删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

个体如何以消费行为应对自我威胁?基于导向-路径整合模型的分析

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

孙洪杰1, 刘菲菲1, 冯文婷1(), 崔丙群2
1海南大学管理学院, 海口 570228
2山东农业大学经济管理学院, 泰安 271018
收稿日期:2020-05-14出版日期:2021-05-15发布日期:2021-03-30
通讯作者:冯文婷E-mail:wtfeng@hainanu.edu.cn

基金资助:海南省自然科学基金高层次人才项目(2019RC102);国家自然科学基金项目(72062013);国家自然科学基金项目(71902120)

How do individuals cope self-threats with consuming behaviors? Analysis based on the orientation-path integration model

SUN Hongjie1, LIU Feifei1, FENG Wenting1(), CUI Bingqun2
1Management School, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2College of Economics and Management, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
Received:2020-05-14Online:2021-05-15Published:2021-03-30
Contact:FENG Wenting E-mail:wtfeng@hainanu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 自我威胁无处不在, 以消费应对自我威胁是个体采取的重要方式。但由于自我概念的多维性、应对威胁过程中认知、情感、情绪等多因素的介入, 以及威胁源和应对行为的交叉性等原因, 当前的研究呈现出结论分散、不连贯, 甚至矛盾的情形。基于导向-路径的整合模型回顾了消费行为领域自我威胁研究的动态, 归纳出个体的多种自我威胁应对策略, 揭示了不同应对策略间的多层次交叉补偿机理, 以及自我威胁与消费行为间的多重关联方式, 并揭示出个体通过产品的全价值系统和自身的全感知系统进行自我威胁应对。基于导向-路径整合模型有助于对消费行为领域自我威胁应对研究形成整体连贯的认知, 揭示其内在规律, 并有助于理解当前环境(新冠肺炎疫情)下的个体消费行为。



图1导向-路径整合模型
图1导向-路径整合模型


表1个体自我威胁消费应对策略
趋近导向 规避导向
个人自我
路径
内在趋近策略
□直接内在修复
□同源象征性修复
?匹配策略
?情感联结
?资源等级强化
□异源象征性补偿
内在规避策略
□威胁分离策略
□逃避策略
?抚慰
?注意力转移
?遗忘
□认知重构
社会自我
路径
社会趋近策略
□直接社会修复
?从众消费
?攀比消费
□同源象征性修复:
?象征关联
?社会等级强化
□异源象征性补偿
社会规避策略
□参照群体规避
□身份关联规避

表1个体自我威胁消费应对策略
趋近导向 规避导向
个人自我
路径
内在趋近策略
□直接内在修复
□同源象征性修复
?匹配策略
?情感联结
?资源等级强化
□异源象征性补偿
内在规避策略
□威胁分离策略
□逃避策略
?抚慰
?注意力转移
?遗忘
□认知重构
社会自我
路径
社会趋近策略
□直接社会修复
?从众消费
?攀比消费
□同源象征性修复:
?象征关联
?社会等级强化
□异源象征性补偿
社会规避策略
□参照群体规避
□身份关联规避







