删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

生成认知:理论基础与实践走向

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

叶浩生, 曾红(), 杨文登()
广州大学心理与脑科学研究中心, 广州 510006
收稿日期:2019-02-12出版日期:2019-11-25发布日期:2019-09-24
通讯作者:曾红,杨文登E-mail:zhh0791@163.com;yangwendeng@163.com

基金资助:* 广东省基础研究与应用研究重大项目(2016WZDXM022)

Enactive cognition: Theoretical rationale and practical approach

YE Haosheng, ZENG Hong(), YANG Wendeng()
Center for Mind and Brain Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Received:2019-02-12Online:2019-11-25Published:2019-09-24
Contact:ZENG Hong,YANG Wendeng E-mail:zhh0791@163.com;yangwendeng@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 生成认知是具身认知思潮中的一个新取向。它主张认知是通过身体活动“生成的” (enacted)。认知的起点不是一个怎样精确表征世界的信息加工问题, 而是行动者在情境中怎样利用知觉来指导自己的行动。认知不是通过精确的心理表征“恢复”世界, 而是通过知觉引导的行动“生成”或“造就”一个自己的世界。认知是具身的行动, 认知结构形成于经常和反复出现的感觉运动模式, 与身体构造和身体活动具有深刻连续性。梅洛·庞蒂的身体现象学对生成认知具有深刻影响。同时, 詹姆斯、杜威等人的实用主义哲学对于实践行动的强调也深刻影响了生成认知。这种认知观强调了“行动”对心智的意义, 引发许多争议, 也促进了心理学研究范式的转变。


[1] Allen, M., Adams, F. (2010). Embodied cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 619-628.
[2] Allen, M., & Friston, K. J . (2018). From cognitivism to autopoiesis: Towards a computational framework for the embodied mind. Synthese, 195(6), 2459-2482.
[3] Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C. C., Saunders, F. A., White, B., & Scadden, L . (1969) Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature, 221, 963-964.
[4] Barrett, L. (2019). Enactivism, pragmatism…behaviorism?. Philosophical Studies, 176 (3), 807-818.
[5] Bechtold, L., Bellebaum, C., Egan, S., Tettamanti, M., & Ghio, M . (2019). The role of experience for abstract concepts: Expertise modulates the electrophysiological correlates of mathematical word processing. Brain and Language, 188, 1-10.
[6] Begg, A. (1999). Enactivism and mathematics education. Merga, 22, 68-75.
[7] Bryon, E., Bishop, J. M., McCloughlin, D., & Kaufman, J . ( Eds.). (2019). Embodied cognition, acting and performance. Taylor & Francis.
[8] Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351-367.
[9] Chemero, A. (2013). Radical embodied cognitive science. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 145-150.
[10] Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3 (4), 357-370.
[11] Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
[12] di, Paolo , E. (2018). The enactive conception of life. The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, 71-94.
[13] Dominey, P. F., Prescott, T. J., Bohg, J., Engel, A. K., Gallagher, S., Heed, T. , .. Schwartz, A.(2016) . Implications of action-oriented paradigm shifts in cognitive science. In Engel, A. K., Friston, K. J., & Kragic, D. (Eds.). The pragmatic turn: Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science (Vol. 18). MIT Press.
[14] Engel, A. K., Friston, K. J. , & Kragic, D. (Eds.).(2016) . The pragmatic turn: Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science (Vol 18) MIT Press Toward action-oriented views in cognitive science (Vol. 18). MIT Press.
[15] Engel, A. K., Maye, A., Kurthen, M., & K?nig, P . (2013). Where's the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17 (5), 202-209.
[16] Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press.
[17] Gallagher, S. (2019). Precis: Enactivist Interventions. Philosophical Studies, 176 (3), 803-806.
[18] Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G . (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119 (2), 593-609.
[19] Glenberg, A., M . (2015). Few believe the world Is flat: How embodiment Is changing the scientific understanding of cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(2), 165-171.
[20] Held, R., & Hein, A. (1963). Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56(5), 872-876.
[21] Hoffmann, M., & Pfeifer, R. (2018). Robots as powerful allies for the study of embodied cognition from the bottom up. The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, 19.
[22] Hutto, D. D . (2015). REC: revolution effected by clarification. Topoi, 36(3), 377-391.
[23] Hutto, D. D.& Myin, E.. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts Basic minds without content. The MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[24] Hutto, D. D.& Myin, E.. (2017). Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts Basic minds meet content. MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[25] Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. University of Chicago Press.
[26] Jurgens, A., & Kirchhoff, M. D . (2019). Enactive social cognition: Diachronic constitution & coupled anticipation. Consciousness and Cognition, 70(1), 1-10.
[27] Kiefer, M., & Barsalou, L. W.. (2013). Grounding the human conceptual system in perception, action, and internal states. In W. Prinz., M. Beisert., & A. Herwig (Eds). Action science:Foundations of an emerging discipline. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[28] Kiverstein, J. (2018). Extended cognition. The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, 19-40.
[29] K?nig, P., Melnik, A., Goeke, C., Gert, A. L., K?nig, S. U., & Kietzmann, T. C . (2018). Embodied cognition. International Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (pp.1-4).
[30] Lebon, F., Ruffino, C., Greenhouse, I., Labruna, L., Ivry, R. B., & Papaxanthis, C . (2018). The neural specificity of movement preparation during actual and imagined movements. Cerebral Cortex, 29(2), 689-700.
[31] Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E . (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174-187.
[32] Lobo, L., Travieso, D., Jacobs, D. M., Rodger, M., & Craig, C. M . (2018). Sensory substitution: Using a vibrotactile device to orient and walk to targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(1), 108-124.
[33] L?hr, G. (2019). Embodied cognition and abstract concepts: Do concept empiricists leave anything out?. Philosophical Psychology, 32(2), 161-185.
[34] Lozada, M., & Carro, N. (2016). Embodied action improves cognition in children: Evidence from a study based on Piagetian conservation tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 393.
[35] Maiese, M. (2018). Can the mind be embodied, enactive, affective, and extended? Phenomenology & the Cognitive Sciences, 17(2),343-361.
[36] Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J . (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA: Shambhala
[37] McGann, M., de Jaegher, H., & di Paolo, E . (2013). Enaction and psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 203-209.
[38] Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/2011). Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge Press.
[39] Pfeifer, R., Iida, F., & Lungarella, M . (2014). Cognition from the bottom up: on biological inspiration, body morphology, and soft materials. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(8), 404-413.
[40] Reid, D. A., & Mgombelo, J. (2015). Survey of key concepts in enactivist theory and methodology. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 171-183.
[41] Ruggiero, M., & Catmur, C. (2018). Mirror neurons and intention understanding: Dissociating the contribution of object type and intention to mirror responses using electromyography. Psychophysiology, 55(7), e13061.
[42] Silverman, D. (2013). Sensorimotor enactivism and temporal experience. Adaptive Behavior, 21(3), 151-158.
[43] Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). Fluid movement and creativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(4), 625-629.
[44] Slepian, M. L., Weisbuch, M., Pauker, K., Bastian, B., & Ambady, N . (2014). Fluid movement and fluid social cognition: Bodily movement influences essentialist thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(1), 111-120.
[45] Soto-Andrade J. (2018). Enactive Metaphorising in the Learning of Mathematics. In Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 619-637). Springer, Cham.
[46] Stefanics, G., Heinzle, J., Horváth, A. A., & Stephan, K. E . (2018). Visual mismatch and predictive coding: A computational single-trial ERP study. Journal of Neuroscience, 38(16), 4020-4030.
[47] Stewart, J. (2019). Afterword: a view from enaction. Language Sciences, 71, 68-73.
[48] Su, D. Q., Zhong, Y., Zeng, H., & Ye, H. S . (2013). Embodied semantic processing of Chinese action idioms: Evidence from fMRI study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(11), 1187-1199.
[49] [ 苏得权, 钟元, 曾红, 叶浩生 . (2013). 汉语动作成语语义理解激活脑区及其具身效应: 来自fMRI的证据. 心理学报,45(11), 1187-1199.]
[50] Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor subjectivity and the enactive approach to experience. Phenomenology & the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 407-427.
[51] Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991/2010). The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. Translated by Li, H.W. et al. HangZhou: Zhejiang University Press.
[52] [ F.瓦雷拉 , E.汤普森, E.罗施 . (1991/2010). 具身心智: 认知科学和人类经验. 李恒威等译. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.]
[53] Ward, D., Silverman, D., & Villalobos, M . (2017). Introduction: The varieties of enactivism. Topoi, 36(3), 365-375.
[54] Wu, J. F . (2015). The philosophical study of cognitive enactivism (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Shanxi University, Tai Yuan.
[55] [ 武建峰 . (2015). 认知生成主义的哲学研究. 山西大学博士学位论文, 太原].




