删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

表面活性剂辅助钾肥喷施对烤烟叶片润湿性能、生理指标及品质的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

王亚虹1,,
韩丹1,
高森1,
曹丽君2,
王晓丽2,
牛桂言1,
任志广1,
许自成1,,
1.河南农业大学烟草学院 郑州 450002
2.湖北省烟草公司襄阳市公司 襄阳 441003
基金项目: 中国烟草总公司湖北省公司重点科技攻关项目027Y2016-007

详细信息
作者简介:王亚虹, 主要从事烟草品质生态与质量评价研究。E-mail:yhwang30@126.com
通讯作者:许自成, 主要从事烟草品质生态学研究。E-mail:zichengxu@126.com
中图分类号:S572

计量

文章访问数:658
HTML全文浏览量:6
PDF下载量:515
被引次数:0
出版历程

收稿日期:2018-06-25
录用日期:2018-07-16
刊出日期:2018-11-01

Effects of spraying potassium fertilizer with surfactant on wettability, physiology and quality indexes of flue-cured tobacco

WANG Yahong1,,
HAN Dan1,
GAO Sen1,
CAO Lijun2,
WANG Xiaoli2,
NIU Guiyan1,
REN Zhiguang1,
XU Zicheng1,,
1. College of Tobacco Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
2. Xiangyang Branch Station, Hubei Provincial Tobacco Company, Xiangyang 441003, China
Funds: the Scientific Program of Hubei Province Corp. of China National Tobacco Corp027Y2016-007

