删除或更新信息，请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

语义认知的习得、发展和老化及其神经机制

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01
程士静, 何文广()
曲阜师范大学教育学院, 山东 曲阜 273165
收稿日期:2019-08-19出版日期:2020-07-15发布日期:2020-05-21
通讯作者:何文广E-mail:hewenguang1022@163.com

基金资助:* 国家社科基金资助(18BYY092)

The acquisition, development and aging of semantic cognition and related neural mechanism

CHENG Shijing, HE Wenguang()
School of Educational, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China
Received:2019-08-19Online:2020-07-15Published:2020-05-21
Contact:HE Wenguang E-mail:hewenguang1022@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要： 作为语言系统的重要组成部分, 探究语义认知发展机制及其神经机理对揭示人类语言发展、认知机制有着重要意义。以语义认知能力的习得、发展、老化认知机制为主线, 在系统阐释词汇-语义系统的习得、语义认知能力和策略发展的基础上, 进一步探讨了语义认知老化的认知机制及其神经机理。最后, 围绕儿童和成人的语义认知差异、句法和语义认知老化的差异、语义认知老化的影响因素等问题上进行了思考和展望。


[1] 官群, 赵建蓉, 姚茹. (2018). 语言习得的统计学习探究——来自普通人群和特殊人群的证据. 中国特殊教育, (3), 78-82.
[2] 桂诗春. (2000). 新编心理语言学. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社.
[3] 何文广. (2017). 语言认知老化机制及其神经基础. 心理科学进展, 25(9), 1479-491.
[4] 胡云霄. (2017). 老年人教育背景、年龄对言语流畅性的影响 (博士学位论文). 吉林大学, 长春.
[5] 兰丽珍. (2016). 汉语词汇习得年龄效应的机制探讨. 淮海工学院学报(人文社会科学版), 14(1), 54-57.
[6] 马菊青. (2005-03-16). 儿童语言习得过程中语义发展规律研究. 青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (5), 106-109.
[7] 秦春秀, 祝婷, 赵捧未, 张毅. (2014). 自然语言语义分析研究进展. 图书情报工作, 58(22), 130-137.
[8] 王德春. (2006). 语言学通论(修订版) . 北京: 北京大学出版社.
[9] 许振国. (2011). 语义加工中汉语概念特征的差异性效应 (博士学位论文). 河南大学, 开封.
[10] Alatorre-Cruz, G. C., Silva-Pereyra, J., Fernández, T., Rodríguez-Camacho, M. A., Castro-Chavira, S. A., & Sanchez-Lopez, J. (2018). Effects of age and working memory load on syntactic processing: An event-related potential study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 185.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00185URLpmid: 29780314
[11] Alt, M., Meyers, C., Oglivie, T., Nicholas, K., & Arizmendi, G. (2014). Cross-situational statistically based word learning intervention for late-talking toddlers. Journal of Communication Disorders, 52(1), 207-220.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.07.002URL
[12] Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K. (2009). Lexical-semantic priming effects during infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3633-3647.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0146URL
[13] Arias-Trejo, N., & Plunkett, K. (2013). What's in a link: Associative and taxonomic priming effects in the infant lexicon. Cognition, 128(2), 214-227.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.008URL
[14] Baciu, M., Boudiaf, N., Cousin, E., Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Pichat, C., Fournet, N., … Krainik, A. (2016). Functional MRI evidence for the decline of word retrieval and generation during normal aging. Age, 38(1), 1-22.
URLpmid: 26695510
[15] Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2002). Semantic retrieval, mnemonic control, and prefrontal cortex. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1(3), 206-218.
doi: 10.1177/1534582302001003002URLpmid: 17715593
[16] Balsamo, L. M., Xu, B., & Gaillard, W. D. (2006). Language lateralization and the role of the fusiform gyrus in semantic processing in young children. NeuroImage, 31(3), 1306-1314.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.027URLpmid: 16545581
[17] Benau, E. M., Morris, J., & Couperus, J. W. (2011). Semantic processing in children and adults: Incongruity and the N400. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40(3), 225-239.
doi: 10.1007/s10936-011-9167-1URL
[18] Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Cox, R. W., Rao, S. M., & Prieto, T. (1997). Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17(1), 353-362.
URLpmid: 8987760
[19] Booth, J. R., Lu, D., Burman, D. D., Chou, T.-L., Jin, Z., Peng, D. L., … Liu, L. (2006). Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading . Brain Research, 1071(1), 197-207.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.097URLpmid: 16427033
[20] Boudiaf, N., Laboissière, R., Cousin, é., Fournet, N., Krainik, A., & Baciu, M. (2018). Behavioral evidence for a differential modulation of semantic processing and lexical production by aging: A full linear mixed-effects modeling approach. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(1), 1-22.
