删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

群体认同对群际敏感效应及其行为表现的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

宋仕婕1,2, 佐斌1,2, 温芳芳1,2(), 谭潇1
1华中师范大学心理学院暨社会心理研究中心
2青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079
收稿日期:2019-12-30出版日期:2020-08-25发布日期:2020-06-28
通讯作者:温芳芳E-mail:wenff@mail.ccnu.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA331);教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目资助(17JZD043)

The intergroup sensitivity effect and its behavioral consequences: The influence of group identification

SONG Shijie1,2, ZUO Bin1,2, WEN Fangang1,2(), TAN Xiao1
1School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Social Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
Received:2019-12-30Online:2020-08-25Published:2020-06-28
Contact:WEN Fangang E-mail:wenff@mail.ccnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 通过实验研究了群际互动中个体对不同来源身份的消极群体评价的情绪反应及群体认同的调节作用, 并从情绪-行为反应的连续性视角探索群际敏感效应的行为表现及内在机制。结果发现:(1)相比内群体的消极群体评价, 外群体的消极群体评价更能引起消极情绪反应; (2)群体认同对群际敏感效应起调节作用, 高群体认同者对来自外群体消极评价的情绪反应更加负面, 而低群体认同者这种趋势并不明显; (3)高群体认同者在经历外群体的消极群体评价后会表现出更多的内群体积极行为, 且消极情绪反应对此起中介作用。研究扩展了群际敏感效应的适用范围, 并为探讨其内部机制和后续影响提供了新的研究思路。



图1消极情绪的中介作用及群体认同的调节作用假设模型图
图1消极情绪的中介作用及群体认同的调节作用假设模型图



图2不同来源身份和群体认同条件下的消极情绪反应 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
图2不同来源身份和群体认同条件下的消极情绪反应 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001



图3不同来源身份和群体认同条件下的消极情绪反应 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
图3不同来源身份和群体认同条件下的消极情绪反应 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001



图4不同来源身份和认同条件下的内群体积极行为 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
图4不同来源身份和认同条件下的内群体积极行为 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001


表1消极评价来源身份对内群体积极行为的有中介的调节效应检验
变量 方程1 方程2 方程3
(因变量:内群体积极行为) (因变量:消极情绪) (因变量:内群体积极行为)
β SE t β SE t β SE t
来源身份 0.44** 0.06 6.88 0.35** 0.06 5.64 0.21** 0.06 3.81
群体认同 0.39** 0.06 6.20 0.51** 0.06 8.28 0.06 0.06 0.96
来源身份×群体认同 0.29** 0.06 4.33 0.28** 0.06 4.62 0.10 0.05 1.77
情绪反应 0.66** 0.07 9.58
R2 0.45 0.48 0.67
F 36.38** 41.98** 68.77**

表1消极评价来源身份对内群体积极行为的有中介的调节效应检验
变量 方程1 方程2 方程3
(因变量:内群体积极行为) (因变量:消极情绪) (因变量:内群体积极行为)
β SE t β SE t β SE t
来源身份 0.44** 0.06 6.88 0.35** 0.06 5.64 0.21** 0.06 3.81
群体认同 0.39** 0.06 6.20 0.51** 0.06 8.28 0.06 0.06 0.96
来源身份×群体认同 0.29** 0.06 4.33 0.28** 0.06 4.62 0.10 0.05 1.77
情绪反应 0.66** 0.07 9.58
R2 0.45 0.48 0.67
F 36.38** 41.98** 68.77**



图5消极评价来源身份对内群体积极行为的有中介的调节路径图 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, 实线表示路径显著
图5消极评价来源身份对内群体积极行为的有中介的调节路径图 注:*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, 实线表示路径显著