[1] 陈瑞, 郑毓煌. (2015). 孤独感对不确定消费偏好的影响: 新产品、产品包装和概率促销中的表现. 心理学报, 47(8),1067-1076.
[2] 崔宏静, 金晓彤, 赵太阳, 王天新. (2016). 自我认同对地位消费行为意愿的双路径影响机制研究. 管理学报, 13(7),1028-1037.
[3] 崔宏静, 徐尉, 赵太阳, 王天新. (2018). 自我认同威胁对消费者地位产品选择的影响研究—基于权力距离信念的调节效应和地位需求的中介效应. 南开管理评论, 21(6),210-220.
[4] 邓晓辉, 戴俐秋. (2005). 炫耀性消费理论及其最新进展. 外国经济与管理, 27(4),2-9.
[5] 丁瑛, 宫秀双. (2016). 社会排斥对产品触觉信息偏好的影响及其作用机制. 心理学报, 48(10),1302-1313.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01302URL
[6] 杜伟宇, 许伟清. (2014). 中国情境下权力对炫耀性产品购买意愿的影响: 面子意识的中介效应. 南开管理评论, 17(5),83-90.
[7] 樊茜. (2018). 社会排斥影响下个体不确定性规避消费偏好的形成机制研究 (博士学位论文). 吉林大学.
[8] 郭晓琳, 林德荣. (2015). 中国本土消费者的面子意识与消费行为研究述评. 外国经济与管理, 37(11),63-71.
[9] 郝放, 庞隽, 刘晓梅. (2018). 不同类型的社会排斥对消费者形状偏好的影响机制. 中国流通经济, 32(8),70-78.
[10] 江红艳, 王宇, 吉峰, 孙配贞. (2016). 社会排斥对老字号品牌激活策略效果的影响——时间取向的中介作用. 管理评论, 28(11),95-105.
[11] 金晓彤, 王贺峰, 王天新. (2017). 中国消费者基于符号意义的炫耀性消费行为实证研究. 数量经济研究, 3(1),91-107.
[12] 金晓彤, 赵太阳, 崔宏静, 徐尉, 李广政. (2017). 地位感知变化对消费者地位消费行为的影响. 心理学报, 49(2),273-284.
[13] 柳武妹, 王海忠, 何浏. (2014). 人之将尽, 消费国货? 死亡信息的暴露增加国货选择的现象、中介和边界条件解析. 心理学报, 46(11),1748-1759.
[14] 刘尊礼, 余明阳. (2016). 内隐自我作用下社会排斥对炫耀性消费的影响. 工业工程与管理, 21(4),152-158.
[15] 宋晓兵, 聂春艳, 徐丽丽.(2012). 炫耀还是低调? 面子损失对消费者品牌标识偏好的影响研究. 营销科学学报, 8(3), 63-75.
[16] 王财玉, 孙天义, 何安明, 惠秋平, 崔磊. (2013). 社会地位感知与地位消费倾向: 自尊的恐惧管理. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(1),74-76.
[17] 王春晓, 朱虹. (2016). 地位焦虑、物质主义与炫耀性消费——中国人物质主义倾向的现状、前因及后果. 北京社会科学, (5),31-40.
[18] 王长征, 崔楠. (2011). 个性消费, 还是地位消费——中国人的“面子”如何影响象征型的消费者-品牌关系. 经济管理, 33(6),84-90.
[19] 汪涛, 周玲, 彭传新. (2011). 消费者不安全感与怀旧产品购买行为研究. 经济管理, 33(1),83-92.
[20] 杨德锋, 江霞, 宋倩文. (2019). 消费者何时愿意选择与规避群体关联的品牌? 心理学报, 51(6),699-713.
[21] 杨敬舒, 晁钢令. (2009). 中国居民攀比性消费行为的成因和影响研究. 消费经济, (6),51-54.
[22] 郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 戴珊姗. (2014). 社会比较对炫耀性消费的影响: 心理补偿的视角. 营销科学学报, 10(3),19-31.
[23] Allard, T., & White, K. (2015). Cross-domain effects of guilt on desire for self-improvement products. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(3),401-419.
[24] Aquino, K., & Reed, I. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6),1423-1440.
URLpmid: 12500822
[25] Batra, R. K., & Ghoshal, T. (2017). Fill up your senses: A theory of self-worth restoration through high-intensity sensory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(4),916-938.
[26] Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2),139-168.
[27] Bell, B. T., & Dittmar, H. (2011). Does media type matter? The role of identification in adolescent girls’ media consumption and the impact of different thin-ideal media on body image. Sex Roles, 65(7-8),478.
[28] Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2008). Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 95(3),593-607.
URLpmid: 18729697
[29] Bozkurt, S., & Gligor, D. (2019). Scarcity (versus popularity) cues for rejected customers: The impact of social exclusion on cue types through need for uniqueness. Journal of Business Research, 99,275-281.
[30] Burns, R. B. (1979). The self concept in theory, measurement, development and behaviour. London: Longman.
[31] Campbell, W. K., & Sedikides, C. (1999). Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration. Review of General Psychology, 3(1),23-43.
[32] Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2),319-333.
[33] Charles, K. K., Hurst, E., & Roussanov, N. (2009). Conspicuous consumption and race. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2),425-467.
[34] Chen, R. P., Wan, E. W., & Levy, E. (2017). The effect of social exclusion on consumer preference for anthropomorphized brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1),23-34.
[35] Choi, T. R., Choi, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2019). I hope to protect myself from the threat: The impact of self-threat on prevention-versus promotion-focused hope. Journal of Business Research, 99,481-489.
[36] Coleman, N. V., Williams, P., & Morales, A. C. (2019). Identity threats, compensatory consumption, and working memory capacity: How feeling threatened leads to heightened evaluations of identity-relevant products. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1),99-118.
[37] Cornil, Y., & Chandon, P. (2013). From fan to fat? Vicarious losing increases unhealthy eating, but self-affirmation is an effective remedy. Psychological Science, 24(10),1936-1946.
URLpmid: 23925307
[38] Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2015). Self-affirmations provide a broader perspective on self-threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1),3-18.
URLpmid: 25319717
[39] Cutright, K. M. (2012). The beauty of boundaries: When and why we seek structure in consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5),775-790.
[40] Cutright, K. M., Wu, E. C., Banfield, J. C., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2011). When your world must be defended: Choosing products to justify the system. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1),62-77.
[41] Dalton, A. N. (2008). Look on the bright side: Self-expressive consumption and consumer self-worth (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Duke University.
