2.重庆大学,三峡库区环境与生态部重点实验室,重庆 400045
1.School of Urban Construction and Environmental Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
2.Key Laboratory of Three Gorges Reservoir Region’s Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
为探查不同电子受体产电性能及对阳极微生物群落的影响,研究了3种电子受体(铁氰化钾、曝气阴极、过硫酸钾),构建了双室榨菜废水微生物燃料电池系统(microbial fuel cells,MFCs),实现了污水处理和能量回收的双重目的,探讨了不同电子受体(铁氰化钾、曝气阴极、过硫酸钾)对榨菜废水MFCs产电性能及阳极微生物群落的影响。结果表明:在产电性能方面,当过硫酸钾作为阴极电子受体时,电池输出电压、库仑效率、功率密度均优于另外2种常用阴极电子受体(铁氰化钾和氧气);在500 Ω的外接电阻间歇运行的条件下,其输出电压、库仑效率、功率密度分别为802 mV、(33±1.6)%、697 mW·m
。阳极生物16S rRNA基因测序分析表明,水解发酵菌为榨菜废水微生物燃料电池阳极核心菌群,铁氰化钾、氧气和过硫酸钾MFCs阳极微生物菌群相对丰度分别为64.3%、63.6%和75.51%,包括
菌属。阴极电子受体不同的MFCs的阳极微生物群落核心菌群类似,但是丰度有所不同。势差较大的电子受体(过硫酸钾)微生物群落多样性和丰富度较高,产电和污染物去除效果较好。
In order to explore the relationship between the electrical properties of different electron acceptors and the anodic microbial community, three electron acceptors (potassium ferricyanide, aerated cathode, potassium persulfate) were experimentally studied. The microbial fuel cells (MFCs) of double-chamber mustard wastewater were constructed to achieve the dual purpose of sewage treatment and energy recovery. Effects of different electron acceptors (potassium ferricyanide, aerated cathode and potassium persulfate) on their electricity production performance and anode microbial community in mustard tuber wastewater were investigated. Results show that when potassium persulfate was used as the cathode electron acceptor, electricity production performance, such as the battery output voltage, coulombic efficiency and power density, was better than the other two common cathode electron acceptors (potassium ferricyanide and oxygen). Under the intermittent operation conditions with 500 Ω external resistors, the output voltage, coulombic efficiency, and power density were 802 mV, (33±1.6)% and 697 mW·m
, respectively. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis of the anode organism showed that the hydrolysis fermentation bacteria were the anode core bacteria of MFC treating mustard tuber wastewater, which accounted for 64.3%, 63.6%and 75.51% in the microbial flora of potassium ferricyanide, oxygen and potassium persulfate MFCs, respectively, and included
. MFCs with different cathode electron acceptors had similar core bacteria of anode microflora, but had different abundance. The electron acceptor (potassium persulfate) with large potential difference caused higher diversity and richness of microbial community, and had better performance on electricity generation and pollutant removal than other electron acceptors.
.
Schematic diagram of MFCs
Voltage output of MFCs with different cathode electron acceptors
Power density and polarization curve of MFCs with different cathode electron acceptors
不同阴极电子受体下的进水、出水的COD及去除率和不同电子受体的库仑效率
COD of influent and effluent and its removal rate in MFCs with different cathode electron acceptors andthe coulombic efficiencies of different electron acceptors
不同阴极电子受体的阳极生物膜稀释曲线和Shannon指数曲线
Anodic biofilm dilution curve and Shannon index curve of MFCs with different cathode electron acceptors
Microbial community structure in anode biofilm with different electron acceptors at phylum level
Microbial community structure in anode biofilm with different electron acceptors at genes level
[1] | ZHAO Y, PARK H D, PARK J H, et al. Effect of different salinity adaptation on the performance and microbial community in a sequencing batch reactor[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 216: 808-816. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.032 |
[2] | CHAI H X, KANG W. Influence of biofilm density on anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor treating mustard tuber wastewater[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2012, 168(6): 1664-1671. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9887-1 |
[3] | 吴义诚, 王泽杰, 刘利丹, 等. 利用光微生物燃料电池实现养猪废水资源化利用研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(2): 456-460. |
[4] | 刘斌, 尚均顶, 王许云. 微生物燃料电池构型研究进展[J]. 当代化工, 2018, 47(10): 2173-2177. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0460.2018.10.047 |
[5] | 周亚, 彭新红, 阮国岭, 等. 微生物燃料电池阳极材料修饰研究进展[J]. 水处理技术, 2017, 43(3): 9-13. |
[6] | 冯雅丽, 于莲, 李浩然, 等. 微生物燃料电池降解焦化废水过程研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38(11): 4099-4105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2018.11.014 |
[7] | 谢淼, 徐龙君, 程李钰. 处理过的老龄垃圾渗滤液为阴极液的微生物燃料电池性能研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(9): 2641-2647. |
