删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

双重身份下女性对抗性别偏见的回应行为

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

崔佳蕾, 崔丽莹()
上海师范大学心理学系, 上海 200234
收稿日期:2018-08-14出版日期:2019-06-15发布日期:2019-04-22
通讯作者:崔丽莹E-mail:cui720926@163.com



The confrontational response of women to gender prejudice between two identities

CUI Jialei, CUI Liying()
Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
Received:2018-08-14Online:2019-06-15Published:2019-04-22
Contact:CUI Liying E-mail:cui720926@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 偏见不是一种单方面的社会心理现象, 而是偏见持有者、偏见对象、旁观者等多方相互作用和共同建构的结果。当女性在作为受害者和旁观者两种不同身份时, 她们对性别偏见持有者的回应既有相同之处, 也存在着一些差异。压力应对模型和对抗偏见反应模型可作为适应女性双重身份下对抗偏见的两种解释模型, 在面对偏见持有者时, 不同身份下女性对性别偏见的回应行为主要受到乐观、代价/收益、痛苦水平和女权主义等因素的影响。未来研究应进一步聚焦对抗性回应行为的效度争议、对内隐性别偏见持有者的干预和拓展想象接触的替代作用。


1 程永佳, 杨莉萍 . ( 2017). 对抗偏见: 作为偏见消减策略的社会行为. 心理科学进展, 25( 4), 672-681.
2 梁瑞, 王葵, 陈楚侨 . ( 2017). 体像困扰与社会文化因素. 心理科学, 40( 1), 187-192.
3 曲映蓓, 辛自强 . ( 2016). 中小学生民族偏见与歧视的成因及干预策略:群际接触的视角. 心理技术与应用, 2( 2), 116-124.
4 张陆, 叶娜, 刘峰 . ( 2015). 无偏见动机对刻板印象和偏见激活的抑制作用:基于四分模型的分析. 心理与行为研究, 13( 4), 552-557.
5 Ashburn-Nardo L., Blanchar J. C., Petersson J., Morris K. A., & Goodwin S. A . ( 2014). Do you say something when it’s your boss? The role of perpetrator power in prejudice confrontation. Journal of Social Issues, 70( 4), 615-636.
doi: 10.1111/josi.12082URL
6 Ashburn-Nardo L., Morris K. A., & Goodwin S. A . ( 2008). The confronting prejudiced responses (CPR) model: Applying CPR in organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7( 3), 332-342.
7 Ayres M. M., Friedman C. K., & Leaper C . ( 2009). Individual and situational factors related to young women’s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles, 61( 7), 449-460.
8 Bastomski, S., & Smith, P . ( 2017). Gender, fear, and public places: How negative encounters with strangers harm women. Sex Roles, 76( 1-2), 73-88.
doi: 10.1007/s11199-016-0654-6URL
9 Benavides-Espinoza, C., & Cunningham, G. B . ( 2010). Bystanders’ reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 63( 3-4), 201-213.
10 Bennett S., Banyard V. L., & Garnhart L . ( 2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29( 3), 476-496.
doi: 10.1177/0886260513505210URL
11 Brinkman B. G., Dean A. M., Simpson C. K., McGinley M., & Rosén L. A . ( 2015). Bystander intervention during college women’s experiences of gender prejudice. Sex Roles, 72( 11-12), 485-498.
12 Brinkman B. G., Garcia K., & Rickard K. M . ( 2011). “What I wanted to do was…” Discrepancies between college women’s desired and reported responses to gender prejudice. Sex Roles, 65( 5-6), 344-355.
13 Brinkman, B. G., & Rickard, K. M . ( 2009). College students’ descriptions of everyday gender prejudice. Sex Roles, 61( 7-8), 461-475.
14 Chaney, K. E., & Sanchez, D. T . ( 2018). The endurance of interpersonal confrontations as a prejudice reduction strategy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44( 3), 418-429.
doi: 10.1177/0146167217741344URL
15 Chaudoir, S. R., & Quinn, D. M . ( 2010). Bystander sexism in the intergroup context: The impact of cat-calls on women’s reactions towards men. Sex Roles, 62( 9-10), 623-634.
doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9735-0URL
16 Corrigan P. W., Sheehan L., Al-Khouja M. A., Lewy S., Major D. R., Mead J., & Weber S . ( 2017). Insight into the stigma of suicide loss survivors: Factor analyses of family stereotypes, prejudices, and discriminations. Archives of Suicide Research, 22( 1), 57-66.
17 Crosby, J. R . ( 2015). The silent majority: Understanding and increasing majority group responses to discrimination. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9( 10), 539-550.
doi: 10.1111/spc3.v9.10URL
18 Drury, B. J., & Kaiser, C. R . ( 2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70( 4), 637-652.
doi: 10.1111/josi.12083URL
19 Fischer P., Greitemeyer T., Pollozek F., & Frey D . ( 2006). The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies? European Journal of Social Psychology, 36( 2), 267-278.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992URL
20 Forscher P. S., Mitamura C., Dix E. L., Cox W. T. L., & Devine P. G . ( 2017). Breaking the prejudice habit: Mechanisms, timecourse, and longevity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 133-146.
21 Girvan E. J., Deason G., & Borgida E . ( 2015). The generalizability of gender bias: Testing the effects of contextual, explicit, and implicit sexism on labor arbitration decisions. Law & Human Behavior, 39( 5), 525-537.
