陈向荣1,
周福才1,,,
吴晓霞2,
赵明1,
陈学好1
1.扬州大学园艺与植物保护学院 扬州 225009
2.扬州大学生物科学与技术学院 扬州 225009
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目2018YFD000702
江苏省自主创新资金CX(20)3165
江苏省现代农业产业技术体系瓜菜创新团队JATS[2019]454
详细信息
作者简介:韩杜斌, 主要从事烟粉虱绿色防控研究。E-mail: 1242148990@qq.com
通讯作者:周福才, 主要从事蔬菜害虫绿色防控研究。E-mail: fczhou@yzu.edu.cn
中图分类号:S433.3计量
文章访问数:123
HTML全文浏览量:27
PDF下载量:114
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2020-09-08
录用日期:2020-12-04
刊出日期:2021-05-01
Control effects of blue and yellow light on Bemisia tabaci on greenhouse cucumbers
HAN Dubin1,,CHEN Xiangrong1,
ZHOU Fucai1,,,
WU Xiaoxia2,
ZHAO Ming1,
CHEN Xuehao1
1. College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2. College of Biological Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
Funds: the National Key R & D Plan of China2018YFD000702
the Independent Innovation Fund of Jiangsu ProvinceCX(20)3165
the Melon and Vegetable Innovation Team of Jiangsu Province Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology SystemJATS[2019]454
More Information
Corresponding author:ZHOU Fucai, E-mail: fczhou@yzu.edu.cn
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:烟粉虱是黄瓜的主要害虫,利用非化学措施控制烟粉虱对于黄瓜绿色生产具有重要意义。为探讨光驱避对设施蔬菜烟粉虱的控制作用,应用RGB值与虚拟波长的关系在计算机上模拟不同波长的颜色,根据烟粉虱对不同光质的选择率,筛选出对烟粉虱有驱避作用的敏感光质,在此基础上,调查该光质处理下设施黄瓜烟粉虱种群的变化情况以及该光质与多种光质联合使用对烟粉虱的控制作用。结果表明,RGB值为0,0,255(波长为470 nm的蓝色)的颜色对烟粉虱成虫的驱避率最高。黄色和绿色对烟粉虱有较强的诱集作用,烟粉虱的选择率分别为54%和42%;但在黄光和绿光打开的环境中再加入蓝光后,烟粉虱对黄光和绿光的选择率分别提高到68%和56%。在黄光和绿光共存的环境中加入蓝色光,可以加速烟粉虱从绿色区域向黄色区域的迁移。在大棚黄瓜田,蓝光照射后烟粉虱的种群数量迅速下降,并且随着光照射时间的延长,黄瓜上烟粉虱数量下降幅度增大,光照射6 d后烟粉虱的校正虫口减退率达92.76%。蓝光和黄光联合使用,在开启蓝光前先打开黄光,可以增强对黄瓜烟粉虱种群的控制作用,处理10 d、20 d、30 d后,黄瓜叶片上烟粉虱校正虫口减退率较不开黄光分别提高13.80%、18.17%、15.10%。研究发现,蓝光照射对烟粉虱有强烈的驱避作用,蓝光和黄光配合使用可以提高对烟粉虱的控制作用。
关键词:蓝光/
黄瓜/
烟粉虱/
绿色防控/
驱避
Abstract:Bemisia tabaci is the main pest of cucumbers; it is critical to control B. tabaci using non-chemical measures for green cucumber cultivation. To explore the control effects of light on B. tabaci in greenhouse vegetables, the relationship between RGB values and the virtual wavelength was used to simulate the colors of different wavelengths on a computer. The light colors repelling B. tabaci were selected according to the selection rate of B. tabaci to different light. On this basis, the changes in the population of B. tabaci on cucumbers treated with the selected light were investigated for the control effects of B. tabaci. The results showed that the color with RGB values of 0, 0, and 255 (wavelength of 470 nm; blue) had the highest repellent rate to B. tabaci. Yellow light (54%) and green light (42%) had a strong trapping effect on B. tabaci. Adding blue light to the environment with yellow and green light could improve the selection of yellow light (68%) and green light (56%). Blue light accelerated the migration of B. tabaci from green to yellow areas. In the greenhouse cucumber field, the population of B. tabaci decreased rapidly after blue light irradiation, and the number of B. tabaci on the cucumber plants decreased significantly with increased light exposure (P < 0.05); a corrected population decline rate of 92.76% was noted after 6 days of blue light irradiation. After 10, 20, and 30 days of treatment, the corrected population reduction rates of B. tabaci on the cucumber leaves increased by 13.80%, 18.17%, and 15.10%, respectively, compared to those without yellow light. These results show that blue light has a strong repellent effect on B. tabaci, and the combination of blue and yellow light improves the control effect. Thus, adding a yellow plate may significantly increase the trapping rates of B. tabaci.
