1.Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China 2.State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China 3.College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4.College of Oceanography, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China Manuscript received: 2021-01-28 Manuscript revised: 2021-05-27 Manuscript accepted: 2021-06-03 Abstract:It is well known that on the interannual timescale, the westward extension of the western North Pacific subtropical high (WNPSH) results in enhanced rainfall over the Yangtze River basin (YRB) in summer, and vice versa. This study identifies that this correspondence experiences a decadal change in the late 1970s. That is, the WNPSH significantly affects YRB precipitation (YRBP) after the late 1970s (P2) but not before the late 1970s (P1). It is found that enhanced interannual variability of the WNPSH favors its effect on YRB rainfall in P2. On the other hand, after removing the strong WNPSH cases in P2 and making the WNPSH variability equivalent to that in P1, the WNPSH can still significantly affect YRB rainfall, suggesting that the WNPSH variability is not the only factor that affects the WNPSH–YRBP relationship. Further results indicate that the change in basic state of thermal conditions in the tropical WNP provides a favorable background for the enhanced WNPSH–YRBP relationship. In P2, the lower-tropospheric atmosphere in the tropical WNP gets warmer and wetter, and thus the meridional gradient of climatological equivalent potential temperature over the YRB is enhanced. As a result, the WNPSH-related circulation anomalies can more effectively induce YRB rainfall anomalies through affecting the meridional gradient of equivalent potential temperature over the YRB. Keywords: Yangtze River basin, western North Pacific subtropical high, rainfall, interannual relationship, decadal change 摘要:西太平洋副热带高压(副高)的年际变动对长江流域夏季降水有重要影响。一般来说,副高偏西(东)时,长江流域降水增多(减少)。本文发现,副高和长江流域降水的这种对应关系在1970s末发生了一次年代际转变,即副高在1970s末之后可以显著地影响长江流域降水,但在此之前其影响很弱。其中一个原因是副高的变率在1970s末之后增强,使得其对长江流域降水的影响增强。此外,我们去除后一阶段的强副高个例,使前后两个阶段的变率基本一致,发现副高的变动依然可以显著地影响长江流域降水,表明副高变率的增强并不是导致其影响加强的唯一原因。进一步的研究结果表明,热带西北太平洋热力背景场的改变为副高和长江流域降水关系的增强提供了有利条件。1970s末之后,热带西北太平洋的低层大气变得更暖、更湿,增强了长江流域相当位温的经向梯度。因此,副高的变动可以更有效地引起长江流域的相当位温梯度异常,进而影响长江流域降水。 关键词:西太平洋副热带高压, 长江流域夏季降水, 年际关系, 年代际转变,
HTML
--> --> -->
2. Data and indices This study uses the monthly Japanese 55-Year Reanalysis (JRA-55; Kobayashi et al., 2015) dataset with a horizontal resolution of 1.25° × 1.25°. Also used are monthly rainfall data from 160 stations in China provided by the China Meteorological Administration. In addition, the National Centers for Environmental Prediction–National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) reanalysis 1 (Kalnay et al., 1996) and the last release of the European Centre for Medium–Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) reanalysis ERA5 (Hersbach et al., 2020) are used to repeat the main analyses to verify the results, which are partly shown in this paper. All data are extracted for the period of 1958–2019, and summer (June–August, JJA) is the focus of this study. We define two indices to facilitate the descriptions of YRB rainfall and the WNPSH. The YRB is defined as the land area that lies from 107.5°E eastward and between 27°N and 34°N, which is identical to the previous studies (Li and Lu, 2017, 2018). There are 32 stations evenly spaced across this region. The Yangtze River basin precipitation index (YRBPI) is defined as the summer precipitation anomalies averaged over these stations. Previous studies have reported that there is an abrupt increase of YRB rainfall since the end of the 1970s (e.g., Huang et al., 1999; Gong and Ho, 2002; Luo et al., 2013; Li and Lu, 2017). Indeed, the YRBPI increased by 0.93 mm d?1 from 1958–79 to 1980–2019, which is statistically significant at the 99% confidence level. Therefore, to obtain the interannual component of the YRBPI, the averages during the periods of 1958–79 and 1980–2019 are subtracted from the original time series of the YRBPI, following the previous study (Li and Lu, 2017). The variance of the YRBPI is 0.84 mm2 d?2 during 1958–79, comparable to that during 1980–2019 (0.76 mm2 d?2). The WNPSH has been described by various variables in both the middle troposphere and lower troposphere (e.g., Nitta and Hu, 1996; Hu, 1997; Lu and Dong, 2001; Gong and Ho, 2002; Zhou et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2015; Li and Lu, 2020). In this study, we focus on the zonal shift of the WNPSH in the lower troposphere because of the following reasons. First, the WNPSH tends to be stronger and much more stable in the lower troposphere than in the middle troposphere (Lu, 2002; Lu et al., 2008). Second, the water vapor transport, which is crucial for inducing YRB rainfall, is concentrated in the lower troposphere. Figure 1 shows the 850-hPa horizontal wind anomalies regressed onto the normalized YRBPI during 1958–2019. A significant anticyclonic anomaly appears over the subtropical WNP, which