删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

情绪效价、唤醒度和有无评价影响手部动作

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

唐日新(), 李佳佳, 王志鹏
南京大学社会学院心理学系, 南京 210023
收稿日期:2018-06-04出版日期:2019-08-25发布日期:2019-06-24
通讯作者:唐日新E-mail:trxtrx518@nju.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金面上项目资助(31571131)

Valence, arousal and appraisal of emotion influence the hand movement

TANG Rixin(), LI Jiajia, WANG Zhipeng
Department of Psychology, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, 210023, China
Received:2018-06-04Online:2019-08-25Published:2019-06-24
Contact:TANG Rixin E-mail:trxtrx518@nju.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 研究探讨情绪正-负效价、唤醒度水平(高、中、低)以及有意识评价对推拉动作的影响。分3个实验进行, 收集反应时(RT)和手部动作指标等。实验1使用正-负效价下高、中、低唤醒水平的图片进行评价并执行推-拉动作任务; 实验2使用中性图片和灰色空白图片完成相同任务; 实验3在不进行效价评估情况下完成推-拉动作。结果表明(1)情绪效价对反应时, 运动时间和到达峰速时间等有显著影响:向上拖动图片时, 消极图片拖得更快; 向下拖动时, 则积极图片更快。(2)情绪唤醒度调节情绪效价对推-拉动作的作用:唤醒度越高, 情绪效价尤其是负性情绪对推-拉动作的作用越大; 反之, 则作用越小。(3)无评价条件下, 情绪效价对推-拉动作无显著影响; 即情绪对动作的影响需要有意识评价的参与。这些结果说明情绪对推拉动作影响可能发生在早期, 不仅影响动作计划, 而且影响到随后动作的执行, 而高唤醒度和有意识评价增强了这种影响。



图1实验流程图。图片在分辨率为1920×1080像素的21.5英寸电脑屏幕上呈现和拖动, 请被试按要求站在距电脑屏幕10~15 cm稍接近电脑左半侧的位置, 电脑屏幕中央矩形框会在程序打开后呈现不同效价图片, 图片内靠右侧有一个提示被试放食指(贴marker点)的圆形筐, 屏幕上下两个边缘处各有一个拖放图片的矩形框, 三个矩形框大小一样均为10cm×10cm, 矩形框背景颜色为中性的米黄色。
图1实验流程图。图片在分辨率为1920×1080像素的21.5英寸电脑屏幕上呈现和拖动, 请被试按要求站在距电脑屏幕10~15 cm稍接近电脑左半侧的位置, 电脑屏幕中央矩形框会在程序打开后呈现不同效价图片, 图片内靠右侧有一个提示被试放食指(贴marker点)的圆形筐, 屏幕上下两个边缘处各有一个拖放图片的矩形框, 三个矩形框大小一样均为10cm×10cm, 矩形框背景颜色为中性的米黄色。



图2实验1向上拖动正、负效价图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较
图2实验1向上拖动正、负效价图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较



图3实验1向下拖动正、负效价图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较
图3实验1向下拖动正、负效价图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较



图4实验2向上拖动中性图片和灰色空白图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较
图4实验2向上拖动中性图片和灰色空白图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较



图5实验2向下拖动中性图片、灰色空白图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较
图5实验2向下拖动中性图片、灰色空白图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较



图6实验3向上拖动正、负效价图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较
图6实验3向上拖动正、负效价图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较



图7实验3向下拖动正、负效价图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较
图7实验3向下拖动正、负效价图片在反应时、到达峰速时间、运动时间和峰速上均值的比较







