删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

东西方文化下的真实自我研究:一种关系的视角

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

梁燕芳, 谢天()
武汉大学哲学学院心理学系, 武汉 430072
收稿日期:2020-04-08出版日期:2021-05-15发布日期:2021-03-30
通讯作者:谢天E-mail:thanksky520@126.com



True self in east and west from Guanxi perspective

LIANG Yanfang, XIE Tian()
Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Received:2020-04-08Online:2021-05-15Published:2021-03-30
Contact:XIE Tian E-mail:thanksky520@126.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 真实自我反映了个体行为与其价值观、信仰、需求等内在状态的一致性程度, 分为特质真实与状态真实。在辨析了真实自我与自我认知、自我概念清晰性、自我一致性、正直、真诚等相关概念的异同, 并梳理该领域已有理论后, 提出真实自我表现或实现的文化差异, 即西方文化中的真实自我是自主动机驱动的, 而东方文化中的真实自我是关系要求驱动的。未来可以将“关系化”作为现象场, 以儒家传统思想为理智资源, 从理论建构、社会现象(新兴网络社交平台、社会变迁), 以及结合具体的研究方法(如跨文化比较、突显情境变化的方法)等方面开展研究。


[1] 费孝通. (1985). 《乡土中国》. 北京: 三联书店.
[2] 侯玉波, 张梦. (2012). 文化“动态建构”的理论和证据. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 38(4),83-89.
[3] 黄光国. (2014). “道”与“君子”:儒家的自我修养论. 华中师范大学学报:人文社会科学版, 53(3),172-182.
[4] 刘庆奇, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 孔繁昌, 连帅磊. (2016). 社交网站真实自我呈现对生活满意度的影响:线上积极反馈和一般自我概念的链式中介作用. 心理科学, 39(2),406-411.
[5] 牛更枫, 鲍娜, 周宗奎, 范翠英, 孔繁昌, 孙晓军. (2015). 社交网站中的自我呈现对生活满意度的影响:积极情绪和社会支持的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(5),563-570.
[6] 彭璐珞, 郑晓莹, 彭泗清. (2017). 文化混搭:研究现状与发展方向. 心理科学进展, 25(7),1240-1250.
[7] 孙倩如, 陈政裕. (2018). 怎样的我才真实?关系对华人真实自我展现的影响. 本土心理学研究, (49),157-206.
[8] 孙瑜. (2020). “虚情与假意”:仪式性互动中的青年本真性. 中国青年研究, (9),76-82.
[9] 谢天, 周珏, 陈咏媛. (2019). 流动性与当代中国社会:一段正在发生的历史 (代卷首语). 中国社会心理学评论, (1),1-13.
[10] 徐欢欢, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 连帅磊. (2017). 社交网站中的真实自我表达与青少年孤独感:自我概念清晰性的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(1),138-141.
[11] 杨宜音. (2008). 关系化还是类别化:中国人“我们”概念形成的社会心理机制探讨. 中国社会科学, (4),149-160.
[12] 杨宜音. (2015). 多元混融的新型自我:全球化时代的自我构念. 中国社会心理学评论, (1),97-116.
[13] 杨中芳, 彭泗清. (1999). 中国人人际信任的概念化:一个人际关系的观点. 社会学研究, 14(2),3-23.
[14] 翟学伟. (2004). 人情、面子与权力的再生产——情理社会中的社会交换方式. 社会学研究, 19(5),50-59.
[15] 翟学伟. (2014). 关系与谋略:中国人的日常计谋. 社会学研究, 29(1),86-103.
[16] 翟学伟. (2017). 爱情与姻缘:两种亲密关系的模式比较——关系向度上的理想型解释. 社会学研究, 32(2),128-149.
[17] 赵志裕, 吴莹, 杨宜音. (2015). 文化混搭:文化与心理研究的新里程(代卷首语). 中国社会心理学评论, (1),1-18.
[18] Alliger, G. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Mitchell, K. E. (1996). The susceptibility of overt and covert integrity tests to coaching and faking. Psychological Science, 7(1),32-39.
[19] Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109(4),619-645.
URLpmid: 12374322
[20] Baker, Z. G., Tou, R. Y., Bryan, J. L., & Knee, C. R. (2017). Authenticity and well-being: Exploring positivity and negativity in interactions as a mediator. Personality and Individual Differences, 113,235-239.
[21] Berdahl, J. L., & Martorana, P. (2006). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(4),497-509.
[22] Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1),83-93.
[23] Brunell, A. B., Kernis, M. H., Goldman, B. M., Heppner, W., Davis, P., Cascio, E. V., & Webster, G. D. (2010). Dispositional authenticity and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8),900-905.
[24] Bureau, J. S., & Mageau, G. A. (2014). Parental autonomy support and honesty: The mediating role of identification with the honesty value and perceived costs and benefits of honesty. Journal of Adolescence, 37(3),225-236.
URLpmid: 24636683
[25] Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1),141-156.
[26] Chen, S. (2019). Authenticity in context: Being true to working selves. Review of General Psychology, 23(1),60-72.
[27] Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84(1),97-110.
URLpmid: 12518973
[28] Christy, A. G., Kim, J., Vess, M., Schlegel, R. J., & Hicks, J. A. (2017). The reciprocal relationship between perceptions of moral goodness and knowledge of others’ true selves. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8),910-917.
[29] Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Ibá?ez-Reyes, J., de Jesús Vargas-Flores, J., Curtis, G. J., Tanaka-Matsumi, J.,…. Simon, J.-Y. R. (2014). Relating self-concept consistency to hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(5),695-712.
[30] Cousins, S. D. (1989). Culture and selfhood in Japan and the US. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1),124-131.
[31] Didonato, T. E., & Krueger, J. I. (2010). Interpersonal affirmation and self-authenticity: A test of Rogers's self-growth hypothesis. Self and Identity, 9(3),322-336.
[32] Drigotas, S. M., Rusbult, C. E., Wieselquist, J., & Whitton, S. W. (1999). Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: Behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(2),293-323.
URLpmid: 10474210
[33] English, T., & Chen, S. (2007). Culture and self-concept stability: Consistency across and within contexts among Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3),478-490.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.478URLpmid: 17723061
[34] English, T., & Chen, S. (2011). Self-concept consistency and culture: The differential impact of two forms of consistency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6),838-849.
[35] Erickson, R. J. (1995). The importance of authenticity for self and society. Symbolic Interaction, 18(2),121-144.
[36] Fischer, R., & Boer, D. (2011). What is more important for national well-being: Money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout, and anxiety across 63 societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1),164-184.
doi: 10.1037/a0023663URL
[37] Fleeson, W. (2001). Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6),1011-1027.
URLpmid: 11414368
[38] Fleeson, W., & Wilt, J. (2010). The relevance of Big Five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement?. Journal of Personality, 78(4),1353-1382.
URLpmid: 20545814
[39] Gan, M., & Chen, S. (2017). Being your actual or ideal self? What it means to feel authentic in a relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(4),465-478.
URLpmid: 28903655
[40] Gan, M., Heller, D., & Chen, S. (2018). The power in being yourself: Feeling authentic enhances the sense of power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(10),1460-1472.
URLpmid: 29739292
[41] James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: H. Holt and Company.
