删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

大道至“简”:极简主义消费内涵解构与理论阐释

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

陈斯允1(), 卫海英1,2(), 熊继伟1, 冉雅璇3
1暨南大学管理学院, 广州 510632
2广州品牌创新发展研究基地, 广州 510632
3中南财经政法大学工商管理学院, 武汉 430073
收稿日期:2021-01-18出版日期:2021-11-15发布日期:2021-09-23
通讯作者:陈斯允,卫海英E-mail:tweihy@jnu.edu.cn;chensiyun2016@163.com

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71772077);国家自然科学基金项目(71802192);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(18YJC630137)

Less is more: A theoretical interpretation of minimalism in consumption

CHEN Siyun1(), WEI Haiying1,2(), XIONG Jiwei1, RAN Yaxuan3
1School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2Research Institute on Brand Innovation and Development of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510632, China
3School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
Received:2021-01-18Online:2021-11-15Published:2021-09-23
Contact:CHEN Siyun,WEI Haiying E-mail:tweihy@jnu.edu.cn;chensiyun2016@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 随着经济社会的不断发展与物质生活的日益丰富, 一股消费“清流”——极简主义消费愈来愈受到学界和业界的共同关注。极简主义消费是人们出于社会意识或个人理念而自发采取的一种“从简”式消费行为, 覆盖个人、社会和自然各个层面。受人口变量、心理特质、情境线索和宗教文化等因素驱动, 极简主义消费对个体心理健康与行为决策产生重要影响。基本价值理论、自我决定理论、需求层次理论和自我调节理论是认识和理解极简主义消费形成路径与影响机制的重要理论视角。未来研究可进一步厘清极简主义消费的构念与维度内涵, 采用科学流程开发测量工具, 深化本土化和跨文化研究, 并从多元理论视角, 综合运用不同实证方法, 深入探索其前因后效、心理机制和边界条件。


表1极简主义消费的内涵界定及其来源文献
文献来源 界定视角 内涵
Leonard-Barton (1981) 目标视角 有利于资源节约、生态保护的责任性消费行为
Etzioni (1998) 资源视角 增强对生活的控制性和决定性的自愿行为
Huneke (2005) 资源视角 遵循人的自由意志下控制消费欲望的自主性行为
Shaw & Moraes
(2009)
目标视角 由环境友好型消费而形成的可持续发展的个体活动
Kasser (2011) 目标视角 缓解“物质富裕”和“时间贫穷”生活现状的方法
Alexander &
Ussher (2012)
资源视角 节约金钱和时间而为自我成长投入更多的精力的活动
McGouran &
Prothero (2016)
目标视角 使个人的时间和金钱不受约束的自发性行为
Peyer et al. (2017) 目标视角 依据自我意愿且促进社会和环境效益的系列活动
Khamis (2019) 资源视角 将消费数量控制在合理范围内并更多地考虑社会效益的消费方式
Peifer et al. (2020) 目标视角 追求将自我成就和价值与社会福祉统一的道德性消费方式

表1极简主义消费的内涵界定及其来源文献
文献来源 界定视角 内涵
Leonard-Barton (1981) 目标视角 有利于资源节约、生态保护的责任性消费行为
Etzioni (1998) 资源视角 增强对生活的控制性和决定性的自愿行为
Huneke (2005) 资源视角 遵循人的自由意志下控制消费欲望的自主性行为
Shaw & Moraes
(2009)
目标视角 由环境友好型消费而形成的可持续发展的个体活动
Kasser (2011) 目标视角 缓解“物质富裕”和“时间贫穷”生活现状的方法
Alexander &
Ussher (2012)
资源视角 节约金钱和时间而为自我成长投入更多的精力的活动
McGouran &
Prothero (2016)
目标视角 使个人的时间和金钱不受约束的自发性行为
Peyer et al. (2017) 目标视角 依据自我意愿且促进社会和环境效益的系列活动
Khamis (2019) 资源视角 将消费数量控制在合理范围内并更多地考虑社会效益的消费方式
Peifer et al. (2020) 目标视角 追求将自我成就和价值与社会福祉统一的道德性消费方式