[42] Dalton, A. N., & Huang, L. (2014). Motivated forgetting in response to social identity threat. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6),1017-1038.
[43] Dufner, M., Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2019). Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(1),48-72.
URLpmid: 29534642
[44] Duhachek, A., Agrawal, N., & Han, D. (2012). Guilt versus shame: Coping, fluency, and framing in the effectiveness of responsible drinking messages. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6),928-941.
[45] Duhachek, A., & Oakley, J. L. (2007). Mapping the hierarchical structure of coping: Unifying empirical and theoretical perspectives. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3),216-233.
[46] Englis, B. G., & Solomon, M. R. (1995). To be and not to be: Lifestyle imagery, reference groups, and the clustering of America. Journal of Advertising, 24(1),13-28.
[47] Ferraro, R., Shiv, B., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die: Effects of mortality salience and self-esteem on self-regulation in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1),65-75.
[48] Finkelstein, S. R., Xu, X. M., & Connell, P. M. (2019). When variety is not the spice of life: The influence of perceived relational self-threat on variety seeking in snack choices. Appetite, 136,154-159.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.001URLpmid: 30721743
[49] Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., & Fankh?nel, T. (2008). The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3),524-541.
URLpmid: 18729692
[50] Gao, L. L., Wheeler, S. C., & Shiv, B. (2009). The “shaken self”: Product choices as a means of restoring self-view confidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(1),29-38.
[51] Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L., & Suls, J. (2018). A social comparison theory meta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2),177-197.
URLpmid: 29144145
[52] Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, R. B., & Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2),227-236.
[53] Goodyear, L. (2018). When not having enough prompts consumers to show off: Reminders of resource scarcity prompt Narcissism (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Concordia University, Montreal.
[54] Gurzki, H., & Woisetschl?ger, D. M. (2017). Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 77,147-166.
[55] Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Rucker, D. D. (2015). Distinct threats, common remedies: How consumers cope with psychological threat. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4),531-545.
[56] Heatherton, T. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Binge eating as escape from self-awareness. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1),86-108.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.86URLpmid: 1891520
[57] Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3),319-340.
URLpmid: 3615707
[58] IJzerman, H., Gallucci, M., Pouw, W. T. J. L., Weiβgerber, S. C., van Doesum, N. J., & Williams, K. D. (2012). Cold-blooded loneliness: Social exclusion leads to lower skin temperatures. Acta Psychologica, 140(3),283-288.
URLpmid: 22717422
[59] Inesi, M. E., Botti, S., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Power and choice: Their dynamic interplay in quenching the thirst for personal control. Psychological Science, 22(8),1042-1048.
URLpmid: 21705519
[60] Kastanakis, M. N., & Balabanis, G. (2014). Explaining variation in conspicuous luxury consumption: An individual differences' perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(10),2147-2154.
[61] Kim, S., & Gal, D. (2014). From compensatory consumption to adaptive consumption: The role of self-acceptance in resolving self-deficits. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2),526-542.
[62] Kim, S., & Rucker, D. D. (2012). Bracing for the psychological storm: Proactive versus reactive compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4),815-830.
[63] Koles, B., Wells, V., & Tadajewski, M. (2018). Compensatory consumption and consumer compromises: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(1-2),96-133.
[64] Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3),530-544.
doi: 10.1086/664039URL
[65] Lee, S. Y., & Jang, K. (2019). Antecedents of impression management motivations on social network sites and their link to social anxiety. Media Psychology, 22(6),890-904.
[66] Levav, J., & Zhu, R. (2009). Seeking freedom through variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4),600-610.
[67] Liang, S. C., & Chang, Y. P. (2016). Social exclusion and choice: The moderating effect of power state. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(5),449-458.
[68] Liang, S. C., He, Y., Chang, Y. P., Dong, X., & Zhu, D. H. (2018). Showing to friends or strangers? Relationship orientation influences the effect of social exclusion on conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(4),355-365.
