data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1 华南师范大学心理学院
2 教育部人文社科重点研究基地 心理应用研究中心, 广州 510631
3 广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室, 广州 510631
4 保利集团, 广州 510220
5 北京教育学院基础教育人才研究院, 北京 100044
收稿日期:
2018-07-11出版日期:
2019-06-25发布日期:
2019-04-25通讯作者:
何先友E-mail:xianyouhe@163.comThe effects of different power relations on negation bias of negative descriptions
LI Ting1, WEI Xiaoping4, ZHENG Zixin1, YI Xiangjie1, ZHAO Xueru5, HE Xianyou1,2,3(data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddae9/ddae9b72a39e834d171a5da88fb8629100e9262b" alt=""
1 School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
2 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
3 Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
4 Poly Group, Guangzhou 510220, China
5 Research Institute for Basic Education Professionals, Beijing Institute of Education, Beijing 100044, China
Received:
2018-07-11Online:
2019-06-25Published:
2019-04-25Contact:
HE Xianyou E-mail:xianyouhe@163.com摘要/Abstract
摘要: 采用固定反应范式和自由反应范式, 通过创设语用情景, 考察不同权力关系对消极特质否定句使用偏向的影响。结果表明:(1)低权力者评价高权力者时, 被试倾向于使用否定方式(如“不聪明的”), 并认为否定的表述方式合适性较高, 出现否定偏向; 而高权力者评价低权力者, 或者权力平级时则没有否定偏向的出现, 肯定表述(如“愚蠢的”)被更多使用; (2)权力平级时, 社会距离会影响消极特质否定句的使用, 社会距离越远, 消极特质否定句的使用越少; 社会距离越近, 消极特质否定句的使用越多。结果表明, 权力关系与社会距离是影响消极特质否定句使用偏向的重要因素。
图/表 4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28108/28108c86059a4399f3cf3cf6016083ff29bc770b" alt=""
图1实验1流程图
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28108/28108c86059a4399f3cf3cf6016083ff29bc770b" alt=""
表1不同权力条件下的词语选择的平均数与标准差(M ± SD)
反应 | 条件类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
权力高对低 | 权力低对高 | 权力平级 | |
肯定 | 20.62 ± 3.19 | 11.79 ± 2.76 | 15.91 ± 2.31 |
否定 | 6.37 ± 3.19 | 15.21 ± 2.76 | 11.09 ± 2.31 |
表1不同权力条件下的词语选择的平均数与标准差(M ± SD)
反应 | 条件类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
权力高对低 | 权力低对高 | 权力平级 | |
肯定 | 20.62 ± 3.19 | 11.79 ± 2.76 | 15.91 ± 2.31 |
否定 | 6.37 ± 3.19 | 15.21 ± 2.76 | 11.09 ± 2.31 |
表2不同权力条件下的反应时(ms)的平均数与标准差(M ± SD)
反应 | 条件类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
权力高对低 | 权力低对高 | 权力平级 | |
肯定 | 1333 ± 298 | 1428 ± 290 | 1428 ± 298 |
否定 | 1408 ± 350 | 1410 ± 314 | 1454 ± 322 |
表2不同权力条件下的反应时(ms)的平均数与标准差(M ± SD)
反应 | 条件类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
权力高对低 | 权力低对高 | 权力平级 | |
肯定 | 1333 ± 298 | 1428 ± 290 | 1428 ± 298 |
否定 | 1408 ± 350 | 1410 ± 314 | 1454 ± 322 |
表3不同权力条件下肯定表述与否定表述的合适性评价的平均数与标准差(M ± SD)
反应 | 条件类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
权力高对低 | 权力低对高 | 权力平级 | |
肯定 | 5.25 ± 0.88 | 3.98 ± 1.04 | 4.23 ± 0.76 |
否定 | 3.97 ± 1.22 | 4.85 ± 1.27 | 4.35 ± 1.08 |
表3不同权力条件下肯定表述与否定表述的合适性评价的平均数与标准差(M ± SD)
反应 | 条件类型 | ||
---|---|---|---|
权力高对低 | 权力低对高 | 权力平级 | |
肯定 | 5.25 ± 0.88 | 3.98 ± 1.04 | 4.23 ± 0.76 |
否定 | 3.97 ± 1.22 | 4.85 ± 1.27 | 4.35 ± 1.08 |
参考文献 38
[1] | Beukeboom C. J. ( 2014).Mechanisms of linguistic bias: How words reflect and maintain stereotypic expectancies. In J. Laszlo, J. Forgas, & O. Vincze (Eds.), Social Cognition and Communication (pp. 313-330). New York, NY: Psychology Press. |
[2] | Beukeboom C. J., Finkenauer C., & Wigboldus D. J . ( 2010). The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99( 6), 978-992. doi: 10.1037/a0020861URL |
[3] | Brown P. & Levinson, S. P. ,( 1978) . Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: University Press. |
[4] | Chang J. Y . ( 2000). Pragmatic functions of euphemism expression and teaching Chinese as a foreign language. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies,( 3), 32-36. |
[ 常敬宇 . ( 2000). 委婉表达法的语用功能与对外汉语教学. 语言教学与研究, ( 3), 32-36.] | |
[5] | Deutsch R., Gawronski B., & Strack F . ( 2006). At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91( 3), 385-405. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.385URL |
[6] | Douglas K. M., & Sutton R. M . ( 2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84( 4), 682-696. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.682URL |
[7] | Dubois D., Rucker D. D., & Galinsky A. D . ( 2010). The accentuation bias: Money literally looms larger (and sometimes smaller) to the powerless. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1( 3), 199-205. doi: 10.1177/1948550610365170URL |
