删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

幸福感的稳态与跃迁:一个新的整合视角

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

孙俊芳1,2, 辛自强3, 包呼格吉乐图1,4(), 刘敏1, 岳衡1
1内蒙古师范大学心理学院, 呼和浩特 011517
2集宁师范学院教育科学学院, 乌兰察布 012000
3中央财经大学社会与心理学院, 北京 100081
4内蒙古师范大学体育学院, 呼和浩特 010022
收稿日期:2020-06-24出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26
通讯作者:包呼格吉乐图E-mail:baohuge@imnu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目(17ZDA325);内蒙古师范大学2019年度研究生科研创新基金项目(CXJJB19007)

Homeostasis and transition of well-being: A new integrative perspective

SUN Junfang1,2, XIN Ziqiang3, BAO Hugejiletu1,4(), LIU Min1, YUE Heng1
1School of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 011517, China
2School of Educational Science, Jining Normal University, Ulanqab 012000, China
3School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China
4School of Physical Education, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022 , China
Received:2020-06-24Online:2021-03-15Published:2021-01-26
Contact:BAO Hugejiletu E-mail:baohuge@imnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 以往的实证和理论研究对幸福感稳定性与变化性问题持有不同观点。设定点理论认为幸福感通常保持在设定点位置, 动态平衡理论(及其变式——主观幸福感稳态理论)进一步强调幸福感在围绕设定点的某个范围内波动而呈动态平衡状态, 享乐适应理论在动态平衡理论基础上从情绪适应的角度分析了幸福感维持稳定的原因, 这三个理论均强调幸福感维持在某个平衡水平。相反, 持续幸福理论强调幸福感是可以提升的, 能发生长期的变化。这些理论观点的差异本质在于如何看待幸福感的稳定性与变化性, 我们借用生物学中的“稳态”“稳态应激”概念及物理学中的“跃迁”思想, 认为幸福感不仅存在稳态, 也会出现稳态应激, 并可由此引起幸福感稳态的跃升。这一整合视角为幸福感研究提供了新的解释框架, 也对幸福感的持续提升有启发意义。


表1各种幸福感理论的比较分析
设定点理论 动态平衡理论 享乐适应理论 持续幸福理论
幸福感的影响因素 遗传因素 遗传因素、环境因素(生活事件、外界刺激) 情绪的适应、生活事件 遗传因素、环境因素、有意图的活动
影响因素类型 生理因素 生理因素、环境因素 心理因素、环境因素 生理因素、环境因素、心理因素
稳定性的影响因素 遗传因素 遗传因素 情绪的适应 遗传因素
变化性的影响因素 环境因素 生活事件 环境因素、有意图的活动
稳定与变化的过程、机制 稳态
负反馈
稳态
负反馈
稳态
负反馈
稳态应激
正反馈
幸福感调节的结果 回到设定点 回到设定点(范围) 回到平衡水平 强调形成新平衡态(稳态的跃迁)
模型思维 物理学模型 生理学模型 生理学模型 生态学模型

表1各种幸福感理论的比较分析
设定点理论 动态平衡理论 享乐适应理论 持续幸福理论
幸福感的影响因素 遗传因素 遗传因素、环境因素(生活事件、外界刺激) 情绪的适应、生活事件 遗传因素、环境因素、有意图的活动
影响因素类型 生理因素 生理因素、环境因素 心理因素、环境因素 生理因素、环境因素、心理因素
稳定性的影响因素 遗传因素 遗传因素 情绪的适应 遗传因素
变化性的影响因素 环境因素 生活事件 环境因素、有意图的活动
稳定与变化的过程、机制 稳态
负反馈
稳态
负反馈
稳态
负反馈
稳态应激
正反馈
幸福感调节的结果 回到设定点 回到设定点(范围) 回到平衡水平 强调形成新平衡态(稳态的跃迁)
模型思维 物理学模型 生理学模型 生理学模型 生态学模型