[69] Liu, R. L., Sprott, D. E., Spangenberg, E. R., Czellar, S., & Voss, K. E. (2018). Consumer preference for national vs. private brands: The influence of brand engagement and self-concept threat. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41,90-100.
[70] Loughran Dommer, S., Swaminathan, V., & Ahluwalia, R. (2013). Using differentiated brands to deflect exclusion and protect inclusion: The moderating role of self-esteem on attachment to differentiated brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(4),657-675.
[71] Loveland, K. E., Smeesters, D., & Mandel, N. (2010). Still preoccupied with 1995: The need to belong and preference for nostalgic products. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3),393-408.
[72] Ma, H., Bradshaw, H. K., Janakiraman, N., & Hill, S. E. (2019). Spending as protection: The need for safety increases preference for luxury products. Marketing Letters, 30(1),45-56.
[73] Mandel, N., & Smeesters, D. (2008). The sweet escape: Effects of mortality salience on consumption quantities for high-and low-self-esteem consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2),309-323.
[74] Mason, T. B., Smith, K. E., Engwall, A., Lass, A., Mead, M., Sorby, M.,... Wonderlich, S. (2019). Self-discrepancy theory as a transdiagnostic framework: A meta-analysis of self-discrepancy and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4),372-389.
doi: 10.1037/bul0000186URLpmid: 30640499
[75] Mazzocco, P. J., Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Anderson, E. T. (2012). Direct and vicarious conspicuous consumption: Identification with low-status groups increases the desire for high-status goods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4),520-528.
[76] Mead, N. L., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., Rawn, C. D., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Social exclusion causes people to spend and consume strategically in the service of affiliation. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(5),902-919.
[77] Morrison, K. R., & Johnson, C. S. (2011). When what you have is who you are: Self-uncertainty leads individualists to see themselves in their possessions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5),639-651.
doi: 10.1177/0146167211403158URLpmid: 21487114
[78] Moskalenko, S., & Heine, S. J. (2003). Watching your troubles away: Television viewing as a stimulus for subjective self-awareness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1),76-85.
doi: 10.1177/0146167202238373URLpmid: 15272961
[79] Mourey, J. A., Olson, J. G., & Yoon, C. (2017). Products as pals: Engaging with anthropomorphic products mitigates the effects of social exclusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(2),414-431.
[80] Muller, D., & Fayant, M. P. (2010). On being exposed to superior others: Consequences of self-threatening upward social comparisons. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 4(8),621-634.
[81] Mussweiler, T., Rüter, Katja, & Epstude, K. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87(6),832-844.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.832URLpmid: 15598109
[82] Newman, C. L., Cinelli, M. D., Vorhies, D., & Folse, J. A. G. (2019). Benefitting a few at the expense of many? exclusive promotions and their impact on untargeted customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1),76-79.
[83] Niedenthal, P. M., Setterlund, M. B., & Wherry, M. B. (1992). Possible self-complexity and affective reactions to goal-relevant evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1),5-16.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.63.1.5URLpmid: 1494985
[84] Nira, M., & Yael, S. (2016). Saying no to the glow: When consumers avoid arrogant brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(2),179-192.
[85] Normand, A., & Croizet, J. C. (2013). Upward social comparison generates attentional focusing when the dimension of comparison is self-threatening. Social Cognition, 31(3),336-348.
[86] Onkvisit, S., & Shaw, J. (1987). Self-concept and image congruence: Some research and managerial implications. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 4(1),13-23.
[87] Otterbring, T. (2016). Touch forbidden, consumption allowed: Counter-intuitive effects of touch restrictions on customers’ purchase behavior. Food Quality and Preference, 50,1-6.
[88] Pan, C., Pettit, N. C., Sivanathan, N., & Blader, S. L. (2014). Low-status aversion: The effect of self-threat on willingness to buy and sell. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(11),708-716.
[89] Park, L. E., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Does self-threat promote social connection? the role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1),203-217.
URLpmid: 19210075
[90] Pettit, N. C., & Sivanathan, N. (2011). The plastic trap: Self-threat drives credit usage and status consumption. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2),146-153.
