删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

计算模型视角下信任形成的心理和神经机制——基于信任博弈中投资者的角度

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

高青林, 周媛()
中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室, 北京 100101
中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
收稿日期:2020-04-18出版日期:2021-01-15发布日期:2020-11-23
通讯作者:周媛E-mail:zhouyuan@psych.ac.cn

基金资助:* 中国科学院心理研究所项目(E0CX163008)

Psychological and neural mechanisms of trust formation: A perspective from computational modeling based on the decision of investor in the trust game

GAO Qinglin, ZHOU Yuan()
Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Received:2020-04-18Online:2021-01-15Published:2020-11-23
Contact:ZHOU Yuan E-mail:zhouyuan@psych.ac.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 人际信任渗透在社会交互的各个方面, 是促进和维持合作的重要基石。以往研究者借助信任博弈范式, 主要探讨了人际信任的理论模型、生物基础和影响因素等方面。近年来, 研究者开始将计算模型应用于信任博弈的数据分析中, 深入挖掘人际信任行为背后的心理机制, 将计算模型与神经影像技术结合, 加深对信任行为背后脑机制的理解。目前将计算模型应用于信任博弈范式中的研究主要针对“信任是如何形成的”这一科学问题, 未来要进一步发展计算模型方法, 结合非侵入性脑刺激技术, 应用于精神疾病人群中, 以深入理解正常和异常信任形成的心理和神经机制。



图1重复信任博弈范式的示意图
图1重复信任博弈范式的示意图



图2强化学习模型框架图 资料来源:Fouragnan (2013)
图2强化学习模型框架图 资料来源:Fouragnan (2013)



