删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

路径知识习得的认知老化效应

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

张爱珍1, 王垚1,2, 李晶1()
1南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210097
2河北中医学院, 石家庄 050000
收稿日期:2018-05-19出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25
通讯作者:李晶E-mail:lij@njnu.edu.cn

基金资助:* 江苏省高校自然科学基金, 南京师范大学“青蓝工程”资助(17KJD19002)

The cognitive aging effect of route knowledge acquisition

ZHANG Aizhen1, WANG Yao1,2, LI Jing1()
1 School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
2 Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
Received:2018-05-19Online:2019-02-15Published:2018-12-25
Contact:LI Jing E-mail:lij@njnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 年龄与路径知识习得的关系是空间与认知老化两大领域研究的重要议题。老年人在面对不同的路径学习环境时呈现出不同的认知老化表现。以往与年龄相关的路径知识习得能力变化的研究, 主要支持了认知老化衰退理论。然而近来发现随着年龄增长, 老年人保留了一种空间认知补偿能力。由此, 在对前人文献进行回顾和反思的基础上, 整合路径知识习得的认知老化表现及机制以探究缓解空间认知老化可能的内部因素和外部有效措施。



图1左:由11个交叉点组成的路径追踪路线示意图。右:一个十字路口的视觉呈现图
图1左:由11个交叉点组成的路径追踪路线示意图。右:一个十字路口的视觉呈现图



图2路径完成任务示意图。被试从H出发, 穿过五条外出路径到达A, 要求直接返回H。返回H的正确方式是先自转一个角度?, 再前进一个距离C。被试实际可能做出的反应是, 转过角度?r再前进一个距离Cr, 到达一个新的位置Hr。通过评估位置误差、角度误差与距离误差来判断被试在路径完成任务中的表现。
图2路径完成任务示意图。被试从H出发, 穿过五条外出路径到达A, 要求直接返回H。返回H的正确方式是先自转一个角度?, 再前进一个距离C。被试实际可能做出的反应是, 转过角度?r再前进一个距离Cr, 到达一个新的位置Hr。通过评估位置误差、角度误差与距离误差来判断被试在路径完成任务中的表现。







