删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

亲社会支出对主观幸福感的影响及其作用机制

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

崔馨月1, 李斌1,2(), 贺汝婉1, 张淑颖1, 雷励1
1 暨南大学管理学院
2 暨南大学企业发展研究所, 广州 510632
收稿日期:2020-08-11出版日期:2021-07-15发布日期:2021-05-24
通讯作者:李斌E-mail:bingoli@jnu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学(71601084);广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研究基地暨南大学企业发展研究所粤港澳大湾区企业转型发展研究重点项目(2019GBAZD01);创新培育项目(2020CP04);广州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划2019年度课题(2019GZGJ29);暨南大学管理学院重点学科建设育题基金项目(GY21011)

The effects of prosocial spending on subjective well-being and its mechanism

CUI Xinyue1, LI Bin1,2(), HE Ruwan1, ZHANG Shuying1, LEI Li1
1 Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2 The Institute of Enterprise Development, Jinan University; Guangzhou 510632, China
Received:2020-08-11Online:2021-07-15Published:2021-05-24
Contact:LI Bin E-mail:bingoli@jnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 亲社会支出是指把钱以送礼或慈善捐款的形式花在别人身上, 而不是自己身上。它不仅可以给接受者带来好处, 还可以对给予者的幸福产生积极影响。亲社会支出对幸福感的影响主要体现在亲社会对象及影响效果两个方面, 其边界条件包括了外部与内部因素。通过自我决定理论、社会规范理论、进化理论及社会交换理论, 可以进一步解释亲社会支出影响主观幸福感的内在机制。未来研究需要检验亲社会支出与幸福感之间的边界条件、探究亲社会支出的长期积极效应及提高亲社会支出研究的生态效度。


[1] 陈维扬, 谢天. (2018). 社会规范的动态过程. 心理科学进展, 26(7), 1284-1293.
[2] 李爱梅, 鹿凡凡. (2013). 幸福的体验效用与非理性决策行为的偏差机制. 心理科学进展, 21(6), 1059-1070.
[3] 李斌, 卫海英, 李爱梅, 李方君, 陈晓曦. (2018). 体验性消费与实物性消费的双加工理论模型: 现象, 机制及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 26(5), 761-769.
[4] 刘腾飞, 徐富明, 孙彦, 张军伟, 蒋多. (2010). 基于体验效用的幸福及其测量. 心理科学进展, 18(07), 1087-1095.
[5] 谢晓非, 王逸璐, 顾思义, 李蔚. (2017). 利他仅仅利他吗?——进化视角的双路径模型. 心理科学进展, 25(09), 1441-1455.
[6] 杨莹, 寇彧. (2015). 亲社会互动中的幸福感: 自主性的作用. 心理科学进展, 23(7), 1226-1235.
[7] Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2012). Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well-and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: A longitudinal investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(1), 51-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.008URL
[8] Agerström, J., Carlsson, R., Nicklasson, L., & Guntell, L. (2016). Using descriptive social norms to increase charitable giving: The power of local norms. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 147-153.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2015.12.007URL
[9] Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. P., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., ... Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635-652.
doi: 10.1037/a0031578pmid: 23421360
[10] Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347-355.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5URL
[11] Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Proulx, J., Lok, I., & Norton, M. I. (2020). Does spending money on others promote happiness?: A registered replication report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(2), e15-e26.
[12] Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012). Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLoS One, 7(6), e39211.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039211URL
[13] Aknin, L. B., Sandstrom, G. M., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2011). It's the recipient that counts: Spending money on strong social ties leads to greater happiness than spending on weak social ties. PLoS One, 6(2), e17018.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017018URL
[14] Barrett, L., Dunbar, R., & Lycett, J. (2002). Human evolutionary psychology. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[15] Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. Handbook of Psychology,463-484.
