删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

拖延行为的发展认知机制及神经基础

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

冯廷勇, 王雪珂, 苏缇()
西南大学心理学部, 重庆 400715
收稿日期:2020-06-12出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22


基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(31971026);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(SWU2009104);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(SWU1909445);2020年度教育部教育科学基础研究项目资助

Developmental cognitive mechanism and neural basis of procrastination

FENG Tingyong, WANG Xueke, SU Ti()
Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
Received:2020-06-12Online:2021-04-15Published:2021-02-22







摘要/Abstract


摘要: 拖延是指尽管预见到拖延会带来不利后果, 人们仍自愿推迟开始或完成某一计划好的任务。研究表明, 不同文化背景下有15%~20%的成年人存在慢性拖延, 超过70%的学生承认自己存在学业拖延, 部分学生还会形成特质性拖延。严重的拖延不仅影响人们的学业、工作和生活, 甚至还会危害到人们的身心健康。鉴于目前对于拖延产生的核心机制、形成的关键期以及发展认知神经机制还不是很清楚, 本项目拟从拖延的时间决策理论出发, 首先系统探明拖延决策的核心机制, 尤其是远期价值评估、延迟折扣和自我控制能力等在拖延决策过程中的认知加工机制和神经基础; 其次结合行为-环境变量-脑的多模态数据, 从发展角度探究拖延形成的关键期(敏感期)、影响因素以及发展认知神经机制; 最后从行为干预和脑的可塑性角度出发, 试图制定各关键年龄阶段拖延预防与干预的临床方案。本研究的开展对于把握拖延形成的认知机制、神经基础及其发展规律具有重要的科学价值, 对于拖延行为的预防和干预也具有直接的现实意义。



图1拖延的时间决策模型(资料来源:Zhang & Feng, 2019; S. Zhang et al. 2019) 注:被试在接收任务的同时会产生实时任务厌恶(real-time task aversivness), 和实时任务结果效用(real-time outcome utility)。通常, 被试不会立即执行任务, 而是会预期任务厌恶(Task-delay aversiveness)会在随着时间流逝在未来某段时间内有所下降, 但预期的任务过程效用(Task-delay outcome utility)的评估权重由于离任务截止日期较远会被逐渐折扣。此时, 被试会有一个预期的, 较短的拖延时间(the expected delay)。然而, 事实上, 实时的任务厌恶(real-time task aversivness)并不会呈持续下降的变化趋势, 就像今天和一个星期后的考试, 个体所感知的实际痛苦或厌恶程度可能相等, 因此, 实时的任务厌恶程度可能呈水平趋势变化。而实时的任务结果效用(real-time outcome utility)则随着任务截止日期的临近, 缓慢增长。当在某一时间点上, 实时的任务结果效用接近任务厌恶的评估权重时, 由刚开始接收任务到这个时间点的时间才是被试实际拖延的时间(the actual delay)。
图1拖延的时间决策模型(资料来源:Zhang & Feng, 2019; S. Zhang et al. 2019) 注:被试在接收任务的同时会产生实时任务厌恶(real-time task aversivness), 和实时任务结果效用(real-time outcome utility)。通常, 被试不会立即执行任务, 而是会预期任务厌恶(Task-delay aversiveness)会在随着时间流逝在未来某段时间内有所下降, 但预期的任务过程效用(Task-delay outcome utility)的评估权重由于离任务截止日期较远会被逐渐折扣。此时, 被试会有一个预期的, 较短的拖延时间(the expected delay)。然而, 事实上, 实时的任务厌恶(real-time task aversivness)并不会呈持续下降的变化趋势, 就像今天和一个星期后的考试, 个体所感知的实际痛苦或厌恶程度可能相等, 因此, 实时的任务厌恶程度可能呈水平趋势变化。而实时的任务结果效用(real-time outcome utility)则随着任务截止日期的临近, 缓慢增长。当在某一时间点上, 实时的任务结果效用接近任务厌恶的评估权重时, 由刚开始接收任务到这个时间点的时间才是被试实际拖延的时间(the actual delay)。



