军事利用民用卫星的国际法问题
吴晓丹; 1:哈尔滨工业大学 2:意大利米兰大学 摘要(Abstract)：

作为数量最多、用途最广、发展最快的空间物体,卫星具有广泛的军事应用价值。当代战争和冲突越来越依赖各种卫星功能,军事化利用商业卫星已成为不容忽视的现象。随着技术的发展和非国家实体的广泛参与,空间活动发生深刻变化。卫星的民用与军用界限日趋模糊,空间活动商业化使之愈加复杂,从而对现有的空间法和战争法等国际法规则提出来一系列的挑战。现有国际法律框架已无法充分有效应对和解决。为维持国际和平与安全,国际社会应加强对军事利用民用卫星的规范。

关键词(KeyWords)： 民用卫星;;军事利用;;国际法;;外空非军事化

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 司法部2008年度“国家法治与法学理论研究项目”、“外空非武器化的法治构建”(课题编号08SFB5027)的阶段性成果

作者(Author): 吴晓丹;

Email:


参考文献(References)： [1]G.Gál,MilitarySpace Activityin the Light ofGeneral International Law,Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Colloquium on the Lawof Out-er Space,2002,p.164.[2]见联合国和平利用外空委员会,科技小组委员会第25次工作会议报告,UN Doc A/AC.105/409,1988.[1]M.D.S.Anderson,AMilitary Look into Space:The Ultimate High Ground,Army Lawyer,1995,November,p.21.[2]同上注。p.20.[3]C.M.Petras,The Use ofForce in Response to Cyber-Attack on Commercial Space Systems-Reexamining“Self-Defense”in Outer Space in Light ofThe Convergence ofU.S.Military and Commercial Space Activities,Journal of Air Law and Commerce,Fall,2002,p.1214.[4]E.S.Waldrop,Integration ofMilitaryandCivilian Space Assets:Legal andNational SecurityImplications,Air Force LawReview,2004,p.164.[5]R.A.Morgan,Military Use ofCommercial Communication Satellite:ANewLook at the OuterSpace Treatyand“Peaceful Purposes”,Jour-nal of Air Law and Commerce,1994,p.265.[6]W.T.Mallison,The Laws ofWar and the Juridical Control ofWeapons ofMass Destruction in General And Limited Wars,36George Wash-ingtonLawReview,1967,p.308,326.R.L.Bridge,International Lawand Military Activities in Outer Space,13Akron Law Review,1980,p.649.[7]M.R.A.Ramey,Armed Conflict on the Final Frontier:The LawofWar in Space,48The Air Force Law Review,2000,p.100-106.[1]R.A.Morgan,Military Use ofCommercial Communication Satellites:ANewLook at the Outer Space Treaty and“Peaceful Purposes”,60Journal of Air Law&Commerce,1994,p.300.[4]第2条第四款规定各会员国在其国际关系上不得使用武力或武力威胁,或以与《联合国宪章》不符的任何其他方法,侵犯任何国家的领土完整或政治独立。而且国际法院在“尼加拉瓜诉美国”案件的判决中认定这个原则是强行法和习惯法,对所有国家均有约束力。见Report of International Court of Justice,1986,p.190.[5]M.C.M.Petras,“Space Force Alpha”:MilitaryUse ofthe International Space Station andthe Concept of“Peaceful Purposes”,53The Air Force Law Review,2002,p.158-159.[6]美国一贯主张外空可以行使自卫权。中国与俄罗斯提议的《防止在外空放置武器,对外空物体使用或威胁使用武力条约》草案第5条规定:本条约的任何内容不应被认为会妨碍各缔约国根据《联合国宪章》第51条行使自卫权。[7]M.S.M.Dougal,H.D.Laswell,I.A.Vlasic,Lawand Public Order in Outer Space,Yale University Press,1963,p.441.[8]C.M.Petras,The Use ofForce in Response to Cyber-Attack on Commercial Space Systems-Reexamining“Self-Defense”in Outer Space in Light ofThe Convergence ofU.S.Military and Commercial Space Activities,Journal of Air Law and Commerce,2002,p.1250,p.1255.[1]A.T.Park,Incremental Steps for Achieving Space Security:The Need for ANewWayofThinking to Enhance the Legal Regime for Space,28Houston Journal of International Law.2006,p.894.[3]有学者进一步将自卫依据其启动门槛分为三种:针对实际进攻的反应性自卫;针对明显的和迫近的进攻危险的预防性自卫和针对猜测的和可能进攻或者未来进攻可能性的先发制人自卫。启动门槛依次降级,单边的解释权限逐个变宽。W.M.Reisman,A.Arm-strong,The Past and Future ofthe Claim ofPreemptive Self-Defense,100American Journal of International Law,2006,p.526.