删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

面孔吸引力和信息正确性对幼儿选择性信任的影响

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

唐卫海, 钟汝波, 许晓旭, 刘希平*
天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津 300387
收稿日期:2017-05-02出版日期:2019-01-25发布日期:2018-11-26
通讯作者:刘希平

基金资助:* 天津市哲学社会科学规划课题资助(TJJX15-017);天津师范大学培育国家社科重大招标项目专项基金资助(2017)

Effects of facial attractiveness and information accuracy on preschoolers’ selective trust

TANG Weihai, ZHONG Rubo, XU Xiaoxu, LIU Xiping*
School of Educational Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
Received:2017-05-02Online:2019-01-25Published:2018-11-26
Contact:LIU Xiping






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 实验1采用3×2×2 的混合设计, 考察4~6岁幼儿获取全新信息时基于面孔吸引力的选择性信任及其特点。结果显示:(1) 4~6岁的男孩和女孩均表现出对高面孔吸引力者的选择性信任。(2)在选择性信任程度方面:5岁比4岁高, 而4岁和6岁之间、5岁和6岁之间则相同; 女孩在询问任务中比男孩表现出更高的选择性信任, 在赞同任务中则相同。那么, 幼儿的这种选择性信任是否受到信息正确性的调节?为此, 实验2采用2×3的被试间设计, 探讨信息提供者提供信息的正确性对4~6岁幼儿基于面孔吸引力的选择性信任的影响。结果显示:在正确性为50% vs. 50%条件下, 幼儿未对信息提供者产生选择性信任; 在正确性为25% vs. 75%条件下, 幼儿对提供较大正确性信息的低面孔吸引力者产生了选择性信任。研究结果表明:(1)在信息缺乏时, 4~6岁幼儿普遍存在有偏见的选择性信任; 女孩比男孩更易受到社会偏见因素的影响。(2)在信息明确时, 4~6岁幼儿也能做出相对理性的选择性信任。


表1被试基本信息
年龄 性别 人数(n) 月龄 月龄范围
M SD 最小值 最大值
4岁 男 33 54.24 2.16 52.08 56.40
女 30 55.20 1.80 53.40 57.00
5岁 男 33 65.16 2.88 62.28 68.04
女 33 66.12 2.64 63.48 68.76
6岁 男 33 77.88 2.04 75.84 79.92
女 33 78.24 2.04 76.20 80.28

表1被试基本信息
年龄 性别 人数(n) 月龄 月龄范围
M SD 最小值 最大值
4岁 男 33 54.24 2.16 52.08 56.40
女 30 55.20 1.80 53.40 57.00
5岁 男 33 65.16 2.88 62.28 68.04
女 33 66.12 2.64 63.48 68.76
6岁 男 33 77.88 2.04 75.84 79.92
女 33 78.24 2.04 76.20 80.28


表24~6岁幼儿的询问率和赞同率与随机水平的比较
年龄 性别(n) 询问率(M ± SD) t d 赞同率(M ± SD) t d
4岁 男(33) 0.61 ± 0.28 2.21* 0.39 0.61 ± 0.28 2.17* 0.39
女(30) 0.71 ± 0.23 4.98*** 0.91 0.65 ± 0.28 3.03** 0.54
总计(63) 0.65 ± 0.26 4.75*** 0.58 0.63 ± 0.28 3.67*** 0.46
5岁 男(33) 0.77 ± 0.21 7.49*** 1.29 0.68 ± 0.23 4.63*** 0.78
女(33) 0.85 ± 0.21 9.53*** 1.67 0.72 ± 0.26 4.76*** 0.85
总计(66) 0.81 ± 0.21 11.90*** 1.48 0.7 ± 0.24 6.67*** 0.83
6岁 男(33) 0.66 ± 0.24 3.81*** 0.67 0.65 ± 0.21 4.13*** 0.71
女(33) 0.83 ± 0.25 7.73*** 1.32 0.7 ± 0.23 4.92*** 0.87
总计(66) 0.75 ± 0.26 7.77*** 0.96 0.67 ± 0.22 6.44*** 0.77

