王羽涛1,
陈倩1,
朱利群1,,
1.南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院 南京 210095
2.南京农业大学公共管理博士后流动站 南京 210095
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(20YJCZH044)、中国博士后科学基金项目(2019M651872)和江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目[CX(18)3074]资助
详细信息
作者简介:胡乃娟, 研究方向为区域农业生态管理。E-mail: hunaijuan@163.com
通讯作者:朱利群, 主要研究方向为区域农业发展与农业生态。E-mail: zhulq@njau.edu.cn
中图分类号:F323.3计量
文章访问数:66
HTML全文浏览量:22
PDF下载量:29
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2021-05-09
录用日期:2021-06-10
网络出版日期:2021-07-15
刊出日期:2021-10-01
Influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to adopt rice-crayfish co-culture and their heterogeneity
HU Naijuan1, 2,,WANG Yutao1,
CHEN Qian1,
ZHU Liqun1,,
1. College of Humanities and Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2. Public Administration Postdoctoral Research Station, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Funds:This study was supported by the Youth Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (20YJCZH044), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M651872) and Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund [CX(18)3074]
More Information
Corresponding author:E-mail: zhulq@njau.edu.cn
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:近年来, 水稻-小龙虾共作(稻虾共作)作为一种生态农业模式受到大力推广, 农户作为直接生产决策者, 厘清其采纳意愿及影响机理, 对稻虾共作模式的科学推广和可持续发展具有重要意义。本研究基于江苏省5市603个农户的调查数据, 采用计划行为理论和有序Logistic模型, 探讨农户稻虾共作模式采纳意愿的影响因素和异质性。结果表明: 1)样本中有56.88%的农户愿意采纳稻虾共作模式, 且收益预期是关键影响因素; 2)行为态度、主观规范和知觉行为控制均显著影响农户稻虾共作模式的采纳意愿; 3)不同限定条件下, 农户稻虾共作模式采纳意愿的影响因素具有异质性, 具体来说, 基础设施完备和兼业化对高预期收益农户采纳意愿的影响更强, 给予补贴、受邻里效应影响越小的农户采纳意愿越强, 同时, 受邻里影响小的农户对技术培训及学习容易程度要求越高, 给予补贴和提高农技部门指导效果可以提高基础设施不完备地区农户的采纳意愿, 邻里效应和兼业化对技术学习难易有负向影响, 而收益预期、环境预期能激励农户采纳生态农业模式。据此, 提出政府部门应加强技术培训力度和指导效果、完善基础设施、加快经营主体培育、探索差异化激励政策等政策建议。
关键词:稻虾共作/
农户/
计划行为理论/
采纳意愿/
异质性
Abstract:In recent years, rice-crayfish co-culture has been vigorously promoted as an ecological agricultural mode. As a direct production decision-maker, farmers’ adoption intention and its influence mechanism should be clarified for the scientific promotion and sustainable development of rice-crayfish co-culture. Based on the questionnaire survey and on-the-spot interviews data of 603 farmers in five cities of Jiangsu Province, this study explored the influencing factors and their heterogeneity of farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode using the theory of planned behavior and ordered logistic model. Results show that: 1) 56.88% of the farmers in the sample were willing to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode, with income expectation as the key influencing factor. 2) Behavioral attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control had significant effects on farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode. The order of influence was as follows: perceptual behavior control > behavior attitude > subjective norm. 3) Under different qualifications, the factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode were heterogeneous. Specifically, complete infrastructure and part-time industrialization had a stronger influence on the willingness to adopt this mode of farmers with a high expected income. The farmers who were given subsidies and less affedcted by neighborhood had a stronger willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode. Farmers who were less influenced by the neighborhood had higher requirements for technical training and easeness of learning. The neighborhood effect, guidance of the agricultural technology department, difficulty of technical learning, and level of education had a significant positive effect on the willingness of farmers who participated in the technical training. Distributing subsidies and improving the guidance effect from agricultural technology departments could increase farmers’ willingness to adopt this mode in areas with incomplete infrastructure. Neighborhood effect and part-time employment had a negative impact on the difficulty of technology training, while the income expectation and environmental expectation stimulated farmers to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode. Based on these results, the following policy recommendations were put forward: firstly, the government should strengthen the technical training and guidance effect; second, farmland infrastructure should be improved; third, new agricultural management subjects should be fostered quickly; and finally, differentiated incentive and guidance policies should be formulated according to farmer types.
