), 金童林 内蒙古师范大学心理学院, 呼和浩特 010022
收稿日期:2020-12-07出版日期:2021-10-15发布日期:2021-08-23通讯作者:乌云特娜E-mail:wuyuntena@163.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金资助项目(BMA170035)The expression mechanism of individual behavior in the perspective of I3 model
ZHANG Lu, WU Yuntena(), JIN Tonglin College of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
Received:2020-12-07Online:2021-10-15Published:2021-08-23Contact:WU Yuntena E-mail:wuyuntena@163.com摘要/Abstract
摘要： I3模型塑造了一个解释个体行为的理论框架, 认为所有的行为都来自刺激、驱力和抑制三个因素的组合, 任何一个因素都可以独立于其余两个而变化, 其结构是由一个结果(行为)、一个中介(行为倾向)和三个因素(刺激、驱力和抑制)组成的12条路径的综合模型。这12条路径通过描述18个问题来预测个体在具体背景下的行为机制, 比如攻击行为、进食行为等。为有效促进该理论的应用, 文章对该理论的合理性、科学性、独特价值, 以及存在的问题进行评价, 并进一步提出未来的研究方向。
图/表 2
图1I3模型结构图(资料来源: Finkel, 2014)
图1I3模型结构图(资料来源: Finkel, 2014)表1I3模型的18个效应问题
| 效应 | 路径 | 理论问题 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 路径1 | 刺激因素对行为的影响? |
| 2 | 路径2 | 抑制因素对行为的影响? |
| 3 | 路径3 | 驱力因素对行为的影响? |
| 4 | 路径4 | 驱力因素和刺激因素对行为的影响? |
| 5 | 路径5 | 抑制因素和驱力因素对行为的影响? |
| 6 | 路径6 | 抑制因素和刺激因素对行为的影响? |
| 7 | 路径7 | 抑制因素×刺激因素×驱力因素交互作用对行为的影响? |
| 8 | 路径8 | 刺激因素对行为倾向的影响? |
| 9 | 路径9 | 驱力因素对行为倾向的影响? |
| 10 | 路径10 | 刺激因素和驱力因素对行为倾向的影响? |
| 11 | 路径11 | 行为倾向对行为的影响? |
| 12 | 路径12 | 抑制因素在行为倾向和行为之间的调节作用? |
| 13 | 路径8/11 | 行为倾向在刺激因素和行为之间的中介作用? |
| 14 | 路径9/11 | 行为倾向在驱力因素和行为之间的中介作用? |
| 15 | 路径10/11 | 行为倾向在刺激×驱力交互作用和行为之间的中介作用? |
| 16 | 路径8/12 | 抑制对刺激→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
| 17 | 路径9/12 | 抑制对驱力→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
| 18 | 路径10/12 | 抑制对刺激×驱力→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
表1I3模型的18个效应问题
| 效应 | 路径 | 理论问题 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 路径1 | 刺激因素对行为的影响? |
| 2 | 路径2 | 抑制因素对行为的影响? |
| 3 | 路径3 | 驱力因素对行为的影响? |
| 4 | 路径4 | 驱力因素和刺激因素对行为的影响? |
| 5 | 路径5 | 抑制因素和驱力因素对行为的影响? |
| 6 | 路径6 | 抑制因素和刺激因素对行为的影响? |
| 7 | 路径7 | 抑制因素×刺激因素×驱力因素交互作用对行为的影响? |
| 8 | 路径8 | 刺激因素对行为倾向的影响? |
| 9 | 路径9 | 驱力因素对行为倾向的影响? |
| 10 | 路径10 | 刺激因素和驱力因素对行为倾向的影响? |
| 11 | 路径11 | 行为倾向对行为的影响? |
| 12 | 路径12 | 抑制因素在行为倾向和行为之间的调节作用? |
| 13 | 路径8/11 | 行为倾向在刺激因素和行为之间的中介作用? |
| 14 | 路径9/11 | 行为倾向在驱力因素和行为之间的中介作用? |
| 15 | 路径10/11 | 行为倾向在刺激×驱力交互作用和行为之间的中介作用? |
| 16 | 路径8/12 | 抑制对刺激→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
| 17 | 路径9/12 | 抑制对驱力→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
| 18 | 路径10/12 | 抑制对刺激×驱力→行为倾向→行为的有调节的中介效应? |
参考文献 52
| [1] | 姜永志. (2014). 西方心理学理论分类体系的反思与建构. 心理科学进展, 22(2), 348-356. |
| [2] | 李佳洁, 于彤彤. (2020). 基于助推的健康饮食行为干预策略. 心理科学进展, 28(12), 2052-2063. |
| [3] | 尚新民. (1988). 环境·心理·行为——兼论西方行为主义心理学的兴起与衰落. 心理学探新, 4, 39-44. |
| [4] | 王延松, 霍涌泉. (2007). 后现代主义心理学在元理论方面的反思. 宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版), 29(6), 239- 242. |
| [5] | 辛自强. (2002). 智能结构三层次理论述评. 心理科学, 25(6), 686-766. |
| [6] | 叶浩生. (2003). 论理论心理学的概念、性质与作用. 湖南师范大学教育科学学报, 2(3), 58-61. |
| [7] | Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TURL |
| [8] | Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51. pmid: 11752478 |
| [9] | Anderson, C. A., Deuser, W. E., & DeNeve, K. M. (1995). Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(5), 434-448. doi: 10.1177/0146167295215002URL |
| [10] | Baron, R. A., & Richardson, D. R. (1994). Human aggression. New York: Plenum. |
| [11] | Braat, M., Engelen, J., van Gemert, T., & Verhaegh, S. (2020). The rise and fall of behaviorism: The narrative and the numbers. History of Psychology, 23(3), 252-280. doi: 10.1037/hop0000146URL |