More Information
Corresponding author:XU Zicheng, E-mail:zichengxu@126.com


摘要
HTML全文
(3)(5)
参考文献(34)
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要
摘要:为提高烟叶钾肥利用率及改善烟叶品质,以烤烟品种‘K326’为材料,利用接触角法测定了烟叶的临界表面张力;选取蔗糖脂肪酸酯、茶皂素、洗衣粉3种表面活性剂,利用表面张力法确定其临界胶束浓度;以喷施清水和单独喷施钾肥为对照,分别在钾肥中加入3种表面活性剂进行大田喷施试验(CK:喷施清水;CK1:喷施钾肥;T1:喷施钾肥+蔗糖脂肪酸酯;T2:喷施钾肥+茶皂素;T3:喷施钾肥+洗衣粉),测定不同生育期不同处理烟叶钾含量、抗氧化酶活性以及质体色素含量,并对烤后烟叶进行化学成分测定,研究了表面活性剂辅助钾肥喷施对烤烟润湿性能、生理指标及烤后烟叶品质的影响。结果表明:1)烟叶临界表面张力为30.41 mN·m-1,属于临界表面张力较低的叶片,较难被液体润湿。表面活性剂蔗糖脂肪酸酯和茶皂素的临界胶束浓度为1 000 mg·L-1、5 000 mg·L-1,对应的表面张力值为32.64 mN·m-1、40.33 mN·m-1,而洗衣粉浓度2 000 mg·L-1时的表面张力最接近烟叶的临界表面张力,对应的表面张力值为30.30 mN·m-1。加入表面活性剂后,钾肥溶液表面张力显著降低,润湿性能增加。2)表面活性剂促进了烟叶对钾肥的吸收。与单独喷施钾肥相比,加入表面活性剂后,烟叶生长过程中钾含量提高,其中T1、T2处理4个生育期烟叶钾含量均高于CK1处理。表面活性剂辅助钾肥喷施不同程度提高了烟叶SOD、POD酶活性,降低了MDA含量,烟叶抗氧化能力增强,膜脂过氧化程度降低,烟株抗逆性增强。此外,加入表面活性剂后,烟叶功能盛期叶绿素含量、类胡萝卜素含量提高,进而增强了烟叶的光合作用,有利于光合产物的合成和积累。3)加入表面活性剂后,烤后烟叶总氮和烟碱含量降低,钾含量和总糖、还原糖含量升高,化学成分更协调,烟叶品质更加优异。综合来看,添加蔗糖脂肪酸酯处理在提高烟叶润湿性能、促进钾肥吸收以及改善烟叶生理指标、提升品质方面效果最佳。
关键词:表面活性剂/
钾肥/
烤烟/
润湿性能/
生理指标/
品质
Abstract:The 'K326' flue-cured tobacco variety was used to investigate the improvement of potassium fertilizer utilization and quality of tobacco leaf under combined application of surfactant and potassium fertilizer. While in the study the contact angle method was used to determine critical surface tension of tobacco leaf, the study critical micelle concentrations of surfactants of sucrose fatty acid ester, tea saponin and washing powder were measured by using surface tension method. By spraying water and potassium fertilizer as the control, the 3 surfactants were added to potassium fertilizer in the field spraying test. In the experiment, CK was the control involving water, CK1 was the control involving potassium fertilizer, T1 was the treatment involving potassium fertilizer plus sucrose fatty acid ester, T2 was the treatment involving potassium fertilizer plus tea saponin, and T3 was the treatment involving potassium fertilizer plus washing powder. The potassium content, antioxidant enzymes activities and plastid pigments contents of tobacco leaves in 5 treatments in different times were measured, and the chemical constituents of flue-cured tobacco leaf were determined. The effects of spraying potassium fertilizer with surfactant on the wettability, physiology and quality indexes of flue-cured tobacco leaf were determined. The results indicated that:1) critical surface tension of tobacco leaf was 30.41 mN·m-1 indicating lower wettability of tobacco leaf. The critical micelle concentrations (CMC) of sucrose fatty acid ester and tea saponin were 1 000 mg·L-1 and 5 000 mg·L-1, with corresponding surface tensions of 32.64 mN·m-1 and 40.33 mN·m-1, respectively. When washing powder concentration was 2 000 mg·L-1, its surface tension (30.30 mN·m-1) was close to the critical surface tension of tobacco leaf. Under the addition of surfactant, the surface tension of potassium fertilizer solution decreased significantly while the wettability increased. 2) Surfactants promoted the absorption of potassium in tobacco leaf. Potassium contents under T1 and T2 treatments were higher than under CK1 during the growth period of tobacco. Application of potassium fertilizer with surfactant increased the activities of SOD and POD and decreased MDA content in tobacco leaf. This increased antioxidant capacity of tobacco leaf and reduced membrane lipid peroxidation. Also after the addition of surfactant, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of tobacco leaf increased at the peak function stage. This enhanced photosynthesis of tobacco leaf which in turn was conducive for the synthesis and accumulation of photosynthetic products. 3) With the addition of surfactant, the contents of total nitrogen and nicotine decreased, while those of potassium, total sugar and reducing sugar increased in flue-cured tobacco leaf. The chemical constituents were more harmonious and the quality of tobacco leaf better. In summary, the addition of sucrose fatty acid ester had the best effect in terms of improving wettability of tobacco leaf, absorption of potassium fertilizer, physiology of tobacco and quality of tobacco leaf.
Key words:Surfactant/
Potassium fertilizer/
Flue-cured tobacco/
Leaf wettability/
Physiology/
Quality

HTML全文


图1不同表面张力的液体在烤烟叶片表面的接触角余弦值
Figure1.The contact angle cosine values of different surface tension liquids on surface of flue-cured tobacco leaves


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图2不同喷施处理对不同时期烤烟叶片SOD、POD活性及MDA含量的影响
CK:喷施清水; CK1:喷施钾肥; T1:喷施钾肥+蔗糖脂肪酸酯; T2:喷施钾肥+茶皂素; T3:喷施钾肥+洗衣粉。不同小写字母表示在0.05水平差异显著。CK: spraying water; CK1: spraying potassium fertilizer; T1: spraying potassium fertilizer + sucrose fatty acid ester; T2: spraying potassium fertilizer + tea saponin; T3: spraying potassium fertilizer + washing powder. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 level.
Figure2.SOD, POD activities and MDA content of flue-cured tobacco leaves at different periods under different spraying treatments


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片


图3不同喷施处理对不同时期烤烟叶片叶绿素、类胡萝卜素含量的影响
Figure3.Chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of flue-cured tobacco leaves at different periods under different spraying treatments


下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表1不同表面张力的液体在烤烟叶片表面的接触角
Table1.The contact angle of different surface tension liquids on surface of flue-cured tobacco leaves
蔗糖脂肪酸酯浓度
Concentration of sucrose fatty acid ester
(mg·L-1)
表面张力
Surface tension
(mN·m-1)
接触角θ
Contact angle
(°)
cosθ
10 70.15 74.93 0.26
20 66.84 68.53 0.37
50 53.22 55.18 0.57
100 42.97 39.10 0.78
200 37.66 29.54 0.87