Key words:Blue light/
Cucumber/
Bemisia tabaci/
Green prevention and control/
Repellent
HTML全文
图1绿光-黄光-蓝光联用对黄瓜烟粉虱选择行为的影响
G: 绿光; Y: 黄光; B: 蓝光。
Figure1.Effects of green-yellow-blue light combination on selection behavior of Bemisia tabaci
G: green light; Y: yellow light; B: blue light.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图2蓝光对大棚黄瓜烟粉虱数量的影响
B: 蓝光; CK: 不使用蓝光对照。
Figure2.Effect of blue light on Bemisia tabaci population of cucumber in greenhouse
B: blue light; CK: no-blue light.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
表1烟粉虱对不同光质的选择性
Table1.Selectivity of Bemisia tabaci to different light quality
x | 烟粉虱对不同红绿蓝选择数量(头) Selection number (head) of Bemisia tabaci to different RGB | |||||
… | 0, 0, x | 0, 51, x | 0, 102, x | 0, 153, x | … | |
0 | … | 4.33±1.52b | 6.33±0.57bc | 5.33±1.53bc | 4.67±0.58b | … |
51 | … | 6.00±3.60b | 2.67±0.57c | 7.33±1.53bc | 8.00±2.00ab | … |
102 | … | 6.33±3.21b | 10.67±4.51a | 8.67±2.52b | 7.00±3.61ab | … |
153 | … | 4.67±1.15b | 6.33±0.58bc | 5.67±3.05bc | 5.33±2.08b | … |
204 | … | 4.00±1.00b | 7.33±0.58bc | 5.00±1.00bc | 4.33±1.53b | … |
255 | … | 2.67±2.08b | 4.00±1.00c | 3.67±0.58c | 10.00±2.65a | … |
未选择Not selected | … | 22.00±3.61a | 12.67±4.62a | 14.33±2.52a | 10.67±0.58a | … |
x表示计算机三基色红绿蓝中变量的数值。“$ \cdots $”表示在其他光质下烟粉虱的选择情况, 但由于数据量偏大, 且未能体现出烟粉虱的驱避作用, 故用“$ \cdots $”省略表示。同列数据后不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。“x” represents the value of a variable in the computer’s three primary colors RGB (red, green and blue). “$ \cdots $” means the omited value due to large amount and failure to reflect the repellent effect of B. tabaci. In the same column, different lowercase letters show significant difference at P < 0.05 level. |
下载: 导出CSV
表2烟粉虱对不同蓝光的选择性
Table2.Selectivity of Bemisia tabaci to different blue light
x | 烟粉虱对不同红绿蓝选择数量(头) Selection number (head) of Bemisia tabaci to different RGB | |||||
0, 0, x | 11, 0, x | 22, 0, x | 33, 0, x | 44, 0, x | … | |
200 | 0.33±0.33d | 0.00±0.00c | 1.00±0.58de | 2.33±0.33bc | 2.67±0.33b | … |
211 | 0.67±0.33d | 1.00±0.58c | 3.67±1.20c | 2.00±0.58bc | 3.33±0.33b | … |
222 | 17.00±0.57a | 20.00±2.08a | 13.67±0.88a | 9.33±1.45a | 7.67±0.88a | … |
233 | 2.00±0.00c | 1.33±0.88c | 2.33±0.33cd | 4.00±0.58b | 3.33±0.67b | … |
244 | 0.33±0.33d | 0.33±0.33c | 2.33±0.33cd | 2.33±0.33bc | 3.00±0.58b | … |
255 | 0.00±0.00d | 0.33±0.33c | 0.00±0.00e | 1.00±0.58c | 2.33±0.33b | … |
未选择Not selected | 9.67±0.33b | 7.00±1.00b | 7.00±0.58b | 9.00±1.00a | 7.67±0.88a | … |
x表示计算机三基色红绿蓝中变量的数值。“$ \cdots $”表示在其他光质下烟粉虱的选择情况, 但由于数据量偏大, 且未能体现出烟粉虱的驱避作用, 故用“$ \cdots $”省略表示。同列数据后不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05)。“x” represents the value of a variable in the computer’s three primary colors RGB (red, green and blue). “$ \cdots $” means the omited value due to large amount and failure to reflect the repellent effect of B. tabaci. In the same column, different lowercase letters show significant difference at P < 0.05 level. |
下载: 导出CSV
表3多种颜色共存对烟粉虱选择行为的影响
Table3.Effects of different color light combination on selection behavior of different color lights of Bemisia tabaci
处理Treatment | 选择率Selection rate (%) | |||
蓝光Blue light | 黄光Yellow light | 绿光Green light | 未选择Not selected | |
绿光Green light | — | — | 42.00±3.74bB | 58.00±3.74aA |
黄光Yellow light | — | 54.00±4.00bA | — | 46.00±4.00bA |
蓝光+绿光Blue+green light | 20.00±3.16aB | — | 56.00±2.45aA | 24.00±4.00cB |
蓝光+黄光Blue+yellow light | 18.00±2.00aB | 68.00±3.74aA | — | 14.00±2.45cdB |
黄光+绿光Yellow+green light | — | 58.00±3.06bA | 22.00±3.06cB | 20.00±2.58cB |
黄光+蓝光+绿光Yellow+blue+green light | 2.00±2.00bC | 70.00±4.47aA | 24.00±4.00cB | 4.00±2.45dC |
同列数据后不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P < 0.05), 同一行数据后不同大写字母表示对不同颜色光间差异显著(P < 0.05)。Different lowercase letters in the same column mean significant differences among different treatments at P < 0.05 level; different capital letters in the same line mean significant differences among different color lights at P < 0.05 level. |
下载: 导出CSV
表4蓝光和黄光处理后黄瓜、黄板上烟粉虱虫量及其对烟粉虱的控制作用
Table4.Effects of blue and yellow light on number in cucumber plants and yellow boards, and control of Bemisia tabaci in greenhouse
处理Treatment | 不同处理时间成虫数量Adult number in different treatment times | 不同处理时间后成虫校正虫口减退率Corrected decrease rate of insect population in different treatment times (%) | |||||||||