Key words:Rice-crayfish co-culture mode/
Farmers/
Planned behavior theory/
Adoption willingness/
Heterogeneity
HTML全文
图1农户稻虾共作模式采纳意愿理论分析框架
Figure1.Theoretical analysis framework of farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1样本农户的基本情况
Table1.Basic information of the sample farmers
| 指标 Index | 分类 Category | 频数 Frequency | 占比 Percent (%) | 指标 Index | 分类 Category | 频数 Frequency | 占比 Percent (%) | |
| 性别 Gender | 男 Male | 447 | 74.13 | 耕地面积 Area of arable land (hm2) | <2.00 | 352 | 58.37 | |
| 女 Female | 156 | 25.87 | 2.00~13.33 | 192 | 31.84 | |||
| 年龄 Age | ≤30 | 9 | 1.49 | >13.33 | 59 | 9.78 | ||
| 31~45 | 104 | 17.25 | 受教育程度 Education | 文盲 Illiterate | 105 | 17.41 | ||
| 46~60 | 333 | 55.22 | 小学 Primary school | 155 | 25.70 | |||
| >60 | 157 | 26.04 | 初中 Junior middle school | 204 | 33.83 | |||
| 新型农业经营主体 New agricultural business entities | 是 Yes | 254 | 42.12 | 高中或中专 High school or secondary school | 122 | 20.23 | ||
| 否 No | 349 | 57.88 | 大专及以上 College or above | 17 | 2.82 |
下载: 导出CSV表2农户稻虾共作模式采纳意愿模型变量赋值及描述性统计
Table2.Assignment of model variables and descriptive statistics of farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture
| 变量类型 Variable category | 变量名称 Variable name | 定义与赋值 Definition and assignment | 均值 Mean | 标准差 Standard deviation |
| 被解释变量 Independent variable | 稻虾共作模式采纳意愿 Adoption willingness | 愿意=1; 不愿意=2 Willing=1, unwilling=2 | 1.43 | 0.50 |
| 行为态度 Attitude toward the behavior | 环境预期 Environmental expectations | 稻虾共作模式是否减少环境污染: 是=1; 否=2 Does the rice-crayfish co-culture reduce environmental pollution? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.24 | 0.43 |
| 收益预期 Earnings expectations | 稻虾共作模式是否增加收益: 是=1; 否=2 Does the rice-crayfish co-culture increase income? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.25 | 0.43 | |
| 风险预期 Risk expectations | 稻虾共作模式是否存在环境风险: 是=1; 否=2 Does the rice-crayfish co-culture cause environmental risks? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.60 | 0.49 | |
| 主观规范 Subjective norm | 邻里效应 Neighborhood effect | 周边村民对您的稻虾共作模式采纳意愿是否有影响: 是=1, 否=2 Does the neighbourhood have any influence on your willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.43 | 0.50 |
| 政府宣传 Government propaganda | 政府对稻虾共作模式是否进行宣传: 是=1; 否=2 Does the government publicize the rice-crayfish co-culture? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.53 | 0.50 | |
| 农技部门指导 Agricultural technology department guidance | 农技部门是否开展稻虾共作技术指导: 是=1; 否=2 Does agricultural technology department conduct technical guidance on rice-crayfish co-culture? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.33 | 0.47 | |
| 知觉行为控制 Perceived behavioral control | 政府补贴 Policy subsidy | 政府对采纳稻虾共作模式是否有补贴: 是=1; 否=2 Does the government subsidize the adoption of rice-crayfish co-culture? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.27 | 0.44 |
| 技术培训 Technical training | 是否参加过稻虾共作相关技术培训: 是=1; 否=2 Do you participate in any technical training of rice-crayfish co-culture? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.42 | 0.50 | |
| 基础设施完备 Complete infrastructure | 稻虾共作农田基础设施是否完备: 是=1; 否=2 Does the infrastructure of rice-crayfish co-culture farmland complete? Yes=1, no=2 | 1.24 | 0.43 | |
| 技术学习难易程度 Difficulty of technical learning | 稻虾共作技术学习是否容易: 非常难=1, 较难=2, 一般=3, 较容易=4, 非常容易=5 Is it easy to learn rice-crayfish co-culture technology? Very difficult=1, difficult=2, general=3, easy=4, very easy=5 | 3.28 | 0.93 | |
| 控制变量 Control variable | 性别 Gender | 男=1, 女=2 Male=1, female=2 | 1.26 | 0.44 |
| 年龄 Age | 实际年龄(岁) Actual age (years) | 54.78 | 10.77 | |