| [12] | Birkley, E. L., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2019). Effects of instigation, anger, and emotion regulation on intimate partner aggression: Examination of “perfect storm” theory. Psychology of Violence, 9(2), 186-195. doi: 10.1037/vio0000190 |
| [13] | Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574-609. doi: 10.1177/1094428116641191URL |
| [14] | Chen, Y. (2020). An investigation of the influencing factors of Chinese WeChat users' environmental information-sharing behavior based on an integrated model of UGT, NAM, and TPB. Sustainability, 12(7), 1-19. doi: 10.3390/su12010001URL |
| [15] | Denson, T. F., Capper, M. M., Oaten, M., Friese, M., & Schofield, T. O. (2011). Self-control training decreases aggression in response to provocation in aggressive individuals. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), 252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.001URL |
| [16] | Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Theory and metatheory in the study of dual processing: Reply to comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 263-271. doi: 10.1177/1745691613483774URL |
| [17] | Finkel, E. J. (2007). Impelling and inhibiting forces in the perpetration of intimate partner violence. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 193-207. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.193URL |
| [18] | Finkel, E. J. (2014). The I3 model:Metatheory, theory, and evidence. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 1-104). Academic Press. |
| [19] | Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 263-277. pmid: 11519931 |
| [20] | Finkel, E. J., DeWall, C. N., Slotter, E. B., McNulty, J. K., Pond, R. S., & Atkins, D. C. (2012). Using I3 theory to clarify when dispositional aggressiveness predicts intimate partner violence perpetration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 533-549. doi: 10.1037/a0025651pmid: 21967005 |
| [21] | Finkel, E. J., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2013). Intimate partner violence. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 452-474). Oxford. |
| [22] | Finkel, E. J., & Hall, A. N. (2018). The I3 model: A metatheoretical framework for understanding aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 125-130. doi: S2352-250X(17)30063-5pmid: 29279210 |
| [23] | Finkel, E. J., Herbst, K. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2011). The obesity superhighway: An I3theory analysis of unhealthy food consumption. Advances in Consumer Research, 38, 491-493. |
| [24] | Finkel, E. J., & Slotter, E. B. (2009). An I3 theory analysis of human sex differences in aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3/4), 249-311. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09990951URL |
| [25] | Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press. |
| [26] | Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 692-731. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692pmid: 16910748 |
| [27] | Grom, J. L., Crane, C., Leone, R. M., Parrott, D. J., & Eckhardt, C. (2019). Sexual violence perpetration within intimate relationships: An I3 model analysis of the effects of sexual violence victimization and psychological flexibility. Sexual Abuse, 33(1), 114-132. doi: 10.1177/1079063219877176URL |
| [28] | Guo, Q., Sun, P., & Li, L. (2018). Shyness and online prosocial behavior: A study on multiple mediation mechanisms. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.032URL |
