预期交流与创造力的关系:解释水平的调节作用

删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

栾墨¹^,², 吴霜²^,³, 李虹²^,⁴(

)

¹对外经济贸易大学国际商学院, 北京 100029
²清华大学心理学系, 北京 100084
³加州大学圣迭戈分校雷迪管理学院, 拉霍亚 92093 美国
⁴清华大学深圳研究生院, 深圳 518055

收稿日期:2019-07-10出版日期:2020-10-25发布日期:2020-08-24
通讯作者:李虹E-mail:lhong@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金项目(71871124);国家社科基金重点项目(20AZD085)

The relationship between anticipated communication and creativity: Moderating role of construal level

LUAN Mo¹^,², WU Shuang²^,³, LI Hong²^,⁴(

)

¹International School of Business, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100029, China
²Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
³Rady School of Management, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA
⁴Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China

Received:2019-07-10Online:2020-10-25Published:2020-08-24
Contact:LI Hong E-mail:lhong@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 该研究探讨了预期交流对创造力的影响, 以及解释水平在其中的调节作用。实验1采用结构性想象任务探讨预期交流是否影响创造力。结果表明, 相较于没有预期交流, 预期交流条件下的个体表现出更高的创造力。实验2采取了创意产生任务, 并探讨了解释水平在其中的调节作用。结果表明, 当完成抽象的、高解释水平任务时, 相较于无预期交流, 预期交流条件下个体在新奇性和变通性两个维度上表现出了更高的创造力; 当完成具体的、低解释水平任务时, 预期交流的效应不复存在。也就是说, 只有当创造力任务要求高解释水平的抽象思维时, 预期交流才能促进创造力的发挥。总结而言, 本研究在过往对于交流与创造力以及解释水平与创造力的研究基础上进一步发现, 对于抽象创造力任务, 虽然真正的信息交流尚未发生, 但仅仅对于交流的预期就会提高创造力水平。

图/表 5

图1研究的理论框架

图1研究的理论框架

表1不同预期交流条件下的新奇性得分、新奇特征数、熟悉度、享受度和动机

预期交流	新奇性得分		新奇特征数		熟悉度		享受度		动机
预期交流	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD
有(N = 53)	4.59	2.13	2.04	1.35	1.47	0.95	5.05	1.30	5.38	1.02
无(N = 57)	3.31	1.87	1.26	1.21	1.77	1.10	5.13	1.46	5.37	1.03

表1不同预期交流条件下的新奇性得分、新奇特征数、熟悉度、享受度和动机

预期交流	新奇性得分		新奇特征数		熟悉度		享受度		动机
预期交流	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD
有(N = 53)	4.59	2.13	2.04	1.35	1.47	0.95	5.05	1.30	5.38	1.02
无(N = 57)	3.31	1.87	1.26	1.21	1.77	1.10	5.13	1.46	5.37	1.03

图2不同交流预期和任务解释水平下的新奇性得分(误差线表示95%置信区间, **p < 0.01)

图3不同交流预期和任务解释水平下的变通性得分(误差线表示95%置信区间, **p < 0.01)

图4不同交流预期和任务解释水平下的流畅性得分(误差线表示95%置信区间)

参考文献 44

[1]	Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5(1), 63-82.
[2]	Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221-233.
[3]	Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013.
[4]	Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
[5]	Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393-399.
[6]	Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3-15.
[7]	Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3), 321-341.
[8]	Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478-485.
[9]	Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(1), 135-146.
[10]	Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 682-696. URLpmid: 12703643
[11]	Ebadi, Y. M., & Utterback, J. M. (1984). The effects of communication on technological innovation. Management Science, 30(5), 572-585.
[12]	F?rster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 177-189. URLpmid: 15301626
[13]	Grant, A. M., & Berry, J. (2011). The necessity of others is the mother of invention: Intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54( 1), 73-96.
[14]	Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
[15]	Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 214-230. URLpmid: 18211173
[16]	Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122-1131. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.6.1122 URLpmid: 3598858
[17]	Jia, L., Hirt, E. R., & Karpen, S. C. (2009). Lessons from a faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1127-1131.
[18]	Joshi, P. D., & Wakslak, C. J. (2014). Communicating with the crowd: Speakers use abstract messages when addressing larger audiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 351-362. doi: 10.1037/a0032413 URL
[19]	Joshi, P. D., Wakslak, C. J., Raj, M., & Trope, Y. (2016). Communicating with distant others: The functional use of abstraction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 37-44.
[20]	Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523.
[21]	Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York, NY: Macmillan.
[22]	Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137.
[23]	Lu, J. G., Akinola, M., & Mason, M. F. (2017). “Switching On” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 63-75.
[24]	Lu, J. G., Hafenbrack, A. C., Eastwick, P. W., Wang, D. J., Maddux, W. W., & Galinsky, A. D. (2017). “Going out” of the box: Close intercultural friendships and romantic relationships spark creativity, workplace innovation, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1091-1108. doi: 10.1037/apl0000212 URLpmid: 28358527
[25]	Monge, P. R., Cozzens, M. D., & Contractor, N. S. (1992). Communication and motivational predictors of the dynamics of organizational innovation. Organization Science, 3(2), 250-274.
[26]	Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-43.
[27]	Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press Innovation through collaboration. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
[28]	Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C.Kaufman & R. J.Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48-73). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
[29]	Polman, E., & Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 492-501. doi: 10.1177/0146167211398362 URLpmid: 21317316
[30]	Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001 URL
[31]	Semin, G. R., de Montes, G. L., & Valencia, J. F. (2003). Communication constraints on the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 142-148. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00523-1 URL
[32]	Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004 URL
[33]	Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(1), 1-22. URLpmid: 11162295
[34]	Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., ... Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68-85. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68 URL
[35]	Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151-158. URLpmid: 11392859
[36]	Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845-851. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845 URLpmid: 16393019
[37]	Steinmetz, J., & Pfattheicher, S. (2017). Beyond social facilitation: A review of the far-reaching effects of social attention. Social Cognition, 35(5), 585-599.
[38]	Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. doi: 10.1037/a0018963 URLpmid: 20438233
[39]	Uziel, L. (2007). Individual differences in the social facilitation effect: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 579-601.
[40]	Uziel, L. (2010). Look at me, I’m happy and creative: The effect of impression management on behavior in social presence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1591-1602. doi: 10.1177/0146167210386239 URLpmid: 20956356
[41]	Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660-671.
[42]	van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
[43]	Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1-40.
[44]	Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.