删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

框架效应的应用研究及其应用技巧

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

李晓明1,2(), 谭谱1
1. 湖南师范大学认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室
2. 湖南师范大学心理系, 长沙 410081
收稿日期:2018-01-19出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30
通讯作者:李晓明E-mail:2007@sohu.com

基金资助:*湖南省哲学社会科学基金资助(13YBA220)

Applied research on framing effect and related techniques

LI Xiao-Ming1,2(), TAN Pu1
1. Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province
2. Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Received:2018-01-19Online:2018-12-15Published:2018-10-30
Contact:LI Xiao-Ming E-mail:2007@sohu.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 个体的决策及偏好常会因信息的表达方式而变, 研究者将这种违背期望效用理论不变性的现象称之为“框架效应”。框架效应体现了人类非理性决策的普遍性, 也为合理利用人类的决策特点以干预其决策行为提供了重要契机。本文总结了框架效应在健康行为、市场营销及环保领域中的应用研究, 着重分析了数量信息的表达技巧, 如风险信息的呈现、数量单位的选择以及图形的物理属性设计, 旨在探讨如何在实践过程中通过变化信息呈现方式以实现对人类决策行为的重要影响。



图1突显存储容量维度的版本
图1突显存储容量维度的版本



图2突显返修率维度的版本
图2突显返修率维度的版本







1 李晓明, 和平, 刘林英 . ( 2016). 风险回避行为中的“红色图形效应”. 心理科学进展, 24, 351-355.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00351URL
2 李晓明, 刘心阁 . ( 2013). 图形表征的物理突显性对风险回避行为的影响. 心理科学, 36( 6), 1383-1387.
3 刘扬, 孙彦 . ( 2014). 行为决策中框架效应研究新思路——从风险决策到跨期决策, 从言语框架到图形框架. 心理科学进展, 22( 8), 1205-1217.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01205URL
4 史燕伟, 徐富明, 李燕, 刘程浩, 李彬 . ( 2014). 公共决策中的框架效应: 理论解释及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 22( 8), 1303-1311.
5 孙彦, 黄莉, 刘扬 . ( 2012). 决策中的图形框架效应. 心理科学进展, 20( 11), 1718-1726.
6 文桂婵, 徐富明, 于会会, 黄宝珍, 王岚 . ( 2011). 特征框架效应的心理机制与影响因素. 心理科学进展, 19( 12), 1822-1833.
7 Bagchi, R., &Davis, D.F . ( 2012). $29 for 70 items or 70 items for $29? How presentation order affects package perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 1), 62-73.
doi: 10.1086/661893URL
8 Bertolotti M., Chirchiglia G., & Catellani P . ( 2016). Promoting change in meat consumption among the elderly: Factual and prefactual framing of health and well-being. Appetite, 106( 1), 37-47.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.150URLpmid: 26924560
9 Burson K. A., Larrick R. P., & Lynch J. G . ( 2009). Six of one, half dozen of the other. Psychological Science, 20( 9), 1074-1078.
doi: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.182URLpmid: 23070413
10 Cesario J., Corker K. S., & Jelinek S . ( 2013). A self-regulatory framework for message framing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 2), 238-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.014URL
11 Cesario J., Grant H., & Higgins E. T . ( 2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86( 3), 388-404.
12 Chan, E., &Mukhopadhyay, A . ( 2010). When choosing makes a good thing better: Temporal variations in the valuation of hedonic consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 47( 3), 497-507.
doi: 10.1509/jmkr.47.3.497URL
13 Churchill S., Good A., & Pavey L . ( 2014). Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks. The role of temporal message framing and eating self-efficacy. Appetite, 80( 9), 131-136.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.008URLpmid: 24842596
14 Corbin J., McElroy T., & Black C . ( 2010). Memory reflected in our decisions: Higher working memory capacity predicts greater bias in risky choice. Judgment and Decision Making, 5( 2), 110-115.
doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9505-xURL
15 De Heus P., Hoogervorst N., & van Dijk E . ( 2010). Framing prisoners and chickens: Valence effects in the prisoner’s dilemma and the chicken game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 5), 736-742.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.013URL
16 Freling T. H., Vincent L. H., & Henard D. H . ( 2014). When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124( 2), 95-109.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.12.007URL
17 Gallagher, K.M., &Updegraff, J.A . ( 2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43( 1), 101-116.
18 Gallagher K. M., Updegraff J. A., Rothman A. J., & Sims L . ( 2011). Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain-and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography. Health Psychology, 30( 2), 145-152.
doi: 10.1037/a0022264URLpmid: 21401248
19 Gamliel, E., &Kreiner, H . ( 2013). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The interaction of visual display and attribute representation in attenuating framing bias. Judgment and Decision Making, 8( 4), 482-491.
20 Ganegoda, D.B., &Folger, R . ( 2015). Framing effects in justice perceptions: Prospect theory and counterfactuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 27-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.002URL
21 Garcia-Retamero, R., &Cokely, E.T . ( 2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17( 3), 270-287.
doi: 10.1037/a0023677URLpmid: 21942316
22 Garcia-Retamero, R., &Cokely, E.T . ( 2014). The influence of skills, message frame, and visual aids on prevention of sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27( 2), 179-189.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.1797URL
23 Garcia-Retamero, R., &Galesic, M . ( 2010). How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25( 12), 1323-1329.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1484-9URLpmid: 2988162
24 Haerem T., Kuvaas B., Bakken B. T., & Karlsen T . ( 2011). Do military decision makers behave as predicted by prospect theory? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24( 5), 482-497.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.704URL
25 Higgins, E.T. ( 1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52( 12), 1280-1300.
26 Hong F., Hossain T., & List J. A . ( 2015). Framing manipulations in contests: a natural field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 118, 372-382.
doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.02.014URL
27 Huang, Y., &Wang, L . ( 2010). Sex differences in framing effects across task domain. Personality and Individual Differences, 48( 5), 649-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.005URL
28 Hurlstone M. J., Lewandowsky S., Newell B. R., & Sewell B . ( 2014). The effect of framing and normative messages in building support for climate policies. Plos One, 9( 12), e114335-e114335.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114335URLpmid: 4266503
29 Isaac, M.S., &Poor, M . ( 2016). The sleeper framing effect: The influence of frame valence on immediate and retrospective judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26( 1), 53-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.002URL
30 Jasper J. D., Fournier C., & Christman S. D . ( 2014). Handedness differences in information framing. Brain and Cognition, 84( 1), 85-89.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.11.006URLpmid: 24326298
31 Jin, H.J., &Han, D.H . ( 2014). Interaction between message framing and consumers’ prior subjective knowledge regarding food safety issues. Food Policy, 44, 95-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.10.007URL
32 Kanner, M.D. ( 2004). Framing and the role of the second actor: An application of prospect theory to bargaining. Political Psychology, 25( 2), 213-239.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00369.xURL
