删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

神经美学视角的审美愉悦加工机制

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

张璇1(), 周晓林2()
1中央美术学院心理健康中心, 北京 100102
2上海外国语大学语言研究院, 上海 201600
收稿日期:2020-11-01出版日期:2021-10-15发布日期:2021-08-23
通讯作者:张璇,周晓林E-mail:zhangxuan@cafa.edu.cn;xz104@pku.edu.cn

基金资助:中央美术学院青年教师科研启动项目(19QNQD158)

The processing mechanism of aesthetic pleasure in the perspective of neuroaesthetics

ZHANG Xuan1(), ZHOU Xiaolin2()
1Mental Health Center, Central Academy of Fine Arts, Beijing 100102, China
2Institute of Linguistics, Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai 201600, China
Received:2020-11-01Online:2021-10-15Published:2021-08-23
Contact:ZHANG Xuan,ZHOU Xiaolin E-mail:zhangxuan@cafa.edu.cn;xz104@pku.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 审美对象特有的刺激属性会唤起观赏者特定的情绪或情感反应。个体在欣赏自然、艺术品和其他人类作品时会产生审美愉悦体验。审美愉悦-兴趣模型(PIA)认为, 审美愉悦体验包含审美过程中自动化加工阶段的审美愉悦和控制加工阶段的审美兴趣。近年来, 神经美学研究表明, 负责愉悦和奖赏的眶额叶皮层在审美过程中广泛激活, 是自动化加工阶段初级审美愉悦奖赏的神经基础, 而审美过程中纹状体亚回路中不同的连接和功能作用与两个阶段中审美愉悦的产生都有关联; 上述结果支持了审美愉悦-兴趣模型。但审美高峰体验时默认模式网络(DMN)相关脑区的激活和负责控制与理性思维的外侧前额叶皮层等脑区的失活, 提示在PIA模型强调的自动化加工阶段审美愉悦和控制加工阶段审美兴趣之上, 还有整合升华阶段的审美沉浸愉悦, PIA模型需得到进一步的扩展。未来研究应进一步检验审美愉悦认知加工模型及神经机制, 探索审美对创造力的影响机制和神经基础, 探讨不同审美经验愉悦机制的异同。



