
1. 湖南师范大学认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室
2. 湖南师范大学心理系, 长沙 410081
收稿日期:
2018-01-19出版日期:
2018-12-15发布日期:
2018-10-30通讯作者:
李晓明E-mail:2007@sohu.com基金资助:
*湖南省哲学社会科学基金资助(13YBA220)Applied research on framing effect and related techniques
LI Xiao-Ming1,2(
1. Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province
2. Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Received:
2018-01-19Online:
2018-12-15Published:
2018-10-30Contact:
LI Xiao-Ming E-mail:2007@sohu.com摘要/Abstract
摘要: 个体的决策及偏好常会因信息的表达方式而变, 研究者将这种违背期望效用理论不变性的现象称之为“框架效应”。框架效应体现了人类非理性决策的普遍性, 也为合理利用人类的决策特点以干预其决策行为提供了重要契机。本文总结了框架效应在健康行为、市场营销及环保领域中的应用研究, 着重分析了数量信息的表达技巧, 如风险信息的呈现、数量单位的选择以及图形的物理属性设计, 旨在探讨如何在实践过程中通过变化信息呈现方式以实现对人类决策行为的重要影响。
图/表 2

图1突显存储容量维度的版本


图2突显返修率维度的版本

参考文献 67
1 | 李晓明, 和平, 刘林英 . ( 2016). 风险回避行为中的“红色图形效应”. 心理科学进展, 24, 351-355. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00351URL |
2 | 李晓明, 刘心阁 . ( 2013). 图形表征的物理突显性对风险回避行为的影响. 心理科学, 36( 6), 1383-1387. |
3 | 刘扬, 孙彦 . ( 2014). 行为决策中框架效应研究新思路——从风险决策到跨期决策, 从言语框架到图形框架. 心理科学进展, 22( 8), 1205-1217. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01205URL |
4 | 史燕伟, 徐富明, 李燕, 刘程浩, 李彬 . ( 2014). 公共决策中的框架效应: 理论解释及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 22( 8), 1303-1311. |
5 | 孙彦, 黄莉, 刘扬 . ( 2012). 决策中的图形框架效应. 心理科学进展, 20( 11), 1718-1726. |
6 | 文桂婵, 徐富明, 于会会, 黄宝珍, 王岚 . ( 2011). 特征框架效应的心理机制与影响因素. 心理科学进展, 19( 12), 1822-1833. |
7 | Bagchi, R., &Davis, D.F . ( 2012). $29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? How presentation order affects package perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 1), 62-73. doi: 10.1086/661893URL |
8 | Bertolotti M., Chirchiglia G., & Catellani P . ( 2016). Promoting change in meat consumption among the elderly: Factual and prefactual framing of health and well-being. Appetite, 106( 1), 37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.150URLpmid: 26924560 |
9 | Burson K. A., Larrick R. P., & Lynch J. G . ( 2009). Six of one, half dozen of the other. Psychological Science, 20( 9), 1074-1078. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.182URLpmid: 23070413 |
10 | Cesario J., Corker K. S., & Jelinek S . ( 2013). A self-regulatory framework for message framing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 2), 238-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.014URL |
11 | Cesario J., Grant H., & Higgins E. T . ( 2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86( 3), 388-404. |
12 | Chan, E., &Mukhopadhyay, A . ( 2010). When choosing makes a good thing better: Temporal variations in the valuation of hedonic consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 47( 3), 497-507. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.47.3.497URL |
13 | Churchill S., Good A., & Pavey L . ( 2014). Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks. The role of temporal message framing and eating self-efficacy. Appetite, 80( 9), 131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.008URLpmid: 24842596 |
14 | Corbin J., McElroy T., & Black C . ( 2010). Memory reflected in our decisions: Higher working memory capacity predicts greater bias in risky choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 5( 2), 110-115. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9505-xURL |
15 | De Heus P., Hoogervorst N., & van Dijk E . ( 2010). Framing prisoners and chickens: Valence effects in the prisoner’s dilemma and the chicken game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 5), 736-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.013URL |
16 | Freling T. H., Vincent L. H., & Henard D. H . ( 2014). When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124( 2), 95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.12.007URL |
17 | Gallagher, K.M., &Updegraff, J.A . ( 2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43( 1), 101-116. |
18 | Gallagher K. M., Updegraff J. A., Rothman A. J., & Sims L . ( 2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain-and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30( 2), 145-152. doi: 10.1037/a0022264URLpmid: 21401248 |
19 | Gamliel, E., &Kreiner, H . ( 2013). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The interaction of visual display and attribute representation in attenuating framing bias. Judgment and Decision Making, 8( 4), 482-491. |
20 | Ganegoda, D.B., &Folger, R . ( 2015). Framing effects in justice perceptions: Prospect theory and counterfactuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.002URL |
21 | Garcia-Retamero, R., &Cokely, E.T . ( 2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17( 3), 270-287. doi: 10.1037/a0023677URLpmid: 21942316 |
22 | Garcia-Retamero, R., &Cokely, E.T . ( 2014). The influence of skills, message frame, and visual aids on prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27( 2), 179-189. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1797URL |
23 | Garcia-Retamero, R., &Galesic, M . ( 2010). How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25( 12), 1323-1329. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1484-9URLpmid: 2988162 |