doi: 10.1080/13825585.2016.1257100URL
[21] Caplan, D., Dede, G., Waters, G., Michaud, J., & Tripodis, Y. (2011). Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 439-450.
doi: 10.1037/a0021837URL
[22] Cheour, M., Martynova, O., N??t?nen, R., Erkkola, R., Sillanp??, M., Kero, P., … H?m?l?inen, H. (2002). Psychobiology: Speech sounds learned by sleeping newborns. Nature, 415(6872), 599-600.
doi: 10.1038/415599aURLpmid: 11832929
[23] Chou, T.-L., Booth, J. R., Bitan, T., Burman, D. D., Bigio, J. D., Cone, N. E., … Cao, F. (2010). Developmental and skill effects on the neural correlates of semantic processing to visually presented words. Human Brain Mapping, 27(11), 915-924.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20231URLpmid: 16575838
[24] Chou, T.-L., Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., Bigio, J. D., Lu, D., & Cone, N. (2006). Developmental changes in the neural correlates of semantic processing. NeuroImage, 29(4), 1141-1149.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.064URLpmid: 16275017
[25] Chow, J., Davies, A. A., & Plunkett, K. (2017). Spoken-word recognition in 2-year-olds: The tug of war between phonological and semantic activation. Journal of Memory & Language, 93, 104-134.
[26] Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A. D., Smith, E. E., & Swinney, D. (2007). Lateral inferotemporal cortex maintains conceptual- semantic representations in verbal working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(12), 2035-2049.
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2035URLpmid: 17892385
[27] Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Phonotactic knowledge and lexical-semantic processing in one-year- olds: Brain responses to words and nonsense words in picture contexts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(11), 1785-1802.
doi: 10.1162/089892905774589172URLpmid: 16269114
[28] Harley, T. A., Oliver, T. M., Jessiman, L. J., & Macandrew, S. B. G . (2013). Ageing makes us dyslexic. Aphasiology, 27(4), 490-505.
doi: 10.1080/02687038.2013.775564URL
[29] Hoffman, P. (2018). An individual differences approach to semantic cognition: Divergent effects of age on representation, retrieval and selection. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 8145-8158.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26569-0URLpmid: 29802344
[30] Hoffman, P. (2019). Divergent effects of healthy ageing on semantic knowledge and control: Evidence from novel comparisons with semantically impaired patients. Journal of Neuropsychology, 13(3), 462-484.
doi: 10.1111/jnp.12159URLpmid: 29667366
[31] Hoffman, P., Mcclelland, J. L., & Ralph, M. A. L . (2018). Concepts, control, and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition. Psychological Review, 125(3), 293-328.
doi: 10.1037/rev0000094URLpmid: 29733663
[32] Hoffman, P., & Morcom, A. M. (2018). Age-related changes in the neural networks supporting semantic cognition: A meta-analysis of 47 functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 84, 134-150.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.010URLpmid: 29183684
[33] Hoffman, P., & Woollams, A. M. (2015). Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 41(2), 385-402.
doi: 10.1037/a0038995URLpmid: 25751041
[34] Jefferies, E. (2013). The neural basis of semantic cognition: Converging evidence from neuropsychology, neuroimaging and tms. Cortex, 49(3), 611-625.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.10.008URL
[35] Kavé, G., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Lifespan development of phonemic and semantic fluency: Universal increase, differential decrease. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 37(7), 751-763.
doi: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1065958URLpmid: 26299188
[36] Lacombe, J., Jolicoeur, P., Grimault, S., Pineault, J., & Joubert, S. (2015). Neural changes associated with semantic processing in healthy aging despite intact behavioral performance. Brain & Language, 149, 118-127.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.003URLpmid: 26282079
