data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1 深圳大学教育学部心理学院
2 深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室
3 深圳市神经科学研究院, 深圳 518060
收稿日期:
2018-03-14出版日期:
2019-06-25发布日期:
2019-04-25通讯作者:
王超E-mail:wang@szu.edu.cn基金资助:
* 广东省普通高校创新团队建设项目(2015KCXTD009);广东省省级(基础研究与应用研究)重大项目(2016KZDXM009);国家自然科学基金项目(31600920);深圳市基础研究布局项目(JCYJ20150729104249783);深圳市孔雀计划项目(KQTD2015033016104926);深圳市自由探索项目资助(JCYJ20170818102123707)Emotional regulation goals of young adults with depression inclination: An event-related potential study
LI Hong1,2,3, YANG Xiaoguang1,2, ZHENG Wenyu1,2, WANG Chao1,2(data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1 School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Affective and Social Cognitive Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
3 Shenzhen Institute of Neuroscience, Shenzhen 518060, China
Received:
2018-03-14Online:
2019-06-25Published:
2019-04-25Contact:
WANG Chao E-mail:wang@szu.edu.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要: 目前抑郁症情绪失调的研究主要关注策略的选择和应用, 但是对于情绪调节目标是否异常及其背后的电生理基础尚不清楚。情景选择是成熟的情绪反应产生之前运用的一种调节策略, 可以反映情绪调节目标。本研究要求抑郁倾向被试与控制组被试观看并选择快乐、中性和悲伤场景图片, 同时记录事件相关电位(ERP)和主观情绪偏好。结果发现, 抑郁倾向组悲伤图片的LPP波幅显著小于健康控制组, 并更多地选择再次观看悲伤图片。此外, 抑郁倾向组对于悲伤情绪的偏好显著增加, 对快乐情绪的偏好则显著降低。结果提示抑郁倾向个体对快乐刺激的趋近动机和对悲伤刺激的回避动机都降低, 从而使得抑郁倾向被试的情绪调节目标为更多地体验到悲伤。
图/表 9
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30054/30054127aee39df09824c02e32d5bc5f8be68235" alt=""
图1图片选择流程图
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30054/30054127aee39df09824c02e32d5bc5f8be68235" alt=""
表1被试的人口学信息和临床特征
项目名称 | 健康控制组 | 抑郁倾向组 | p值 |
---|---|---|---|
N | 18 | 18 | |
性别(男/女) | 10/8 | 8/10 | 0.53a |
年龄 | 20.78 (1.86) | 20.56 (1.98) | 0.73b |
BDI-II | 5.22 (3.08) | 25.11 (4.05) | < 0.001 b |
PANAS | |||
正性情绪 | 20.33 ± 6.29 | 19.77 ± 7.46 | 0.239 b |
负性情绪 | 11.38 ± 4.09 | 12.72 ± 2.35 | 0.811 b |
表1被试的人口学信息和临床特征
项目名称 | 健康控制组 | 抑郁倾向组 | p值 |
---|---|---|---|
N | 18 | 18 | |
性别(男/女) | 10/8 | 8/10 | 0.53a |
年龄 | 20.78 (1.86) | 20.56 (1.98) | 0.73b |
BDI-II | 5.22 (3.08) | 25.11 (4.05) | < 0.001 b |
PANAS | |||
正性情绪 | 20.33 ± 6.29 | 19.77 ± 7.46 | 0.239 b |
负性情绪 | 11.38 ± 4.09 | 12.72 ± 2.35 | 0.811 b |
表2两组被试对三种图片的情绪反应
组别 | 图片类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
快乐的 | 中性的 | 悲伤的 | |
抑郁倾向组 | |||
快乐 | 5.32 (1.69) | 2.07 (1.05) | 1.40 (0.46) |
悲伤 | 1.43 (0.38) | 1.66 (0.77) | 5.41 (1.79) |
健康控制组 | |||
快乐 | 5.92 (1.39) | 2.26 (1.04) | 1.24 (0.16) |
悲伤 | 1.22 (0.27) | 1.51 (0.70) | 5.43 (1.47) |
表2两组被试对三种图片的情绪反应
组别 | 图片类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
快乐的 | 中性的 | 悲伤的 | |
抑郁倾向组 | |||
快乐 | 5.32 (1.69) | 2.07 (1.05) | 1.40 (0.46) |
悲伤 | 1.43 (0.38) | 1.66 (0.77) | 5.41 (1.79) |
健康控制组 | |||
快乐 | 5.92 (1.39) | 2.26 (1.04) | 1.24 (0.16) |
悲伤 | 1.22 (0.27) | 1.51 (0.70) | 5.43 (1.47) |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81a9b/81a9b1d48c6d0ab2a2513a8bc03a4aec1a868ea5" alt=""
图2两组被试对三种图片(快乐、中性和悲伤)的选择, 纵轴表示被试选择再看一遍的图片数量。*表示p < 0.05。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81a9b/81a9b1d48c6d0ab2a2513a8bc03a4aec1a868ea5" alt=""
表3两组被试对三种图片的选择
组别 | 图片类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
快乐图片 | 中性图片 | 悲伤图片 | |
健康控制组 | 45.50 (13.86) | 31.83 (15.56) | 12.39 (10.41) |
抑郁倾向组 | 37.39 (14.60) | 28.33 (12.11) | 23.22 (11.56) |
