陈环宇1, 2,
李劲松1, 2,
田宇1, 2,
封晓辉2,
刘小京1, 2,
郭凯1, 2,,
1.中国科学院遗传与发育生物学研究所农业资源研究中心/中国科学院农业水资源重点实验室/河北省土壤生态学重点实验室 石家庄 050022
2.中国科学院大学 北京 100049
基金项目: 中国科学院科技服务网络(STS)计划项目KFZD-SW-112-4
国家自然科学基金项目51809260
详细信息
作者简介:杨策, 主要从事耐盐植物生理生态研究。E-mail:yangcesjz@163.com
通讯作者:郭凯, 主要从事盐碱地水土资源高效利用研究。E-mail:guokai@sjziam.ac.cn
中图分类号:S156.4计量
文章访问数:568
HTML全文浏览量:15
PDF下载量:630
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2019-03-09
录用日期:2019-04-23
刊出日期:2019-10-01
Soil improving effect of Suaeda salsa on heavy coastal saline-alkaline land
YANG Ce1, 2,,CHEN Huanyu1, 2,
LI Jinsong1, 2,
TIAN Yu1, 2,
FENG Xiaohui2,
LIU Xiaojing1, 2,
GUO Kai1, 2,,
1. Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences/Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources of Chinese Academy of Sciences/Hebei Key Laboratory of Soil Ecology, Shijiazhuang 050022, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Funds: The study was supported by the Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of Chinese Academy of SciencesKFZD-SW-112-4
the National Natural Science Foundation of China51809260
More Information
Corresponding author:GUO Kai, E-mail: guokai@sjziam.ac.cn
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:盐地碱蓬是滨海盐碱地生态系统群落演替中的先锋物种,也是植被建设的重要植物。为探究盐地碱蓬对滨海盐碱地的改土效应以及作用机制,通过滨海平原盐碱地原生盐地碱蓬群落土壤调查,结合室内土柱种植试验,研究了盐地碱蓬生长对滨海盐土土壤结构、土壤水分入渗特征及土壤盐分分布的影响,比较了盐地碱蓬通过植株吸收盐分和通过改善土壤结构促进盐分淋洗对滨海盐碱地降盐、改土的效果。结果表明:1)盐地碱蓬生长对滨海盐土土壤结构有明显的改善效果,野外生长盐地碱蓬的0~20 cm土层土壤容重显著低于裸地,而土壤孔隙度显著高于裸地地块;室内土柱种植盐地碱蓬降低了各层土壤容重,平均降低6.16%;增加了各层土壤孔隙度,增加1.59%~5.15%。2)盐地碱蓬生长显著提升了滨海盐土土壤水分入渗性能。野外入渗试验结果显示,相同入渗时间内,生长盐地碱蓬的土壤累积入渗量、初始入渗率及稳定入渗率分别是裸地的3.6倍、2.5倍和3.0倍。室内土柱模拟试验结果显示,盐地碱蓬处理土壤的初始入渗率为0.08 mm·min-1,是裸地处理的2.6倍;稳定入渗率为0.03 mm·min-1,是裸地处理的3.0倍。3)盐地碱蓬的生长明显降低了土壤含盐量,盐地碱蓬收获后,野外调查试验和室内土柱试验中裸地处理0~40 cm土层土壤含盐量分别降低2.67%和12.98%,而盐地碱蓬处理分别降低12.08%和49.28%。野外调查和室内土柱试验中,盐地碱蓬植株移走的盐量分别占总脱盐量的5.60%和2.26%,淋洗脱盐量分别占总脱盐量的94.40%和97.74%。以上结果表明,滨海重盐碱地种植盐地碱蓬具有明显的降低土壤含盐量的作用,这种作用除植株吸收带走部分盐分外,更重要的是通过盐地碱蓬的生长改善了土壤结构、加速了土壤水分入渗、促进了土壤盐分的淋洗。
关键词:滨海盐土/
盐地碱蓬/
土壤结构/
水分入渗/
淋洗脱盐/
土壤盐分
Abstract:Suaeda salsa is a pioneer species in community succession of coastal saline-alkali ecosystems, as well as an important plant for vegetation construction. In order to explore the soil improvement effect and mechanism of S. salsa on coastal saline-alkali land, the effects of S. salsa growth on soil structure, water infiltration and salt distribution were studied through soil investigation of a primary S. salsa community and indoor soil column planting experiment. Meanwhile, the effects of salt absorption by S. salsa and salt leaching by soil structure promoting were compared and evaluated. The results showed that:1) the growth of S. salsa had an obvious effect on improving the soil structure of