删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

海量信息如何影响跨期决策?基于注意资源的理论视角

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

李爱梅1(), 车敬上1, 刘楠1, 孙海龙2, 周玮1
1暨南大学管理学院, 广州 510632
2广东外语外贸大学, 广州 510420
收稿日期:2020-12-17发布日期:2021-07-22
通讯作者:李爱梅E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71971099);广东省自然科学基金重大项目(2017A030308013)

How does massive information affect intertemporal choice? A theoretical perspective based on attentional resources

LI Aimei1(), CHE Jingshang1, LIU Nan1, SUN Hailong2, ZHOU Wei1
1Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2School of Business, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China
Received:2020-12-17Published:2021-07-22
Contact:LI Aimei E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 信息过少容易使人成为井底之蛙, 不利于做出高质量的决策; 那拥有更多信息是否就能做出更高质量、有远见的决策呢?已有研究发现海量信息导致注意资源稀缺, 注意资源对跨期决策至关重要, 但海量信息如何影响跨期决策的内在机制尚不明确。本研究基于注意资源的理论视角提出:海量信息加剧注意资源的稀缺, 一方面当前信息捕获过多注意资源, 导致指向未来的注意资源减少, 造成模拟未来不清晰、预测未来不准确, 意图形成减少; 另一方面增加对时间紧迫性的关注, 减少为长远未来做计划的意愿, 导致在跨期权衡中更偏好近期选项。长期导向的特质可以使个体将注意聚焦于长远收益, 做出更有远见的决策。研究结果将科学地解释海量信息影响跨期决策的内在机制, 并为进一步探讨助推海量信息环境下有远见的跨期决策提供理论与实证依据。



图1海量信息影响跨期决策的理论模型
图1海量信息影响跨期决策的理论模型







[1] 车敬上, 孙海龙, 肖晨洁, 李爱梅. (2019). 为什么信息超载损害决策?基于有限认知资源的解释. 心理科学进展, 27(10), 1758-1768.
[2] 何贵兵, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2018). 以小拨大: 行为决策助推社会发展. 心理学报, 50(8), 803-813.
[3] 何玉杰, 余敬. (2020). 非工作时间电子沟通对员工时间侵占行为的影响: 基于资源保存理论视角. 中国人力资源开发, 37(1), 54-67.
[4] 黄元娜, 魏子晗, 沈丝楚, 王晓田, 葛列众, 何贵兵, 李纾. (2017). 互联网海量信息环境对人类决策提出的挑战及其应对方式. 应用心理学, 23(3), 195-209.
[5] 霍伟伟, 龚靖雅, 李鲜苗, 聂晶. (2020). 主动及被动模式下在线远程办公影响效果研究述评与展望. 中国人力资源开发, 37(8), 6-21.
[6] 李爱梅, 彭元, 熊冠星. (2015). 孕妇更长计远虑?——怀孕对女性跨期决策偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47(11), 1360-1370.
[7] 李爱梅, 王海侠, 孙海龙, 熊冠星, 杨韶丽. (2018). “长计远虑”的助推效应:怀孕与环境跨期决策. 心理学报, 50(8), 858-867.
[8] 刘洪志, 江程铭, 饶俪琳, 李纾. (2015). “时间折扣”还是“单维占优”?——跨期决策的心理机制. 心理学报, 47(4), 522-532.
[9] 孙红月, 江程铭. (2016). 跨期决策是基于选项还是基于维度? 心理科学进展, 24(3), 431-437.
[10] 王盼盼, 何嘉梅. (2020). 情景预见对跨期决策的影响机制. 心理学报, 52(1), 38-54.
[11] 王笑天, 刘培, 李爱梅. (2019). 自由还是束缚? 异质性视角下工作性通讯工具使用对幸福感的影响. 中国人力资源开发, 36(8), 47-59.
[12] 吴小菊, 陈俊芳, 符佳慧, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2020). 健康领域的跨期决策与健康行为. 心理科学进展, 28(11), 1926-1938.
[13] 徐岚, 陈全, 崔楠, 陆凯丽. (2019). 享受当下, 还是留待未来?——时间观对跨期决策的影响. 心理学报, 51(1), 96-105.
