张旺旺1, ?,,
刘翠红2,
周佳琪1,
朱昆仑3
1.沈阳农业大学水利学院 沈阳 110866
2.沈阳农业大学工程学院 沈阳 110866
3.山东天壮环保科技有限公司济南 250110
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目51509155
国家自然科学基金项目51609137
辽宁省自然科学基金项目20180550617
国家重点研发计划重点专项2018YFD0300301
详细信息
作者简介:孙仕军, 主要从事农业高效用水和水资源综合利用研究, E-mail:sunshijun2000@yeah.net
张旺旺, 主要从事农业节水研究, E-mail:447813802@qq.com
?同等贡献者中图分类号:S513.047
计量
文章访问数:717
HTML全文浏览量:3
PDF下载量:484
被引次数:0
出版历程
收稿日期:2018-06-12
录用日期:2018-09-24
刊出日期:2019-01-01
Degradation property of oxo-biodegradable plastic film and its mulching effect on soil moisture, soil temperature and maize growth in rainfed Northeast China
SUN Shijun1, ?,,ZHANG Wangwang1, ?,,
LIU Cuihong2,
ZHOU Jiaqi1,
ZHU Kunlun3
1. College of Water Conservancy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
2. College of Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China
3. Eco-Benign Plastics Technology Co., Ltd, Jinan 250110, China
Funds: the National Natural Science Foundation of China51509155
the National Natural Science Foundation of China51609137
the Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning20180550617
the Special Program for National Key Research and Development Project of China2018YFD0300301
? Equal contributors
摘要
HTML全文
图
参考文献
相关文章
施引文献
资源附件
访问统计
摘要
摘要:为解决当前农田大量残膜污染问题，设置3种不同降解速率的氧化生物双降解地膜（降解a、降解b、降解c）和普通塑料地膜覆盖及露地对照5个玉米种植试验，研究氧化生物双降解地膜田间降解性能（降解率、拉伸强度和断裂伸长率）及其对土壤水热、玉米生长状况及产量的影响。结果表明：1）不同降解速率氧化生物双降解地膜降解梯度与预期基本相符，3种降解速率的地膜全生育期降解率分别为14.2%、10.0%和6.5%，差异达显著水平。降解a、降解b和降解c地膜在田间覆盖120 d后，垄上地膜拉伸强度损失率分别为30.4%、20.3%和19.1%，断裂伸长率损失率为10.4%、13.5%和5.0%，垄侧地膜拉伸强度损失率为59.0%、50.7%和45.6%，断裂伸长率损失率为71.7%、55.6%和51.0%，其中降解a拉伸强度和断裂伸长率与降解b和降解c相比均达显著差异水平，且垄侧各降解地膜机械性能损失率显著大于垄上地膜。2）氧化生物双降解地膜显著提高了玉米生育前期5~25 cm层土壤温度和0~40 cm层土壤含水率，与露地相比，降解a、降解b和降解c处理下5~25 cm土层平均温度分别提高了4.5℃、4.4℃和4.4℃，0~40 cm土层含水率分别提高了3.2%、2.9%和2.2%。3）氧化生物双降解地膜加快了玉米生育进程，使玉米植株提前3 d出苗，缩短生育期5~7 d，且玉米株高和叶面积指数均显著高于露地处理，略优于普通地膜。4）在产量构成和最终产量方面，氧化生物双降解地膜与普通塑料地膜覆盖均较露地处理增加了玉米穗长、穗粗及百粒重，降解a、降解b、降解c和普通地膜处理较露地对照增产率分别达14.3%、14.3%、10.4%和13.2%。研究认为，氧化生物双降解地膜覆盖具有明显的增温保墒效应，与普通地膜相同，能够显著提高玉米产量，并且可以通过改变配方调节其降解速率。本研究成果可为氧化生物可降解地膜替代普通地膜及其在东北地区推广应用提供科学依据。
关键词:氧化生物双降解地膜/
降解性能/
土壤温度/
土壤水分/
玉米生长发育/
玉米产量
Abstract:The growing use of plastic film in agriculture has significantly increased crop production as it positively enhances the soil environment. However, the massive disposal of this material has as well increased environmental risk. One way to solve this problem is by developing a substitutable mulching film such as biodegradable ?lms that are ultimately convertible into water, carbon dioxide and soil organic matter by micro-organisms. Oxo-biodegradable plastic film is a newly developed biodegradable film that can increase soil water, soil temperature and crop yield and it also has satisfactory degradation properties. In this study, series of experiments were conducted to determine the degradation properties (degradation rate, tensile strength and elongation) of oxo-biodegradable plastic films and the effects of different mulching treatments on soil moisture, soil temperature, maize growth and maize yield. The mulching experiment was conducted using three kinds of oxo-biodegradable plastic films with different ingredients and different degradation rates (Degradation a, Degradation b and Degradation c) and common plastic film, and using un-mulched field as the control. Maize was ridge-cultivated and films covered all soil surface. The results showed that:1) biodegradation rate of different oxo-biodegradable films met soil and crop