图3贝叶斯模型框架图 资料来源:Friston et al., 2013
图3贝叶斯模型框架图 资料来源:Friston et al., 2013







[1] 陈欣, 叶浩生. (2009). 行为博弈视野下信任研究的回顾. 心理科学, 32(3), 636-639.
[2] 陈瀛, 徐敏霞, 汪新建. (2020). 信任的认知神经网络模型. 心理科学进展, 28(5), 800-809.
[3] 荣悦彤, 王晓明, 周媛. (2019). 非侵入性脑刺激技术在决策行为研究中的应用. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 28(7), 666-670.
[4] 史燕伟, 徐富明, 罗教讲, 李燕, 刘程浩. (2015). 行为经济学中的信任: 形成机制及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 23(7), 1236-1244.
[5] 张宁, 张雨青, 吴坎坎. (2011). 信任的心理和神经生理机制. 心理科学, 34(5), 1137-1143.
[6] 张蔚, 张振, 高宇, 段华平, 吴兴南. (2016). 经济决策中人际信任博弈的理论模型与脑机制. 心理科学进展, 24(11), 1780-1791.
[7] Anderhub, V., Engelmann, D., & Güth, W. (2002). An experimental study of the repeated trust game with incomplete information. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48(2), 197-216.
[8] Ben-Ner, A., Putterman, L., & Ren, T. (2011). Lavish returns on cheap talk: Two-way communication in trust games. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 1-13.
doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2010.09.009URL
[9] Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142.
[10] Blue, P. R., Hu, J., Peng, L., Yu, H. B., Liu, H. Y., & Zhou, X. L. (2020). Whose promises are worth more? How social status affects trust in promises. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(1), 189-206.
[11] Chang, L. J., Doll, B. B., van't Wout, M., Frank, M. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). Seeing is believing: Trustworthiness as a dynamic belief. Cognitive Psychology, 61(2), 87-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.03.001URLpmid: 20553763
[12] Charpentier, C. J., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2018). The application of computational models to social neuroscience: Promises and pitfalls. Social Neuroscience, 13(6), 637-647.
URLpmid: 30173633
[13] Cheong, J. H., Jolly, E., Sul, S., & Chang, L. J. (2017). Computational models in social neuroscience. In A. Moustafa (Ed.), Computational models of brain and behavior(pp. 229-244). Wiley.
URLpmid: 25365806
[14] Cisler, J. M., Bush, K., Scott Steele, J., Lenow, J. K., Smitherman, S., & Kilts, C. D. (2015). Brain and behavioral evidence for altered social learning mechanisms among women with assault-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 63, 75-83.
URLpmid: 25769397
[15] Claus, C., & Boutilier, C. (1998, July). The dynamics of reinforcement learning in cooperative multiagent systems. Paper presented at the meeting of the Proceedings of the fifteenth national/tenth conference on Artificial Intelligence/ Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, California, United States.
[16] Cochard, F., van Nguyen, P., & Willinger, M. (2004). Trusting behavior in a repeated investment game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(1), 31-44.
[17] Daw, N. D., & Doya, K. (2006). The computational neurobiology of learning and reward. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2), 199-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.006URLpmid: 16563737
[18] Declerck, C. H., Boone, C., & Emonds, G. (2013). When do people cooperate? The neuroeconomics of prosocial decision making. Brain and Cognition, 81(1), 95-117.
URLpmid: 23174433
[19] Diaconescu, A. O., Mathys, C., Weber, L. A. E., Daunizeau, J., Kasper, L., Lomakina, E. I., ... Stephan, K. E. (2014). Inferring on the intentions of others by hierarchical Bayesian learning. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(9), e1003952.
[20] Engelmann, J. B. (2010). Measuring trust in social neuroeconomics: A Tutorial. Hermeneutische Bl?tter, 1(2), 225-242.
[21] Fareri, D. S., Chang, L. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2012). Effects of direct social experience on trust decisions and neural reward circuitry. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 148.
URLpmid: 23087604
[22] Fareri, D. S., Chang, L. J., & Delgado, M. R. (2015). Computational substrates of social value in interpersonal collaboration. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(21), 8170-8180.
URLpmid: 26019333
[23] Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism - Experimental evidence and new theories. In S. Kolm., & J. Ythier.(Eds), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity
[24] Fett, A. -K. J., Gromann, P. M., Giampietro, V., Shergill, S. S., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Default distrust? An fMRI investigation of the neural development of trust and cooperation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(4), 395-402.
URLpmid: 23202661
[25] Fouragnan, E. (2013). The neural computation of trust and reputation. Biochemistry, 52(29), 4941-54.
doi: 10.1021/bi400178qURL
[26] Friston, K., Fitzgerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., & Pezzulo, G. (2016). Active inference and learning. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Review, 68, 862-879.
[27] Friston, K., Schwartenbeck, P., Fitzgerald, T., Moutoussis, M., Behrens, T., & Dolan, R. J. (2013). The anatomy of choice: Active inference and agency. Frontiers Humman Neuroscience, 7, 598.
[28] Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., Montague, R., & Dolan, R. (2014). Computational psychiatry: The brain as a phantastic organ. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1(2), 148-158.
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70275-5URL
[29] Gonzalez, B., & Chang, L. J. (2019). Computational models of mentalizing. PsyArXiv. Advance online publication.
[30] Gu, X. S., Wang, X. C., Hula, A., Wang, S. W., Xu, S., Lohrenz, T. M., ... Montague, P. R. (2015). Necessary, yet dissociable contributions of the insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortices to norm adaptation: Computational and lesion evidence in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(2), 467-473.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2906-14.2015URLpmid: 25589742
[31] Hackel, L. M., & Amodio, D. M. (2018). Computational neuroscience approaches to social cognition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, 92-97.
URLpmid: 30388495
[32] Haiyan, L. (2019). Dynamic trust game model between venture capitalists and entrepreneurs based on reinforcement learning theory. Cluster Computing, 22(3), 5893-5904.
doi: 10.1007/s10586-017-1666-xURL
[33] Hula, A., Montague, P. R., & Dayan, P. (2015). Monte carlo planning method estimates planning horizons during interactive social exchange. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(6), e1004254.
URLpmid: 26053429
[34] Huys, Q. J. M., Moutoussis, M., & Williams, J. (2011). Are computational models of any use to psychiatry? Neural Networks, 24(6), 544-551.
URLpmid: 21459554
[35] Jaafra, Y., Laurent, J. L., Deruyver, A., & Naceur, M. S. (2019). Reinforcement learning for neural architecture search: A review. Image and Vision Computing, 89, 57-66.
[36] Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865-889.
[37] Jung, W. -M., Lee, Y. -S., Wallraven, C., & Chae, Y. (2017). Bayesian prediction of placebo analgesia in an instrumental learning model. PLoS One, 12(2), e0172609.
URLpmid: 28225816
[38] Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Cassandra, A. R. (1995). Partially observable Markov decision processes for artificial intelligence. Paper Presented at the International Workshop on Reasoning with Uncertainty in Robotics.
URLpmid: 19777080
[39] Keser, C. (2003). Experimental games for the design of reputation management systems. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 498-506.
[40] Khalvati, K., Park, S. A., Mirbagheri, S., Philippe, R., & Rao, R. P. N. (2019). Modeling other minds: Bayesian inference explains human choices in group decision-making. Science Advances, 5(11), eaax8783.