[14] Acerbi A. (2019). Cognitive attraction and online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0224-y
doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0199-0URL
[15] Addis D. R., Wong A. T., & Schacter D. L. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia, 45(7), 1363-1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016URL
[16] Amasino D. R., Sullivan N. J., Kranton R. E., & Huettel S. A. (2019). Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(4), 383-392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2URLpmid: 30971787
[17] Anderson B. A., Laurent P. A., & Yantis S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(25), 10367-10371. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104047108
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108URLpmid: 21646524
[18] Baird B., Smallwood J., & Schooler J. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1604-1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.007URL
[19] Baumeister R. F., Vohs K. D., & Oettingen G. (2016). Pragmatic prospection: How and why people think about the future. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000060
doi: 10.1037/gpr0000060URL
[20] Benner M. J., & Tushman M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096
doi: 10.5465/amr.2003.9416096URL
[21] Benoit R. G., Gilbert S. J., & Burgess P. W. (2011). A neural mechanism mediating the impact of episodic prospection on farsighted decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(18), 6771-6779. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6559-10.2011
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6559-10.2011URL
[22] Berger S., Wyss A. M., & Knoch D. (2018). Low self-control capacity is associated with immediate responses to smartphone signals. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.031
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.031URL
[23] Berntsen D. (2019). Spontaneous future cognitions: An integrative review. Psychological Research, 83(4), 651-665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1127-z
doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1127-zURLpmid: 30535833
[24] Birnholtz J., Davison J., & Li A. (2017). Attending to attention: How do people attract, manage, and negotiate attention using mobile devices? Mobile Media & Communication, 5(3), 256-274.
[25] Blain B., Hollard G., & Pessiglione M. (2016). Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of daylong cognitive work on economic decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(25), 6967-6972. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520527113
[26] Boyer P. (2008). Evolutionary economics of mental time travel? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.003
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.03.003URL
[27] Bromberg U., Lobatcheva M., & Peters J. (2017). Episodic future thinking reduces temporal discounting in healthy adolescents. PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0188079. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188079
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188079URL
[28] Bromberg U., Wiehler A., & Peters J. (2015). Episodic future thinking is related to impulsive decision making in healthy adolescents. Child Development, 86(5), 1458-1468. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12390
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12390URLpmid: 26110500
[29] Bromberg-Martin E. S., & Monosov I. E. (2020). Neural circuitry of information seeking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.006URLpmid: 33681428
[30] Brown R., Duck J., & Jimmieson N. (2014). E-mail in the workplace: The role of stress appraisals and normative response pressure in the relationship between E-mail stressors and employee strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 21(4), 325-347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037464
doi: 10.1037/a0037464URL
[31] Bulley A., Henry J., & Suddendorf T. (2016). Prospection and the present moment: The role of episodic foresight in intertemporal choices between immediate and delayed rewards. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000061
doi: 10.1037/gpr0000061URL
[32] Bulley A., & Irish M. (2018). The functions of prospection - variations in health and disease. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2328. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02328
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02328URLpmid: 30538655
[33] Bulley A., & Schacter D. L. (2020). Deliberating trade-offs with the future. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0834-9
doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0834-9URLpmid: 32184495
[34] Busemeyer J. R., Gluth S., Rieskamp J., & Turner B. M. (2019). Cognitive and neural bases of multi-attribute, multi- alternative, value-based decisions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 251-263. https://doi.org/S1364661318302845
doi: S1364-6613(18)30284-5URLpmid: 30630672
[35] Cannon C., Goldsmith K., & Roux C. (2019). A self-regulatory model of resource scarcity. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(1), 104-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1035
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.2019.29.issue-1URL
[36] Carlsson F., Gravert C. A., Kurz V., & Johansson-Stenman O. (2020). Nudging as an environmental policy instrument. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3711946
[37] Chang B. P. I., Claassen M. A., & Klein O. (2020). The time is ripe: Thinking about the future reduces unhealthy eating in those with a higher BMI. Foods, 9(10), 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101391
doi: 10.3390/foods9101391URL
[38] Chernev A., Böckenholt U., & Goodman J. (2015). Choice overload: A conceptual review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(2), 333-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002URL
[39] Ciaramelli E., Sellitto M., Tosarellic G., & di Pellegrino G. (2019). Imagining events alternative to the present can attenuate delay discounting. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00269
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00269URLpmid: 31920579
[40] Cole S. N., & Berntsen D. (2016). Do future thoughts reflect personal goals? Current concerns and mental time travel into the past and future. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1044542
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1044542URL
[41] D’Argembeau A., Stawarczyk D., Majerus S., Collette F., van der Linden M., Feyers D., … Salmon E. (2010). The neural basis of personal goal processing when envisioning future events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1701-1713. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21314
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21314URL
[42] Dayan E., & Bar-Hillel M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity II: Menu positions influence food orders. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(4), 333-342.