1 何承林, 陈传锋 . ( 2013). 活动参与在认知损害中的延缓作用.心理科学进展, 21( 3), 506-516.
2 宛小昂 . ( 2016). 人类路径整合的现象与机制. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社.
3 Adler J., Beutel M. E., Knebel A., Berti S., Unterrainer J., & Michal M . ( 2014). Altered orientation of spatial attention in depersonalization disorder.Psychiatry Research, 216( 2), 230-235.
4 Aisenberg D., Sapir A., d'Avossa G., & Henik A . ( 2014). Long trial durations normalise the interference effect and sequential updating during healthy aging. Acta Psychologica, 153, 169-178.
5 Allison S. & Head, D. ( 2017). Route repetition and route reversal: Effects of age and encoding method.Psychology & Aging, 32( 3), 220-231.
6 Ashendorf L. & McCaffrey, R.J . ( 2008). Exploring age-related decline on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22( 2), 262-272.
7 Bates, S.L., & Wolbers, T. ( 2014). How cognitive aging affects multisensory integration of navigational cues.Neurobiology of Aging, 35( 12), 2761-2769.
8 Borella E., Meneghetti C., Ronconi L., & De Beni R . ( 2014). Spatial abilities across the adult life Span.Developmental Psychology, 50( 2), 384-392.
9 Byrne P., Becker S., & Burgess N . ( 2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: A neural model of spatial memory and imagery.Psychological Review, 114( 2), 340-375.
10 Campbell K. L., Al-Aidroos N., Fatt R., Pratt J., & Hasher L . ( 2010). The effects of multisensory targets on saccadic trajectory deviations: Eliminating age differences.Experimental Brain Research, 201( 3), 385-392.
11 Chen X. L., McNamara T. P., Kelly J. W., & Wolbers T . ( 2017). Cue combination in human spatial navigation.Cognitive Psychology, 95, 105-144.
12 Cushman L. A., Stein K., & Duffy C. J . ( 2008). Detecting navigational deficits in cognitive aging and Alzheimer disease using virtual reality. Neurology, 71( 12), 888-895.
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000326262.67613.feURLpmid: 18794491
13 Davis S. W., Kragel J. E., Madden D. J., & Cabeza R . ( 2012). The architecture of cross-hemispheric communication in the aging brain: Linking behavior to functional and structural connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 22( 1), 232-242.
14 Devlin, A.L., & Wilson, P.H . ( 2010). Adult age differences in the ability to mentally transform object and body stimuli.Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 17( 6), 709-729.
15 Diaconescu A. O., Hasher L., & McIntosh A. R . ( 2013). Visual dominance and multisensory integration changes with age. Neuroimage, 65, 152-166.
16 Gamboz N., Borella E., & Brandimonte M. A . ( 2009). The role of switching, inhibition and working memory in older adults' performance in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 16( 3), 260-284.
17 Gazes Y. L., Rakitin B. C., Habeck C., Steffener J., & Stern Y . ( 2012). Age differences of multivariate network expressions during task-switching and their associations with behavior.Neuropsychologia, 50( 14), 3509-3518.
18 Grady C. L., Protzner A. B., Kovacevic N., Strother S. C., Afshin-Pour B., Wojtowicz M., .. McIntosh A. R . ( 2010). A multivariate analysis of age-related differences in default mode and task-positive networks across multiple cognitive domains.Cerebral Cortex, 20( 6), 1432-1447.
19 Grewe P., Lahr D., Kohsik A., Dyck E., Markowitsch H. J., Bien C. G., .. Piefke M . ( 2014). Real-life memory and spatial navigation in patients with focal epilepsy: Ecological validity of a virtual reality supermarket task.Epilepsy & Behavior, 31, 57-66.
20 Grieves, R.M., & Jeffery, K.J . ( 2017). The representation of space in the brain.Behavioural Processes, 135, 113-131.
21 Gyselinck V., Meneghetti C., Bormetti M., Orriols E., Piolino P., & De Beni R . ( 2013). Considering spatial ability in virtual route learning in early aging.Cognitive Processing, 14, 309-316.
22 Hakun J. G., Zhu Z. D., Johnson N. F., & Gold B. T . ( 2015). Evidence for reduced efficiency and successful compensation in older adults during task switching.Cortex, 64, 352-362.
23 Hara Y., Rapp P. R., & Morrison J. H . ( 2012). Neuronal and morphological bases of cognitive decline in aged rhesus monkeys.Age, 34( 5), 1051-1073.
24 Harris M. A., Wiener J. M., & Wolbers T . ( 2012). Aging specifically impairs switching to an allocentric navigational strategy. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 4, 29.
25 Harris, M.A., & Wolbers, T. ( 2012). Aging effects on path integration and landmark navigation.Hippocampus, 22( 8), 1770-1780.
26 Harris, M.A., & Wolbers, T. ( 2014). How age-related strategy switching deficits affect wayfinding in complex environments.Neurobiology of Aging, 35( 5), 1095-1102.
27 Head D. & Isom, M. ( 2010). Age effects on wayfinding and route learning skills.Behavioural Brain Research, 209( 1), 49-58.
28 Iaria G., Palermo L., Committeri G., & Barton, J. J. S .( 2009). Age differences in the formation and use of cognitive maps. Behavioural Brain Research, 196( 2), 187-191.
29 Jansen P., Schmelter A., & Heil M . ( 2010). Spatial knowledge acquisition in younger and elderly adults: A study in a virtual environment.Experimental Psychology, 57( 1), 54-60.
30 Kessels R. P. C., Meulenbroek O., Fernandez G., & Olde Rikkert, M. G. M . ( 2010). Spatial working memory in aging and mild cognitive impairment: Effects of task load and contextual cueing.Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 17( 5), 556-574.
31 Laurienti P. J., Burdette J. H., Maldjian J. A., & Wallace M. T . ( 2006). Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 27( 8), 1155-1163.
32 Mahmood O., Adamo D., Briceno E., & Moffat S. D . ( 2009). Age differences in visual path integration. Behavioural Brain Research, 205( 1), 88-95.
33 Mahoney J. R., Li P. C. C., Oh-Park M., Verghese J., & Holtzer R . ( 2011). Multisensory integration across the senses in young and old adults.Brain Research, 1426, 43-53.
34 Meneghetti C., Pazzaglia F., & Beni R . ( 2015). Mental representations derived from spatial descriptions: The influence of orientation specificity and visuospatial abilities.Psychological Research, 79( 2), 289-307.
35 Miller M. & Eilam, D. ( 2011). Decision making at a crossroad: Why to go straight ahead, retrace a path, or turn sideways? Animal Cognition, 14( 1), 11-20.
36 Montefinese M., Sulpizio V., Galati G., & Committeri G . ( 2015). Age-related effects on spatial memory across viewpoint changes relative to different reference frames.Psychological Research, 79( 4), 687-697.
37 Mokrisova I., Laczo J., Andel R., Gazova I., Vyhnalek M., Nedelska Z., .. Hort J . ( 2016). Real-space path integration is impaired in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment.Behavioural Brain Research, 307, 150-158.
38 Moffat, S.D . ( 2009). Aging and spatial navigation: What do we know and where do we go? Neuropsychology Review, 19( 4), 478-489.
39 Moffat S. D., Elkins W., & Resnick S. M . ( 2006). Age differences in the neural systems supporting human allocentric spatial navigation.Neurobiology of Aging, 27( 7), 965-972.
40 Muffato V., Meneghetti C., & De Beni. R . ( 2016). Not all is lost in older adults' route learning: The role of visuo- spatial abilities and type of task.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 230-241.
41 Muffato V., Meneghetti C., Di Ruocco V., & De Beni R . ( 2017). When young and older adults learn a map: The influence of individual visuo-spatial factors.Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 114-121.
42 Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. ( 2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding.Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 173-196.
43 Peiffer A. M., Mozolic J. L., Hugenschmidt C. E., & Laurienti P. J . ( 2007). Age-related multisensory enhancement in a simple audiovisual detection task . Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 18( 10), 1077-1081.
44 Phillips, H., & Andres, P. ( 2010). The cognitive neuroscience of aging: New findings on compensation and connectivity.Cortex, 46( 4), 421-424.
45 Resnick S. M., Pham D. L., Kraut M. A., Zonderman A. B., & Davatzikos C . ( 2003). Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: A shrinking brain.The Journal of Neuroscience, 23( 8), 3295-3301.
46 Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Cappell, K.A . ( 2008). Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17( 3), 177-182.
47 Spence I. & Feng, J. ( 2010). Video games and spatial cognition.Review of General Psychology, 14( 2), 92-104.
48 Stranahan, A.M., & Mattson, M.P . ( 2010). Selective vulnerability of neurons in layer II of the Entorhinal cortex during aging and Alzheimer's disease.Neural Plasticity, 2010, 1-8.
49 Tanaka S., Young J. W., Gresack J. E., Geyer M. A., & Risbrough V. B . ( 2011). Factor analysis of attentional set-shifting performance in young and aged mice.Behavioral and Brain Functions, 7, 33.
50 Wan X., Wang R. F., & Crowell J. A . ( 2012). The effect of landmarks in human path integration.Acta Psychologica, 140( 1), 7-12.
51 Wiener J. M., Kmecova H., & de Condappa O . ( 2012). Route repetition and route retracing: Effects of cognitive aging. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 4, 1-7.
52 Zancada-Menendez C., Sampedro-Piquero P., Meneghetti C., Labate E., Begega A., & Lopez L . ( 2015). Age differences in path learning: The role of interference in updating spatial information.Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 83-89.
53 Zou Z., Chau B. K. H., Ting K. H., & Chan, C. C. H . ( 2017). Aging effect on audiovisual integrative processing in spatial discrimination task.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 374.