下载: 导出CSV
表23种表面活性剂不同浓度下的表面张力值
Table2.The surface tension vales of three surfactants at different concentrations
表面活性剂浓度
Surfactant concentration
(mg·L-1)
浓度对数
Concentrationlogarithm
表面张力Surface tension (mN·m-1)
蔗糖脂肪酸酯
Sucrose fatty acid ester
茶皂素
Tea saponin
洗衣粉
Washing powder
10 1.0 70.15 70.91 71.41
20 1.3 66.84 64.51 64.36
50 1.7 53.22 61.30 57.59
100 2.0 42.97 58.38 52.80
200 2.3 37.66 55.28 44.99
500 2.7 34.43 47.19 36.12
1 000 3.0 32.64 43.47 31.69
2 000 3.3 33.07 41.91 30.30
5 000 3.7 35.01 40.33 29.17
10 000 4.0 34.72 41.22 28.23


下载: 导出CSV
表3大田各处理喷施液表面张力值差异比较
Table3.Comparison of the surface tensions of spraying liquids of 5 treatments
处理
Treatment
喷施液表面张力
Surface tension of spraying liquid (mN·m-1)
CK 72.26±0.07a
CK1 72.44±0.02a
T1 28.42±0.78c
T2 42.13±1.05b
T3 27.83±0.03c
CK:喷施清水; CK1:喷施钾肥; T1:喷施钾肥+蔗糖脂肪酸酯; T2:喷施钾肥+茶皂素; T3:喷施钾肥+洗衣粉。同列数值后不同小写字母表示处理间差异达0.05显著水平。CK: spraying water; CK1: spraying potassium fertilizer; T1: spraying potassium fertilizer + sucrose fatty acid ester; T2: spraying potassium fertilizer + tea saponin; T3: spraying potassium fertilizer + washing powder. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 level.


下载: 导出CSV
表4不同喷施处理对不同时期烤烟叶钾含量的影响
Table4.Potassium contents of flue-cured tobacco leaves at different periods under different spraying treatments
处理
Treatment
烟叶钾含量
Potassium content of flue-cured tobacco leaf (%)
移栽后45 d
45 days after transplanting
移栽后60 d
60 days after transplanting
移栽后75 d
75 days after transplanting
移栽后90 d
90 days after transplanting
CK 2.86±0.04c 2.48±0.06c 1.91±0.03c 1.82±0.03c
CK1 2.91±0.03bc 2.58±0.06b 1.98±0.04b 1.88±0.03b
T1 3.06±0.07a 2.99±0.03a 2.09±0.03a 1.99±0.02a
T2 2.96±0.04b 2.62±0.02b 1.99±0.04b 1.92±0.05b
T3 3.10±0.04a 2.63±0.03b 1.94±0.02bc 1.93±0.03ab
CK:喷施清水; CK1:喷施钾肥; T1:喷施钾肥+蔗糖脂肪酸酯; T2:喷施钾肥+茶皂素; T3:喷施钾肥+洗衣粉。同列数值后不同小写字母表示处理间差异达0.05显著水平。CK: spraying water; CK1: spraying potassium fertilizer; T1: spraying potassium fertilizer + sucrose fatty acid ester; T2: spraying potassium fertilizer + tea saponin; T3: spraying potassium fertilizer + washing powder. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 level.


下载: 导出CSV
表5不同处理间烤后烟叶化学成分的差异比较
Table5.Comparison of chemical components of flue-cured tobacco leaves among different spraying treatments
处理
Treatment
还原糖
Rs (%)
总糖
Ts (%)
烟碱
Nic (%)
总氮
Tn (%)

Pot (%)