图2项目的研究框架与技术路线图
图2项目的研究框架与技术路线图







[1] 蔡曙光, 张笑, 冯廷勇. (2016). “先扬后抑”vs.“先抑后扬”: 反馈顺序对决策信心建构的影响. 心理科学, 39(3),686-692.
[2] 陈婉东. (2015). 任务具体化对学业拖延的改善作用 (硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学.
[3] 楚翘, 肖蓉, 林倩. (2010). 大学生拖延行为状况与特点研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 18(8),970-972.
[4] 侯智慧, 闻素霞. (2014). 时间管理训练对初中学习拖延者的干预研究. 科教导刊(上旬刊), (6),242-243.
[5] 李洋. (2010). 大学生学习拖延及干预研究 (硕士学位论文). 天津大学.
[6] 林崇德. (2009). 发展心理学.第2版 北京: 人民教育出版社.
[7] 蒙茜, 郑涌. (2006). 拖延研究述评. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), (4),15-18.
[8] 宋梅歌, 冯廷勇. (2017). 时间洞察力对拖延行为的影响机制:时间折扣的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(6),1216-1225.
[9] 宋梅歌, 苏缇, 冯廷勇. (2015). 拖延行为的时间取向模型. 心理科学进展, 23(7),1216-1225.
[10] 苏缇, 郭逸群, 陈志毅, 张顺民, 黄希庭, 冯廷勇. (2018). 拖延的脑机制:基于大尺度脑网络的分析. 中国科学, 48,1-12.
[11] 王洁洁. (2016). 时间管理训练对初中生学习拖延的干预研究 (硕士学位论文). 重庆师范大学.
[12] 王亚琳. (2014). 自我控制团体辅导对研究生学业拖延的改善. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(2),208-210.
[13] 魏佳明, 冯廷勇. (2019). 预期想象对拖延的影响: 想象过程和想象结果的效应分离. 心理科学, 42(3),619-625.
[14] 张顺民, 冯廷勇. (2017). 拖延的决策模型. 心理科学, 40(5),1242-1247.
[15] 左艳梅. (2010). 中学生学业拖延的问卷编制及其与父母教养方式的关系研究 (硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
[16] Ackerman, D. S., & Gross, B. L. (2005). My instructor made me do it: Task characteristics of procrastination. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1),5-13.
[17] Benoit, R. G., Gilbert, S. J., & Burgess, P. W. (2011). A neural mechanism mediating the impact of episodic prospection on farsighted decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(18),6771-6779.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6559-10.2011URLpmid: 21543607
[18] Blouin-Hudon, E. C., & Pychyl, T. A. (2015). Experiencing the temporally extended self: Initial support for the role of affective states, vivid mental imagery, and future self-continuity in the prediction of academic procrastination. Personality & Individual Differences, 86,50-56.
[19] Chen, Z., Liu, P., Zhang, C., & Feng, T. (2020). Brain morphological dynamics of procrastination: The crucial role of the self-control, emotional, and episodic prospection network. Cerebral Cortex, 30(5),2834-2853.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz278URLpmid: 31845748
[20] Chen, Z., Zhang, R., Xu, T., Yang, Y., Wang, J., & Feng, T. (2020). Emotional attitudes towards procrastination in people: A large-scale sentiment-focused crawling analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 110,106391. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106391.
[21] Choi, J. N., & Moran, S. V. (2009). Why not procrastinate? Development and validation of a new active procrastination scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2),195-212.
[22] Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M., Nitschke, J., Larson, C., Schaefer, H., & Dalton, K. (2002). Probing the circuitry of emotion, emotion regulation and affective style. Psychophysiology, 39,15-25.
[23] Deniz, M. E., Tras, Z., & Aydogan, D. (2009). An investigation of academic procrastination, locus of control, and emotional intelligence. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(2),623-632.
[24] Digdon, N. L., & Howell, A. J. (2008). College students who have an eveningness preference report lower self‐control and greater procrastination. Chronobiology International, 25(6),1029-1046.
[25] Elliot, R. (2002). A ten-year study of procrastination stability (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Louisiana. Monroe.
[26] Esteban, R. C., & Ramírez, A. (2014). Procrastination and demographic characteristics associated with college students. Tehran University Medical Journal, 72(2),113-120.
[27] Ferrari, J. R., O'Callaghan, J., & Newbegin, I. (2005). Prevalence of procrastination in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia: Arousal and avoidance delays among adults. North American Journal of Psychology, 7(1),1-6.
[28] Figner, B., Knoch, D., Johnson, E. J., Krosch, A. R., Lisanby, S. H., Fehr, E., & Weber, E. U. (2010). Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13(5),538-539.
URLpmid: 20348919
[29] Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O'Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature,40(2),351-401.
[30] Giedd, J. N., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N. O., Castellanos, F. X., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., Rapoport, J. L. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience, 2(10),861-863.
URLpmid: 10491603
[31] Gustavson, D. E., Miyake, A., Hewitt, J. K., & Friedman, N. P. (2014). Genetic relations among procrastination, impulsivity, and goal-management ability: Implications for the evolutionary origin of procrastination. Psychological Science, 25(6),1178-1188.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614526260URLpmid: 24705635
[32] Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2009). Self-Control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science, 324(5927),646-648.
URLpmid: 19407204
[33] Harriott, J., & Ferrari, J. R. (1996). Prevalence of procrastination among samples of adults. Psychological Reports, 78(2),611-616.
[34] Hu, Y., Liu, P., Guo, Y., & Feng, T. (2018). The neural substrates of procrastination: A voxel-based morphometry study. Brain & Cognition, 121,11-16.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.01.001URLpmid: 29309854
[35] Jackson, T., Fritch, A., Nagasaka, T., & Pope, L. (2003). Procrastination and perceptions of past, present, and future. Individual Differences Research, 1(1),17-28.
[36] Klassen, R. M., Ang, R. P., Chong, W. H., Krawchuk, L. L., Huan, V. S., Wong, I.Y. F., & Yeo, L. S. (2010). Academic procrastination in two settings: Motivation correlates, behavioral patterns, and negative impact of procrastination in Canada and Singapore. Applied Psychology-an International Review (Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale), 59(3),361-379.
[37] Lay, C. H. (1986). At last, my research article on procrastination. Journal of Research in Personality, 20(4),474-495.
[38] Lenroot, R. K., Gogtay, N., Greenstein, D. K., Wells, E. M., Wallace, G. L., Clasen, L. S.… Giedd, J. N., (2007). Sexual dimorphism of brain developmental trajectories during childhood and adolescence. Neuroimage, 36(4),1065-1073.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.053URLpmid: 17513132
