删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

中文阅读中长距离回视引导机制的眼动研究

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

杨帆, 隋雪(), 李雨桐()
辽宁师范大学心理学院, 大连 116029
收稿日期:2019-06-28出版日期:2020-08-25发布日期:2020-06-28
通讯作者:隋雪,李雨桐E-mail:suixue88@163.com;dearliyutong@163.com

基金资助:* 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(19YJA190005);辽宁省教育厅高水平创新团队国外培养项目(2018LNGXGJWP-YB015);辽宁省教育科学“十三五”规划年度课题(JG16CB341);辽宁省教育厅科学研究经费项目(LJ2019015);全国教育科学"十三五"规划2019年度教育部重点项目(DHA190373)

An eye movement study for the guidance mechanism of long-distance regressions in Chinese reading

YANG Fan, SUI Xue(), YI Yutong()
School of psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
Received:2019-06-28Online:2020-08-25Published:2020-06-28
Contact:SUI Xue,YI Yutong E-mail:suixue88@163.com;dearliyutong@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 从记忆的角度, 探讨中文阅读中长距离回视的引导机制。采用眼动实验, 操纵了回视条件(实验1)、回视可见性(实验2)、目标词位置及词频变量。结果发现:与不阅读组相比, 阅读组的最初回视误差更小, 定位效率更高; 与可见组相比, 不可见组累积回视距离更大, 且难以正确定位目标; 目标词位置主效应显著, 而词频主效应不显著。结果表明, 回视具有空间选择性, 最初的回视由空间记忆引导, 最初回视后的修正眼跳在文本可见情况下才能正常进行, 而词频这一言语属性对回视没有显著影响, 本研究结果支持了空间编码假设。


表1实验材料举例
词汇类型 词汇位置 句子举例 目标词
高频 前1/3 该作品的宗旨就是为了弘扬中国传统文化。 作品
中间1/3 看到如此混乱的局面委员会觉得十分困惑。 委员
后1/3 这些村民对这个不速之客的生活充满兴趣。 生活
低频 前1/3 该书院的宗旨就是为了弘扬中国传统文化。 书院
中间1/3 看到如此混乱的局面贵宾会觉得十分困惑。 贵宾
后1/3 这些村民对这个不速之客的面容充满兴趣。 面容

表1实验材料举例
词汇类型 词汇位置 句子举例 目标词
高频 前1/3 该作品的宗旨就是为了弘扬中国传统文化。 作品
中间1/3 看到如此混乱的局面委员会觉得十分困惑。 委员
后1/3 这些村民对这个不速之客的生活充满兴趣。 生活
低频 前1/3 该书院的宗旨就是为了弘扬中国传统文化。 书院
中间1/3 看到如此混乱的局面贵宾会觉得十分困惑。 贵宾
后1/3 这些村民对这个不速之客的面容充满兴趣。 面容


表2所有实验条件在4个回视指标上的描述统计结果[M (SD)]
回视条件 词频 目标词位置 最初回视误差 最初回视大小 累积回视距离 回视反应时
阅读组 高频词 前1/3 248.97 (68.38) 436.42 (71.52) 26.74 (3.45) 2012 (736)
中间1/3 159.26 (36.31) 410.63 (63.76) 23.87 (3.05) 1804 (577)
后1/3 116.20 (41.41) 373.39 (67.86) 22.23 (5.38) 1613 (471)
低频词 前1/3 252.84 (71.40) 432.07 (73.97) 26.35 (3.96) 1906 (812)
中间1/3 143.39 (32.19) 410.57 (47.71) 23.00 (3.91) 1863 (642)
后1/3 112.11 (36.49) 353.59 (73.56) 20.68 (5.69) 1688 (591)
不阅读组 高频词 前1/3 317.02 (122.25) 375.64 (137.14) 30.57 (5.63) 2234 (743)
中间1/3 202.17 (66.28) 387.95 (138.31) 30.52 (9.20) 1894 (570)
后1/3 158.15 (100.56) 396.33 (151.15) 29.96 (9.66) 1756 (680)
低频词 前1/3 310.23 (114.87) 376.61 (122.86) 30.97 (6.54) 2240 (922)
中间1/3 211.48 (61.01) 368.88 (143.83) 28.52 (6.78) 1858 (506)
后1/3 159.76 (81.62) 402.25 (125.88) 30.91 (9.86) 1925 (607)