[1] Balcetis E., . ( 2015). Approach and avoidance as organizing structures for motivated distance perception. Emotion Review, 8(2), 115-128.
[2] Bouman D., Stins J. F., & Beek P. J . ( 2015). Arousal and exposure duration affect forward step initiation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1667, 1-10.
[3] Chapman C.S., & Goodale M.A . ( 2010). Seeing all the obstacles in your way: The effect of visual feedback and visual feedback schedule on obstacle avoidance while reaching. Experimental Brain Research, 202(2), 363-375.
[4] Chen M., & Bargh J.A . ( 1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215-224.
[5] Chester D.S., & DeWall C.N . ( 2017). Combating the sting of rejection with the pleasure of revenge: A new look at how emotion shapes aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 413-430.
[6] Ciardo F., Campanini I., Merlo A., Rubichi S., & Iani C . ( 2018). The role of perspective in discriminating between social and non-social intentions from reach-to-grasp kinematics. Psychological Research, 82(5), 915-928.
[7] De Houwer J., Crombez G., Baeyens F., & Hermans D . ( 2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition & Emotion, 15(2), 189-206.
[8] Dixon M. L., Thiruchselvam R., Todd R., & Christoff K . ( 2017). Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143(10), 1033-1081.
[9] Duckworth K. L., Bargh J. A., Garcia M., & Chaiken S . ( 2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13(6), 513-519.
[10] Eder A.B., & Rothermund K. , ( 2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 262-281.
[11] Fan N., Xu X., & Zhou F. J . ( 2017). The influence from arousal to affective priming effect of Chinese emotional words. Psychological Exploration. 37(1), 23-28.
[ 范宁, 许骁, 周芳洁 . ( 2017). 唤醒度对汉语情绪词情绪启动效应的影响. 心理学探新, 37(1), 23-28.]
[12] Fang P., Chen M. Q., & Jiang Y . ( 2006). Experimental paradigms of affective priming. Psychological Science, 29(6), 1396-1399.
[ 方平, 陈满琪, 姜媛 . ( 2006). 情绪启动研究的实验范式. 心理科学, 29(6), 1396-1399.]
[13] Frijda N. H., Kuipers P., & Ter Schure E . ( 1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57(2), 212-228.
[14] Fu L. S., Yu J. J., Ni S. G., & Li H . ( 2018). Reduced framing effect: Experience adjusts affective forecasting with losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 231-38.
[15] Goodale, M. A., & Humphrey, G. K . ( 1998). The objects of action and perception. Cognition, 67(1-2), 181-207.
[16] Grau J. W., Crown E. D., Ferguson A. R., Washburn S. N., Hook M. A., & Miranda R. C . ( 2006). Instrumental learning within the spinal cord: Underlying mechanisms and implications for recovery after injury. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 5(4), 191-239.
[17] Jamieson J. P., Hangen E. J., Lee H. Y., & Yeager D. S . ( 2017). Capitalizing on appraisal processes to improve affective responses to social stress. Emotion Review, 10(1), 30-39.
[18] Kappes C., Streubel B., Droste K. L., & Folta-Schoofs K . ( 2017). Linking the positivity effect in attention with affective outcomes: Age group differences and the role of arousal . Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1877. 1-11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01877.
[19] Kret M. E., & Bocanegra, B. R. ., (2016). Editorial: Adaptive hot cognition: How emotion drives information processing and cognition steers affective processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1920. 1-4. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01920.
[20] Krpan D., & Schnall S. , ( 2014). Too close for comfort: Stimulus valence moderates the influence of motivational orientation on distance perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(6), 978-993.
[21] Kuppens P., Tuerlinckx F., Russell J. A., & Barrett L. F . ( 2013). The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 917-940.
[22] Landau M. J., Meier B. P., & Keefer L. A . ( 2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045-1067.
[23] Lang P.J., & Bradley M.M . ( 2013). Appetitive and defensive motivation: Goal-directed or goal-determined? Emotion Review, 5(3), 230-234.
[24] Li X. D., Ye H. S., & Ding D. Q . ( 2018). Understanding by action: A perspect of embodied social cognition. Psychological Exploration, 38(1), 20-24.
[ 黎晓丹, 叶浩生, 丁道群 . ( 2018). 通过身体动作理解人与环境:具身的社会认知. 心理学探新, 38(1), 20-24.]
[25] Liu Y., Fu Q. F., Fu X. L . ( 2009). The interaction between cognition and emotion. Chinese Science Bulletin, 54(18), 2783-2796.
[ 刘烨, 付秋芳, 傅小兰 . ( 2009). 认知与情绪的交互作用. 科学通报, 54(18), 2783-2796.]
[26] Mather M., & Sutherland M.R . ( 2011). Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 114-133.
