删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

事件切割:我们如何知觉并记忆日常事件?

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

邵意如, 周楚()
复旦大学心理学系, 上海 200433
收稿日期:2018-11-09出版日期:2019-09-15发布日期:2019-07-24
通讯作者:周楚E-mail:zhouchu@fudan.edu.cn

基金资助:上海市浦江人才计划资助(15PJC015)

Event segmentation: How do we perceive and remember events?

SHAO Yiru, ZHOU Chu()
Department of Psychology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Received:2018-11-09Online:2019-09-15Published:2019-07-24
Contact:ZHOU Chu E-mail:zhouchu@fudan.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 事件切割指的是人们将连续的外界信息析解成若干个有意义且互相关联的事件的过程, 实验室中通常使用事件切割任务对其进行研究。事件切割既包含自下而上的加工过程, 也有自上而下加工的成分。事件切割活动对记忆有着重要的影响, 个体知觉事件、回忆事件的能力被认为与其日常生活紧密相关。解释事件切割加工过程和特征的理论模型主要包括情境模型、事件切割理论和事件视界模型。未来的研究可以深入探讨事件记忆在不同测试类型上的差异, 并关注事件切割过程中的注意分配过程。


1 迟毓凯 . ( 2002). 情境模型与语篇理解研究. 心理科学, 25(3), 379-379.
2 李英迪, 何先友 . ( 2009). 记叙文中时间信息的事件边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 7(2), 109-113.
3 Bailey H. R., Kurby C. A., Sargent J. Q., & Zacks J. M . ( 2017). Attentional focus affects how events are segmented and updated in narrative reading. Memory & Cognition, 45(6), 940-955.
4 Cabeza R., Kapur S., Craik F. I., McIntosh A. R., Houle S., & Tulving E . ( 1997). Functional neuroanatomy of recall and recognition: A PET study of episodic memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(2), 254-265.
5 Daniel, L. G . ( 1988). Behavior perception, affect, and memory. Social Cognition, 6(2), 150-176.
6 Delogu F., Drenhaus H., & Crocker M. W . ( 2018). On the predictability of event boundaries in discourse: An ERP investigation. Memory & Cognition, 46(2), 315-325.
7 Dunsmoor J. E., Kroes M. C. W., Moscatelli C. M., Evans M. D., Davachi L., & Phelps E. A . ( 2018). Event segmentation protects emotional memories from competing experiences encoded close in time. Nature Human Behaviour, 2( 4), 291-299.
8 Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2011). What constitutes an episode in episodic memory? Psychological Science, 22(2), 243-252.
9 Flores S., Bailey H. R., Eisenberg M. L., & Zacks J. M . ( 2017). Event segmentation improves event memory up to one month later.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 43 (8), 1183-1202.
10 Gold D. A., Zacks J. M., & Flores S . ( 2017). Effects of cues to event segmentation on subsequent memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2 (1), 1.
11 Gupta R., & Gurrin, C. (2018). Approaches for event segmentation of visual lifelog data. In K. Schoeffmann, T. H. Chalidabhongse, C. W. Ngo, S. Aramvith, N. E. O’Connor, Y.-S. Ho, M. Gabbouj, & A. Elgammal (Eds.), MultiMedia Modeling (pp. 581-593). Springer International Publishing.
12 Hanson, C., & Hirst, W. ( 1989). On the representation of events: A study of orientation, recall, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118 (2), 136-147.
13 Hard B. M., Tversky B., & Lang D. S . ( 2006). Making sense of abstract events: Building event schemas. Memory & Cognition, 34 (6), 1221-1235.
14 Horner A. J., Bisby J. A., Wang A. J., Bogus K., & Burgess N . ( 2016). The role of spatial boundaries in shaping long-term event representations. Cognition, 154, 151-164.
15 Huff M., Meitz T. G. K., & Papenmeier F . (2014). Changes in situation models modulate processes of event perception in audiovisual narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40 (5), 1377-1388.
16 Huff M., Papenmeier F., & Zacks J. M . ( 2012). Visual target detection is impaired at event boundaries. Visual Cognition, 20(7), 848-864.
17 Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A . ( 1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394.
18 Kurby, C.A., & Zacks, J.M . ( 2011). Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events. Memory & Cognition, 39(1), 75-91.
19 Kurby,C. A., & Zacks, J. M . ( 2018). Preserved neural event segmentation in healthy older adults. Psychology and Aging, 33(2), 232-245.
20 Massad C. M., Hubbard M., & Newtson D . ( 1979). Selective perception of events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15(6), 513-532.
21 Morrow D. G., Bower G. H., & Greenspan S. L . ( 1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 28(3), 292-312.
22 Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 28-38.
23 Newtson, D., & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(5), 436-450.
24 Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A . (2016a). Narrative event boundaries, reading times, and expectation. Memory & Cognition, 44(7), 1064-1075.
25 Pettijohn, K. A., & Radvansky, G. A . ( 2016b). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Environmental effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 329-340.
