生态环境部华南环境科学研究所(生态环境部生态环境应急研究所),广州 510530
South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment(Research Institute of Eco-environmental Emergency, Ministry of Ecology and Environment), Guangzhou 510530, China
水源水体富营养化及造成的藻类水华是淡水生态系统面临的主要问题之一,严重威胁城市供水。以华南地区赤水水库为例,基于2019年5月暴发的蓝藻水华事件,开展了水库水质、蓝藻密度的监测分析及壳聚糖改性高岭土复合聚合氯化铝的应急除藻技术研究,确定了絮凝剂的最佳投加量并评估了除藻效果。结果表明: 水华暴发时取水口表层TN、TP浓度超过地表水III标准且水体主要限制性元素为磷,若集水区内磷的浓度继续增大,则水华暴发的频率继续增加;此次蓝藻水华的优势种为铜绿微囊藻,且垂向主要聚集在表层及水下5 m处,随水深的增加藻细胞密度逐渐降低,表层藻细胞密度高达6.87×10
时,1 h去除率约60%,且随着时间延长,去除率持续提高。改性黏土复合聚合氯化铝能在短期内使藻类沉降至水库底部,可应用于湖库型饮用水源蓝藻水华的应急处置。
One of the major problems in freshwater ecosystem that threaten urban water supply is eutrophication and algal blooms that caused by it. In this paper, cyanobacterial bloom happened in May 2019 in Chishui reservoir, a drinking water reservoir in south China, was taken as a typical case to study variation of water quality and cyanobacterial cell density, as well as the emergency treatment technology. During this cyanobacterial bloom case, an in-field experiment of emergency treatment by adding chitosan-modified-kaolin and polyaluminum chloride (PAC) was carried on to assess the treatment efficiency and the optimal dosage. Results showed that total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations in the surface layer exceeded level III of the national water quality standard, and eutrophication in the reservoir was controlled by phosphorus concentration. If the phosphorus concentration kept increasing, so as the frequency of cyanobacterial bloom. Microcystis aeruginosa was found to be the dominant species in this case, and the M. aeruginosa cells were mainly distributed within 5m below the water surface. The cell density in the surface was highest and reached 6.87×10
and it decreased with increase in water depth. The efficiency of chlorophyll a removal by adding chitosan-modified-kaolin and PAC was satisfactory. The removal rate was up to 60% after adding 50 mg·L
PAC in one hour, which increased with the extension of time afterwards. Algal cells can be precipitated into the bottom area of the reservoir in a short period of time by addition of chitosan-modified-kaolin and PAC. As such, this technology is suitable for emergency treatment of cyanobacterial bloom in drinking water reservoir.
.
Dominant species of phytoplankton during the bloom
Spatial distribution of the phytoplankton cell densities and chlorophyll a with water depth
改性黏土与不同梯度聚合氯化铝组合联用对水华水体中叶绿素a的去除效果
Removal effect of chlorophyll a in bloom water by the modified clay combined with polyaluminum chloride of different gradient
改性黏土与不同梯度聚合氯化铝组合联用对水华水体中叶绿素a的去除效果
Removal effect of chlorophyll a in bloom water by the modified clay combined with polyaluminum chloride of different gradients
改性黏土与不同梯度聚合氯化铝组合联用对水华水体中叶绿素a的去除效果
Removal effect of chlorophyll a in bloom water by the modified clay combined with polyaluminum chloride of different gradient
[1] | 徐春燕, 杨洁, 马明睿, 等. 淀山湖水华高发期浮游藻类群落变化特征研究[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(4): 1136-1143. |
[2] | 李庚. 城区内小型湖泊养殖鲢、鳙鱼抑制水体“水华”措施探讨[J]. 科学养鱼, 2017(4): 22-23. |
[3] | 姚玲爱, 赵学敏, 周广杰, 等. 广东省高州水库春季蓝藻水华成因初步探讨[J]. 湖泊科学, 2011, 23(4): 534-540. doi: 10.18307/2011.0407 |
[4] | 罗欢, 陈华香, 陈文龙, 等. 水库蓝藻生态治理措施及效果评估[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(4): 51-55. |
[5] | 苟婷, 马千里, 王振兴, 等. 龟石水库夏季富营养化状况与蓝藻水华暴发特征[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(10): 4141-4150. |
[6] | 王彤, 张玲, 李英杰, 等. 陕西瀛湖富营养化特征与控制对策[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2017, 38(5): 29-34. |
