删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

测谎者的无意识加工对谎言识别的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

梅宏玉, 吴嵩
深圳大学心理与社会学院, 深圳 518000
收稿日期:2017-11-02出版日期:2018-11-15发布日期:2018-09-26


基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金青年项目资助(31700979)

The influence of detectors’ unconscious process on deception detection

MEI Hongyu, WU Song
College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518000, China
Received:2017-11-02Online:2018-11-15Published:2018-09-26







摘要/Abstract


摘要: 在谎言识别研究中, 最重要的发现之一就是人们在意识层面上识别谎言的正确率仅仅略高于随机水平。于是, 大量的研究转而考察无意识加工对谎言识别的影响。本文从测谎者的角度出发, 考察测谎者的无意识加工是否可以提高其谎言识别的正确率。本文梳理了关于无意识谎言识别的理论建构, 总结了无意识谎言识别的实证研究, 从无意识的信息接收、信息接收后的无意识思维以及无意识判断决策三个方面详细介绍了近年来的重要的成果和主要的争议。针对目前研究的困境, 本文提出未来的研究应该重点关注理论建构、交互式谎言情境、线索加工匹配效应、测试生理和脑激活指标以及无意识谎言识别的应用等五个方面。


[1] 郭秀艳 . ( 2002). 再认中意识和无意识的贡献大小——兼论内隐记忆的抗老化现象. 心理科学, 25( 5), 535-537.
[2] 郭晓娟, 苏彦捷 . ( 2000). 心理生理测谎技术的研究与应用. 心理科学, 23( 6), 752-753.
[3] 李建升, 王丹, 沈模卫 . ( 2016). 无意识思维:理论、质疑与回应. 心理科学, 39( 2), 318-323.
[4] 梁静, 李开云, 曲方炳, 陈宥辛, 颜文靖, 傅小兰 . ( 2014). 说谎的非言语视觉线索. 心理科学进展, 22( 6), 995-1005.
[5] 申寻兵, 隋华杰, 傅小兰 . ( 2017). 微表情在欺骗检测中的应用. 心理科学进展, 25( 2), 211-220.
[6] 吴嵩, 蔡頠, 孙嘉卿, 章哲明, 金盛华 . ( 2012). 谎言判断的双加工理论. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20( 6), 785-788.
[7] 吴嵩, 金盛华, 蔡頠, 李绍颛 . ( 2012). 基于语言内容的谎言识别. 心理科学进展, 20( 3), 457-466
[8] 张亭玉, 张雨青 . ( 2008). 说谎行为及其识别的心理学研究. 心理科学进展, 16( 4), 651-660.
[9] Aamondt, M.G., & Custer, H.( 2006). Who can best catch a liar?: A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. The Forensic Examiner, 15( 1), 6-11.
[10] Albrechtsen, J. S., Meissner, C. A., & Susa, K. J. ( 2009). Can intuition improve deception detection performance? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45( 4), 1052-1055.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.017URL
[11] Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. ( 2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10( 3), 214-234.
doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2URL
[12] Bond, C. F., Jr., & DePaulo, B. M. ( 2008). Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias. Psychological Bulletin, 134( 4), 477-492.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477URL
[13] Buller, D.B., & Burgoon, J.K . ( 1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6( 3), 203-242.
doi: 10.1111/comt.1996.6.issue-3URL
[14] Buss, D.M. (Ed) ( 2008). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Omegatype Typography.
[15] Byrne, R.W., & Corp, N.( 2004). Neocortex size predicts deception rate in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271( 1549), 1693-1699.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2780URL
[16] DePaulo, B.M., & Kashy, D.A . ( 1998). Everyday lies in close and casual relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74( 1), 63-79.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.63URL
[17] DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. ( 2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129( 1), 74-118.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74URL
[18] DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L . ( 2004). Discerning lies from truths:behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition.In P. Granhag & L. Str?mwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
[19] DePaulo, B. M., Rosenthal, R., Green, C. R., & Rosenkrantz, J. ( 1982). Diagnosing deceptive and mixed messages from verbal and nonverbal cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18( 5), 433-446.
doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90064-6URL
[20] Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B.( 2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311( 5763), 1005-1007.
doi: 10.1126/science.1121629URL
[21] Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L.F. ( 2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1( 2), 95-109.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.xURL
[22] Ekman, P.( 1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York, WW-NORTON & COMPANY.
[23] Feeley, T.H., & Young, M.J . ( 2000). Self‐reported cues about deceptive and truthful communication: The effects of cognitive capacity and communicator veracity. Communication Quarterly, 48( 2), 101-119.
doi: 10.1080/01463370009385585URL
[24] Forrest, J.A., & Feldman, R.S . ( 2000). Detecting deception and judge's involvement: Lower task involvement leads to better lie detection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26( 1), 118-125.
doi: 10.1177/0146167200261011URL
[25] Franz, V. H., & von Luxburg, U.( 2015). No evidence for unconscious lie detection: A significant difference does not imply accurate classification. Psychological Science, 26( 10), 1646-1648.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615597333URL
[26] Ham, J., van den Bos, K., & van Doorn, E. A.( 2009). Lady justice thinks unconsciously: unconscious thought can lead to more accurate justice judgments. Social Cognition, 27( 4), 509-521.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.509URL
[27] Handley, I.M., & Runnion, B.M . ( 2011). Evidence that unconscious thinking influences persuasion based on argument quality. Social Cognition, 29( 6), 668-682.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.668URL
[28] Hartwig, M., & Bond, C. F., Jr. ( 2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137( 4), 643-659.
doi: 10.1037/a0023589URL
[29] Levine, T. R., & Bond, C. F., Jr. ( 2014). Direct and indirect measures of lie detection tell the same story: A reply to ten Brinke, Stimson, and Carney (2014). Psychological Science, 25( 10), 1960-1961.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614536740URL