requirements for high yield production. Degradation rates of Degradation a, Degradation b and Degradation c after maize harvesting were respectively 14.2%, 10.0% and 6.5%. While the tensile strength on the ridge tops of Degradation a, Degradation b and Degradation c were decreased respectively by 30.4%, 20.3% and 19.1%, elongation decreased by 10.4%, 13.5% and 5.0% under mulching in the field for 120 days. Meanwhile, tensile strength of side ridges decreased respectively by 59.0%, 50.7% and 45.6% for Degradation a, Degradation b and Degradation c and elongation by 71.7%, 55.6% and 51.0%. Decrease in degradation was significantly different for different films. Furthermore, decrease in degradation properties of the film on ridge side was significantly more than that on the top of ridge. 2) Compared with the control, oxo-biodegradable plastic film mulching significantly increased soil temperature in the 5-25 cm soil layer and soil moisture in the 0-40 cm soil layer on early maize growth period. Degradation a, Degradation b and Degradation c treatments increased average soil temperature in the 5-25 cm soil layers respectively by 4.5℃, 4.4℃ and 4.4℃. Soil moistures under Degradation a, Degradation b and Degradation c treatments were increased respectively by 3.2%, 2.9% and 2.2% in the 0-40 cm soil layer. 3) Oxo-biodegradable plastic film mulching promoted maize growth, enhanced early maize emergence and shortened overall growth period by 5-7 days. Also the height and LAI of maize under oxo-biodegradable plastic film mulching were significantly higher than those under un-mulched treatment and slightly better than that under common plastic film mulching. 4) Compared with the control treatment, three oxo-biodegradable plastic films and common plastic film treatments increased ear length, ear diameter and 100-kernel weight of maize. At the same time, Degradation a, Degradation b and Degradation c and common film treatments significantly increased maize yield by 14.3%, 14.3%, 10.4% and 13.2%, respectively. Based on the study, oxo-biodegradable plastic film mulching significantly increased soil temperature and moisture and enhanced maize yield more than common film mulching, with degradation rate adjustable by changing ingredients. The results provided scientific basis for the replacement of common plastic films by oxo-biodegradable plastic films and for the development, popularization and application of oxo-biodegradable plastic films in Northeast China.
Key words:Oxo-biodegradable plastic film/
Degradable property/
Soil temperature/
Soil moisture/
Maize growth/
Maize yield
? Equal contributors
注释:
1) ?同等贡献者
HTML全文
图1氧化生物双降解地膜覆盖下玉米全生育期5~25 cm层土壤温度的变化(a: 5 cm土层; b: 10 cm土层; c: 15 cm土层; d: 20 cm土层; e: 25 cm土层)
Figure1.Temperature changes of 5-25 cm soil layer during whole growth period of maize under different oxo-biodegradable plastic films mulching treatments (a: 5 cm soil layer; b: 10 cm soil layer; c: 15 cm soil layer; d: 20 cm soil layer; e: 25 cm soil layer)
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
图2不同氧化生物双降解地膜覆盖对玉米生育期0~60 cm层土壤含水率变化的影响(A: 0~40 cm土层; B: 40~60 cm土层)
不同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平上差异显著。
Figure2.Moisture changes of 0-60 cm soil layer during different growth periods of maize under different oxo-biodegradable plastic films mulching treatments (A: 0-40 cm soil layer; B: 40-60 cm soil layer)
Different lowercase letters mean significant differences at 0.05 level among different treatments.
