删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

父亲参照效应的语言与文化差异:来自提取诱发遗忘的证据

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

杨群, 冯意然, 张积家()
中国人民大学心理学系、国家民委民族语言文化心理重点研究基地、教育部民族教育发展中心民族心理与教育重点研究基地, 北京 100872
收稿日期:2018-07-17出版日期:2019-03-25发布日期:2019-01-22
通讯作者:张积家E-mail:Zhangjj1955@163.com

基金资助:* 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助)项目“语言影响人格:来自双语者与双言者的行为与生理证据”阶段性成果(17XNL002)

The language and cultural differences of father-reference processing: Based on the retrieval-induced forgetting

YANG Qun, FENG Yiran, ZHANG Jijia()
Key Research Center for National Psychology and Education, the National Education Development Center of the Ministry of Education, Beijing 100872, China
Received:2018-07-17Online:2019-03-25Published:2019-01-22
Contact:ZHANG Jijia E-mail:Zhangjj1955@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 采用提取诱发遗忘范式考察维吾尔族人和汉族人在自我参照、父亲参照和他人参照下的记忆特点, 发现维吾尔族被试在自我参照下和父亲参照下均未出现提取诱发遗忘, 在一般他人参照下出现提取诱发遗忘, 说明在维吾尔人中父亲参照加工与自我参照加工相较于一般他人参照加工存在优势; 汉族被试仅在自我参照下未出现提取诱发遗忘, 在父亲参照下和他人参照下均出现了提取诱发遗忘, 说明在汉族被试中仅有自我参照加工相较于一般他人参照加工具有优势, 父亲参照加工并未表现出同样的优势。这表明, 不同的语言和文化影响个体的自我建构, 父亲仅出现在维吾尔族人的自我建构中, 在姓名结构中父名与本名共现与否是影响两个民族自我建构差异的重要因素。


表1被试在不同加工条件下的平均回忆率
任务 民族 N 总回忆率 Rp+ Rp- Nrp (Rp+)- Nrp (Rp-) -Nrp
自我 维吾尔族 30 0.29 (0.09) 0.66 (0.25) 0.17 (0.19) 0.15 (0.12) 0.51 (0.30)*** 0.02 (0.21)
汉族 30 0.36 (0.09) 0.78 (0.14) 0.20 (0.16) 0.24 (0.12) 0.54 (0.16)*** -0.05 (0.19)
父亲 维吾尔族 30 0.30 (0.12) 0.73 (0.23) 0.17 (0.17) 0.15 (0.12) 0.58 (0.24)*** 0.02 (0.15)
汉族 30 0.38 (0.11) 0.78 (0.16) 0.18 (0.14) 0.28 (0.117) 0.50 (0.23)*** -0.10 (0.18)*
他人 维吾尔族 30 0.33 (0.11) 0.75 (0.19) 0.15 (0.18) 0.21 (0.15) 0.54 (0.27)*** -0.06 (0.15)*
汉族 30 0.36 (0.09) 0.69 (0.22) 0.05 (0.04) 0.27 (0.10) 0.42 (0.26)*** -0.22 (0.09)*

表1被试在不同加工条件下的平均回忆率
任务 民族 N 总回忆率 Rp+ Rp- Nrp (Rp+)- Nrp (Rp-) -Nrp
自我 维吾尔族 30 0.29 (0.09) 0.66 (0.25) 0.17 (0.19) 0.15 (0.12) 0.51 (0.30)*** 0.02 (0.21)
汉族 30 0.36 (0.09) 0.78 (0.14) 0.20 (0.16) 0.24 (0.12) 0.54 (0.16)*** -0.05 (0.19)
父亲 维吾尔族 30 0.30 (0.12) 0.73 (0.23) 0.17 (0.17) 0.15 (0.12) 0.58 (0.24)*** 0.02 (0.15)
汉族 30 0.38 (0.11) 0.78 (0.16) 0.18 (0.14) 0.28 (0.117) 0.50 (0.23)*** -0.10 (0.18)*
他人 维吾尔族 30 0.33 (0.11) 0.75 (0.19) 0.15 (0.18) 0.21 (0.15) 0.54 (0.27)*** -0.06 (0.15)*
汉族 30 0.36 (0.09) 0.69 (0.22) 0.05 (0.04) 0.27 (0.10) 0.42 (0.26)*** -0.22 (0.09)*



