删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

让智慧插上创造的翅膀:创造动力系统的激活及其条件

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

张亚坤1,3, 陈宁1, 陈龙安2(), 施建农1,4,5,6()
1中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101
2中华创造力训练发展协会, 台北 10683
3北京理工大学, 北京 100081
4中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
5中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 北京 100101
6Department of Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University, Denmark
收稿日期:2020-07-27出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22


基金资助:中国科学院“率先行动”计划特色研究所项目(TSS-2015-06)

Wisdom minds with creative wings: Igniting creative dynamics focusing on its interest cultivation

ZHANG Yakun1,3, CHEN Ning1, CHEN Lung An2(), SHI Jiannong1,4,5,6()
1Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
2China Creativity Training Development Association, Taipei 10462, China
3Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
4University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
5Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
6Department of Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University, Denmark
Received:2020-07-27Online:2021-04-15Published:2021-02-22







摘要/Abstract


摘要: 创造力是一个集个人、团体、社会、文化相互交织的系统, 因此创造力的培养也需要综合考虑。本文在融合以往创造力研究的基础上, 建构了一套系统创造力培养的“蝴蝶理论”, 创造力培养需要抓住核心来统领全局, 同时兼顾创造力培养所需要统筹兼顾的各个部分。动力系统的激活是创造力培养的核心。新颖、适用的创造性成果的产出, 需要社会文化中的个体或团体在创造性心理动力的基础上来完成。创造性心理动力有效的激活则需要一些基本条件, 如在认知层面, 需要具备一定的能力, 如一般认知能力、思维方法的掌握、元认知以及高效的资源整合能力等; 在非智力因素方面, 基本心理需要的满足, 个性心理的健康发展等是创造力得以发挥的必要条件, 推而广之还包括:合理的社会支持、互动以及文化的包容等等。除了理论方面的整合, 本文还从实践的角度分析如何激活学生的动力系统, 重点分析了什么是兴趣以及如何激发个体的兴趣, 因为以兴趣爱好为核心的内部动机是自主性最高的动力来源。本文从理论(创造力培养的蝴蝶理论)与实践(创造力培养的兴趣激发)两个角度为创造力培养提供了支持。



图1a为BSI模型(Bio-Social-Intelligence Model) (Shi et al. 2007; Shi et al. 2013); b为大脑的层级理论(Maclean, 1967, 1992)
图1a为BSI模型(Bio-Social-Intelligence Model) (Shi et al. 2007; Shi et al. 2013); b为大脑的层级理论(Maclean, 1967, 1992)



图2创造力培养的蝴蝶理论
图2创造力培养的蝴蝶理论



图3(a)创造力培养中的三大系统(施建农, 2006); (b)将闭环打开为开放的路径, 将动力系统作为创造力培养的中心环节
图3(a)创造力培养中的三大系统(施建农, 2006); (b)将闭环打开为开放的路径, 将动力系统作为创造力培养的中心环节



图4幽默的产生过程。图画取自(Carter, 2014) 注:资料为笔者根据相关资料的整理
图4幽默的产生过程。图画取自(Carter, 2014) 注:资料为笔者根据相关资料的整理



图5四向度幽默风格模型(Martin, 2007; Martin & Ford, 2018; Martin et al. 2003)
图5四向度幽默风格模型(Martin, 2007; Martin & Ford, 2018; Martin et al. 2003)



图6(a)为Csikszentmihalyi的福流理论; (b)为福流的动态发展的模型(Csikszentmihalyi, 2014a, 2014b)
图6(a)为Csikszentmihalyi的福流理论; (b)为福流的动态发展的模型(Csikszentmihalyi, 2014a, 2014b)