[1] 韩黎, 廖传景, 张继华. (2016). 压力性生活事件与幸福感: 情绪调节与心理韧性的多重中介模型. 中国特殊教育, (11), 75-81,37.
[2] 侯典牧, 刘翔平, 李毅. (2012). 基于优势的大学生乐观干预训练. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(1), 120-124.
[3] (美)坎农. (1982). 躯体的智慧 (范岳年, 魏有仁译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
[4] (美)马丁·塞利格曼. (2010). 真实的幸福 (洪兰译). 沈阳: 万卷出版公司.
[5] 彭凯平. (2017). 为什么幸福是21世纪的重要话题?. 精神文明导刊, (11), 46-47.
[6] 王江洋, 肖青, 聂家昕, 高亚华. (2019). 孤儿小学生主观幸福感的积极心理教育干预. 心理与行为研究, 17(5), 634-643.
[7] 王之璋. (1988). 稳态·平衡·协调——平衡的内涵与形式新探. 哲学研究, (1), 24-30.
[8] 徐晓攀, 牛宗岭. (2019). 同伴拒斥与家庭贫困儿童幸福感: 有调节的中介效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(4), 795-799.
[9] 尹霞云, 黎志华. (2015). 主观幸福感: 稳定的人格特质还是情境状态. 心理与行为研究, 13(4), 521-527.
[10] 余樱, 景奉杰. (2016). 享乐适应理论的发展及应用. 心理科学进展, 24(10), 1663-1669.
[11] 张丽, 辛自强, 李红, 林崇德. (2010). 探测认知发展的非连续性: 思路与方法. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 100-106.
[12] 张铭. (2015). 稳态应激——变化的稳态. 生理科学进展, 46(4), 269-272.
[13] 曾红, 郭斯萍. (2012). “乐”——中国人的主观幸福感与传统文化中的幸福观. 心理学报, 44(7), 986-994.
[14] Ashton-James, C. E., & Chemke-Dreyfus, A. (2019). Can orthognathic surgery be expected to improve patients' psychological well-being? The challenge of hedonic adaptation. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 127(3), 189-195.
URLpmid: 30869174
[15] Barazzetta, M., Appleton, S., & Owens, T. (2020). Hedonic adaptation to treatment: Evidence from a medical intervention. Journal of Development Studies, 56(3), 613-629.
[16] Bartlett, M. Y., & Arpin, S. N. (2019). Gratitude and loneliness: Enhancing health and well-being in older adults. Research on Aging, 41(8), 772-793.
URLpmid: 31043126
[17] Bohr, N. (1913). On the constitution of atoms and molecules. Philosophical Magazine Series 6, 26(151), 1-25.
[18] Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory: A symposium (pp. 287-305). New York: Academic Press.
[19] Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917-927.
URLpmid: 690806
[20] Ceja, L., & Navarro, J. (2012). “Suddenly I get into the zone”: Examining discontinuities and nonlinear changes in flow experiences at work. Human Relations, 65(9), 1101-1127.
[21] Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668-678.
URLpmid: 7381680
[22] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Learning, “flow”, and happiness. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 153-172). Dordrecht: Springer.
[23] Cummins R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 35(2), 179-200.
doi: 10.1007/BF01079026URL
[24] Cummins R. A. (2010). Subjective well-being, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(1), 1-17.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0URL
[25] Cummins R. A. (2012). The determinants of happiness. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(1), 86-101.
doi: 10.1504/IJHD.2012.050833URL
[26] Cummins R. A. (2016). The theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: A contribution to understanding life quality. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life (Vol.60, pp. 61-79). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
[27] Cummins, R. A., Gullone, E., & Lau, A. L. D. (2002). A model of subjective well-being homeostasis: The role of personality. In E. Gullone, & R. A. Cummins (Eds.), The universality of subjective wellbeing indicators (Vol. 16, pp. 7-46). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[28] Cummins, R. A., & Land, K. C. (2018). Capabilities, subjective wellbeing and public policy: A response to Austin (2016). Social Indicators Research, 140(1), 157-173.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-017-1763-5URL
[29] Cummins, R. A., & Wooden, M. (2014). Personal resilience in times of crisis: The implications of SWB homeostasis and set-points. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(1), 223-235.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-013-9481-4URL
[30] Deng, Y., Xiang, R., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Yu, S., & Liu, X. (2019). Counting blessings and sharing gratitude in a Chinese prisoner sample: Effects of gratitude-based interventions on subjective well-being and aggression. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(3), 303-311.
doi: 10.1080/17439760.2018.1460687URL
[31] Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276URL
[32] Easterlin, R. A.(1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David, & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89-125). New York: Academic Press.
[33] Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective wellbeing in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377-389.
URLpmid: 12585811
[34] Etxeberria, I., Etxebarria, I., & Urdaneta, E. (2019). Subjective well-being among the oldest old: The role of personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 209-216.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.042URL
[35] Fossas, A. (2019). Psychological maturity predicts different forms of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1933-1952.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-018-0033-9URL
[36] Frederick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302-329). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
[37] Galiani, S., Gertler, P. J., & Undurraga, R. (2018). The half-life of happiness: Hedonic adaptation in the subjective well-being of poor slum dwellers to the satisfaction of basic housing needs. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(4), 1189-1233.
doi: 10.1093/jeea/jvx042URL
[38] Gander, F., Hofmann, J., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2020). Character strengths—Stability, change, and relationships with well-being changes. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15, 349-367.
doi: 10.1007/s11482-018-9690-4URL
[39] Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731-739.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.731URL
[40] Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(42), 17922-17926.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008612107URL
[41] Kammann, R. (1983). Objective circumstances, life satisfactions, and sense of well-being: Consistencies across time and place. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 14-22.
[42] Lucas R. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being: Does happiness change after major life events. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 75-79.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00479.xURL
[43] Lucas, R. E., & Clark, A. E. (2006). Do people really adapt to marriage? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 405-426.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-006-9001-xURL
[44] Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set-point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527-539.
doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.527URLpmid: 12635914
[45] Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2009). Personality and subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being (Vol. 37, pp. 75-102). Dordrecht: Springer.
[46] Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186-189.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00355.xURL
[47] Lyubomirsky, S. (2010). Hedonic adaptation to positive and negative experiences. In S. Folkman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 200-224). New York: Oxford University Press.
[48] Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111-131.
doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111URL
[49] McCullough, M. E Pargament, K. I & Thoresen, C. E.(Eds.).(2000). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford Press.
[50] Morris, M. B., Burns, G. N., Periard, D. A., & Shoda, E. A. (2015). Extraversion-emotional stability circumplex traits and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(6), 1509-1523.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9573-9URL
[51] Nes, R. B., R?ysamb, E., Tambs, K., Harris, J. R., & Reichborn-Kjennerud, T. (2006). Subjective well-being: Genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychological Medicine, 36(7), 1033-1042.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291706007409URLpmid: 16749947
[52] Perez-Truglia, R. (2012). On the causes and consequences of hedonic adaptation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(6), 1182-1192.
doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.08.004URL
[53] Rotenberg V. S. (2013). “Genes of happiness and wellbeing” in the context of search activity concept. Activitas Nervosa Superior, 55(1-2), 1-14.
doi: 10.1007/BF03379593URL
[54] R?ysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vitters?, J. (2014). Well-being: Heritable and changeable. In K. M. Sheldon, & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness: Theories and evidence on whether happiness can change (pp. 9-36). New York: Elsevier Academic Press.
[55] Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). Achieving sustainable gains in happiness: Change your actions, not your circumstances. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(1), 55-86.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-005-0868-8URL
[56] Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). The challenge of staying happier: Testing the hedonic adaptation prevention model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 670-680.
doi: 10.1177/0146167212436400URL
[57] Silver R. L. (1982). Coping with an undesirable life event: A study of early reactions to physical disability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston.
[58] Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467-487.
doi: 10.1002/jclp.20593URLpmid: 19301241
[59] Sterling, P., & Eyer, J. (1988). Allostasis: A new paradigm to explain arousal pathology. In S. Fisher, & J. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of life stress, cognition and health ( pp. 629-649). Chichester, England: Wiley.
[60] Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). Strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 149-156.
doi: 10.1080/17439760701228938URL
[61] Tomyn, A. J., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2015). Intervention efficacy among “at risk” adolescents: A test of subjective wellbeing homeostasis theory. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 883-895.
doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0619-5URL
[62] Weinberg, M. K., Heath, N., & Tomyn, A. J. (2016). Rebound or resignation: Developing a predictive model of return to subjective wellbeing set-point. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1565-1575.
doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9659-zURL
[63] Weiss, A., Bates, T. C., & Luciano, M. (2008). Happiness is a personal (ity) thing: The genetics of personality and well-being in a representative sample. Psychological Science, 19(3), 205-210.
URLpmid: 18315789