[43] Demarque C., Charalambides L., Hilton D. J., & Waroquier L. (2015). Nudging sustainable consumption: The use of descriptive norms to promote a minority behavior in a realistic online shopping environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 166-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.008
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.008URL
[44] Eppler M. J. (2015). Information quality and information overload: The promises and perils of the information age. Communication and Technology, 5, 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110271355-013
[45] Forstmann B. U., Ratcliff R., & Wagenmakers E. -J. (2016). Sequential sampling models in cognitive neuroscience: Advantages, applications, and extensions. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 641-666. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645
[46] Franco-Watkins A. M., Mattson R. E., & Jackson M. D. (2016). Now or later? Attentional processing and intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(2-3), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1895
doi: 10.1002/bdm.v29.1URL
[47] Frederick S., Loewenstein G., & O’Donoghue T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2), 351-401. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161311
doi: 10.1257/jel.40.2.351URL
[48] Friis R., Skov L. R., Olsen A., Appleton K. M., Saulais L., Dinnella C., … Perez-Cueto F. J. A. (2017). Comparison of three nudge interventions (priming, default option, and perceived variety) to promote vegetable consumption in a self-service buffet setting. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0176028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176028
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176028URL
[49] Garcia F., Guidice R. M., & Mero N. P. (2019). The interactive effect of person and situation on explorative and exploitative behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.50
[50] Glickman M., Tsetsos K., & Usher M. (2018). Attentional selection mediates framing and risk-bias effects. Psychological Science, 29(12), 2010-2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618803643
doi: 10.1177/0956797618803643URLpmid: 30403368
[51] Gluth S., Spektor M. S., & Rieskamp J. (2018). Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making. ELife, 7, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39659
[52] Greene K. N., Gabrielyan G., Just D. R., & Wansink B. (2017). Fruit-promoting smarter lunchrooms interventions: Results from a cluster RCT. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(4), 451-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.015
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.015URL
[53] Gustafson C. R., & Zeballos E. (2020). The effect of presenting relative calorie information on calories ordered. Appetite, 153, 104727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104727
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104727URL
[54] Hallowell E. M. (2005). Overloaded circuits: Why smart people underperform. Harvard Business Review, 83(1), 54-62.
pmid: 15697113
[55] Hanks T. D., & Summerfield C. (2017). Perceptual decision making in rodents, monkeys, and humans. Neuron, 93(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.003URL
[56] Hardisty D. J., & Pfeffer J. (2017). Intertemporal uncertainty avoidance: When the future is uncertain, people prefer the present, and when the present is uncertain, people prefer the future. Management Science, 63(2), 519-527. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2349URL
[57] Hardisty D. J., & Weber E. U. (2020). Impatience and savoring vs. dread: Asymmetries in anticipation explain consumer time preferences for positive vs. negative events. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 598-613. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1169
doi: 10.1002/jcpy.v30.4URL
[58] Jansen J. J. P., van den Bosch F. A. J., & Volberda H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576URL
[59] Kahneman D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[60] Kahneman D., & Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
doi: 10.2307/1914185URL
[61] Kaufmann C., Müller T., Hefti A., & Boes S. (2018). Does personalized information improve health plan choices when individuals are distracted? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 149, 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.013
doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.03.013URL
[62] Kim A., Bansal P., & Haugh H. (2019). No time like the present: How a present time perspective can foster sustainable development. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 607-634. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1295
doi: 10.5465/amj.2015.1295URL
[63] Kleinknecht R., Haq H. U., Muller A. R., & Kraan K. O. (2020). An attention-based view of short-termism: The effects of organizational structure. European Management Journal, 38(2), 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.09.002
doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.09.002URL
[64] Kogut T., Eyal T., & Sharon I. (2017). Seeing into the future: Future time orientation as a moderator of temporal distance effects on educators’ decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(4), 889-898. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2015
doi: 10.1002/bdm.v30.4URL
[65] Krajbich I. (2019). Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.008
doi: S2352-250X(18)30186-6URLpmid: 30368108
[66] Krajbich I., Armel C., & Rangel A. (2010). Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13(10), 1292-1298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2635
doi: 10.1038/nn.2635URLpmid: 20835253
[67] Kroese F. M., Marchiori D. R., & de Ridder D. T. D.. (2016). Nudging healthy food choices: A field experiment at the train station. Journal of Public Health, 38(2), e133-e137. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdv096