[8] | 程鹏, 袁浩然, 邓丽芳, 等. 基于广州市政垃圾渗滤液的MFC性能及阳极微生物分析[J]. 新能源进展, 2018, 6(5): 371-378. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-560X.2018.05.006 |
[9] | 倪红军, 卓露, 吕帅帅, 等. 运行因素对猪场废水微生物燃料电池产电性能的影响[J]. 现代化工, 2018, 38(11): 136-139. |
[10] | 蒋沁芮, 李泽华, 杨暖, 等. 三维电极微生物燃料电池处理生活污水同步产电性能[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(4): 873-878. |
[11] | 付国楷, 吴越, 张林防, 等. 微生物燃料电池在高盐榨菜废水处理中的产电性能[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(4): 348-352. |
[12] | GUO F, FU G K, ZHANG Z, et al. Mustard tuber wastewater treatment and simultaneous electricity generation using microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 136: 425-430. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.116 |
[13] | 付国楷, 张林防, 郭飞, 等. 榨菜废水MFC多周期运行产电性能及COD降解[J]. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(4): 1401-1407. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2017.04.026 |
[14] | ZHANG L F, FU G K, ZHANG Z. Electricity generation and microbial community in long-running microbial fuel cell for high-salinity mustard tuber wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Electrochemistry, 2019, 126: 20-28. |
[15] | ZHANG L F, FU G K, ZHANG Z. Simultaneous nutrient and carbon removal and electricity generation in self-buffered biocathode microbial fuel cell for high-salinity mustard tuber wastewater treatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 272: 105-113. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.012 |
[16] | 刘远峰, 孙伟, 宫磊. 电子受体对微生物燃料电池产电性能的影响[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2016, 38(11): 84-89. |
[17] | JADHAVA D A, GHADGE A N, DEBIKA M, et al. Comparison of oxygen and hypochlorite as cathodic electron acceptor in microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 154: 330-335. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.069 |
[18] | GHADGE A N, JADHAV D A, PRADHAN H, et al. Enhancing waste activated sludge digestion and power production using hypochlorite as catholyte in clayware microbial fuel cell[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 182: 225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.004 |
[19] | JUN L, QIAN F, QIANG L, et al. Persulfate a self-activated cathodic electron acceptor for microbial fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 194: 269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.055 |
[20] | MIYAHARA M, KOUZUMA A, WATANABE K. Effects of NaCl concentration on anode microbes in microbial fuel cells[J]. AMB Express, 2015, 5(1): 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s13568-014-0092-1 |
[21] | 吴越. 微生物燃料电池处理榨菜废水及甜菜碱影响研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2016. |
[22] | 杨瑞丽, 王晓君, 吴俊斌, 等. 厌氧氨氧化工艺快速启动策略及其微生物特性[J]. 环境工程学报, 2018, 12(12): 3341-3350. |
[23] | DING A, ZHAN D, DING F, et al. Effect of inocula on performance of bio-cathode denitrification and its microbial mechanism[J]. Chemical Engineering, 2018, 343: 399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.119 |
[24] | WU Y, HAN R, YANG X, et al. Correlating microbial community with physicochemical indices and structures of a full-scale integrated constructed wetland system[J]. Applied Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2016, 100(15): 6917-6926. |
[25] | 陆玉, 钟慧, 丑三涛, 等. 乙酸驯化对厌氧污泥微生物群落结构及发酵特性的影响[J]. 环境科学学报, 2018, 38(5): 1835-1842. |
[26] | RóZSENBERSZKI T, KOóK L, HUTVáGNER D, et al. Comparison of anaerobic degradation processes for bioenergy generation from liquid fraction of pressed solid waste[J]. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2015, 6(4): 465-473. doi: 10.1007/s12649-015-9379-y |
[27] | DHIMAN S S, SHRESTHA N, DAVID A, et al. Producing methane, methanol and electricity from organic waste of fermentation reaction using novel microbes[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 258: 270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.128 |
[28] | ZHEN G, KOBAYASHI T, LU X, et al. Biomethane recovery from egeria densa in a microbial electrolysis cell-assisted anaerobic system: Performance and stability assessment[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 149: 121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.101 |
[29] | RóZSENBERSZKI T, KOóK L, BAKONYI P, et al. Municipal waste liquor treatment via bioelectrochemical and fermentation (H2+CH4) processes: Assessment of various technological sequences[J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 171: 692-701. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.114 |