[39] Liu, L., Feng, T., Chen, J., Li, H., & Rao, H. (2013). The value of emotion: How does episodic prospection modulate delay discounting? Plos One, 8(11),1717-1718.
[40] Liu, P., & Feng, T. (2017). The overlapping brain region accounting for the relationship between procrastination and impulsivity: A voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroscience, 360,9-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.042URL
[41] McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306(5695),503-507.
URLpmid: 15486304
[42] Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2008). Cognitive emotion regulation: Insights from social cognitive and affective neuroscience. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(2),153-158.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00566.xURLpmid: 25425765
[43] Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2010). Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions. Neuron, 66(1),138-148.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.026URLpmid: 20399735
[44] Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2011). The neural mechanisms of inter-temporal decision-making: Understanding variability. Trends in cognitive sciences, 15(5),227-239.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.002URLpmid: 21497544
[45] Procee, R., Kamphorst, B. A., van Wissen, A., & Meyer, J. J. C (2013). A Formal Model of Procrastination. Paper presented at the Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence,
[46] Rebetez, M.M. L., Barsics, C., Rochat, L., D'Argembeau, A., & van der Linden, M. (2016). Procrastination, consideration of future consequences, and episodic future thinking. Consciousness & Cognition, 42(5),286-292.
[47] Sirois, F. (2007). "I'll look after my health, later": A replication and extension of the procrastination-health model with community-dwelling adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1),15-16.
[48] Sirois, F. M. (2014). Absorbed in the moment? An investigation of procrastination, absorption and cognitive failures. Personality & Individual Differences, 71,30-34.
[49] Sirois, F., & Pychyl, T. (2013). Procrastination and the priority of short-term mood regulation: Consequences for future self. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7(2),115-127.
[50] Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination-frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4),503-509.
[51] Stead, R., Shanahan, M. J., & Neufeld, R. W. J. (2010). “I'll go to therapy, eventually”: Procrastination, stress and mental health. Personality & Individual Differences, 49(3),175-180.
[52] Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1),65-94.
URLpmid: 17201571
[53] Steel, P. (2010). The procrastination equation: How to stop putting things off and start getting stuff done. Toronto: Random House Canada.
[54] Steel, P., & Ferrari, J. (2013). Sex, education and procrastination: An epidemiological study of procrastinators' characteristics from a global sample. European Journal of Personality, 27(1),51-58.
[55] Steel, P., & K?nig, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review,31(4),889-913.
[56] Strunk, K. K., Cho, Y. J., Steele, M. R., & Bridges, S. L. (2013). Development and validation of a 2×2 model of time-related academic behavior: Procrastination and timely engagement. Learning & Individual Differences, 25,35-44.
[57] Thakkar, N. (2009). Why procrastinate: An investigation of the root causes behind procrastination. Lethbridge Undergraduate Research Journal, 4(2)
[58] Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. F. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,80(1),53-67.
URLpmid: 11195891
[59] W?schle, K., Allgaier, A., Lachner, A., Fink, S., & Nückles, M. (2014). Procrastination and self-efficacy: Tracing vicious and virtuous circles in self-regulated learning. Learning & Instruction, 29,103-114.
[60] Wu, H., Gui, D., Lin, W., Gu, R., Zhu, X., & Xun, L. (2016). The procrastinators want it now: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence of the procrastination of intertemporal choices. Brain & Cognition, 107,16-23.
URLpmid: 27363005
[61] Wu, Y., Li, L., Yuan, B., & Tian, X. (2016). Individual differences in resting-state functional connectivity predict procrastination. Personality & Individual Differences, 95,62-67.
[62] Zhang, C., Ni, Y., & Feng, T. (2017). The effect of regulatory mode on procrastination: Bi-stable parahippocampus connectivity with dorsal anterior cingulate and anterior prefrontal cortex. Behavioural Brain Research, 329,51-57.
URLpmid: 28442352
[63] Zhang, R., Chen, Z., Xu, T., Zhang, L., & Feng, T. (2020). The overlapping region in right hippocampus accounting for the link between trait anxiety and procrastination. Neuropsychologia, 146,107571. doi: 10.1016/ j.neuropsychologia.2020.107571.
URLpmid: 32721496
[64] Zhang, S., Becker, B., Chen, Q., & Feng, T. (2018). Insufficient task-outcome association promotes task procrastination through a decrease of hippocampal-striatal interaction. Human Brain Mapping, 40(2),597-607.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.24397URLpmid: 30251755
[65] Zhang, S., & Feng, T. (2019). Modeling procrastination: Asymmetric decisions to act between the present and the future. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 149(2),311-322.
doi: 10.1037/xge0000643URLpmid: 31259598
[66] Zhang, S., Liu, P., & Feng, T. (2019). To do it now or later: The cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates underlying procrastination. Wires Cognitive Science, 10(4),e1492.
URLpmid: 30638308
[67] Zhang, S., Peng, J., Qin, L., Suo, T., & Feng, T. (2018). Prospective emotion enables episodic prospection to shift time preference. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3),487-499.
URLpmid: 29341113
[68] Zhang, W., Wang, X., & Feng, T. (2016). Identifying the neural substrates of procrastination: A resting-state fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 6,e33203.
[69] Zuo, X., He, Y., Betzel, R. F., Colcombe, S., Sporns, O., & Milham, M. P. (2017). Human connectomics across the life span. Trends Cognitive Science,21(1),32-45.