下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片表1不同覆盖时间下氧化生物双降解地膜表观降解程度及降解率
Table1.Apparent degradation and degradation rates of different oxo-biodegradable plastic films at different mulching times
| 处理 Treatment | 覆膜不同时间降解程度1) Degradation after different times of mulching | 地膜质量变化 Change of film weight | ||||||||||
| 20 d | 30 d | 40 d | 60 d | 80 d | 110 d | 130 d | 铺膜前 Before mulching (g·m-1)2) | 收获后 After harvesting (g·m-1) | 降解率 Degradation rate (%) | |||
| 降解a Degradable film a | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9.205 4±0.179 1b3) | 7.894 2±0.075 3b | 14.2±1.8a | ||
| 降解b Degradable film b | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9.193 7±0.211 8b | 8.270 2±0.297 9b | 10.0±2.2b | ||
| 降解c Degradable film c | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8.797 1±0.044 7c | 8.228 4±0.051 0b | 6.5±0.9c | ||
| 普通地膜 Common film | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.253 9±0.079 0a | 10.011 3±0.211 2a | 2.4±1.7d | ||
| 1)0~3表示地膜降解分级指标, 0表示未出现裂纹, 1表示开始出现裂纹, 2表示出现2~5 cm裂纹, 3表示出现大于5 cm裂纹。2)地膜宽1.2 m。3)同列不同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平上差异显著。1) 0-3 mean the levels of film degradation. 0 means no crack, 1 means the beginning of crack, 2 means that the crack reaches to 2-5 cm and 3 means that the crack is larger than 5 cm. 2) The film is 1.2 m wide. 3) Different small letters in the same column mean significant differences at 0.05 level. | ||||||||||||
下载: 导出CSV表2不同覆盖时间下不同氧化生物双降解地膜拉伸强度和断裂伸长率变化
Table2.Changes of tensile strength and elongation of different oxo-biodegradable plastic films at different mulching time
| 机械性能 Mechanical property | 处理 Treatment | 垄上Top of ridge | 垄侧Side of ridge | |||
| 铺膜前 Before mulching | 铺膜后90 d 90 days after mulching | 铺膜后120 d 120 days after mulching | 铺膜后120 d 120 days after mulching | |||
| 拉伸强度 Tensile strength (MPa) | 降解a Degradable film a | 29.66±1.53b | 22.06±1.50b | 20.64±0.85c | 12.17±0.85c | |
| 降解b Degradable film b | 30.81±0.58ab | 25.72±1.19a | 24.56±0.93b | 15.2±0.52b | ||
| 降解c Degradable film c | 29.12±1.24b | 26.28±1.71a | 23.57±0.73b | 15.84±0.50b | ||
| 普通地膜Common film | 32.16±0.56a | — | 31.49±0.85a | 30.38±0.48a | ||
| 断裂伸长率 Elongation (%) | 降解a Degradable film a | 385±5b | 370±9b | 345±13b | 109±17c | |
| 降解b Degradable film b | 414±8a | 400±9a | 358±11ab | 184±9b | ||
| 降解c Degradable film c | 400±13ab | 390±5a | 380±15a | 196±16b | ||
| 普通地膜Common film | 400±9ab | — | 380±9a | 380±10a | ||
| 同列不同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平上差异显著。Different lowercase letters in the same column mean significant differences at 0.05 level among different treatments. | ||||||
下载: 导出CSV表3不同氧化生物双降解地膜覆盖对玉米生育进程的影响(播种后天数, d)
Table3.Effects of different oxo-biodegradable plastic films mulching treatments on maize growth process (days after sowing, d)
| 处理 Treatment | 出苗期 Emerging | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽雄期 Heading | 灌浆期 Filling | 成熟期 Maturing |
| 降解a Degradable film a | 8 | 45 | 69 | 80 | 132 |
| 降解b Degradable film b | 8 | 45 | 68 | 79 | 130 |
| 降解c Degradable film c | 8 | 45 | 68 | 79 | 130 |
| 普通地膜Common film | 10 | 47 | 70 | 81 | 132 |
| 露地No mulching | 11 | 49 | 74 | 85 | 137 |
下载: 导出CSV表4不同氧化生物双降解地膜覆盖对玉米株高和叶面积指数的影响
Table4.Effects of different oxo-biodegradable plastic films mulching treatments on plant height and leaf area index of maize
| 指标 Index | 处理 Treatment | 苗期 Emerging | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽雄期 Heading | 灌浆成熟期 Filling and maturing |
| 株高 Plant height (cm) | 降解a Degradable film a | 50±0.5a | 126±5.8a | 281±2.0a | 280±4.5a |
