删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

虚拟健康社区医生贡献行为的形成机制

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

彭家敏1(), 谢礼珊2, 关新华3
1广东工业大学管理学院, 广州 510520
2中山大学管理学院, 广州 510275
3广东财经大学地理与旅游学院, 广州 510320
收稿日期:2020-10-27出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25
通讯作者:彭家敏E-mail:jmctu@163.com

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71972054);国家自然科学基金项目(71772186);国家自然科学基金项目(71802052);广东省自然科学基金项目(2019A1515011 494);广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD17YGL05)

Formation mechanism of the doctor contribution behavior in virtual health communities

PENG Jiamin1(), XIE Lishan2, GUAN Xinhua3
1School of management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
2School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
3Geography and Tourism School, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China
Received:2020-10-27Online:2021-06-15Published:2021-04-25
Contact:PENG Jiamin E-mail:jmctu@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 虚拟健康社区医生贡献行为(Doctor Contribution Behavior in Virtual Health Communities, V-DCB)在社会福祉创造中发挥着重要作用。从价值共创理论视角, 结合群体卷入模型和积极心理学研究, 提出在线服务交往中医生贡献行为前因后果的理论模型。首先从资源投入视角对V-DCB的概念和内涵进行分析, 并探讨测量工具的维度。接着分析社会交换和社会认同双重动机下的V-DCB行为卷入过程, 以及服务生态系统资源补充的激励作用。最后探讨V-DCB对医患双方幸福感共创的影响, 以及资源匹配因素对行为者幸福感产生的调节效应。