[68] Kvavilashvili L., & Ellis J. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp.23-51). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
[69] Laran J. (2020). Self-control: Information, priorities, and resources. Consumer Psychology Review, 3(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1058
doi: 10.1002/arcp.v3.1URL
[70] Lejarraga T., Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Pachur T., & Hertwig R. (2019). The attention-aversion gap: How allocation of attention relates to loss aversion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 40(5), 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.008
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.008URL
[71] Leroy S. (2009). Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002URL
[72] Leroy S., & Glomb T. M. (2018). Tasks interrupted: How anticipating time pressure on resumption of an interrupted task causes attention residue and low performance on interrupting tasks and how a “ready-to-resume” plan mitigates the effects. Organization Science, 29(3), 380-397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1184
doi: 10.1287/orsc.2017.1184URL
[73] Leung B. T. K. (2020). Limited cognitive ability and selective information processing. Games and Economic Behavior, 120, 345-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2020.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.geb.2020.01.005URL
[74] Li S., Li J.-L., Yang S.-W., Wu X.-J., Chen J.-F., Ding Y., … Zheng R. (2020). The psychological typhoon eye effect in responses to terrorism. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 14, e21. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2020.13
doi: 10.1017/prp.2020.13URL
[75] Lin H., Saunders B., Friese M., Evans N. J., & Inzlicht M. (2020). Strong effort manipulations reduce response caution: A preregistered reinvention of the ego-depletion paradigm. Psychological Science, 31(5), 531-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904990
doi: 10.1177/0956797620904990URL
[76] Mann T., & Ward A. (2007). Attention, self-control, and health behaviors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 280-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00520.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00520.xURL
[77] Mellis A. M., Snider S. E., Deshpande H. U., LaConte S. M., & Bickel W. K. (2019). Practicing prospection promotes patience: Repeated episodic future thinking cumulatively reduces delay discounting. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 204, 107507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.010
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.010URL
[78] Miloyan B., & McFarlane K. A. (2019). The measurement of episodic foresight: A systematic review of assessment instruments. Cortex, 117, 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.018
doi: S0010-9452(18)30270-3URLpmid: 30274668
[79] Miyake A., Friedman N. P., Emerson M. J., Witzki A. H., Howerter A., & Wager T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
URLpmid: 10945922
[80] Moen F., & Olsen M. (2020). Grit: A unique protective factor of coaches well-being and burnout? New Ideas in Psychology, 59, 100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100794
doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2020.100794URL
[81] Mrkva K., Cole J. C., & van Boven L..(2021). Attention increases environmental risk perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000772
doi: 10.1037/xge0000772URL
[82] Mrkva K., Ramos J., & van Boven L. (2020). Attention influences emotion, judgment, and decision making to explain mental simulation. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7( 4), 404-422. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000221
[83] Mrkva K., Travers M., & van Boven L. (2018). Simulational fluency reduces feelings of psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(3), 354-376. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000408
doi: 10.1037/xge0000408URL
[84] Muraven M., Shmueli D., & Burkley E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 524-537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.524
URLpmid: 16938035
[85] Neal A., Ballard T., & Vancouver J. B. (2017). Dynamic self-regulation and multiple-goal pursuit. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 401-423.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113156URL
[86] Neroni M. A., Gamboz N., de Vito S., & Brandimonte M. A.(2016). Effects of self-generated versus experimenter- provided cues on the representation of future events. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(9), 1799-1811. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1100205
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1100205URL
[87] O’Donnell S., Daniel T. O., & Epstein L. H. (2017). Does goal relevant episodic future thinking amplify the effect on delay discounting? Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.014
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.014URL
[88] Ophir E., Nass C., & Wagner A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583-15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903620106URL
[89] Parr T., & Friston K. J. (2019). Attention or salience? Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.006
doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.006URL
[90] Persson P. (2018). Attention manipulation and information overload. Behavioural Public Policy, 2(1), 78-106.
doi: 10.1017/bpp.2017.10URL
[91] Peters J., & Büchel C. (2010). Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of Prefrontal-Mediotemporal interactions. Neuron, 66(1), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.026
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.026URLpmid: 20399735
[92] Petry N. M., Bickel W. K., & Arnett M. (1998). Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. Addiction, 93(5), 729-738. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9357298.