[8] | Du W., Yan C. P., Sun X. M., & Zhang H. C . ( 2009). An experimental research on linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Psychological Science, 32( 1), 106-109. |
[ 杜卫, 闫春平, 孙晓敏, 张厚粲 . ( 2009). 语言的群体间偏差研究. 心理科学, 32( 1), 106-109.] | |
[9] | Fast N. J., Sivanathan N., Mayer N. D., & Galinsky A. D . ( 2012). Power and overconfident decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117( 2), 249-260. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.009URL |
[10] | Fiske S. T . ( 1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48( 6), 621-628. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621URL |
[11] | Fu C. Y . ( 2006). Influence of gender role and social power on criticism speech act (Unpublished master’s thesis). Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan. |
[ 付春媛 . ( 2006). 论性别角色与权势因素对批评言语行为的影响 (硕士学位论文). 华中科技大学, 武汉.] | |
[12] | Geschke D., Sassenberg K Ruhrmann, G, & Sommer, D. , ( 2010). Effects of linguistic abstractness in the mass media: How newspaper articles shape reader’s attitudes toward migrants. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories Methods and Applications, 22( 3), 99-104. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000014URL |
[13] | Giessner S. R., & Schubert T. W . ( 2007). High in the hierarchy: How vertical location and judgments of leader’s power are interrelated. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 104( 1), 30-44. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.10.001URL |
[14] | Giora R .( 2006). Anything negatives can do affirmatives can do just as well, except for some metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 38( 7), 981-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.12.006URL |
[15] | Glenberg A. M., Robertson D. A., Jansen J. L & Johnson- Glenberg, M. C. , ( 1999). Not propositions. Cognitive Systems Research, 1( 1), 19-33. doi: 10.1016/S1389-0417(99)00004-2URL |
[16] | Gough P. B . ( 1965). Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4( 2), 107-111. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80093-7URL |
[17] | Hofstede G . ( 1980). Motivation, leadership and organization: Do American theories apply abroad. Organization Dynamics, 9( 1), 42-63. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(80)90013-3URL |
[18] | Hui X. M . ( 2010). Subjective meanings of negation. Foreing Language Research,( 6), 6-8. |
[ 惠秀梅 . ( 2010). 否定意义的主观性. 外语学刊, ( 6), 6-8.] | |
[19] | Jia Y. X. ( 1997). Intercultural communication. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press. |
[ 贾玉新 . ( 1997). 跨文化交际学. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.] | |
[20] | Jordan M. P . ( 1998). The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 29( 6), 705-752. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00086-6URL |
[21] | Keltner D., Gruenfeld D. H., & Anderson C . ( 2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110( 2), 265-284. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265URL |
[22] | Lei C . ( 2010). Effects of power distance on pragmatic errors in intercultural communication. Journal of Suzhou University, 25( 7), 70-73. |
[ 雷聪 . ( 2010). 跨文化交际中权力距离对语用失误的影响. 宿州学院学报, 25( 7), 70-73.] | |
[23] | Liu. J. F . ( 2008). Discussing on the new definition of face. Science of Social Psychology, 23( 5), 30-35. |
[24] | [ 刘继富 . ( 2008). “面子”定义探新. 社会心理科学, 23( 5), 30-35.] |
[25] | Maner J. K., Gailliot M. T., Menzel A. J., & Kunstman J. W . ( 2012). Dispositional anxiety blocks the psychological effects of power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38( 11), 1383-1395. doi: 10.1177/0146167212453341URL |
[26] | Menegatti M., & Rubini M. , ( 2013). Convincing similar and dissimilar others: The power of language abstraction in political communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39( 5), 596-607. doi: 10.1177/0146167213479404URL |
[27] | Sherman J. W., Lee A. Y., Bessenoff G. R., & Leigh A . ( 1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75( 3), 589-606. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.589URL |