[4]C.Pierson,Preemptive Self-Defense in an Age ofWeapons ofMass Destruction:Operation Iraqi Freedom,33Denver Journal of Interna-tional Law and Policy,2004,p.150-177.O.K.Obayemi,Legal Standards Governing Pre-Emptive Strikes and Forcible Measures ofAnticipatory Self-Defense under the U.N.Charter and General International Law,Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law,2006,Spring,p.21-41.M.Skopets,Battered Nation Syndrome:Relaxing the Imminence Requirement ofSelf-Defense in International Law,55American University Law Review,2006,p.753-784.[5]D.S.Winner,International Lawat a Crossroads:Self-Defense,Global Terrorism,and Preemption:A Call to Rethink the Self-Defense Normative Framework,13Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems,2003,p.771-802.J.A.Cohan,The Bush Doctrine and the Emerging Norm ofAnticipatory Self-Defense in Customary International Law,15Pace International Law Review,2003,p.283-351.[6]M.J.E.Kastenber,The Use ofConventional International Lawin Combating Terrorism:AMaginot Line for Modern Civilization Employing the Principles ofAnticipatorySelf-Defense,55Air Force LawReview,2004,p.87-125.D.A.Sadoff,AQuestion ofDeterminacy:The Legal Status ofAnticipatory Self-Defense,40Georgetown Journal of International Law,2009,p.562.[7]M.J.Kelly,Time Warpto1945-Resurrection ofthe Reprisal and AnticipatorySelf-Defense Doctrines in International Law,13Journal of Transnational Lawand Policy,2003,p.1-39.T.M.Franck,Preemption,Prevention andAnticipatorySelf-Defense:NewLawRegardingRecourse to Force,27Hasting International and Comparative LawReview,2004,p.425-434.W.M.Reisman,A.Armstrong,The Past and Future ofthe Claim ofPreemptive Self-Defense,100American Journal of International Law,2006,p.525-550.D.A.Sadoff,A Question ofDeterminacy:The Legal Status ofAnticipatory Self-Defense,40Georgetown Journal of International Law,2009,p.523-580.[8]如1986年尼加拉瓜案判决,第14段。2003年伊朗诉美国石油平台案判决,第161段。2004年关于在巴勒斯坦被占领土上修建隔离墙的咨询意见,第139段。2005年刚果诉乌干达案判决,第109段。10A More Secure World:Our Shared Responsibility,Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats,Challenges and Change,UN Doc.A/59/565,para.54,2004.[4]M.Bourbonniere,R.J.Lee,Legality ofthe Deployment ofConventional Weapons in Earth Orbit:Balancing Space Law and the Law ofArmed Conflict,European Journal of International Law,November,2007,p.873.M.R.A.Ramey,Armed Conflict on the Final Frontier:The LawofWar in Space,48(1)Air Force LawReview,2000,p.63.L.Grego,ABan on Destructive Anti-Satellite Weapons:Useful and Feasible,Celebratingthe Space Age:50Years of Space Technology,40Years of the Outer Space Treaty,Conference Report,Geneva,UNIDIR,2007,p.201-206.[2]L.Scheetz,Infusing Environmental Ethics into the Space Weapons Dialogue,Georgetown International Environmental Law Review,Fall2006,p.63.[3]“对《禁止为军事或其它敌对目的使用改变环境的技术的公约》有关问题的解释”,见联合国裁军会议决议,CCD/520,Annex A,1976年9月3日。[1]外交部网站,2008年3月访问。[1]贺其治:《外层空间法》,法律出版社1992年版。[2]赵云:《外空商业化和外空法的新发展》,知识产权出版社2008年版。[3][英]詹宁斯.瓦茨修订:《奥本海国际法》,第1卷第2分册,王铁崖等译,中国大百科全书出版社1998年版。[4]苑立伟,杨建军,阳家宏:“美国反卫星武器综述”,载《中国航天》2004年第10期。[5][意]马可.皮卓兹、赵海峰:《国际空间法教程》,吴晓丹译,黑龙江人民出版社2006年版。[6]凌岩主编:《国际空间法问题新论》,人民法院出版社2006年版。