) 1苏州大学教育学院, 苏州 215123
2华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院, 上海 200062
收稿日期:2020-06-30出版日期:2021-03-15发布日期:2021-01-26通讯作者:冯成志E-mail:fengchengzhi@suda.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(72072058)Individuals vs groups: Advice-taking in decision making
REN Xiaoyun1, DUAN Jinyun2, FENG Chengzhi1() 1School of Education, Soochow University, Suzhou 21512, China
2School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Received:2020-06-30Online:2021-03-15Published:2021-01-26Contact:FENG Chengzhi E-mail:fengchengzhi@suda.edu.cn摘要/Abstract
摘要： 决策者借助外界的建议通常能够获得更好的决策结果, 但是个体和群体对待建议的态度和行为却不尽相同。基于已有研究, 阐述了个体和群体在建议采纳过程中的特点并分析了造成二者差异的因素, 主要包括二者在面对决策任务和外界建议时的不同表现。此外, 根据群体动力理论, 未来研究可以从群体的动力源因素(凝聚力, 驱动力, 耗散力)来解释和预测群体的建议采纳及其与个体建议采纳的差异, 以期为不同决策情景下决策人员的合理安排和配置提供参考。
图/表 1
图1群体动力理论视角下的决策现象
图1群体动力理论视角下的决策现象参考文献 79
| [1] | 毕鹏程, 席酉民. (2002). 群体决策过程中的群体思维研究. 管理科学学报, 5(1), 28-37. |
| [2] | 曾建华, 何贵兵. (2003). 群体决策中的知识构建过程. 心理科学进展, 11(6), 686-691. |
| [3] | 陈琳, 田晓明, 段锦云. (2019). 建议采纳的认知机制. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 149-159. |
| [4] | 陈婷, 孙晓敏. (2016). 团队决策中的共享信息偏差:基于隐藏文档范式的机制、影响因素探究. 心理科学进展, 24(1), 132-142. |
| [5] | 崔志林. (2019). 群体决策中的“沉默螺旋”现象及应对之策. 领导科学, 5, 29-30. |
| [6] | 段锦云, 古晓花, 孙露莹. (2016). 外显自尊、内隐自尊及其分离对建议采纳的影响. 心理学报, 48(4), 371-384. |
| [7] | 段婧, 刘永芳, 何琪. (2012). 决策者角色及相关变量对风险偏好的影响. 心理学报, 44(3), 369-376. |
| [8] | 李武, 席酉民, 成思危. (2002). 群体决策过程组织研究述评. 管理科学学报, 5(2), 58-69. |
| [9] | 李跃然, 李纾. (2009). 决策者-建议者系统模型的回顾与前瞻. 心理科学进展, 17(5), 1026-1032. |
| [10] | 刘翠翠, 陈彬, 刘磊鑫, 原献学, 汪祚军. (2013). 当局者迷, 旁观者清?自我-他人决策的理性差异及其机制. 心理科学进展, 21(5), 879-885. |
| [11] | 刘永芳, 王鹏, 庄锦英, 钟俊, 孙庆洲, 刘毅. (2014). 自我-他人决策差异: 问题、研究与思考. 心理科学进展, 22(4), 580-587. |
| [12] | 孙露莹, 陈琳, 段锦云. (2017). 决策过程中的建议采纳: 策略、影响及未来展望. 心理科学进展, 25(1), 169-179. |
| [13] | 徐惊蛰, 谢晓非. (2009). 决策过程中的建议采纳. 心理科学进展, 17(5), 1016-1025. |
| [14] | 徐惊蛰, 谢晓非. (2011). 解释水平视角下的自己-他人决策差异. 心理学报, 43(1), 11-20. |
| [15] | 郑全全, 李宏. (2003). 面对面和计算机群体决策在观点产生上的比较. 心理学报, 35(4), 492-498. |
| [16] | 朱月龙, 张开华, 段锦云. (2017). 建议采纳的情绪机制. 心理科学进展, 25(9), 1607-1613. |
| [17] | Armstrong J. S. (2006). How to make better forecasts and decisions: Avoid face-to-face meetings. Foresight, 5(5), 3-15. |
| [18] | Aurelia, M., & Michael, W. M. (2010). An upside to bicultural identity conflict: Resisting groupthink in cultural ingroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1114-1117. |
| [19] | Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 127-151. |
| [20] | Bonner, B. L., & Cadman, B. D. (2014). Group judgment and advice-taking: The social context underlying CEO compensation decisions. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 18(4), 302-317. |
| [21] | Delbecq, A. L., & van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and Program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466-492. |
| [22] | Desivilya, H. S., & Yagil, D. (2005). The role of emotions in conflict management: The case of work teams. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16, 55-69. |
| [23] | de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360-390. |
| [24] | de Wit, F. R. C., Scheepers, D., Ellemers, N., Sassenberg, K., & Scholl, A. (2017). Whether power holders construe their power as responsibility or opportunity influences their tendency to take advice from others. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 923-949. |
| [25] | Duan, J. Y., Xia, X. T., & van Swol, L. M., (2018). Emoticons' influence on advice taking. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 53-58. |
| [26] | Effron, D. A., & Knowles, E. D. (2015). Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 234-253. URLpmid: 25603374 |
| [27] | Emich, K. J. (2012). How expectancy motivation influences information exchange in small groups. Small Group Research, 43(3), 275-294. |
| [28] | Gino, F., & Moore, D. A. (2007). Effects of task difficulty on use of advice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(1), 21-35. |
| [29] | Goncalo, J. A., Polman, E., & Maslach, C. (2010). Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(1), 13-24. |
| [30] | Harvey, N., Harries, C., & Fischer, I. (2000). Using advice and assessing its quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81(2), 252-273. |
| [31] | Hogarth R. M. (1978). A note on aggregating opinions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21(1), 40-46. |
| [32] | Hütter, M., & Fiedler, K. (2019). Advice taking under uncertainty: The impact of genuine advice versus arbitrary anchors on judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103829. |
| [33] | Jans, L., Leach, C. W., Garcia, R. L., & Postmes, T. (2015). The development of group influence on in-group identification: A multilevel approach. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18(2), 190-209. |
| [34] | Kane, A. A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 56-71. |
| [35] | Kappes, A., Harvey, A. H., Lohrenz, T., Montague, P. R., & Sharot, T. (2020). Confirmation bias in the utilization of others’ opinion strength . Nature Neuroscience, 23, 130-137. URLpmid: 31844311 |