| 受教育程度 Education | 文盲=1, 小学=2, 初中=3, 高中或中专=4, 大专及以上=5 Illiterate=1, primary school=2, junior middle school=3, high school or secondary school=4, college or above=5 | 2.65 | 1.07 | |
| 家庭耕地面积 Area of arable land | 实际耕地面积 Actual arable land area (hm2) | 96.72 | 126.39 | |
| 是否兼业 Concurrent business | 是=1, 否=2 Yes=1, no=2 | 1.52 | 0.50 | |
| 新型农业经营主体 New agricultural business entities | 是=1, 否=2 Yes=1, no=2 | 1.58 | 0.49 |
下载: 导出CSV表3农户稻虾共作模式采纳意愿模型不同解释变量的Binary Logistic回归模型的估计结果
Table3.Assignment of model variables and descriptive statistics of farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture
| 变量类型 Variable category | 变量名称 Variable name | 回归系数 Regression coefficient | 标准误差 Standard error | Wald检验 Wald test | 显著性 Significant | 优势比 Advantage ratio |
| 行为态度 Attitude toward the behavior | 环境预期 Environmental expectations | 0.152 | 0.261 | 0.582 | 0.560 | 1.164 |
| 收益预期 Earnings expectations | 1.092*** | 0.258 | 4.226 | 0.000 | 2.979 | |
| 风险预期 Risk expectations | ?0.124 | 0.229 | ?0.542 | 0.588 | 0.883 | |
| 主观规范 Subjective norm | 邻里效应 Neighborhood effect | ?0.784*** | 0.237 | ?3.305 | 0.001 | 0.456 |
| 政府宣传 Government propaganda | ?0.114 | 0.243 | ?0.467 | 0.640 | 0.892 | |
| 农技部门指导 Agricultural technology department guidance | ?0.321 | 0.251 | ?1.277 | 0.202 | 0.726 | |
| 知觉行为控制 Perceived behavioral control | 政府补贴 Policy subsidy | 0.539* | 0.283 | 1.906 | 0.057 | 1.714 |
| 技术培训 Technical training | 1.522*** | 0.226 | 6.733 | 0.000 | 4.581 | |
| 基础设施完备 Complete infrastructure | 0.930** | 1.129*** | 0.297 | 3.799 | 0.000 | |
| 技术学习难易程度 Difficulty of technical learning | 0.650*** | ?0.309** | 0.134 | ?2.301 | 0.021 | |
| 控制变量 Control variable | 性别 Gender | ?0.034 | 0.265 | ?0.129 | 0.897 | 0.966 |
| 年龄 Age | 0.004 | 0.011 | 0.377 | 0.706 | 1.004 | |
| 受教育程度 Education | ?0.284** | 0.116 | ?2.455 | 0.014 | 0.753 | |
| 家庭耕地面积 Area of arable land | ?0.001 | ?0.001 | 0.001 | ?0.723 | 0.469 | |
| 是否兼业 Concurrent business | ?0.588** | 0.235 | ?2.506 | 0.012 | 0.555 | |
| 新型农业经营主体 New agricultural business entities | 1.768*** | 1.254*** | 0.246 | 5.101 | 0.000 | |
| ***、**和*分别表示在P<1%、P<5%和P<10%水平上显著。***, ** and * represent the significance in the levels of P<1%, P<5% and P<10%, respectively. | ||||||
下载: 导出CSV表4不同限定条件下农户稻虾共作模式采纳意愿影响因素异质性
Table4.Heterogeneity of farmers’ willingness to adopt the rice-crayfish co-culture mode under different conditions
| 变量类型 Variable category | 变量名称 Variable name | 能增加收益 Income increase | 未增加收益 No increase in income | 受邻里效应 影响大 High neighborhood effect | 受邻里效应 影响小 Low neighborhood effect | 给予补贴 Grant subsidies | 未给予补贴 No subsidy | 参加培训 Training | 未参加培训 No training | 基础设施 完备 Complete infrastructure | 基础设施 不完备 Incomplete infrastructure | 技术学习 较容易 Technical learning is easier | 技术学习 较难 Technical learning is more difficult |
| 行为态度 Attitude toward the behavior | 环境预期 Environmental expectations | 1.96*** | |||||||||||
| 收益预期 Earnings expectations | — | — | 1.249*** | 1.091*** | 0.836*** | 2.100*** | 0.935*** | 1.325*** | 0.899*** | 1.755** | 1.184*** | ||
| 风险预期 Risk expectations | 1.622*** | ||||||||||||
| 主观规范 Subjective norm | 邻里效应 Neighborhood effect | ?0.647** | ?1.394** | — | — | ?1.126*** | ?1.077*** | ?0.568** | ?1.381** | ?2.192*** | |||
| 政府宣传 Government propaganda | |||||||||||||
| 农技部门指导 Agricultural technology department guidance | ?0.801** | ?1.407** | |||||||||||
| 知觉行为控制 Perceived behavioral control | 政府补贴 Policy subsidy | 1.986** | 1.344*** | — | — | 2.464*** | |||||||
| 技术培训 Technical training | 1.443*** | 2.459*** | 1.229*** | 1.956*** | 1.455*** | 1.922*** | — | — | 1.415*** | 2.245*** | 1.962*** | ||