表2所有实验条件在4个回视指标上的描述统计结果[M (SD)]
回视条件 词频 目标词位置 最初回视误差 最初回视大小 累积回视距离 回视反应时
阅读组 高频词 前1/3 248.97 (68.38) 436.42 (71.52) 26.74 (3.45) 2012 (736)
中间1/3 159.26 (36.31) 410.63 (63.76) 23.87 (3.05) 1804 (577)
后1/3 116.20 (41.41) 373.39 (67.86) 22.23 (5.38) 1613 (471)
低频词 前1/3 252.84 (71.40) 432.07 (73.97) 26.35 (3.96) 1906 (812)
中间1/3 143.39 (32.19) 410.57 (47.71) 23.00 (3.91) 1863 (642)
后1/3 112.11 (36.49) 353.59 (73.56) 20.68 (5.69) 1688 (591)
不阅读组 高频词 前1/3 317.02 (122.25) 375.64 (137.14) 30.57 (5.63) 2234 (743)
中间1/3 202.17 (66.28) 387.95 (138.31) 30.52 (9.20) 1894 (570)
后1/3 158.15 (100.56) 396.33 (151.15) 29.96 (9.66) 1756 (680)
低频词 前1/3 310.23 (114.87) 376.61 (122.86) 30.97 (6.54) 2240 (922)
中间1/3 211.48 (61.01) 368.88 (143.83) 28.52 (6.78) 1858 (506)
后1/3 159.76 (81.62) 402.25 (125.88) 30.91 (9.86) 1925 (607)


表3所有实验条件在4个回视指标上的描述统计结果[M (SD)]
回视可见性 词频 目标词位置 最初回视误差 最初回视大小 累积回视距离 回视反应时
可见组 高频词 前1/3 275.31 (68.10) 391.23 (70.06) 23.76 (1.83) 1827 (509)
中间1/3 152.24 (35.71) 392.74 (67.56) 22.12 (3.61) 1663 (495)
后1/3 93.53 (33.36) 338.96 (58.62) 18.24 (3.49) 1498 (437)
低频词 前1/3 266.58 (94.40) 401.30 (98.54) 23.82 (2.56) 1802(523)
中间1/3 162.93 (33.67) 364.83 (44.58) 19.92 (2.36) 1666 (563)
后1/3 95.89 (32.92) 325.91 (64.63) 18.21 (4.53) 1579 (472)
不可见组 高频词 前1/3 171.12 (85.65) 502.00 (92.73) 23.01 (2.97) 1948 (504)
中间1/3 133.78 (40.28) 449.99 (65.31) 22.61 (4.20) 2207 (583)
后1/3 124.27 (56.12) 354.42 (91.77) 19.50 (5.53) 2005 (423)
低频词 前1/3 150.41 (68.04) 524.20 (75.08) 23.57 (2.85) 1938 (488)
中间1/3 136.38 (50.09) 438.34 (80.93) 22.48 (3.73) 2058 (584)
后1/3 126.82 (48.44) 353.43 (67.54) 20.48 (5.39) 2049 (552)

表3所有实验条件在4个回视指标上的描述统计结果[M (SD)]
回视可见性 词频 目标词位置 最初回视误差 最初回视大小 累积回视距离 回视反应时
可见组 高频词 前1/3 275.31 (68.10) 391.23 (70.06) 23.76 (1.83) 1827 (509)
中间1/3 152.24 (35.71) 392.74 (67.56) 22.12 (3.61) 1663 (495)
后1/3 93.53 (33.36) 338.96 (58.62) 18.24 (3.49) 1498 (437)
低频词 前1/3 266.58 (94.40) 401.30 (98.54) 23.82 (2.56) 1802(523)
中间1/3 162.93 (33.67) 364.83 (44.58) 19.92 (2.36) 1666 (563)
后1/3 95.89 (32.92) 325.91 (64.63) 18.21 (4.53) 1579 (472)
不可见组 高频词 前1/3 171.12 (85.65) 502.00 (92.73) 23.01 (2.97) 1948 (504)
中间1/3 133.78 (40.28) 449.99 (65.31) 22.61 (4.20) 2207 (583)
后1/3 124.27 (56.12) 354.42 (91.77) 19.50 (5.53) 2005 (423)
低频词 前1/3 150.41 (68.04) 524.20 (75.08) 23.57 (2.85) 1938 (488)
中间1/3 136.38 (50.09) 438.34 (80.93) 22.48 (3.73) 2058 (584)
后1/3 126.82 (48.44) 353.43 (67.54) 20.48 (5.39) 2049 (552)