URLpmid: 9692271
[93] Policastro P., Smith Z., & Chapman G. (2017). Put the healthy item first: Order of ingredient listing influences consumer selection. Journal of Health Psychology, 22(7), 853-863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315617328
doi: 10.1177/1359105315617328URLpmid: 26672109
[94] Prabhakar J., Coughlin C., & Ghetti S. (2016). The neurocognitive development of episodic prospection and its implications for academic achievement. Mind, Brain, and Education, 10(3), 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12124
doi: 10.1111/mbe.2016.10.issue-3URL
[95] Radu P. T., Yi R., Bickel W. K., Gross J. J., & McClure S. M. (2011). A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96(3), 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2011.96-363
doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-363URL
[96] Read D., Olivola C. Y., & Hardisty D. J. (2017). The value of nothing: Asymmetric attention to opportunity costs drives intertemporal decision making. Management Science, 63(12), 4277-4297. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2547
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2547URL
[97] Reeck C., Wall D., & Johnson E. J. (2017). Search predicts and changes patience in intertemporal choice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(45), 11890-11895. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707040114
[98] Reutskaja E., Lindner A., Nagel R., Andersen R. A., & Camerer C. F. (2018). Choice overload reduces neural signatures of choice set value in dorsal striatum and anterior cingulate cortex. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(12), 925-935. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0440-2
doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0440-2URLpmid: 30988434
[99] Roetzel P. G. (2019). Information overload in the information age: A review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development. Business Research, 12(2), 479-522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0069-z
[100] Rosen C. C., Simon L. S., Gajendran R. S., Johnson R. E., Lee H. W., & Lin S. H. (2019). Boxed in by your inbox: Implications of daily E-mail demands for managers’ leadership behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000343
doi: 10.1037/apl0000343URL
[101] Rung J. M., & Madden G. J. (2018). Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(9), 1349-1381. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000462
doi: 10.1037/xge0000462URL
[102] Saxena D., & Lamest M. (2018). Information overload and coping strategies in the big data context: Evidence from the hospitality sector. Journal of Information Science, 44(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551517693712
doi: 10.1177/0165551517693712URL
[103] Schacter D. L. (2012). Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist, 67(8), 603-613. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029869
doi: 10.1037/a0029701URL
[104] Schacter D. L., Addis D. R., & Buckner R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events:Concepts, data, and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.001
[105] Sciandra M. R., Inman J. J., & Stephen A. T. (2019). Smart phones, bad calls? The influence of consumer mobile phone use, distraction, and phone dependence on adherence to shopping plans. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(4), 574-594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00647-9
doi: 10.1007/s11747-019-00647-9URL
[106] Servidio R. (2019). Self-control and problematic smartphone use among Italian University students: The mediating role of the fear of missing out and of smartphone use patterns. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00373-z
[107] Shadlen M. N. N., & Shohamy D. (2016). Decision making and sequential sampling from memory. Neuron, 90(5), 927-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.036
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.036URL
[108] Shen S. C., Huang Y. N., Jiang C. M., & Li S. (2019). Can asymmetric subjective opportunity cost effect explain impatience in intertemporal choice? A replication study. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(2), 214-222. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RY45B
[109] Shevorykin A., Pittman J. C., Bickel W. K., O’connor R. J., Malhotra R., Prashad N., & Sheffer C. E. (2019). Primed for health: Future thinking priming decreases delay discounting. Health Behavior and Policy Review, 6(4), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.14485/HBPR.6.4.5
doi: 10.14485/hbpr.6.4.5URLpmid: 32671129
[110] Simon H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information-rich world. Computers, Communication, and the Public Interest., 70, 37-72.