表2极简主义消费的维度及其覆盖范畴
来源文献 维度数 维度内容 测项数 个体范畴 社会范畴 自然范畴
Huneke (2005) 3 ①生态与社会责任 ②社区性 ③精神生活 21 ①②
Rich et al. (2017) 3 ①节俭 ②可持续性 ③自给自足 11 ①③ ②③
Wilson & Bellezza
(2021)
3 ①减少拥有物数量 ②审美简约 ③谨慎消费 12 ①②③
Iwata (1997) 4 ①简约生活方式 ②谨慎购物态度 ③自给自足 ④反对复杂花哨的产品 20 ①②③④
Altinbasak-Farina &
Burnaz (2019)
4 ①责任性消费 ②本土消费 ③精神追求与情感联结 ④去媒介化 11 ③④ ①②③
Shama (1985) 6 ①简化物质 ②小即是美 ③产品或服务功能价值 ④自我决定 ⑤个人成长 ⑥生态意识 18 ①④⑤ ②③④
Leonard-Barton
(1981)
6 ①绿色出行 ②服务自给自足 ③产品自给自足 ④回收资源 ⑤回收产品 ⑥亲近大自然 18 ②③ ②③ ①④⑤⑥
Rich et al. (2020) 6 ①资源 ②采购 ③自给自足 ④恩惠 ⑤简化物质 ⑥工作生活权衡 21 ③⑤⑥ ②③④ ①②

表2极简主义消费的维度及其覆盖范畴
来源文献 维度数 维度内容 测项数 个体范畴 社会范畴 自然范畴
Huneke (2005) 3 ①生态与社会责任 ②社区性 ③精神生活 21 ①②
Rich et al. (2017) 3 ①节俭 ②可持续性 ③自给自足 11 ①③ ②③
Wilson & Bellezza
(2021)
3 ①减少拥有物数量 ②审美简约 ③谨慎消费 12 ①②③
Iwata (1997) 4 ①简约生活方式 ②谨慎购物态度 ③自给自足 ④反对复杂花哨的产品 20 ①②③④
Altinbasak-Farina &
Burnaz (2019)
4 ①责任性消费 ②本土消费 ③精神追求与情感联结 ④去媒介化 11 ③④ ①②③
Shama (1985) 6 ①简化物质 ②小即是美 ③产品或服务功能价值 ④自我决定 ⑤个人成长 ⑥生态意识 18 ①④⑤ ②③④
Leonard-Barton
(1981)
6 ①绿色出行 ②服务自给自足 ③产品自给自足 ④回收资源 ⑤回收产品 ⑥亲近大自然 18 ②③ ②③ ①④⑤⑥
Rich et al. (2020) 6 ①资源 ②采购 ③自给自足 ④恩惠 ⑤简化物质 ⑥工作生活权衡 21 ③⑤⑥ ②③④ ①②



图1极简主义消费的前因、后效及其中介变量与边界条件示意图 注:↑表正向影响, ↓表负向影响, ×表结果不一致。 资料来源:根据文献整理。
图1极简主义消费的前因、后效及其中介变量与边界条件示意图 注:↑表正向影响, ↓表负向影响, ×表结果不一致。 资料来源:根据文献整理。