图1审美愉悦PIA理论扩展模型
图1审美愉悦PIA理论扩展模型







[1] 丁峻, 崔宁. (2019). 审美认知的思想辩证法——兼论审美的“第二客体”. 自然辩证法通讯, 41(2), 108-114.
[2] 何先友, 陈雅珏, 杨丹妮, 何德娴. (2019). 流畅性对审美鉴赏的影响——从加工流畅性模型到审美愉悦与兴趣模型. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (3), 71-76.
[3] 李泽厚. (1989). 美学四讲. 北京: 生活•读书•新知三联书店.
[4] 吕坤维. (2019). 中国人的情感——文化心理学阐释 (谢中垚译译). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[5] 契克森米哈赖, M. (1990). 心流(张定琦译). 北京: 中信出版集团.
[6] 滕守尧. (1998). 审美心理描述. 成都: 四川人民出版社.
[7] 叶浩生. (2013). 认知与身体:理论心理学的视角. 心理学报, 45(4), 481-488.
[8] Armstrong, T., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2008). Beauty as an emotion: The exhilarating prospect of mastering a challenging world. Review of General Psychology, 12(4), 305-329.
doi: 10.1037/a0012558URL
[9] Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87-95.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004URL
[10] Beaty, R. E., & Schacter, D. L. (2017). Chapter10-Creativity, self-generated thought, and the brain's default network. The Creative Self, 171-183.
[11] Blood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(20), 11818-11823.
pmid: 11573015
[12] Boccia, M., Barbetti, S., Piccardi, L., Guariglia, C., Ferlazzo, F., Giannini, A. M., & Zaidel, D. W. (2016). Where does brain neural activation in aesthetic responses to visual art occur? Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 60, 65-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.09.009URL
[13] Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, S. B., & Liotti, M. (2011). Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage, 58, 250-258.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012URL
[14] Chao, L., Elvira, B., Basel, A.-J., Pereira, C. S., Thomas, J., & Nandi, A. K. (2017). Effect of explicit evaluation on neural connectivity related to listening to unfamiliar music. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 611.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00611pmid: 29311874
[15] Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics. Annals of the New York Academy of science, 1369(1), 172-194
[16] Coburn, A., Vartanian, O., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Buildings, beauty, and the brain: A neuroscience of architectural experience. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(9), 1521-1531
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01146pmid: 28493809
[17] Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., & Vincent, J. L. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(27), 9673-9678.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102URL
[18] Frijda, N. H., & Sundararajan, L. (2010). Emotion refinement: A theory inspired by Chinese poetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 227-241.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00042.xURL
[19] Galanter, P. (2010). Complexity, neuroaesthetics, and computational aesthetic evaluation. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 13th International Conference on Generative Art, Milan, Italy, 399-409.
[20] García-Prieto, J., Pereda, E., & Maestú, F. (2016) Neurocognitive decoding of aesthetic appreciation. In: Palva S. (Eds) Multimodal oscillation-based connectivity theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32265-0_6
[21] Gerger, G., Leder, H., & Kremer, A. (2014). Context effects on emotional and aesthetic evaluations of artworks and IAPS pictures. Acta Psychologica, 151, 174-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.008URL
[22] Gold, B. P., Pearce, M. T., Mas-Herrero, E., Dagher, A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2019). Predictability and uncertainty in the pleasure of music: A reward for learning? Journal of Neuroscience, 39(47), 9397-9409.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0428-19.2019URL
[23] Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2015). A dual-process perspective on fluency-based aesthetics: The pleasure- interest model of aesthetic liking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 395-410.
doi: 10.1177/1088868315574978URL
[24] Graf, L. K. M., & Landwehr, J. R. (2017). Aesthetic pleasure versus aesthetic interest: The two routes to aesthetic liking. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-15
[25] Hartikainen, K. M., Ogawa, K. H., & Knight, R. T. (2012). Orbitofrontal cortex biases attention to emotional events. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(6), 588-597.
doi: 10.1080/13803395.2012.666231pmid: 22413757
[26] Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2011). Toward a brain-based theory of beauty. Plos One, 6(7), e21852.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021852URL
[27] Ishizu, T., & Zeki, S. (2017). The experience of beauty derived from sorrow. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 4185-4200
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23657URL
[28] Karim, A. K. M. R., & Likova, L. T. (2018). Haptic aesthetics in the blind: A behavioral and fMRI investigation. Electronic Imaging, (14), 1-10.
[29] Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(4), 1699-1705.
pmid: 15010496
[30] Koelsch, S., Vuust, P., & Friston, K. (2019). Predictive processes and the peculiar case of music. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(1), 63-77.
doi: S1364-6613(18)30254-7pmid: 30471869
[31] Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. Plos One, 3(2), 1679.
[32] Lovstad, M., Funderud, I., Lindgren, M., Endestad, T., Due-Tønnessen, P., Meling, T., … Voytek, B. (2012). Contribution of subregions of human frontal cortex to novelty processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(2), 378-95.
doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00099URL
[33] Mantini, D., & Vanduffel, W. (2013). Emerging roles of the brain's default network. Neuroscientist, 19(1), 76-87.
doi: 10.1177/1073858412446202pmid: 22785104
[34] Marianne, T., Elvira, B., Johanna, M., Jan, W., & Suvi, S. (2017). Constituents of music and visual-art related pleasure - a critical integrative literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1218-1229
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01218pmid: 28775697
[35] Mark, R., Peter, V., & Elvira, B. (2018). Brain connectivity networks and the aesthetic experience of music. Brain Sciences, 8(6), 107-120.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci8060107URL
[36] Martindale, C., Moore, K., & Borkum, J. (1990). Aesthetic preference: Anomalous findings for Berlyne's psychobiological theory. American Journal of Psychology, 103(1), 53-80.
doi: 10.2307/1423259URL