[30] Li, J., Gao, Q., Zhou, J., Li, X., Zhang, M., & Shen, M. ( 2014). Bias or equality? Unconscious thought equally integrates temporally scattered information. Consciousness and Cognition, 25, 77-87.
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.01.012URL
[31] Masip, J., Alonso, H., Herrero, C., & Garrido, E. ( 2016). Experienced and novice officers’ generalized communication suspicion and veracity judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 40( 2), 169-181.
doi: 10.1037/lhb0000169URLpmid: 26844912
[32] Messner, C., W?enke, M., & Weibel, C. ( 2011). Unconscious personnel selection. Social Cognition, 29( 6), 699-710.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.699URL
[33] Moi, W.Y., & Shanks, D.R . ( 2015). Can lies be detected unconsciously? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1221.
[34] Nieuwenstein, M. R., Wierenga, T., Morey, R. D., Wicherts, J. M., Blom, T. N., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & van Rijn, H. ( 2015). On making the right choice: A meta-analysis and large-scale replication attempt of the unconscious thought advantage. Judgment and Decision Making, 10( 1), 1-17.
[35] Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., & Ferrara, M. ( 2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69( 2), 144-157.
doi: 10.1080/714041710URL
[36] Porter, S., McCabe, S., Woodworth, M., & Peace, K. A. ( 2007). Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration … or is it? An investigation of the impact of motivation and feedback on deception detection. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12( 2), 297-309.
doi: 10.1348/135532506X143958URL
[37] Reinhard, M.-A.( 2010). Need for Cognition and the process of lie detection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 6), 961-971.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.002URL
[38] Reinhard, M.-A., Greifeneder, R., & Scharmach, M. ( 2013). Unconscious processes improve lie detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105( 5), 721-739.
doi: 10.1037/a0034352URLpmid: 24219784
[39] Reinhard, M.-A., & Sporer, S.L. ( 2008). Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: The impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44( 3), 477-488.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.012URL
[40] Street, C. N.H., & Kingstone, A.( 2017). Aligning spinoza with descartes: an informed cartesian account of the truth bias. British Journal of Psychology, 108( 3), 453-466.
doi: 10.1111/bjop.12210URLpmid: 27511287
[41] Street, C. N.H., & Masip, J.( 2015). The source of the truth bias: Heuristic processing? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56( 3), 254-263.
doi: 10.1111/sjop.12204URLpmid: 25707774
[42] Street, C. N.H., & Vadillo, M.A . ( 2016). Can the unconscious boost lie-detection accuracy? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25( 4), 246-250.
doi: 10.1177/0963721416656348URL
[43] Strick, M., Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Sjoerdsma, A., van Baaren, R. B., & Nordgren, L. F. ( 2011). A meta-analysis on unconscious thought effects. Social Cognition, 29( 6), 738-762.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.738URL
[44] ten Brinke, L., Stimson, D., & Carney, D. R. ( 2014). Some evidence for unconscious lie detection. Psychological Science, 25( 5), 1098-1105.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614524421URLpmid: 24659190
[45] ten Brinke, L., Vohs, K. D., & Carney, D. R. ( 2016). Can ordinary people detect deception after all? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20( 8), 579-588.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.012URL
[46] van't Veer, A. E., Gallucci, M., Stel, M., & van Beest, I. ( 2015). Unconscious deception detection measured by finger skin temperature and indirect veracity judgments- results of a registered report. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 672.
[47] Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. ( 2015). A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta-analysis. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22( 1), 1-21.
[48] Vrij, A., & Granhag, P.A. ( 2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1( 2), 110-117.
doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.004URL
[49] Weiss, B., & Feldman, R.S. ( 2006). Looking good and lying to do it: Deception as an impression management strategy in job interviews. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36( 4), 1070-1086.
doi: 10.1111/jasp.2006.36.issue-4URL
[50] Wheeler, B.C. ( 2010). Decrease in alarm call response among tufted capuchins in competitive feeding contexts: Possible evidence for counterdeception. International Journal of Primatology, 31( 4), 665-675.
doi: 10.1007/s10764-010-9419-1URL
[51] Wu, S., Cai, W., & Jin, S. ( 2015). Motivation enhances the ability to detect truth from deception in audio-only messages. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 12( 2), 119-126.
doi: 10.1002/jip.v12.2URL
[52] Wu, S., Cai, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., & Jin, S.(in press). Impact of adult attachment anxiety on deception judgments: Examining the moderating effect of motivation.Psychological Reports, 121( 2), 253-264.
[53] Yang, H., Chattopadhyay, A., Zhang, K., & Dahl, D. W. ( 2012). Unconscious creativity: When can unconscious thought outperform conscious thought? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22( 4), 573-581.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.002URL
[54] Zhong, C.-B., Dijksterhuis, A., & Galinsky, A. D. ( 2008). The merits of unconscious thought in creativity. Psychological Science, 19( 9), 912-918.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02176.xURLpmid: 18947357




