删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

面孔识别的自我群体偏向

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

温芳芳, 佐斌(), 马书瀚, 谢志杰
华中师范大学心理学院·社会心理研究中心, 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079
收稿日期:2019-04-04出版日期:2020-07-15发布日期:2020-05-21
通讯作者:佐斌E-mail:zuobin@mail.ccnu.edu.cn

基金资助:* 国家社科基金重大项目(18ZDA331);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CCNU19ZN021)

Own-group bias in face recognition

WEN Fangfang, ZUO Bin(), MA Shuhan, XIE Zhijie
School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Social Psychology, Central China Normal University, Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China
Received:2019-04-04Online:2020-07-15Published:2020-05-21
Contact:ZUO Bin E-mail:zuobin@mail.ccnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 面孔认知研究表明, 人们识别和再认自己所属群体(如种族、性别、年龄)面孔的成绩显著好于识别其他群体面孔的成绩。近年来围绕面孔识别的这种自我群体偏向进行了实验研究, 研究者提出了知觉经验说和社会认知论两种理论来解释其认知加工机制, 而类别化-个性化模型和双路径模型则是将两种理论分别加以整合提出的新解释。研究者还对面孔识别自我群体偏向的神经机制进行了研究, 探讨了评价者、评价对象和评价任务等因素对自我群体偏向的影响。提升面孔识别自我群体偏向研究的生态效度, 构建整合性理论模型以及加强跨文化和本土研究是未来研究的重要方向。