[1] Baccino, T., & Pynte, J. (1994). Spatial coding and discourse models during text reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(2), 143-155.
[2] Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J.(1974). Working memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation ,(Vol. VIII, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.
[3] Bai, X. J., Li, X., & Yan, G. L. (2015). Eye movement control in Chinese reading: A summary over the past 20 years of research. Psychological Development and Education, 31(1), 85-91.
[ 白学军, 李馨, 闫国利. (2015). 汉语阅读眼动控制:20年研究的总结. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 85-91.]
[4] Booth, R. W., & Weger, U. W. (2013). The function of regressions in reading: Backward eye movements allow rereading. Memory and Cognition, 41(1), 82-97.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0244-yURLpmid: 22886737
[5] Carter, B. T., & Luke, S. G. (2017). Individuals' eye movements in reading are highly consistent across time and trial. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 44(3), 482-492.
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000471URLpmid: 28816481
[6] Chen, S., Chen, L. J., Yang, X. H., & Yang, Y. F. (2015). The role of discourse context on semantic integration. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(2), 167-175.
[ 陈双, 陈黎静, 杨晓虹, 杨玉芳. (2015). 语篇背景在语义整合中的作用. 心理学报, 47(2), 167-175.]
[7] Chi, H., Yan, G. L., Xu, X. L., Xia, Y., Cui, L., & Bai, X. J. (2014). The effect of phonetic radicals on identification of Chinese phonograms: Evidence from eye movement. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(9), 1242-1260.
[ 迟慧, 闫国利, 许晓露, 夏萤, 崔磊, 白学军. (2014). 声旁语音信息对形声字加工的影响——来自眼动研究的证据. 心理学报, 46(9), 1242-1260.]
[8] Christie, J. M., & Just, M. A. (1976). Remembering the location and content of sentences in a prose passage. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(6), 702-710.
doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.68.6.702URL
[9] Danna, J., Massendari, D., Furnari, B., & Ducrot, S. (2018). The optimal viewing position effect in printed versus cursive words: Evidence of a reading cost for the cursive font. Acta Psychologica, 188, 110-121.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.06.003URLpmid: 29908365
[10] Eskenazi, M. A., & Folk, J. R. (2016). Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(4), 1211-1216.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1200-9URLpmid: 27873185
[11] Ferreira, F., Apel, J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). Taking a new look at looking at nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 405-410.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.007URLpmid: 18805041
[12] Fischer, M. H. (1999). Memory for word locations in reading. Memory, 7(1), 79-116.
doi: 10.1080/741943718URLpmid: 10645374
[13] Guan, Y. Y., Song, X. N., Zheng, Y. W., Zhang, Y. L., & Cui, L. (2019). Preview processing of between words and within words in Chinese reading: No word highlighting effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(9), 969-981.
[ 关宜韫, 宋悉妮, 郑玉玮, 张颖靓, 崔磊. (2019). 中文词间词和词内词预视加工的差异:词间阴影的作用. 心理学报, 51(9), 969-981.]
[14] Guérard, K., Saint-Aubin, J., & Maltais, M. (2013). The role of verbal memory in regressions during reading. Memory and Cognition, 41(1), 122-136.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0243-zURLpmid: 22893066
[15] Guérard, K., Saint-Aubin, J., Maltais, M., & Lavoie, H. (2014). The role of verbal memory in regressions during reading is modulated by the target word's recency in memory. Memory and Cognition, 42(7), 1155-1170.
doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0424-zURLpmid: 24879638
[16] Hale, S., Myerson, J., Rhee, S. H., Weiss, C. S., & Abrams, R. A. (1996). Selective interference with the maintenance of location information in working memory. Neuropsychology, 10(2), 228-240.
[17] He, L. Y., Huang, Y. Y., Wang, M. X., Meng, Z., & Yan, G. L. (2015). The effects of background noise on Chinese passage reading: An eye movement study. Psychological Science, 38(6), 1290-1295.
[ 何立媛, 黄有玉, 王梦轩, 孟珠, 闫国利. (2015). 不同背景音对中文篇章阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 38(6), 1290-1295.]
[18] Inhoff, A. W., & Weger, U. W. (2005). Memory for word location during reading: Eye movements to previously read words are spatially selective but not precise. Memory and Cognition, 33(3), 447-461.
doi: 10.3758/bf03193062URLpmid: 16156180
[19] Kennedy, A., Brooks, R., Flynn, L.-A., & Prophet, C. (2003). The reader's spatial code. In R. Radach, J. Hy?na, & H. Deubel (Eds.). In R. Radach, J. Hy?na, & H. Deubel (Eds.).The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research(pp. 193-212). Amsterdam: Elsevier
[20] Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1987). Spatial coordinates and reading: Comments on Monk (1985). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 39(4), 649-656.
[21] Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 262-284.
