删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

具身效应何处寻:解决可重复性危机的分析性途径

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

刘传军, 廖江群()
清华大学心理学系, 北京 100084
收稿日期:2018-01-29出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30
通讯作者:廖江群E-mail:liaojq@tsinghua.edu.cn

基金资助:*国家社会科学基金项目(2018BSH114);清华大学自主科研计划(2017THZWYY11)

An analytical approach to understanding and solving the replication crisis of the embodiment effect

LIU Chuanjun, LIAO Jiangqun()
Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Received:2018-01-29Online:2018-12-15Published:2018-10-30
Contact:LIAO Jiangqun E-mail:liaojq@tsinghua.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 最近的研究发现某些具身效应不能被重复, 这给心理学界带来了空前的可重复性危机。基于对具身认知“概念化”、“替代”和“构成”主题的分析, 通过区分具身效应的生成层次、强弱条件、建构方向和任务特性四个方面, 以便在实验中更准确地“定位”具身效应。未来研究可以从具身效应层次的分离与综合, 强弱条件的界分, 调节或中介机制探讨以及实验范式革新等方面加以推进。



图1具身效应的生成层次
图1具身效应的生成层次







1 陈巍 . ( 2014). 可重复性: 盘旋在具身认知实验室上方的“幽灵”. 心理技术与应用, ( 1), 23-25.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5588.2014.01.006URL
2 陈巍, 郭本禹 . ( 2014). 具身-生成的认知科学: 走出“战国时代”. 心理学探新, 34( 2), 111-116.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5184.2014.02.003URL
3 陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音 . ( 2014). 具身道德: 道德心理学研究的新取向. 心理发展与教育, 30( 6), 664-672.
4 方溦, 葛列众, 甘甜 . ( 2016). 道德具身认知的理论研究. 心理与行为研究, 14( 6), 765-772.
5 韩冬, 叶浩生 . ( 2014). 重中之“重”——具身视角下重的体验与表征. 心理科学进展, 22( 6), 918-925.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00918URL
6 何华容, 丁道群 . ( 2014). 良心的重量: 基于具身视角的内疚情绪与重量感关系的实验研究. 第十七届全国心理学学术会议, 中国北京.
7 黄茜羽, 李宏翰 . ( 2013). 冷暖体验对道德判断的影响. 心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议, 中国南京.
8 胡传鹏, 王非, 过继成思, 宋梦迪, 隋洁, 彭凯平 . ( 2016). 心理学研究中的可重复性问题: 从危机到契机. 心理科学进展, 24( 9), 1504-1518.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01504URL
9 黎晓丹, 杜建政, 叶浩生 . ( 2016). 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应: 蜷缩的身体使人更卑微. 心理学报, 48( 6), 746-756.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00746URL
10 刘亚, 王振宏, 孔风 . ( 2011). 情绪具身观: 情绪研究的新视角. 心理科学进展, 19( 1), 50-59.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00050URL
11 刘钊, 丁凤琴 . ( 2016). 大学生道德概念的重量与洁净隐喻. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24( 4), 533-536.
doi: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2016.04.014URL
12 栾子烟 . ( 2013). 道德温度:身体冷暖与青少年道德决策(硕士学位论文). 上海:华东师范大学.
13 牛怡然, 鲁忠义 . ( 2013). 道德概念的亮度隐喻表征及其对亮度知觉判断的影响 . 心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议, 中国南京.
14 彭凯平, 喻丰 . ( 2012). 道德的心理物理学现象、机制与意义. 中国社会科学, ( 12), 28-45.
15 苏彦捷, 孙芳芳 . ( 2014). 道德具身性的元分析研究. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 32( 2), 88-96.
16 伍秋萍, 冯聪, 陈斌斌 . ( 2011). 具身框架下的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 19( 3), 336-345.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00336URL
17 薛灿灿, 叶浩生 . ( 2011). 具身社会认知: 认知心理学的生态学转向. 心理科学, 34( 5), 1230-1235.
18 阎书昌 . ( 2011). 身体洁净与道德. 心理科学进展, 19( 8), 1242-1248.
19 杨继平, 郭秀梅 . ( 2016). 具身视角下道德概念的隐喻研究. 心理学探新, 36( 5), 387-391.
20 杨继平, 郭秀梅, 王兴超 . ( 2017). 道德概念的隐喻表征——从红白颜色、左右位置和正斜字体的维度. 心理学报, 49( 7), 875-885.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00875URL
21 叶浩生 . ( 2010). 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18( 5), 705-710.
22 叶浩生 . ( 2013). 认知与身体: 理论心理学的视角. 心理学报, 45( 4), 481-488.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00481URL
23 殷融, 曲方炳, 叶浩生 . ( 2012). 具身概念表征的研究及理论述评. 心理科学进展, 20( 9), 1372-1381.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01372URL
24 殷融, 苏得权, 叶浩生 . ( 2013). 具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论. 心理科学进展, 21( 2), 220-234.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00220URL
25 翟贤亮, 葛鲁嘉 . ( 2017). 从离身到具身: 具身管理学的可能. 心理科学, 40( 1), 238-243.
26 Ackerman J. M., Nocera C. C., & Bargh J. A . ( 2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328( 5986), 1712-1715.
doi: 10.1126/science.1189993URLpmid: 20576894
27 Andy, C(2008 ). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00217-1URL
28 Bai Y., Maruskin L. A., Chen S., Gordon A. M., Stellar J. E., McNeil G. D., .. Keltner D . ( 2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113( 2), 185-209.
doi: 10.1037/pspa0000087URLpmid: 28481617
29 Banerjee P., Chatterjee P., & Sinha J . ( 2012). Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23( 4), 407-409.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611432497URLpmid: 22395128
30 Bargh J. A., Chen M., & Burrows L . ( 1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71( 2), 230-244.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.230URLpmid: 8765481
31 Carney D. R., Cuddy A. J., & Yap A. J . ( 2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21( 10), 1363-1368.
32 Chapman H. A., Kim D. A., Susskind J. M., & Anderson A. K . ( 2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323( 5918), 1222-1226.
doi: 10.1126/science.1165565URLpmid: 19251631
33 Chartrand T. L., Huber J., Shiv B., & Tanner R. J . ( 2008). Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35( 2), 189-201.
doi: 10.1086/588685URL
34 Day, M.V., &Bobocel, D.R . ( 2013). The weight of a guilty conscience: Subjective body weight as an embodiment of guilt. PLoS One, 8( 7), e69546.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069546URLpmid: 3729967
35 Dijksterhuis, Ap, &Nordgren, Loran F . ( 2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 1( 2), 95-109.
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.xURLpmid: 26151465
36 Doyen S., Klein O., Pichon C. L., & Cleeremans A . ( 2012). Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind? Plos One, 7( 1), e29081.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029081URLpmid: 22279526
37 Eisenberger N. I., Lieberman M. D., & Williams K. D . ( 2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302( 5643), 290-292.
doi: 10.1126/science.1089134URLpmid: 14551436
38 Eskine K. J., Kacinik N. A., & Prinz J. J . ( 2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22( 3), 295-299.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611398497URLpmid: 21307274
39 Eskine K. J., Kacinik N. A., & Webster G. D . ( 2012). The bitter truth about morality: Virtue, not vice, makes a bland beverage taste nice. PLoS One, 7( 7), e41159.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041159URLpmid: 3399822
40 Ferrin, A. ( 2017). Good moral judgment and decision-making without deliberation. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 55( 1), 68-95.
doi: 10.1111/sjp.12210URL