[16] Bernheim, B. D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102(5), 841-877.
doi: 10.1086/261957URL
[17] Binder, M., & Blankenberg, A. K. (2017). Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior?. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 137, 304-323.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.03.009URL
[18] Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193-206.
doi: 10.1111/soin.1964.34.issue-2URL
[19] Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). The diagnostic value of actions in a self-signaling model. The Psychology of Economic Decisions, 1, 105-123.
[20] Boster, F., Fediuk, T., & Ryan Kotowski, M. (2001). The effectiveness of an altruistic appeal in the presence and absence of favors. Communication Monographs, 68(4), 340-346.
doi: 10.1080/03637750128074URL
[21] Cao, Y., Yu, H., Wu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2015). Can money heal all wounds? Social exchange norm modulates the preference for monetary versus social compensation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1411.
[22] Carlson, R. W., Maréchal, M. A., Oud, B., Fehr, E., & Crockett, M. J. (2020). Motivated misremembering of selfish decisions. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1-11.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7URL
[23] Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2010). The relative relativity of material and experiential purchases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 146-159.
doi: 10.1037/a0017145URL
[24] Chen, Y., Yao, M., & Yan, W. (2014). Materialism and well-being among Chinese college students: The mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Journal of Health Psychology, 19(10), 1232-1240.
doi: 10.1177/1359105313488973URL
[25] Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard.
[26] Crocker, J., Canevello, A., & Brown, A. A. (2017). Social motivation: Costs and benefits of selfishness and otherishness. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 299-325.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044145URL
[27] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900.
doi: 10.1177/0149206305279602URL
[28] Curry, O. S., Rowland, L. A., van Lissa, C. J., Zlotowitz, S., McAlaney, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320-329.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014URL
[29] Dainton, M. (2003). Equity and uncertainty in relational maintenance. Western Journal of Communication, 67(2), 164-186.
doi: 10.1080/10570310309374765URL
[30] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182-185.
doi: 10.1037/a0012801URL
[31] Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1-31.
doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.xURL
[32] Dunbar, R. I., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science, 317(5843), 1344-1347.
doi: 10.1126/science.1145463URL
[33] Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687-1688.
doi: 10.1126/science.1150952URL
[34] Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Prosocial spending and happiness: Using money to benefit others pays off. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 41-47.
doi: 10.1177/0963721413512503URL
[35] Dunn, E. W., Ashton-James, C. E., Hanson, M. D., & Aknin, L. B. (2010). On the costs of self-interested economic behavior: How does stinginess get under the skin?. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 627-633.
doi: 10.1177/1359105309356366URL
[36] Dunn, E. W., & Weidman, A. C. (2015). Building a science of spending: Lessons from the past and directions for the future. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(1), 172-178.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.003URL
[37] Dunn, E. W., Whillans, A. V., Norton, M. I., & Aknin, L. B. (2020). Prosocial spending and buying time: Money as a tool for increasing subjective well-being. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 67-126.
[38] Falk, A., & Graeber, T. (2020). Delayed negative effects of prosocial spending on happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(12), 6463-6468.
[39] Fritz, M. M., Walsh, L. C., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2017). Staying happier. In M. D., Robinson, & M., Eid (Eds.), The happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being (pp.95-116). New York, NY: Springer.
[40] Gherghel, C., Nastas, D., Hashimoto, T., Takai, J., & Cargile, A. C. (2020). Culture, morality, and the effect of prosocial behavior motivation on positive affect. Ethics and Behavior, 30(2), 126-149.
doi: 10.1080/10508422.2019.1651651URL
[41] Grant, A., & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor: Are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving?. Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033-1039.
doi: 10.1177/0956797612439424pmid: 22868495
[42] Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404.
doi: 10.1037/a0017346pmid: 20175620
[43] Hamon, R., & Bull, K. S. (2016). “What do you have to offer me?”: A relationship building activity for demonstrating social exchange theory. Family Science Review, 21 (1), 26-40.
[44] Hanniball, K. B., Aknin, L. B., Douglas, K. S., & Viljoen, J. L. (2019). Does helping promote well-being in at-risk youth and ex-offender samples? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 307-317.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.11.001URL
[45] Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., & Wang, S. (2019). Changing world happiness. World Happiness Report 2019, 11-46.