[1] Farmelo, G (2006). 天地有大美: 现代科学之伟大方程 (涂泓, 吴俊, 冯承天译) 上海: 上海科技教育出版社.
[2] Gazzaniga, M. S (2016). 人类的荣耀:是什么让我们独一无二 北京: 北京联合出版社.
[3] Huff, T. E (2010). 近代科学为什么诞生在西方 (周程, 余霞译. 第2版). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[4] Sawyer, R. K (2013). 创造性:人类创新的科学 (师保国译. 第二版). 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[5] Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2014). 游戏化思维: 改变未来商业的新力量 (周逵, 王晓丹译) 杭州: 浙江人民出版社.
[6] 白春章, 陈其荣, 张慧洁. (2012). 拔尖创新人才成长规律与培养模式研究述评. 教育研究, (12),147-151.
[7] 陈红敏, 莫雷. (2005). 幼儿科学创新人格的架构及其培养. 当代教育论坛, (2),83-85.
[8] 陈世民, 方杰, 孙配贞, 张进辅, 郑雪. (2012). 幽默的社会理论及其应用研究. 心理科学, 35(3),687-693.
[9] 陈煦海, 黄希庭. (2007). 幽默感研究述评. 西南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 33(2),20-24.
[10] 陈学志. (2004). 从“哈哈”到“啊哈”—统整知、情、意、行的幽默课程对创造力培养的影响. 教育心理学报, 35(4),393-411.
[11] 陈英和. (2013). 认知发展心理学. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[12] 韩茹, 施建农. (2005). 动物创造力和创新研究概述. 心理科学进展, 13(6),708-714.
[13] 黄韵, 成良, 屈弋力, 赵庆柏, 周治金. (2017). 动物创造创新:最简单的智慧闪光. 心理科学进展, 25(5),799-809.
[14] 蒋柯, 李其维. (2020). 论皮亚杰的方法论及其当代意义. 心理学报, 52(8),1017-1030.
[15] 李其维. (2008). “认知革命”与“第二代认知科学”刍议. 心理学报, 40(12),1306-1327.
[16] 林崇德. (2013). 教育与心理发展——教育为的是学生发展. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
[17] 林崇德, 胡卫平. (2012). 创造性人才的成长规律和培养模式. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1),36-42.
[18] 刘俊, 祝智庭. (2015). 游戏化——让乐趣促进学习成为教育技术的新追求. 电化教育研究, 36(10),69-91.
[19] 聂其阳, 罗劲. (2012). “啊哈!”和“哈哈!”: 顿悟与幽默的脑认知成分比较. 心理科学进展, 20(2),219-227.
[20] 尚俊杰. (2016). 游戏化创新设计思维.见张海霞 (编.) 创新工程实践, (pp.130-136). 北京: 高等教育出版社.
[21] 施建农. (1995). 创造性系统模型. 心理科学进展, 13(3),1-5.
[22] 施建农. (2006). 创造力的培养. 学习与研究, (6),57-60.
[23] 施建农, 陈宁, 杜翔云, 张兴利, 张真, 段小菊, 刘彤冉. (2012). 创造力心理学与杰出人才培养. 中国科学院院刊(增刊), 27(S1),164-173.
[24] 王瑞明, 陈红敏, 佟秀丽, 莫雷, Chen, Z(2007). 用微观发生法培养幼儿科学创造力的实验研究. 学前教育研究, (7-8),41-45.
[25] 韦钰. (2012). 十年“做中学”为了说明什么——以科学研究为基础的教学改革之路. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社.
[26] 温·哈伦. (2011). 科学教育的原则和大概念 (韦钰, 译.) 北京: 科学普及出版社.
[27] 吴国盛. (2016). 什么是科学. 广州: 广东人民出版社.
[28] 叶浩生. (2009). 心理学史. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
[29] 叶之红. (2007). 关于拔尖创新人才早期培养的基本认识. 教育研究, (6),36-42.
[30] 詹雨臻, 陈学志, 卓淑玲, Martin, R. A (2011). 区分良善与有害的幽默:中文版「幽默风格量表」的发展. 测验学刊(专刊), 58,207-234.
[31] 张光明, 罗传芳. (2010). 马克思传. 北京: 人民日报出版社.
[32] 张亚坤, 陈龙安, 张兴利, 施建农. (2018). 融合视角下的西方创造力系统观. 心理科学进展, 26(5),810-830.
[33] 周冶金, 谷传华. (2015). 创造心理学. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.
[34] Alfonso-Benlliure, V., Meléndez, J. C., & García-Ballesteros, M. (2013). Evaluation of a creativity intervention program for preschoolers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10,112-120.
[35] Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the "social psychology of creativity". Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
[36] Baas, M., Roskes, M., Sligte, D., Nijstad, B. A., & de Dreu, C. K. W., (2013). Personality and creativity: The dual pathway to creativity model and a research agenda. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(10),732-748.
[37] Bartolo, A., Benuzzi, F., Nocetti, L., Baraldi, P., & Nichelli, P. (2006). Humor comprehension and appreciation: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11),1789-1798.
URLpmid: 17069470
[38] Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Benedek, M., Chen, Q. L., ... Silvia, P. J. (2018). Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(5),1087-1092.
[39] Beaussart, M. L., White, A. E., Pullaro, A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Reviewing recent empirical findings on creativity and mental illness. In J. C. Kaufman (Ed.), Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[40] Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2015). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
[41] Bonnin, L. (2012). Super smart animals. Retrieved July 7, 2020,from . https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2255259/.
[42] Canal, P., Bischetti, L., Di Paola, S., Bertini, C., Ricci, I., & Bambini, V. (2019). 'Honey, shall I change the baby? - Well done, choose another one': ERP and time-frequency correlates of humor processing. Brain and Cognition, 132,41-55.
URLpmid: 30870685
[43] Carson, S. H. (2011). Creativity and psychopathology: A shared vulnerability model. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(3),144-153.
URLpmid: 21443821
[44] Carson, S. H. (2014a). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp.198-221). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
[45] Carson, S. H. (2014b). The shared vulnerability model of creativity and psychopathology. In J. C. Kaufman (Ed.), Creativity and mental illness (pp.253-280). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[46] Carter, R. (2014). The brain book: An illustrated guide to its structure, functions, and disorders (2nd ed.) New York: DK Publishing.