41 Fischer J., Fischer P., Englich B., Aydin N., & Frey D . ( 2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47( 6), 1146-1154.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.008URL
42 Garrison K. E., Tang D., & Schmeichel B. J . ( 2016). Embodying power: A preregistered replication and extension of the power pose effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7( 7), 623-630.
43 Gilead M., Gal O., Polak M., & Cholow Y . ( 2015). The role of nature and nurture in conceptual metaphors the case of gustatory priming. Social Psychology, 46( 3), 167-173.
doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000238URL
44 Giner-Sorolla, R., &Chapman, H.A . ( 2017). Beyond Purity. Psychological Science, 28( 1), 80-91.
45 Goldinger S. D., Papesh M. H., Barnhart A. S., Hansen W. A., & Hout M. C . ( 2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23( 4), 959-978.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1URLpmid: 27282990
46 Greene, J.D. ( 2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 11( 8), 322-323.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004URLpmid: 17625951
47 Greene J. D., Morelli S. A., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L. E., & Cohen J. D . ( 2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107( 3), 1144-1154.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004URLpmid: 2429958
48 Gronau Q. F., Van Erp S., Heck D. W., Cesario J., Jonas K. J., & Wagenmakers E.-J . ( 2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2( 1), 123-138.
doi: 10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760URL
49 Helzer, E.G., &Pizarro, D.A . ( 2011). Dirty liberals! reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22( 4), 517-522.
doi: 10.1177/0956797611402514URLpmid: 21421934
50 Homan P., Ely B. A., Yuan M., Brosch T., Ng J., Trope Y., & Schiller D . ( 2017). Aversive smell associations shape social judgment. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 144, 86-95.
doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.07.004URL
51 Horberg E. J., Oveis C., Keltner D., & Cohen A. B . ( 2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97( 6), 963-976.
doi: 10.1037/a0017423URLpmid: 19968413
52 IJzerman, H., &Koole, S.L . ( 2011). From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches-bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: Comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137( 2), 355-361.
doi: 10.1037/a0022373URLpmid: 21355634
53 Inbar Y., Pizarro D. A., & Bloom P . ( 2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion, 23( 4), 714-725.
doi: 10.1080/02699930802110007URL
54 Inbar Y., Pizarro D. A., Knobe J., & Bloom P . ( 2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9( 3), 435-439.
doi: 10.1037/a0015960URLpmid: 19485621
55 Johnson D. J., Cheung F., & Donnellan M. B . ( 2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45( 3), 209-215.
doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000186URL
56 Kang, E., &Lakshmanan, A . ( 2017). Role of executive attention in consumer learning with background music. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27( 1), 35-48.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.03.003URL
57 Kang Y., Williams L. E., Clark M. S., Gray J. R., & Bargh J. A . ( 2011). Physical temperature effects on trust behavior: The role of insula. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6( 4), 507-515.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq077URLpmid: 3150863
58 Landau M. J., Meier B. P., & Keefer L. A . ( 2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136( 6), 1045-1067.
doi: 10.1037/a0020970URLpmid: 20822208
59 Landy, J.F., &Goodwin, G.P . ( 2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? a meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science A Journal of The Association for Psychological Science, 10( 4), 518-536.
doi: 10.1177/1745691615583128URLpmid: 26177951
60 Lee, S. W.S., &Schwarz, N . ( 2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleansing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20( 5), 307-311.
61 Lee, S. W.S., &Schwarz, N . ( 2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103( 5), 737-749.
doi: 10.1037/a0029708URLpmid: 22905770
62 Liljenquist K., Zhong C. B., & Galinsky A. D . ( 2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21( 3), 381-383.
doi: 10.1177/0956797610361426URLpmid: 2042407420
63 Meier B. P., Moeller S. K., Riemer-Peltz M., & Robinson M. D . ( 2012). Sweet taste preferences and experiences predict prosocial inferences, personalities, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102( 1), 163-174.
doi: 10.1037/a0025253URLpmid: 21875232
64 Meier B. P., Simone S., Norbert S., & Bargh J. A . ( 2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4( 4), 705-716.
65 Montoro P. R., Contreras M. J., Elosúa M. R., & Marmolejoramos F . ( 2015). Cross-modal metaphorical mapping of spoken emotion words onto vertical space. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1205.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01205URLpmid: 4531208
66 Moore, C., &Barresi, J . ( 2017). The role of second-person information in the development of social understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1667.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01667URLpmid: 5622194
67 Mukherjee S., Kramer T., & Kulow K . ( 2017). The effect of spicy gustatory sensations on variety-seeking. Psychology & Marketing, 34( 8), 786-794.
doi: 10.1002/mar.21022URL
68 Natanzon, M., &Ferguson, M.J . ( 2012). Goal pursuit is grounded: The link between forward movement and achievement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 1), 379-382.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.06.021URL
69 Niedenthal, P.M. ( 2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316( 5827), 1002-1005.
70 Nosek B. A., Hawkins C. B., & Frazier R. S . ( 2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15( 4), 152-159.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005URLpmid: 3073696
71 Oosterwijk S., Rotteveel M., Fischer A. H., & Hess U . ( 2009). Embodied emotion concepts: How generating words about pride and disappointment influences posture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39( 3), 457-466.
doi: 10.1002/ejsp.584URL
72 Preston, J.L., &Ritter, R.S . ( 2012). Cleanliness and godliness: Mutual association between two kinds of personal purity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 6), 1365-1368.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.015URL