[1]赵鑫, 郑巧萍. 童年贫困与晚年认知老化:加速还是延缓?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 160-166.
[2]程士静, 何文广. 语义认知的习得、发展和老化及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1156-1163.
[3]霍丽娟, 郑志伟, 李瑾, 李娟. 老年人的脑可塑性:来自认知训练的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(5): 846-858.
[4]何文广. 语言认知老化机制及其神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(9): 1479-1491.
[5]何燕;余林;闫志民:赵宇晗. 认知储备的测量及其在认知老化中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(3): 430-438.
[6]李丹;杨昭宁. 空间导航:路标学习和路径整合的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(10): 1755-1762.
[7]何承林;陈传锋. 活动参与在认知损害中的延缓作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(3): 506-516.
[8]亓胜辉;余林;马建苓. 人格特质对认知老化的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2013, 21(1): 96-107.
[9]彭华茂;王大华. 基本心理能力老化的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(8): 1251-1258.
[10]于平;徐晖;尹文娟;魏曙光;于萍. 网格细胞在空间记忆中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(6): 1228-1233.
[11]付艳;王大华. 认知老化与脑:HAROLD模型之争[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(1): 86-91.
[12]赵民涛
. 物体位置与空间关系的心理表征[J]. 心理科学进展, 2006, 14(3): 321-327.
[13]卜翠萍,奚耕思. 线粒体与认知老化[J]. 心理科学进展, 2005, 13(3): 341-347.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4590
相关话题/心理 科学 空间 视觉 知识