[47] Celik, P., & Lubart, T. (2016). When East Meets West. In V. P. Gl?veanu & B. Wagoner (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of creativity and culture research (pp.37-55). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
[48] Chan, Y. C., Chou, T. L., Chen, H. C., Yeh, Y. C., Lavallee, J. P., Liang, K. C., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Towards a neural circuit model of verbal humor processing: An fMRI study of the neural substrates of incongruity detection and resolution. Neuroimage, 66,169-176.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.019URLpmid: 23103517
[49] Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5),537-550.
[50] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014a). Flow and education. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.),. Applications of flow in human development and education: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp.129-151). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
[51] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014b). Learning, "flow", and happiness. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.). Applications of flow in human development and education:The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp.153-171). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
[52] Dai, D. Y. (2013). How advances in gifted education contribute to innovation education, and vice versa. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.). International handbook on innovation education (pp.52-67). New York: Routledge.
[53] Dreu, C.K. W. D., & Nijstad, B. A. (2017). On becoming creative: Basic theory with implications for the workplace. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp.353-369). New York: The Guilford Press.
[54] Fayena-Tawil, F., Kozbelt, A., & Sitaras, L. (2011). Think global, act local: A protocol analysis comparison of artists' and nonartists' cognitions, metacognitions, and evaluations while drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2),135-145.
[55] Gazzaniga, M. S. (2008). Human: The science behind what makes us unique. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
[56] Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2013). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind. New York:: W. W. Norton & Company
[57] Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. Y. (2013). Competence and pay for performance. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp.232-250). New York: The Guilford Press.
[58] Hamann, S. B., Ely, T. D., Hoffman, J. M., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). Ecstasy and agony: Activation of the human amygdala in positive and negative emotion. Psychological Science, 13(2),135-141.
URLpmid: 11933997
[59] Hennessey, B. A. (2007). Creativity and motivation in the classroom: A social psychological and multi-cultural perspective. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp.27-46). Singapore: World Scientific.
[60] Hennessey, B. A. (2010). Intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom:Have we come full circle? In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp.329-361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[61] Hsee, C. K., & Ruan, B. (2016). The pandora effect: The power and peril of curiosity. Psychological Science, 27(5),659-666.
[62] Jaarsveld, S., & van Leeuwen, C. (2005). Sketches from a design process: creative cognition inferred from intermediate products. Cognitive Science, 29(1),79-101.
URLpmid: 21702768
[63] Kaufman, A. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Explorations in creativity research: Animal creativity and innovation. London: Elsevier.
[64] Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35(3),155-165.
[65] Kim, U. (2007). Creating a world of possibilities: Indigenous and cultural perspectives. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp.xi-xvi). Singapore: World Scientific.
[66] Lee, G. P., Meador, K. J., Loring, D. W., Allison, J. D., Brown, W. S., Paul, L. K., ... Lavin, T. B. (2004). Neural substrates of emotion as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Behavioral Neurology, 17(1),9-17.
URLpmid: 15209221
[67] Lubart, T. (2010). Cross-cultural perspectives on creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp.265-278). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[68] Maclean, P. D. (1967). The brain in relation to empathy and medical education. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 144(5),374-382.
[69] Maclean, P. D. ( In, R. E. Hanlon (1991). Neofrontocerebellar evolution in regard to computation and prediction:Some fractal aspects of microgenesis (Ed.), Cognitive microgenesis: A neuropsychological perspective (pp.3-31). New York: Springer-Verlag.
[70] Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
[71] Martin, R. A., & Ford, T. E. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach (2nd ed.) London: Elsevier Academic Press.
[72] Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1),48-75.