| 降解b Degradable film b | 49±2.7a | 129±7.0a | 286±7.5a | 283±3.1a | |
| 降解c Degradable film c | 50±4.0a | 133±4.1a | 284±8.3a | 282±5.1a | |
| 普通地膜Common film | 44±1.0b | 120±0.3ab | 256±1.8b | 283±4.0a | |
| 露地No mulching | 41±2.7b | 110±10.1b | 246±2.3c | 275±4.5a | |
| 叶面积指数 LAI | 降解a Degradable film a | 0.309 8±0.042 8a | 1.812 2±0.062 7a | 4.619 3±0.024 8a | 4.100 9±0.192 1a |
| 降解b Degradable film b | 0.324 8±0.015 0a | 1.895 0±0.200 5a | 4.659 4±0.121 1a | 3.861 9±0.304 2a | |
| 降解c Degradable film c | 0.353 7±0.053 7a | 2.077 8±0.219 4a | 4.568 8±0.120 8a | 4.253 6±0.065 5a | |
| 普通地膜Common film | 0.213 4±0.016 5b | 1.469 5±0.006 6b | 4.636 2±0.416 9a | 4.565 7±0.648 5a | |
| 露地No mulching | 0.182 6±0.044 6b | 1.213 6±0.194 9b | 4.415 7±0.054 1a | 4.579 4±0.638 6a | |
| 同列不同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平上差异显著。Different lowercase letters in the same column mean significant differences at 0.05 level among different treatments. | |||||
下载: 导出CSV表5不同氧化生物双降解地膜覆盖对玉米产量及产量构成的影响
Table5.Effects of different oxo-biodegradable plastic films mulching treatments on maize yield and yield components
| 处理 Treatment | 穗长 Ear length (cm) | 穗粗 Ear diameter (cm) | 行数 Rows per ear | 行粒数 Kernels per row | 百粒重 100-kernel weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) |
| 降解a Degradable film a | 18.7±0.3a | 4.82±0.15a | 17.6±0.8a | 39.8±0.2a | 29.85±0.86a | 11 762.19±60.62a |
| 降解b Degradable film b | 18.4±0.1ab | 4.73±0.35b | 17.6±0.4a | 40.3±0.5a | 29.24±0.91a | 11 762.77±382.57a |
| 降解c Degradable film c | 18.5±0.2a | 4.73±0.25b | 17.6±0.2a | 39.7±0.3ab | 29.24±0.92a | 11 362.75±37.27a |
| 普通地膜 Common film | 18.1±0.2b | 4.61±0.20c | 17.4±0.2a | 38.6±0.4c | 28.87±0.88a | 11 648.22±247.12a |
| 露地 No mulching | 17.5±0.2c | 4.59±0.70c | 17.6±0.8a | 39.1±0.1bc | 27.37±0.33b | 10 293.92±283.15b |
| 同列不同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平上差异显著。Different lowercase letters in the same column mean significant differences at 0.05 level. | ||||||
下载: 导出CSV参考文献
| [1] | 陈志君, 张琳琳, 姜浩, 等.东北雨养区黑色地膜和种植密度对玉米田间地温和产量的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2017, 36(8):2169-2176 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201708010 CHEN Z J, ZHANG L L, JIANG H, et al. Effects of plastic film mulching and planting density on soil temperature and maize yield in rain-fed area of Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(8):2169-2176 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201708010 |
| [2] | 赵俊芳, 杨晓光, 刘志娟.气候变暖对东北三省春玉米严重低温冷害及种植布局的影响[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(12):6544-6551 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.12.029 ZHAO J F, YANG X G, LIU Z J. Influence of climate warming on serious low temperature and cold damage and cultivation pattern of spring maize in Northeast China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(12):6544-6551 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.12.029 |
| [3] | 申丽霞, 王璞, 张丽丽.可降解地膜的降解性能及对土壤温度、水分和玉米生长的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2012, 28(4):111-116 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.04.018 SHEN L X, WANG P, ZHANG L L. Degradation property of degradable film and its effect on soil temperature and moisture and maize growth[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012, 28(4):111-116 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.04.018 |