[1] Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Self and social identity(pp. 147-181). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
URLpmid: 27683200
[2] Adelman, L., & Dasgupta, N. (2019). Effect of threat and social identity on reactions to ingroup criticism: defensiveness, openness, and a remedy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5), 740-753.
doi: 10.1177/0146167218796785URLpmid: 30270735
[3] Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (2010). United we stand: Intergroup conflict moderates the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40 (1), 169-177.
[4] Bagci, S. C., Turnuklu, A., & Bekmezci, E. (2018). The buffering role of in-group identification and intergroup contact on the association between perceived discrimination and mental health. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 28 (5), 293-305.
[5] Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology & Organizational Behavior, 2 (1), 21-46.
[6] Cohen, D., & Gunz, A. (2002). As seen by the other…: Perspectives on the self in the memories and emotional perceptions of Easterners and Westerners. Psychological Science, 13 (1), 55-59.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00409URLpmid: 11892778
[7] Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS Map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (4), 631-648.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631URLpmid: 17469949
[8] de Hoog, N. (2013). Processing of social identity threats: A defense motivation perspective. Social Psychology, 44 (6), 361-372.
[9] Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. A. (2012). Social identity theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 379-98). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
[10] Esposo, S. R., Hornsey, M. J., & Spoor, J. R. (2013). Shooting the messenger: Outsiders critical of your group are rejected regardless of argument quality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52 (2), 386-395.
doi: 10.1111/bjso.12024URLpmid: 23316747
[11] Garcia, S. M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G. B., & Darley, J. M. (2002). Crowded minds: the implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (4), 843-853.
URLpmid: 12374439
[12] Guan, J. (2011). Complexities of social identity and strategies for social identity management. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science), (2), 96-102.
[ 管健. (2011). 社会认同复杂性与认同管理策略探析. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), (2), 96-102.]
[13] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
[14] Hirsh, J. B., & Kang, S. K. (2016). Mechanisms of identity conflict: Uncertainty, anxiety, and the behavioral inhibition system. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20 (3), 223-244.
doi: 10.1177/1088868315589475URLpmid: 26048875
[15] Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social identity theory. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory: Contemporary global perspectives (pp. 3-17). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
[16] Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., Harrison, K., Cassidy, C., Bull, R., & Levine, M. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (6), 776-788.
doi: 10.1177/0146167207301023URLpmid: 17483397
[17] Hornsey, M. J., Bruijn, P. D., Creed, J., Allen, J., Ariyanto, A., & Svensson, A. (2005). Keeping it in-house: Howaudience affects responses to group criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35 (3), 291-312.
[18] Hornsey, M. J., & Esposo, S. (2009). Resistance to group criticism and recommendations for change: Lessons from the intergroup sensitivity effect. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3 (1), 275-291.
[19] Hornsey, M. J., Grice, T., Jetten, J., Paulsen, N., & Callan, V. (2007). Group-directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old- timers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (7), 1036-1048.
doi: 10.1177/0146167207301029URLpmid: 17557893
[20] Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (3), 365-383.
doi: 10.1177/0146167203261295URLpmid: 15030626
[21] Hornsey, M. J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). “It's OK if we say it, but you can't”: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32 (3), 293-4307.
[22] Hornsey, M. J., Robson, E., Smith, J., Esposo, S., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). Sugaring the pill: Assessing rhetorical strategies designed to minimize defensive reactions to group criticism. Human Communication Research, 34 (1), 70-98.
[23] Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (4), 572-587.
URLpmid: 17400836
[24] Jetten, J., & Hornsey, M. J. (2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 461-485.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151URLpmid: 23751035
[25] Jetten, J., Iyer, A., Tsivrikos, D., & Young, B. M. (2008). When is individual mobility costly? The role of economic and social identity factors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38 (5), 866-879.
[26] Kulich, C., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Iacoviello, V., Faniko, K., & Ryan, M. K. (2015). Signaling change during a crisis: Re?ning conditions for the glass cliff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 61, 96-103.
[27] Lindner, N. M., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Alienable speech: Ideological variations in the application of free-speech principles. Political Psychology, 30 (1), 67-92.
[28] Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18 (3), 302-318.
doi: 10.1177/0146167292183006URL
[29] Lv, X., Zhong, N., Tian, B., & Shu, S. L. (2017). The influence of different types of intergroup threat on collective self- esteem: The mediating effect of two kinds of emotions. Journal of Psychological Science, 40 (3), 632-637.
[ 吕行, 钟年, 田波, 舒首立. (2017). 不同群际威胁类型对集体自尊的影响: 愤怒和自卑的中介作用. 心理科学, 40 (3), 632-637.]
[30] Martiny, S. E., & Nikitin, J. (2019). Social identity threat in interpersonal relationships: Activating negative stereotypes decreases social approach motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 25 (1), 117.
doi: 10.1037/xap0000198URLpmid: 30321023
[31] McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (8), 1005-1017.
doi: 10.1177/0146167203253466URLpmid: 15189619
[32] Moscatelli, S., Prati, F., & Rubini, M. (2019). If you criticize us, do it in concrete terms: Linguistic abstraction as a moderator of the intergroup sensitivity effect. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38 (5-6), 680-705.
[33] Norton, M. I., Monin, B., Cooper, J., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Vicarious dissonance: Attitude change from the inconsistency of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85 (1), 47-62.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.47URLpmid: 12872884