| 基础设施完备 Complete infrastructure | 0.981*** | 2.307*** | 2.747*** | 1.241*** | 0.981** | — | — | 1.430*** | |||||
| 技术学习难易程度 Difficulty of technical learning | ?0.889*** | ?0.727*** | 0.689* | ?0.630*** | ?0.562*** | — | — | ||||||
| 控制变量 Control variable | 性别 Gender | ||||||||||||
| 年龄 Age | ?0.070* | ||||||||||||
| 受教育程度 Education | ?0.718** | ?0.470*** | ?1.113*** | ?0.446*** | ?0.347*** | ?0.364*** | |||||||
| 家庭耕地面积 Area of arable land | 0.018*** | ||||||||||||
| 是否兼业 Concurrent business | ?0.838*** | ?1.052*** | ?0.500* | ?1.109*** | ?0.532* | ?1.331** | |||||||
| 新型农业经营主体 New agricultural business entities | 1.100*** | 2.273*** | 0.761** | 1.501*** | 1.427*** | 1.078* | 1.628*** | 1.081*** | 1.313*** | 1.132*** | 2.537*** | ||
| ***、**和*分别表示在P<1%、P<5%和P<10%水平上显著。***, ** and * represent the significance in the levels of P<1%, P<5% and P<10%, respectively. | |||||||||||||
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 赵颖文, 吕火明. 粮食“十连增”背后的思考: 现代农业发展中面临的挑战与路径选择[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2015, 36(4): 561?567 ZHAO Y W, Lü H M. The challenges and path selection in the development of modern agriculture in the background of 10 years of continuous growth of grain production in China[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2015, 36(4): 561?567 |
| [2] | 李文华. 中国生态农业面临的机遇与挑战[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(1): 1?3 LI W H. The opportunity and challenge to ecological agriculture in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2004, 12(1): 1?3 |
| [3] | 张灿强, 沈贵银. 体系表征、多维困境与生态友好型农业的可能走向[J]. 改革, 2015, (5): 111?117 ZHANG C Q, SHEN G Y. System characterization, multidimensional predicament and the possible trend of eco-friendly agriculture[J]. Reform, 2015, (5): 111?117 |
| [4] | 李文华, 刘某承, 闵庆文. 中国生态农业的发展与展望[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32(6): 1015?1021 LI W H, LIU M C, MIN Q W. Progress and perspectives of China’s ecological agriculture[J]. Resources Science, 2010, 32(6): 1015?1021 |
| [5] | 贺峰, 雷海章. 论生态农业与中国农业现代化[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2005, 15(2): 23?26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.02.006 HE F, LEI H Z. Ecological agriculture: a necessary choice for agricultural modernization in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2005, 15(2): 23?26 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2005.02.006 |
| [6] | 李金才, 张士功, 邱建军, 等. 我国生态农业模式分类研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(5): 1275?1278 LI J C, ZHANG S G, QIU J J, et al. Categories of eco-agriculture models in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008, 16(5): 1275?1278 |
| [7] | 林孝丽, 周应恒. 稻田种养结合循环农业模式生态环境效应实证分析?以南方稻区稻-鱼模式为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2012, 22(3): 37?42 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.03.007 LIN X L, ZHOU Y H. An analysis on the eco-environment effect of circular agriculture mode of planting-culture in the paddy field[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2012, 22(3): 37?42 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2012.03.007 |
| [8] | 农业农村部渔业渔政管理局, 全国水产技术推广总站, 中国水产学会. 中国小龙虾产业发展报告(2018)[J]. 中国水产, 2018, (7): 20?27 Fisheries Administration of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Aquatic Technology Promotion Station, China Fishery Society. Report on the development of crayfish industry in China[J]. China Fisheries, 2018, (7): 20?27 |