表24~6岁幼儿的询问率和赞同率与随机水平的比较
年龄 性别(n) 询问率(M ± SD) t d 赞同率(M ± SD) t d
4岁 男(33) 0.61 ± 0.28 2.21* 0.39 0.61 ± 0.28 2.17* 0.39
女(30) 0.71 ± 0.23 4.98*** 0.91 0.65 ± 0.28 3.03** 0.54
总计(63) 0.65 ± 0.26 4.75*** 0.58 0.63 ± 0.28 3.67*** 0.46
5岁 男(33) 0.77 ± 0.21 7.49*** 1.29 0.68 ± 0.23 4.63*** 0.78
女(33) 0.85 ± 0.21 9.53*** 1.67 0.72 ± 0.26 4.76*** 0.85
总计(66) 0.81 ± 0.21 11.90*** 1.48 0.7 ± 0.24 6.67*** 0.83
6岁 男(33) 0.66 ± 0.24 3.81*** 0.67 0.65 ± 0.21 4.13*** 0.71
女(33) 0.83 ± 0.25 7.73*** 1.32 0.7 ± 0.23 4.92*** 0.87
总计(66) 0.75 ± 0.26 7.77*** 0.96 0.67 ± 0.22 6.44*** 0.77


表34~6岁幼儿的询问量和赞同量(M ± SD)
年龄 性别(n) 询问量 赞同量
4岁 男(33) 0.11 ± 0.28 0.11 ± 0.28
女(30) 0.21 ± 0.23 0.15 ± 0.28
5岁 男(33) 0.27 ± 0.21 0.18 ± 0.23
女(33) 0.35 ± 0.21 0.22 ± 0.26
6岁 男(33) 0.16 ± 0.24 0.15 ± 0.21
女(33) 0.33 ± 0.25 0.20 ± 0.23

表34~6岁幼儿的询问量和赞同量(M ± SD)
年龄 性别(n) 询问量 赞同量
4岁 男(33) 0.11 ± 0.28 0.11 ± 0.28
女(30) 0.21 ± 0.23 0.15 ± 0.28
5岁 男(33) 0.27 ± 0.21 0.18 ± 0.23
女(33) 0.35 ± 0.21 0.22 ± 0.26
6岁 男(33) 0.16 ± 0.24 0.15 ± 0.21
女(33) 0.33 ± 0.25 0.20 ± 0.23



图1性别和任务类型的交互作用
图1性别和任务类型的交互作用


表4被试基本信息
年龄 性别 人数(n1, n2) 正确性为50% vs. 50% 正确性为25% vs. 75%
月龄 月龄范围 月龄 月龄范围
M SD 最小值 最大值 M SD 最小值 最大值
4岁 男 (14, 15) 54.66 4.10 50.56 58.76 54.05 3.33 50.72 57.38
女 (20, 13) 55.93 1.92 54.01 57.85 55.29 1.58 53.71 56.87
5岁 男 (16, 16) 68.75 2.76 65.99 71.51 64.81 3.53 61.28 68.34
女 (15, 12) 66.75 3.07 63.68 69.82 64.59 3.29 61.30 67.88
6岁 男 (15, 14) 77.71 1.78 75.93 79.49 78.6 1.49 77.11 80.09
女 (12, 15) 77.38 2.15 75.23 79.53 77.8 1.79 76.01 79.59