[42] Jongman-Sereno, K. P., & Leary, M. R. (2016). Self-perceived authenticity is contaminated by the valence of one’s behavior. Self and Identity, 15(3),283-301.
[43] Jongman-Sereno, K. P., & Leary, M. R. (2019). The enigma of being yourself: A critical examination of the concept of authenticity. Review of General Psychology, 23(1),133-142.
[44] Jourard, S. M. (1964). The transparent self: Self-disclosure and well-being (No.17). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
[45] Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702),1776-1780.
URLpmid: 15576620
[46] Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1),1-26.
[47] Kernis, M. H., & Goldman, B. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38,283-357.
[48] Kim, J., & Lee, J. E. R. (2011). The Facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of Facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(6),359-364.
[49] Kokkoris, M. D., & Kühnen, U. (2014). “Express the real you”: cultural differences in the perception of self-expression as authenticity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(8),1221-1228.
[50] Kraus, M. W., Chen, S., & Keltner, D. (2011). The power to be me: Power elevates self-concept consistency and authenticity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5),974-980.
[51] Lenton, A. P., Bruder, M., Slabu, L., & Sedikides, C. (2013). How does “being real” feel? The experience of state authenticity. Journal of Personality, 81(3),276-289.
URLpmid: 22812625
[52] Lenton, A. P., Slabu, L., Bruder, M., & Sedikides, C. (2014). Identifying differences in the experience of (in) authenticity: A latent class analysis approach Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 770.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00770URLpmid: 25076932
[53] Lenton, A. P., Slabu, L., & Sedikides, C. (2016). State authenticity in everyday life. European Journal of Personality, 30(1),64-82.
[54] Lynch, M. F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2017). Conditional regard, self-concept, and relational authenticity: Revisiting some key Rogerian concepts cross-culturally, through multilevel modeling. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 60(2),168-186.
[55] Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton, NJ: van Nostrand.
[56] Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Viking Press.
[57] Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[58] Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5),701-717.
[59] Parise, M., Canzi, E., Olivari, M. G., & Ferrari, L. (2019). Self-concept clarity and psychological adjustment in adolescence: The mediating role of emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 138,363-365.
[60] Plasencia, M. L., Taylor, C. T., & Alden, L. E. (2016). Unmasking one’s true self facilitates positive relational outcomes: Authenticity promotes social approach processes in social anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(6),1002-1014.
[61] Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science: Vol. 3: Formulations of the person and the social context (pp.184-256). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[62] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1),54-67.
doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020URLpmid: 10620381
[63] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L.(2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press.
[64] Ryan, W. S., Legate, N., & Weinstein, N. (2015). Coming out as lesbian, gay, or bisexual: The lasting impact of initial disclosure experiences. Self and Identity, 14(5),549-569.
[65] Ryan, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1),99-112.
[66] Schlegel, R. J., & Hicks, J. A. (2011). The true self and psychological health: Emerging evidence and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12),989-1003.
[67] Schlegel, R. J., Hicks, J. A., King, L. A., & Arndt, J. (2011). Feeling like you know who you are: Perceived true self-knowledge and meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6),745-756.
URLpmid: 21402753
[68] Schmader, T., & Sedikides, C. (2018). State authenticity as fit to environment: The implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3),228-259.
[69] Sedikides, C., Slabu, L., Lenton, A., & Thomaes, S. (2017). State authenticity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6),521-525.
[70] Strohminger, N., Knobe, J., & Newman, G. (2017). The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4),551-560.
URLpmid: 28671854
[71] Swann, W. B. (1990). To be adored or to be known:The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol.2, pp.408-448). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
[72] Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[73] Thomaes, S., Sedikides, C., van den Bos, N., Hutteman, R., & Reijntjes, A. (2017). Happy to be “me?” Authenticity, psychological need satisfaction, and subjective well-being in adolescence. Child Development, 88(4),1045-1056.
URLpmid: 28598498
[74] van den Bosch, R., & Taris, T. (2018). Authenticity at work: Its relations with worker motivation and well-being. Frontiers in Communication, 3(21),1-11.
[75] van Petegem, S., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Beyers, W. (2015). Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self-determination theory. Child Development, 86(3),903-918.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12355URLpmid: 25702962
[76] Vazire, S., & Carlson, E. N. (2010). Self-knowledge of personality: Do people know themselves?. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8),605-620.
[77] Wang, Y. N., & Li, Z. (2018). Authenticity as a mediator of the relationship between power contingent self-esteem and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 9,1066.
URLpmid: 29997554
[78] Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The authentic personality: A theoretical and empirical conceptualization and the development of the authenticity scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(3),385-399.
[79] Yang, K. S. (1995). Chinese social orientation:An integrative analysis. In T. Y. Lin, W. S. Tseng, & E. K. Yeh (Eds.), Chinese Societies and Mental Health (pp.19-39). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.