Chl (%)
糖碱比
Ts/Nic
氮碱比
Tn/Nic
两糖比
Rs/Ts
钾氯比
Pot/Chl
CK 16.29±0.72c 21.52±0.14d 2.21±0.05a 1.54±0.02a 1.70±0.02d 0.32±0.01a 9.75±0.19d 0.70±0.02ab 0.76±0.04a 5.33±0.23c
CK1 17.18±0.13b 22.41±0.10c 2.13±0.02b 1.50±0.02ab 1.79±0.04c 0.31±0.02a 10.54±0.10c 0.70±0.02ab 0.77±0.01a 5.79±0.26bc
T1 18.61±0.25a 23.39±0.07b 1.95±0.03d 1.43±0.02c 1.96±0.02a 0.29±0.02a 11.99±0.19a 0.73±0.02a 0.80±0.01a 6.85±0.41a
T2 18.32±0.23a 23.31±0.12b 2.04±0.04c 1.44±0.03c 1.89±0.04b 0.30±0.02a 11.45±0.26b 0.71±0.03ab 0.79±0.01a 6.24±0.53ab
T3 17.92±0.46ab 25.37±0.08a 2.18±0.04ab 1.49±0.02b 1.83±0.04c 0.31±0.02a 11.64±0.21ab 0.68±0.02b 0.71±0.02b 5.97±0.36bc
CK:喷施清水; CK1:喷施钾肥; T1:喷施钾肥+蔗糖脂肪酸酯; T2:喷施钾肥+茶皂素; T3:喷施钾肥+洗衣粉。同列数值后不同小写字母表示处理间差异达0.05显著水平。CK: spraying water; CK1: spraying potassium fertilizer; T1: spraying potassium fertilizer + sucrose fatty acid ester; T2: spraying potassium fertilizer + tea saponin; T3: spraying potassium fertilizer + washing powder. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences at P < 0.05 level. Rs: reducing sugar; Ts: total sugar; Nic: nicotine; Tn: total nitrogen; Pot: potassium; Chl: chloride.