[91] Reczek, R. W., Irwin, J. R., Zane, D. M., & Ehrich, K. R. (2018). That’s not how I remember it: Willfully ignorant memory for ethical product attribute information. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1),185-207.
[92] Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1),5-37.
[93] Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2),257-267.
[94] Rucker, D. D & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3),549-555.
[95] Rucker, D. D., Galinsky, A. D., & Dubois, D. (2012). Power and consumer behavior: How power shapes who and what consumers value. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3),352-368.
[96] Rustagi, N., & Shrum, L. J. (2019). Undermining the Restorative Potential of Compensatory Consumption: A Product’s Explicit Identity Connection Impedes Self-Repair. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1),119-139.
[97] Sharma, E., & Alter, A. L. (2012). Financial deprivation prompts consumers to seek scarce goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3),545-560.
[98] Sirgy, M. J., & Su, C. (2000). Destination image, self-congruity, and travel behavior: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Travel Research, 38(4),340-352.
[99] Sivanathan, N., & Pettit, N. C. (2010). Protecting the self through consumption: Status goods as affirmational commodities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3),564-570.
[100] Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1),46-64.
URLpmid: 17201570
[101] Su, L., Jiang, Y. W., Chen, Z. S., & DeWall, C. N. (2017). Social exclusion and consumer switching behavior: A control restoration mechanism. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1),99-117.
[102] Swann Jr, W. B., Rentfrow, P. J., & Guinn, J. S. (2003). Self-verification: The Search for Coherence. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tagney (Eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity (p. 367-383). The Guilford Press.
[103] Thomas, V. L., Saenger, C., & Bock, D. E. (2017). Do you want to talk about it? When word of mouth alleviates the psychological discomfort of self-threat. Psychology & Marketing, 34(9),894-903.
[104] Townsend, C., & Sood, S. (2012). Self-affirmation through the choice of highly aesthetic products. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2),415-428.
[105] Troisi, J. D., & Gabriel, S. (2011). Chicken soup really is good for the soul: “Comfort food” fulfills the need to belong. Psychological Science, 22(6),747-753.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611407931URLpmid: 21537054
[106] Wan, E. W., Xu, J., & Ding, Y. (2014). To be or not to be unique? The effect of social exclusion on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6),1109-1122.
[107] Wang, J., Zhu, R. J., & Shiv, B. (2012). The lonely consumer: Loner or conformer? Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6),1116-1128.
doi: 10.1086/661552URL
[108] Ward, M. K., & Dahl, D. W. (2014). Should the devil sell prada? retail rejection increases aspiring consumers' desire for the brand. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3),590-609.
[109] White, K., & Argo, J. J. (2009). Social identity threat and consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3),313-325.
[110] White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2006). To be or not be? the influence of dissociative reference groups on consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4),404-414.
[111] White, K., & Dahl, D. W. (2007). Are all out-groups created equal? Consumer identity and dissociative influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4),525-536.
[112] White, K., Stackhouse, M., & Argo, J. J. (2018). When social identity threat leads to the selection of identity-reinforcing options: The role of public self-awareness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 144,60-73.
[113] Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1981). Symbolic self-completion, attempted influence, and self-deprecation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2(2),89-114.
[114] Williams, K. D., & Nida, S. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2),71-75.
[115] Yoon, S., & Kim, H. C. (2018). Feeling economically stuck: The effect of perceived economic mobility and socioeconomic status on variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5),1141-1156.
[116] Zhao, T. Y., Song, W., Jin, X. T., Cui, H. J., & Li, Y. (2019). Hedonism or self-growth? The influence of perceived control on individual product preferences for individuals under self-threat. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(6),1343-1361.
[117] Zheng, X. Y., Baskin, E., & Peng, S. Q. (2018a). The spillover effect of incidental social comparison on materialistic pursuits: The mediating role of envy. European Journal of Marketing, 52(5-6),1107-1127.
[118] Zheng, X. Y., Baskin, E., & Peng, S. Q. (2018b). Feeling inferior, showing off: The effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption. Journal of Business Research, 90,196-205.
[119] Zhong, C. B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19(9),838-842.