[46] Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340.
pmid: 3615707
[47] Hitokoto, H., & Uchida, Y. (2015). Interdependent happiness: Theoretical importance and measurement validity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 211-239.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9505-8URL
[48] Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
[49] Hui, B. P. H., & Kogan, A. (2018). Daily ups and downs: An event-sampling study of the mediated moderation of prosocial engagement on well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 675-688.
[50] Inagaki, T. K., & Orehek, E. (2017). On the benefits of giving social support: When, why, and how support providers gain by caring for others. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 109-113.
doi: 10.1177/0963721416686212URL
[51] Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
[52] Kasser, T. (2017). Living both well and sustainably: A review of the literature, with some reflections on future research, interventions and policy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375(2095), 20160369.
[53] Kazdin, A. E. (2009). Psychological science’s contributions to a sustainable environment: Extending our reach to a grand challenge of society. American Psychologist, 64(5), 339-356.
doi: 10.1037/a0015685pmid: 19618968
[54] Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., & Butner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110(1), 3-28.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.3URL
[55] Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Preacher, K. J., MacCallum, R. C., Atkinson, C., Malarkey, W. B., & Glaser, R. (2003). Chronic stress and age-related increases in the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(15), 9090-9095.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1531903100URL
[56] Kim, R. Y. (2020). What makes people happy? An empirical investigation of panel data. Applied Economics Letters, 28(2), 91-94.
doi: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1733471URL
[57] Kındap-Tepe, Y., & Aktaş, V. (2019). The mediating role of needs satisfaction for prosocial behavior and autonomy support. Current Psychology,1-13.
[58] Klein, N. (2017). Prosocial behavior increases perceptions of meaning in life. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 354-361.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1209541URL
[59] Klein, N., & O'Brien, E. (2016). The tipping point of moral change: When do good and bad acts make good and bad actors?. Social Cognition, 34(2), 149-166.
doi: 10.1521/soco.2016.34.2.149URL
[60] Klein, N., & O'Brien, E. (2017). The power and limits of personal change: When a bad past does (and does not) inspire in the present. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 210-229.
doi: 10.1037/pspa0000088URL
[61] Ko, K., Margolis, S., Revord, J., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2021). Comparing the effects of performing and recalling acts of kindness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(1), 73-81.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2019.1663252URL
[62] Krekels, G., & Pandelaere, M. (2015,February). How to be both more and less happy: Think like a greedy person! Presented at the Society for Consumer Psychology Annual Winter Conference. Phoenix, Arizona.
[63] Kuykendall, L., Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2015). Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 364-403.
doi: 10.1037/a0038508pmid: 25602273
[64] Lai, W., Yang, Z., Mao, Y., Zhang, Q., Chen, H., & Ma, J. (2020). When do good deeds lead to good feelings? Eudaimonic orientation moderates the happiness benefits of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 4053.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114053URL
[65] Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Kurtz, J. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2017). What triggers prosocial effort? A positive feedback loop between positive activities, kindness, and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 385-398.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1198924URL
[66] Lee-Yoon, A., & Whillans, A. V. (2019). Making seconds count: When valuing time promotes subjective well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 54-57.
doi: S2352-250X(18)30045-9pmid: 29800816
[67] Lok, I., & Dunn, E. W. (2020). Under what conditions does prosocial spending promote happiness?. Collabra: Psychology, 6(1), 5.
doi: 10.1525/collabra.254URL
[68] Lyubomirsky, S. (2010). Hedonic adaptation to positive and negative experiences. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping(pp. 200-226). New York: Oxford University Press.