下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(34)
[1]王欣, 许自成, 肖汉乾.湖南烟区烤烟钾含量与土壤钾素的分布特点之间的关系[J].安全与环境学报, 2007, 7(5):83-87 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2007.05.022
Wang X, Xu Z C, Xiao H Q. Relation between the distribution features of K-content in tobacco leaves and its content in the soil of Hunan tobacco-growing areas[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2007, 7(5):83-87 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2007.05.022
[2]郭清源, 丁松爽, 刘国顺, 等.钾用量与灌溉量对不同土层钾素及烟叶钾含量的积累效应[J].中国烟草科学, 2015, 36(1):61-67 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgyckx201501013
Guo Q Y, Ding S S, Liu G S, et al. Effect of potassium rate and irrigation frequency on potassium contents of different soil layers and tobacco leaves[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2015, 36(1):61-67 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgyckx201501013
[3]李宗泰, 陈二影, 张美玲, 等.施钾方式对棉花叶片抗氧化酶活性、产量及钾肥利用效率的影响[J].作物学报, 2012, 38(3):487-494 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb201203013
Li Z T, Chen E Y, Zhang M L, et al. Effect of potassium application methods on antioxidant enzyme activities, yield, and potassium use efficiency of cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(3):487-494 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb201203013
[4]李燕婷, 李秀英, 肖艳, 等.叶面肥的营养机理及应用研究进展[J].中国农业科学, 2009, 42(1):162-172 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.01.020
Li Y T, Li X Y, Xiao Y, et al. Advances in study on mechanism of foliar nutrition and development of foliar fertilizer application[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(1):162-172 doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.01.020
[5]孙虎.基施与叶面喷施钾肥对烤烟烟叶含钾量的影响[D].杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2010
Sun H. Effect of base and foliar applications of potassium fertilizer on flue-cured tobacco leaves[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2010
[6]徐静, 王美玲, 李婷婷, 等.烟草叶片表面蜡质成分及含量研究[J].西北农业学报, 2014, 23(4):140-145 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnyxb201404023
Xu J, Wang M L, Li T T, et al. Composition and content of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) leaf cuticular waxes[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2014, 23(4):140-145 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnyxb201404023
[7]陈海涛, 丁伟.药液在烟草叶片上湿润展布的特性研究[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 36(6):29-33 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xnnydxxb201406005
Chen H T, Ding W. Studies on wet-spreading characteristics of pesticide liquids on tobacco leaves[J]. Journal of Southwest University:Natural Science, 2014, 36(6):29-33 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xnnydxxb201406005
[8]朱墨.表面活性剂对赤霉素和铁元素在植物表面吸收作用的研究[D].郑州: 郑州大学, 2014 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10459-1014387957.htm
Zhu M. Research on the effect of surfactants on permeation of gibberellin and iron through plant cuticular[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2014 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10459-1014387957.htm
[9]腊贵晓, 孔海民, 方萍, 等.表面活性剂辅助的甲硫氨酸和色氨酸叶面喷施对芥蓝生长及菜薹芥子油苷组分和含量的影[J].中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(4):439-446 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2014409&flag=1
La G X, Kong H M, Fang P, et al. Effects of foliage spray of methionine and tryptophan with surfactant active agent on growth and bolting stem glucosinolate composition of Chinese kale[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(4):439-446 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2014409&flag=1
[10]冯柱安.抑芽敏加活性剂对烤烟的抑芽促产增值效果[J].烟草科技, 1994, (3):34-36 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YCKJ403.015.htm
Feng Z A. Effect of suckercide and active agent on bud inhibition and growth of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 1994, (3):34-36 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YCKJ403.015.htm
[11]Law K Y, Zhao H. Determination of solid surface tension by contact angle[M]//Law K Y, Zhao H. Surface Wetting: Characterization, Contact Angle, and Fundamentals. Cham: Springer, 2016
[12]邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000
Zou Q. Experimental Guide of Plant Physiology[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2000
[13]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000
Li H S. Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological Biochemical Experiment[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2000
[14]王瑞新.烟草化学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2003
Wang R X. Tobacco Chemistry[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2003
[15]陈江华, 刘建利, 龙怀玉.中国烟叶矿质营养及主要化学成分含量特征研究[J].中国烟草学报, 2004, 10(5):20-27 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2004.05.004
Chen J H, Liu J L, Long H Y. The distribution characteristics of nutrition elements and main chemical composition in China's tobacco leaves[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2004, 10(5):20-27 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2004.05.004
[16]刘国顺, 何永秋, 杨永锋, 等.不同钾肥配施对烤烟质体色素和碳氮代谢及品质的影响[J].中国烟草科学, 2013, 34(6):49-55 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgyckx201306011
Liu G S, He Y Q, Yang Y F, et al. Effects of combining application of various potassium fertilizers on plastid pigment, carbon-nitrogen metabolism and quality in flue-cured tobacco[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2013, 34(6):49-55 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgyckx201306011
[17]吴彦辉, 薛立新, 许自成, 等.断根结合生长素和钾肥施用对烤烟生长及糖碱比、有机钾指数的影响[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(18):5686-5695 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201318031
Wu Y H, Xue L X, Xu Z C, et al. Combined effects of root cutting, auxin application, and potassium fertilizer on growth, sugar:Nicotine ratio, and organic potassium index of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(18):5686-5695 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201318031
[18]许小龙, 徐广春, 徐德进, 等.炔草酯微乳剂药液在菵草叶片上的润湿和持留特性分析[J].植物保护学报, 2015, 42(3):453-459 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwbhxb201503025