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 为何越减越肥?——限制性饮食者过度进食的心理机制及影响因素
    王劭睿1,陈红1,2()1西南大学心理学部2认知与人格教育部重点实验室,重庆400715收稿日期:2018-03-21出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:陈红E-mail:chenhg@swu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31771237);中央高 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理韧性及其神经机制:来自非人类动物模型的证据
    刘浩然1,张晨风1,杨莉1,2()1华南师范大学心理学院2华南师范大学脑科学与康复医学研究院,广州510631收稿日期:2017-11-13出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:杨莉E-mail:yang_li@m.scnu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金( ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 组织中的韧性:基于心理路径和系统路径的保护性资源建构
    诸彦含1(),赵玉兰1,周意勇2,3,吴江11西南大学政治与公共管理学院,重庆4007152中国科学院心理研究所,北京1001013中国科学院大学,北京100049收稿日期:2018-02-26出版日期:2019-02-15发布日期:2018-12-25通讯作者:诸彦含E-mail:zhuyh@sw ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 发展性阅读障碍的视觉注意广度技能
    赵婧()首都师范大学心理学院,北京市“学习与认知”重点实验室,北京100037收稿日期:2018-04-16出版日期:2019-01-15发布日期:2018-11-23基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31500903)Skillsofvisualattentionspanindevelopment ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 社会分类的特性,维度及心理效应
    佐斌1,温芳芳1(),宋静静2,代涛涛11华中师范大学心理学院暨社会心理研究中心,青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉4300792中国地质大学应用心理研究所,武汉430070收稿日期:2017-10-18出版日期:2019-01-15发布日期:2018-11-23基金资助:*国家自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理学视角下的极端膜拜伤害问题
    任定成1,何晨宏1,2,陈天嘉1()1.中国科学院大学膜拜现象研究中心2.中国科学院大学人文学院,北京100049收稿日期:2018-05-28出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30通讯作者:陈天嘉E-mail:chentianjia@ucas.ac.cn作者简介:任定成,北京 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 《心理科学进展》2018年度审稿专家名录
    出版日期:2019-01-15发布日期:2019-01-03Online:2019-01-15Published:2019-01-03摘要/Abstract摘要:参考文献相关文章0Norelatedarticlesfound!PDF全文下载地址:http://journal.psych.ac.cn/ ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 未来自我连续性及其对个体心理和行为的影响
    刘云芝,杨紫嫣,王娱琦,陈鋆,蔡华俭()中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室;中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京100101中国科学院大学,北京100049收稿日期:2017-10-23出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30通讯作者:蔡华俭E-mail:caih ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 从“理性人”到“行为人”:公共政策研究的行为科学转向
    吕小康1,武迪1,隋晓阳1,汪新建1,程婕婷2()1.南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系,天津3003502.山东大学(威海)法学院社会工作系,威海264209收稿日期:2017-11-13出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30通讯作者:程婕婷E-mail:chengjie ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 研究争论:空间注意是否调制C1成分?
    傅世敏(),陈晓雯,刘雨琪广州大学教育学院心理系,脑与认知科学中心,广州510006收稿日期:2018-06-20出版日期:2018-11-15发布日期:2018-09-26通讯作者:傅世敏E-mail:fusm@gzhu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金资助项目(31371142)Rese ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01