[69] Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). The benefits of benevolence: Basic psychological needs, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 84(6), 750-764.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.12215pmid: 26249135
[70] Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Distinguishing between basic psychological needs and basic wellness enhancers: The case of beneficence as a candidate psychological need. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 116-133.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-019-09800-xURL
[71] Matz, S. C., Gladstone, J. J., & Stillwell, D. (2016). Money buys happiness when spending fits our personality. Psychological Science, 27(5), 715-725.
doi: 10.1177/0956797616635200URL
[72] Milinski, M., Semmann, D., & Krambeck, H. J. (2002). Reputation helps solve the “tragedy of the commons”. Nature, 415(6870), 424-426.
pmid: 11807552
[73] Minton, E. A., Jeffrey Xie, H., Gurel-Atay, E., & Kahle, L. R. (2018). Greening up because of god: The relations among religion, sustainable consumption & subjective well-being. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(6), 655-663.
doi: 10.1111/ijcs.v42.6URL
[74] Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631-659.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015001URL
[75] Nelson, S. K., Della Porta, M. D., Jacobs Bao, K., Lee, H. J. C., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2015). ‘It’s up to you’: Experimentally manipulated autonomy support for prosocial behavior improves well-being in two cultures over six weeks. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 463-476.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.983959URL
[76] Nelson, S. K., Layous, K., Cole, S. W., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2016). Do unto others or treat yourself? The effects of prosocial and self-focused behavior on psychological flourishing. Emotion, 16(6), 850-861.
doi: 10.1037/emo0000178URL
[77] Newman, G. E., & Cain, D. M. (2014). Tainted altruism: When doing some good is evaluated as worse than doing no good at all. Psychological Science, 25(3), 648-655.
doi: 10.1177/0956797613504785URL
[78] Ng, J. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325-340.
doi: 10.1177/1745691612447309URL
[79] Oarga, C., Stavrova, O., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2015). When and why is helping others good for well‐being? The role of belief in reciprocity and conformity to society's expectations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 242-254.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.v45.2URL
[80] O'Brien, E., & Kassirer, S. (2019). People are slow to adapt to the warm glow of giving. Psychological Science, 30(2), 193-204.
doi: 10.1177/0956797618814145pmid: 30589618
[81] O'Neill, D. (2020). Effects of motivation for prosocial spending on subsequent positive affect (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Toronto.
[82] Pătra, L., Martínez-Tur, V., Gracia, E., & Moliner, C. (2019). Why do people spend money to help vulnerable people? PLoS ONE, 14(3), 1-18.
[83] Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology., 56, 365-392.
pmid: 15709940
[84] Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
[85] Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2007). Correlates of physical health of informal caregivers: A meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(2), 126-137.
[86] Rinner, M. T. B. (2019). Giving=Receiving? The outcome of prosocial behavior within and between clinical and non-clinical individuals, and couples (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). University of Basel.
[87] Ross, S. (2011). Egoism and the everyday consumer: Developing a new theory on prosocial behaviors in consumption contexts. Am Mark Assoc Summer (pp.165-172)
[88] Rudd, M., Aaker, J., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Getting the most out of giving: Concretely framing a prosocial goal maximizes happiness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 11-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.002URL
[89] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
pmid: 11392867
[90] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2015). Self-determination theory. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://www.selfdeterminationtheory.org/.
[91] Schmitt, M. T., Aknin, L. B., Axsen, J., & Shwom, R. L. (2018). Unpacking the relationships between pro-environmental behavior, life satisfaction, and perceived ecological threat. Ecological Economics, 143, 130-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007URL
[92] Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2015). Power decreases trust in social exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(42), 12950-12955.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517057112URL
[93] Sellen, C. (2019). Is philanthropy a way for the wealthy to convert wealth into happiness? Preliminary exploration in France. In G. Brulé & C. Suter (Eds.),Wealth(s) and subjective well-being (pp.247-278). New York, NY: Springer.