[30] | ROSENBAUM M A, BAR HY, BEG Q K, et al. Transcriptional analysis of shewanella oneidensis Mr-1 with an electrode compared to Fe (Ⅲ) citrate or oxygen as terminal electron acceptor[J]. Plos One, 2012, 7(2): 1-13. |
[31] | PENG L, YOU S, WANG J. Electrode potential regulates cytochrome accumulation on Shewanella oneidensis cell surface and the consequence to bioelectrocatalytic current generation[J]. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2010, 25(11): 2530-2533. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.03.039 |
[32] | BUSALMEN J P, ESTEVE N A, FELIU J M. Whole cell electrochemistry of electricity-producing microorganisms evidence an adaptation for optimal exocellular electron transport[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(7): 2445-2450. |
[33] | TERAVEST M A, ANGENENT L T. Oxidizing electrode potentials decrease current production and coulombic efficiency through cytochrome c inactivation in Shewanella oneidensis Mr-1[J]. Chemelectrochem, 2014, 1(11): 2000-2006. doi: 10.1002/celc.v1.11 |
[34] | GROBBLER C, VIRDIS B, NOUWENS A, et al. Effect of the anode potential on the physiology and proteome of Shewanella oneidensis Mr-1[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2018, 201: 172-179. |
[35] | CARMONA M, HARNISCH F, KUHLICKE U, et al. Electron transfer and biofilm formation of Shewanella putrefaciens as function of anode potential[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2013, 93: 23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2012.05.002 |
[36] | SUN L, TOYONAGA M, OHASHI A, et al. Lentimicrobium saccharophilum gen. nov., sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium representing a new family in the phylum Bacteroidetes, and proposal of Lentimicrobiaceae fam. Nov[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2016, 66: 2635-2642. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001103 |
[37] | RAGO L, ZECCHIN S, MARZORATI S, et al. A study of microbial communities on terracotta separator and on biocathode of air breathing microbial fuel cells[J]. Bioelectrochemistry, 2018, 120: 18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.11.005 |
[38] | 周蕾. 厌氧烃降解产甲烷菌系的组成及其代谢产物的特征[D]. 上海: 华东理工大学, 2012. |
[39] | XIA Y, WANG Y, WANG Y, et al. Cellular adhesiveness and cellulolytic capacity in Anaerolineae revealed by omics-based genome interpretation[J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2016, 9(1): 111. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0524-z |
[40] | LIANG B, WANG L Y, MBADINGA S M, et al. Anaerolineaceae and Methanosaeta turne to be the dominant microorganisms in alkanes-dependent methanogenic culture after long-term of incubation[J]. AMB Express, 2015, 5: 37. doi: 10.1186/s13568-015-0117-4 |
[41] | LIU Y, LAI Q, DU J, et al. Thioclava indica sp. nov., isolated from surface seawater of the Indian Ocean[J]. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2015, 107(1): 297-304. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0320-3 |
[42] | DU Z J, WANG Y, DUNlAP C, et al. Draconibacterium orientale gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from two distinct marine environments, and proposal of Draconibacteriaceae fam. nov[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2014, 64: 1690-1696. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.056812-0 |
[43] | CHENG C, ZHOU Z, QIU Z, et al. Enhancement of sludge reduction by ultrasonic pretreatment and packing carriers in the anaerobic side-stream reactor: Performance, sludge characteristics and microbial community structure[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 249: 298-306. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.043 |
[44] | TROSHINA O, VIKTORIA O, NZTALIA S, et al. Sphaerochaeta associata sp. nov., a spherical spirochaete isolated from cultures of Methanosarcina mazei JL01[J]. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2015, 65: 4315-4322. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000575 |
[45] | LOGAN B E. Essential data and techniques for conducting microbial fuel cell and other types of bioelectrochemical system experiments[J]. Chemsuschem, 2012, 5(6): 988-994. doi: 10.1002/cssc.v5.6 |
[46] | DAI X, HU C, ZHANG D, et al. Impact of a high ammonia-ammonium-pH system on methane-producing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in mesophilic anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 245: 598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.208 |