[22] Liu, L., & Yan, G. L. (2018). Effect of parafoveal visual attention enhancement in deaf reading: Evidence from disappearing text. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(7), 715-726.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00715URL
[ 刘璐, 闫国利. (2018). 聋人阅读中的副中央凹视觉注意增强效应:来自消失文本的证据. 心理学报, 50(7), 715-726.]
[23] Liu, Z. F., Zhang, Z. J., Pan, Y., Tong, W., & Su, H. (2017). The characteristics of visual word encoding in preview and fixation frames during Chinese reading: Evidences from disappearing text. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(7), 853-865.
[ 刘志方, 张智君, 潘运, 仝文, 苏衡. (2017). 中文阅读中预视阶段和注视阶段内词汇视觉编码的过程特点:来自消失文本的证据. 心理学报, 49(7), 853-865.]
[24] Ma, G. J., & Zhuang, X. L. (2018). Distributional analyses of word frequency effects in Chinese sentence reading and lexical decision tasks.[J] ournal of Research in Reading, 41(S1), S1823-S196.
[25] Morris, N. (1987). Exploring the visuo-spatial scratch pad. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A Human Experimental Psychology, 39(3), 409-430.
doi: 10.1080/14640748708401796URLpmid: 3671761
[26] O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46(3), 461-488.
doi: 10.1037/h0084327URLpmid: 1486554
[27] Peng, X. L., & Huang, D. (2018). Task difficulty modulates the superiority of visual search in children with autism spectrum disorders. Psychological Science, 41(2), 498-503.
[ 彭晓玲, 黄丹. (2018). 任务难度对自闭症儿童视觉搜索优势显现的影响. 心理科学, 41(2), 498-503.]
[28] Radach, R., & Kennedy, A. (2013). Eye movements in reading: Some theoretical context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(3), 429-452.
[29] Rawson, K. A., & Miyake, A. (2002). Does relocating information in text depend on verbal or visuospatial abilities? An individual- differences analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 801-806.
doi: 10.3758/bf03196338URLpmid: 12613686
[30] Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.
[31] Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading: Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41 (7), 943-954.
doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00310-2URLpmid: 11248279
[32] Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 191-201.
doi: 10.3758/bf03197692URLpmid: 3736392
[33] Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
[34] Schotter, E. R., Tran, R., & Rayner, K. (2014). Don't believe what you read (only once): Comprehension is supported by regressions during reading. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1218-1226.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614531148URLpmid: 24747167
[35] Su, H., Liu, Z. F., & Cao, L. R. (2016). The effects of word frequency and word predictability in preview and their implications for word segmentation in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(6), 625-636.
[ 苏衡, 刘志方, 曹立人. (2016). 中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示:基于眼动的证据. 心理学报, 48(6), 625-636.]
[36] Tanaka, T., Sugimoto, M., Tanida, Y., & Saito, S. (2014). The influences of working memory representations on long-range regression in text reading: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 48, 625.
[37] Therriault, D. J., & Raney, G. E. (2002). The representation and comprehension of place-on-the-page and text-sequence memory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(2), 117-134.
[38] Vitu, F.(2005). Visual extraction processes and regressive saccades in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Cognitive processes in eye guidance (pp. 1-32). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[39] Weger, U. W., & Inhoff, A. W. (2007). Long-range regressions to previously read words are guided by spatial and verbal memory. Memory and Cognition, 35(6), 1293-1306.
doi: 10.3758/bf03193602URLpmid: 18035628
[40] Yan, G. L., Liu, N. N., Liang, F. F., Liu, Z. F., & Bai, X. J. (2015). The comparison of eye movements between Chinese children and adults when reading disappearing text. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(3), 300-318.
[ 闫国利, 刘妮娜, 梁菲菲, 刘志方, 白学军. (2015). 中文读者词汇视觉信息获取速度的发展:来自消失文本的证据. 心理学报, 47(3), 300-318.]
[41] Yan, G. L., Xiong, J. P., Zang, C. L., Yu, L. L., Cui, L., & Bai, X. J. (2013). Review of eye-movement measures in reading research. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(4), 589-605.
[ 闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605.]
[42] Zang, C. L., Meng, H. X., Bai, X. J., & Yan, G. L. (2013). Advances in landing position effect during reading. Journal of Psychological Science, 36(4), 770-775.
[ 臧传丽, 孟红霞, 白学军, 闫国利. (2013). 阅读过程中的注视位置效应. 心理科学, 36(4), 770-775.]
[43] Zhao, B. J., Wang, Y. S., Chen, M. J., Li, X., Yan, G. L., & Bai, X. J. (2018). The processing of morpheme and lexical of two-character affects the selection of saccade target during Chinese reading. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 16(6), 721-734.]
[ 赵冰洁, 王永胜, 陈茗静, 李馨, 闫国利, 白学军. (2018). 双字词整词加工与词素加工在眼跳目标选择中的作用. 心理与行为研究, 16( 6), 721-734.]