[37] Laver, G. D. (2009). Adult aging effects on semantic and episodic priming in word recognition. Psychology & Aging, 24(1), 28-39.
doi: 10.1037/a0014642URLpmid: 19290735
[38] Payne, B. R., & Federmeier, K. D. (2018). Contextual constraints on lexico-semantic processing in aging: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1687, 117-128.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.02.021URLpmid: 29462609
[39] Pexman, P. M., & Yap, M. J. (2018). Individual differences in semantic processing: Insights from the calgary semantic decision project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(7), 1091-1112.
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000499URLpmid: 29481104
[40] Poulisse, C., Wheeldon, L., & Segaert, K. (2019). Evidence against preserved syntactic comprehension in healthy aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(12), 2290-2308.
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000707URLpmid: 30998075
[41] Ralph, M. A. L., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(1), 42-55.
doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150URLpmid: 27881854
[42] R?m?, P., Sirri, L., & Goyet, L. (2018). Event-related potentials associated with cognitive mechanisms underlying lexical- semantic processing in monolingual and bilingual 18- month-old children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 47, 123-130.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.04.012URL
[43] R?m?, P., Sirri, L., & Serres, J. (2013). Development of lexical-semantic language system: N400 priming effect for spoken words in 18- and 24-month old children. Brain & Language, 125(1), 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.009URLpmid: 23435193
[44] Rayner, K., Yang, J., Schuett, S., & Slattery, T. J. (2013). Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading unspaced text. Experimental Psychology, 60(5), 354-361.
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000207URLpmid: 23681016
[45] Reid, V. M., Hoehl, S., Grigutsch, M., Groendahl, A., Parise, E., & Striano, T. (2009). The neural correlates of infant and adult goal prediction: Evidence for semantic processing systems. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 620-629.
doi: 10.1037/a0015209URLpmid: 19413420
[46] Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory & Language, 35(4), 606-621.
[47] Shafto, M. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346(6209), 583-587.
doi: 10.1126/science.1254404URLpmid: 25359966
[48] Smith, L., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3), 1558-1568.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.010URLpmid: 17692305
[49] Vassileiou, B., Meyer, L., Beese, C., & Friederici, A. D. (2018). Alignment of alpha-band desynchronization with syntactic structure predicts successful sentence comprehension. Neuroimage, 175, 286-296.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.008URLpmid: 29627592
[50] Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta- analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 332-339.
doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.332URLpmid: 12825780
[51] von koss Torkildsen, J., Syversen, G., Simonsen, H. G., Moen, I., & Lindgren, M. (2007). Electrophysiological correlates of auditory semantic priming in 24-month-olds. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 20(4), 332-351.
doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.02.003URL
[52] Wells, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., Race, D. S., Acheson, D. J., & Macdonald, M. C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58(2), 250-271.
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.08.002URLpmid: 18922516
[53] Wierenga, C. E., Benjamin, M., Gopinath, K., Perlstein, W. M., Leonard, C. M., Rothi, L. J. G., … Crosson, B. (2008). Age-related changes in word retrieval: Role of bilateral frontal and subcortical networks. Neurobiology of Aging, 29(3), 436-451.
doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.10.024URLpmid: 17147975
[54] Yee, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1015-1027.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7URLpmid: 27282993