24 | Haerem T., Kuvaas B., Bakken B. T., & Karlsen T . ( 2011). Do military decision makers behave as predicted by prospect theory? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24( 5), 482-497. doi: 10.1002/bdm.704URL |
25 | Higgins, E.T. ( 1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52( 12), 1280-1300. |
26 | Hong F., Hossain T., & List J. A . ( 2015). Framing manipulations in contests: a natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 118, 372-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.014URL |
27 | Huang, Y., &Wang, L . ( 2010). Sex differences in framing effects across task domain. Personality and Individual Differences, 48( 5), 649-653. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.005URL |
28 | Hurlstone M. J., Lewandowsky S., Newell B. R., & Sewell B . ( 2014). The effect of framing and normative messages in building support for climate policies. Plos One, 9( 12), e114335-e114335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114335URLpmid: 4266503 |
29 | Isaac, M.S., &Poor, M . ( 2016). The sleeper framing effect: The influence of frame valence on immediate and retrospective judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26( 1), 53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.002URL |
30 | Jasper J. D., Fournier C., & Christman S. D . ( 2014). Handedness differences in information framing. Brain and Cognition, 84( 1), 85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.11.006URLpmid: 24326298 |
31 | Jin, H.J., &Han, D.H . ( 2014). Interaction between message framing and consumers’ prior subjective knowledge regarding food safety issues. Food Policy, 44, 95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.007URL |
32 | Kanner, M.D. ( 2004). Framing and the role of the second actor: An application of prospect theory to bargaining. Political Psychology, 25( 2), 213-239. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00369.xURL |
33 | Khan, U., &Dhar, R . ( 2010). Price-framing effects on the purchase of hedonic and utilitarian bundles. Journal of Marketing Research, 47( 6), 1090-1099. |
34 | Kliger, D., &Gilad, D . ( 2012). Red light, green light: Color priming in financial decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41( 5), 738-745. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2012.07.003URL |
35 | Knoll L. J., Magis-Weinberg L., Speekenbrink M., & Blakemore S. J . ( 2015). Social influence on risk perception during adolescence. Psychological Science, 26( 5), 583-592. doi: 10.1177/0956797615569578URLpmid: 4426139 |
36 | Lee, A.Y., &Aaker, J.L . ( 2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86( 2), 205-218. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205URLpmid: 14769079 |
37 | Levin, I. P, &Gaeth, G.J . ( 1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15( 3), 374-378. |
38 | Levin I. P., Schneider S. L., & Gaeth G. J . ( 1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76( 2), 149-188. |
39 | Li S., Su Y., & Sun Y . ( 2010). The effect of pseudo- immediacy on intertemporal choices. Journal of Risk Research, 13( 6), 781-787. doi: 10.1080/13669870903551704URL |
40 | Mittelman M., Andrade E. B., Chattopadhyay A., & Brendl C. M . ( 2014). The offer framing effect: Choosing single versus bundled offerings affects variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 41( 4), 953-964. doi: 10.1086/678193URL |
41 | Monga, A., &Bagchi, R . ( 2012). Years, months, and days versus 1, 12, and 365: The influence of units versus numbers. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 1), 185-198. doi: 10.1086/662039URL |
42 | Newman C. L., Howlett E., Burton S., Kozup J. C., & Tangari A. H . ( 2012). The influence of consumer concern about global climate change on framing effects for environmental sustainability messages. International Journal of Advertising, 31( 3), 511-527. doi: 10.2501/IJA-31-3-511-527URL |
43 | Orazi, D.C., Lei, J, &Bove, L.L . ( 2015). The nature and framing of gambling consequences in advertising. Journal of Business Research, 68( 10), 2049-2056. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.002URL |
44 | Pandelaere M., Briers B., & Lembregts C . ( 2011). How to make a 29% increase look bigger: The unit effect in option comparisons. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 2), 308-322. |
45 | Pavey, L., &Churchill, S . ( 2014). Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks: Priming autonomy moderates message framing effects. Plos One, 9( 7), e103892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103892URLpmid: 4117640 |
46 | Peters, E., &Levin, I.P . ( 2008). Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3( 6), 435-448. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.01.001URL |
47 | Reyna, V.F., &Brainerd, C.J . ( 2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18( 1), 89-107. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011URL |
48 | Rothman, A.J., &Salovey, P . ( 1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121( 1), 3-19. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3URLpmid: 9000890 |
49 | Schröder M., LÜer A., & Sadrieh A . ( 2015). Pay-what- you-want or mark-off-your-own-price - a framing effect in customer-selected pricing. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 200-204. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2014.10.007URL |