图1被试在不同条件下对Rp+材料、Rp-材料与Nrp材料的回忆率 注:* p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001
图1被试在不同条件下对Rp+材料、Rp-材料与Nrp材料的回忆率 注:* p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001



图2维吾尔族被试在三种加工条件下的提取诱发遗忘
图2维吾尔族被试在三种加工条件下的提取诱发遗忘



图3汉族被试在三种加工条件下的提取诱发遗忘
图3汉族被试在三种加工条件下的提取诱发遗忘







[1] Alexopoulos T., Muller D., Ric F., &Marendaz C . ( 2012). I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42( 6), 770-779.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1882URL
[2] Anderson M. C., Bjork R. A., &Bjork E. L . ( 1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20( 5), 1063-1087.
doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.5.1063URLpmid: 7931095
[3] Anderson M. C., Bjork E. L., &Bjork R. A . ( 2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7( 3), 522-530.
doi: 10.3758/BF03214366URLpmid: 11082860
[4] Arnell K. M., Shapiro K. L., &Sorensen R. E . ( 1999). Reduced repetition blindness for one's own name. Visual Cognition, 6( 6), 609-635.
doi: 10.1080/135062899394876URL
[5] Berlad I., &Pratt H. ( 1995). P300 in response to the subject's own name. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 96( 5), 472-474.
doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(95)00116-AURLpmid: 7555920
[6] Bruning J.L . ( 1972). The effects of connotative meaning on the learning of names. The Journal of Social Psychology, 86( 1), 105-110.
doi: 10.1080/00224545.1972.9918600URL
[7] Cai Q., &Brysbaert M. ( 2010). Subtlex-ch: Chinese word and character frequency based on film subtiles. Plos One, 5( 6), e10729.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010729URLpmid: 2880003
[8] Carlin F. ( 2004). Hello my name is unique. Psychology Today, 37( 2), 44-46.
[9] Carmody D.P., &Lewis M. ( 2006). Brain activation when hearing one's own and others' names. Brain Research, 1116( 1), 153-158.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.121URLpmid: 16959226
[10] Chen S.X., Benet-Martínez V., &Ng J. C . ( 2013). Does language affect personality perception? A functional approach to testing the Whorfian hypothesis. Journal of Personality, 82( 2), 130-143.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.12040URLpmid: 23607801
[11] Criss A. H., Malmberg K. J., &Shiffrin R. M . ( 2011). Output interference in recognition memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 64( 4), 316-326.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.003URL
[12] Emma O . ( 1997). Assigning a name to a child: Gender differences in two overlapping generations. The Journal of Psychology, 131( 2), 133-140.
doi: 10.1080/00223989709601958URL
[13] Erwin P.G . ( 1993). First names and perceptions of physical attractiveness. The Journal of Psychology, 127( 6), 625-632.
doi: 10.1080/00223980.1993.9914901URLpmid: 8301616
[14] Fischer C., Dailler F., &Morlet D . ( 2008). Novelty p3 elicited by the subject's own name in comatose patients. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119( 10), 2224-2230.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.035URLpmid: 18760663
[15] Folmer R.L., &Yingling C.D . ( 1997). Auditory p3 responses to name stimuli. Brain & Language, 56( 2), 306-311.
doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1828URLpmid: 9027376
[16] Freedman D.J., &Assad J.A . ( 2011). A proposed common neural mechanism for categorization and perceptual decisions. Nature Neuroscience, 14( 2), 143-146.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2740URLpmid: 21270782
[17] Gao M. K., &Shi, A. S .( 1963). Introduction to Linguistics. Beijing: The Chinese Publishing House.
[ 高名凯, 石安石 . ( 1963). 语言学概论. 北京: 中华书局.]
[18] Garwood S. G., Cox L., Kaplan V., Wasserman N., &Sulzer J. L . ( 1980). Beauty is only “name” deep: The effect of first-name on ratings of physical attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10( 5), 431-435.
doi: 10.1111/jasp.1980.10.issue-5URL
[19] Han H.W . ( 2016). The paradox of patriarchal belief -- Criticism and reflection on the marriage customs of the uyghur "tarak" . Journal of Yili Normal University (Social Science Edition),( 1), 131-135.
[ 韩宏伟 . ( 2016). 父权主义信仰的悖论——对维吾尔族“塔拉克”婚俗的批判与反思. 伊犁师范学院学报(社会科学版), ( 1), 131-135. ]
[20] Han S. H., Ma Y. N., &Wang G . ( 2016). Shared neural representations of self and conjugal family members in Chinese brain. Culture and Brain, 4( 1), 72-86.
doi: 10.1007/s40167-016-0036-5URL
[21] Harris C. R., Pashler H. E., &Coburn P . ( 2004). Moray revisited: High-priority affective stimuli and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57( 1), 1-31.