[27] Moscarello J.M., & LeDoux J.E . ( 2013). The contribution of the amygdala to aversive and appetitive Pavlovian processes. Emotion Review, 5(3), 248-253.
[28] Panksepp J., . ( 2013). Cross-species neuroaffective parsing of primal emotional desires and aversions in mammals. Emotion Review, 5(3), 235-240.
[29] Pereira M. G., de Oliveira L., Erthal F. S., Joffily M., Mocaiber I. F., & Volchan E., & Pessoa L . ( 2010). Emotion affects action: Midcingulate cortex as a pivotal node of interaction between negative emotion and motor signals. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(1), 94-106.
[30] Pool E., Brosch T., Delplanque S., & Sander D . ( 2016). Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation. Psychological Bulletin, 142(1), 79-106.
[31] Putkinen V., Makkonen T., & Eerola T . ( 2017). Music-induced positive mood broadens the scope of auditory attention. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(7), 1159-1168.
[32] Reimann M., & Bechara A. , ( 2010). The somatic marker framework as a neurological theory of decision-making: Review, conceptual comparisons, and future neuroeconomics research. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(5), 767-776.
[33] Reisenzein R., , ( 2017). The legacy of cognition-arousal theory: Introduction to a special section of emotion review. Emotion Review, 9(1), 3-6.
[34] Rolls E.T . ( 2013). What are emotional states, and why do we have them? Emotion Review, 5(3), 241-247.
[35] Rotteveel M., & Phaf. RH . ( 2004). Automatic affective evaluation does not automatically predispose for arm flexion and extension. Emotion, 4(2), 156-172.
[36] Rougier M., Muller D., Ric F., Alexopoulos T., Batailler C., & Smeding A., & Aubéb B . ( 2018). A new look at sensorimotor aspects in approach/avoidance tendencies: The role of visual whole-body movement information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 42-53.
[37] Russell J.A . ( 1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178.
[38] Saxton B. T., Myhre S. K., Siyaguna T., & Rokke P. D . ( 2018). Do arousal and valence have separable influences on attention across time? Psychological Research, 1-17.
[39] Siemer M., Mauss I., & Gross J. J . ( 2007). Same situation-different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 7(3), 592-600.
[40] Solarz A.K . ( 1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 239-245.
[41] Tang R. X., Whitwell R. L., & Goodale M. A . ( 2015). The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set. Cognition, 138, 49-63.
[42] Tang R. X., Whitwell R. L., & Goodale M. A . ( 2016). Unusual hand postures but not familiar tools show motor equivalence with precision grasping. Cognition, 151, 28-36.
[43] Veling H., & Aarts H. , ( 2011). Unintentional preparation of motor impulses after incidental perception of need-rewarding objects. Cognition & Emotion, 25(6), 1131-1138.
[44] Wang H.L., Mo L. ., ( 2017). "Action-evaluation" effect: The interaction between body movement and cognitive activity. Studies of Psychology &Behavior . 15(5), 626-632.
[ 王汉林, 莫雷 . ( 2017). “动作-评价” 效应: 动作与认知的交互作用. 心理与行为研究, 15(5), 626-632.]
[45] Wang R. Y., Fan N., & University H . ( 2016). An explanation about reversal effect of affective priming in Chinese character: The interaction between frequency and task paradigm. Journal of Psychological Science. 39(3), 559-565.
[ 王若茵, 范宁 . ( 2016). 任务与字频对汉字情绪启动反转效应的影响. 心理科学, 39(3), 559-565.]
[46] Whitwell R. L., Lambert L. M., & Goodale M. A . ( 2008). Grasping future events: Explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 188(4), 603-611.
[47] Xu H. F., Zhang Q., & Guo C. Y . ( 2015). Different effects of valence and arousal on familiarity and recollection. Journal of Psychological Science, 38(2), 263-269
[ 徐慧芳, 张钦, 郭春彦 . ( 2015). 情绪效价和唤醒对熟悉性和回想的不同影响. 心理科学, 38(2), 263-269]
[48] Yan L., Zuo B., & Wu Y . ( 2016). Affective coherence and its influence on cognitive processing . Journal of Psychological Science. 39(6), 1379-1384.
[ 严磊, 佐斌, 吴漾 ( 2016). 情感一致性及其对认知加工的影响. 心理科学, 39(6), 1379-1384.]
[49] Ye H. S . ( 2010). Embodied cognition: A new approach in cognitive psychology. Advance in Psychological Science, 18(5), 705-710.
[ 叶浩生 . ( 2010). 具身认知:认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710]
[50] Zhang Y. M., Proctor R. W., & Wegener D. T . ( 2012). Approach-avoidance actions or categorization? A matching account of reference valence effects in affective S-R compatibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 609-616.
[51] Zhao S.C., & Zheng X.F, . ( 2017). The behavior inhibition characteristics of different arousal negative stimulation. Psychological Research. 10(1), 17-23.
[ 赵绍晨, 郑希付 . ( 2017). 不同唤醒度负性刺激抑制控制特点. 心理研究, 10(1), 17-23.]




