1江西师范大学心理学院, 南昌 330022
2皖南医学院人文与管理学院, 芜湖 341002
3南宁师范大学教育科学学院, 南宁 530299
收稿日期:
2019-04-09出版日期:
2020-09-15发布日期:
2020-07-24通讯作者:
徐富明,胡笑羽E-mail:fumingxu@126.com;daisyxy@126.com基金资助:
* 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71971103);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(20YJC190006);安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目(AHSKQ2019D059);安徽省教育厅高校科学研究重点项目(SK2018A0192)Scanmatch: A new method for studying decision-making process
HUANG Long1,2, XU Fu-ming3(), HU Xiao-yu1()1School of Psychology, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330022, China
2School of Humanities and Management, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 341002, China
3School of Education Science, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530299, China
Received:
2019-04-09Online:
2020-09-15Published:
2020-07-24Contact:
XU Fu-ming,HU Xiao-yu E-mail:fumingxu@126.com;daisyxy@126.com摘要/Abstract
摘要: 眼动轨迹匹配法是近年来新兴的一种眼动数据分析方法, 该方法包括注视数据的预处理、兴趣区划分和编码、形成眼动轨迹字符串、计算相似性得分四个步骤。研究者采用眼动轨迹匹配法对决策过程理论及其影响因素进行的探索性研究, 证实了眼动轨迹匹配法在决策领域的可行性、精确性和高价值性。未来的研究应进一步利用眼动轨迹匹配法加强对各种决策理论及其影响因素的研究, 以揭示决策的认知过程, 构建更加完善的决策理论模型。
图/表 3
图1一项风险决策任务中的眼动轨迹、ROI和注视时间 注:箭头方向代表眼动轨迹的方向, 方框代表ROI, 基础注视时间为50 ms
图1一项风险决策任务中的眼动轨迹、ROI和注视时间 注:箭头方向代表眼动轨迹的方向, 方框代表ROI, 基础注视时间为50 ms
图2替换矩阵举例(资料来自Cristino et al., 2010)
图2替换矩阵举例(资料来自Cristino et al., 2010)
图3间隙惩罚和相似性得分计算举例(资料改自Cristino et al., 2010)
图3间隙惩罚和相似性得分计算举例(资料改自Cristino et al., 2010)
参考文献 44
[1] | 陈丽君, 郑雪. (2014). 大学生问题发现过程的眼动研究. 心理学报, 46(3), 367-384. |
[2] | 陈庆荣, 周曦, 韩静, 安静. (2012). 眼球追踪: 模式、技术和应用. 实验室研究与探索, 31(10), 10-15. |
[3] | 王福兴, 侯秀娟, 段朝辉, 刘华山, 李卉. (2016). 中国象棋经验棋手与新手的知觉差异:来自眼动的证据. 心理学报, 48(5), 457-471. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00457URL |
[4] | 魏子晗, 李兴珊. (2015). 决策过程的追踪: 基于眼动的证据. 心理科学进展, 23(12), 2029-2041. |
[5] | 闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605. |
[6] | 张阳阳, 饶俪琳, 梁竹苑, 周媛, 李纾. (2014). 风险决策过程验证: 补偿/非补偿模型之争的新认识与新证据. 心理科学进展, 22(2), 205-219. |
[7] | 周蕾, 李爱梅, 张磊, 李纾, 梁竹苑. (2019). 风险决策和跨期决策的过程比较: 以确定效应和即刻效应为例. 心理学报, 51(3), 73-88. |
[8] | Brandst?tter, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113(2), 409-432. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409URLpmid: 16637767 |
[9] | Cristino, F., Math?t, S., Theeuwes, J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2010). Scanmatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 692-700. URLpmid: 20805591 |
[10] | Day, R. F. (2010). Examining the validity of the Needleman- Wunsch algorithm in identifying decision strategy with eye-movement data. Decision Support Systems, 49(4), 396-403. |
[11] | Dewhurst, R., Nystr?m, M., Jarodzka, H., Foulsham, T., Johansson, R., & Holmqvist, K. (2012, May). The effect of task difficulty on eye movement sequences in multiple dimensions. Paper presented at the meeting of the Scandinavian Workshop on Applied Eye Tracking, Stockholm, Sweden. |
[12] | Eraslan, S., Yesilada, Y., & Harper, S. (2015). Eye Tracking Scanpath Analysis Techniques on Web Pages: A Survey, Evaluation and Comparison. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(1), 1-19. |
[13] | Follet, B., Meur, O. L., & Baccino, T. (2011). New insights into ambient and focal visual fixations using an automatic classification algorithm. i-Perception, 2(6), 592-610. URLpmid: 23145248 |
[14] | Gbadamosi, J., & Zangemeister, W. H. (2001). Visual imagery in hemianopic patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(7), 855-866. doi: 10.1162/089892901753165782URL |
[15] | Gleichgerrcht, E., Ibá?ez, A., Roca, M., Torralva, T., & Manes, F. (2010). Decision-making cognition in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature Reviews Neurology, 6(11), 611-623. URLpmid: 21045795 |
[16] | Gl?ckner, A., & Herbold, A. K. (2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(1), 71-98. doi: 10.1002/bdm.v24.1URL |
[17] | Isen, A. M., & Patrick, R. (1983). The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: When the chips are down. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31(2), 194-202. |
[18] | Johnson, E. J., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Willemsen, M. C. (2008). Process models deserve process data: A comment on Brandst?tter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig 2008. Psychological Review, 115(1), 263-273. URLpmid: 18211202 |
[19] | Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329-354. URLpmid: 7413885 |
[20] | Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. |
[21] | Khedher, A. B., Jraidi, I., & Frasson, C. (2018). Local sequence alignment for scan path similarity assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(7), 482-490. |
[22] | Król, M., & Król, E. M. (2019). Learning from peers’ eye movements in the absence of expert guidance: A proof of concept using laboratory stock trading, eye tracking, and machine learning. Cognitive Science, 43(2), e12716. URLpmid: 30803012 |
[23] | Li, S. (2004). A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters. Applied Intelligence, 20(2), 147-163. |