单叶头数Number per leaf | 5 cm2黄板Number in 5 cm2 yellow board | ||||||||||
10 d | 20 d | 30 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | 10 d | 20 d | 30 d | |||
蓝光Blue light | 4.48±0.34b | 3.88±0.45b | 2.78±0.19b | 13.21±1.18b | 6.50±0.51a | 9.28±0.83a | 47.61±4.17 | 45.57±4.06 | 59.36±1.73 | ||
蓝光+黄光Blue + yellow light | 2.55±0.59b | 1.62±0.26c | 0.82±0.13c | 17.71±1.46a | 8.44±1.04a | 11.75±1.37a | 61.41±1.82* | 63.74±2.89* | 74.46±0.86* | ||
对照Control | 10.81±1.89a | 8.32±0.89a | 10.69±0.62a | 3.69±0.23c | 3.38±0.58b | 3.34±0.48b | |||||
同列数据后不同小写字母表示差异显著(P < 0.05)。*表示同列数据在P < 0.05水平差异显著(t测验)。In the same column, different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05)。* indicates that the data in the same column are significantly different by t test (P < 0.05). |
下载: 导出CSV
参考文献
[1] | 魏国树, 张青文, 周明牂, 等. 不同光波及光强度下棉铃虫(Helicoverpa armigera)成虫的行为反应[J]. 生物物理学报, 2000, 16(1): 89-95 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6737.2000.01.013 WEI G S, ZHANG Q W, ZHOU M Z, et al. Studies on the phototaxis of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)[J]. Acta Biophysica Sinica, 2000, 16(1): 89-95 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6737.2000.01.013 |
[2] | CHEN Z, KUANG R P, ZHOU J X, et al. Phototactic behaviour in Aphidius gifuensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae)[J]. Biocontrol Science and Technology, 2012, 22(3): 271-279 doi: 10.1080/09583157.2012.655261 |
[3] | ENDO N, WAKAKUWA M, ARIKAWA K, et al. Spectral preference in a free-flying condition of the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae)[J]. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2014, 58(2): 163 doi: 10.1303/jjaez.2014.163 |
[4] | 牛虎力, 周强. 光电诱导作用下蝗虫的光谱和光强反应行为研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2009, 9(3): 466-469 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX200903022.htm NIU H L, ZHOU Q. The study of spectral and intensity reaction on the locusts[J]. Progress in Modern Biomedicine, 2009, 9(3): 466-469 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX200903022.htm |
[5] | 王明明. 磁场和LED光照对小菜蛾生物学特性的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2010 WANG M M. Effects of magnetic field and LED (light emitting diode) illumination on biological characters of the diamondback moth, Plutella Xylosetella L. [D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2010 |
[6] | 桑文, 董婉君, 黄求应, 等. 不同光环境对粘虫生长发育的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2018, 55(5): 810-816 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCZS201805005.htm SANG W, DONG W J, HUANG Q Y, et al. Effects of different light wavelengths on the growth and reproduction of Mythimna separata[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2018, 55(5): 810-816 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCZS201805005.htm |
[7] | 褚栋, 张友军. 近10年我国烟粉虱发生为害及防治研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5): 51-55 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWBH201805008.htm CHU D, ZHANG Y J. Research progress on the damages and management of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) in China over the past 10 years[J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(5): 51-55 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWBH201805008.htm |
[8] | 杨爱民, 周福才, 胡其靖, 等. 烟粉虱对辣椒产量和品质的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2014, 35(1): 86-89 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSNX201401020.htm YANG A M, ZHOU F C, HU Q J, et al. Effccts of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) on yield and quality of pepper[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University: Agricultural and Life Science Edition, 2014, 35(1): 86-89 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JSNX201401020.htm |
[9] | 赵斌, 衡森, 陈学好, 等. 设施黄瓜烟粉虱的区域生态防控研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2017, 39(4): 784-790 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCTD201704007.htm ZHAO B, HENG S, CHEN X H, et al. Studies on regional ecological control of Bemisia tabaci in greenhouse cucumber[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2017, 39(4): 784-790 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCTD201704007.htm |