[7] | 李峰, 秦红超, 龙汉武, 等. 红枫湖蓝藻水华的成因及其控制对策[J]. 贵州科学, 2017, 35(3): 11-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6563.2017.03.003 |
[8] | 韩博平. 中国水库生态学研究的回顾与展望[J]. 湖泊科学, 2010, 22(2): 151-160. |
[9] | üVEGES V. TAPOLCZAI K, KRIENITZ L, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics and physiological plasticity of an Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, (Cyanobacteria, Nostocaceae) winter bloom in a deep oligo-mesotrophic lake (Lake stechlin, Germany)[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2012, 698: 263-272. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1103-3 |
[10] | OLIVER R L, HAMILTON D P, BROOKES J D, et al. Physiology, blooms and prediction of planktonic cyanobacteria[M]//In WHITTON, BA. Ecology of Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Time and Space. Publishers’ Graphics LLC, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2012: 155-194. |
[11] | 陈贺林, 叶碧碧, 吴越, 等. 超声波对滇池蓝藻伪空胞和群体沉降性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2020, 14(1): 43-51. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201903080 |
[12] | RAJASEKHAR P, FAN L H, NGUYEN T, et al. A review of the use of sonication to control cyanobacterial blooms[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(14): 4319-4329. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.054 |
[13] | CHEN S L, ZHENG T F, YE C L, et al. Algicidal properties of extracts from Cinnamomum camphora fresh leaves and their main compounds[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 163: 594-603. |
[14] | TRIEST L, STIERS I, VAN O S. Biomanipulation as a nature-based solution to reduce cyanobacterial blooms[J]. Aquatic Ecology, 2016, 50(3): 461-483. doi: 10.1007/s10452-015-9548-x |
[15] | SONG Y, ZHANG L L, LI J, et al. Mechanism of the influence of hydrodynamics on Microcystis aeruginosa, a dominant bloom species in reservoirs[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 636: 230-239. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.257 |
[16] | NOYMA N P, DE MAGALH?ES L, FURTADO L L, et al. Controlling cyanobacterial blooms through effective flocculation and sedimentation with combined use of flocculants and phosphorus adsorbing natural soil and modified clay[J]. Water Research, 2016, 97: 26-38. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.057 |
[17] | PAN G, DAI L C, LI L, et al. Reducing the recruitment of sedimented algae and nutrient release into the overlying water using modified soil/sand flocculation-capping in eutrophic lakes[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2012, 46(9): 5077-5084. doi: 10.1021/es3000307 |
[18] | ZOU H, PAN G, CHEN H, et al. Removal of cyanobacterial blooms in Taihu Lake using local soils. II. Effective removal of Microcystis aeruginosa using local soils and sediments modified by chitosan[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 141(2): 201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.042 |
[19] | RENAULT F, SANCEY B, BADOT P M, et al. Chitosan for coagulation/flocculation processes: An eco-friendly approach[J]. European Polymer Journal, 2009, 45(5): 1337-1348. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.027 |
[20] | JIANG J Q, KIM C. Comparison of algal removal by coagulation with clays and Al-based coagulants[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 2008, 43(7): 1677-1686. doi: 10.1080/01496390801973615 |
[21] | 周庆, 杨小杰, 韩士群. PAC改性粘土处理蓝藻水华对水环境的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2017, 29(2): 343-350. doi: 10.18307/2017.0210 |
[22] | 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2002. |