表4被试基本信息
年龄 性别 人数(n1, n2) 正确性为50% vs. 50% 正确性为25% vs. 75%
月龄 月龄范围 月龄 月龄范围
M SD 最小值 最大值 M SD 最小值 最大值
4岁 男 (14, 15) 54.66 4.10 50.56 58.76 54.05 3.33 50.72 57.38
女 (20, 13) 55.93 1.92 54.01 57.85 55.29 1.58 53.71 56.87
5岁 男 (16, 16) 68.75 2.76 65.99 71.51 64.81 3.53 61.28 68.34
女 (15, 12) 66.75 3.07 63.68 69.82 64.59 3.29 61.30 67.88
6岁 男 (15, 14) 77.71 1.78 75.93 79.49 78.6 1.49 77.11 80.09
女 (12, 15) 77.38 2.15 75.23 79.53 77.8 1.79 76.01 79.59


表5幼儿在不同信息正确性条件下对高面孔吸引力者的询问率和赞同率(M ± SD)
年龄组(n1, n2) 正确性为50% vs. 50% 正确性为25% vs. 75%
询问率 赞同率 询问率 赞同率
4岁(34, 28) 0.61 ± 0.29 0.55 ± 0.21 0.66 ± 0.22 0.31 ± 0.33
5岁(31, 28) 0.71 ± 0.33 0.56 ± 0.27 0.72 ± 0.26 0.24 ± 0.23
6岁(27, 29) 0.80 ± 0.22 0.58 ± 0.24 0.70 ± 0.26 0.17 ± 0.17

表5幼儿在不同信息正确性条件下对高面孔吸引力者的询问率和赞同率(M ± SD)
年龄组(n1, n2) 正确性为50% vs. 50% 正确性为25% vs. 75%
询问率 赞同率 询问率 赞同率
4岁(34, 28) 0.61 ± 0.29 0.55 ± 0.21 0.66 ± 0.22 0.31 ± 0.33
5岁(31, 28) 0.71 ± 0.33 0.56 ± 0.27 0.72 ± 0.26 0.24 ± 0.23
6岁(27, 29) 0.80 ± 0.22 0.58 ± 0.24 0.70 ± 0.26 0.17 ± 0.17


表6幼儿在不同信息正确性条件下的选择性信任
年龄组(n1, n2) 正确性为50% vs. 50% 正确性为25% vs. 75%
询问率 赞同率 询问率 赞同率
t d t d t d t d
4岁(34, 28) 2.24* 2.10 1.44 3.87** 0.73 -3.10** 0.58
5岁(31, 28) 3.70** 0.64 1.26 4.46*** 0.85 -5.83*** 1.13
6岁(27, 29) 7.03*** 1.36 1.70 4.22*** 0.77 -10.62*** 1.94

表6幼儿在不同信息正确性条件下的选择性信任
年龄组(n1, n2) 正确性为50% vs. 50% 正确性为25% vs. 75%
询问率 赞同率 询问率 赞同率
t d t d t d t d
4岁(34, 28) 2.24* 2.10 1.44 3.87** 0.73 -3.10** 0.58
5岁(31, 28) 3.70** 0.64 1.26 4.46*** 0.85 -5.83*** 1.13
6岁(27, 29) 7.03*** 1.36 1.70 4.22*** 0.77 -10.62*** 1.94


表7幼儿对高面孔吸引力者选择性信任程度
年龄组 正确性为50% vs. 50% 正确性为25% vs. 75%
n M SD n M SD
4岁 34 0.11 0.29 28 0.16 0.22
5岁 31 0.22 0.33 28 0.22 0.26
6岁 27 0.21 0.29 29 0.20 0.26

表7幼儿对高面孔吸引力者选择性信任程度
年龄组 正确性为50% vs. 50% 正确性为25% vs. 75%
n M SD n M SD
4岁 34 0.11 0.29 28 0.16 0.22
5岁 31 0.22 0.33 28 0.22 0.26
6岁 27 0.21 0.29 29 0.20 0.26