[1]程瑞, 卢克龙, 郝宁. 愤怒情绪对恶意创造力的影响及调节策略[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 847-860.
[2]宋琪, 陈扬. 需求和接受的授权型领导匹配对下属工作结果的影响:情绪耗竭的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 890-903.
[3]熊承清, 许佳颖, 马丹阳, 刘永芳. 囚徒困境博弈中对手面部表情对合作行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(8): 919-932.
[4]袁加锦, 张祎程, 陈圣栋, 罗利, 茹怡珊. 中国情绪调节词语库的初步编制与试用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 445-455.
[5]宋锡妍, 程亚华, 谢周秀甜, 龚楠焰, 刘雷. 愤怒情绪对延迟折扣的影响:确定感和控制感的中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 456-468.
[6]莫李澄, 郭田友, 张岳瑶, 徐锋, 张丹丹. 激活右腹外侧前额叶提高抑郁症患者对社会疼痛的情绪调节能力:一项TMS研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 494-504.
[7]杨伟文, 李超平. 资质过剩感对个体绩效的作用效果及机制:基于情绪-认知加工系统与文化情境的元分析[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(5): 527-554.
[8]侯娟, 朱英格, 方晓义. 手机成瘾与抑郁:社交焦虑和负性情绪信息注意偏向的多重中介作用[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(4): 362-373.
[9]刘宇平, 李姗珊, 何赟, 王豆豆, 杨波. 消除威胁或无能狂怒?自恋对暴力犯攻击的影响机制[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(3): 244-258.
[10]佐斌, 戴月娥, 温芳芳, 高佳, 谢志杰, 何赛飞. 人如其食:食物性别刻板印象及对人物评价的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(3): 259-272.
[11]雷震, 毕蓉, 莫李澄, 于文汶, 张丹丹. 外显和内隐情绪韵律加工的脑机制:近红外成像研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 15-25.
[12]黄月胜, 张豹, 范兴华, 黄杰. 无关工作记忆表征的负性情绪信息能否捕获视觉注意?一项眼动研究[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 26-37.
[13]苗晓燕, 孙欣, 匡仪, 汪祚军. 共患难, 更同盟:共同经历相同负性情绪事件促进合作行为[J]. 心理学报, 2021, 53(1): 81-94.
[14]华艳, 李明霞, 王巧婷, 冯彩霞, 张晶. 左侧眶额皮层在自动情绪调节下注意选择中的作用:来自经颅直流电刺激的证据[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1048-1056.
[15]李树文, 罗瑾琏. 领导-下属情绪评价能力一致与员工建言:内部人身份感知与性别相似性的作用[J]. 心理学报, 2020, 52(9): 1121-1131.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4486
相关话题/图片 实验 心理 运动 科学