总计 | 41.44 (14.62) | 30.08 (13.85) | 17.81 (12.16) |
表3两组被试对三种图片的选择
组别 | 图片类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
快乐图片 | 中性图片 | 悲伤图片 | |
健康控制组 | 45.50 (13.86) | 31.83 (15.56) | 12.39 (10.41) |
抑郁倾向组 | 37.39 (14.60) | 28.33 (12.11) | 23.22 (11.56) |
总计 | 41.44 (14.62) | 30.08 (13.85) | 17.81 (12.16) |
表4主要变量的描述统计及变量间Pearson相关
变量 | M | SD | 相关 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |||
1. 对快乐的偏好 | 5.19 | 1.03 | — | ||
2. 对悲伤的偏好 | 2.31 | 0.95 | -0.38* | — | |
3. 被选的快乐图片数量 | 41.44 | 14.63 | 0.48** | -0.27 | — |
4. 被选的悲伤图片数量 | 17.81 | 12.16 | -0.37* | 0.47** | -0.29 |
表4主要变量的描述统计及变量间Pearson相关
变量 | M | SD | 相关 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |||
1. 对快乐的偏好 | 5.19 | 1.03 | — | ||
2. 对悲伤的偏好 | 2.31 | 0.95 | -0.38* | — | |
3. 被选的快乐图片数量 | 41.44 | 14.63 | 0.48** | -0.27 | — |
4. 被选的悲伤图片数量 | 17.81 | 12.16 | -0.37* | 0.47** | -0.29 |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecdbf/ecdbf180f459a8ca54496f1670ca003cdd478965" alt=""
图3A, B表示两组被试在POz电极点上对三种图片的P2的ERP总平均图, A表示健康控制组, B表示抑郁倾向组。P2成分时间窗为180~230 ms。C, D表示两组被试在FCz电极点上对三种图片的N2的ERP总平均图, C表示健康控制组, D表示抑郁倾向组。N2成分时间窗为200~300 ms。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecdbf/ecdbf180f459a8ca54496f1670ca003cdd478965" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31e1e/31e1e642ff8c740af79dd1f30ae9806b6315b9e7" alt=""
图4两组被试在CPz电极点上对三种图片的LPP的ERP总平均图, 其中左侧(A)表示健康控制组, 右侧(B)表示抑郁倾向组。LPP成分时间窗为600~1200 ms。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31e1e/31e1e642ff8c740af79dd1f30ae9806b6315b9e7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/440c6/440c61bb39acd59d51a3e198b14978633799778f" alt=""
图5两组被试在CPz电极点上对三种类型的图片的LPP波幅
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/440c6/440c61bb39acd59d51a3e198b14978633799778f" alt=""
参考文献 48
[1] | Admon R .,& Pizzagalli, D. A .( 2015). Dysfunctional reward processing in depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 4, 114-118. |
[2] | Aldao A ., Nolen-hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S .( 2010). Emotion- regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30 (2).217-237. |
[3] | Bai L., Ma H., Huang Y.-X., & Luo Y. J . ( 2005). The development of native chinese affective picture system--A pretest in 46 college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19( 11), 719-722. |
[ 白露, 马慧, 黄宇霞, 罗跃嘉 .( 2005). 中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用. 中国心理卫生杂志, 19( 11), 719-722.] doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6729.2005.11.001URL | |
[4] | Bamford, S., & Ward , R. ( 2008). Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 8( 2), 174-183. |
[5] | Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., & Vohs K. D . ( 2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5( 4), 323-370. 4. 323 |
[6] | Briggs K. E .,& Martin, F. H. ( 2009a). Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: Arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72(4), 299-306. |
[7] | Briggs K. E .,& Martin, F. H.( 2009b). Affective picture processing and motivational relevance: Arousal and valence effects on ERPs in an oddball task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72(3), 299-306. |
[8] | Carretié L., Hinojosa J. A., Martín-Loeches M., Mercado F., & Tapia M . ( 2004). Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: Neural correlates. Human Brain Mapping, 22( 4), 290-299. |
