删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

自我相关性影响情绪词汇加工的时间进程

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

张琪1, 邓娜丽1, 姜秀敏2, 李卫君1()
1辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心
2辽宁师范大学体育学院, 大连 116029
收稿日期:2019-07-31出版日期:2020-08-25发布日期:2020-06-28
通讯作者:李卫君E-mail:li_wj@126.com

基金资助:* 辽宁省自然科学基金项目(20180550313);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(17YJC190013);辽宁省教育厅自然科学基金项目(LJ2019016)

The time course of self-relevance affecting emotional word processing

ZHANG Qi1, DENG Nali1, JIANG Xiumin2, LI Weijun1()
1Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
2School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
Received:2019-07-31Online:2020-08-25Published:2020-06-28
Contact:LI Weijun E-mail:li_wj@126.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 在社会交往中, 判断情绪刺激与自我和他人的相关程度对于情绪加工十分重要。本研究利用ERPs技术, 要求被试默读相继呈现的名字(自我、朋友和陌生人)和情绪性词汇(积极、中性和消极), 考察自我相关信息影响情绪词汇加工的动态时间特征及二者的整合机制。结果发现, 在情绪词汇加工早期, 消极词汇相比积极和中性词汇诱发了波幅更大的EPN。在加工晚期, 消极词汇相比中性词汇诱发波幅更小的N400, 并相对中性和积极词汇诱发更大的LPP。更为重要的是, 在LPP时间窗出现情绪效价和自我相关性的交互作用:与自我名字相关的消极词汇比中性词汇诱发了波幅更大的LPP, 与朋友名字相关的消极词汇比中性和积极词汇诱发了波幅更大的LPP, 而与陌生名字相关的各类词汇诱发的LPP波幅无显著差异。该研究表明, 个体对情绪信息非常敏感, 随着加工的深入会体现出不同的认知过程, 并且会根据自我相关性进行过滤, 在加工晚期与自我相关信息进行整合, 表现出自我和朋友相关的消极情绪的加工优势。


表1刺激的效价、唤醒度、具体性以及词频评分的平均数和标准差(M ± SD)
变量 消极 中性 积极
效价 3.31 ± 0.77 5.11 ± 0.37 6.33 ± 0.84
唤醒度 5.12 ± 1.31 3.44 ± 1.20 4.71 ± 1.20
具体性 4.77 ± 1.32 4.73 ± 1.37 4.95 ± 1.34
词频 34.43 ± 100.63 53.53 ± 110.01 42.29 ± 69

表1刺激的效价、唤醒度、具体性以及词频评分的平均数和标准差(M ± SD)
变量 消极 中性 积极
效价 3.31 ± 0.77 5.11 ± 0.37 6.33 ± 0.84
唤醒度 5.12 ± 1.31 3.44 ± 1.20 4.71 ± 1.20
具体性 4.77 ± 1.32 4.73 ± 1.37 4.95 ± 1.34
词频 34.43 ± 100.63 53.53 ± 110.01 42.29 ± 69



图1刺激呈现流程图
图1刺激呈现流程图



图221名被试EPN成分上诱发效应的总平均波形
图221名被试EPN成分上诱发效应的总平均波形



图321名被试N400和LPP成分上诱发的脑电效应总平均波形
图321名被试N400和LPP成分上诱发的脑电效应总平均波形



图4LPP成分上情绪词汇与名字的交互作用(A)及450~650 ms时间窗内与三种名字匹配的消极-积极/消极-中性词汇的差异波地形(B)
图4LPP成分上情绪词汇与名字的交互作用(A)及450~650 ms时间窗内与三种名字匹配的消极-积极/消极-中性词汇的差异波地形(B)