图2幼儿基于面孔的选择性信任心理加工过程示意图
图2幼儿基于面孔的选择性信任心理加工过程示意图







[1] Bascandziev I., & Harris P.L. ( 2014). In beauty we trust: Children prefer information from more attractive informants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32( 1), 94-99.
doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12022URLpmid: 24164592
[2] Bascandziev I., & Harris P.L. ( 2016). The beautiful and the accurate: Are children’s selective trust decisions biased?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 92-105.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.017URLpmid: 27518811
[3] Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., & Vohs K. D . ( 2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5( 4), 323-370.
doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323URL
[4] Bernard S., Harris P., Terrier N., & Clément F . ( 2015). Children weigh the number of informants and perceptual uncertainty when identifying objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 136, 70-81.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.009URLpmid: 25872680
[5] Birch S. A. J., Vauthier S. A., & Bloom P . ( 2008). Three-and four-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107( 3), 1018-1034.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.008URLpmid: 18295193
[6] Boothroyd L. G., Meins E., Vukovic J., & Burt D. M . ( 2014). Developmental changes in children's facial preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35( 5), 376-383.
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.05.002URL
[7] Cao M-L., Gong W-J., & Tang Y-L . ( 2012). Impact of bystander’s non-verbal cues on preschoolers’ selective trust. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20( 5), 613-615.
[ 曹梦露, 龚文进, 汤永隆 . ( 2012). 旁观者非言语线索对幼儿选择性信任的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20( 5), 613-615.]
[8] Chan C. C.Y., & Tardif T. ,( 2013). Knowing better: The role of prior knowledge and culture in trust in testimony. Developmental Psychology, 49( 3), 591-601.
doi: 10.1037/a0031336URLpmid: 23294151
[9] Che H.B . ( 2014). The developmental characteristics of 4-to 5-year-old children’s selective trust judgment based on pro-social traits (Unpublished master’s thesis). Liaoning Normal University, China.
[ 车翰博 . ( 2014). 基于亲社会特质的4-5岁幼儿选择性信任判断的发展特点(硕士论文). 辽宁师范大学.]
[10] Clément F., Koenig M., & Harris P . ( 2004). The ontogenesis of trust. Mind and Language, 19( 4), 360-379.
[11] Cong H. Q.& Xu X. J. ( 2003). How was Testimony defended. Philosophical Researches( 10), 67-76.
[ 丛杭青, 徐献军 . ( 2003). Testimony是如何得到辩护的. 哲学研究 ( 10), 69-76.]
[12] Corriveau K. H., Harris P. L., Meins E., Fernyhough C., Arnott B., Elliott L., .. De Rosnay M . ( 2009). Young children’s trust in their mother’s claims: Longitudinal links with attachment security in infancy. Child Development, 80( 3), 750-761.
[13] Corriveau K. H., Kinzler K. D., & Harris P. L . ( 2012). Accuracy trumps accent in children's endorsement of object labels. Developmental Psychology, 49( 3), 470-479.
doi: 10.1037/a0030604URLpmid: 23231692
[14] Ding X.C . ( 2016). Preschoolers’ selective trust in informants (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). East China Normal University, Shang Hai.
[ 丁雪辰 . ( 2016). 幼儿对信息提供者的选择性信任研究(博士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.]
[15] Dion K.K . ( 1973). Young children's stereotyping of facial attractiveness. Developmental Psychology, 9( 2), 183-188.
doi: 10.1037/h0035083URL
[16] Doebel S., & Koenig M.A. ( 2013). Children's use of moral behavior in selective trust: Discrimination versus learning. Developmental Psychology, 49( 3), 462-469.
doi: 10.1037/a0031595URLpmid: 23356525
[17] Eagly A. H., Ashmore R. D., Makhijani M. G., & Longo L. C . ( 1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110( 1), 109-128.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109URL
[18] Ellsberg D.., ( 1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75( 4), 643-669.
doi: 10.2307/1884324URL
[19] Feingold A.., ( 1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111( 2), 304-341.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304URL
[20] Harris P. L., Corriveau K. H., Pasquini E. S., Koenig M., Fusaro M., & Clément F . ( 2012). Credulity and the development of selective trust in early childhood. Foundations of Metacognition, 193-210.
[21] Hertz-Lazarowitz R., Feitelson D., Zahavi S., & Hartup W. W . ( 1981). Social interaction and social organization of Israeli five to seven-year-olds. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 4( 2), 143-155.
doi: 10.1177/016502548100400201URL
[22] Horst J.S., & Hout M.C . ( 2016). The novel object and unusual name (NOUN) database: A collection of novel images for use in experimental research. Behavior Research Methods. 48( 4), 1393-1409.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0647-3URLpmid: 26424438