[10] | 周福才. 黄板在烟粉虱预警和诱杀中的应用[J]. 农家致富, 2019(12): 31-32 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9902.2019.12.032 ZHOU F C. Application of yellow board in early warning and trapping of Bemisia tabaci[J]. Farmers Get Rich, 2019(12): 31-32 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9902.2019.12.032 |
[11] | 衡森, 周福才, 陈学好, 等. 几种弱选择性寄主蔬菜对烟粉虱的驱避作用[J]. 生物安全学报, 2017, 26(2): 168-172 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2017.02.010 HENG S, ZHOU F C, CHEN X H, et al. Repellent effect of several low-preference host vegetables against the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2017, 26(2): 168-172 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2017.02.010 |
[12] | 陈传翔, 谢洪芳, 周福才, 等. 连栋大棚内辣椒烟粉虱的绿色防控研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(3): 669-675 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCTD201803022.htm CHEN C X, XIE H F, ZHOU F C, et al. Study on green prevention and control of whitefly on pepper planted inmulti-span greenhouse[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40(3): 669-675 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KCTD201803022.htm |
[13] | 赵建伟, 姚凤銮, 郑宇, 等. 黄色黏虫板对设施番茄烟粉虱种群的控制作用[J]. 福建农业学报, 2018, 33(8): 855-858 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJNX201808014.htm ZHAO J W, YAO F L, ZHENG Y, et al. Control effects of yellow sticky traps on population of Bemisia tabaci in greenhouse[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(8): 855-858 https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJNX201808014.htm |
[14] | REEVES J L, LORCH P D, KERSHNER M W. Vision is important for plant location by the phytophagous aquatic specialist Euhrychiopsis lecontei dietz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)[J]. Journal of Insect Behavior, 2009, 22(1): 54-64 doi: 10.1007/s10905-008-9154-z |
[15] | 陆宴辉, 张永军, 吴孔明. 植食性昆虫的寄主选择机理及行为调控策略[J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(10): 5113-5122 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.10.059 LU Y H, ZHANG Y J, WU K M. Host-plant selection mechanisms and behavioural manipulation strategies of phytophagous insects[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(10): 5113-5122 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2008.10.059 |
[16] | BULLAS-APPLETON E S, OTIS G, GILLARD C, et al. Potato leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) varietal preferences in edible beans in relation to visual and olfactory cues[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2004, 33(5): 1381-1388 doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.5.1381 |
[17] | KIM M G, LEE H S. Phototactic behavior 5: Attractive effects of the Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella, to light-emitting diodes[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry, 2014, 57(2): 259-262 doi: 10.1007/s13765-014-4079-z |
[18] | 方梅. 光因子对茄二十八星瓢虫成虫生物学特性的影响[D]. 南昌: 江西师范大学, 2018 FANG M. Effects of light factors on the biological characteristics of Henosepilachna vigintioctopunctata Fabricius adult[D]. Nanchang: Jiangxi Normal University, 2018 |
[19] | 施龙清. 福建茶小绿叶蝉种类鉴定及其对光的行为响应[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2016 SHI L Q. Identification of the tea green leafhopper in Fujian, China, and its behavioral responses to varying light contidtions[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2016 |
[20] | KIM M G, YANG J Y, CHUNG N H, et al. Photo-response of tobacco whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), to light-emitting diodes[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry, 2012, 55(4): 567-569 doi: 10.1007/s13765-012-2115-4 |
[21] | SAUNDERS D S. Insect photoperiodism: seeing the light[J]. Physiological Entomology, 2012, 37(3): 207-218 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2012.00837.x |
[22] | 周福才, 周建华, 杨爱民, 等. 性诱剂和黄板对设施蔬菜烟粉虱诱集效果的比较[J]. 生物安全学报, 2015, 24(1): 51-56 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2015.01.009 ZHOU F C, ZHOU J H, YANG A M, et al. The comparison of the effects of sex attractant and yellow sticky card to Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) on vegetables in greenhouses[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 2015, 24(1): 51-56 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2015.01.009 |