[73] Milton, J., Solodkin, A., Hlu?tík, P., & Small, S. L. (2007). The mind of expert motor performance is cool and focused. Neuroimage, 35(2),804-813.
[74] Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
[75] Piirto, J. (2010). The five core attitudes, seven I's, and general concepts of the creative process. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp.142-171). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[76] Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills: How to embed creativity into the curriculum, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
[77] Plucker, J. A., & Dow, G. T. (2010). Attitude change as the precursor to creativity enhancement. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp.362-379). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[78] Richards, R. (2010). Everyday creativity in the classroom:A trip through time with seven suggestions. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp.206-234). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[79] Richards, R. (2018). Everyday creativity and the healthy mind: Dynamic new paths for self and society, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
[80] Runco, M. A. (2010). Education based on a parsimonious theory of creativity. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp.235-251). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[81] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1),54-67.
doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020URLpmid: 10620381
[82] Ryan, R. M., & Moller, A. C. (2000). Competence as central, but not sufficient, for high-quality motivation:A self-determination theory perspective. Handbook of competence and motivation:Theory and application (2nd ed. , pp.214-231). New York: The Guilford Press.
[83] Sage, H. (2012). Horizon: The hunt for AI. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01fmbvb.
[84] Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity:The science of human innovation (2nd ed.) New York: Oxford University Press.
[85] Shi, J. N. (2013). Broadening creativity:From testing to systemic understanding. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity talent and excellence (pp.xi-xv). Singapore: Springer.
[86] Shi, J. N., Qu, X. J., & Liu, T. R. (2007). Creativity and its cultivation. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp.65-75). Singapore: World Scientific.
[87] Shi, J. N., Zhang, X. L., Chen, N., Duan, X. J., & Du, X. Y. (2013). Nurturing gifted learners in Mainland China: A bio-socio-intellectual perspective. CAISE Review, 1,2-14.
[88] Simonton, D. K. (2014). The mad (creative) genius:what do we know after a century of historiometric research? In J. C. Kaufman (Ed.), Creativity and mental illness (pp.25-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[89] Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Creativity as a habit. In A. G. Tan (Ed.), Creativity: A handbook for teachers (pp.3-26). Singapore: World Scientific.
[90] Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Teaching for creativity. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp.394-414). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[91] Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2012). Conceptions of creativity and relations with judges' intelligence and personality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(2),138-149.
[92] Suls, J. M. (1972). Two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons Information-processing analsis. In J. H. Goldstein & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor (pp.81-100). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[93] Suls, J. M. (1977). Cognitive and disparagement theories of humour:A theoretical and empirical synthesis. In A. J. Chapman & H. C. Foot (Eds.), It's a funny thing, humor(pp.41-45). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.
[94] Vrabel, J. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Shango, R. G. (2017). Spitefulness and humor styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 105,238-243.
[95] Wallner, E. (2018). Turning design mockups into code with deep learning. Deep Learning.Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://blog.floydhub.com/turning-design-mockups-into-code-with-deep-learning/.
[96] Wyer, R. S., & Collins, J. E. (1992). A theory of humor elicitation. Psychological Review, 99(4),663-688.
URLpmid: 1454903
[97] Xiong, W., Droppo, J., Huang, X., Seide, F., Seltzer, M., Stolcke, A., ... Zweig, G. (2017). The microsoft 2016 conversational speech recognition system. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP),5255-5259.
[98] Xiong, W., Wu, L., Alleva, F., Droppo, J., Huang, X., & Stolcke, A. (2017). The microsoft 2017 conversational speech recognition system. Microsoft Technical Report.
[99] Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studing and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2-3),73-86.