doi: 10.1080/02724980343000107URLpmid: 14681002
[22] He X., &Zhu Y. ( 2010). Social cognitive neuroscience studies on the self. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 46( 6), 1021-1024.
[ 贺熙, 朱滢 . ( 2010). 社会认知神经科学关于自我的研究. 北京大学学报, 46( 6), 1021-1024. ]
[23] Hensley W. E., &Spencer B.A . ( 1985). The effects of first names on the perceptions of female attractiveness. Sex Roles, 12( 7-8), 723-729.
doi: 10.1007/BF00287866URL
[24] Holeckova I., Fischer C., Giard M-H., Delpuech C., &Morlet D . ( 2006). Brain responses to a subject's own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Research, 1082( 1), 142-152.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.089URLpmid: 16703673
[25] Huang L.L . ( 2017). On the relationship between language and culture. Ability,( 17), 222.
[ 黄理漓 . ( 2017). 浅谈语言与文化的关系. 才智, ( 17), 222.]
[26] Hu C., Liu Z.Y., Chen L., &Mo L . ( 2010). The role of labels in children's inductive reasoning. Advances In Psychological Science, 18( 2), 224-242.
[ 胡诚, 刘志雅, 陈琳, 莫雷 . ( 2010). 儿童归纳推理中的标签作用. 心理科学进展, 18( 2), 224-242.]
[27] Huddleston E., &Anderson M.C . ( 2012). Reassessing critiques of the independent probe method for studying inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38( 5), 1408-1418.
doi: 10.1037/a0027092URLpmid: 22329790
[28] Huff S., Yoon C., Lee F., Mandadi A., &Gutchess A. H . ( 2013). Self-referential processing and encoding in bicultural individuals. Culture and Brain, 1( 1), 16-33.
doi: 10.1007/s40167-013-0005-1URL
[29] Hulbert J. C., Shivde G., &Anderson M. C . ( 2012). Evidence against associative blocking as a cause of cue-independent retrieval-induced forgetting. Experimental Psychology, 59( 1), 11-21.
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000120URLpmid: 21768070
[30] Koole S.L., &Pelham B.W . ( 2003). On the nature of implicit self-esteem: The case of the name letter effect. In S. J. Spencer, S. Fein, M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario Symposium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[31] Lévi-Strauss C .( 1995). Structural anthropology. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House.
[ 克洛德·列维斯特劳斯 .( 1995). 结构人类学. 上海: 上海译文出版社. ]
[32] Li Q.C . ( 2017). The influence of Names perception, pronunciation and referencing subject on interpersonal initial trust level (Unpublished master dissertation). Hunan Normal University, Changsha.
[ 李前程 . ( 2017). 名字的字义和字音以及参照主体对人际初始信任水平的影响(硕士学位论文). 湖南师范大学, 重庆. ]
[33] Liu S.Y., &Meng J.X . ( 2015). The influence of language labels and self-reference on new object categorical perception. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 3), 285-299.
[ 刘思耘, 孟健欣 . ( 2015). 语言标签和自我关联对新颖客体类别知觉的影响. 心理学报, 47( 3), 285-299.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00285URL
[34] Long C. Q., Li H., Deng X. F., Yuan Y., Li J., &Lei Y . ( 2012). What’s in a name? Similar and indentical labels in Chinese children’s induction. Psychological Development and Education, 28( 3), 239-247.
[ 龙长权, 李红, 邓小凤, 袁颖, 李军, 雷怡 . ( 2012). 相似和相同语言标签对幼儿归纳推理的影响. 心理发展与教育, 28( 3), 239-247.]
[35] Luna D., Ringberg T., &Peracchio L. A . ( 2008). One individual, two identities: Frame switching among biculturals. Journal of Consumer Research, 35( 2), 279-293.
doi: 10.1086/586914URL
[36] Macrae C.N., &Roseveare T.A . ( 2002). I was always on my mind: The self and temporary forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9( 3), 611-614.
doi: 10.3758/BF03196320URLpmid: 12412904
[37] Marhaba M., &Wu Y ., 2017). The dynamic characteristic of self-construal: A polycultural perspective. Advances of Psychological Science, 25( 7), 1229-1239.
[ 买热巴·买买提, 吴艳红 . ( 2017). 聚合文化视角下自我构念的动态性特征. 心理科学进展, 25( 7), 1229-1239.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.01229URL
[38] Marian V., &Kaushanskaya M. ( 2004). Self-construal and emotion in bicultural bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 51( 2), 190-201.
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.003URL
[39] Markus H.R., &Kitayama S. ( 1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98( 2), 224-253.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224URL
[40] Mehrabian A., &Piercy M. ( 1993). Affective and personality characteristics inferred from length of first names. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19( 6), 755-758.
doi: 10.1177/0146167293196011URL
[41] Moray N. ( 1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11( 1), 56-60.