| [4] | TOUCHALEAUME F, MARTIN-CLOSAS L, ANGELLIER-COUSSY H, et al. Performance and environmental impact of biodegradable polymers as agricultural mulching films[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 144:433-439 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.006 |
| [5] | 严昌荣, 梅旭荣, 何文清, 等.农用地膜残留污染的现状与防治[J].农业工程学报, 2006, 22(11):269-272 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2006.11.055 YAN C R, MEI X R, HE W Q, et al. Present situation of residue pollution of mulching plastic film and controlling measures[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2006, 22(11):269-272 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2006.11.055 |
| [6] | ZHANG D, LIU H B, HU W L, et al. The status and distribution characteristics of residual mulching film in Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(11):2639-2646 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgnykx-e201611023 |
| [7] | 白丽婷, 海江波, 韩清芳, 等.不同地膜覆盖对渭北旱塬冬小麦生长及水分利用效率的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(4):135-139 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghdqnyyj201004025 BAI L T, HAI J B, HAN Q F, et al. Effects of mulching with different kinds of plastic film on growth and water use efficiency of winter wheat in Weibei Highland[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2010, 28(4):135-139 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghdqnyyj201004025 |
| [8] | 任艳云, 张龙平, 刘国伟, 等.不同生物降解地膜对大蒜生长发育的影响及降解效果研究[J].中国农学通报, 2018, 34(20):75-78 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNTB201820012.htm REN Y Y, ZHANG L P, LIU G W, et al. Influence of different biodegradable plastic film on garlic growth and the degradation effect[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(20):75-78 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNTB201820012.htm |
| [9] | 李强, 王琦, 张恩和, 等.生物可降解地膜覆盖对干旱灌区玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(9):155-159 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201609026 LI Q, WANG Q, ZHANG E H, et al. Effects of biodegradable film mulching on grain yields and water use efficiency of maize in arid oasis irrigation area[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(9):155-159 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghqzyyhj201609026 |
| [10] | 顾海蓉, 沈根祥, 黄丽华, 等.热塑淀粉Mater-Bi可生物降解地膜的适用性与降解性能研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(3):539-543 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2009.03.022 GU H R, SHEN G X, HUANG L H, et al. Biodegradability and applicability of thermoplastic starch biodegradable mulching film[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009, 28(3):539-543 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2009.03.022 |
| [11] | 张晓海, 陈建军, 杨志新. Biolice可降解地膜降解速率及其产物研究[J].云南农业大学学报, 2013, 28(4):540-544 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2013.04.016 ZHANG X H, CHEN J J, YANG Z X. Degradation rate and products of the Biolice biodegradable film[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2013, 28(4):540-544 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2013.04.016 |
| [12] | 谷晓博, 李援农, 银敏华, 等.降解膜覆盖对油菜根系、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].农业机械学报, 2015, 46(12):184-193 doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.025 GU X B, LI Y N, YIN M H, et al. Effects of biodegradable film mulching on root distribution, yield and water use efficiency of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.)[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(12):184-193 doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2015.12.025 |