[1] Aron, A., Lewandowski, G. W., Mashek, D., & Aron, E. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In J. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90-115). New York: Oxford University Press.
[2] Bayer, M., Ruthmann, K., & Schacht, A. (2017). The impact of personal relevance on emotion processing: evidence from event-related potentials and pupillary responses. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12 (9), 1470-1479.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx075URLpmid: 28541505
[3] Bernat, E., Bunce, S., & Shevrin, H. (2001). Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 42 (1), 11-34.
doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(01)00133-7URLpmid: 11451477
[4] Brück, C., Kreifelts, B., & Wildgruber, D. (2012). From evolutionary roots to a broad spectrum of complex human emotions: Future research perspectives in the field of emotional vocal communication. Reply to comments on "Emotional voices in context: A neurobiological model of multimodal affective information processing". Physics of Life Reviews, 9(1), 9-12.
URLpmid: 22177278
[5] Cao, Y., & Wang, L. (2018). Processing of emotional information in written language(in Chinese). Chinese Science Bulletin, 63(2), 148-163.
[ 曹阳, 王琳. (2018). 书面语言中情绪信息的加工. 科学通报, 63 (2), 148-163.]
[6] Chen, Y., Zhong, Y. P., Zhou, H. B., Zhang, S. M., Tan, Q. B., & Fan, W (2014). Evidence for implicit self-positivity bias: An event-related brain potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 232 (3), 985-994.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3810-zURLpmid: 24395142
[7] Cheng, Y. W., Chen, C. Y., Lin, C.-P., Chou, K.-H., & Decety, J. (2010). Love hurts: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 51 (2), 923-929.
URLpmid: 20188182
[8] Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8 (2), 331-335.
doi: 10.3758/bf03196169URLpmid: 11495122
[9] Cunningham, W. A., Espinet, S. D., Deyoung, C. G., & Zelazo, P. D. (2005). Attitudes to the right- and left: Frontal ERP asymmetries associated with stimulus valence and processing goals. NeuroImage, 28 (4), 827-834.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.044URLpmid: 16039143
[10] Czigler, I., Cox, T. J., Gyimesi, K., & Horváth, J. (2007). Event-related potential study to aversive auditory stimuli. Neuroscience Letters, 420 (3), 251-256.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.05.007URLpmid: 17556101
[11] Decety, J., & Sommerville, J. A. (2003). Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (12), 527-533.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004URLpmid: 14643368
[12] Fan, W., Chen, J., Wang, X.-Y., Cai, R. H., Tan, Q. B., Chen, Y., & Zhong, Y. P. (2013). Electrophysiological correlation of the degree of self-reference effect. PLoS ONE, 8 (12):e80289.
URLpmid: 24312467
[13] Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). It's all about you: An ERP study of emotion and self-relevance in discourse. Neuroimage, 62 (1), 562-574.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.003URLpmid: 22584232
[14] Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2015). Loving yourself more than your neighbor: ERPs reveal online effects of a self-positivity bias. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(9), 1202-1209.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsv004URLpmid: 25605967
[15] Fields, E. C., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2016). Dynamic effects of self-relevance and task on the neural processing of emotional words in context. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-12.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00001URLpmid: 25688217
[16] Fischler, I., & Bradley, M. (2006). Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: words, phrases, and task effects. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 185-203.
URLpmid: 17015080
[17] Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: A combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132 (4), 512-529.
[18] Hajcak, G., Macnamara, A., & Olvet, D. M. (2010). Event- related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: An integrative review. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35 (2), 129-155.
doi: 10.1080/87565640903526504URLpmid: 20390599
[19] Harris, C. R., & Pashler, H. (2004). Attention and the processing of emotional words and names: Not so special after all. Psychological Science, 15 (3), 171-178.
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503005.xURLpmid: 15016288
[20] Herbert, C., Herbert, B. M., Ethofer, T., & Pauli, P. (2011a). His or mine? The time course of self-other discrimination in emotion processing. Social Neuroscience, 6(3), 277-288.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2010.523543URLpmid: 21104542
[21] Herbert, C., Herbert, B. M., & Pauli, P. (2011c). Emotional self-reference: brain structures involved in the processing of words describing one's own emotions. Neuropsychologia, 49 (10), 2947-2956.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.026URLpmid: 21756925
[22] Herbert, C., Jungh?fer, M., & Kissler, J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45(3), 487-498.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.xURLpmid: 18221445
[23] Herbert, C., Kissler, J., Jungh?fer, M., Peyk, P., & Rockstroh, B. (2006). Processing of emotional adjectives: Evidence from startle EMG and ERPs. Psychophysiology, 43 (2), 197-206.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00385.xURLpmid: 16712590
[24] Herbert, C., Pauli, P., & Herbert, B. M. (2011b). Self-reference modulates the processing of emotional stimuli in the absence of explicit self-referential appraisal instructions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(5), 653-661.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq082URLpmid: 20855295
[25] Holeckova, I., Fischer, C., Giard, M.-H., Delpuech, C., & Morlet, D. (2006). Brain responses to a subject's own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Research, 1082 (1), 142-152.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.089URLpmid: 16703673
[26] Ito, T. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit and explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (6), 660-676.
[27] Kang, T. S. (1972). Name and group identification. Journal of Social Psychology, 86 (1), 159-160.
doi: 10.1080/00224545.1972.9918610URLpmid: 5008858
[28] Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research, 1148 (1), 138-148.
[29] Kanske, P., Plitschka, J., & Kotz, S. A. (2011). Attentional orienting towards emotion: P2 and N400 ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 49 (11), 3121-3129.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.022URLpmid: 21816167