22 Good J. J., Moss-Racusin C. A., & Sanchez D. T . ( 2012). When do we confront? Perceptions of costs and benefits predict confronting discrimination on behalf of the self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36( 2), 210-226.
23 Gulker J. E., Mark A. Y., & Monteith M. J . ( 2013). Confronting prejudice: The who, what, and why of confrontation effectiveness. Social Influence, 8( 4), 280-293.
24 Hammond M. D., Milojev P., Huang Y., & Sibley C. G . ( 2018). Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9( 7), 863-874.
doi: 10.1177/1948550617727588URL
25 Hu X., Antony J. W., Creery J. D., Vargas L. M., Bodenhausen G. V., & Paller K. A . ( 2015). Unlearning implicit social. biases during sleep. Science, 348( 6238), 1013-1015.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3841URL
26 Hyers, L. L . ( 2007). Resisting prejudice every day: Exploring women’s assertive responses to anti-black racism, anti- semitism, heterosexism, and sexism. Sex Roles, 56( 1-2), 1-12.
27 Kahn K. B., Barreto M., Kaiser C. R., & Rego M. S . ( 2016). When do high and low status group members support. confrontation? The role of perceived pervasiveness of prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55( 1), 27-43.
doi: 10.1111/bjso.2016.55.issue-1URL
28 Kaiser C. R., Major B., & McCoy S. K . ( 2004). Expectations about the future and the emotion consequences of perceiving prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30( 2), 173-184.
29 Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T . ( 2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27( 2), 254-263.
30 Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T . ( 2004). A stress and coping perspective on confronting sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28( 2), 168-178.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00133.xURL
31 Kuchynka S. L., Salomon K., Bosson J. K., El-Hout M., Kiebel E., Cooperman C., & Toomey R . ( 2018). Hostile and benevolent sexism and college women’s stem outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42( 1), 72-87.
doi: 10.1177/0361684317741889URL
32 Leaper, C., & Arias, D. M . ( 2011). College women's feminist identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for coping with sexism. Sex Roles, 64( 7-8), 475-490.
33 Parker L. R., Monteith M. J., Moss-Racusin C. A., & van Camp, A. R . ( 2018). Promoting concern about gender bias with evidence-based confrontation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 8-23.
34 Sechrist, G. B . ( 2010). Making attributions to and plans to confront gender discrimination: The role of optimism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40( 7), 1678-1707.
35 Shelton, J. N., & Stewart, R. E . ( 2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28( 3), 215-223.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.xURL
36 Shepherd, L. ( 2019). Responding to sexual objectification: The role of emotions in influencing willingness to undertake different types of action. Sex Roles, 80( 1-2), 25-40.
doi: 10.1007/s11199-018-0912-x
37 Simon, S., & O'Brien, L. T . ( 2015). Confronting sexism: Exploring the effect of nonsexist credentials on the costs of target confrontations. Sex Roles, 73( 5-6), 245-257.
38 Stangor C., van Allen K. L., Swim J. K., & Sechrist G. B . ( 2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82( 1), 69-74.
39 Swim J. K., Cohen L. L., & Hyers, L. L .( 1998) . Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds). Prejudice: The target’s perspective. (pp. 37-60). Academic Press.
40 Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L . ( 1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?! Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35( 1), 68-88.
41 Weber, D. M., & Dickter, C. L . ( 2015). Confronting the “F” word: The effects of gender, ambiguity, and individual difference variables on non-targets’ confrontation of heterosexist comments. Journal of Homosexuality, 62( 10), 1289-1312.
doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1060050URL
42 Weis A. S., Redford L., Zucker A. N., & Ratliff K. A . ( 2018). Feminist identity, attitudes toward feminist prototypes, and willingness to intervene in everyday sexist events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42( 3), 279-290.
doi: 10.1177/0361684318764694URL
43 Yetkili O., Abrams D., Travaglino G. A., & Giner-Sorolla R . ( 2018). Imagined contact with atypical outgroup members that are anti-normative within their group can reduce prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 208-219.