[1] 吕勇, 刘亚平, 罗跃嘉. (2011). 记忆面孔, 男女有别: 关于面孔再认性别差异的行为与ERP研究. 科学通报, 56(14), 1112-1123.
[2] 唐卫海, 张晓沛, 唐厅, 李楠, 刘希平. (2017). 同龄效应的类别化-个体化模型. 心理科学, (3), 540-546.
[3] 佐斌, 温芳芳, 宋静静, 代涛涛. (2019). 社会分类的特性、维度及心理效应. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 141-148.
[4] Ackerman, J. M., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V., ... Schaller, M. (2006). They all look the same to me (unless they’ re angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science, 17(10), 836-840.
URLpmid: 17100781
[5] Bernstein, M. J., Sacco, D., Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2014). The impact of race and inclusionary status on memory for ingroup and outgroup faces. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 191-198.
[6] Blandón-Gitlin, I., Pezdek, K., Saldivar, S., & Steelman, E. (2014). Oxytocin eliminates the own-race bias in face recognition memory. Brain Research, 1580, 180-187.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.015URLpmid: 23872107
[7] Bower, G. H., & Karlin, M. B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(4), 751-757.
[8] Cronin, S. L., Craig, B. M., & Lipp, O. V. (2019). Emotional expressions reduce the own-age bias. Emotion, 19(7), 1206-1213.
URLpmid: 30265077
[9] Freeman, J. B., Ma, Y., Barth, M., Young, S. G., Han, S., & Ambady, N. (2013). The neural basis of contextual influences on face categorization. Cerebral Cortex February, 25(2), 415-422.
[10] Hayward, W. G., Crookes, k., & Rhodes, G. (2013). The other-race effect: Holistic coding differences and beyond. Visual Cognition, 21(9-10), 1224-1247.
[11] Hehman, E., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2010). Where the division lies: common ingroup identity moderates the cross-race facial-recognition effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 445-448.
[12] Herlitz, A., & Lovén, J. (2013). Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review. Visual Cognition, 21(9-10), 1306-1336.
[13] Hills, P. J., Pake, J. M., & Dempsey, J. R. (2018). Exploring the contribution of motivation and experience in the postpubescent own-gender bias in face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(9), 1426-1446.
URLpmid: 29733672
[14] Hugenberg, K., Wilson, J. P., See, P. E., & Young, S. G. (2013). Towards a synthetic model of own group biases in face memory. Visual Cognition, 21(9-10), 1392-1417.
[15] Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Sacco, D. F. (2010). The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychological Review, 117(4), 1168-1187.
doi: 10.1037/a0020463URLpmid: 20822290
[16] Kawakami, K., Williams, A., Sidhu, D., Choma, B. L., Rodriguez-Bailón, R., Ca?adas, E., & Hugenberg, K. (2014). An eye for the I: Preferential attention to the eyes of ingroup members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(1), 1-20.
URLpmid: 24956311
[17] Kuiper, N. A., & Rogers, T. B. (1979). Encoding of personal information: Self-other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(4), 499-514.
[18] Lewin, C., & Herlitz, A. (2002). Sex differences in face recognition-women's faces make the difference. Brain & Cognition, 50(1), 121-128.
URLpmid: 12372357
[19] Lovén, J., Herlitz, A., & Rehnman, J. (2011). Women's own-gender bias in face recognition memory. Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 333-340.
doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000100URLpmid: 21310695
[20] Man, T. W., & Hills, P. J. (2017). Eye-tracking the own-gender bias in face recognition: Other-gender faces are viewed differently to own-gender faces. Visual Cognition, 24(9-10), 447-458.
[21] Martschuk, N., & Sporer, S. l. (2018). Memory for faces in old age: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 33(6), 904-923.
[22] McKone, E., Aitkin, A., & Edwards, M. (2005). Categorical and coordinate relations in faces, or fechner's law and face space instead? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1181-1198.
[23] Mckone, E., Hall, A., Pidcock, M., Palermo, R., Wilkinson, R. B., Rivolta, D., et al. (2011). Face ethnicity and measurement reliability affect face recognition performance in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence from the Cambridge face memory test - Australian. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28(2), 109-146.
URLpmid: 22122116
[24] Michel, C., Corneille, O., & Rossion, B. (2007). Race categorization modulates holistic face encoding. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 911-924.
URLpmid: 21635322
[25] Michel, C., Corneille, O., & Rossion, B. (2010). Race categorization modulates holistic face encoding. Cognitive Science, 31(5), 911-924.
URLpmid: 21635322
[26] Motta-Mena, N., Picci, G., & Scherf, S. (2016). Dominance elicits the own-gender bias in males. Journal of Vision, 16(12), 497.
[27] Motta-Mena, Picci, & Scherf. (2016). Dominance elicits the own-gender bias in males. Journal of Vision, 16(12), 494.
[28] Mueller, J. H., Bailis, K. L., & Goldstein, A. G. (1979). Depth of processing and anxiety in facial recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 70(4), 511-515.
[29] Ofan, R. H., Rubin, N., & Amodio, D. M. (2011). Seeing race: N170 responses to race and their relation to automatic racial attitudes and controlled processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3151-3161.
[30] Pauker, K., Weisbuch, M., Ambady, N., Sommers, S. R., Adams, R. B., & Ivcevic, Z. (2009). Not so black and white: Memory for ambiguous group members. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 96(4), 795-810.
URLpmid: 19309203
[31] Picci, G., Gotts, S. J., & Scherf, K. S. (2016). A theoretical rut: Revisiting and critically evaluating the generalized under/over-connectivity hypothesis of autism. Developmental Science, 19(4), 524-549.
URLpmid: 27412228
[32] Proietti, V., Cassia, V. M., & Mondloch, C. J. (2015). The own-age face recognition bias is task dependent. British Journal of Psychology, 106(3), 446-467.
URLpmid: 25491773
[33] Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 186-201.
[34] Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012). The own-age bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 138(1), 146-74.
doi: 10.1037/a0025750URLpmid: 22061689
[35] Rogers, T. B., Rogers, P. J., & Kuiper, N. A. (1979). Evidence for the self as a cognitive prototype: The "false alarms effect." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5(1), 53-56.
[36] Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Us and them: Memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 687-692.
[37] Rule, N. O., Garrett, J. V., & Ambady, N. (2010). Places and faces: Geographic environment influences the ingroup memory advantage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 343-355.
doi: 10.1037/a0018589URLpmid: 20175617
[38] Short, L. A., Semplonius, T., Proietti, V., & Mondloch, C. J. (2014). Differential attentional allocation and subsequent recognition for young verus older adult faces. Visual Cognition, 22(9-10), 1272-1295.
[39] Sporer, S. L. (1991). Deep-Deeper-Deepest? Encoding strategies and the recognition of human faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 17(2), 323-333.
[40] Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology Public Policy & Law, 7(1), 36-97.
[41] Sporer, S. L., & Horry, R. (2011). Recognizing faces from ethnic in-groups and out‐groups: Importance of outer face features and effects of retention interval. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 424-431.
[42] Tanaka, J. W., Heptonstall, B., & Hagen, S. (2013). Perceptual expertise and the plasticity of other-race face recognition. Visual Cognition, 21(9-10), 1183-1201.
[43] Tham, D. S. Y., Bremner, J. G., & Hay, D. (2015). In infancy the timing of emergence of the other-race effect is dependent on face gender. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 131-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.05.006URLpmid: 26143499
[44] Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 43(2), 161-204.
URLpmid: 1866456
[45] van, Bavel, J., J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2012). A social identity approach to person memory: Group membership, collective identification, and social role shape attention and memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1566-1578.
doi: 10.1177/0146167212455829URLpmid: 22914991
[46] Wang, B. (2013). Gender difference in recognition memory for neutral and emotional faces. Memory, 21(8), 991-1003.
doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.771273URLpmid: 23432017
[47] Wan, L. L., Crookes, K., Reynolds, K. J., Irons, J. L., & McKone, E. (2015). A cultural setting where the other-race effect on face recognition has no social-motivational component and derives entirely from lifetime perceptual experience. Cognition, 144, 91-115.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.011URLpmid: 26257000
[48] Wiese, H., Komes, J., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2013). Ageing faces in ageing minds: A review on the own-age bias in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 21(9-10), 1337-1363.
[49] Wiese, H., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2018). Inequality between biases in face memory: Event-related potentials reveal dissociable neural correlates of own-race and own-gender biases. Cortex, 101, 119-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.016URLpmid: 29475077
[50] Wilson, J. P., See, P. E., Bernstein, M. J., Hugenberg, K., & Chartier, C. (2014). Differences in anticipated interaction drive own group biases in face memory. PloS One, 9(3), e90668.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090668URLpmid: 24599294
[51] Wolff, N., Kemter, K., Schweinberger, S. R., & Wiese, H. (2014). What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 580-590.
URLpmid: 23474824
[52] Yan, L., Zhe, W., Huang, J., Sun, Y. H. P., Judges, R. A., Xiao, N. G., ... Lee, K. (2017). Own-group face recognition bias: The effects of location and reputation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1734.
URLpmid: 29066989
[53] Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J., & Hugenberg, K. (2010). When do own-group biases in face recognition occur? Encoding versus post-encoding. Social Cognition, 28(2), 240-250.
[54] Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2012). Individuation motivation and face experience can operate jointly to produce the own-race bias. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 80-87.