图1研究2概念模型
图1研究2概念模型



图2研究3概念模型
图2研究3概念模型



图3理论框架
图3理论框架







[1] 简兆权, 令狐克睿, 李雷. (2016). 价值共创研究的演进与展望——从"顾客体验"到"服务生态系统"视角. 外国经济与管理, 38(9), 3-20.
[2] 孙悦, 张向先, 韩晓宏. (2018). 在线医疗社区知识贡献行为的关键影响因素识别与分析. 图书情报工作, 62(11), 43-52.
[3] 田晓明, 段锦云, 傅强. (2010). 群体卷入模型: 理论背景、内容介绍与未来展望. 心理科学进展, 18(10), 1628-1635.
[4] 赵晶. (2014). 在线健康社区中成员价值共创行为. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社.
[5] 周军杰. (2016). 用户在线参与的行为类型——基于在线健康社区的质性分析. 管理案例研究与评论, 9(2), 173-184.
[6] Black, H. G., & Gallan, A. S. (2015). Transformative service networks: Cocreated value as well-being. Service Industries Journal, 35(15-16),826-845.
[7] Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice. Human Resource Management Review, 13(1), 107-126.
[8] Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
[9] Busser, J. A., & Shulga, L. V. (2018). Co-created value: Multidimensional scale and nomological network. Tourism Management, 65, 69-86.
doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.09.014URL
[10] Chen, T., Drennan, J., Andrews, L., & Hollebeek, L. D. (2018). User experience sharing: Understanding customer initiation of value co-creation in online communities. European Journal of Marketing, 52(5-6),1154-1184.
[11] Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001URL
[12] Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276URL
[13] Echeverri, P., & Sk?lén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351-373.
doi: 10.1177/1470593111408181URL
[14] Farquhar, J. D., & Robson, J. (2017). Selective demarketing: When customers destroy value. Marketing Theory, 17(2), 165-182.
doi: 10.1177/1470593116679872URL
[15] Finsterwalder, J., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2020). Intentionality and transformative services: Wellbeing co-creation and spill-over effects. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101922
doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101922URL
[16] Gruen, T. W., Summers, J. O., & Acito, F. (2000). Relationship marketing activities, commitment, and membership behaviors in professional associations. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 34-49.
doi: 10.1509/jmkg.64.3.34.18030URL
[17] Gutek, B. A., Cherry, B., Bhappu A. D., Schneider, S., & Woolf, L. (2000). Features of service relationships and encounters. Work & Occupations, 27(3), 319-352.
[18] Guo, S., Guo, X., Zhang, X., & Vogel, D. (2018). Doctor-patient relationship strength's impact in an online healthcare community. Information Technology for Development, 24(2), 279-300.
doi: 10.1080/02681102.2017.1283287URL
[19] Guo, X., Guo, S., Vogel, D., & Li, Y. (2016). Online healthcare community interaction dynamics. Journal of Management Science, 1(1), 58-74.
[20] Gwinner, K. P., Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., & Kumar, A. (2005). Service customization through employee adaptiveness. Journal of Service Research, 8(2), 131-148.
doi: 10.1177/1094670505279699URL
[21] Heiman, B. A., & Nickerson, J.A (2004). Empirical evidence regarding the tension between knowledge sharing and knowledge expropriation in collaborations. Managerial and Decision Economics, 25(6-7),401-420.
[22] Ho, H., & Ganesan, S. (2013). Does knowledge base compatibility help or hurt knowledge sharing between suppliers in coopetition? The role of customer participation. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 91-107.
doi: 10.1509/jm.11.0570URL
[23] Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307-324.
doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307URL
[24] Homburg, C., Müller, M., & Klarmann, M. (2011). When does salespeople's customer orientation lead to customer loyalty? The differential effects of relational and functional customer orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(6), 795-812.
doi: 10.1007/s11747-010-0220-7URL
[25] Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.
doi: 10.2307/2787065URL
[26] Laud, G., & Karpen, I. O. (2017). Value co-creation behaviour: Role of embeddedness and outcome considerations. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(4), 778-807.
doi: 10.1108/JSTP-04-2016-0069URL
[27] Lin, T. C., Lai, M. C., & Yang, S. W. (2016). Factors influencing physicians' knowledge sharing on web medical forums. Health Informatics Journal, 22(3), 594-607.
doi: 10.1177/1460458215576229URL
[28] Mahr, D., & Lievens, A. (2012). Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation. Research Policy, 41(1), 167-177.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.006URL
[29] Mccoll-Kennedy, J. R., Hogan, S. J., Witell, L., & Snyder, H. (2017). Cocreative customer practices: Effects of health care customer value cocreation practices on well-being. Journal of Business Research, 70, 55-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.07.006URL
[30] Mccoll-Kennedy, J. R., Vargo, S. L., Dagger, T. S., Sweeney, J. C., & van Kasteren, Y. (2012). Health care customer value cocreation practice styles. Journal of Service Research, 15(4), 370-389.
doi: 10.1177/1094670512442806URL
[31] Neghina, C., Bloemer, J., van Birgelen, M., & Cani?ls, M. C. J. (2017). Consumer motives and willingness to co-create in professional and generic services. Journal of Service Management, 28(1), 157-181.
doi: 10.1108/JOSM-12-2015-0404URL
[32] Osei-Frimpong, K., Wilson, A., & Lemke, F. (2018). Patient co-creation activities in healthcare service delivery at the micro level: The influence of online access to healthcare information. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, 14-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.009URL
[33] Plé, L. (2016). Studying customers' resource integration by service employees in interactional value co-creation. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(2), 152-164.
doi: 10.1108/JSM-02-2015-0065URL
[34] Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
[35] Sheldon, K. M., & King, L. (2001). Why positive psychology is necessary. American Psychologist, 56(3), 216-217.
pmid: 11315247
[36] Silpakit, P., & Fisk, R. (1985). “Participatizing” the service encounter: A Theoretical Framework. In T. M. Bloch, G.D. Upah, & V. A. Zeichaml (Eds.), Services marketing in a changing environment (pp.117-121). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
[37] Smith, A. M. (2013). The value co-destruction process: A customer resource perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11), 1889-1909.
doi: 10.1108/EJM-08-2011-0420URL
[38] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks.
[39] Tsai, H.-T., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2014). Contribution behavior in virtual communities: cognitive, emotional, and social influences. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 38(1), 143-163.
doi: 10.25300/MISQURL
[40] Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349-361.
pmid: 14633471
[41] Vafeas, M., Hughes, T., & Hilton, T. (2016). Antecedents to value diminution: A dyadic perspective. Marketing Theory, 16(4), 469-491.
doi: 10.1177/1470593116652005URL
[42] Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
doi: 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6URL
[43] Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2010). From repeat patronage to value co-creation in service ecosystems: A transcending conceptualization of relationship. Journal of Business Market Management, 4(4), 169-179.
doi: 10.1007/s12087-010-0046-0URL
[44] Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It's all B2B...and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181-187.
doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.026URL
[45] Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.
doi: 10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3URL
[46] Yan, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management, 53(5), 643-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.im.2016.02.001URL
[47] Yang, H., Du, H. S., He, W., & Qiao, H. (2019). Understanding the motivators affecting doctors' contributions in online healthcare communities: Professional status as a moderator. Behaviour & Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1679887
[48] Yi, Y., & Gong, T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1279-1284.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.026URL
[49] Zhang, X., Guo, X., Lai, K.-H., & Yi, W. (2019). How does online interactional unfairness matter for patient-doctor relationship quality in online health consultation? The contingencies of professional seniority and disease severity. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(3), 336-354.
doi: 10.1080/0960085X.2018.1547354URL
[50] Zhang, X., Liu, S., Deng, Z., & Chen, X. (2017). Knowledge sharing motivations in online health communities: A comparative study of health professionals and normal users. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 797-810.
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.028URL
[51] Zhao, J., Abrahamson, K., Anderson, J. G., Ha, S., & Widdows, R. (2013). Trust, empathy, social identity, and contribution of knowledge within patient online communities. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(10), 1041-1048.
[52] Zhao, J., Wang, T., & Fan, X. (2015). Patient value co-creation in online health communities. Journal of Service Management, 26(1), 72-96.
doi: 10.1108/JOSM-12-2013-0344URL