[1]陈石, 梁正, 李香兰, 陈嫣然, 赵庆柏, 于全磊, 李松清, 周治金, 刘丽中. 新颖语义联结在顿悟促进记忆效果中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 837-846.
[2]车晓玮, 徐慧云, 王凯旋, 张倩, 李寿欣. 工作记忆表征精度加工需求对注意引导的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 694-713.
[3]吴三美, 田良苏, 陈家侨, 陈广耀, 王敬欣. 中文阅读中无关言语效应的认知机制探究:眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 729-745.
[4]李俊娇, 陈伟, 胡琰健, 曹杨婧文, 郑希付. 预期错误与急性应激对不同强度恐惧记忆提取消退的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(6): 587-602.
[5]孟迎芳, 董月晴, 陈荃. 概念内隐记忆中的注意促进效应[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 469-480.
[6]张环, 王欣, 刘一贝, 曹贤才, 吴捷. 成员关系对协作提取成绩的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 481-493.
[7]周文洁, 邓丽群, 丁锦红. 物体颜色对情景记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(3): 229-243.
[8]黄月胜, 张豹, 范兴华, 黄杰. 无关工作记忆表征的负性情绪信息能否捕获视觉注意?一项眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 26-37.
[9]刘志方, 仝文, 张智君, 赵亚军. 语境预测性对阅读中字词加工过程的影响:眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1031-1047.
[10]张慢慢, 臧传丽, 徐宇峰, 白学军, 闫国利. 快速与慢速读者的中央凹加工对副中央凹预视的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 933-945.
[11]黄晏清, 孟迎芳. 目标探测对记忆提取的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 706-715.
[12]张引, 梁腾飞, 叶超雄, 刘强. 长时联结表征对工作记忆的抑制效应[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(5): 562-571.
[13]黄发杰, 孟迎芳, 严颖. 提取干扰对不同类型内隐记忆的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(5): 572-583.
[14]叶超雄, 胡中华, 梁腾飞, 张加峰, 许茜如, 刘强. 视觉工作记忆回溯线索效应的产生机制:认知阶段分离[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 399-413.
[15]赵鑫, 李红利, 金戈, 李世峰, 周爱保, 梁文佳, 郭红霞, 蔡亚亚. 语音记忆和中央执行功能在不同年级儿童解码和语言理解中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 469-484.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4774
相关话题/心理 阅读 实验 指标 中文