50 | Siegrist, M. ( 1997). Communicating low risk magnitudes: Incidence rates expressed as frequency versus rates expressed as probability. Risk Analysis, 17( 4), 507-510. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00891.xURL |
51 | Spence A., Leygue C., Bedwell B., & O'Malley C . ( 2014). Engaging with energy reduction: Does a climate change frame have the potential for achieving broader sustainable behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38( 3), 17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.006URL |
52 | Spence, A., &Pidgeon, N . ( 2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20( 4), 656-667. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002URL |
53 | Steinhorst J., Klöckner C. A., & Matthies E . ( 2015). Saving electricity - for the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43( 9), 125-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012URL |
54 | Stone E. R., Sieck W. R., Bull B. E., Yates J. F., Parks S. C., & Rush C. R . ( 2003). Foreground: Background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90( 1), 19-36. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7URL |
55 | Stone E. R., Yates J. F., & Parker A. M . ( 1994). Risk communication: Absolute versus relative expressions of low-probability risks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60( 3), 387-408. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1994.1091URL |
56 | Stone E. R., Yates J. F., & Parker A. M . ( 1997). Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3( 4), 243-256. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.3.4.243URL |
57 | Sun Y., Li S., & Bonini N . ( 2010). Attribute salience in graphical representations affects evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5( 3), 151-158. |
58 | Sun Y., Li S., Bonini N., & Su Y . ( 2012). Graph-Framing effects in decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 491-501. doi: 10.1002/bdm.749URL |
59 | Sun, Y., &Mellers, B . ( 2016). Trade-upgrade framing effects: Trades are losses, but upgrades are improvements. Judgment and Decision Making, 11( 6), 582-588. |
60 | Sun Y., Sarma E. A., Moyer A., & Messina C. R . ( 2015). Promoting mammography screening among Chinese American women using a message-framing intervention. Patient Education and Counseling, 98( 7), 878-883. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.021URLpmid: 25858632 |
61 | Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D . ( 1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211( 4481), 453-458. |
62 | Updegraff, J.A., &Rothman, A.J . ( 2013). Health message framing: Moderators, mediators, and mysteries. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7( 9), 668-679. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12056URL |
63 | Uskul A. K., Sherman D. K., & Fitzgibbon J . ( 2009). The cultural congruency effect: Culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed health messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45( 3), 535-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.005URL |
64 | Wettstein, M. ( 2012). Frame adoption in referendum campaigns the effect of news coverage on the public salience of issue interpretations. American Behavioral Scientist, 56( 3), 318-333. |
65 | Wiest S. L., Raymond L., & Clawson R. A . ( 2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 31, 187-198. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.006URL |
66 | Xu X., Arpan L. M., & Chen C. F . ( 2015). The moderating role of individual differences in responses to benefit and temporal framing of messages promoting residential energy saving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.004URL |
67 | Zhao C. X., Jiang C. M., Zhou L., Li S., Rao L. L., & Zheng R . ( 2015). The hidden opportunity cost of time effect on intertemporal choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00311URLpmid: 4376061 |
相关文章 11
[1] | 王惠芳;蒋京川. 老年人的框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(4): 612-621. |
[2] | 邓颖;徐富明;李欧;史燕伟;刘程浩. 社会偏好中的框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(4): 622-632. |
[3] | 李彬;徐富明;王伟;张慧;罗寒冰. 决策的加工过程及个体差异:模糊痕迹理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(2): 316-324. |
[4] | 刘扬;孙彦. 行为决策中框架效应研究新思路 —— 从风险决策到跨期决策, 从言语框架到图形框架[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(8): 1205-1217. |
[5] | 史燕伟;徐富明;李燕;刘程浩;李彬. 公共决策中的框架效应:理论解释及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(8): 1303-1311. |
[6] | 李爱梅;赵丹;熊冠星;谭飞;王笑天;凌文辁. 等待是一种折磨?等待时间知觉及其导致的非理性决策行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(11): 1679-1690. |
[7] | 于会会;徐富明;黄宝珍;文桂婵;王岚. 框架效应中的个体差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(6): 894-901. |
[8] | 孙彦;黄莉;刘扬. 决策中的图形框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(11): 1718-1726. |
[9] | 王璐璐;李永娟. 心理疲劳与任务框架对风险决策的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(10): 1546-1550. |
[10] | 文桂婵;徐富明;于会会;黄宝珍;王岚. 特征框架效应的心理机制与影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(12): 1822-1833. |
[11] | 高利苹;李纾;时勘. 从对框架效应的分析看风险决策的神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(6): 859-865. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4526