[9] | Carretié L., Mercado F., Hinojosa J. A., Martín-Loeches M., & Sotillo M . ( 2004). Valence-related vigilance biases in anxiety studied through event-related potentials. Journal of Affective Disorders, 78( 2), 119-130. |
[10] | Codispoti M., Ferrari V .,& Bradley, M. M.( 2006). Repetitive picture processing: Autonomic and cortical correlates. Brain Research, 1068( 1), 213-220. |
[11] | Cuthbert B. N., Schupp H. T., Bradley M. M., Birbaumer N., & Lang P. J . ( 2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 1068( 2), 95-111. |
[12] | Dennis T. A., & Hajcak G. , ( 2009). The late positive potential: A neurophysiological marker for emotion regulation in children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 50( 11), 1373-1383. |
[13] | Ehring T., Tuschen-Caffier B., Schnülle J., Fischer S., & Gross J. J . ( 2010). Emotion regulation and vulnerability to depression: Spontaneous versus instructed use of emotion suppression and reappraisal. Emotion, 10( 4), 563-572. |
[14] | Elliot A. J., Thrash T. M . ( 2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804-818. |
[15] | Feng C., Li W., Tian T., Luo Y., Gu R., Zhou C .,& Luo, Y.-J.( 2014). Arousal modulates valence effects on both early and late stages of affective picture processing in a passive viewing task. Social Neuroscience, 9(4), 364-377. |
[16] | Gable P. A., & Harmon-Jones E. ,( 2013). Does arousal per se account for the influence of appetitive stimuli on attentional scope and the late positive potential? Psychophysiology, 20(4), 344-350. |
[17] | Gable P. A., Poole B. D . ( 2014). Influence of trait behavioral inhibition and behavioral approach motivation systems on the LPP and frontal asymmetry to anger pictures. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9( 2), 182-190. |
[18] | Garnefski N .,& Kraaij, V.( 2006). Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: A comparative study of five specific samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1659-1669. |
[19] | Gross J. J . ( 1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2( 3), 271-299. |
[20] | Gross J. J .( 2015). The extended process model of mmotion regulation: Elaborations, applications, and future directions. Psychological Inquiry, 26( 1), 130-137. |
[21] | Hajcak G., MacNamara A., & Olvet D. M . ( 2010). Event- related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: An integrative review. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35( 2), 129-155. |
[22] | Harmon-Jones E., Harmon-Jones C., Amodio D. M., & Gable P. A . ( 2011). Attitudes toward emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101( 6), 1332-1350. |
[23] | Ito T. A., Larsen J. T., Smith N. K., & Cacioppo J. T . ( 1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75( 4), 887-900. |
[24] | Joormann J., & Gotlib I. H . ( 2010). Emotion regulation in depression: Relation to cognitive inhibition. Cognition & Emotion, 24( 2), 281-298. |
[25] | Krendl A. C., Zucker H. R., & Kensinger E. A . ( 2017). Examining the effects of emotion regulation on the ERP response to highly negative social stigmas. Social Neuroscience, 12( 3), 349-360. |
[26] | Lang P. J., Bradley M. M., & Cuthbert B. N . ( 1997). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 39-58. |