[24] | Madsen, A., Larson, A., Loschky, L., & Rebello, N. S. (2012, March). Using ScanMatch scores to understand differences in eye movements between correct and incorrect solvers on physics problems. Symposium conducted at the meeting of Eye Tracking Research and Applications, New York, USA. |
[25] | Markov, A. (1971). Extension of the limit theorems of probability theory to a sum of variables connected in a chain. In Dynamic Probabilistic Systems: Vol. I. Markov models (pp. 552-577). New York: Wiley |
[26] | Math?t, S., Cristino, F., Gilchrist, I. D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). A simple way to estimate similarity between pairs of eye movement sequences. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(1), 1-15. |
[27] | Noton, D., & Stark, L. (1971). Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science, 171(3968), 308-311. URLpmid: 5538847 |
[28] | Nuthmann, A., & Kliegl, R. (2009). An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 1-28. URLpmid: 19757890 |
[29] | Pascal, B. (1660). Pensées (Trotter, W. F. Trans). Retrieved Nov 22, 2018, from https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/ 1660pascal-pensees.asp |
[30] | Ponsoda, V., Scott, D., & Findlay, J. M. (1995). A probability vector and transition matrix analysis of eye movements during visual search. Acta Psychologica, 88(2), 167-185. URLpmid: 7740968 |
[31] | Rogers, R. D. (2011). The roles of dopamine and serotonin in decision making: Evidence from pharmacological experiments in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36(1), 114-132. URLpmid: 20881944 |
[32] | Schoemann, M., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Renkewitz, F., & Scherbaum, S. (2019). Forward inference in risky choice: Mapping gaze and decision processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(5), 521-535. |
[33] | Sperati, D. C. (2003). The inner working of dynamic visuo-spatial imagery as revealed by spontaneous eye movements. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eyes: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 119-142). Oxford: Elsevier Science. |
[34] | Stewart, N., Hermens, F., & Matthews, W. J. (2016). Eye movements in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(2-3), 116-136. URLpmid: 27522985 |
[35] | Su, Y., Rao, L. L., Sun, H. Y., Du, X. L., Li, X., & Li, S. (2013). Is making a risky choice based on a weighting and adding process? An eye-tracking investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1765-1780. URLpmid: 23687917 |
[36] | Sun, H. Y., Rao, L. L., Zhou, K., & Li, S. (2014). Formulating an emergency plan based on expectation- maximization is one thing, but applying it to a single case is another. Journal of Risk Research, 17(7), 785-814. |
[37] | Suter, R. S., Pachur, T., & Hertwig, R. (2016). How affect shapes risky choice: Distorted probability weighting versus probability neglect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(4), 437-449. |
[38] | Takeuchi, H., & Matsuda, N. (2012, November). Scan-path analysis by the string-edit method considering fixation duration. Paper presented at the meeting of the joint 6th international conference on soft computing and intelligent systems (SCIS) and 13th international symposium on advanced intelligent systems (ISIS), Kobe, Japan |
[39] | Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876-889. URLpmid: 11138758 |
[40] | Underwood, G., Humphrey, K., & Foulsham, T. (2008). Knowledge-based patterns of remembering: Eye movement scanpaths reflect domain experience. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5298, 125-144. |
[41] | Velichkovsky, B. M., Rothert, A., Kopf, M., Dornh?fer, S. M., & Joos, M. (2002). Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5(2), 145-156. |
[42] | Zhou, L., Zhang, Y. Y., Li, S., & Liang, Z. Y. (2018). New paradigms for the old question: Challenging the expectation rule held by risky decision-making theories. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12, e17. |
[43] | Zhou, L., Zhang, Y. Y., Wang, Z. J., Rao, L. L., Wang, W., Li, S., … Liang, Z. Y. (2016). A scanpath analysis of the risky decision-making process. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(2-3), 169-182. |
[44] | Zhou, X. (2014). New metrics and measurement for information acquisition in decision making (Unpublished master’s thesis). Miami University. |
相关文章 6
[1] | 李晓明, 蒋松源. 权力对延迟选择的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 447-452. |
[2] | 魏子晗, 李兴珊. 决策过程的追踪:基于眼动的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(12): 2029-2041. |
[3] | 张阳阳;饶俪琳;梁竹苑;周媛;李纾. 风险决策过程验证:补偿/非补偿模型之争的新认识与新证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(2): 205-219. |
[4] | 余雯;闫巩固;黄志华. 决策中的过程追踪技术:介绍与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(4): 606-614. |
[5] | 张茉,陈毅文. 产品类别与网上购物决策过程的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(3): 433-437. |
[6] | 吴迪;舒华. 眼动技术在阅读研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2001, 9(4): 319-324. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5145