doi: 10.1080/17470215908416289URL
[42] Mu Y., &Han S. ( 2010). Neural oscillations involved in self-referential processing. Neuroimage, 55( 2), 757-768.
[43] Ng S. H., Han S., Mao L., &Lai J. C . ( 2010). Dynamic bicultural brains: fMRI study of their flexible neural representation of self and significant others in response to culture primes. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13( 2), 83-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2010.01303.xURL
[44] Northoff G., Heinzel A., de Greck M., Bermpohl F., Dobrowolny H., &Panksepp J . ( 2006). Self-referential processing in our brain--A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. Neuroimage, 31( 1), 440-457.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002URLpmid: 16466680
[45] Pfister R., Pohl C., Kiesel A., &Kunde W . ( 2012). Your unconscious knows your name. PLoS ONE, 7( 3), e32402.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032402URLpmid: 3293799
[46] Plaut V. C., Markus H. R., Treadway J. R., &Fu A. S . ( 2012). The cultural construction of self and well-being: A tale of two cities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38( 12), 1644-1658.
doi: 10.1177/0146167212458125URL
[47] Pratt H., Berlad I., &Lavie P . ( 1999). 'Oddball' event- related potentials and information processing during REM and non-REM sleep. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110( 1), 53-61.
doi: 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00044-6URLpmid: 10348321
[48] Qi J.L., &Zhu Y. ( 2002). The self-reference effect of Chinese college students. Journal of Psychological Science, 25( 3), 275-278.
[ 戚健俐, 朱滢 . ( 2002). 中国大学生的记忆的自我参照效应. 心理科学, 25( 3), 275-278.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6981.2002.03.005URL
[49] Sun X., Li X., Jia L., Zhang Q. L . ( 2013). The relative uniqueness of personal names: Evidences from the RSVP. Journal of Psychological Science, 36( 1), 72-77.
[ 孙晓, 李肖, 贾磊, 张庆林 . ( 2013). 自我姓名加工的相对独特性: 来自RSVP的证据. 心理科学, 36( 1), 72-77.]
[50] Tacikowski P., &Nowicka A. ( 2010). Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 84( 2), 318-324.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.009URLpmid: 20298741
[51] Tacikowski P., Brechmann A., Marchewka A., Jednoróg K., Dobrowolny M., &Nowicka A . ( 2011). Is it about the self or the significance? An fMRI study of self-name recognition. Social Neuroscience, 6( 1), 98-107.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2010.490665URLpmid: 20602286
[52] Tacikowski P., Brechmann A., &Nowicka A . ( 2013). Cross-modal pattern of brain activations associated with the processing of self and significant other's name. Human Brain Mapping, 34( 9), 2069-2077.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.22048URLpmid: 22431327
[53] Tulving E., &Arbuckle T.Y . ( 1966). Input and output interference in short-term associative memory. Journey of Experiment Psycholoy, 72( 1), 145-150.
doi: 10.1037/h0023344URLpmid: 5967720
[54] Uchida Y., Ueno T., &Miyamoto Y . ( 2014). You were always on my mind: The importance of “significant others” in the attenuation of retrieval-induced forgetting in Japan. Japanese Psychological Research, 56( 3), 263-274.
doi: 10.1111/jpr.12051URL
[55] Wang F .( 2014). Processing priority for one’s own name (Unpublished master dissertation). Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
[ 王芳 . ( 2014). 自我名字的加工优势研究(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.]
[56] Wang H.D . ( 2016). The study of names from the perspective of social constructivism-based on the investigation and analysis of the names on genealogie (Unpublished master dissertation). Shanghai:East China Normal University.
[ 王慧冬 . ( 2016). 社会建构视角下的姓名研究——基于族谱录姓名的调查分析(硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.]
[57] Wang M.G., &Wang X.F . ( 2017). The study on pedigree of Yi people’s patronymic linkage naming system. Journal of Sichuan Minzu College, 26( 2), 21-24.
[ 王明贵, 王小丰 . ( 2017). 彝族父子连名制谱系研究. 四川民族学院学报, 26( 2), 21-24.]
[58] Wang W.B . ( 2008). A cognitive investigation of "one classifier for multiple objects" in both Chinese and English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 40( 4), 257-261.
[ 王文斌 . ( 2008). 汉英“一量多物”现象的认知分析. 外语教学与研究, 40( 4), 257-261.]
[59] Watson R.S . ( 1986). The named and the nameless: Gender and person in Chinese society. American Ethnologist, 13( 4), 619-631.
doi: 10.1525/ae.1986.13.4.02a00020URL
[60] Wittgenstein L . ( 2013). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Beijing: Commercial Press.