| [13] | 邬强, 王振华, 郑旭荣, 等. PBAT生物降解膜覆盖对绿洲滴灌棉花土壤水热及产量的影响[J].农业工程学报, 2017, 33(16):135-143 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.16.018 WU Q, WANG Z H, ZHENG X R, et al. Effects of biodegradation film mulching on soil temperature, moisture and yield of cotton under drip irrigation in typical oasis area[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017, 33(16):135-143 doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.16.018 |
| [14] | 霍保安, 崔明奎, 赵国军, 等.氧化生物双降解生态地膜应用效果研究[J].中国农业信息, 2016, (4):88-90 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0423.2016.04.062 HUO B A, CUI M K, ZHAO G J, et al. Study on the application effect of oxo-biodegradable ecological film[J]. China Agricultural Information, 2016, (4):88-90 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0423.2016.04.062 |
| [15] | 刘蕊, 孙仕军, 张旺旺, 等.氧化生物双降解地膜覆盖对玉米田间水热及产量的影响[J].灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(12):25-30 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201712005 LIU R, SUN S J, ZHANG W W, et al. The effects of mulching with biodegradable plastic films on soil moisture and thermodynamics as well as maize yield[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2017, 36(12):25-30 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ggps201712005 |
| [16] | 袁海涛, 王丽红, 董灵艳, 等.氧化-生物双降解地膜降解性能及增温、保墒效果研究[J].中国农学通报, 2014, 30(23):166-170 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-1021 YUAN H T, WANG L H, DONG L Y, et al. Degradation performance and the effects on warming and moisture conservation of Oxo-biodegradable mulching film[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(23):166-170 doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-1021 |
| [17] | 杨惠娣, 唐赛珍.降解塑料试验评价方法探讨[J].塑料, 1996, 25(1):16-22 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600493963 YANG H D, TANG S Z. Evaluating method for testing of degradable plastics[J]. Plastics, 1996, 25(1):16-22 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600493963 |
| [18] | FARADILLA R H F, LEE G, ARNS J Y, et al. Characteristics of a free-standing film from banana pseudostem nanocellulose generated from TEMPO-mediated oxidation[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2017, 174:1156-1163 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.025 |
| [19] | 袁海涛, 于谦林, 贾德新, 等.氧化-生物双降解地膜降解性能及其对棉花生长的影响[J].棉花学报, 2016, 28(6):602-608 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mhxb201606010 YUAN H T, YU Q L, JIA D X, et al. Degradation performance of oxo-biodegradable plastic films and their effects on cotton growth[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(6):602-608 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/mhxb201606010 |
| [20] | 刘群, 穆兴民, 袁子成, 等.生物降解地膜自然降解过程及其对玉米生长发育和产量的影响[J].水土保持通报, 2011, 31(6):126-129 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201104102654 LIU Q, MU X M, YUAN Z C, et al. Degradation of biodegradable mulch film and its effect on growth and yield of maize[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 31(6):126-129 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201104102654 |
| [21] | 胡广荣, 王琦, 宋兴阳, 等.沟覆盖材料对垄沟集雨种植土壤温度、作物产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(5):590-599 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2016505&flag=1 HU G R, WANG Q, SONG X Y, et al. Effects of furrow-mulching materials on soil temperature, crop yield and water use efficiency in ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2016, 24(5):590-599 http://www.ecoagri.ac.cn/zgstny/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=2016505&flag=1 |