33 Khan, U., &Dhar, R . ( 2010). Price-framing effects on the purchase of hedonic and utilitarian bundles. Journal of Marketing Research, 47( 6), 1090-1099.
34 Kliger, D., &Gilad, D . ( 2012). Red light, green light: Color priming in financial decisions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41( 5), 738-745.
doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2012.07.003URL
35 Knoll L. J., Magis-Weinberg L., Speekenbrink M., & Blakemore S. J . ( 2015). Social influence on risk perception during adolescence. Psychological Science, 26( 5), 583-592.
doi: 10.1177/0956797615569578URLpmid: 4426139
36 Lee, A.Y., &Aaker, J.L . ( 2004). Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86( 2), 205-218.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205URLpmid: 14769079
37 Levin, I. P, &Gaeth, G.J . ( 1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15( 3), 374-378.
38 Levin I. P., Schneider S. L., & Gaeth G. J . ( 1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76( 2), 149-188.
39 Li S., Su Y., & Sun Y . ( 2010). The effect of pseudo- immediacy on intertemporal choices. Journal of Risk Research, 13( 6), 781-787.
doi: 10.1080/13669870903551704URL
40 Mittelman M., Andrade E. B., Chattopadhyay A., & Brendl C. M . ( 2014). The offer framing effect: Choosing single versus bundled offerings affects variety seeking. Journal of Consumer Research, 41( 4), 953-964.
doi: 10.1086/678193URL
41 Monga, A., &Bagchi, R . ( 2012). Years, months, and days versus 1, 12, and 365: The influence of units versus numbers. Journal of Consumer Research, 39( 1), 185-198.
doi: 10.1086/662039URL
42 Newman C. L., Howlett E., Burton S., Kozup J. C., & Tangari A. H . ( 2012). The influence of consumer concern about global climate change on framing effects for environmental sustainability messages. International Journal of Advertising, 31( 3), 511-527.
doi: 10.2501/IJA-31-3-511-527URL
43 Orazi, D.C., Lei, J, &Bove, L.L . ( 2015). The nature and framing of gambling consequences in advertising. Journal of Business Research, 68( 10), 2049-2056.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.002URL
44 Pandelaere M., Briers B., & Lembregts C . ( 2011). How to make a 29% increase look bigger: The unit effect in option comparisons. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 2), 308-322.
45 Pavey, L., &Churchill, S . ( 2014). Promoting the avoidance of high-calorie snacks: Priming autonomy moderates message framing effects. Plos One, 9( 7), e103892.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103892URLpmid: 4117640
46 Peters, E., &Levin, I.P . ( 2008). Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgment and Decision Making, 3( 6), 435-448.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2008.01.001URL
47 Reyna, V.F., &Brainerd, C.J . ( 2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18( 1), 89-107.
doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011URL
48 Rothman, A.J., &Salovey, P . ( 1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121( 1), 3-19.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3URLpmid: 9000890
49 Schröder M., LÜer A., & Sadrieh A . ( 2015). Pay-what- you-want or mark-off-your-own-price - a framing effect in customer-selected pricing. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 57, 200-204.
doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2014.10.007URL
50 Siegrist, M. ( 1997). Communicating low risk magnitudes: Incidence rates expressed as frequency versus rates expressed as probability. Risk Analysis, 17( 4), 507-510.
doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00891.xURL
51 Spence A., Leygue C., Bedwell B., & O'Malley C . ( 2014). Engaging with energy reduction: Does a climate change frame have the potential for achieving broader sustainable behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38( 3), 17-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.006URL
52 Spence, A., &Pidgeon, N . ( 2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20( 4), 656-667.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002URL
53 Steinhorst J., Klöckner C. A., & Matthies E . ( 2015). Saving electricity - for the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43( 9), 125-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012URL
54 Stone E. R., Sieck W. R., Bull B. E., Yates J. F., Parks S. C., & Rush C. R . ( 2003). Foreground: Background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90( 1), 19-36.
doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00003-7URL
55 Stone E. R., Yates J. F., & Parker A. M . ( 1994). Risk communication: Absolute versus relative expressions of low-probability risks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60( 3), 387-408.
doi: 10.1006/obhd.1994.1091URL
56 Stone E. R., Yates J. F., & Parker A. M . ( 1997). Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3( 4), 243-256.
doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.3.4.243URL
57 Sun Y., Li S., & Bonini N . ( 2010). Attribute salience in graphical representations affects evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5( 3), 151-158.
58 Sun Y., Li S., Bonini N., & Su Y . ( 2012). Graph-Framing effects in decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 491-501.
doi: 10.1002/bdm.749URL
59 Sun, Y., &Mellers, B . ( 2016). Trade-upgrade framing effects: Trades are losses, but upgrades are improvements. Judgment and Decision Making, 11( 6), 582-588.
60 Sun Y., Sarma E. A., Moyer A., & Messina C. R . ( 2015). Promoting mammography screening among Chinese American women using a message-framing intervention. Patient Education and Counseling, 98( 7), 878-883.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.021URLpmid: 25858632
61 Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D . ( 1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211( 4481), 453-458.
62 Updegraff, J.A., &Rothman, A.J . ( 2013). Health message framing: Moderators, mediators, and mysteries. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7( 9), 668-679.
doi: 10.1111/spc3.12056URL
63 Uskul A. K., Sherman D. K., & Fitzgibbon J . ( 2009). The cultural congruency effect: Culture, regulatory focus, and the effectiveness of gain- vs. loss-framed health messages. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45( 3), 535-541.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.005URL
64 Wettstein, M. ( 2012). Frame adoption in referendum campaigns the effect of news coverage on the public salience of issue interpretations. American Behavioral Scientist, 56( 3), 318-333.
65 Wiest S. L., Raymond L., & Clawson R. A . ( 2015). Framing, partisan predispositions, and public opinion on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 31, 187-198.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.006URL
66 Xu X., Arpan L. M., & Chen C. F . ( 2015). The moderating role of individual differences in responses to benefit and temporal framing of messages promoting residential energy saving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 95-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.004URL
67 Zhao C. X., Jiang C. M., Zhou L., Li S., Rao L. L., & Zheng R . ( 2015). The hidden opportunity cost of time effect on intertemporal choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 311.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00311URLpmid: 4376061