| [36] | Kenny, D. A., Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., Livi, S., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). The statistical analysis of data from small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 126-137. URLpmid: 12088122 |
| [37] | Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 623-655. |
| [38] | Kim, H. Y., Lee, Y. S., & Jun, D. B. (2019). Individual and group advice taking in judgmental forecasting: Is group forecasting superior to individual forecasting? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(3), 287-303. |
| [39] | Koehler, D. J., & Beauregard, T. A. (2006). Illusion of confirmation from exposure to another's hypothesis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(1), 61-78. |
| [40] | Kray L. J. (2000). Contingent weighting in self-other decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 82-106. |
| [41] | Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: ii. Channels of group life; Social planning and action research. Human Relations, 1(2), 143-153. |
| [42] | Mannes, A. E., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2014). The wisdom of select crowds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(2), 276-299. URLpmid: 25090129 |
| [43] | Mcgarty, C., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., & Haslam, S. A. (1993). The creation of uncertainty in the influence process: The roles of stimulus information and disagreement with similar others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 17-38. |
| [44] | Minson, J. A., Liberman, V., & Ross, L. (2011). Two to tango: Effects of collaboration and disagreement on dyadic judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(10), 1325-1338. URLpmid: 21632960 |
| [45] | Minson, J. A., & Mueller, J. S. (2012). The cost of collaboration: Why joint decision making exacerbates rejection of outside information. Psychological Science, 23(3), 219-224. |
| [46] | Minson, J. A., & Mueller, J. S. (2013). Groups weight outside information less than individuals do, although they shouldn’t: Response to Schultze, Mojzisch, and Schulz- Hardt (2013). Psychological Science, 24(7), 1373-1374. |
| [47] | Minson, J. A., Mueller, J. S., & Larrick, R. P. (2018). The contingent wisdom of dyads: When discussion enhances vs. undermines the accuracy of collaborative judgments. Management Science, 64(9), 4177-4192. |
| [48] | Nijstad, B. A., & de Dreu, C. K. (2012). Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 87-111. |
| [49] | Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 918-930. |
| [50] | Rader, C. A., Larrick, R. P., & Soll, J. B. (2017). Advice as a form of social influence: Informational motives and the consequences for accuracy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), e12329. |
| [51] | Rader, C. A., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2015). Pushing away from representative advice: Advice taking, anchoring, and adjustment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 130, 26-43. |
| [52] | Scholten, L., van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B. A., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 539-552. |
| [53] | Schultze, T., Gerlach, T. M., & Rittich, J. C. (2018). Some people heed advice less than others: Agency (but not communion) predicts advice taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 31(3), 430-445. |
| [54] | Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2013). Groups weight outside information less because they should: Reply to Minson and Mueller (2012). Psychological Science, 24(7), 1373-1374. URLpmid: 23640063 |
| [55] | Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2017). On the inability to ignore useless advice: A case for anchoring in the judge-advisor-system. Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 170-183. |
| [56] | Schultze, T., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2019). Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(3), 349-363. |
| [57] | Schultze, T., Rakotoarisoa, A.-F., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2015). Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(2), 144-171. |
| [58] | Schulze, C., & Newell, B. R. (2016). More heads choose better than one: Group decision making can eliminate probability matching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(3), 907-914. |
| [59] | See, K. E., Morrison, E. W., Rothman, N. B., & Soll, J. B. (2011). The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 272-285. |
| [60] | Simmons, J. P., Leboeuf, R. A., & Nelson, L. D. (2010). The effect of accuracy motivation on anchoring and adjustment: Do people adjust from provided anchors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(6), 917-932. URLpmid: 21114351 |
| [61] | Smith, C. M., Tindale, R. S., & Anderson, E. M. (2001). The impact of shared representations on minority influence in freely interacting groups. In C. K. W. de Dreu & N. K. de Vries (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation(pp. 183-200). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. |