[ 路德维希·维特根斯坦 . ( 2013). 逻辑哲学论(贺绍甲译). 北京: 商务印书馆.]
[61] Wolford G., &Morrison F. ( 1980). Processing of unattended visual information. Memory & Cognition, 8( 6), 521-527.
doi: 10.3758/BF03213771URLpmid: 7219172
[62] Wood N. &Cowan N. ( 1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one's name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21( 1), 255-260.
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.255URLpmid: 7876773
[63] Xia R. X., Niu B. L., Kou M. J., &Jin R. J . ( 2016). The self study and prospective from cultural perspective. Psychological Research, 9( 5), 3-8.
[ 夏瑞雪, 牛百灵, 寇明娇, 金瑞秸 . ( 2016). 文化视角下的自我研究及展望. 心理研究, 9( 5), 3-8.].
[64] Xu D.H . ( 2008). The cultural contrast of Han and Uygur Nationalities. Journal of Hetian Normal College, 28( 5), 121-122.
[ 许多会 . ( 2008). 汉维起名文化对比. 和田师范专科学校学报, 28( 5), 121-122.]
[65] Yang F. Y . ( 2006). Theoretical and experimental study on implicit self-esteem (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). East China Normal University, Shanghai.
[ 杨福义 . ( 2006). 内隐自尊的理论与实验研究(博士毕业论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.]
[66] Yang H-S . ( 2013). The role of familiarity in cognitive advantage for self-related information. Journal of Psychological Science, 36( 5), 1058-1065.
[ 杨红升 . ( 2013). 自我信息加工优势中的熟悉性问题. 心理科学, 36( 5), 1058-1065.]
[67] Yang H.S., &Huang X.T . ( 2007). On the uniqueness of self-information processing: Evidence from researches on name recognition. Journal of Psychological Science, 30( 5), 1127-1129.
[ 杨红升, 黄希庭 . ( 2007). 论自我信息处理的唯一性——来自姓名识别研究的证据. 心理科学, 30( 5), 1127-1129.]
[68] Yang H.S., &Zhu Y. ( 2004). The self and retrieval-induced forgetting. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36( 2), 154-159.
[ 杨红升, 朱滢 . ( 2004). 自我与提取诱发遗忘现象. 心理学报, 36( 2), 154-159.]
[69] Yang X.M. ( 1956). The personal naming system of the people of Taiwan. Journal of the Central Research Institute, 3, 311-340.
[ 杨希枚 . ( 1956). 台湾赛夏人的个人命名制. 中央研究院院刊, 3, 311-340.]
[70] Zhang J.J . ( 2015). Language relevance theory: Language influences cognition. Chinese Social Science Today, 2015-11-3.
[ 张积家 . ( 2015). 语言关联性理论: 语言影响认知. 中国社会科学报, 2015-11-3.]
[71] Zhang J. J., Liu H.Y., &Ye Q.Y . ( 2006). The impact of names on perceptions of physical attractiveness. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 12( 2), 127-134.
[ 张积家, 刘红艳, 叶倩仪 . ( 2006). 名字对个体吸引力的影响. 应用心理学, 12( 2), 127-134. ]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6020.2006.02.005URL
[72] Zhang J. J., Liu L. H., &Tan L. H . ( 2005). The hypothesis of linguistic reality: New evidence and view. Linguistic Science, 4( 3), 42-56.
[ 张积家, 刘丽虹, 谭力海 . ( 2005). 语言关联性假设的研究进展——新的证据与看法. 语言科学, 4( 3), 42-56.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9484.2005.03.004URL
[73] Zhang K .( 2014). Chinese translation project report of the chapter in “Name tracing: The influence of a name” (Unpublished master dissertation). Guangxi University, Nanning.
[ 张凯 . ( 2014). 《姓名追溯: 名字的影响力》章节汉译项目报告(硕士学位论文). 广西大学, 南宁.]
[74] Zhao Y. F. ( 2001). Introduction to cognitive linguistics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
[ 赵艳芳 . ( 2001). 认知语言学概论. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.]
[75] Zheng W. ( 2014). The effect of self-related information on conflict task processing (Unpublished master dissertation). Southwest University, Chongqing.
[ 郑伟 . ( 2014). 自我相关信息对冲突任务加工的影响(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.]
[76] Zhou A. B., Zhang F., Ma X. F., &Xia R. X . ( 2015). The cultural differences of Imam-reference processing: Based on the retrieval-induce forgetting paradigm discussed. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 6), 757-764.
[ 周爱保, 张奋, 马小凤, 李建升, 夏瑞雪 . ( 2015). 阿訇参照效应的文化差异: 基于提取诱发遗忘范式的探讨. 心理学报, 47( 6), 757-764.]
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00757URL
[77] Zhu Y., Zhang L .( 2001). Research on self-reference effect. Science China, 31( 6), 537-543.
[ 朱滢, 张力 . ( 2001). 自我记忆效应的实验研究. 中国科学, 31( 6), 537-543.]
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9259.2001.06.008URL
[78] Zhu Y., &Zhang L . ( 2002). An experimental study on the self-reference effect. Science in China Series C: Life Sciences, 45( 2), 120-128.
doi: 10.1360/02yc9014URLpmid: 18763071
[79] Zhu Y., Zhang L., Fan J., &Han S . ( 2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. Neuroimage, 34( 3), 1310-1316.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.047URLpmid: 17134915