[1]郑晓莹;彭泗清. 补偿性消费行为:概念、类型与心理机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(9): 1513-1520.
[2]顾佳旎;孟慧;范津砚. 社会自我效能感的结构、测量及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(11): 1791-1800.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5434
相关话题/社会 心理 管理 科学 系统

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 基于社交媒体数据的心理指标识别建模: 机器学习的方法
    苏悦1,2,刘明明1,3,赵楠1,刘晓倩1,朱廷劭1,2()1中国科学院心理研究所,北京1001012中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000493联想研究院,北京100094收稿日期:2020-01-14出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22基金资助:国家社科基金重点项目(17A ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人际互动中社会学习的计算神经机制
    黎穗卿,陈新玲,翟瑜竹,张怡洁,章植鑫,封春亮()教育部脑认知与教育科学重点实验室(华南师范大学);华南师范大学心理学院;华南师范大学心理应用研究中心;华南师范大学广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室,广州510631收稿日期:2020-08-10出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 让智慧插上创造的翅膀:创造动力系统的激活及其条件
    张亚坤1,3,陈宁1,陈龙安2(),施建农1,4,5,6()1中国科学院心理研究所,北京1001012中华创造力训练发展协会,台北106833北京理工大学,北京1000814中国科学院大学,北京1000495中国科学院行为科学重点实验室,北京1001016DepartmentofLearningan ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于游戏的心理测评
    徐俊怡,李中权()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-05-24出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李中权E-mail:zqli@nju.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社科规划基金项目(20YJA190004);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 社会互动加工的认知特性及脑机制——第三人称的视角
    程羽慧,袁祥勇(),蒋毅中国科学院心理研究所,脑与认知科学国家重点实验室,脑科学与智能技术卓越创新中心,北京100101;中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049;北京脑科学与类脑研究中心,北京102206收稿日期:2020-05-14出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 恐惧管理理论的争议及其对死亡心理研究的启示
    孟祥寒1,李强1,2(),周彦榜1,王进31南开大学社会心理学系,天津3003502南开大学滨海学院,天津3002703天津职业技术师范大学,天津300222收稿日期:2020-02-29出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李强E-mail:liqiangp@126 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 亲社会行为中的从众效应
    魏真瑜1(),邓湘树1,赵治瀛21西南财经大学社会发展研究院,成都6111302耶鲁大学医学院,美国收稿日期:2020-03-31出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:魏真瑜E-mail:weizhenyu@swufe.edu.cn基金资助:西南财经大学中央高校基本科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 敬畏的心理模型及其认知神经机制
    赵小红1,2,童薇3,陈桃林1,2(),吴冬梅4,张蕾1,2,陈正举1,方晓义3,龚启勇1,2,唐小蓉21四川大学华西医院放射科华西磁共振研究中心,成都6100412四川大学公共管理学院社会学与心理学系,成都6100653北京师范大学心理学部,北京1008754成都市第四人民医院,成都610036收 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析
    叶静,张戌凡()南京师范大学金陵女子学院,南京210097收稿日期:2020-07-23出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:张戌凡E-mail:xufanzhang@163.com基金资助:国家自然科学青年基金项目“工会实践对员工工作幸福感的影响:基于工具-情感的双 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 同胞冲突及其解决:家庭子系统的影响
    屈国梁,曹晓君()西华师范大学教育学院,四川南充637002收稿日期:2020-03-17出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:曹晓君E-mail:cxj841118@aliyun.comSiblingconflictanditsresolution:Theeffec ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01