data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
福建师范大学心理学院, 福州 350000
收稿日期:
2019-07-05出版日期:
2020-04-25发布日期:
2020-02-25通讯作者:
叶一舵E-mail:yeyiduo@163.comThe depth of conceptual processing affects the metaphorical connection between moral concepts and horizontal orientation
WANG Congxing, MA Jianping, DENG Jue, YANG Zhongwang, YE Yiduo(data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350000, China
Received:
2019-07-05Online:
2020-04-25Published:
2020-02-25Contact:
YE Yiduo E-mail:yeyiduo@163.com摘要/Abstract
摘要: 通过6个实验探究了不同概念加工深度下道德概念与水平方位的隐喻联结。实验1采用迫选任务范式, 实验2、实验3和实验4均采用空间Stroop范式, 实验5和实验6均采用启动范式。结果发现:(1)在思维迫选中存在道德与左、不道德与右的隐喻联结; (2)在较深、中等概念加工深度下发现了隐喻一致性效应, 在较浅概念加工深度下未发现这种效应; (3)在较浅概念加工深度下始源域和目标域之间的映射均不存在, 即未在启动范式中发现隐喻联结。结果表明:道德概念与水平方位存在隐喻联结, 这种隐喻联结中左表征道德、右表征不道德, 并同时受到始源域和目标域加工深度的影响。
图/表 7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3460d/3460d9477df32730b814bfd08c8a22ded8062106" alt=""
图1纸笔测验图
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3460d/3460d9477df32730b814bfd08c8a22ded8062106" alt=""
表1迫选任务中将词汇放置于左右水平方位的个数
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | |
---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | |
左侧 | 443 | 228 |
右侧 | 217 | 432 |
表1迫选任务中将词汇放置于左右水平方位的个数
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | |
---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | |
左侧 | 443 | 228 |
右侧 | 217 | 432 |
表2词性判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | |
---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | |
左侧 | 846.37 ± 194.13 | 933.44 ± 232.75 |
右侧 | 880.53 ± 209.41 | 922.30 ± 216.77 |
表2词性判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | |
---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | |
左侧 | 846.37 ± 194.13 | 933.44 ± 232.75 |
右侧 | 880.53 ± 209.41 | 922.30 ± 216.77 |
表3词性判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | |
---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | |
左侧 | 752.85 ± 105.45 | 810.31 ± 124.02 |
右侧 | 775.43 ± 130.71 | 795.48 ± 128.06 |
表3词性判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | |
---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | |
左侧 | 752.85 ± 105.45 | 810.31 ± 124.02 |
右侧 | 775.43 ± 130.71 | 795.48 ± 128.06 |
表4词汇分类判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | 假词 | |
左侧 | 751.09 ± 60.86 | 814.12 ± 63.54 | 822.75 ± 54.00 |
右侧 | 769.77 ± 54.81 | 824.21 ± 56.74 | 840.91 ± 73.62 |
表4词汇分类判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | 假词 | |
左侧 | 751.09 ± 60.86 | 814.12 ± 63.54 | 822.75 ± 54.00 |
右侧 | 769.77 ± 54.81 | 824.21 ± 56.74 | 840.91 ± 73.62 |
表5词汇分类判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | 假词 | |
左侧 | 619.54 ± 73.28 | 633.32 ± 80.49 | 681.36 ± 84.25 |
右侧 | 624.40 ± 79.87 | 648.10 ± 77.23 | 681.54 ± 78.12 |
表5词汇分类判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | 假词 | |
左侧 | 619.54 ± 73.28 | 633.32 ± 80.49 | 681.36 ± 84.25 |
右侧 | 624.40 ± 79.87 | 648.10 ± 77.23 | 681.54 ± 78.12 |
表6字母分类判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | 假词 | |
左侧 | 651.40 ± 191.68 | 650.80 ± 187.16 | 655.40 ± 191.43 |
右侧 | 633.96 ± 191.71 | 619.23 ± 159.43 | 640.55 ± 181.27 |
表6字母分类判断的平均反应时和标准差
水平方位 | 词汇类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
道德词 | 不道德词 | 假词 | |
左侧 | 651.40 ± 191.68 | 650.80 ± 187.16 | 655.40 ± 191.43 |
右侧 | 633.96 ± 191.71 | 619.23 ± 159.43 | 640.55 ± 181.27 |
参考文献 44
[1] | Banerjee P., Chatterjee P., & Sinha J . (2012). Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23(4), 407-409. |
[2] | Bargh J. A., & Tota M. E . (1988). Context-dependent automatic processing in depression: Accessibility of negative constructs with regard to self but not others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 925-939. |
[3] | Barsalou L. W . (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577-660. |
[4] | Barsalou L. W . (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617-645. |
[5] | Boroditsky L . (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1-28. |
[6] | Casasanto D . (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351-367. |
[7] | Casasanto D . (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 378-383. |
[8] | Casasanto D., & Henetz T . (2012). Handedness shapes children’s abstract concepts. Cognitive Science, 36(2), 359-372. |
[9] | Chen X., Jiang Q., Hou M., & Zhu M. Y . (2014). Embodied morality: A new approach in moral psychology. Psychological Development and Education, 30(6), 664-672. |