[23] Jackson L. A., Hunter J. E., & Hodge C. N . ( 1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58( 2), 108-122.
doi: 10.2307/2787149URL
[24] Jaffer S.& Ma L. , ( 2015). Preschoolers show less trust in physically disabled or obese informants. Frontiers in Psychology, 5( 10), 1524.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01524URLpmid: 25610413
[25] Jaswal V.K . ( 2004). Don't believe everything you hear: Preschoolers' sensitivity to speaker intent in category induction. Child Development, 75( 6), 1871-1885.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00822.xURLpmid: 15566385
[26] Jaswal V.K . ( 2006). Preschoolers favor the creator's label when reasoning about an artifact's function. Cognition, 99( 3), B83-B92.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.006URLpmid: 16185679
[27] Jaswal V.K., & Markman E.M . ( 2007). Looks aren't everything: 24-month-olds' willingness to accept unexpected labels. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8( 1), 93-111.
doi: 10.1080/15248370709336995URL
[28] Jaswal V.K.&, Neely L.A, 2006). Adults don't always know best preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science, 17( 9), 757-758.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01778.xURL
[29] Kinzler K. D., Corriveau K. H., & Harris P. L . ( 2011). Children’s selective trust in native-accented speakers. Developmental Science, 14( 1), 106-111.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00965.xURL
[30] Koenig M. A., Clément F., & Harris P. L . ( 2004). Trust in testimony: Children's use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15( 10), 694-698.
doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00742.xURLpmid: 15447641
[31] Koenig M.A.&, Harris P.L, 2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76( 6), 1261-1277.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849.xURLpmid: 16274439
[32] Koenig M.A.&, Jaswal V.K, 2011). Characterizing children’s expectations about expertise and incompetence: Halo or pitchfork effects? Child Development, 82( 5), 1634-1647.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01618.xURL
[33] Koenig M.A.&, Woodward A.L, 2010). Sensitivity of 24- month-olds to the prior inaccuracy of the source: Possible mechanisms. Developmental Psychology, 46( 4), 815-26.
doi: 10.1037/a0019664URLpmid: 20604604
[34] Kushnir T., Vredenburgh C., & Schneider L. A . ( 2013). "Who can help me fix this toy?" The distinction between causal knowledge and word knowledge guides preschoolers' selective requests for information. Developmental Psychology, 49( 3), 446-453.
doi: 10.1037/a0031649URLpmid: 23339590
[35] Langlois J. H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A. J., Larson A., Hallam M., & Smoot M . ( 2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126( 3), 390-423.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390URL
[36] Li D.Ed). ( 1987) . Childhood developmental psychology. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
[ 李丹 . (主编).( 1987). 儿童发展心理学. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.]
[37] Li Q-G., Heyman G. D., Xu F., & Lee K . ( 2014). Young children’s use of honesty as a basis for selective trust. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 117, 59-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.002URLpmid: 24149377
[38] Liu D., Vanderbilt K. E., & Heyman G. D . ( 2013). Selective trust: Children's use of intention and outcome of past testimony. Developmental Psychology, 49( 3), 439-445.
doi: 10.1037/a0031615URLpmid: 23339589
[39] Liu J.M., & Yin G. E . ( 2001). Review on the development of children's classification. Psychological Science, 24( 6), 707-709.
[ 刘金明, 阴国恩 . ( 2001). 儿童分类发展研究综述. 心理科学, 24( 6), 707-709.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2001.06.018URL
[40] Ma L., & Ganea P.A. ( 2010). Dealing with conflicting information: Young children's reliance on what they see versus what they are told. Developmental Science, 13( 1), 151-160.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00878.xURLpmid: 20121871
[41] Ma L., & Woolley J.D. ( 2013). Young children's sensitivity to speaker gender when learning from others. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14( 1), 100-119.
doi: 10.1080/15248372.2011.638687URL
[42] Mascaro O.& Sperber D. ,( 2009). The moral, epistemic, and mindreading components of children’s vigilance towards deception. Cognition, 112( 3), 367-380.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.012URL
[43] Miller C. F., Lurye L. E., Zosuls K. M., & Ruble D. N . ( 2009). Accessibility of gender stereotype domains: Developmental and gender differences in children. Sex Roles, 60( 11-12), 870-881.
doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9584-xURLpmid: 2709873
[44] Nurmsoo E., & Robinson E.J. ( 2009). Identifying unreliable informants: Do children excuse past inaccuracy?. Developmental Science, 12( 1), 41-47.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00750.xURLpmid: 19120411