[27] | Lang P. J .,& Bradley, M. M.( 2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 437-450. |
[28] | Leutgeb V., Schäfer A .,& Schienle, A.( 2009). An event- related potential study on exposure therapy for patients suffering from spider phobia. Biological Psychology, 82(3), 293-300. |
[29] | Lewis M. D., Granic I., Lamm C., Zelazo P. D., Stieben J., Todd R. M., … Pepler D . ( 2008). Changes in the neural bases of emotion regulation associated with clinical improvement in children with behavior problems. Development and Psychopathology, 20( 3), 913-939. |
[30] | MacNamara A., Kotov R., & Hajcak G . ( 2016). Diagnostic and symptom-based predictors of emotional processing in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder: An event-related potential study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40( 3), 275-289. |
[31] | Michalowski J. M., Melzig C. A., Weike A. I., Stockburger J., Schupp H. T., & Hamm A. O . ( 2009). Brain dynamics in spider-phobic individuals exposed to phobia-relevant and other emotional stimuli. Emotion, 9( 3), 306-315. |
[32] | Millgram Y., Joormann J., Huppert J. D., & Tamir M . ( 2015). Sad as a matter of choice? Emotion-regulation goals in depression. Psychological Science, 26( 8), 1216-28.https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615583295 |
[33] | Neumann R., & Strack F. , ( 2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79( 1), 39-48. |
[34] | Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., van den Wildenberg W., & Ridderinkhof K. R . ( 2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3( 1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.1.17 doi: 10.3758/CABN.3.1.17URLpmid: 12822595 |
[35] | Öhman A., & Mineka S. , ( 2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108( 3), 483-522. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.483 doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.108.3.483URLpmid: 11488376 |
[36] | Olofsson J. K., Nordin S., Sequeira H., & Polich J . ( 2008). Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings. Biological Psychology, 77( 3), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006 |
[37] | Pastor M. C., Bradley M. M., Löw A., Versace F., Moltó J .,& Lang, P. J.( 2008). Affective picture perception: Emotion, context, and the late positive potential. Brain Research, 1189 2007. 10. 072 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.072URLpmid: 18068150 |
[38] | Proudfit G. H., Bress J. N., Foti D., Kujawa A .,& Klein, D. N.( 2015). Depression and event-related potentials: Emotional disengagement and reward insensitivity. Current Opinion in Psychology, 4, 110-113. |
[39] | Schupp H., Cuthbert B., Bradley M., Hillman C., Hamm A., & Lang P . ( 2004). Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention. Cognition & Emotion, 18( 5), 593-611. doi: 10.1080/02699930341000239URL |
[40] | Schupp H. T., Cuthbert B. N., Bradley M. M., Cacioppo J. T., Ito T., & Lang P. J . ( 2000). Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology, 37( 2), 257-261. |
[41] | Schupp H. T., Junghöfer M., Weike A. I., & Hamm A. O . ( 2004). The selective processing of briefly presented affective pictures: An ERP analysis. Psychophysiology, 41(3), 441-449. |