[1]白利刚. Holland职业兴趣理论的简介及评述[J]. 心理科学进展, 1996, 4(2): 27-31.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5413
相关话题/创造力 培养 科学 心理 北京

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 基于游戏的心理测评
    徐俊怡,李中权()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-05-24出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李中权E-mail:zqli@nju.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社科规划基金项目(20YJA190004);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 恐惧管理理论的争议及其对死亡心理研究的启示
    孟祥寒1,李强1,2(),周彦榜1,王进31南开大学社会心理学系,天津3003502南开大学滨海学院,天津3002703天津职业技术师范大学,天津300222收稿日期:2020-02-29出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李强E-mail:liqiangp@126 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 敬畏的心理模型及其认知神经机制
    赵小红1,2,童薇3,陈桃林1,2(),吴冬梅4,张蕾1,2,陈正举1,方晓义3,龚启勇1,2,唐小蓉21四川大学华西医院放射科华西磁共振研究中心,成都6100412四川大学公共管理学院社会学与心理学系,成都6100653北京师范大学心理学部,北京1008754成都市第四人民医院,成都610036收 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析
    叶静,张戌凡()南京师范大学金陵女子学院,南京210097收稿日期:2020-07-23出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:张戌凡E-mail:xufanzhang@163.com基金资助:国家自然科学青年基金项目“工会实践对员工工作幸福感的影响:基于工具-情感的双 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 道德情绪:探寻道德与创造力关系的新视角
    王博韬(),魏萍()西安电子科技大学心理健康教育中心,西安710126收稿日期:2020-03-18出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:王博韬,魏萍E-mail:527516769@qq.com;pwei@xidian.edu.cn基金资助:国家社科基金青年项目(1 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 催产素调控心理韧性:基于对海马的作用机制
    薛冰,王雪娇,马宁,高军()认知与人格教育部重点实验室,重庆400715收稿日期:2020-04-27出版日期:2021-02-15发布日期:2020-12-29通讯作者:高军E-mail:gaojunscience@126.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金(32071059);重庆市自然科学基金( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 计算模型视角下信任形成的心理和神经机制——基于信任博弈中投资者的角度
    高青林,周媛()中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京100101中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2020-04-18出版日期:2021-01-15发布日期:2020-11-23通讯作者:周媛E-mail:zhouyuan@psych.ac.cn基金资助:*中国科学院心理研究 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 《心理科学进展》2020年度审稿专家名录
    出版日期:2021-01-15发布日期:2021-01-08Online:2021-01-15Published:2021-01-08摘要/Abstract参考文献相关文章0Norelatedarticlesfound!PDF全文下载地址:http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlk ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 《心理科学进展》2020年度审稿专家名录
    出版日期:2021-01-15发布日期:2021-01-08Online:2021-01-15Published:2021-01-08摘要/Abstract参考文献相关文章0Norelatedarticlesfound!PDF全文下载地址:http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlk ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 独立、协同和平衡视角下的单维式基本心理需要满足
    陈晨,刘玉新(),赵晨对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京100029收稿日期:2019-12-05出版日期:2020-12-15发布日期:2020-10-26通讯作者:刘玉新E-mail:liuyuxin@uibe.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(72074024);国家自然科学基金项目( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01