| [9] | 曹凑贵, 江洋, 汪金平, 等. 稻虾共作模式的“双刃性”及可持续发展策略[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(9): 1245?1253 CAO C G, JIANG Y, WANG J P, et al. “Dual character” of rice-crayfish culture and strategy for its sustainable development[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(9): 1245?1253 |
| [10] | 杨彩艳, 齐振宏, 黄炜虹, 等. “稻虾共养”生态农业模式的化肥减量效应研究?基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)的估计[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(3): 758?766 YANG C Y, QI Z H, HUANG W H, et al. Study on the effect of chemical fertilizer reduction in the “shrimp and shrimp co-cultivation” ecological agriculture model: Estimation based on propensity score matching (PSM)[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(3): 758?766 |
| [11] | 李后建. 农户对循环农业技术采纳意愿的影响因素实证分析[J]. 中国农村观察, 2012, (2): 28?36, 66 LI H J. Empirical analysis on factors influencing farmers’ willingness to adopt circular agricultural technology[J]. China Rural Survey, 2012, (2): 28?36, 66 |
| [12] | 黄炜虹, 齐振宏, 邬兰娅, 等. 农户从事生态循环农业意愿与行为的决定: 市场收益还是政策激励?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 69?77 HUANG W H, QI Z H, WU L Y, et al. Determinants of farmers’ willingness and behavior to engage in ecological circular agriculture: market returns or policy incentives?[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(8): 69?77 |
| [13] | 黄炎忠, 罗小锋, 李容容, 等. 农户认知、外部环境与绿色农业生产意愿?基于湖北省632个农户调研数据[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(3): 680?687 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201803024 HUANG Y Z, LUO X F, LI R R, et al. Farmer cognition, external environment and willingness of green agriculture production: based on the survey data of 632 farmers in Hubei Province[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(3): 680?687 doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201803024 |
| [14] | 杨兴杰, 齐振宏, 陈雪婷, 等. 社会资本对农户采纳生态农业技术决策行为的影响?以稻虾共养技术为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(6): 183?198 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.06.18 YANG X J, QI Z H, CHEN X T, et al. Influence of social capital on farmers’ adoption of ecological agriculture technology decision-making behavior: taking rice and shrimp co-culture technology as example[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25(6): 183?198 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.06.18 |
| [15] | 刘可, 齐振宏, 杨彩艳, 等. 邻里效应与农技推广对农户稻虾共养技术采纳的影响分析?互补效应与替代效应[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(2): 401?411 LIU K, QI Z H, YANG C Y, et al. Analysis on the influence of neighbourhood effect and agricultural technology diffusion on farmer’s adoption of co-farming technology of rice and crayfish: complementary effects and substitution effects[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(2): 401?411 |
| [16] | 陈雪婷, 黄炜虹, 齐振宏, 等. 生态种养模式认知、采纳强度与收入效应?以长江中下游地区稻虾共作模式为例[J]. 中国农村观察, 2020, (10): 71?90 CHEN X T, HUANG W H, QI Z H, et al. Farmers’ cognition, adoption intensity and income effect of ecological breeding mode: A case study of rice-shrimp co-cultivation mode in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River[J]. China Rural Survey, 2020, (10): 71?90 |
| [17] | PAUL J, MODI A, PATEL J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2016, 29: 123?134 doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006 |
| [18] | 刘可, 齐振宏, 黄炜虹, 等. 资本禀赋异质性对农户生态生产行为的影响研究: 基于水平和结构的双重视角分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(2): 87?96 LIU K, QI Z H, HUANG W H, et al. Study on the influence of capital endowment heterogeneity on farmers’ ecological production behavior: Based on the analysis of level and structure[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(2): 87?96 |