[94] Sheldon, K. M. (2014). Becoming oneself: The central role of self-concordant goal selection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(4), 349-365.
doi: 10.1177/1088868314538549pmid: 24981515
[95] Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482-497.
pmid: 10101878
[96] Shin, L. J., Layous, K., Choi, I., Na, S., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2019). Good for self or good for others? The well-being benefits of kindness in two cultures depend on how the kindness is framed. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(6), 795-805.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2019.1651894URL
[97] Stavrova, O., Fetchenhauer, D., & Schlösser, T. (2012). Cohabitation, gender, and happiness: A cross-cultural study in thirty countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(7), 1063-1081.
doi: 10.1177/0022022111419030URL
[98] Stutzer, A., & Lalive, R. (2004). The role of social work norms in job searching and subjective well-being. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(4), 696-719.
doi: 10.1162/1542476041423331URL
[99] Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
doi: 10.1086/406755URL
[100] Uchida, Y., Norasakkunkit, V., & Kitayama, S. (2004). Cultural constructions of happiness: Theory and emprical evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 223-239.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-004-8785-9URL
[101] van der Slik, J. (2007). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism (Book Review). Pro Rege, 35(4), 41-43.
[102] van Schie, S., Güntert, S. T., Oostlander, J., & Wehner, T. (2015). How the organizational context impacts volunteers: A differentiated perspective on self-determined motivation. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1570-1590.
doi: 10.1007/s11266-014-9472-zURL
[103] Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., de Witte, H., & van den Broeck, A. (2007). On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 251-277.
doi: 10.1348/096317906X111024URL
[104] van Vugt, M., Roberts, G., & Hardy, C. (2007). Competitive altruism: Development of reputation-based cooperation in groups. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds). Handbook of evolutionary psychology(pp.531-540). Oxford University Press.
[105] Wang, X., & Tong, L. (2015). Hide the light or let it shine? Examining the factors influencing the effect of publicizing donations on donors’ happiness. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(4), 418-424.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.06.001URL
[106] Wang, Y., Ge, J., Zhang, H., Wang, H., & Xie, X. (2020). Altruistic behaviors relieve physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(2), 950-958.
[107] Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
doi: 10.2307/25148667URL
[108] Wedekind, C., & Braithwaite, V. A. (2002). The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity. Current Biology, 12(12), 1012-1015.
pmid: 12123575
[109] Wiwad, D., & Aknin, L. B. (2017). Motives matter: The emotional consequences of recalled self- and other-focused prosocial acts. Motivation and Emotion, 41(6), 730-740.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-017-9638-2URL
[110] Xiao, J. J., & Li, H. (2011). Sustainable consumption and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 323-329.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9746-9URL
[111] Yamaguchi, M., Masuchi, A., Nakanishi, D., Suga, S., Konishi, N., Yu, Y. Y., & Ohtsubo, Y. (2016). Experiential purchases and prosocial spending promote happiness by enhancing social relationships. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 480-488.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1117128URL
[112] Zhang, W., Chen, M., Xie, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2018). Prosocial spending and subjective well-being: The recipient perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(8), 2267-2281.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-017-9918-2URL




[1]陈晨, 刘玉新, 赵晨. 独立、协同和平衡视角下的单维式基本心理需要满足[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2076-2090.
[2]谢书书, 张积家. 颜色类别知觉效应的机制:语言的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1384-1393.
[3]张春虎. 基于自我决定理论的工作动机研究脉络及未来走向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1489-1506.
[4]柴唤友, 牛更枫, 褚晓伟, 魏 祺, 宋玉红, 孙晓军. 错失恐惧:我又错过了什么?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 527-537.
[5]丁凤琴, 赵虎英. 感恩的个体主观幸福感更强?—— 一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(10): 1749-1763.
[6]徐富明, 张慧, 马红宇, 邓颖, 史燕伟, 李欧. 贫困问题:基于心理学的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1431-1440.
[7]杨小莉;刘潇肖;白宝玉. 身高的心理效应及其内在机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 857-865.
[8]刘陈陵;王芸. 来访者动机:心理咨询与治疗理论与实践的整合[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(2): 261-269.
[9]靳宇倡;何明成;李俊一. 生命意义与主观幸福感的关系:基于中国样本的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(12): 1854-1863.