[1]汤一鹏, 任芷宇, 蒲小萍, 韩韦. 人际真诚在同事互动及团队工作中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 597-609.
[2]屈国梁, 曹晓君. 同胞冲突及其解决:家庭子系统的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 286-295.
[3]陈国典, 杨通平. 正念对亲密关系的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1551-1563.
[4]郑方, 孙秀丽, 郝喜玲. 员工社会资本跨层次契合的动态演化过程及双向作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 206-219.
[5]刘文娟, 董及美, 崔梦舒, 陈功香. 成人在语境中的母语词汇意义学习[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1574-1584.
[6]訾红岩, 何嘉梅. 自我-他人重叠及其相关概念辨析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1238-1247.
[7]龚艳萍, 陈卓, 谢菊兰, 谢笑春. 手机冷落行为的前因、后果与作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1258-1267.
[8]蒋丽, 张意如, 李锋. 自主安全动机与安全绩效的多水平模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1141-1152.
[9]孙连荣, 王沛. 和谐医患关系的心理机制及其促进技术[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 951-964.
[10]程刚, 贾云丞, 丁芳媛, 张大均, 陈加, 龙女. 表情对婴儿面孔图式效应的调节及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 761-772.
[11]吴迪, 顾晶金, 李明, 张淼, 张明, 赵科, 傅小兰. 动作的主动控制感与因果关系的主动控制感:主动动作时间压缩效应的产生机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 804-810.
[12]吕小康, 唐磊, 姜鹤, 汪新建. 常人疾病观及其对医患关系的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(4): 676-688.
[13]白晓宇, TawandaS.Mutusva, 祝卓宏. PEAK关系训练系统:孤独症语言障碍康复的新方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(11): 1896-1905.
[14]王浩, 俞国良. 浪漫关系中的关系攻击[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 106-116.
[15]吴才智, 荣硕, 朱芳婷, 谌燕, 郭永玉. 基本心理需要及其满足 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 1063-1073.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5432
相关话题/心理 科学 社会 社会学 心理学