coastal saline soil. In the field investigation, the soil bulk density in the 0-20 cm soil layer of S. salsa patch was significantly lower than that in the bare land patch, and the soil porosity was significantly higher than the bare land patch. In the soil column experiment, planting S. salsa reduced soil bulk density of each soil layer, with an average decrease of 6.16%, an increased soil porosity by 1.59%-5.15%. 2) The growth of S. salsa significantly promoted the soil water infiltration capability of coastal saline soil. Field infiltration test results showed that, in the same infiltration time, the cumulative infiltration, initial infiltration rate and stable infiltration rate of S. salsa patch were 3.6, 2.5 and 3.0 times of bare land patch, respectively. The results of soil column simulation tests showed that the initial infiltration rate of S. salsa treatment was 0.08 mm·min-1, which was 2.6 times that of bare land treatment, and the stable infiltration rate was 0.03 mm·min-1, which was 3 times that of bare land treatment. 3) The growth of S. salsa significantly reduced the soil salinity. After the harvest of S. salsa in the field investigation and soil column experiment, the soil salinity in the 0-40 cm soil layer in bare land treatment decreased by 2.67% and 12.98% respectively, while that of S. salsa treatment decreased by 12.08% and 49.28% respectively. In the field investigation and soil column experiment, 5.60% and 2.26% of the total desalination were due to harvesting S. salsa, however, leaching desalination accounted for 94.40% and 97.74% of total desalination, respectively. The above results show that planting S. salsa in coastal heavy saline-alkali land has an obvious effect on reducing soil salinity. Besides plant absorption, it also promoted soil salt leaching through improving soil structure and accelerating soil water infiltration.
Key words:Coastal saline soil/
Suaeda salsa/
Soil structure/
Water infiltration/
Leaching desalination/
Soil salinity
HTML全文

图12018年试验区各月累积降雨量
Figure1.Monthly cumulative rainfall in the study area in 2018


图2野外原生盐地碱蓬地块与裸地地块土壤容重和孔隙度
不同小写字母表示同一土层不同土壤之间差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Figure2.Soil bulk densities and porosities of native Suaeda salsa and bare land patches of the field investigation
Different lowercase letters indicated the significant differences between different soils in the same soil layer (P < 0.05).


图3室内土柱盐地碱蓬生长对土壤容重和孔隙度的影响
不同小写字母表示同一土层不同土壤之间差异显著(P < 0.05)。
Figure3.Effects of Suaeda salsa growth on soil bulk density and porosity in the soil column experiment
Different lowercase letters indicated the significant differences between different soils in the same soil layer (P < 0.05).