26 Pettijohn K. A., Thompson A. N., Tamplin A. K., Krawietz S. A., & Radvansky G. A . ( 2016). Event boundaries and memory improvement. Cognition, 148, 136-144.
27 Radvansky, G. A . ( 2012). Across the event horizon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 269-272.
28 Radvansky, G. A . ( 2017). Event segmentation as a working memory process. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 121-123
29 Radvansky, G. A., & Copeland, D. E . ( 2006). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1150-1156.
30 Radvansky G. A., Krawietz S. A., & Tamplin A. K . ( 2011). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Further explorations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1632-1645.
31 Radvansky G. A., Pettijohn K. A., & Kim J . ( 2015). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Younger and older adults. Psychology & Aging, 30(2), 259-265.
32 Radvansky G. A., Tamplin A. K., Armendarez J., & Thompson A. N . ( 2014). Different kinds of causality in event cognition. Discourse Processes, 51(7), 601-618.
33 Radvansky G. A., Tamplin A. K., & Krawietz S. A . (2010). Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Environmental integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 900-904.
34 Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M . ( 2011). Event perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(6), 608-620.
35 Richmond L. L., Gold D. A., & Zacks J. M . ( 2017). Event perception: Translations and applications. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 111-120
36 Sargent J. Q., Zacks J. M., Hambrick D. Z., Zacks R. T., Kurby C. A., Bailey H. R., … Beck T. M . ( 2013). Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory. Cognition, 129(2), 241-255.
37 Schwan, S., & Garsoffky B. (2004). The cognitive representation of filmic event summaries. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 37-55.
38 Schwan S., Garsoffky B., & Hesse F. W . ( 2000). Do film cuts facilitate the perceptual and cognitive organization of activitiy sequences?. Memory & Cognition, 28(2), 214-223.
39 Sonne T., Kingo O. S., & Kr?jgaard P . ( 2016). Occlusions at event boundaries during encoding have a negative effect on infant memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 72-82.
40 Sonne T., Kingo O. S., & Kr?jgaard P . ( 2017). Bound to remember: Infants show superior memory for objects presented at event boundaries. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(2), 107-113.
41 Speer N. K., Zacks J. M., & Reynolds J. R . ( 2007). Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychological Science, 18(5), 449-455.
42 Swallow K. M., Barch D. M., Head D., Maley C. J., Holder D., & Zacks J. M . ( 2011). Changes in events alter how people remember recent information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1052-1064.
43 Swallow K. M., Kemp J. T., & Candan Simsek A . ( 2018). The role of perspective in event segmentation. Cognition, 177, 249-262.
44 Swallow K. M., Zacks J. M., & Abrams R. A . ( 2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 138(2), 236-257.
45 Thompson, A. N., & Radvansky,G. A . ( 2016). Event boundaries and anaphoric reference. Psychonom Bull Rev, 23(3), 849-856.
46 Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. Organization of Memory, 381(79), 381-403.
47 Vredeveldt A., Tredoux C. G., Kempen K., & Nortje A . ( 2015). Eye remember what happened: Eye-closure improves recall of events but not face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 169-180.
48 Wahlheim, C. N., & Zacks, J. M . ( 2019). Memory guides the comprehension of event changes for older and younger adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(1), 30-50.
49 Zacks, J. M . ( 2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 979-1008.
50 Zacks J. M., Braver T. S., Sheridan M. A., Donaldson D. I., Snyder A. Z., Ollinger J. M., … Raichle M. E . ( 2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 651-655.
51 Zacks J. M., Speer N. K., Swallow K. M., Braver T. S., & Reynolds J. R . ( 2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2), 273-293.
52 Zacks J. M., Speer N. K., Vettel J. M., & Jacoby L. L . ( 2006). Event understanding and memory in healthy aging and dementia of the Alzheimer type. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 466-482.
53 Zacks J. M., Swallow K. M., Vettel J. M., & McAvoy M. P . ( 2006). Visual motion and the neural correlates of event perception. Brain Research, 1076(1), 150-162.
54 Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. ( 2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 3-21.
55 Zacks J. M., Tversky B., & Iyer G . ( 2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 130(1), 29-58.
56 Zwaan R. A., Langston M. C., & Graesser A. C . ( 1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292-297.