[28] | Srull T. K., Lichtenstein M., & Rothbart M . ( 1985). Associative storage and retrieval processes in person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11( 2), 316-345. |
[29] | Tiedens L. Z., Unzueta M. M., & Young M. J . ( 2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93( 3), 402-414. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.402URL |
[30] | Trope Y., & Liberman N. , ( 2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychology Review, 117( 2), 440-463. doi: 10.1037/a0018963URL |
[31] | Van Kleef G. A., Oveis C., Van der Löwe I., LuoKogan A., Goetz J., & Keltner D . ( 2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19( 12), 1315-1322. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02241.xURL |
[32] | Von Hippel W., Sekaquaptewa D., & Vargas P . ( 1997). The linguistic intergroup bias as an implicit indicator of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33( 5), 490-509. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1332URL |
[33] | Wason P. C . ( 1965). The contexts of plausible denial. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4( 1), 7-11. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(65)80060-3URL |
[34] | Xu T. J . ( 2015). Negation bias of linguistic and its effect on the impression valuation. ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan. |
[35] | [ 徐同洁 . ( 2015). 否定偏向及其对印象评价的影响 (硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.] |
[36] | Xu T. J., Wen F. F., Fu D. Q., Zuo B., & Xiao R. F . ( 2014). Linguistic bias and its influencing factors in interpersonal communication. Advances in Psychological Science, 22( 7), 1188-1197. |
[ 徐同洁, 温芳芳, 浮东琴, 佐斌, 肖任飞 . ( 2014). 人际沟通中的语言偏向及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 22( 7), 1188-1197.] doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01188URL | |
[37] | Zhang S. M., Zhong Y. P., & Luo F. S . ( 2015). A study of implicit stereotype of power: Base on IAT and GNAT measure. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23( 1), 56-59. |
[ 张珊明, 钟毅平, 罗伏生 . ( 2015). 内隐权力刻板印象:基于IAT和GNAT的测量. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23( 1), 56-59.] | |
[38] | Zhong Y. P., & Chen H. H . ( 2013). The effects of psychological distance on judging moral behavior. Psychological Exploration, 33( 1), 43-46. |
[ 钟毅平, 陈海洪 . ( 2013). 心理距离对道德行为判断的影响. 心理学探新, 33( 1), 43-46.] |
相关文章 15
[1] | 熊承清, 许佳颖, 马丹阳, 刘永芳. 囚徒困境博弈中对手面部表情对合作行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 919-932. |
[2] | 张环, 王欣, 刘一贝, 曹贤才, 吴捷. 成员关系对协作提取成绩的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 481-493. |
[3] | 佐斌, 刘晨, 温芳芳, 谭潇, 谢志杰. 性别化名字对个体印象评价及人际交往的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(4): 387-399. |
[4] | 崔芳, 杨佳苗, 古若雷, 刘洁. 右侧颞顶联合区及道德加工脑网络的功能连接预测社会性框架效应:来自静息态功能磁共振的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 55-66. |
[5] | 吴奇, 钟春艳, 谢锦源. 拿破仑情结的进化:相对身高劣势和求偶动机对男性冒险行为的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 95-110. |
[6] | 陈思静, 徐烨超. “仁者”还是“智者”:第三方惩罚对惩罚者声誉的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(12): 1436-1451. |
[7] | 罗一君, 牛更枫, 陈红. 生命早期环境不可预测性对过度进食的影响:基于生命史理论[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(10): 1224-1236. |
[8] | 耿晓伟, 刘丹, 牛燕华. 分析思维降低情感预测影响偏差[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(10): 1168-1177. |
[9] | 温芳芳, 马书瀚, 叶含雪, 齐玥, 佐斌. “涟漪效应”与“心理台风眼效应”:不同程度COVID-19疫情地区民众风险认知与焦虑的双视角检验[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1087-1104. |
[10] | 郭人豪, 王婷, 张积家. 多元语言文化对个体情境下与社会情境下认知转换功能的差异性影响——来自锡伯族的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1071-1086. |
[11] | 宋仕婕, 佐斌, 温芳芳, 谭潇. 群体认同对群际敏感效应及其行为表现的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 993-1003. |
[12] | 曹贤才, 王大华, 王岩. 情节模拟对预期伴侣反应性及依恋安全感的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 982-992. |
[13] | 王琳, 陈增祥, 何云. 传承动机对金融冒险行为的影响:未来自我连续性的中介[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(8): 1004-1016. |
[14] | 赵玉杰, 高扬, 周欣悦. 天气和空气污染对诚信行为的影响:一项校园丢钱包的现场实验[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(7): 909-920. |
[15] | 张环, 侯双, 王海曼, 廉宇煊, 杨海波. 他人在场条件下的社会分享型提取诱发遗忘[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 716-729. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4458