[1]彭家敏, 谢礼珊, 关新华. 虚拟健康社区医生贡献行为的形成机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 978-989.
[2]陈浩彬, 汪凤炎. 老年人的智慧[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 885-893.
[3]叶静, 张戌凡. 老年人心理韧性与幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 202-217.
[4]岳童, 黄希庭, 徐颖, 潘思存. 价值观的稳定性与可变性:基于认知神经科学的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2091-2101.
[5]杜健. 自我概念一致性与幸福感间的关系:文化的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1751-1761.
[6]张戌凡, 席猛. 工会实践对员工工作幸福感的影响:基于工具-情感的双路径视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1354-1362.
[7]龚艳萍, 陈卓, 谢菊兰, 谢笑春. 手机冷落行为的前因、后果与作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1258-1267.
[8]傅绪荣, 魏新东, 王予灵, 汪凤炎. 智慧与幸福感的关系:基于多元幸福取向的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 544-556.
[9]余樱, 景奉杰, 杨艳. 怎样花钱更幸福?购买类型对幸福感的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2133-2140.
[10]王轶楠. 自尊稳定性的认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(10): 1724-1733.
[11]丁凤琴, 赵虎英. 感恩的个体主观幸福感更强?—— 一项元分析[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(10): 1749-1763.
[12]晏小华, 刘振亮, 王祥坤, 沐守宽. 幸福悖论及其最新解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(1): 180-189.
[13]杨盈, 耿柳娜, 相鹏, 张晶, 朱丽芳. 自然关联性:概念、测量、功能及干预[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1360-1374.
[14]徐富明, 张慧, 马红宇, 邓颖, 史燕伟, 李欧. 贫困问题:基于心理学的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1431-1440.
[15]杨小莉;刘潇肖;白宝玉. 身高的心理效应及其内在机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(5): 857-865.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5383
相关话题/心理 科学 环境 遗传 生理