73 Price, T.F., &Harmon-Jones, E . ( 2015). Embodied emotion: The influence of manipulated facial and bodily states on emotive responses. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science, 6( 6), 461-473.
doi: 10.1002/wcs.1370URLpmid: 26401657
74 Ranehill E., Dreber A., Johannesson M., Leiberg S., Sul S., & Weber R. A . ( 2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26( 5), 653-656.
doi: 10.1177/0956797614553946URLpmid: 25810452
75 Ritter, R.S., &Preston, J.L . ( 2011). Gross gods and icky atheism: Disgust responses to rejected religious beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47( 6), 1225-1230.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.006URL
76 Rotella, K.N., &Richeson, J.A . ( 2013). Body of guilt: Using embodied cognition to mitigate backlash to reminders of personal & ingroup wrongdoing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 4), 643-650.
77 Rozin P., Haidt J., & Fincher K . ( 2009). Psychology. From oral to moral. Science, 323( 5918), 1179-1180.
doi: 10.1126/science.1170492URLpmid: 19251619
78 Rozin P., Lowery L., Imada S., & Haidt J . ( 1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76( 4), 574-586.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574URLpmid: 10234846
79 Schaefer M., Denke C., Heinze H. J., & Rotte M . ( 2014). Rough primes and rough conversations: Evidence for a modality-specific basis to mental metaphors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9( 11), 1653-1659.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nst163URLpmid: 4221208
80 Schaefer M., Rotte M., Heinze H. J., & Denke C . ( 2015). Dirty deeds and dirty bodies: Embodiment of the Macbeth effect is mapped topographically onto the somatosensory cortex. Scientific Reports, 5, 18051.
doi: 10.1038/srep18051URLpmid: 26686599
81 Schilbach L., Timmermans B., Reddy V., Costall A., Bente G., Schlicht T., & Vogeley K . ( 2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36( 4), 393-462.
82 Schnall, S. ( 2017). Disgust as embodied loss aversion. European Review of Social Psychology, 28( 1), 50-94.
doi: 10.1080/10463283.2016.1259844URL
83 Schnall S., Benton J., & Harvey S . ( 2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19( 12), 1219-1222.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02227.xURLpmid: 19121126
84 Schnall S., Haidt J., Clore G. L., & Jordan A. H . ( 2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34( 8), 1096-1109.
85 Seidel, A., &Prinz, J . ( 2013). Sound morality: Irritating and icky noises amplify judgments in divergent moral domains. Cognition, 127( 1), 1-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.004URLpmid: 23318349
86 ShapiroL. ( 2011). Embodied Cognition. London and New York: Rutledge.
87 Sheikh S., Botindari L., & White E . ( 2013). Embodied metaphors and emotions in the moralization of restrained eating practices. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 3), 509-513.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.016URL
88 Sherman, G.D., &Clore, G.L . ( 2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20( 8), 1019-1025.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02403.xURLpmid: 2832478
89 Skarlicki D. P., Hoegg J., Aquino K., & Nadisic T . ( 2013). Does injustice affect your sense of taste and smell? The mediating role of moral disgust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 5), 852-859.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.011URL
90 Song H. J., Vonasch A. J., Meier B. P., & Bargh J. A . ( 2012). Brighten up: Smiles facilitate perceptual judgment of facial lightness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 1), 450-452.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.003URL
91 Valdesolo P., Ouyang J., & DeSteno D . ( 2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 4), 693-695.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.004URL
92 Wei W. Q., Lu J. G., Galinsky A. D., Wu H., Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J., .. Wang L . ( 2017). Regional ambient temperature is associated with human personality. Nature Human Behaviour, 1( 12), 890-895.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0240-0URL
93 Williams, L.E., &Bargh, J.A . ( 2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322( 5901), 606-607.
doi: 10.1126/science.1162548URLpmid: 2737341
94 Wilson, M. ( 2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9( 4), 625-636.
doi: 10.3758/BF03196322URLpmid: 12613670
95 Wiswede D., MÜnte T. F., Krämer U. M., & RÜsseler J . ( 2009). Embodied emotion modulates neural signature of performance monitoring. Plos One, 4( 6), e5754.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005754URLpmid: 2685014
96 Xu A. J., Zwick R., & Schwarz N . ( 2012). Washing away your (good or bad) luck: Physical cleansing affects risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141( 1), 26-30.
doi: 10.1037/a0023997URLpmid: 21707206
97 Yan Z. X., Ding D. Q., & Yan L. S . ( 2011). To wash your body, or purify your soul: Physical cleansing would strengthen the sense of high moral character. Psychology, 2( 9), 992-997.
98 Yang Q., Wu X. C., Zhou X. Y., Mead N. L., Vohs K. D., & Baumeister R. F . ( 2013). Diverging effects of clean versus dirty money on attitudes, values, and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104( 3), 473-489.
doi: 10.1037/a0030596URLpmid: 23127377
99 Zapatafonseca L., Froese T., Schilbach L., Vogeley K., & Timmermans B . ( 2018). Sensitivity to social contingency in adults with high-functioning autism during computer- mediated embodied interaction. Behavioral Science, 8, 22.
doi: 10.3390/bs8020022URLpmid: 29419758
100 Zestcott C. A., Stone J., & Landau M. J . ( 2017). The role of conscious attention in how weight serves as an embodiment of importance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43( 12), 1712-1723.
doi: 10.1177/0146167217727505URL
101 Zhang, M., &Li, X.P . ( 2012). From physical weight to psychological significance: The contribution of semantic activations. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 6), 1063-1075.
doi: 10.1086/661768URL
102 Zhong, C.B., &Liljenquist, K . ( 2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313( 5792), 1451-1452.
103 Ziv N., Hoftman M., & Geyer M . ( 2012). Music and moral judgment: The effect of background music on the evaluation of ads promoting unethical behavior. Psychology of Music, 40( 6), 738-760.
doi: 10.1177/0305735611406579URL