URLpmid: 32064310
[41] King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308(5718), 78-83.
URLpmid: 15802598
[42] King-Casas, B., Sharp, C., Lomax-Bream, L., Lohrenz, T., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science, 321(5890), 806-810.
URLpmid: 18687957
[43] Knoch, D., Schneider, F., Schunk, D., Hohmann, M., & Fehr, E. (2009). Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(49), 20895-20899.
[44] Kreps, D. M. (1990). Corporate culture and economic theory. Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, 90, 109-110.
[45] Krueger, F., McCabe, K., Moll, J., Kriegeskorte, N., Zahn, R., Strenziok, M., ... Grafman, J. (2007). Neural correlates of trust. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 20084-20089.
[46] Krueger, F., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2019). Toward a model of interpersonal trust drawn from neuroscience, psychology, and economics. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(2), 92-101.
URLpmid: 30482606
[47] Lee, D., Seo, H., & Jung, M. W. (2012). Neural basis of reinforcement learning and decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 287-308.
URLpmid: 22462543
[48] Luo, Y., Hétu, S., Lohrenz, T., Hula, A., & Ramey, C. (2018). Early childhood investment impacts social decision- making four decades later. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1-10.
URLpmid: 29317637
[49] Ma, Q. G., Liang, M., Qiang, S., & Yu, R. J. (2015). You have my word: Reciprocity expectation modulates feedback-related negativity in the trust game. Plos One, 10(2), e0119129.
URLpmid: 25719408
[50] Mathys, C., Daunizeau, J., Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2011). A Bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 39.
URLpmid: 21629826
[51] Maurer, C., Chambon, V., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Leboyer, M., & Zalla, T. (2018). The influence of prior reputation and reciprocity on dynamic trust-building in adults with and without autism spectrum disorder. Cognition, 172, 1-10.
URLpmid: 29197230
[52] McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., & Smith, V. L. (2003). Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52(2), 267-275.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00003-9URL
[53] Mellick, W., Sharp, C., & Ernst, M. (2019). Depressive adolescent girls exhibt atypical social decision-making in an iterative trust game. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 224-244.
doi: 10.1521/jscp.2019.38.3.224URL
[54] Montague, P. R. (2018). Computational phenotypes revealed by interactive economic games. In A, Anticevic & J, D. Murray (Eds), Computational psychiatry: Mathematical modeling of mental illness (pp. 273-292). Academic Press
[55] Montague, P. R., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., & Dayan, P. (2012). Computational psychiatry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(1), 72-80.
URLpmid: 22177032
[56] Moutoussis, M., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., El-Deredy, W., Dolan, R., & Friston, K. (2014). A formal model of interpersonal inference. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 160.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00160URLpmid: 24723872
[57] Nihonsugi, T., Ihara, A., & Haruno, M. (2015). Selective increase of intention-based economic decisions by noninvasive brain stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(8), 3412-3419.
URLpmid: 25716841
[58] O'Doherty, J. P., Hampton, A., & Kim, H. (2007). Model- based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104(1), 35-53.
[59] Ong, D. C., Zaki, J., & Goodman, N. D. (2019). Computational models of emotion inference in theory of mind: A review and roadmap. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(2), 338-357.
URLpmid: 30066475
[60] Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2017). Working memory, attention, and salience in active inference. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1), 1-21.
[61] Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does a chimpanzee have a theory of mind. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515-526.
[62] Puterman, M. L. (1995). Markov decision processes: Discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(6), 792-792.
[63] Radell, M. L., Sanchez, R., Weinflash, N., & Myers, C. E. (2016). The personality trait of behavioral inhibition modulates perceptions of moral character and performance during the trust game: Behavioral results and computational modeling. PeerJ-the Journal of Life & Environmental Sciences, 4, e1631.
[64] Ray, D., King-Casas, B., Montague, P. R., & Dayan, P. (2009). Bayesian model of behaviour in economic games. In D. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio & L. Bottou. (Eds), Advances in neural information processing systems
URLpmid: 30971864
[65] Riedl, R., & Javor, A. (2012). The biology of trust: Integrating evidence from genetics, endocrinology, and functional brain imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 5(2), 63-91.
[66] Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651-665.
URLpmid: 4865583
[67] Rusch, T., & Gl?scher, J. (2019). Classification of theory of mind tasks and their computational models. PsyArXiv. Advance online publication.
[68] Sanfey, A. G. (2007). Social decision-making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science, 318(5850), 598-602.
URLpmid: 17962552
[69] Schwartenbeck, P., FitzGerald, T. H. B., Mathys, C., Dolan, R., Kronbichler, M., & Friston, K. (2015). Evidence for surprise minimization over value maximization in choice behavior. Scientific Reports, 5, 16575.
URLpmid: 26564686
[70] Smith, R., Khalsa, S. S., & Paulus, M. P. (2019). An active inference approach to dissecting reasons for nonadherence to antidepressants. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.012
URLpmid: 12798984
[71] Smith, R., Lane, R. D., Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2019). Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying emotional awareness: Insights afforded by deep active inference and their potential clinical relevance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 107, 473-491.
URLpmid: 31518636
[72] Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (2001). Do you trust? Whom do you trust? When do you trust?. Advances in Group Processes, 18(18), 129-160.
[73] Stephan, K. E., & Mathys, C. (2014). Computational approaches to psychiatry. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 85-92.
URLpmid: 24709605
[74] Tzieropoulos, H. (2013). The trust game in neuroscience: A short review. Social Neuroscience, 8(5), 407-416.
URLpmid: 23998424
[75] Wehebrink, K. S., Koelkebeck, K., Piest, S., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Kret, M. E. (2018). Pupil mimicry and trust - Implication for depression. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 97, 70-76.
URLpmid: 29202275
[76] Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. (2006). Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 189-202.
[77] Xiang, T., Ray, D., Lohrenz, T., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (2012). Computational phenotyping of two-person interactions reveals differential neural response to depth- of-thought. PLoS Computtational Biology, 8(12), e1002841.
[78] Zheng, H. L., Wang, S. Q., Guo, W. M., Chen, S., Luo, J., Ye, H., & Huang, D. Q. (2017). Enhancing the activity of the DLPFC with tDCS alters risk preference without changing interpersonal trust. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, 52.
URLpmid: 28232785