图4盐地碱蓬生长对土壤累积入渗量的影响(左为野外调查; 右为室内土柱试验)
Figure4.Effect of Suaeda salsa growth on soil cumulative infiltration (left is the field investigation; right is the soil column experiment)


图5盐地碱蓬地块和裸地地块0~60 cm土层土壤盐分动态
Figure5.Soil salt content dynamics of Suaeda salsa land and bare land patches at 0-60 cm soil layer


图6室内土柱盐地碱蓬生长对土壤盐分分布的影响
Figure6.Effect of Suaeda salsa growth on soil salt distribution in the soil column experiment

表1种植盐地碱蓬对土壤入渗率的影响
Table1.Effect of Suaeda salsa growth on soil infiltration rates
mm·min-1 | |||||
入渗率 Infiltration rate | 野外调查Field investigation | 土柱试验Soil column experiment | |||
裸地 Bare land | 盐地碱蓬地块 Land of Suaeda salsa | 裸地 Bare land | 盐地碱蓬地块 Land of Suaeda salsa | ||
初始入渗率Initial infiltration rate | 0.06±0.013 | 0.15±0.021 | 0.03±0.002 | 0.08±0.021 | |
稳定入渗率Stable infiltration rate | 0.03±0.010 | 0.09±0.006 | 0.01±0.004 | 0.03±0.012 |

表2盐地碱蓬对滨海盐土降盐效应分析
Table2.Analysis of desalination effect of Suaeda salsa on coastal saline soil
处理 Treatment | 土壤总盐量Total salt in soil (t·hm-2) | 土壤总脱盐量 Total desalination of soil (t·hm-2) | 土壤总脱盐率 Total desalination rate of soil (%) | ||
初始值 Initial value | 收获后 After harvest | ||||
野外调查 Field investigation | 裸地Bare land | 179.84 | 175.04 | 4.80 | 2.67 |
盐地碱蓬地块 Land of suaeda salsa | 87.12 | 76.60 | 10.52 | 12.08 | |
室内土柱试验 Soil column experiment | 裸地Bare land | 233.97 | 203.60 | 30.37 | 12.98 |
盐地碱蓬地块 Land of suaeda salsa | 233.97 | 115.30 | 118.67 | 49.28 |

表3盐地碱蓬植株对土壤盐分的移除量
Table3.Amount of salt removal from saline soil by Suaeda salsa
离子 Ion | 野外调查Field investigation | 室内土柱试验Soil column experiment | |||
含量Content (mg·g-1) | 移出量 Removal (kg·hm-2) | 含量 Content (mg·g-1) | 移出量 Removal (kg·hm-2) | ||
Ca2+ | 10.60±0.57 | 36.68±1.98 | 11.41±0.21 | 118.18±2.17 | |
Mg2+ | 0.92±0.08 | 3.17±0.26 | 1.11±0.01 | 11.45±0.13 | |
K+ | 0.24±0.07 | 0.83±0.25 | 0.12±0.01 | 1.19±0.09 | |
Na+ | 60.72±5.27 | 210.19±18.26 | 102.55±6.60 | 1 062.32±68.36 | |
Cl- | 93.74±9.4 | 324.46±32.53 | 122.68±3.77 | 1 270.79±39.09 | |
SO42- | 9.02±0.82 | 31.21±2.83 | 21.47±1.41 | 222.44±14.65 | |
NO3- | 1.19±0.09 | 4.11±0.31 | 0.91±0.08 | 9.43±0.82 | |
总盐分Total salinity | 176.42±32.26 | 610.66±111.65 | 260.24±7.45 | 2 695.80±77.22 | |
野外调查和室内土柱试验中盐地碱蓬的生物量分别346.14 g·m-2和1 035.88 g·m-2。The biomasses of Suaeda salsa in the field investigation and soil column experiment are 346.14 g·m-2 and 1 035.88 g·m-2, respectively. |

参考文献
[1] | 王遵亲, 祝寿泉, 俞仁培, 等.中国盐渍土[M].北京:科学出版社, 1993 WANG Z Q, ZHU S Q, YU R P, et al. Salt-Affected Soils in China[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1993 |
[2] | 刘小京.环渤海缺水区盐碱地改良利用技术研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(10):1521-1527 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201810011 LIU X J. Reclamation and utilization of saline soils in water-scarce regions of Bohai Sea[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018, 26(10):1521-1527 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201810011 |
[3] | QADIR M, GHAFOOR A, MURTAZA G. Amelioration strategies for saline soils:A review[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2000, 11(6):501-521 doi: 10.1002-1099-145X(200011-12)11-6-501--AID-LDR405-3.0.CO%3b2-S/ |
[4] | BHUIYAN M S I, RAMAN A, HODGKINS D, et al. Influence of high levels of Na+ and Cl- on ion concentration, growth, and photosynthetic performance of three salt-tolerant plants[J]. Flora, 2017, 228:1-9 doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2016.12.010 |
[5] | HASANUZZAMAN M, NAHAR K, ALAM M M, et al. Potential use of halophytes to remediate saline soils[J]. BioMed Research International, 2014, 2014:589341 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=Doaj000003953801 |
[6] | 张文军, 玉井重信, 矢部勝彦, 等.利用柽柳改良盐碱地土壤的机制与措施初报[J].内蒙古林业科技, 2003, (4):3-7 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2003.04.001 ZHANG W J, SHIGENOBU T, KATSUHIKD Y, et al. Mechanism and measures for improving soil in alkali-saline land by use of Tamarix chinensis Lour.[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Science & Technology, 2003, (4):3-7 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2003.04.001 |