[42] | Schupp H. T., Öhman A., Junghöfer M., Weike A. I., Stockburger J., & Hamm A. O . ( 2004). The facilitated processing of Threatening Faces: An ERP analysis. Emotion, 4( 2), 189-200. |
[43] | Tamir M . ( 2009). Differential preferences for happiness: Extraversion and trait-consistent emotion regulation. Journal of Personality, 77(2), 447-470. |
[44] | Tamir M., & Ford B. Q . ( 2012). When feeling bad is expected to be good: Emotion regulation and outcome expectancies in social conflicts. Emotion, 12( 4), 807-816. |
[45] | Twenge J. M., & Campbell W. K . ( 2001). Age and birth cohort differences in self-esteem: A cross-temporal meta- analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 321-344. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_3URL |
[46] | Weinberg A., & Hajcak G. , ( 2010). Beyond good and evil: The time-course of neural activity elicited by specific picture content. Emotion, 10( 6), 767-782. |
[47] | Weinberg A., Perlman G., Kotov R., & Hajcak G . ( 2016). Depression and reduced neural response to emotional images: Distinction from anxiety, and importance of symptom dimensions and age of onset. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125( 1), 26-39. |
[48] | Yang W., Zhu X., Wang X., Wu D .,& Yao, S.( 2011). Time course of affective processing bias in major depression: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 47(3), 372-377. |
相关文章 15
[1] | 程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. 愤怒情绪对恶意创造力的影响及调节策略[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 847-860. |
[2] | 袁加锦, 张祎程, 陈圣栋, 罗利, 茹怡珊. 中国情绪调节词语库的初步编制与试用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 445-455. |
[3] | 莫李澄, 郭田友, 张岳瑶, 徐锋, 张丹丹. 激活右腹外侧前额叶提高抑郁症患者对社会疼痛的情绪调节能力:一项TMS研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 494-504. |
[4] | 华艳, 李明霞, 王巧婷, 冯彩霞, 张晶. 左侧眶额皮层在自动情绪调节下注意选择中的作用:来自经颅直流电刺激的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1048-1056. |
[5] | 孙岩, 吕娇娇, 兰帆, 张丽娜. 自我关注重评和情境关注重评情绪调节策略及对随后认知控制的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(12): 1393-1406. |
[6] | 孙岩, 薄思雨, 吕娇娇. 认知重评和表达抑制情绪调节策略的脑网络分析:来自EEG和ERP的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(1): 12-25. |
[7] | 孙俊才,寻凤娇,刘萍,张文海. 高善良特质在情绪调节行动控制中的内隐优势[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(7): 781-794. |
[8] | 彭婉晴,罗帏,周仁来. 工作记忆刷新训练改善抑郁倾向大学生情绪调节能力的HRV证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(6): 648-661. |
[9] | 张丹丹, 刘珍莉, 陈钰, 买晓琴. 右腹外侧前额叶对高抑郁水平成年人社会情绪调节的作用:一项tDCS研究[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(2): 207-2015. |
[10] | 叶婉青, 李晓彤, 王大华. 老年人对夫妻间负性事件的认知性情绪调节策略及其与婚姻满意度的关系:交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 426-435. |
[11] | 吕梦思, 席居哲, 罗一睿. 不同心理弹性者的日常情绪特征: 结合体验采样研究的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(7): 928-940. |
[12] | 赵庆柏;柯娓;童彪;周治金; 周宗奎. 网络语言的创造性加工过程:新颖N400与LPC[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 143-154. |
[13] | 赵庆柏, 魏琳琳, 李瑛, 周治金, 赵黎莉, 唐磊. 新颖语义联结形成的右半球优势效应[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(11): 1370-1382. |
[14] | 周宵;伍新春;曾旻;田雨馨. 青少年的情绪调节策略对创伤后应激障碍和创伤后成长的影响:社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 969-980. |
[15] | 蔡阿燕;杨洁敏;许爽;袁加锦. 表达抑制调节负性情绪的男性优势 ——来自事件相关电位的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 482-494. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4452