corresponds to the westward extension of the WNPSH. Associated with this anticyclonic anomaly, there are significant negative values of relative vorticity over the subtropical WNP. The WNPSH index (WNPSHI) is defined as the 850-hPa relative vorticity anomalies averaged over the region (12.5°–22.5°N, 110°–117.5°E), where relative vorticity anomalies are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level, and then multiplied by minus one. This region is smaller and shifted relatively westward in comparison to those used in earlier studies (e.g., Lu et al., 2008; Huang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2017). This region was chosen because it represents the western edge of the anticyclonic anomaly, and the wind anomalies there can directly affect YRB rainfall. A positive (negative) WNPSHI indicates that the WNPSH extends westward (retreats eastward) and there is an anticyclonic (cyclonic) anomaly over the subtropical WNP. Previous studies defined the WNPSHI by using other variables in the lower troposphere, such as geopotential height (Lu, 2001, 2002; Lu and Dong, 2001; Lee et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013), eddy geopotential height (Huang et al., 2015), and horizontal winds (Wang and Fan, 1999; Wang et al., 2001). We compare our WNPSHI with these previous studies and find that most of the correlation coefficients between them are greater than 0.70 during 1958–2019 (Table 1), implying strong consistency between the present and previous WNPSHIs in representing the interannual variability of the WNPSH. In addition, there is a cyclonic anomaly over the Korea Peninsula and south Japan and an anticyclonic anomaly over northeast Asia. These circulation anomalies are in good agreement with previous results (e.g., Wang et al., 2001; Li and Lu, 2017, 2020; Li et al., 2021). Figure1. Regression of 850-hPa horizontal winds (vectors; m s?1) with respect to the normalized YRBPI during 1958–2019, based on the JRA-55 dataset. Grey shading indicates that either zonal or meridional wind anomalies are significant at the 95% confidence level based on Student’s t-test. Red cross-hatching indicates that the negative 850-hPa relative vorticity anomalies are significant at the 95% confidence level. The land area represented by the black box represents the defined YRB, and the relative vorticity anomalies averaged over the red box are used to define the WNPSHI (see text for details). Black shading represents mountains higher than 1500 m.
Table1. Correlation coefficients between the WNPSHI in the present and previous studies. Here, u, hgt, and vor indicate the 850-hPa zonal wind, geopotential height, and relative vorticity, respectively. The correlation coefficients are all significant at the 99% confidence level according to the Student’s t-test.
-->
4.1. Role of the decadal change of WNPSH interannual variability
It has been reported that the interannual variability of the WNPSH shows an enhancement since the late 1970s (Wang et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2010). Indeed, the standard deviation of the WNPSHI during 1980–2019 is greater than that during 1958–79 (3.03 × 10?6 s?1 versus 2.39 × 10?6 s?1), and the WNP anticyclonic anomaly in the latter period is stronger than that in the former period (Figs. 5a and 5b), consistent with previous studies. To explore the impacts of WNPSH interannual variability, we define strong (weak) WNPSH anomalies to be when the absolute value of the WNPSHI is greater (smaller) than 1.0 standard deviation in the latter period. There are 11 strong WNPSHI years and 29 weak WNPSHI cases based on this criterion. After removing the strong WNPSHI cases, the standard deviation of the WNPSHI is 1.58 × 10?6 s?1, smaller than that during 1958–79 (2.39 × 10?6 s?1). Figure 6 shows the rainfall anomalies over stations regressed onto the normalized WNPSHI for the strong and weak cases, respectively, in the latter period. Associated with the strong WNPSH (Fig. 6a), there are strong positive rainfall anomalies over the YRB. The average rainfall anomaly over the YRB is 0.93 mm d?1. The correlation coefficient between the WNPSHI and YRBPI is 0.76, which is significant at the 99% confidence level. For the weak WNPSH (Fig. 6b), enhanced rainfall also appears over the YRB, while the anomalies become weaker, as expected. The average rainfall anomaly over the YRB is reduced to 0.37 mm d?1, and the correlation coefficient between the WNPSHI and YRBPI decreases to 0.52. These results suggest that the WHPSHI interannual variability plays a role in affecting the WNPSH–YRBP relationship. On the other hand, the WNPSH–YRBP relationship for the weak cases is still stronger than that in the former period, and the correlation coefficient (0.52) is also significant at the 90% confidence level. These results suggest that the change of WNPSH interannual variability is not the only factor that results in the decadal change of the WNPSH–YRBP relationship. Figure6. As in Fig. 4, but for the (a) strong and (b) weak WNPSHI in 1980–2019.