[45] Oosterhof N.N., & Todorov A. , ( 2009). Shared perceptual basis of emotional expressions and trustworthiness impressions from faces. Emotion, 9( 1), 128-133.
doi: 10.1037/a0014520URLpmid: 19186926
[46] Pham M.T., & Avnet T. , ( 2009). Contingent reliance on the affect heuristic as a function of regulatory focus. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108( 2), 267-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.10.001URL
[47] Rennels J.L.&, Langlois J.H, 2014 a). Children's attractiveness, gender, and race biases: A comparison of their strength and generality. Child Development, 85( 4), 1401-1418.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12226URLpmid: 4107158
[48] Rennels J.L.&, Langlois J.H, 2014 b). Children’s classification and lexicalization of attractiveness, gender, and race: Differential displays of these concepts and relatedness to bias and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126( 6), 1-18.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.02.009URL
[49] Robinson E. J., Butterfill S. A., & Nurmsoo E . ( 2011). Gaining knowledge via other minds: Children's flexible trust in others as sources of information. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29( 4), 961-980.
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02036.xURLpmid: 21995747
[50] Ronfard S., & Lane J.D. ( 2017). Preschoolers continually adjust their epistemic trust based on an informant's ongoing accuracy. Child Development, 89( 2), 414-429.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12720URLpmid: 28105637
[51] Rozin P., & Royzman E.B. ( 2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5( 4), 296-320.
doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2URL
[52] Sabbagh M.A.&, Baldwin D.A, 2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers' theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development, 72( 4), 1054-1070.
doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00334URLpmid: 11480934
[53] Sobel D.M.&, Corriveau K.H, 2010). Children monitor individuals' expertise for word learning. Child Development, 81( 2), 669-679.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01422.xURLpmid: 20438467
[54] Sommer W., Hildebrandt A., Kunina-Habenicht O., Schacht A., & Wilhelm O . ( 2013). Sex differences in face cognition. Acta Psychologica, 142( 1), 62-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.001URLpmid: 23232336
[55] Sperber D., Clément F., Heintz C., Mascaro O., Mercier H., Origgi G., & Wilson D . ( 2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25( 4), 359-393.
[56] TaylorM. M.G . ( 2013). Gender influences on children’s selective trust of adult testimony. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115( 4), 672-690.
doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.04.003URLpmid: 23708732
[57] Todorov A. ( 2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124( 1), 208-224.
doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.012URL
[58] Todorov A., Pakrashi M., & Oosterhof N. N . ( 2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27( 6), 813-833.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813URL
[59] Vanderbilt K. E., Liu D., & Heyman G. D . ( 2011). The development of distrust. Child Development, 82( 5), 1372-1380.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01629.xURL
[60] Wang Y. ( 2012). The developmental mechanism of 3 to 5 years old children’s selective trust ability. ( Unpublished Master degree thesis). Shenyang Normal University.
[ 王颖 . ( 2012). 3-5岁幼儿选择性信任能力的发展机制(硕士论文). 沈阳师范大学.]
[61] Wang Y. Q., Yao P. F., & Zhou G. M . ( 2015). The influence of facial attractiveness and personality labels on men and women’s mate preference. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 1), 108-118.
[ 王雨晴, 姚鹏飞, 周国梅 . ( 2015). 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47( 1), 108-118.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00108URL
[62] Yang L., & Hu Z.Q . ( 2010). Affect Heuristic in Bayesian Reasoning. Psychological Exploration, 30( 3), 18-21.
[ 杨莉, 胡竹菁 . ( 2010). 贝叶斯推理中的情感启发式. 心理学探新, 30( 3), 18-21.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2010.03.005URL
[63] Yuan M., Deng Z., & Ji P . ( 2013). Children’s social epistemology: Children’s selective trust in informants. Advances in Psychological Science, 21( 3), 480-486.
[ 袁鸣, 邓铸, 季培 . ( 2013). 儿童社会认识论: 儿童对信息提供者的选择性信任. 心理科学进展, 21( 3), 480-486.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00480URL
[64] Zhang L.P.& Zhou H. ,( 2011). Children’s selective trust based on judgments of information: Its relationship with prosocial behavior and decision making. Psychological Development and Education, 27( 1), 71-75.
[ 张兰萍, 周晖 . ( 2011). 幼儿基于信息判断的选择性信任——与亲社会行为及决策判断的关系. 心理发展与教育, 27( 1), 71-75.]