图2四种理论视角下极简主义消费的相关要素及形成过程
图2四种理论视角下极简主义消费的相关要素及形成过程







[1] 陈斯允, 卫海英, 孟陆. (2019). 社会知觉视角下道德诉求方式如何提升劝捐效果. 心理学报, 51(12), 1351-1362.
[2] 陈斯允, 卫海英, 冉雅璇, 孟陆. (2020). “重振旗鼓”还是“重蹈覆辙”--新起点思维与品牌危机类型对消费者宽恕的影响. 南开管理评论, 23(4), 49-59+83.
[3] 宫秀双, 蒋晶. (2018). 撞衫对消费者产品处置意向的影响及其心理机制. 心理学报, 50(3), 337-348.
[4] 黄梓航, 敬一鸣, 喻丰, 古若雷, 周欣悦, 张建新, 蔡华俭. (2018). 个人主义上升, 集体主义式微?--全球文化变迁与民众心理变化. 心理科学进展, 26(11), 2068-2080.
[5] 冉雅璇, 卫海英, 李清, 雷超. (2018). 心理学视角下的人类仪式: 一种意义深远的重复动作. 心理科学进展, 26(1), 169-179.
[6] 奚路阳. (2015). “无牌”成就“大牌”--论极简主义在无印良品品牌与产品设计中的运用. 新闻界, 12, 43-47.
[7] 朱振中, 刘福, Haipeng (Allan) Chen. (2020). 能力还是热情?广告诉求对消费者品牌认同和购买意向的影响. 心理学报, 52(3), 357-370.
[8] Alexander, S. (2013). Voluntary simplicity and the social reconstruction of law: Degrowth from the grassroots up. Environmental Values, 22(2), 287-308.
doi: 10.3197/096327113X13581561725356URL
[9] Alexander, S., & Ussher, S. (2012). The voluntary simplicity movement: A multi-national survey analysis in theoretical context. Journal of Consumer Culture, 12(1), 66-86.
doi: 10.1177/1469540512444019URL
[10] Altinbasak-Farina, I., & Burnaz, S.(Eds.). (2019). Ethics, Social Responsibility and Sustainability in Marketing. Springer.
[11] Boujbel, L., & d'Astous, A. (2012). Voluntary simplicity and life satisfaction: Exploring the mediating role of consumption desires. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(6), 487-494.
doi: 10.1002/cb.v11.6URL
[12] Boutroy, E. (2020). Minimalism and lightweight backpacking in France: A material culture of detachment. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(4), 357-372.
[13] Bove, L. L., Nagpal, A., & Dorsett, A. D. S. (2009). Exploring the determinants of the frugal shopper. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 291-297.
doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.02.004URL
[14] Chen, S., Wei, H., Meng, L., & Ran, Y. (2019). Believing in karma: The effect of mortality salience on excessive consumption, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1519.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01519URL
[15] Chowdhury, R. M. M. I. (2018). Religiosity and voluntary simplicity: The mediating role of spiritual well-being. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(1), 149-174.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3305-5URL
[16] Cooke, A. N., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Environmentally active people: The role of autonomy, relatedness, competence and self-determined motivation. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 631-657.
doi: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1054262URL
[17] Craig-Lees, M., & Hill, C. (2002). Understanding voluntary simplifiers. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 187-210.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793URL
[18] de Mendonça, O., G., Rocha, A. R. C., & da costa Tayt‐Son, D. B. (2020). The minimalist process: An interpretivist study. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 12(1), 1-11.
doi: 10.1002/cb.v12.1URL
[19] Elgaaïed-Gambier, L. (2016). Who buys overpackaged grocery products and why? Understanding consumers’ reactions to overpackaging in the food sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(4), 683-698.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2491-2URL
[20] Elliston, K. G., Ferguson, S. G., & Schüz, B. (2017). Personal and situational predictors of everyday snacking: An application of temporal self-regulation theory. British Journal of Health Psychology, 22(4), 854-871.
doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12259URL
[21] Etzioni, A. (1998). Voluntary simplicity: Characterization, select psychological implications, and societal consequences, Journal of Economic Psychology, 19, 619-643.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00021-XURL
[22] García-de-Frutos, N., Ortega-Egea, J. M., & Martínez-del-Río, J. (2018). Anti-consumption for environmental sustainability: Conceptualization, review, and multilevel research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 411-435.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3023-zURL
[23] Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., Cherry, M., & Watkins, M. (2019). Moral, wasteful, frugal, or thrifty? Identifying consumer identities to understand and manage pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(1), 24-49.
doi: 10.1177/0013916517733782
[24] Haenfler, R., Johnson, B., & Jones, E. (2012). Lifestyle movements: Exploring the intersection of lifestyle and social movements. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 1-20.
doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.640535URL
[25] Herziger, A., Berkessel, J. B., & Steinnes, K. K. (2020). Wean off green: On the (in) effectiveness of biospheric appeals for consumption curtailment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101415.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101415URL
[26] Hoffmann, S., Balderjahn, I., Seegebarth, B., Mai, R., & Peyer, M. (2018). Under which conditions are consumers ready to boycott or buycott? The roles of hedonism and simplicity. Ecological Economics, 147, 167-178.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.004URL
[27] Huneke, M. E. (2005). The face of the un‐consumer: An empirical examination of the practice of voluntary simplicity in the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 22(7), 527- 550.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793URL
[28] Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735-762.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4URL
[29] Hüttel, A., Balderjahn, I., & Hoffmann, S. (2020). Welfare beyond consumption: The benefits of having less. Ecological Economics, 176, 106719.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106719URL
[30] Iwata, O. (1997). Attitudinal and behavioral correlates of voluntary simplicity lifestyles. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 25(3), 233-240.
doi: 10.2224/sbp.1997.25.3.233URL
[31] Jackson, T. (2005). Live better by consuming less? Is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1-2), 19-36.
[32] Kahl, K. (2012). “My God wants me to live simply”: The constructed selfhood of faith‐based simple livers. Symbolic Interaction, 35(3), 249-266.
doi: 10.1002/symb.20URL
[33] Kannisto, P. (2018). Travelling like locals: Market resistance in long-term travel. Tourism Management, 67, 297-306.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.009URL
[34] Kasser, T. (2011). Can thrift bring well-being? A review of the research and a tentative theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(11), 865-877.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00396.xURL
[35] Kasser, T. (2017). Living both well and sustainably: A review of the literature, with some reflections on future research, interventions and policy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160369.
doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0369URL
[36] Khamis, S. (2019). The aestheticization of restraint: The popular appeal of de-cluttering after the global financial crisis. Journal of Consumer Culture, 19(4), 513-531.
doi: 10.1177/1469540519872071