[34] Otten, S. (2016). The minimal group paradigm and its maximal impact in research on social categorization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 85-89.
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.010URL
[35] Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). The five “A” s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning in the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry, 23 (4), 317-335.
doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.702372URL
[36] Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. (2010). Who says we are bad people? The impact of criticism source and attributional content on responses to group-based criticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (4), 524-536.
doi: 10.1177/0146167210362980URLpmid: 20363906
[37] Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. (2012). Sizing fish and ponds: The joint effects of individual-and group-based feedback. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48 (1), 244-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.017URL
[38] Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. (2015). Things we (don't) want to hear: Exploring responses to group-based feedback. European Review of Social Psychology, 26 (1), 126-161.
doi: 10.1080/10463283.2015.1115214URL
[39] Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., & Sassenberg, K. (2013). Power in group contexts: The influence of group status on promotion and prevention decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52 (2), 238-254.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02063.xURLpmid: 21950319
[40] Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Tausch, N., Cairns, E., & Hughes, J. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity: Intergroup contact, distinctiveness threat, and outgroup attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35 (8), 1085-1098.
doi: 10.1177/0146167209337037URLpmid: 19506033
[41] Smart Richman, L., Blodorn, A., & Major, B. (2016). An identity-based motivational model of the effects of perceived discrimination on health-related behaviors. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19 (4), 415-425.
[42] Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., Elder, T. J., & Tarrant, M. (2008). Social identity and social convention in responses to criticisms of groups. In Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, & P. Freytag (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to stereotype formation, maintenance, and transformation .(pp. 345-372). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[43] Sutton, R. M., Elder, T. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2006). Reactions to internal and external criticism of outgroups: Social convention in the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32 (5), 563-575.
doi: 10.1177/0146167205282992URLpmid: 16702151
[44] Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992URL
[45] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
[46] Tausch, N., Saguy, T., & Bryson, J. (2015). How does intergroup contact affect social change? Its impact on collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71 (3), 536-553.
doi: 10.1111/josi.12127URL
[47] Thai, M., Borgella, A. M., & Sanchez, M. S. (2019). It's only funny if we say it: Disparagement humor is better received if it originates from a member of the group being disparaged. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103838.
[48] Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Self-categorization theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & T. E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology(pp. 399-417). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
[49] van, Leeuwen, E., & Tauber, S. (2012). Outgroup helping as a tool to communicate ingroup warmth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 772-783.
doi: 10.1177/0146167211436253URLpmid: 22399362
[50] Wang, Q., & Yu, G. (2016). The relationship between group identification and individual mental health: Moderating variables and mechanisms. Advances in Psychological Science, 24 (8), 1300-1308.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01300URL
[ 王勍, 俞国良. (2016). 群体认同与个体心理健康的关系: 调节变量与作用机制. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1300-1308.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01300URL
[51] Wang, Z. J., Hou, Y. R., Kuang, Y., & Tang, H. Y. (2017). The amplification effect of group-shared emotion. Advances in Psychological Science, 25 (4), 662-671.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00662URL
[ 汪祚军, 侯怡如, 匡仪, 唐辉一, 赵珍珍, 陈红霞. (2017). 群体共享情绪的放大效应. 心理科学进展, 25(4), 662-671.]
[52] Weisbuch, M., & Ambady, N. (2008). Affective divergence: automatic responses to others' emotions depend on group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1063-1079.
doi: 10.1037/a0011993URLpmid: 18954194
[53] Wen, F. F., & Zuo, B. (2018). The minimal group paradigm: Operation, psychological mechanism and new application. Journal of Psychological Science, 41 (3), 713-719.
[ 温芳芳, 佐斌. (2018). 最简群体范式的操作, 心理机制及新应用. 心理科学, 41(3), 713-719.]
[54] Zagefka, H., Binder, J., Brown, R., & Hancock, L. (2013). Who is to blame? The relationship between ingroup identification and relative deprivation is moderated by ingroup attributions. Social Psychology, 44 (6), 398-407.
doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000153URL
[55] Zaroff, C., D'Amato, R. C., & Bender, H. A. (2014). Understanding differences in cognition across the lifespan: Comparing eastern and western cultures. In Neuropsychology of Asians and Asian-Americans(pp. 91-116). Springer, New York, NY.
[56] Zhang, R. K., & Guo, Y. Y. (2009). A review of the research on self-criticism personality. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition), 35 (6), 15-21.
[ 章若昆, 郭永玉. (2009). 自我批评人格及其对社会适应的影响. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 35 (6), 15-21.]
[57] Zhang, Y., & Zuo, B. (2006). Social identity theory and it's development. Advances in Psychological Science, 14 (03), 475-480.
[ 张莹瑞, 佐斌. (2006). 社会认同理论及其发展. 心理科学进展, 14 (03), 475-480.]




[1]吕飒飒, 孙欣, 沈林林, 武雨晴, 赵纾, 王霏, 汪祚军. 群体共同经历影响不公平感知[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 773-787.
[2]殷融;张菲菲;王元元;臧日霞. 当抗议遭遇挫折:集体行动失利情境下情绪反应对行动意愿的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(4): 482-499.
[3]王益文;张振; 张蔚;黄亮;郭丰波;原胜. 群体身份调节最后通牒博弈的公平关注[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(12): 1850-1859.
[4]刘霞;赵景欣;申继亮. 歧视知觉对城市流动儿童幸福感的影响:中介机制及归属需要的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(5): 568-584.
[5]张书维. 群际威胁与集群行为意向:群体性事件的双路径模型[J]. 心理学报, 2013, 45(12): 1410-1430 .
[6]张书维,王二平,周洁. 跨情境下集群行为的动因机制[J]. 心理学报, 2012, 44(4): 524-545.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4780
相关话题/心理 科学 社会科学 检验 社会