Xu X L, Xu G C, Xu D J, et al. Analysis of the wettability and retention of clodinafop-propargyl ME solutions on American sloughgrass Beckmannia syzigachne leaves[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2015, 42(3):453-459 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwbhxb201503025
[19]肖艳, 曹一平, 王敬国, 等.提高作物叶面养分吸收的复合型助剂研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(3):281-285 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2004.03.012
Xiao Y, Cao Y P, Wang J G, et al. Research of mixed adjuvants on the absorption of nutrient elements in crop leaf[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2004, 10(3):281-285 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2004.03.012
[20]肖艳, 唐永康, 曹一平, 等.表面活性剂在叶面肥中的应用与进展[J].磷肥与复肥, 2003, 18(4):14-15 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6220.2003.04.004
Xiao Y, Tang Y K, Cao Y P, et al. Application of surfactants in fertilizer for foliage dressing and its progress[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2003, 18(4):14-15 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6220.2003.04.004
[21]吴文炳, 林雅彬, 陈建华.表面活性剂改性4A分子筛对Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附行为[J].环境工程学报, 2014, 8(9):3620-3624 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=HJJZ201409016&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
Wu W B, Lin Y B, Chen J H. Adsorption behavior of surfactant-modified molecular sieve 4A for Cr (Ⅵ)[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2014, 8(9):3620-3624 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=HJJZ201409016&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[22]Howard D D, Gwathmey C O. Influence of surfactants on potassium uptake and yield response of cotton to foliar potassium nitrate[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1995, 18(12):2669-2680 doi: 10.1080/01904169509365092
[23]叶小利, 李学刚, 陈时洪, 等.蔗糖脂肪酸酯对大豆叶片超氧化物歧化酶和叶绿素的影响[J].大豆科学, 2000, 19(4):330-336 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2000.04.007
Ye X L, Li X G, Chen S H, et al. The effects of sucrose fatty acid ester (SFE) on the activity of superoxide dismutase and chlorophyll of soybean leaf[J]. Soybean Science, 2000, 19(4):330-336 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2000.04.007
[24]王强, 王邦俊.表面活性剂PPJ对小麦叶子吸收营养物质的影响[J].西南农业大学学报, 2001, 23(2):113-116 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9868.2001.02.006
Wang Q, Wang J B. Effects of surfactant PPJ on the absorption of nutrient elements in wheat leaves[J]. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University, 2001, 23(2):113-116 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9868.2001.02.006
[25]Stevens P J G, Gaskin R E, Hong S O, et al. Contributions of stomatal infiltration and cuticular penetration to enhancements of foliar uptake by surfactants[J]. Pesticide Science, 1991, 33(3):371-382 doi: 10.1002/ps.v33:3
[26]叶小利, 李学刚, 陈时洪, 等.表面活性剂对大豆叶面气孔和蜡质层影响研究[J].大豆科学, 2000, 19(1):49-56 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2000.01.009
Ye X L, Li X G, Chen S H, et al. The effects of surfactants on stomata and epicuticular wax structure of soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2000, 19(1):49-56 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2000.01.009
[27]柴凌燕, 董易凡, 李士伟, 等.植物角质膜及其渗透性与抗旱性研究进展[J].植物研究, 2010, 30(6):763-768 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=MBZW201006026&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
Chai L Y, Dong Y F, Li S W, et al. Research progress in the penetrability and drought resistance of plant cuticular[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2010, 30(6):763-768 http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=MBZW201006026&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[28]Bussotti F, Bottacci A, Grossoni P, et al. Cytological and structural changes in Pinus pines L. needles following the application of an anionic surfactant[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 1997, 20(4):513-520 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-91.x/full
[29]刘华山, 曾涛, 韩锦峰, 等.淋溶对烟草叶片中钾素外排的影响[J].植物生理学通讯, 2005, 41(2):183 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwslxtx200502041
Liu H S, Zeng T, Han J F, et al. Effects of eluviation on the efflux of potassium in tobacco leaves[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 2005, 41(2):183 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwslxtx200502041
[30]王亚虹, 许自成, 高森, 等.烟草干旱胁迫研究进展[J].节水灌溉, 2016, (12):103-107 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2016.12.022
Wang Y H, Xu Z C, Gao S, et al. Research progress of tobacco drought stress[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2016, (12):103-107 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4929.2016.12.022
[31]牛慧伟, 许自成, 邵惠芳, 等.不同生育期遮荫淹水对烤烟形态及抗氧化系统的影响[J].中国烟草学报, 2012, 18(5):39-45 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5708.2012.05.007
Niu H W, Xu Z C, Shao H F, et al. Effects of shading and waterlogging on morphology and antioxidants of flue-cured tobacco at different growth stages[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2012, 18(5):39-45 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5708.2012.05.007
[32]李俊, 张爱玉, 齐永杰, 等.茶树油粕中茶皂素研究进展[J].食品科学, 2012, 33(1):276-279 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXJG201404008.htm
Li J, Zhang A Y, Qi Y J, et al. Research progress in tea saponin from oil residue of camellia semiserrata[J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(1):276-279 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXJG201404008.htm
[33]贾国涛, 马一琼, 陈芳泉, 等.枸溶性硅肥对烤烟生理指标和烟叶品质的影响[J].中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(6):43-48 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgyckx201606008
Jia G T, Ma Y Q, Chen F Q, et al. Effect of a citrate-soluble silicon fertilizer on physiological indexes and quality of flue-cured tobacco leaves[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2016, 37(6):43-48 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgyckx201606008
[34]孙燕.大花蕙兰花生壳基质栽培及叶面施肥研究[D].北京: 北京林业大学, 2015
Sun Y. Studies on peanuts shell media and foliar fertilizer for Cymbidium hybridum[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015

相关话题/烟草 植物 生理 科学 指标