[1]张振, 齐春辉, 王洋, 赵辉, 王小新, 高晓雷. 内群体偏爱或黑羊效应?经济博弈中公平规范执行的群体偏见[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(2): 329-339.
[2]张珊珊, 谢晋宇, 吴敏. “蜜糖裹砒霜”:善意性别偏见对女性生涯发展的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1478-1488.
[3]黄勖喆, 褚晓伟, 刘庆奇, 周宗奎, 范翠英. 网络欺负中的旁观者行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1248-1257.
[4]殷继兴, 胡传鹏. 神经科学偏见效应:可重复性及其心理机制的探索[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 1988-1995.
[5]程永佳; 杨莉萍. 对抗偏见:作为偏见消减策略的社会行为[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(4): 672-681.
[6]艾娟. 扩展群际接触:观点、机制与展望[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(5): 836-843.
[7]蒋燕玲, 杨红升. 语言背后的心理——群体间的语言偏见[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(12): 2142-2152.
[8]党宝宝;高承海;杨阳;万明钢. 群际威胁:影响因素与减少策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(4): 711-720.
[9]杨廙;胡金生. 内隐种族偏见的干预策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(11): 2064-2072.
[10]于海涛;杨金花;张雁军;金盛华. 想象接触减少偏见:理论依据、实践需要与作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(10): 1824-1832.
[11]高承海;侯玲;吕超;万明钢. 内隐理论与群体关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(8): 1180-1188.
[12]辛素飞;辛自强. 社会身份复杂性的研究:理论、方法与进展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(3): 433-442.
[13]钟毅平;陈芸;张珊明;杨青松. 内隐自我正面偏见的机制及可变性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(12): 1908-1919.
[14]李森森; 龙长权; 陈庆飞; 李红. 群际接触理论——一种改善群际关系的理论[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(5): 831-839.
[15]李琼; 刘力. 偏见的自我调节研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(2): 365-373.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4710
相关话题/心理 科学 社会 语言 偏见

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 内疚与亲社会行为的关系:来自元分析的证据
    汤明,李伟强,刘福会,袁博()宁波大学心理学系暨研究所,浙江宁波315211收稿日期:2018-05-18出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:袁博E-mail:yuanbopsy@gmail.com基金资助:*国家自然科学基金(31600914);教育部人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 垂体后叶加压素对人类社会行为的影响
    吴小燕1,2,封春亮2,徐家华4,何振宏5,罗艺6,罗跃嘉1,2,3()1深圳大学脑疾病与认知科学研究中心2深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室3深圳市神经科学研究院情绪与大脑中心,深圳5180604北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008755DivisionofNeuroscie ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 风险决策的概率权重偏差:心理机制与优化策略
    孙庆洲,邬青渊,张静,江程铭,赵雷,胡凤培()浙江工业大学管理学院,杭州310023收稿日期:2018-08-23出版日期:2019-05-15发布日期:2019-03-20通讯作者:胡凤培E-mail:fengpei@zjut.edu.cn基金资助:*教育部人文社科青年基金项目(18YJC6301 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 从动作模仿到社会认知:自我-他人控制的作用
    王协顺,苏彦捷()北京大学心理与认知科学学院,行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室,北京100871收稿日期:2018-10-17出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:苏彦捷E-mail:yjsu@pku.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31571134);国 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 不道德传染的心理机制及其影响
    王悦1,龚园超1,2,3,李莹1()1郑州大学教育学院,郑州4500012中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001013中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2018-06-05出版日期:2019-04-15发布日期:2019-02-22通讯作者:李莹E-mail:liyin ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 揭秘经济管理中的行为异象:心理账户理论的应用启示
    刘培,冯一丹,李爱梅(),刘伟,谢健飞暨南大学管理学院广州510632收稿日期:2018-04-23出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:李爱梅E-mail:tliaim@jnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71271101);国家自然科学基金项目(7 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 行为社会政策:“助推”公共福利的实践与探索
    张书维,梁歆佚,岳经纶()中山大学中国公共管理研究中心、政治与公共事务管理学院,广州510275收稿日期:2018-04-03出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:岳经纶E-mail:E-mail:klngok@126.com基金资助:国家社会科学基金青年项目资助(1 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理表征的可视化途径:基于噪音的反向相关图像分类技术
    侯春娜1(),刘志军21东北师范大学心理学院,长春1300242长春理工大学社会学系,长春130022收稿日期:2018-07-17出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:侯春娜E-mail:houcn359@nenu.edu.cn基金资助:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 暴力视频游戏对个体亲社会性的影响:一项元分析
    邵嵘,滕召军,刘衍玲()西南大学心理健康教育研究中心,重庆400715收稿日期:2017-11-24出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:刘衍玲E-mail:ssq@swu.edu.cn基金资助:国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“亲社会视频游戏对青少年亲社会行为的影响” ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言加工过程中的视听跨通道整合
    韩海宾,许萍萍,屈青青,程茜,李兴珊()中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101;中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2018-02-28出版日期:2019-03-15发布日期:2019-01-22通讯作者:李兴珊E-mail:lixs@psych.ac.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金委 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01