[30] Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Peyk, P., & Junghofer, M. (2007). Buzzwords: Early cortical responses to emotional words during reading. Psychological Science, 18 (6), 475-480.
URLpmid: 17576257
[31] Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Winkler, I., Junghofer, M. (2009). Emotion and attention in visual word processing: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 80 (1), 75-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.004URLpmid: 18439739
[32] Koole, S. L., & Pelham, B. W. (2003). On the nature of implicit self-esteem: The case of the name letter effect. In S. J. Spencer et al. (Eds.), In S. J. Spencer et al. (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario Symposium(Vol. 9, pp. 93-116).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates(Vol. 9, pp. 93-116).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[33] Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 (12), 463-470.
[34] Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84 (3), 437-450.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.007URLpmid: 19879918
[35] Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9 (12), 920-933.
URLpmid: 19020511
[36] Li, W., & Han, S. H. (2010). Perspective taking modulates event-related potentials to perceived pain. Neuroscience Letters, 469 (3), 328-332.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.12.021URLpmid: 20026179
[37] ?hman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130 (3), 466-478.
[38] Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1 (1), 33-60.
[39] Pinheiro, A. P., Rezaii, N., Rauber, A., & Niznikiewicz, M. (2016). Is this my voice or yours? The role of emotion and acoustic quality in self-other voice discrimination in schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 21 (4), 335-353.
doi: 10.1080/13546805.2016.1208611URLpmid: 27454152
[40] Sass, S. M., Heller, W., Stewart, J. L., Silton, R. L., Edgar, J. C., Fisher, J. E., & Miller, G. A. (2010). Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: Emotion and gender specificity. Psychophysiology, 47 (2), 247-259.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00926.xURLpmid: 19863758
[41] Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 9 (1), 28-43.
doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.1.28URLpmid: 19246325
[42] Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (2001). Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research New York: Oxford University Press.
[43] Schupp, H. T., ?hman, A., Jungh?fer, M., Weike, A. I., Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces: An erp analysis. Emotion, 4 (2), 189-200.
doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.189URLpmid: 15222855
[44] Schupp, H. T., Stockburger, J., Codispoti, M., Jungh?fer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2007). Selective visual attention to emotion. Journal of Neuroscience, 27 (5), 1082-1089.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3223-06.2007URLpmid: 17267562
[45] Scott, G. G., O'Donnell, P. J., Leuthold, H., & Sereno, S. C. (2009). Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 80 (1), 95-104.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.010URLpmid: 18440691
[46] Shestyuk, A. Y., & Deldin, P. J. (2010). Automatic and strategic representation of the self in major depression: Trait and state abnormalities. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167 (5), 536-544.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.06091444URLpmid: 20360316
[47] Suls, J., Lemos, K., & Stewart, H. L. (2002). Self-esteem, construal, and comparisons with the self, friends, and peers. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82 (2), 252-261.
URLpmid: 11831414
[48] Tacikowski, P., Brechmann, A., Marchewka, A., Jednoróg, K., Dobrowolny, M., & Nowicka, A. (2011). Is it about the self or the significance? An fmri study of self-name recognition. Social Neuroscience, 6 (1), 98-107.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2010.490665URLpmid: 20602286
[49] Tacikowski, P., Brechmann, A., & Nowicka, A. (2012). Cross-modal pattern of brain activations associated with the processing of self- and significant other's name. Hum Brain Mapping, 34 (9), 2069-2077.
[50] Tacikowski, P., Cygan, H. B., & Nowicka, A. (2014). Neural correlates of own and close-other's name recognition: ERP evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 8, 194.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00194URLpmid: 24772076
[51] Tateuchi, T., Itoh, K., & Nakada, T. (2012). Neural mechanisms underlying the orienting response to subject's own name: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 49 (6), 786-791.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01363.xURLpmid: 22416997
[52] Thierry, G., & Roberts, M. V. (2007). Event-related potential study of attention capture by affective sounds. NeuroReport, 18 (3), 245-248.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328011dc95URLpmid: 17314665
[53] Vuilleumier, P. (2005). How brains beware: Neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends Cognitive Science, 9 (12), 585-594.
[54] Wang, Y. N., Zhou, L. M., & Luo, J. Y. (2008). The pilot establishment and evaluation of Chinese affective words system. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22(8), 608-612.
[ 王一牛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉. (2008). 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22(8), 608-612.]
[55] Watson, L. A., Dritschel, B., Obonsawin, M. C., & Jentzsch, I. (2007). Seeing yourself in a positive light: Brain correlates of the self-positivity bias. Brain Research, 1152, 106-110.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.049URLpmid: 17462610
[56] Watson, R. S. (1986). The named and the nameless: Gender and person in Chinese society. American Ethnologist, 13 (4), 619-631.
[57] Zhou, H. Y., Guo, J. L., Ma, X. M., Zhang, M. H., Liu, L. Q., Feng, L. … Zhong, N. (2017). Self-reference emerges earlier than emotion during an implicit self-referential emotion processing task: Event-related potential evidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 451.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00451URLpmid: 28943845




[1]付艺蕾, 罗跃嘉, 崔芳. 选择一致性影响结果评价的ERP研究[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(8): 1089-1099.
[2]钟毅平;李琎;占友龙;范伟;杨子鹿. 自我旋转面孔识别的ERPs研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(11): 1379-1389.
[3]窦伟伟;郑希付;杨慧芳;王俊芳;李悦;俄小天;陈倩倩. 认知分心的强度对创伤性信息加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 656-665.
[4]吴燕,周晓林. 公平加工的情境依赖性:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(6): 797-806.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4776
相关话题/心理 信息 辽宁师范大学 科学 词汇