[1]王晓田, 王娜, 何金波. 前瞻性情绪作为社会风险的信息源假说:公共场景下风险决策的情绪及文化机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 959-966.
[2]包寒吴霜, 蔡华俭. 姓名对个体心理与行为的实际影响:证据和理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1067-1085.
[3]霍超, 李祚山, 孟景. 自闭症谱系障碍个体的共情干预:扬长还是补短?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 849-863.
[4]任小云, 段锦云, 冯成志. 个体采纳与群体采纳:决策过程中的两类建议采纳行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 549-559.
[5]王祯. 儿童的性别刻板印象威胁及其干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 276-285.
[6]屈国梁, 曹晓君. 同胞冲突及其解决:家庭子系统的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 286-295.
[7]段文杰, 李玉梅, 何啊龙, 吴桐. 基于未感染者与感染者双重视角的艾滋病污名[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 323-337.
[8]沈蕾, 江黛苔, 陈宁, 刘伟. 自豪感的神经基础:比较的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 131-139.
[9]杨玲, 刘文鑫, 张炀, 张建勋, 牛禄霖. 物质成瘾领域延迟折扣研究中的外部效度问题[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 140-149.
[10]黄龙, 徐富明, 胡笑羽. 眼动轨迹匹配法:一种研究决策过程的新方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1454-1461.
[11]陈国典, 杨通平. 正念对亲密关系的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1551-1563.
[12]张银花, 李红, 吴寅. 计算模型在道德认知研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1042-1055.
[13]徐富明, 黄龙, 张慧, 相鹏, 刘腾飞, 李亚红. 行为贫困陷阱的心理机制与管理对策:基于认知与动机双视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 681-691.
[14]李庆功, 王震炎, 孙捷元, 师妍. 网约车场景中声誉和面孔可信度对女性信任判断的影响以及直觉性思维的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 746-751.
[15]张紫琦, 贺则宇, 罗文波, 伍海燕. 元认知中自信心对联合决策的预测作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 604-611.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5404
相关话题/心理 科学 神经 过程 论文