[1]王惠芳;蒋京川. 老年人的框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(4): 612-621.
[2]邓颖;徐富明;李欧;史燕伟;刘程浩. 社会偏好中的框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(4): 622-632.
[3]李彬;徐富明;王伟;张慧;罗寒冰. 决策的加工过程及个体差异:模糊痕迹理论视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(2): 316-324.
[4]刘扬;孙彦. 行为决策中框架效应研究新思路 —— 从风险决策到跨期决策, 从言语框架到图形框架[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(8): 1205-1217.
[5]史燕伟;徐富明;李燕;刘程浩;李彬. 公共决策中的框架效应:理论解释及影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(8): 1303-1311.
[6]李爱梅;赵丹;熊冠星;谭飞;王笑天;凌文辁. 等待是一种折磨?等待时间知觉及其导致的非理性决策行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(11): 1679-1690.
[7]于会会;徐富明;黄宝珍;文桂婵;王岚. 框架效应中的个体差异[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(6): 894-901.
[8]孙彦;黄莉;刘扬. 决策中的图形框架效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(11): 1718-1726.
[9]王璐璐;李永娟. 心理疲劳与任务框架对风险决策的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(10): 1546-1550.
[10]文桂婵;徐富明;于会会;黄宝珍;王岚. 特征框架效应的心理机制与影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(12): 1822-1833.
[11]高利苹;李纾;时勘. 从对框架效应的分析看风险决策的神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(6): 859-865.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4526
相关话题/心理 科学 人类 信息 物理