[ 陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音 . (2014). 具身道德: 道德心理学研究的新取向. 心理发展与教育, 30(6), 664-672.] | |
[10] | Craik F. I. M., & Lockhart R. S . (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684. |
[11] | Gibbs R. W. Jr. , (Eds).(2006) . Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
[12] | He X. L., Chen J., Zhang E. T., & Li J. N . (2015). Bidirectional associations of power and size in a priming task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 290-300. |
[13] | Hill P. L., & Lapsley D. K . (2009). The ups and downs of the moral personality: Why it's not so black and white. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 520-523. |
[14] | Holyoak K. J., & Stamenković D . (2018). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 641-671. |
[15] | Huang Y., Tse C.-S., & Xie J . (2018). The bidirectional congruency effect of brightness-valence metaphoric association in the Stroop-like and priming paradigms. Acta Psychologica, 189(10), 76-92. |
[16] | Hyde T. S., & Jenkins J. J . (1973). Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12(5), 471-480. |
[17] | Jia L, & Jiang G. F . (2016). The vertical spatial metaphor of moral concepts: Psychological reality and bidirectional mapping. Psychological Development and Education, 32(2), 158-165. |
[ 贾宁, 蒋高芳 . (2016). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻的心理现实性及双向映射. 心理发展与教育, 32(2), 158-165.] | |
[18] | Jin H., & Huang X. T . (2012). A new issue in the study of the spatial metaphor of time: The left-and-right representation of time. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(9), 1364-1371. |
[ 金泓, 黄希庭 . (2012). 时空隐喻研究的新问题: 时间表征的左右方向性. 心理科学进展, 20(9), 1364-1371.] | |
[19] | Lakoff G., & Johnson M . (Eds). (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
[20] | Lakoff G., & Johnson M . (Eds). (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. |
[21] | Lee S. W. S., & Schwarz N . (2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 737-749. |
[22] | Li, J. X., & Wang, Z. H . (2015). Spatial-temporal association of response codes effect: Manifestation, influencing factors and its theories. Advances in Psychological Science, 23(1), 30-40. |
[ 李金星, 王振宏 . (2015). 空间-时间联合编码效应:表现、影响因素及其理论. 心理科学进展, 23(1), 30-40.] | |
[23] | Li, Y. Zhang, C., & Wang Y . (2019). The effect of moral emotions on the metaphorical mapping of morality and its neural mechanism. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(7), 1224-1231. |
[ 李莹, 张灿, 王悦 . (2019). 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制. 心理科学进展, 27(7), 1224-1231.] | |
[24] | Liljenquist K., Zhong C. B., & Galinsky A. D . (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21(3), 381-383. |
[25] | Liu W. J., Shen M. Q., Li Y., & Wang R. M . (2016). The interaction between emotional concept processing and emotional face perception. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(2), 163-173. |
[ 刘文娟, 沈曼琼, 李莹, 王瑞明 . (2016). 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响. 心理学报, 48(2), 163-173.] | |
[26] | Lu Z. Y., Guo S. P., & Jiang Z. L . (2017). The size metaphor of moral concepts: Psychological reality and mapping relationship. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), 49(2), 70-78. |
[ 鲁忠义, 郭少鹏, 蒋泽亮 . (2017). 道德概念大小隐喻的心理现实性及映射关系. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 49(2), 70-78.] | |
[27] | Lu Z. Y., Jia L. L., & Zhai D. X . (2017). The mapping for vertical spatial metaphor of the moral concepts: Bidirectional and unbalanced. ActaPsychologica Sinica, 49(2), 186-196. |
[ 鲁忠义, 贾利宁, 翟冬雪 . (2017). 道德概念垂直空间隐喻理解中的映射:双向性及不平衡性. 心理学报, 49(2), 186-196.] | |
[28] | Meier B. P., Sellbom M., & Wygant D. B . (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 757-767. |
[29] | Mills M., Boychuk P., Chasteen A. L., & Pratt J . (2017). Attention goes both ways: Shifting attention influences lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 147(2), 282-291. |
[30] | Mills M., Smith K. B., Hibbing J. R., & Dodd M. D . (2015). Obama cares about visuo-spatial attention: Perception of political figures moves attention and determines gaze direction. Behavioural Brain Research, 278, 221-225. |
[31] | Seidenberg M. S. (2011). Reading in different writing systems: One architecture, multiple solutions. In P. McCardle, J. Ren, & O. Tzeng (Eds.), Dyslexia across language: Orthography and the gene-brain-behavior link (pp. 151-174). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brooke Publishing. |