| [29] | Hellsten, L. A. M., Hendry, B. P., McIntyre, L. J., Koole, M., & Myburgh, J. E. (2020, January). Reimagining the I3 model: Addressing the limitations of the I3 model as applied to cyberbullying in Saskatchewan. Paper presented at the meeting of 2020 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Ottawa, CA. |
| [30] | Hill, R. J. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Contemporary Sociology, 6(2), 244-245. doi: 10.2307/2065853URL |
| [31] | Larrick, R. P., Timmerman, T. A., Carton, A. M., & Abrevaya, J. (2011). Temper, temperature, and temptation: Heat-related retaliation in baseball. Psychological Science, 22(4), 423- 428. doi: 10.1177/0956797611399292URL |
| [32] | Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. |
| [33] | Li, J. B., Nie, Y. G., Boardley, I. D., Dou, K., & Situ, Q. M. (2015). When do normative beliefs about aggression predict aggressive behavior? An application of I3 theory. Aggressive Behavior, 41(6), 544-555. doi: 10.1002/ab.v41.6URL |
| [34] | MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614. pmid: 16968208 |
| [35] | Markwald, R. R., Melanson, E. L., Smith, M. R., Higgins, J., Perreault, L., Eckel, R. H., & Wright, K. P. (2013). Impact of insufficient sleep on total daily energy expenditure, food intake, and weight gain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(14), 5695-5700. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216951110URL |
| [36] | Masrom, M. B., Busalim, A. H., Abuhassna, H., & Mahmood, N. H. N. (2021). Understanding students' behavior in online social networks: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(6), 1-27. doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00238-7URL |
| [37] | Mazur, L. B. (2020). Progress in psychological science. The importance of informed ignorance and curiosity-driven questions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54, 613-624. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09538-zURL |
| [38] | Montuoro, P., & Mainhard, T. (2017). An investigation of the mechanism underlying teacher aggression: Testing I3 theory and the General Aggression Model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 497-517. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12161pmid: 28485009 |
| [39] | Morton, L. C. (2014). The dieting paradox: Using I3 theory to explain counter-regulatory eating. Ann Arbor: ProQuest LLC. |
| [40] | Myburg, J. E., Andrie, S., & Hellsten, L. A. (2016). Cyberbullying from the perspective of I3 theory: The role of instigating triggers and impelling forces. Education Matters: The Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 1-6. |
| [41] | Priest, G. (2020). Metatheory and dialetheism. Logical Investigations, 26(1), 48-59. doi: 10.21146/2074-1472-2020-26-1-48-59URL |
| [42] | Slotter, E. B., & Finkel, E. J. (2011). I3 theory: Instigating, impelling, and inhibiting factors in aggression. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences (pp. 35-52). American Psychological Association. |
| [43] | Slotter, E. B., Finkel, E. J., DeWall, C. N., Pond, R. S. Jr., Lambert, N. M., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Fincham, F. D. (2012). Putting the brakes on aggression toward a romantic partner: The inhibitory influence of relationship commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 291-305. doi: 10.1037/a0024915pmid: 21823802 |
| [44] | Smith, E. R. (2012). Editorial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1-3. doi: 10.1037/a0026676URL |