[1]于文华, 鲁忠义. 手势认知功能研究的新视角:“空间化”手势假设[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 426-433.
[2]熊素红, 孙洪杰, 陆佶, 姚琦, 张全成. 具身认知视角的饮食消费行为——基于心理模拟“具身”方式[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 486-496.
[3]李莹, 张灿, 王悦. 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1224-1231.
[4]殷继兴, 胡传鹏. 神经科学偏见效应:可重复性及其心理机制的探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 1988-1995.
[5]陈琳, 田晓明, 段锦云. 建议采纳的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[6]魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎. 具身认知视角下的消费者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1294-1306.
[7]李恒. “前”、“后”轴上的内隐时空映射及其影响因素 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[8]路红, 张心园, 韦文琦, 刘毅. 空间物理秩序对心理和行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[9]胡传鹏;王非;过继成思;宋梦迪; 隋洁;彭凯平. 心理学研究中的可重复性问题:从危机到契机[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(9): 1504-1518.
[10]孙炳丽;田雨;孙海洋;王文忠. 从心理咨询与治疗的角度看自我[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[11]叶红燕;张凤华. 从具身视角看道德判断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[12]郑玮琦;刘烨;傅小兰. 影响时空隐喻理解中时间运动视角选择的因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1711-1722.
[13]李慧敏;王若萌;王权红;邱江. 计算机时代的书写心理学[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1843-1851.
[14]韩冬;叶浩生. 重中之“重”——具身视角下重的体验与表征[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(6): 918-925.
[15]陈昭蓉;李晔. 关系模式框架下的具身社会关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(4): 702-710.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4529
相关话题/心理 科学 心理学 学术 清华大学