| [19] | 王学婷, 何可, 张俊飚, 等. 农户对环境友好型技术的采纳意愿及异质性分析?以湖北省为例[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(6): 197?209 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.06.22 WANG X T, HE K, ZHANG J B, et al. Farmers’ willingness to adopt environment friendly technologies and their heterogeneity: Taking Hubei Province as an example[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2018, 23(6): 197?209 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2018.06.22 |
| [20] | 吴雪莲, 张俊飚, 何可. 农户高效农药喷雾技术采纳意愿?影响因素及其差异性分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(4): 137?148 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.04.18 WU X L, ZHANG J B, HE K. Farmers’ willingness to adopt the effective pesticide spraying technology: Influencing factors and group heterogeneity[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016, 21(4): 137?148 doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2016.04.18 |
| [21] | 胡荣华. 农户兼业行为研究?以南京市为例的分析[J]. 南京社会科学, 2000, (7): 87?92 HU R H. Study on the behavior of farmers in part-time employment: A case study of Nanjing[J]. Social Sciences in Nanjing, 2000, (7): 87?92 |
| [22] | 闵继胜, 孔祥智. 新型农业经营主体的模式创新与农业清洁生产?基于黑龙江仁发农机专业合作社的案例分析[J]. 江海学刊, 2017, (4): 67?73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-856X.2017.04.011 MIN J S, KONG X Z. Mode innovation of new-type agricultural management entities and agricultural clean production: Case study based on Renfa professional cooperatives of agricultural machinery of Heilongjiang Province[J]. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2017, (4): 67?73 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-856X.2017.04.011 |
| [23] | 黄炜虹, 齐振宏, 邬兰娅, 等. 农户对生态农业模式的偏好与额外投入水平研究?基于重庆市358户农户调查数据[J]. 农业技术经济, 2016, (11): 34?43 HUANG W H, QI Z H, WU L Y, et al. Research on farmers’ preference for ecological agriculture models and additional input levels: Based on survey data of 358 farmers from Chongqing City[J]. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2016, (11): 34?43 |
| [24] | 谢贤鑫, 陈美球. 农户生态耕种采纳意愿及其异质性分析?基于TPB框架的实证研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(5): 1185?1196 XIE X X, CHEN M Q. Farmers’ willingness to adopt ecological farming and their heterogeneity: based on the TPB framework[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28(5): 1185?1196 |
| [25] | 王志刚, 汪超, 许晓源. 农户认知和采纳创意农业的机制: 基于北京城郊四区果树产业的问卷调查[J]. 中国农村观察, 2010, (4): 33?43 WANG Z G, WANG C, XU X Y. The mechanism for farmers’ cognizing and adopting creative agricultural production method: an investigation based on fruit industry in four rural districts of Beijing City[J]. China Rural Survey, 2010, (4): 33?43 |
| [26] | 桑贤策, 罗小锋, 黄炎忠, 等. 政策激励、生态认知与农户有机肥施用行为?基于有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2021, 29(7): 1274?1284 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978 SANG X C, LUO X F, HUANG Y Z, et al. Policy incentives, ecological cognition and organic fertilizer application of farmers: A moderated mediation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2021, 29(7): 1274?1284 doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.200978 |
| [27] | 杨兴杰, 齐振宏, 陈雪婷, 等. 政府培训、技术认知与农户生态农业技术采纳行为?以稻虾共养技术为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(5): 198?208 YANG X J, QI Z H, CHEN X T, et al. Government training, technology cognition and farmer eco-agricultural technology adoption behavior: taking rice shrimp co-culture technology as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(5): 198?208 |