| [45] | Stämpfli, A. E., Stöckli, S., Brunner, T. A., & Messner, C. (2020). A dieting facilitator on the fridge door: Can dieters deliberately apply environmental dieting cues to lose weight? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00001URL |
| [46] | Stroebe, W., Mensink, W., Aarts, H., Schut, H., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2008). Why dieters fail: Testing the goal conflict model of eating. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.005URL |
| [47] | Stroebe, W., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Papies, E. K., & Aarts, H. (2013). Why most dieters fail but some succeed: A goal conflict model of eating behavior. Psychological Review, 120(1), 110-138. doi: 10.1037/a0030849URL |
| [48] | Valle, C. G., Nezami, B. T., & Tate, D. F. (2020). Designing in-app messages to nudge behavior change: Lessons learned from a weight management app for young adults. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.004URL |
| [49] | Watrin, J. P., & Darwich, R. (2012). On behaviorism in the cognitive revolution: Myth and reactions. Review of General Psychology, 16(3), 269-282. doi: 10.1037/a0026766URL |
| [50] | Winiewski, M., Budziszewska, M., & Świder, M. (2019). Differentiated content of verbal aggression: Effect of gender on insults in secondary schools in Poland. School Psychology International, 40(5), 493-509. doi: 10.1177/0143034319867745 |
| [51] | Wong, R. Y. M., Cheung, C. M. K., & Xiao, B. (2017). Does gender matter in cyberbullying perpetration? An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 247- 257. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.022URL |
| [52] | Zagaria, A., Ando, A., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Psychology: A giant with feet of clay. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 54(3), 521-562. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5pmid: 32297037 |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 郝喜玲, 刘依冉, 杜晶晶, 郑方. 失败恐惧的形成及对创业行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(9): 1551-1560. |
| [2] | 武丽丽, 程刚, 张大均. 重复性急性应激对攻击行为的影响及调控机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1358-1370. |
| [3] | 张玮玮, 朱莉琪. 同伴对青少年冒险行为的影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1462-1471. |
| [4] | 李玲玲, 黄桂. 组织中个体主动性行为“利与弊”[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1484-1496. |
| [5] | 顾潇, 王玉慧, 雷雳. 社交媒体中自拍相关行为对身体映像的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1497-1507. |
| [6] | 朱亚琳, 金灿灿. 黑暗三联征与攻击行为关系的元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1195-1209. |
| [7] | 彭坚, 曹兵兵. 追随者主动工作行为的上行影响：内隐追随视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 967-977. |
| [8] | 彭家敏, 谢礼珊, 关新华. 虚拟健康社区医生贡献行为的形成机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 978-989. |
| [9] | 林爽, 刘文, 王薇薇, 张雪. 成熟对青春期型反社会行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1042-1055. |
| [10] | 包寒吴霜, 蔡华俭. 姓名对个体心理与行为的实际影响：证据和理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1067-1085. |
| [11] | 尹奎, 赵景, 李璨, 王宏蕾, 王崇锋. 领导授权行为的形成机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1097-1110. |
| [12] | 陈坤瑜, 王琦, 王霞, 邢采. 体验型消费和实物型消费的差异：研究方法及效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1111-1121. |
| [13] | 冯廷勇, 王雪珂, 苏缇. 拖延行为的发展认知机制及神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 586-596. |
| [14] | 黄骐, 陈春萍, 罗跃嘉, 伍海燕. 好奇心的机制及作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 723-736. |
| [15] | 董小炜, 秦昕, 陈晨, 黄鸣鹏, 邓惠如, 周汉森, 宋博迪. 组织行为学中的时间相关研究与未来方向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 747-760. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5605