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 从“理性人”到“行为人”:公共政策研究的行为科学转向
    吕小康1,武迪1,隋晓阳1,汪新建1,程婕婷2()1.南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系,天津3003502.山东大学(威海)法学院社会工作系,威海264209收稿日期:2017-11-13出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30通讯作者:程婕婷E-mail:chengjie ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 情境信息对模糊表情识别的影响及其作用机制
    徐进1,李红1,2,3,雷怡1,2,3()1深圳大学心理与社会学院2深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室3深圳市神经科学研究院,深圳518000收稿日期:2017-10-18出版日期:2018-11-15发布日期:2018-09-26通讯作者:雷怡E-mail:leiyi821@vip.sina.co ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 个人主义上升, 集体主义式微?——全球文化变迁与民众心理变化
    黄梓航1,2,3,敬一鸣1,2,3,喻丰4,古若雷1,2,3,周欣悦5,张建新3,6,蔡华俭1,2,3()1中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京1001013中国科学院大学,北京1000494西安交通大学人文社会科学学院,西安71 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 积极心理干预是“新瓶装旧酒”吗?
    段文杰1(),卜禾21武汉大学社会学系,武汉4300002香港城市大学应用社会科学系,香港收稿日期:2017-12-25出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27通讯作者:段文杰E-mail:duan.w@whu.edu.cn基金资助:*武汉大学人文社会科学青年****学术发展计划 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 为他人做决策:多维度心理机制与决策体验
    陆静怡*(),尚雪松华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062收稿日期:2017-12-24出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:陆静怡E-mail:jylu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71771088);上海市教育发展基金会和上 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 喜欢悲伤音乐的心理机制 *
    王丁,王超,李红()深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-05-23出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基本心理需要及其满足 *
    吴才智(),荣硕,朱芳婷,谌燕,郭永玉青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,华中师范大学心理学院,人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室,武汉430079收稿日期:2017-10-17出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:吴才智E-mail:dsxq888@126.com ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01