[37] Mas-Herrero, E., Karhulahti, M., Marco-Pallares, J., Zatorre, R. J., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2018). The impact of visual art and emotional sounds in specific musical anhedonia. Progress in Brain Research, 237, 399-413.
doi: S0079-6123(18)30017-7pmid: 29779745
[38] Matthew, P., Gernot, G., Yasmine, C., Markey, P. S., & Helmut, L. (2017). But is it really art? The classification of images as "art or not art" and correlation with appraisal and viewer interpersonal differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1729-1749
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01729URL
[39] Matthew, P., Markey, P. S., Lauring, J. O., & Helmut, L. (2016). Visualizing the impact of art: An update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 1-21.
[40] Mauss, I. B., Bunge, S. A., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Automatic emotion regulation. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 146-167.
[41] Mauss, I. B., Cook, C. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Automatic emotion regulation during anger provocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 698-711.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.07.003URL
[42] Mayseless, N., Eran, A., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2015). Generating original ideas: The neural underpinning of originality. Neuroimage, 116, 232-239.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.030pmid: 26003860
[43] McKeown, G. J. (2013). The analogical peacock hypothesis: The sexual selection of mind-reading and relational cognition in human communication. Review of General Psychology, 17(3), 267-287.
doi: 10.1037/a0032631URL
[44] Morawetz, C., Bode, S., Baudewig, J., Jacobs, A. M., & Heekeren, H. R. (2016). Neural representation of emotion regulation goals. Human Brain Mapping, 37(2), 600-620.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23053pmid: 26537018
[45] Mukhopadhyay, D. (2014). Understanding the neuropsychology of aesthetic paradox: The dual phase oscillation hypothesis. Review of General Psychology, 18(3), 237-248.
doi: 10.1037/gpr0000009URL
[46] Muth, C., & Carbon, C.-C. (2013). The aesthetic aha: On the pleasure of having insights into gestalt. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 25-30.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001URL
[47] Nadal, M. (2013). The experience of art: Insights from neuroimaging. Progress in Brain Research, 204, 135-158.
[48] O'Doherty, J. P. (2004). Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: Insights from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(6), 769-776.
pmid: 15582382
[49] Oppenheimer, D. M., & Frank, M. C. (2008). A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: Effects of perceptual fluency on categorization. Cognition, 106(3), 1178-1194.
pmid: 17618616
[50] Packard, S., & Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Studies in Art Education, 16(1), 64.
doi: 10.2307/1320090URL
[51] Pat, W. B. (2017). Eloquent Absence: Aesthetic education in the United States. Journal of Education & Human Development, 6(2), 23-30.
[52] Pauli, B., Elvira, B., & Peter, V. (2017). Global sensory qualities and aesthetic experience in music. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 159. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00159
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00159
[53] Pearce, M. T., Zaidel, D. W., Vartanian, O., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A., & Nadal, M. (2016). Neuroaesthetics: The cognitive neuroscience of aesthetic experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(2), 265-279.
doi: 10.1177/1745691615621274URL
[54] Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.
pmid: 15582859
[55] Salimpoor, V. N., Benovoy, M., Larcher, K., Dagher, A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2011). Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 257-262.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2726pmid: 21217764
[56] Schultz, W., Tremblay, L., & Hollerman, J. R. (2000). Reward processing in primate orbitofrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 272-284.
pmid: 10731222
[57] Stefan, K., Stavros, S., & Gabriele, L. (2018). The auditory cortex hosts network nodes influential for emotion processing: An fMRI study on music-evoked fear and joy. Plos One, 13(1), e0190057.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190057URL
[58] Ticini, L. F. (2017). The role of the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices in aesthetic preference for art. Behavioral Sciences, 7(2), 31-40.
doi: 10.3390/bs7020031URL
[59] Vartanian, O., & Skov, M. (2014). Neural correlates of viewing paintings: Evidence from a quantitative meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Brain and Cognition, 87, 52-56.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.03.004pmid: 24704947
[60] Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Rubin, N. (2012). The brain on art: Intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1-17.
[61] Wald, C. (2015). Neuroscience: The aesthetic brain. Nature, 526, S2-S3
[62] Yacubian, J., Sommer, T., Schroeder, K., Gläscher, J., Braus, D. F., & Büchel, C. (2007). Subregions of the ventral striatum show preferential coding of reward magnitude and probability. Neuroimage, 38(3), 557-563.
pmid: 17889562
[63] Zatorre, R. J. (2015). Musical pleasure and reward:Mechanisms and dysfunction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1337(1), 202-211.
[64] Zhang, W., Zhang, Q. P., & Michael, S. (2015). How do individual-level factors affect the creative solution formation process of teams? Creativity & Innovation Management, 24(3), 508-524.




[1]丛凤娇, 陈宝国. 第二语言学习者形态复杂词的加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 438-439.
[2]李嘉惠, 刘清, 蒋多. 行为决策中诱饵效应的认知加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1688-1696.
[3]曾颖, 夏天生. 音乐的神经美学:从审美反应到神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1596-1606.
[4]戴好运;徐晓东. 违实语义的加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 769-777.
[5]唐江伟;路红;刘毅; 彭坚. 道德直觉决策及其机制探析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1830-1842.
[6]潘孝富;王昭静;高飞;徐莹. 辛苦所得与意外所得的非理性消费偏差:基于IAT检测和ERP证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(4): 596-605.
[7]黄子岚;张卫东. 神经美学:探索审美与大脑的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(5): 672-681.
[8]卢焕华; 王岩; 郭春彦. 从ERP研究看前瞻记忆的神经基础和认知加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(3): 426-431.
[9]王乃弋; 罗跃嘉; 董奇. 审美的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(1): 19-27.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5602
相关话题/心理 科学 神经 美学 北京