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 基于社交媒体数据的心理指标识别建模: 机器学习的方法
    苏悦1,2,刘明明1,3,赵楠1,刘晓倩1,朱廷劭1,2()1中国科学院心理研究所,北京1001012中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000493联想研究院,北京100094收稿日期:2020-01-14出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22基金资助:国家社科基金重点项目(17A ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人际互动中社会学习的计算神经机制
    黎穗卿,陈新玲,翟瑜竹,张怡洁,章植鑫,封春亮()教育部脑认知与教育科学重点实验室(华南师范大学);华南师范大学心理学院;华南师范大学心理应用研究中心;华南师范大学广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室,广州510631收稿日期:2020-08-10出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于游戏的心理测评
    徐俊怡,李中权()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-05-24出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李中权E-mail:zqli@nju.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社科规划基金项目(20YJA190004);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 社会互动加工的认知特性及脑机制——第三人称的视角
    程羽慧,袁祥勇(),蒋毅中国科学院心理研究所,脑与认知科学国家重点实验室,脑科学与智能技术卓越创新中心,北京100101;中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049;北京脑科学与类脑研究中心,北京102206收稿日期:2020-05-14出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 恐惧管理理论的争议及其对死亡心理研究的启示
    孟祥寒1,李强1,2(),周彦榜1,王进31南开大学社会心理学系,天津3003502南开大学滨海学院,天津3002703天津职业技术师范大学,天津300222收稿日期:2020-02-29出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李强E-mail:liqiangp@126 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 亲社会行为中的从众效应
    魏真瑜1(),邓湘树1,赵治瀛21西南财经大学社会发展研究院,成都6111302耶鲁大学医学院,美国收稿日期:2020-03-31出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:魏真瑜E-mail:weizhenyu@swufe.edu.cn基金资助:西南财经大学中央高校基本科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 敬畏的心理模型及其认知神经机制
    赵小红1,2,童薇3,陈桃林1,2(),吴冬梅4,张蕾1,2,陈正举1,方晓义3,龚启勇1,2,唐小蓉21四川大学华西医院放射科华西磁共振研究中心,成都6100412四川大学公共管理学院社会学与心理学系,成都6100653北京师范大学心理学部,北京1008754成都市第四人民医院,成都610036收 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析
    叶静,张戌凡()南京师范大学金陵女子学院,南京210097收稿日期:2020-07-23出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:张戌凡E-mail:xufanzhang@163.com基金资助:国家自然科学青年基金项目“工会实践对员工工作幸福感的影响:基于工具-情感的双 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 催产素调控心理韧性:基于对海马的作用机制
    薛冰,王雪娇,马宁,高军()认知与人格教育部重点实验室,重庆400715收稿日期:2020-04-27出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:高军E-mail:gaojunscience@126.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金(32071059);重庆市自然科学基金( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 计算模型视角下信任形成的心理和神经机制——基于信任博弈中投资者的角度
    高青林,周媛()中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京100101中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2020-04-18出版日期:2021-01-15发布日期:2020-11-23通讯作者:周媛E-mail:zhouyuan@psych.ac.cn基金资助:*中国科学院心理研究 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01