[32] | Sherman G. D., & Clore G. L . (2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20(8), 1019-1025. |
[33] | Wang X. J . (2004). Complexity of relationship between language and culture from the point of right and left. Journal of Xinjiang University (Social Science Edition), 32(2), 125-130. |
[ 王希杰 . (2004). 就左和右说语言和文化关系的复杂性. 新疆大学学报(社会科学版), 32(2), 125-130.] | |
[34] | Wang Z., & Lu Z. Y . (2013). The vertical spatial metaphor of moral concepts and its influence on cognition. ActaPsychologica Sinica, 45 (5), 538-545. |
[ 王锃, 鲁忠义 . (2013). 道德概念的垂直空间隐喻及其对认知的影响. 心理学报, 45(5), 538-545.] | |
[35] | Williams L. E., Huang J. Y., & Bargh J. A . (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257-1267. |
[36] | Wilson M . (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636. |
[37] | Yan S. C . (2011). Physical cleanliness and morality. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(8), 1242-1248. |
[ 阎书昌 . (2011). 身体洁净与道德. 心理科学进展, 19(8), 1242-1248.] | |
[38] | Yang J. P., Guo X. M., &Wang X. C . Metaphorical representation of moral concepts: Evidence from red/white color, left/right position and upright/skew font. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(7), 875-885. |
[ 杨继平, 郭秀梅, 王兴超 . (2017). 道德概念的隐喻表征——从红白颜色、左右位置和正斜字体的维度. 心理学报, 49(7), 875-885.] | |
[39] | Ye H. S. (Ed). (2017). Principles and applications of embodied cognition. Beijing, China : The Commercial Press. |
[ 叶浩生 (编).(2017). 具身认知的原理与应用. 北京: 商务印书馆.] | |
[40] | Yin R., & Ye H. S . (2014). The black and white metaphor representation of moral concepts and its influence on moral cognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46 (9), 1331-1346. |
[ 殷融, 叶浩生 . (2014). 道德概念的黑白隐喻表征及其对道德认知的影响. 心理学报, 46(9), 1331-1346.] | |
[41] | Yin R., Su D. Q., & Ye H. S . (2013). Conceptual metaphor theory: Basing on theories of embodied cognition. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(2), 220-234. |
[ 殷融, 苏得权, 叶浩生 . (2013). 具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论. 心理科学进展, 21(2), 220-234.] | |
[42] | Yu N., Wang, T F., & He Y. L . (2016). Spatial subsystem of moral metaphors: A cognitive semantic study. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(4), 195-211. |
[43] | Zhai D. X., Guo Y. L., & Lu, Z Y . (2018). A dual mechanism of cognition and emotion in processing moral-vertical metaphors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(8), 1-9. |
[44] | Zhong, C B., Strejcek B., & Sivanathan N . (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 859-862. |
相关文章 15
[1] | 李芮, 夏凌翔. 攻击动机对特质愤怒与反应性攻击关系的中介作用:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 788-797. |
[2] | 王丛兴, 杨玉琴, 熊猛, 叶一舵. 特征整合与加工深度对道德概念容器隐喻联结的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(2): 139-154. |
[3] | 崔芳, 杨佳苗, 古若雷, 刘洁. 右侧颞顶联合区及道德加工脑网络的功能连接预测社会性框架效应:来自静息态功能磁共振的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 55-66. |
[4] | 张积家,付雅,王斌. 文化影响亲属词性别概念加工中的空间隐喻与重量隐喻——来自彝族、白族和摩梭人的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 440-455. |
[5] | 王汉林, 蒋泽亮, 冯晓慧, 鲁忠义. 道德概念的空间形象性:语言因素和具身因素的共同作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 128-138. |
[6] | 贺晓玲, 陈俊. 3~5岁幼儿权力概念多重隐喻的认知发展[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 149-161. |
[7] | 樊亚凤,蒋晶,崔稳权. 网络公益平台默认选项设置对个人捐赠意愿的影响及作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 415-427. |
[8] | 耿晓伟,房津如,韩彦芳,李中权,赵蜜,杨烨. 道德相对主义和厌恶情绪对道德直觉判断的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 517-526. |
[9] | 马利军,马云霄,何晓清,刘海涛,张静宇. 相对熟悉度和同音线索在谐音型歇后语理解中的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(12): 1306-1317. |
[10] | 陈斯允,卫海英,孟陆. 社会知觉视角下道德诉求方式如何提升劝捐效果[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(12): 1351-1362. |
[11] | 吕小康, 付春野, 汪新建. 反驳文本对患方信任和道德判断的影响与机制[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(10): 1171-1186. |
[12] | 黎晓丹,丁道群,叶浩生. 身体姿势启动的内隐权力感对公平决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 106-116. |
[13] | 汪新筱, 江珊, 张积家. 空间语言标记影响亲属关系的容器隐喻 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 953-964. |
[14] | 金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 乌云特娜, 金祥忠. 暴力环境接触对大学生网络攻击行为的影响:反刍思维与网络道德的作用 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 1051-1060. |
[15] | 易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生. 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 793-802. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4683