[1]黎穗卿, 陈新玲, 翟瑜竹, 张怡洁, 章植鑫, 封春亮. 人际互动中社会学习的计算神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 677-696.
[2]贡喆, 唐玉洁, 刘昌. 信任博弈范式真的能测量信任吗?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 19-30.
[3]张银花, 李红, 吴寅. 计算模型在道德认知研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1042-1055.
[4]李精精, 张剑, 田慧荣, Jeffrey B.Vancouver. 动态计算模型在组织行为学研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 368-380.
[5]区健新, 吴寅, 刘金婷, 李红. 计算精神病学:抑郁症研究和临床应用的新视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 111-127.
[6]辛自强. 市场化与人际信任变迁[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 1951-1966.
[7]魏柳青, 张学民. 多目标追踪的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2007-2018.
[8]段凯凯, 董昊铭, 苗丽雯, 苏学权, 相洁, 左西年. 人脑自适应多尺度功能连接的性别差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1567-1575.
[9]李雅; 李晟. 轮廓整合的时空动态加工机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 60-.
[10]王沛;梁雅君;李宇;刘雍鹤. 特质认知和关系认知对人际信任的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(5): 815-823.
[11]张蔚; 张振;高宇;段华平;吴兴南. 经济决策中人际信任博弈的理论模型与脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(11): 1780-1791.
[12]张芬;王穗苹;杨娟华;冯刚毅. 自闭症谱系障碍者异常的大脑功能连接[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(7): 1196-1204.
[13]程凯;曹贵康. 走神的理论假设、影响因素及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(9): 1435-1445.
[14]赵竞;孙晓军;周宗奎;魏华;牛更枫. 网络交往中的人际信任[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(8): 1493-1501.
[15]辛自强;窦东徽;陈超. 学经济学降低人际信任?经济类专业学习对大学生人际信任的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(1): 31-36.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5305
相关话题/心理 科学 计算 神经 技术