[7] | AKHTER J, MURRAY R, MAHMOOD K, et al. Improvement of degraded physical properties of a saline-sodic soil by reclamation with kallar grass (Leptochloa fusca)[J]. Plant and Soil, 2004, 258(1):207-216 doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016551.08880.6b |
[8] | 胡发成.种植苜蓿改良培肥地力的研究初报[J].草业科学, 2005, 22(8):47-49 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.08.012 HU F C. Initial research report on soil fertility improvement by planting Medicago sativa[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2005, 22(8):47-49 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2005.08.012 |
[9] | 肖克飚, 吴普特, 雷金银, 等.不同类型耐盐植物对盐碱土生物改良研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2013, 31(12):2433-2440 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-NHBH201212019.htm XIAO K B, WU P T, LEI J Y, et al. Bio-reclamation of different halophytes on saline-alkali soil[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2013, 31(12):2433-2440 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-NHBH201212019.htm |
[10] | 雷金银, 张建宁, 班乃荣, 等.不同类型耐盐植物对盐碱土物理性质的影响[J].宁夏农林科技, 2011, 52(12):58-60 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-204X.2011.12.025 LEI J Y, ZHANG J N, BAN N R, et al. Effects of different salt-tolerant plants on physical properties of saline-alkali soil[J]. Ningxia Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2011, 52(12):58-60 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-204X.2011.12.025 |
[11] | QADIR M, QURESHI R H, AHMAD N. Reclamation of a saline-sodic soil by gypsum and Leptochloa fusca[J]. Geoderma, 1996, 74(3/4):207-217 doi: 10.1016-S0016-7061(96)00061-4/ |
[12] | 杨军, 孙兆军, 罗成科, 等.水盐调控措施改良龟裂碱土提高油葵产量[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(18):121-128 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.18.018 YANG J, SUN Z J, LUO C K, et al. Effect of salt-water regulation on improving takyric solonetz land and yield of oil sunflower[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(18):121-128 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.18.018 |
[13] | 李卓, 刘永红, 杨勤.土壤水分入渗影响机制研究综述[J].灌溉排水学报, 2011, 30(5):124-130 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201105028 LI Z, LIU Y H, YANG Q. Review on effects mechanism of soil water infiltration[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2011, 30(5):124-130 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201105028 |
[14] | 王国梁, 刘国彬.黄土丘陵区长芒草群落对土壤水分入渗的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2009, 23(3):227-231 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2009.03.049 WANG G L, LIU G B. Effect of Stipa bungeana communities on soil infiltration in soil profile in loess hilly region[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(3):227-231 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2009.03.049 |
[15] | 王鑫皓, 王云琦, 马超, 等.根系构型对土壤渗透性能的影响[J].中国水土保持科学, 2018, 16(4):73-82 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgstbckx201804010 WANG X H, WANG Y Q, MA C, et al. Effect of root architecture on soil permeability[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 16(4):73-82 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgstbckx201804010 |
[16] | ZHANG J B, YANG J S, YAO R J, et al. The effects of farmyard manure and mulch on soil physical properties in a reclaimed coastal tidal flat salt-affected soil[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(8):1782-1790 doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60530-4 |
[17] | 贾利梅, 毛伟兵, 孙玉霞, 等.不同改良材料对粘质盐土物理性状和棉花产量的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2017, 33(13):81-87 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnxtb201713013 JIA L M, MAO W B, SUN Y X, et al. Effects of different modified materials on physical properties of clayey saline soil and yield of cotton[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(13):81-87 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnxtb201713013 |