[1]于明阳, 李富洪, 曹碧华, . 愉快面孔识别优势及其认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(2): 254-261.
[2]钱浩悦;朱敏;高湘萍. 老年人面孔构形加工特点[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(2): 230-236.
[3]张凯莉, 张琴, 周静, 王沛. 面孔识别过程中多重社会亚范畴的交互作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(11): 1955-1963.
[4]李琎; 范伟; 张文洁; 钟毅平. 旋转自我面孔识别及其认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 50-.
[5]冯新然; 周国梅. 学习时间和面孔运动模式对动态面孔本族效应的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 79-.
[6]王原野; 罗欢. 面孔启动效应中的行为振荡[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 96-.
[7]马建苓;陈旭;王婧. 自我面孔识别的特征、影响因素及ERP研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(2): 240-247.
[8]关丽丽;齐铭铭;张庆林;杨娟. 自我面孔识别的脑机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(9): 1313-1318.
[9]汪亚珉;黄雅梅. 面孔识别中的构形加工与特征加工[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(8): 1126-1137.
[10]王玉娜;陈楚侨. 自我缺损与精神分裂症[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(12): 1882-1891.
[11]李明芳;张烨;张庆林. 面孔识别中脑电成分N170的研究概述[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(12): 1942-1948.
[12]王丽娟;罗红格;姚雪. 自闭症谱系障碍者面孔识别的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(6): 1177-1184.
[13]赵玉晶;王申连;丁家永. 新生儿面孔识别中的两种偏好现象[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(6): 1234-1241.
[14]周国梅;张璐然;曾伟贤. 面孔识别的本族效应理论述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(2): 278-283.
[15]陈桄;朱皕. 婴儿面孔偏好理论模型述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(4): 625-630.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=5110
相关话题/心理 科学 神经 社会 成绩