[1]崔馨月, 李斌, 贺汝婉, 张淑颖, 雷励. 亲社会支出对主观幸福感的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1279-1290.
[2]陈浩彬, 汪凤炎. 老年人的智慧[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 885-893.
[3]孙俊芳, 辛自强, 包呼格吉乐图, 刘敏, 岳衡. 幸福感的稳态与跃迁:一个新的整合视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 481-491.
[4]叶静, 张戌凡. 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 202-217.
[5]杜健. 自我概念一致性与幸福感间的关系:文化的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1751-1761.
[6]张戌凡, 席猛. 工会实践对员工工作幸福感的影响:基于工具-情感的双路径视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1354-1362.
[7]龚艳萍, 陈卓, 谢菊兰, 谢笑春. 手机冷落行为的前因、后果与作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1258-1267.
[8]傅绪荣, 魏新东, 王予灵, 汪凤炎. 智慧与幸福感的关系:基于多元幸福取向的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 544-556.
[9]余樱, 景奉杰, 杨艳. 怎样花钱更幸福?购买类型对幸福感的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2133-2140.
[10]丁凤琴, 赵虎英. 感恩的个体主观幸福感更强?—— 一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(10): 1749-1763.
[11]晏小华, 刘振亮, 王祥坤, 沐守宽. 幸福悖论及其最新解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(1): 180-189.
[12]杨盈, 耿柳娜, 相鹏, 张晶, 朱丽芳. 自然关联性:概念、测量、功能及干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1360-1374.
[13]徐富明, 张慧, 马红宇, 邓颖, 史燕伟, 李欧. 贫困问题:基于心理学的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1431-1440.
[14]杨小莉;刘潇肖;白宝玉. 身高的心理效应及其内在机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 857-865.
[15]徐晓波;孙超;汪凤炎. 精神幸福感:概念、测量、相关变量及干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(2): 275-289.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5456
相关话题/心理 科学 社会 社区 广州

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 面孔社会知觉中的表情效应
    李雅宁1,2,田杨阳1,吴琦1,冷海州1,蒋重清1(),杨伊生21辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连1160292内蒙古师范大学心理学院,呼和浩特010022收稿日期:2020-04-11出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:蒋重清E-mail:jzqcjj@hotmail. ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 成熟对青春期型反社会行为的影响
    林爽,刘文(),王薇薇,张雪辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连116029收稿日期:2020-07-06出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:刘文E-mail:wenliu703@126.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目“留守儿童社会适应促进与反社会预防研究”(19Z ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人们如何设想未来:未来情景思维对个体心理和行为的影响
    卢蕾安,王春生,任俊()浙江师范大学教育与人类发展学院心理系,金华321004收稿日期:2020-07-09出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:任俊E-mail:drinren@163.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划教育学一般课题“基于积极心理学理念 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 姓名对个体心理与行为的实际影响:证据和理论
    包寒吴霜,蔡华俭()中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京100101中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2020-09-02出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:蔡华俭E-mail:caihj@psych.ac.cn基金资助:国家社会科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 傅斯年的心理学探索及其贡献
    陈彦垒(),胡志坚聊城大学教育科学学院,山东聊城252059收稿日期:2020-08-13出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:陈彦垒E-mail:chenyanlei@lcu.edu.cn基金资助:聊城市社科规划专项(ZXYB202002019)FuSsu-nien ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 空间交互研究新视角:多重社会因素的影响
    肖承丽(),隋雨檠,肖苏衡,周仁来()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-07-03出版日期:2021-05-15发布日期:2021-03-30通讯作者:肖承丽,周仁来E-mail:xiaocl@nju.edu.cn;rlzhou@nju.edu.cn基金资助:江苏高校哲学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于社交媒体数据的心理指标识别建模: 机器学习的方法
    苏悦1,2,刘明明1,3,赵楠1,刘晓倩1,朱廷劭1,2()1中国科学院心理研究所,北京1001012中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000493联想研究院,北京100094收稿日期:2020-01-14出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22基金资助:国家社科基金重点项目(17A ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人际互动中社会学习的计算神经机制
    黎穗卿,陈新玲,翟瑜竹,张怡洁,章植鑫,封春亮()教育部脑认知与教育科学重点实验室(华南师范大学);华南师范大学心理学院;华南师范大学心理应用研究中心;华南师范大学广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室,广州510631收稿日期:2020-08-10出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于游戏的心理测评
    徐俊怡,李中权()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-05-24出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李中权E-mail:zqli@nju.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社科规划基金项目(20YJA190004);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 社会互动加工的认知特性及脑机制——第三人称的视角
    程羽慧,袁祥勇(),蒋毅中国科学院心理研究所,脑与认知科学国家重点实验室,脑科学与智能技术卓越创新中心,北京100101;中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049;北京脑科学与类脑研究中心,北京102206收稿日期:2020-05-14出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01