[1]王琳, 王志丹, 王泓婧. 孤独症儿童动作发展障碍的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1239-1250.
[2]张照, 张力为, 龚然. 视觉工作记忆的过滤效能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 635-651.
[3]周爱保, 胡砚冰, 周滢鑫, 李玉, 李文一, 张号博, 郭彦麟, 胡国庆. 听而不“闻”?人声失认症的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 414-424.
[4]赵小红, 童薇, 陈桃林, 吴冬梅, 张蕾, 陈正举, 方晓义, 龚启勇, 唐小蓉. 敬畏的心理模型及其认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 520-530.
[5]魏真瑜, 邓湘树, 赵治瀛. 亲社会行为中的从众效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 531-539.
[6]岳童, 黄希庭, 傅安国. 人们何以能够“舍生取义”?基于保护性价值观认知神经机制的解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(3): 540-548.
[7]王葛彤, 席洁, 陈霓虹, 黄昌兵. 双眼视差的神经机制与知觉学习效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 56-69.
[8]郭滢, 龚先旻, 王大华. 错误记忆产生的认知与神经机制：信息加工视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 79-92.
[9]刘启鹏, 赵小云, 王翠艳, 徐艺雅, 王淑燕. 反刍思维与注意脱离损坏的关系及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 102-111.
[10]翁纯纯, 王宁. 时距知觉的动物研究范式及相关神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1478-1492.
[11]杨晓梦, 王福兴, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 高春颍, 胡祥恩. 瞳孔是心灵的窗口吗?——瞳孔在心理学研究中的应用及测量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1029-1041.
[12]张晶晶, 梁啸岳, 陈伊笛, 陈庆荣. 音乐句法加工的认知机制与音乐结构的影响模式[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 883-892.
[13]杨国春, 伍海燕, 齐玥, 刘勋. 人类性别加工的认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2008-2017.
[14]李灵, 侯晓旭, 张亚, 隋雪. 食物线索注意偏向及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2040-2051.
[15]岳童, 黄希庭, 徐颖, 潘思存. 价值观的稳定性与可变性：基于认知神经科学的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2091-2101.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5109
相关话题/心理 科学 神经 语言 系统
  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效，10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材，产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频，无论您是考研复习、考证刷题，还是考前冲刺等，不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    考试优惠券 本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 心理治疗中的脱落
    何姣1,白宝玉2(),夏勉31武汉大学学生工作部大学生心理健康教育中心2武汉大学哲学学院心理学系,武汉4300723华中师范大学心理学院,武汉430079收稿日期:2019-09-30出版日期:2020-07-15发布日期:2020-05-21通讯作者:白宝玉E-mail:psy_bby@163.c ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 视觉语言对听觉障碍人群阅读能力的影响及作用机制
    赵英,伍新春(),谢瑞波,冯杰,孙鹏,陈红君北京师范大学心理学部,应用实验心理北京市重点实验室,儿童阅读与学习研究中心,北京100875收稿日期:2019-06-10出版日期:2020-06-15发布日期:2020-04-22通讯作者:伍新春E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 慈悲冥想对利他行为的影响及其认知神经机制
    金国敏,李丹()上海师范大学心理学系,上海200234收稿日期:2019-09-05出版日期:2020-06-15发布日期:2020-04-22通讯作者:李丹E-mail:lidan501@126.com基金资助:*上海市教委科研创新计划重大项目(2019-01-07-00-02-E00005)Th ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 行为贫困陷阱的心理机制与管理对策：基于认知与动机双视角
    徐富明1,黄龙2,3(),张慧4,相鹏5(),刘腾飞6,李亚红71南宁师范大学教育科学学院,南宁5302992皖南医学院人文与管理学院,芜湖3410023江西师范大学心理学院,南昌3300224华中科技大学社会学院,武汉4300745南京财经大学法学院,南京2100236广东医科大学人文与管理学院, ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人声加工的神经机制
    伍可1,2,陈杰1,2(),李雯婕1,2,陈洁佳1,2,刘雷3,刘翠红1,21湖南师范大学教育科学学院2湖南师范大学认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室,长沙4100813北京大学心理与认知科学学院,北京100080收稿日期:2019-07-11出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 老年人视听觉整合的影响因素及其神经机制
    杨伟平1,3(),李胜楠1,李子默1,郭敖1,任艳娜2()1湖北大学教育学院心理学系,武汉4300622贵州中医药大学人文与管理学院心理学教研室,贵阳5500253湖北大学教育学院脑与认知研究中心,武汉430062收稿日期:2019-08-13出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03- ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言功能偏侧化及其与利手、功能连接的关系
    王潇,吴国榕(),吴欣然,邱江,陈红西南大学心理学部,认知与人格教育部重点实验室,重庆400715收稿日期:2019-04-12出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27基金资助:&国家自然科学基金项目(61876156)Languagelateralization ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 信任的认知神经网络模型
    陈瀛,徐敏霞,汪新建()南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系,天津300350收稿日期:2019-09-20出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27通讯作者:汪新建E-mail:wangxj@nankai.edu.cn基金资助:&教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 稀缺对个体心理和行为的影响：基于一个更加整合视角下的阐释
    雷亮(),王菁煜,柳武妹兰州大学管理学院,兰州730000收稿日期:2019-05-13出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27通讯作者:雷亮E-mail:leil@lzu.edu.cn基金资助:&国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972092);国家自然科学基金重点 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 空间频率影响恐惧面孔表情加工的神经通路
    贺则宇,张紫琦,李可轩,何蔚祺()辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心,大连116029收稿日期:2019-06-20出版日期:2020-04-15发布日期:2020-02-24通讯作者:何蔚祺E-mail:weiqi79920686@sina.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(319709 ...
    中科院心理研究所 本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01

Free考研考试FreeKaoYan.Com
欢迎来到Free考研考试，"为实现人生的Free而奋斗"

© 2020 FreeKaoYan! . All rights reserved.