[23] | 胡鸿钧, 魏印心. 中国淡水藻类: 系统、分类及生态[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006. |
[24] | PAERL H W, OTTEN T G. Harmful cyanobacterial blooms: causes, consequences, and controls[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2013, 65: 995-1010. |
[25] | JIANG C, ZHU L, HU X, et al. Reasons and control of eutrophication in new reservoirs[M]//Eutrophication: Causes, consequences and control. Dordrecht: Springer, 2010: 325-340. |
[26] | GIBSON G, CARLSON R, SIMPSON J, et al. Nutrient criteria, technical guidance manual: Lakes and reservoirs[S]. Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2000. EPA-822-B00-001. |
[27] | SMITH V H. Responses of estuarine and coastal marine phytoplankton to nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2006, 51(1): 377-384. |
[28] | 许海, 朱广伟, 秦伯强, 等. 氮磷比对水华蓝藻优势形成的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011, 31(10): 1676-1683. |
[29] | 朱伟, 万蕾, 赵联芳. 不同温度和营养盐质量浓度条件下藻类的种间竞争规律[J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(1): 6-11. |
[30] | MARCé R, MORENO-OSTOS E, GARCíA-BARCINA J M, et al. Tailoring dam structures to water quality predictions in new reservoir projects: Assisting decision-making using numerical modeling[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(6): 1255-1267. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.01.014 |
[31] | WAGNER C, ADRIAN R. Consequences of changes in thermal regime for plankton diversity and trait composition in a polymictic lake: A matter of temporal scale[J]. Freshwater Biology, 2011, 56(10): 1949-1961. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02623.x |
[32] | 刘春光, 金相灿, 孙凌等. pH值对淡水藻类生长和种类变化的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2005, 24(2): 294-298. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2005.02.019 |
[33] | 成晓奕, 李慧赟, 戴淑君. 天目湖沙河水库溶解氧分层的季节变化及其对水环境影响的模拟[J]. 湖泊科学, 2013, 25(6): 818-826. doi: 10.18307/2013.0605 |
[34] | 吴阿娜, 朱梦杰, 汤琳, 等. 淀山湖蓝藻水华高发期叶绿素a动态及相关环境因子分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2011, 23(1): 67-72. doi: 10.18307/2011.0111 |
[35] | SERIZAWA H, AMEMIYA T, ROSSBERG A G, et al. Computer simulations of seasonal outbreak and diurnal vertical migration of cyanobacteria[J]. Limnology, 2008, 9(3): 185-194. doi: 10.1007/s10201-008-0245-5 |
[36] | PAERL H W, HUISMAN J. Blooms like it hot[J]. Science, 2008, 320(5872): 57. doi: 10.1126/science.1155398 |
[37] | 张艳晴, 杨桂军, 秦伯强, 等. 光照强度对水华微囊藻(Microcystis flos-aquae)群体大小增长的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2014, 26(4): 559-566. doi: 10.18307/2014.0410 |
[38] | 于海燕, 周斌, 胡尊英, 等. 生物监测中叶绿素a浓度与藻类密度的关联性研究[J]. 中国环境监测, 2009, 25(6): 40-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6002.2009.06.012 |
[39] | 靳晓光, 张洪刚, 潘纲. 阳离子化壳聚糖改性黏土絮凝去除藻华[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(9): 2437-2445. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201803110 |
[40] | 卢艳秋, 严群, 刘馥雯, 等. 壳聚糖改性蛭石絮凝除藻效果研究[J]. 江西理工大学学报, 2017, 38(3): 50-55. |
[41] | 陈思莉, 邴永鑫, 常莎, 等. 除藻剂应急治理湖水蓝藻水华案例分析[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2019(3): 20-23. |
[42] | 张木兰, 潘纲, 陈灏, 等. 改性沉积物除藻对水质改善的效果研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2007, 27(1): 13-17. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2007.01.003 |
[43] | ZOU H, PAN G, CHEN H. Removal of cyanobacterial blooms in Taihu Lake using loca1. II. Effective removal of Microcystis aeruginosa using local soils and sediments modified by chitosan[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 141(2): 201-205. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.042 |