[1]徐科朋, 杨凌倩, 吴家虹, 薛宏, 张姝玥. CNI模型在道德决策研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2102-2113.
[2]李斌, 卫海英, 李爱梅, 李方君, 陈晓曦. 体验性消费与实物性消费的双加工理论模型: 现象、机制及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 761-769.
[3]袁杰, 胡晓晴, 傅世敏. 无意识种族信息知觉加工[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 42-42.
[4]贾磊;祝书荣;张常洁;张庆林. 外显与内隐刻板印象的分布式表征及其激活过程——基于认知神经科学视角的探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(10): 1519-1533.
[5]赵广平;郭秀艳. 熟悉性与回想分离的新证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(7): 1122-1128.
[6]刘程浩;徐富明;史燕伟;李燕;张慧. 判断与决策中的基线比例忽略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(10): 1637-1646.
[7]罗俊龙;张恩涛;岳彩镇;唐晓晨;钟俊;张庆林. 基于双加工理论解释下信念偏差效应的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(5): 800-807.
[8]沈汪兵;刘昌. 道德伪善的心理学研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(5): 745-756.
[9]翟坤;张志杰. 表征动量的理论模型述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(4): 528-536.
[10]喻丰;彭凯平;韩婷婷;柴方圆;柏阳. 道德困境之困境—— 情与理的辩争[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(11): 1702-1712.
[11]尹华站;李祚山;李丹;黄希庭. 时距加工“长度效应”研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(6): 887-891.
[12]肖前国;罗乐;余林. 推理与决策的双加工理论研究简评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(2): 321-324.
[13]王瑞明,莫雷,闫秀梅. 文本阅读研究的技术模型和新观点[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(3): 346-353.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4509
相关话题/心理 科学 信息 技术 神经

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 个人主义上升, 集体主义式微?——全球文化变迁与民众心理变化
    黄梓航1,2,3,敬一鸣1,2,3,喻丰4,古若雷1,2,3,周欣悦5,张建新3,6,蔡华俭1,2,3()1中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京1001013中国科学院大学,北京1000494西安交通大学人文社会科学学院,西安71 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 自尊稳定性的认知神经机制
    王轶楠()心理学国家级实验教学示范中心(北京师范大学),北京100875收稿日期:2018-01-24出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27通讯作者:王轶楠E-mail:yynnwang@gmail.com基金资助:*国家自然科学基金青年项目(31700978)Neuralme ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 主动控制感的测量及认知神经机制
    张淼1,2,吴迪1,2,李明3,凌懿白1,2,张明4,5,赵科1,4()1中国科学院心理研究所,脑与认知科学国家重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000493吉首大学,湖南吉首4160004中国科学院心理研究所心理健康重点实验室,北京1001015大连医科大学心理学系,大连 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 积极心理干预是“新瓶装旧酒”吗?
    段文杰1(),卜禾21武汉大学社会学系,武汉4300002香港城市大学应用社会科学系,香港收稿日期:2017-12-25出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27通讯作者:段文杰E-mail:duan.w@whu.edu.cn基金资助:*武汉大学人文社会科学青年****学术发展计划 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 远离“诱惑”:预先承诺对跨期决策的调控机制及其神经基础
    利振华1,窦凯1,2(),聂衍刚1,2()1广州大学教育学院2广州大学广州人心理与行为研究中心,广州510006收稿日期:2018-02-05出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27通讯作者:窦凯,聂衍刚E-mail:psydk@gzhu.edu.cn;nie-yangang@g ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 为他人做决策:多维度心理机制与决策体验
    陆静怡*(),尚雪松华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062收稿日期:2017-12-24出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:陆静怡E-mail:jylu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71771088);上海市教育发展基金会和上 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于知觉的恐惧泛化的认知神经机制
    雷怡1,2,3(),梅颖1,2,3,张文海4,李红1,2,31深圳大学心理与社会学院2深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室3深圳市神经科学研究院,深圳5180004江苏省盐城工学院心理健康教育中心,盐城224003收稿日期:2017-02-23出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-0 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 啮齿动物主动母性行为动态改变的神经机制
    张一帆1,齐星亮2,蔡厚德1,2()1南京师范大学心理学院,南京2100972南京晓庄学院幼儿师范学院,南京211171收稿日期:2017-06-06出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:蔡厚德E-mail:caihoude@163.com基金资助:国家社科基金教育学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01