[37] Kramarczyk, J., & Oliver, M. A. (2020). Accumulative vs. appreciative expressions of materialism: Revising materialism in light of polish simplifiers and new materialism. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 1-19.
doi: 10.1007/BF00382557URL
[38] Kropfeld, M. I., Nepomuceno, M. V., & Dantas, D. C. (2018). The ecological impact of anti-consumption lifestyles and environmental concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 245-259.
[39] Kuanr, A., Pradhan, D., & Chaudhuri, H. R. (2020). I (do not) consume; therefore, I am: Investigating materialism and voluntary simplicity through a moderated mediation model. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 260-277.
doi: 10.1002/mar.v37.2URL
[40] Kudret, S., Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2019). Self- monitoring personality trait at work: An integrative narrative review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 193-208.
doi: 10.1002/job.2346
[41] Kulow, K., & Kramer, T. (2016). In pursuit of good karma: When charitable appeals to do right go wrong. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(2), 334-353.
doi: 10.1093/jcr/ucw018URL
[42] Lee, M. S. W., Ortega Egea, J. M., & de Frutos, N. G. (2020). Anti-consumption beyond boundaries: From niche topic to global phenomena. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 171- 176.
doi: 10.1002/mar.v37.2URL
[43] Lee, S., Winterich, K. P., & Ross, W. T. (2014). I'm moral, but I won't help you: The distinct roles of empathy and justice in donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 678-696.
doi: 10.1086/677226URL
[44] Leonard-Barton, D. (1981). Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 243-252.
doi: 10.1086/jcr.1981.8.issue-3URL
[45] Lloyd, K., & Pennington, W. (2020). Towards a theory of minimalism and wellbeing. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 2, 121-136.
[46] Lorenzen, J. A. (2018). Social network challenges to reducing consumption: The problem of gift giving. Symbolic Interaction, 41(2), 247-266.
doi: 10.1002/symb.2018.41.issue-2URL
[47] Makri, K., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Mai, R., & Dinhof, K. (2020). What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 177-215.
doi: 10.1002/mar.v37.2URL
[48] McGouran, C., & Prothero, A. (2016). Enacted voluntary simplicity - exploring the consequences of requesting consumers to intentionally consume less. European Journal of Marketing, 50(1/2), 189-212.
doi: 10.1108/EJM-09-2013-0521URL
[49] Meissner, M. (2019). Against accumulation: lifestyle minimalism, de-growth and the present post-ecological condition. Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 185-200.
doi: 10.1080/17530350.2019.1570962
[50] Mick, D. G. (2017). Buddhist psychology: Selected insights, benefits, and research agenda for consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 117-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.04.003URL
[51] Nepomuceno, M. V., & Laroche, M. (2015). The impact of materialism and anti-consumption lifestyles on personal debt and account balances. Journal of Business Research, 68(3), 654-664.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.08.006URL
[52] Nepomuceno, M. V., & Laroche, M. (2017). When materialists intend to resist consumption: The moderating role of self-control and long-term orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(3), 467-483.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2792-0URL
[53] Peifer, J. L., Chugani, S., & Roos, J. M. (2020). The ethical underpinnings of nonmaterialistic values and voluntary simplicity behavior in the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 232-249.
doi: 10.1002/mar.v37.2URL
[54] Pelikán, V., Galčanová, L., & Kala, L. (2020). Ecological habitus intergenerationally reproduced: The children of czech ‘voluntary simplifiers’ and their lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Culture, 20(4), 419-439.
doi: 10.1177/1469540517736560URL
[55] Pepper, M., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 126-136.
doi: 10.1111/ijc.2009.33.issue-2URL
[56] Peyer, M., Balderjahn, I., Seegebarth, B., & Klemm, A. (2017). The role of sustainability in profiling voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Business Research, 70, 37-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.07.008URL
[57] Price, L. L., Arnould, E. J., & Curasi, C. F. (2000). Older consumers' disposition of special possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 179-201.
doi: 10.1086/314319URL
[58] Rebouças, R., & Soares, A. M. (2020). Voluntary simplicity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(3), 303-319. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12621
doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12621URL
[59] Rich, S. A., Hanna, S., & Wright, B. J. (2017). Simply satisfied: The role of psychological need satisfaction in the life satisfaction of voluntary simplifiers. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(1), 89-105.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9718-0URL
[60] Rich, S. A., Hanna, S., Wright, B. J., & Bennett, P. C. (2017). Fact or fable: Increased wellbeing in voluntary simplicity. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(2), 64-77.
doi: 10.5502/ijwURL
[61] Rich, S. A., Wright, B. J., & Bennett, P. C. (2020). Development of the voluntary simplicity engagement scale: Measuring low-consumption lifestyles. Journal of Consumer Policy, 43, 295-313.
doi: 10.1007/s10603-018-9400-5URL
[62] Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., ... Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663-688.
pmid: 22823292
[63] Shama, A. (1985). The voluntary simplicity consumer. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2(4), 57-63.
doi: 10.1108/eb008146URL
[64] Shaw, D., & Moraes, C. (2009). Voluntary simplicity: An exploration of market interactions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 215-223.
doi: 10.1111/ijc.2009.33.issue-2URL
[65] Shaw, D., & Newholm, T. (2002). Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 167-185.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793URL
[66] Stoeckl, V. E., & Luedicke, M. K. (2015). Doing well while doing good? An integrative review of marketing criticism and response. Journal of Business Research, 68(12), 2452-2463.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.032URL
[67] Tang, Y., & Hinsch, C. (2018). Going green to be morally clean: An examination of environmental behavior among materialistic consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 35(11), 845-862.
doi: 10.1002/mar.21139URL
[68] Wahlen, S., & Laamanen, M. (2015). Consumption, lifestyle and social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 397-403.
doi: 10.1111/ijcs.2015.39.issue-5URL
[69] Wilson, A. V., & Bellezza, S. (2021). Consumer minimalism. Journal of Consumer Research, ucab038, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab038
[70] Wu, D. E., Thomas, J., Moore, M., & Carroll, K. (2013). Voluntary simplicity: The great American apparel diet. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17(3), 294-305.
doi: 10.1108/JFMM-05-2012-0020URL
[71] Zavestoski, S. (2002). The social-psychological bases of anti-consumption attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 19(2), 149-165.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793URL