[18] | 张立宾, 徐化凌, 赵庚星.碱蓬的耐盐能力及其对滨海盐渍土的改良效果[J].土壤, 2007, 39(2):310-313 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tr200702027 ZHANG L B, XU H L, ZHAO G X. Salt tolerance of Suaeda salsa and its soil ameliorating effect on coastal saline soil[J]. Soils, 2007, 39(2):310-313 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tr200702027 |
[19] | 罗廷彬, 任崴, 李彦, 等.北疆盐碱地采用生物措施后的土壤盐分变化[J].土壤通报, 2005, 36(3):304-308 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2005.03.004 LUO Y B, REN W, LI Y, et al. Salinity changes for 15 years of bioreclamation of saline soil in Xinjiang[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2005, 36(3):304-308 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2005.03.004 |
[20] | 封晓辉, 张秀梅, 刘小京, 等.滨海重盐碱地人工栽植柽柳生长动态及生态效应[J].中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(10):1233-1240 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201310008 FENG X H, ZHANG X M, LIU X J, et al. Growth dynamics of Tamarix chinensis plantations in heavy-saline coastal lands and related ecological effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(10):1233-1240 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201310008 |
[21] | 赵阳, 余新晓, 吴海龙, 等.华北土石山区典型森林枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J].水土保持学报, 2011, 25(6):148-152 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqsystbcxb201106032 ZHAO Y, YU X X, WU H L, et al. Hydrological effects of forest litters and soil in rocky mountain area of northern China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25(6):148-152 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqsystbcxb201106032 |
[22] | 郭凯, 巨兆强, 封晓辉, 等.咸水结冰灌溉改良盐碱地的研究进展及展望[J].中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(8):1016-1024 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201608004 GUO K, JU Z Q, FENG X H, et al. Advances and expectations of researches on saline soil reclamation by freezing saline water irrigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(8):1016-1024 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201608004 |
[23] | 史文娟, 杨军强, 马媛.旱区盐碱地盐生植物改良研究动态与分析[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2015, 26(5):229-234 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbszyysgc201505045 SHI W J, YANG J Q, MA Y. Review on saline-alkali soil improvement with planting halophyte method in arid region[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2015, 26(5):229-234 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbszyysgc201505045 |
[24] | 白世红, 马风云, 侯栋, 等.黄河三角洲植被演替过程种群生态位变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(3):581-587 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201003023 BAI S H, MA F Y, HOU D, et al. Change in population niche during vegetation community succession in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010, 18(3):581-587 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201003023 |
[25] | 钱兵, 顾克余, 赫明涛, 等.盐地碱蓬的生态生物学特性及栽培技术[J].中国野生植物资源, 2000, 19(6):62-63 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200001315374 QIAN B, GU K Y, HE M T, et al. Ecological and biological characteristics and cultivation techniques of Suaeda Salsa[J]. Chinese Wild Plant Resources, 2000, 19(6):62-63 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK200001315374 |
[26] | 邹桂梅, 苏德荣, 黄明勇, 等.人工种植盐地碱蓬改良吹填土的试验研究[J].草业科学, 2010, 27(4):51-56 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caoyekx201004012 ZOU G M, SU D R, HUANG M Y, et al. Effect of planting Suaeda salsa on improvement of dredger filled soil[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(4):51-56 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caoyekx201004012 |
[27] | 马志勇.灌溉淋洗条件下土壤盐分动态变化规律探究[J].水利科技与经济, 2016, 22(9):40-43 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2016.09.012 MA Z Y. To explore the dynamic variation of soil salt leaching irrigation[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2016, 22(9):40-43 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7175.2016.09.012 |