[111] Sjåstad H., & Baumeister R. F. (2018). The future and the will: Planning requires self-control, and ego depletion leads to planning aversion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.01.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.01.005URL
[112] Smith S. M., & Krajbich I. (2019). Gaze amplifies value in decision making. Psychological Science, 30(1), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618810521
doi: 10.1177/0956797618810521URL
[113] Stothart C., Mitchum A., & Yehnert C. (2015). The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 893-897. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000100
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000100URL
[114] Sun H. L., Li A. M., Shen S. C., Xiong G. X., Rao L. L., Zheng R., … Li S. (2020). Early departure, early revival: A “free from care” account of negative temporal discounting. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 16(2), 103-116. https://doi.org/10.5709/ACP-0289-0
doi: 10.5709/acp-0289-0URL
[115] Szpunar K. K., Spreng R. N., & Schacter D. L. (2014). A taxonomy of prospection: Introducing an organizational framework for future-oriented cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(52), 18414-18421. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1417144111
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417144111URLpmid: 25416592
[116] Szpunar K. K., Watson J. M., & McDermott K. B. (2007). Neural substrates of envisioning the future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(2), 642-647. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610082104
URLpmid: 17202254
[117] Thorstad R., & Wolff P. (2018). A big data analysis of the relationship between future thinking and decision-making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(8), E1740-E1748.
[118] Verschooren S., Schindler S., de Raedt R., & Pourtois G.(2019). Switching attention from internal to external information processing: A review of the literature and empirical support of the resource sharing account. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(2), 468-490. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01568-y
doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01568-yURLpmid: 30719626
[119] Voinea C., Vică C., Mihailov E., & Savulescu J. (2020). The internet as cognitive enhancement. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2345-2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00210-8
doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00210-8URL
[120] Ward A. F., Duke K., Gneezy A., & Bos M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462
doi: 10.1086/691462URL
[121] Whelan E., Islam A. K. M. N., & Brooks S. (2020). Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance. Computers and Education, 143, 103692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692
doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692URL
[122] Wilson A. L., Buckley E., Buckley J. D., & Bogomolova S. (2016). Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming. Evidence from a systematic review. Food Quality and Preference, 51, 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.009
doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.009URL
[123] Zheng Y., Shen S., Xu M., Rao L., & Li S. (2019). Worth- based choice: Giving an offered smaller pear an even greater fictional value. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 13, E10. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.4
doi: 10.1017/prp.2019.4URL




[1]黄元娜, 李云箫, 李纾. 为什么被选的和被拒的会是同一个备择选项?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1010-1021.
[2]陈彦垒, 胡志坚. 傅斯年的心理学探索及其贡献[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1131-1140.
[3]杨玲, 刘文鑫, 张炀, 张建勋, 牛禄霖. 物质成瘾领域延迟折扣研究中的外部效度问题[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 140-149.
[4]李佳洁, 于彤彤. 基于助推的健康饮食行为干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2052-2063.
[5]吴小菊, 陈俊芳, 符佳慧, 李纾, 梁竹苑. 健康领域的跨期决策与健康行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1926-1938.
[6]徐富明, 黄龙, 张慧. 随机控制实验:助推脱贫的现场干预研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1953-1960.
[7]陈圣栋, 陈永强, 高伟, 罗利, 杨洁敏, 袁加锦. 认知加工的自动化现象:从二分法到渐进观[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563.
[8]蒋元萍, 孙红月. 情绪对跨期决策的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1622-1630.
[9]赵晓颖, 李爱梅, 王海侠. 助推目标实现:时间标记的动力效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1275-1293.
[10]谢铠杰, 马家涛, 何铨, 江程铭. 描述性规范提升义务献血的意愿而非行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 1019-1024.
[11]刘永芳, 范雯健, 侯日霞. 从理论到研究, 再到应用:塞勒及其贡献[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 381-393.
[12]刘培, 冯一丹, 李爱梅, 刘伟, 谢健飞. 揭秘经济管理中的行为异象:心理账户理论的应用启示[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 406-417.
[13]刘欢, 隋晓阳, 黄元娜, 林榕平, 许明星. 行为经济学在养老储蓄领域的助推应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 418-428.
[14]张书维, 梁歆佚, 岳经纶. 行为社会政策:“助推”公共福利的实践与探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 429-438.
[15]傅鑫媛, 辛自强, 楼紫茜, 高琰. 基于助推的环保行为干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(11): 1939-1950.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5564
相关话题/心理 科学 信息 资源 健康