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 心理治疗中的脱落
    何姣1,白宝玉2(),夏勉31武汉大学学生工作部大学生心理健康教育中心2武汉大学哲学学院心理学系,武汉4300723华中师范大学心理学院,武汉430079收稿日期:2019-09-30出版日期:2020-07-15发布日期:2020-05-21通讯作者:白宝玉E-mail:psy_bby@163.c ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 慈悲冥想对利他行为的影响及其认知神经机制
    金国敏,李丹()上海师范大学心理学系,上海200234收稿日期:2019-09-05出版日期:2020-06-15发布日期:2020-04-22通讯作者:李丹E-mail:lidan501@126.com基金资助:*上海市教委科研创新计划重大项目(2019-01-07-00-02-E00005)Th ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 员工对企业社会责任的差异化反应:基于归因理论的阐释
    颜爱民,李亚丽,谢菊兰(),李莹中南大学商学院,长沙410083收稿日期:2019-05-15出版日期:2020-06-15发布日期:2020-04-22通讯作者:谢菊兰E-mail:julia_xie@csu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(71972185);国家自然科学基金项目( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 行为贫困陷阱的心理机制与管理对策:基于认知与动机双视角
    徐富明1,黄龙2,3(),张慧4,相鹏5(),刘腾飞6,李亚红71南宁师范大学教育科学学院,南宁5302992皖南医学院人文与管理学院,芜湖3410023江西师范大学心理学院,南昌3300224华中科技大学社会学院,武汉4300745南京财经大学法学院,南京2100236广东医科大学人文与管理学院, ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 人声加工的神经机制
    伍可1,2,陈杰1,2(),李雯婕1,2,陈洁佳1,2,刘雷3,刘翠红1,21湖南师范大学教育科学学院2湖南师范大学认知与人类行为湖南省重点实验室,长沙4100813北京大学心理与认知科学学院,北京100080收稿日期:2019-07-11出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 老年人视听觉整合的影响因素及其神经机制
    杨伟平1,3(),李胜楠1,李子默1,郭敖1,任艳娜2()1湖北大学教育学院心理学系,武汉4300622贵州中医药大学人文与管理学院心理学教研室,贵阳5500253湖北大学教育学院脑与认知研究中心,武汉430062收稿日期:2019-08-13出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03- ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 信任的认知神经网络模型
    陈瀛,徐敏霞,汪新建()南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系,天津300350收稿日期:2019-09-20出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27通讯作者:汪新建E-mail:wangxj@nankai.edu.cn基金资助:&教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 稀缺对个体心理和行为的影响:基于一个更加整合视角下的阐释
    雷亮(),王菁煜,柳武妹兰州大学管理学院,兰州730000收稿日期:2019-05-13出版日期:2020-04-26发布日期:2020-03-27通讯作者:雷亮E-mail:leil@lzu.edu.cn基金资助:&国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972092);国家自然科学基金重点 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 空间频率影响恐惧面孔表情加工的神经通路
    贺则宇,张紫琦,李可轩,何蔚祺()辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心,大连116029收稿日期:2019-06-20出版日期:2020-04-15发布日期:2020-02-24通讯作者:何蔚祺E-mail:weiqi79920686@sina.com基金资助:国家自然科学基金面上项目(319709 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 儿童行为抑制性与心理障碍关联的认知神经过程
    尤媛,王莉()北京大学心理与认知科学学院,北京100871收稿日期:2019-05-05出版日期:2020-04-15发布日期:2020-02-24通讯作者:王莉E-mail:liwang@pku.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金(31771230)Cognitiveneurologicalp ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01