[1]苏佳佳, 叶浩生. 中国神话中的具身心理学思想探索[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(3): 386-398.
[2]王汉林, 蒋泽亮, 冯晓慧, 鲁忠义. 道德概念的空间形象性:语言因素和具身因素的共同作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(2): 128-138.
[3]黎晓丹, 丁道群, 叶浩生. 身体姿势启动的内隐权力感对公平决策的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2019, 51(1): 106-116.
[4]宋晓蕾, 李洋洋, 杨倩, 游旭群. 反应手的不同状态对联合任务中观察学习的影响 *[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(9): 975-984.
[5]易仲怡, 杨文登, 叶浩生. 具身认知视角下软硬触觉经验对性别角色认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(7): 793-802.
[6]叶浩生, 麻彦坤, 杨文登. 身体与认知表征:见解与分歧[J]. 心理学报, 2018, 50(4): 462-472.
[7]黎晓丹; 杜建政; 叶浩生. 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应:蜷缩的身体使人更卑微[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(6): 746-756.
[8]刘文娟;沈曼琼;李莹;王瑞明. 情绪概念加工与情绪面孔知觉的相互影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(2): 163-173.
[9]苏得权;曾红;陈骐; 叶浩生. 用药动作线索诱发海洛因戒断者的镜像神经活动:一项fMRI研究[J]. 心理学报, 2016, 48(12): 1499-1506.
[10]刘思耘;周宗奎;李娜. 网络使用经验对动作动词加工的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(8): 992-1003.
[11]杨惠兰;何先友;赵雪汝;张维. 权力的概念隐喻表征:来自大小与颜色隐喻的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(7): 939-949.
[12]黎晓丹;叶浩生. 中国古代儒道思想中的具身认知观[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(5): 702-710.
[13]唐佩佩;叶浩生;杜建政. 权力概念与空间大小:具身隐喻的视角[J]. 心理学报, 2015, 47(4): 514-521.
[14]叶浩生. “具身”涵义的理论辨析[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(7): 1032-1042.
[15]李惠娟;张积家;张瑞芯. 上下意象图式对羌族亲属词认知的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(4): 481-491.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4560
相关话题/心理 经验 哲学 空间 学报