[1]臧学莲, 张笑笑, 贾丽娜, 李根强, 李红. 选择性注意机制在情景线索效应中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1503-1511.
[2]苏彦捷;刘艳春. 亲子交流与儿童心理理论的获得和发展:文化的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(3): 317-327.
[3]刘岩;杨丽珠;徐国庆. 预见: 情景记忆的未来投射与重构[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(9): 1403-1412.
[4]白文;王美芳;闫秀梅. 儿童心理时间之旅的发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(5): 983-989.
[5]刘荣,郭春彦. 工作记忆与情景记忆中脑区的重合与分离——从脑区定位看两者关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2005, 13(4): 435-441.
[6]E.Tulving;杨宁;. 记住过去与知道过去[J]. 心理科学进展, 1992, 0(1): 22-28.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4783
相关话题/心理 科学 过程 信息 复旦大学

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 社会排斥的心理行为特征及其脑机制
    彭苏浩,陶丹,冷玥(),邓慧华东南大学儿童发展与教育研究所,南京210096收稿日期:2019-01-14出版日期:2019-09-15发布日期:2019-07-24通讯作者:冷玥E-mail:lengyue@seu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(31500881);江苏省自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 1993至2016年医学生心理健康变迁的横断历史研究
    辛素飞1(),姜文源1,辛自强21鲁东大学教育科学学院,烟台2640112中央财经大学社会与心理学院,北京100081收稿日期:2018-09-14出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:辛素飞E-mail:xinsufei2005@163.com基金资助:*国家社会科 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 组织认同对员工创新行为的促进和抑制过程
    刘艳(),邹希,舒心武汉大学经济与管理学院,武汉430072收稿日期:2018-12-14出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:刘艳E-mail:leannaliu@whu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(71872135);教育部人文社会科学研究一般项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 面孔表情和声音情绪信息整合加工的脑机制
    李萍,张明明,李帅霞,张火垠,罗文波()辽宁师范大学脑与认知神经科学研究中心,大连116029收稿日期:2018-05-17出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:罗文波E-mail:luowb@lnnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目资助(3187110 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 素食的心理过程及影响因素
    刘潇肖1,田启瑞2(),曾雅丽11厦门大学管理学院,厦门3610052山东师范大学心理学院,济南250358收稿日期:2018-08-12出版日期:2019-07-15发布日期:2019-05-22通讯作者:田启瑞E-mail:tianqirui@sdnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金青 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 群体信息加工视角下团队建言有效性及作用机制:建言数量与质量的影响
    李方君(),王舒曼,李爱梅,李斌暨南大学管理学院,广州510632收稿日期:2018-06-21出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:李方君E-mail:lifangjun@jnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71602076);国家自然科学基金项目( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 和谐医患关系的心理机制及其促进技术
    孙连荣1,王沛2()1上海师范大学天华学院,上海2018152华东师范大学教育学部特殊教育系,上海200062收稿日期:2018-03-07出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22通讯作者:王沛E-mail:wangpei1970@163.com基金资助:国家社会科学重大招标项目 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 风险决策的概率权重偏差:心理机制与优化策略
    孙庆洲,邬青渊,张静,江程铭,赵雷,胡凤培()浙江工业大学管理学院,杭州310023收稿日期:2018-08-23出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:胡凤培E-mail:fengpei@zjut.edu.cn基金资助:*教育部人文社科青年基金项目(18YJC6301 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 不道德传染的心理机制及其影响
    王悦1,龚园超1,2,3,李莹1()1郑州大学教育学院,郑州4500012中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001013中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2018-06-05出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李莹E-mail:liyin ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 揭秘经济管理中的行为异象:心理账户理论的应用启示
    刘培,冯一丹,李爱梅(),刘伟,谢健飞暨南大学管理学院广州510632收稿日期:2018-04-23出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:李爱梅E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71271101);国家自然科学基金项目(7 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01