[1]崔馨月, 李斌, 贺汝婉, 张淑颖, 雷励. 亲社会支出对主观幸福感的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1279-1290.
[2]彭家敏, 谢礼珊, 关新华. 虚拟健康社区医生贡献行为的形成机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 978-989.
[3]陈浩彬, 汪凤炎. 老年人的智慧[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 885-893.
[4]孙俊芳, 辛自强, 包呼格吉乐图, 刘敏, 岳衡. 幸福感的稳态与跃迁:一个新的整合视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 481-491.
[5]叶静, 张戌凡. 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 202-217.
[6]陈晨, 刘玉新, 赵晨. 独立、协同和平衡视角下的单维式基本心理需要满足[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2076-2090.
[7]杜健. 自我概念一致性与幸福感间的关系:文化的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1751-1761.
[8]张戌凡, 席猛. 工会实践对员工工作幸福感的影响:基于工具-情感的双路径视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1354-1362.
[9]张春虎. 基于自我决定理论的工作动机研究脉络及未来走向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1489-1506.
[10]龚艳萍, 陈卓, 谢菊兰, 谢笑春. 手机冷落行为的前因、后果与作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1258-1267.
[11]傅绪荣, 魏新东, 王予灵, 汪凤炎. 智慧与幸福感的关系:基于多元幸福取向的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 544-556.
[12]余樱, 景奉杰, 杨艳. 怎样花钱更幸福?购买类型对幸福感的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2133-2140.
[13]柴唤友, 牛更枫, 褚晓伟, 魏 祺, 宋玉红, 孙晓军. 错失恐惧:我又错过了什么?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 527-537.
[14]丁凤琴, 赵虎英. 感恩的个体主观幸福感更强?—— 一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(10): 1749-1763.
[15]晏小华, 刘振亮, 王祥坤, 沐守宽. 幸福悖论及其最新解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(1): 180-189.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5623
相关话题/心理 科学 资源 文献 社会