 102-109.]




[1]于宙, 张清芳. 句法结构和动词重复对汉语句子口语产生中句法启动效应的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 283-293.
[2]王斌, 付雅, 张积家. 语言和文化对自我参照条件下提取诱发遗忘的影响——来自汉族人和摩梭人的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 450-461.
[3]杨群, 冯意然, 张积家. 父亲参照效应的语言与文化差异:来自提取诱发遗忘的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 304-315.
[4]刘璐, 闫国利. 聋人阅读中的副中央凹视觉注意增强效应——来自消失文本的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 715-726.
[5]彭明, 金文颖, 蔡梦菲, 周宗奎. 网络词语与非网络词语的知觉差异:时间知觉、 空间距离知觉与知觉范围[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 866-874.
[6]范伟;钟毅平;杨子鹿;李琎;欧阳益; 蔡荣华; 李慧云 ;傅小兰 . 外倾个体的自我参照加工程度效应[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 1002-1012.
[7]徐富明;蒋多;张慧;李欧;孔诗晓; 史燕伟. 心理距离对基线比例忽略的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1292-1301.
[8]周爱保;张奋;马小凤;李建升;夏瑞雪. 阿訇参照效应的文化差异:基于提取诱发遗忘范式的探讨[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 757-764.
[9]陈洁彬;鲁忠义. 路径转弯对语篇空间情境模型建构的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 176-189.
[10]钟毅平;范伟;蔡荣华;谭千保;肖丽辉;占友龙;罗西;秦敏辉. 正性情绪诱导下的自我参照加工:来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(3): 341-352 .
[11]康诚;王振宏. 依赖于唤醒与效价的情绪记忆增强效应:自动与控制加工[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(9): 970-980.
[12]王海宝,张达人,余永强. 情绪记忆增强效应的时间依赖性[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(10): 932-938.
[13]杨红升,朱滢. 自我与提取诱发遗忘现象[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(02): 154-159.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4485
相关话题/心理 实验 空间 统计 流程