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 个人主义上升, 集体主义式微?——全球文化变迁与民众心理变化
    黄梓航1,2,3,敬一鸣1,2,3,喻丰4,古若雷1,2,3,周欣悦5,张建新3,6,蔡华俭1,2,3()1中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京1001013中国科学院大学,北京1000494西安交通大学人文社会科学学院,西安71 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 积极心理干预是“新瓶装旧酒”吗?
    段文杰1(),卜禾21武汉大学社会学系,武汉4300002香港城市大学应用社会科学系,香港收稿日期:2017-12-25出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27通讯作者:段文杰E-mail:duan.w@whu.edu.cn基金资助:*武汉大学人文社会科学青年****学术发展计划 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 为他人做决策:多维度心理机制与决策体验
    陆静怡*(),尚雪松华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062收稿日期:2017-12-24出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:陆静怡E-mail:jylu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71771088);上海市教育发展基金会和上 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 喜欢悲伤音乐的心理机制 *
    王丁,王超,李红()深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-05-23出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基本心理需要及其满足 *
    吴才智(),荣硕,朱芳婷,谌燕,郭永玉青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,华中师范大学心理学院,人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室,武汉430079收稿日期:2017-10-17出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:吴才智E-mail:dsxq888@126.com ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 光照对社会心理和行为的影响 *
    陈庆伟1,2,汝涛涛2(),周菊燕1,李静华1,熊晓1,李笑然4,周国富2,3,4()1华南师范大学心理学院,光与身心健康研究中心,广州5106312华南师范大学,国家绿色光电子国际联合研究中心,广州5100063华南师范大学,华南先进光电子研究院,广东省光信息材料与技术重点实验室&彩色动态电子纸显 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 大数据时代心理学文本分析技术 ——“主题模型”的应用
    曹奔1;夏勉1;任志洪2,3;林秀彬1;徐升1;赖丽足1;王琪1;江光荣1(1华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079)(2福州大学应用心理学系,福州350108)(3DepartmentofCounselingPsycholo ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01