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 抑制引起的遗忘及其神经机制
    关旭旭,王红波()河南大学认知、脑与健康研究所;河南大学心理与行为研究所;河南大学教育科学学院,开封475004收稿日期:2020-05-06出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究项目(20YJC190019)Neuralmechanismsof ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 创造力产生过程中的神经振荡机制
    叶超群,林郁泓,刘春雷()曲阜师范大学心理学院,山东曲阜273165收稿日期:2020-03-10出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02-22基金资助:山东省自然科学基金面上项目(ZR2019MC048);曲阜师范大学研究生学位论文科研创新资助基金项目Neuraloscillatio ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人际互动中社会学习的计算神经机制
    黎穗卿,陈新玲,翟瑜竹,张怡洁,章植鑫,封春亮()教育部脑认知与教育科学重点实验室(华南师范大学);华南师范大学心理学院;华南师范大学心理应用研究中心;华南师范大学广东省心理健康与认知科学重点实验室,广州510631收稿日期:2020-08-10出版日期:2021-04-15发布日期:2021-02 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于游戏的心理测评
    徐俊怡,李中权()南京大学社会学院心理学系,南京210023收稿日期:2020-05-24出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李中权E-mail:zqli@nju.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社科规划基金项目(20YJA190004);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 听而不“闻”?人声失认症的神经机制
    周爱保,胡砚冰(),周滢鑫,李玉,李文一,张号博,郭彦麟,胡国庆西北师范大学心理学院,兰州730070收稿日期:2020-06-10出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:胡砚冰E-mail:hybpsy2018@163.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金地区项目(316 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 注意过程中的行为振荡现象
    章小丹1,张沥今1,丁玉珑2,曲折1()1中山大学心理学系,广州5100062华南师范大学心理学院,广州510631收稿日期:2020-07-05出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:曲折E-mail:quzhe@mail.sysu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 幸灾乐祸的重新审视和互动过程模型的构想
    张衍1,王俊秀1,席居哲2,3()1中国社会科学院社会学所,北京1007322华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海市心理健康与危机干预重点实验室,上海2000623华东师范大学附属精神卫生中心,上海200335收稿日期:2020-07-28出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 恐惧管理理论的争议及其对死亡心理研究的启示
    孟祥寒1,李强1,2(),周彦榜1,王进31南开大学社会心理学系,天津3003502南开大学滨海学院,天津3002703天津职业技术师范大学,天津300222收稿日期:2020-02-29出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:李强E-mail:liqiangp@126 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 敬畏的心理模型及其认知神经机制
    赵小红1,2,童薇3,陈桃林1,2(),吴冬梅4,张蕾1,2,陈正举1,方晓义3,龚启勇1,2,唐小蓉21四川大学华西医院放射科华西磁共振研究中心,成都6100412四川大学公共管理学院社会学与心理学系,成都6100653北京师范大学心理学部,北京1008754成都市第四人民医院,成都610036收 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人们何以能够“舍生取义”?基于保护性价值观认知神经机制的解释
    岳童1,黄希庭1(),傅安国21西南大学心理学与社会发展研究中心;西南大学心理学部,重庆4007152海南大学管理学院;海南省公司治理研究院,海口570228收稿日期:2020-06-02出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:黄希庭E-mail:xthuang@swu ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01