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 《心理科学进展》2020年度审稿专家名录
    出版日期:2021-01-15发布日期:2021-01-08Online:2021-01-15Published:2021-01-08摘要/Abstract参考文献相关文章0Norelatedarticlesfound!PDF全文下载地址:http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlk ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 高社交焦虑者识别动态情绪面孔的神经机制
    冉光明1(),李睿1,张琪21西华师范大学教育学院心理系2西华师范大学学前与初等教育学院,四川南充637002收稿日期:2020-04-13出版日期:2020-12-15发布日期:2020-10-26通讯作者:冉光明E-mail:haiqi198649@163.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 《心理科学进展》2020年度审稿专家名录
    出版日期:2021-01-15发布日期:2021-01-08Online:2021-01-15Published:2021-01-08摘要/Abstract参考文献相关文章0Norelatedarticlesfound!PDF全文下载地址:http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlk ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人类性别加工的认知神经机制
    杨国春1,2,伍海燕3,4,齐玥5,6,1,2,刘勋1,2()1中国科学院行为科学重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000493澳门大学认知与脑科学研究中心4澳门大学心理系,澳门9990785中国人民大学心理学系6中国人民大学心理学系实验室,北京100872收稿日期:202 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 食物线索注意偏向及其神经机制
    李灵,侯晓旭,张亚,隋雪()辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连116029收稿日期:2020-07-20出版日期:2020-12-15发布日期:2020-10-26通讯作者:隋雪E-mail:suixue88@163.com基金资助:教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目(19YJA190005);国家自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 独立、协同和平衡视角下的单维式基本心理需要满足
    陈晨,刘玉新(),赵晨对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京100029收稿日期:2019-12-05出版日期:2020-12-15发布日期:2020-10-26通讯作者:刘玉新E-mail:liuyuxin@uibe.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(72074024);国家自然科学基金项目( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 价值观的稳定性与可变性:基于认知神经科学的视角
    岳童,黄希庭(),徐颖,潘思存西南大学心理学部,重庆400715收稿日期:2020-03-10出版日期:2020-12-15发布日期:2020-10-26通讯作者:黄希庭E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn基金资助:中央高校基本业务经费一般项目(SWU1809212);国家社科基金青年 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 认知诊断计算机化自适应测验的选题策略
    唐倩1,2,毛秀珍1(),何明霜1,何洁11四川师范大学教育科学学院,成都6100662德阳市东汽小学,四川德阳618000收稿日期:2020-02-06出版日期:2020-12-15发布日期:2020-10-26通讯作者:毛秀珍E-mail:maomao_wanli@163.com基金资助:国家自 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 自我损耗降低决策理性:心理机制与边界条件
    马钰1,肖晨洁2,车敬上1,王海侠3(),李爱梅1()1暨南大学管理学院,广州5106322湖南第一师范学院商学院,长沙4102053暨南大学新闻与传播学院,广州510632收稿日期:2020-04-06出版日期:2020-11-15发布日期:2020-09-23通讯作者:王海侠,李爱梅E-mail ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 半个多世纪来中国人的心理与行为变化——心理学视野下的研究
    蔡华俭1,2(),黄梓航1,2,林莉3,张明杨1,2,王潇欧1,2,朱慧珺1,2,谢怡萍1,2,杨盈1,2,杨紫嫣1,2,敬一鸣1,21中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京1001012中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000493浙江省教育科学研究院普教所,杭州310012收稿日期:202 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01