[28] | 侯贺贺.黄河三角洲盐碱地生物措施改良效果研究[D].泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10434-1014347207.htm HOU H H. Study on the improvement effects by biological measures in the Yellow River Delta saline-alkali soil[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10434-1014347207.htm |
[29] | 迟春明, 王志春.苏打碱土盐分淋洗与饱和导水率的关系[J].土壤学报, 2010, 47(2):374-377 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trxb201002025 CHI C M, WANG Z C. Relationship between salts leaching and saturated hydraulic conductivity of sodic soils[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(2):374-377 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trxb201002025 |
[30] | 白冰, 陈效民, 秦淑平.黄河三角洲滨海盐渍土饱和导水率的研究[J].土壤通报, 2005, 36(3):321-323 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2005.03.008 BAI B, CHEN X M, QIN S P. Saturated hydraulic conductivity of seashore saline soil in Yellow River Delta[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2005, 36(3):321-323 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2005.03.008 |
[31] | 吕殿青, 邵明安, 刘春平.容重对土壤饱和水分运动参数的影响[J].水土保持学报, 2006, 20(3):154-157 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.03.037 LYU D Q, SHAO M A, LIU C P. Effect of bulk density on soil saturated water movement parameters[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006, 20(3):154-157 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2006.03.037 |
[32] | 吴华山, 陈效民, 叶民标, 等.太湖地区主要水稻土的饱和导水率及其影响因素研究[J].灌溉排水学报, 2006, 25(2):46-49 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps200602012 WU H S, CHEN X M, YE M B, et al. Study on the soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and the infection factors of the main paddy soils in Tai-lake Region[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2006, 25(2):46-49 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps200602012 |
[33] | 张鹏锐, 李旭霖, 崔德杰, 等.滨海重盐碱地不同土地利用方式的水盐特征[J].水土保持学报, 2015, 29(2):117-121 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqsystbcxb201502022 ZHANG P R, LI X L, CUI D J, et al. Characteristics of water and salt under different land use in heavy coastal saline-alkaline land[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(2):117-121 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trqsystbcxb201502022 |
[34] | 王立艳, 潘洁, 肖辉, 等.种植耐盐植物对滨海盐碱地土壤盐分的影响[J].华北农学报, 2014, 29(5):226-231 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hbnxb201405046 WANG L Y, PAN J, XIAO H, et al. Effect of soluble salt on planting salt-tolerant plants of coastal saline soil[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2014, 29(5):226-231 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hbnxb201405046 |
[35] | 祁通, 孙阳讯, 黄建, 等.两种盐生植物在南北疆地区的适生性及吸盐能力[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2017, (1):144-148 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trfl201701024 QI T, SUN Y X, HUANG J, et al. The adaptability and salt absorption ability of two kinds of halophyte in southern and northern of Xinjiang[J]. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2017, (1):144-148 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trfl201701024 |
[36] | KHATUN M, HAFIZ M H R, HASAN M A, et al. Responses of wheat genotypes to salt stress in relation to germination and seedling growth[J]. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management, 2013, 4(4):635-640 |
[37] | RABHI M, FERCHICHI S, JOUINI J, et al. Phytodesalination of a salt-affected soil with the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum L. to arrange in advance the requirements for the successful growth of a glycophytic crop[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(17):6822-6828 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.097 |
[38] | 郭洋, 盛建东, 陈波浪, 等. 3种盐生植物干物质积累与养分吸收特征[J].干旱区研究, 2016, 33(1):144-149 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqyj201601018 GUO Y, SHENG J D, CHEN B L, et al. Study on dry matter accumulation and nutriention absorption of three halophytes under artificial planting condition[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(1):144-149 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqyj201601018 |