[1]张环, 侯双, 王海曼, 廉宇煊, 杨海波. 他人在场条件下的社会分享型提取诱发遗忘[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(6): 716-729.
[2]章鹏程,李杨卓,周淑金,高湘萍,潘鑫. 自我参照加工的近空间距离增强效应:来自行为与ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(8): 879-889.
[3]王斌, 付雅, 张积家. 语言和文化对自我参照条件下提取诱发遗忘的影响——来自汉族人和摩梭人的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(4): 450-461.
[4]范伟;钟毅平;杨子鹿;李琎;欧阳益; 蔡荣华; 李慧云 ;傅小兰 . 外倾个体的自我参照加工程度效应[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(8): 1002-1012.
[5]毛伟宾;赵浩远;东利云;白鹭. 提取诱发遗忘中的情绪记忆权衡效应[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(10): 1219-1228.
[6]周爱保;张奋;马小凤;李建升;夏瑞雪. 阿訇参照效应的文化差异:基于提取诱发遗忘范式的探讨[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(6): 757-764.
[7]钟毅平;范伟;蔡荣华;谭千保;肖丽辉;占友龙;罗西;秦敏辉. 正性情绪诱导下的自我参照加工:来自ERPs的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(3): 341-352 .
[8]慕德芳,宋耀武,陈英. 定向遗忘中提取抑制的机制:成功提取引起抑制[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(01): 26-34.
[9]杨红升,朱滢. 自我与提取诱发遗忘现象[J]. 心理学报, 2004, 36(02): 154-159.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4403
相关话题/心理 语言 科学 材料 文化