Figure 7 shows the 850-hPa horizontal wind anomalies regressed onto the normalized WNPSHI for the strong and weak cases. For both the strong and weak WNPSH, there is an anticyclonic anomaly over the tropical WNP, and a cyclonic anomaly appears over midlatitude East Asia. The anticyclonic anomaly for the strong cases is much stronger than the weak cases (Figs. 7a and 7b), as expected. However, the anticyclonic anomaly for the weak cases can still induce significant rainfall anomalies over the YRB (Figs. 6b and 7b). Similar results were obtained by using the NCEP1 or ERA5 datasets (not shown). Figure7. As in Fig. 5, but for the (a) strong and (b) weak WNPSHI in 1980–2019.
2 4.2. Role of the decadal change of basic state -->
4.2. Role of the decadal change of basic state
Figure 8 shows the climatology maps of temperature, specific humidity, and θe during the periods 1958–79 and 1980–2019 based on the JRA-55 dataset. The differences between the latter and former periods are shown in the bottom panels. For both periods, the high temperature (Figs. 8a and 8d) and specific humidity (Figs. 8b and 8e) values dominate the South China Sea and the tropical WNP, in a tongue-shaped pattern. Both temperature and specific humidity decrease with latitude over the north of the tongue and show a maximum meridional gradient over the northeast. However, compared to the former period, the tropical warm and moist region is larger in the latter period (Figs. 8a and 8d; Figs. 8b and 8e). The differences between the latter and former periods show significantly warmer and wetter conditions in the tropical WNP and South China Sea (Figs. 8g and 8h). Figure8. Climatology of 850-hPa (left-hand panels) temperature, (middle panels) specific humidity, and (right-hand panels) equivalent potential temperature (θe) during (a–c) 1958–79 and (d–f) 1980–2019, and (g–i) the difference between the latter and former periods. Results are based on the JRA-55 dataset. The contour interval is 1.0 K in (a) and (d), 1.0 g Kg?1 in (b) and (e), and 3.0 K in (c) and (f). In (g–i), the contour intervals are 0.2 K, 0.2 g Kg?1, and 0.6 K, respectively, and zero contours are omitted. Red and blue shadings in Figs. 8g-8i indicate that the positive and negative anomalies are significant at the 95% confidence level, respectively, based on Student’s t-test.
The warmer and wetter conditions in the tropics in the latter period can also be inferred from the higher values of θe (Fig. 8i), which combines temperature and humidity. Higher θe in the tropical WNP, including the region south of the YRB, enhances the meridional gradient of climatological θe over the YRB in the latter period. The difference in climatological θe between the southern edge [averaged over (27°N, 107.5°–120°E)] and the northern edge [averaged over (34°N, 107.5°–120°E)] of the YRB (e.g., Chang et al., 2000; Li and Lu, 2017, 2018) increased by 0.93 K in the latter period, which is 15.3% of the climatological difference in the former period (6.05 K). Slightly changing the southern and northern edges leads to similar results. For instance, the difference in climatological θe between the southern and northern edges increased by 13.3% in the latter period, if defining the southern and northern edges of the YRB as 26°N and 35°N, respectively. The enhanced meridional gradient in climatological θe can favor the role of the WNPSH in affecting YRB rainfall, as the similar anticyclonic/cyclonic anomaly associated with the WNPSH can more effectively induce θe gradient anomalies over the YRB in the latter period. It is notable that the difference in specific humidity, as well as the resultant θe, between the latter and former periods shows extremely high values over the Philippine Sea (Figs. 8h and 8i), which probably result from the dry bias center over this region in the former period (Kobayashi et al., 2015). To guarantee the reliability of the results, we explored the change in basic state of tropical thermal conditions by using the other reanalysis datasets (NCEP1 and ERA5 datasets) and obtained similar results. For instance, Fig. 9 shows the thermal conditions obtained from the ERA5 dataset. The results are basically consistent with those shown in Fig. 8. For instance, the difference of climatological θe between the southern and northern edges of the YRB increases by 16.7%. In addition, there are no extremely high values over the Philippine Sea (Figs. 9h and 9i). These results confirm that the warmer and wetter conditions in the tropics enhance the meridional gradient of climatological θe over the YRB in the latter period, and thus the WNPSH-related circulation can more effectively induce θe gradient and resultant YRB rainfall anomalies. Figure9. As in Fig. 8, but based on the ERA5 dataset.