| [62] | Sniezek, J. A., & Buckley, T. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 159-174. |
| [63] | Sniezek, J. A., & van Swol, L. M. (2001). Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(2), 288-307. |
| [64] | Stern, A., Schultze, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2017). How much group is necessary? Group-to-individual transfer in estimation tasks. Collabra: Psychology, 3(1), 1-17. |
| [65] | Stewart, T. R., Mumpower, J. L., & Holzworth, R. J. (2012). Learning to make selection and detection decisions: The roles of base rate and feedback. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(5), 522-533. |
| [66] | Stone, E. R., Choi, Y. S., de Bruin, W. B., & Mandel, D. R. (2013). I can take the risk, but you should be safe: Self-other differences in situations involving physical safety. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 250-267. |
| [67] | Stone, E. R., Yates, A. J., & Caruthers, A. S. (2002). Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(9), 1797-1824. |
| [68] | Super, J. F., Li, P., Ishqaidef, G., & Guthrie, J. P. (2016). Group rewards, group composition and information sharing: A motivated information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 134, 31-44. |
| [69] | Toma, C., Vasiljevic, D., Oberlé, D., & Butera, F. (2013). Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(1), 161-172. |
| [70] | Tost, L. P., Gino, F., & Larrick, R. P. (2012). Power, competitiveness, and advice taking: Why the powerful don’t listen. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 53-65. |
| [71] | Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463. URLpmid: 20438233 |
| [72] | Tzioti, S. C., Wierenga, B., & van Osselaer, S. M. J., (2014). The effect of intuitive advice justification on advice taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(1), 66-77. |
| [73] | Waytz, A., & Liane, Y. (2016). The group-member mind trade-off: Attributing mind to groups versus group members. Psychological Science, 23(1), 77-85. URLpmid: 22157677 |
| [74] | Xu, E., Huang, X., Ouyang, K., Liu, W., & Hu, S. (2019). Tactics of speaking up: The roles of issue importance, perceived managerial openness, and managers’ positive mood. Human Resource Management, 59(3), 1-15. |
| [75] | Yaniv, I. (2004). Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93(1), 1-13. |
| [76] | Yaniv, I., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2012). Exploiting the wisdom of others to make better decisions: Suspending judgment reduces egocentrism and increases accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(5), 427-434. |
| [77] | Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(2), 260-281. URLpmid: 11056071 |
| [78] | Zaleskiewicz, T., & Gasiorowska, A. (2018). Tell me what I wanted to hear: Confirmation effect in lay evaluations of financial expert authority. Applied Psychology, 67(4), 686-722. doi: 10.1111/apps.v67.4URL |
| [79] | Zarnoth, P., & Sniezek, J. A. (1997). The social influence of confidence in group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 345-366. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1326URLpmid: 9247369 |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 王晓田, 王娜, 何金波. 前瞻性情绪作为社会风险的信息源假说：公共场景下风险决策的情绪及文化机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 959-966. |
| [2] | 包寒吴霜, 蔡华俭. 姓名对个体心理与行为的实际影响：证据和理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 1067-1085. |
| [3] | 冯廷勇, 王雪珂, 苏缇. 拖延行为的发展认知机制及神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 586-596. |
| [4] | 杨玲, 刘文鑫, 张炀, 张建勋, 牛禄霖. 物质成瘾领域延迟折扣研究中的外部效度问题[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 140-149. |
| [5] | 黄龙, 徐富明, 胡笑羽. 眼动轨迹匹配法：一种研究决策过程的新方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1454-1461. |
| [6] | 张银花, 李红, 吴寅. 计算模型在道德认知研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1042-1055. |
| [7] | 徐富明, 黄龙, 张慧, 相鹏, 刘腾飞, 李亚红. 行为贫困陷阱的心理机制与管理对策：基于认知与动机双视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 681-691. |
| [8] | 李庆功, 王震炎, 孙捷元, 师妍. 网约车场景中声誉和面孔可信度对女性信任判断的影响以及直觉性思维的调节作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 746-751. |
| [9] | 张紫琦, 贺则宇, 罗文波, 伍海燕. 元认知中自信心对联合决策的预测作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 604-611. |
| [10] | 何清华, 李丹丹. 中国儿童青少年跨期决策的发展与脑发育机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(3): 381-389. |
| [11] | 徐科朋, 杨凌倩, 吴家虹, 薛宏, 张姝玥. CNI模型在道德决策研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2102-2113. |
| [12] | 彭嘉熙, 赵鹿鸣, 方鹏, 曹云飞, 苗丹民, 肖玮. 睡眠剥夺对风险决策的影响机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1789-1799. |
| [13] | 马钰, 肖晨洁, 车敬上, 王海侠, 李爱梅. 自我损耗降低决策理性:心理机制与边界条件[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1911-1925. |
| [14] | 吴小菊, 陈俊芳, 符佳慧, 李纾, 梁竹苑. 健康领域的跨期决策与健康行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1926-1938. |
| [15] | 陈银芳, 谢家全, 杨文登. 味觉对判断与决策的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1678-1687. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5389