[1]田欣然, 侯文霞, 欧玉晓, 易冰, 陈文锋, 尚俊辰. 基于合成平均刺激的平均表征机制——来自平均面孔吸引力的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(7): 714-728.
[2]姚尧, 陈晓湘. 音乐训练对4~5岁幼儿普通话声调范畴感知能力的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(4): 456-468.
[3]贺晓玲, 陈俊. 3~5岁幼儿权力概念多重隐喻的认知发展[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 149-161.
[4]金心怡,周冰欣,孟斐. 3岁幼儿的二级观点采择及合作互动的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(9): 1028-1039.
[5]李泉,宋亚男,廉彬,冯廷勇. 正念训练提升3~4岁幼儿注意力和执行功能[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(3): 324-336.
[6]韩尚锋, 李 玥, 刘燊, 徐强, 谭群, 张林. 美在观察者眼中:陌生面孔吸引力评价中 的晕轮效应与泛化效应[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 363-376.
[7]李婷玉, 刘黎, 李宜霖, 朱莉琪. 冲突情境下幼儿的选择性信任和信念修正[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(12): 1390-1399.
[8]李婷玉;刘黎;朱莉琪. 4~6岁幼儿经济博弈中的信任行为及其影响因素[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(1): 17-27.
[9]胡清芬;卢静. 幼儿在地图任务中对自我位置与自我朝向的结合[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(9): 1143-1150.
[10]邢淑芬;梁熙;岳建宏;王争艳. 祖辈共同养育背景下多重依恋关系及对幼儿社会−情绪性发展的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(5): 518-528.
[11]钱淼;周立霞;鲁甜甜;翁梦星;傅根跃. 幼儿友好型内隐联想测验的建构及有效性[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 903-913.
[12]王福兴;李文静;颜志强;段朝辉;李卉. 幼儿对威胁性刺激蛇的注意觉察:来自眼动证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 774-786.
[13]卢静;胡清芬. 幼儿在地图任务中自我位置与自我朝向表征能力的发展[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(2): 234-242.
[14]王雨晴;姚鹏飞;周国梅. 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(1): 108-118.
[15]贺琼;王争艳;王莉;蒋彩虹;上官芳芳. 新入园幼儿的皮质醇变化与上呼吸道感染的关系:气质的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 516-527.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4361
相关话题/心理 信息 社会 人数 过程