[10]李爱梅;李晓萍;高结怡;彭元;夏萤. 追求积极情绪可能导致消极后果及其机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(6): 979-989.
[11]顾佳旎;孟慧;范津砚. 社会自我效能感的结构、测量及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(11): 1791-1800.
[12]姚唐;郑秋莹;李惠璠;邱琪;曹花蕊;吴瑞林. Web 2.0环境中顾客参与的实现型快乐感形成机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(8): 1347-1356.
[13]宋佳萌;范会勇. 社会支持与主观幸福感关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(8): 1357-1370.
[14]范富霞;吕厚超. 情感适应的心理机制:AREA模型[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(4): 653-663.
[15]王娟;张积家. 颜色词与颜色认知的关系—— 基于民族心理学的研究视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(8): 1159-1168.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5510
相关话题/心理 科学 社会 暨南大学 心理学

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 前瞻性情绪作为社会风险的信息源假说:公共场景下风险决策的情绪及文化机制探讨
    王晓田1(),王娜2,何金波11香港中文大学人文社科学院,广东深圳5181722韩山师范学院教育科学学院,广东潮州521041收稿日期:2020-12-21出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:王晓田E-mail:xtwang@cuhk.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 面孔社会知觉中的表情效应
    李雅宁1,2,田杨阳1,吴琦1,冷海州1,蒋重清1(),杨伊生21辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连1160292内蒙古师范大学心理学院,呼和浩特010022收稿日期:2020-04-11出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:蒋重清E-mail:jzqcjj@hotmail. ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 成熟对青春期型反社会行为的影响
    林爽,刘文(),王薇薇,张雪辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连116029收稿日期:2020-07-06出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:刘文E-mail:wenliu703@126.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目“留守儿童社会适应促进与反社会预防研究”(19Z ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人们如何设想未来:未来情景思维对个体心理和行为的影响
    卢蕾安,王春生,任俊()浙江师范大学教育与人类发展学院心理系,金华321004收稿日期:2020-07-09出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:任俊E-mail:drinren@163.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划教育学一般课题“基于积极心理学理念 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 姓名对个体心理与行为的实际影响:证据和理论
    包寒吴霜,蔡华俭()中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京100101中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2020-09-02出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:蔡华俭E-mail:caihj@psych.ac.cn基金资助:国家社会科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 傅斯年的心理学探索及其贡献
    陈彦垒(),胡志坚聊城大学教育科学学院,山东聊城252059收稿日期:2020-08-13出版日期:2021-06-15发布日期:2021-04-25通讯作者:陈彦垒E-mail:chenyanlei@lcu.edu.cn基金资助:聊城市社科规划专项(ZXYB202002019)FuSsu-nien ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 空间交互研究新视角:多重社会因素的影响
    肖承丽(),隋雨檠,肖苏衡,周仁来()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-07-03出版日期:2021-05-15发布日期:2021-03-30通讯作者:肖承丽,周仁来E-mail:xiaocl@nju.edu.cn;rlzhou@nju.edu.cn基金资助:江苏高校哲学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于社交媒体数据的心理指标识别建模: 机器学习的方法
    苏悦1,2,刘明明1,3,赵楠1,刘晓倩1,朱廷劭1,2()1中国科学院心理研究所,北京1001012中国科学院大学心理学系,北京1000493联想研究院,北京100094收稿日期:2020-01-14出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22基金资助:国家社科基金重点项目(17A ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人际互动中社会学习的计算神经机制
    黎穗卿,陈新玲,翟瑜竹,张怡洁,章植鑫,封春亮()教育部脑认知与教育科学重点实验室(华南师范大学);华南师范大学心理学院;华南师范大学心理应用研究中心;华南师范大学广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室,广州510631收稿日期:2020-08-10出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于游戏的心理测评
    徐俊怡,李中权()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-05-24出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李中权E-mail:zqli@nju.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社科规划基金项目(20YJA190004);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01