), 陈凤玲1, 李斌1,2(), 刘耀中1 1 暨南大学管理学院
2 暨南大学企业发展研究所, 广州 510632
收稿日期:2017-12-13出版日期:2019-01-15发布日期:2018-11-23基金资助:* 国家自然科学基金青年项目(71701080, 71601084);广东省自然科学基金项目(2017A030313398, 2016A03 0313113);暨南大学广东省哲学社会科学重点实验室—“神经管理学实验室”(2015WSYS005)The influence of curiosity on inspiration: Phenomenon and mechanism based on cognitive and affect processes
CHEN Xiaoxi1(), CHEN Fengling1, LI Bin1,2(), LIU Yaozhong1 1 Department of Management, Jinan University
2 IThe Institute of Enterprise Development, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Received:2017-12-13Online:2019-01-15Published:2018-11-23摘要/Abstract
摘要： 当前我国经济正在从要素驱动,投资驱动转向创新驱动, 如何促进和持续创新的问题引起了学界和企业的广泛关注.现有研究发现好奇和灵感是创新的重要阶段, 灵感具有独立的心理结构和不同的过程, 又受到意识情绪的影响.研究拟从灵感产生的认知和情绪的双加工视角出发, 深入揭示灵感产生现象的本质特点和规律, 阐明好奇影响灵感的行为和脑机制.研究成果不仅可为创新的理论发展提供崭新视角,也可为企业员工和创业者创新能力的培养提供参考.
图/表 2
表1创造性思维的阶段对比
| 作者 | 阶段 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallas, 2014 | 准备 preparation | 酝酿 incubation | 明朗 illumination | 验证 verification | ||
| Mainemelis, 2010 | 准备 | 酝酿 | 明朗 | 评价 | 加工 | |
| Amabile, 2012 | 提出问题 | 准备和酝酿 | 产生反应 | 验证反应 | 评价结果 | |
| Busse & Mans- field, 1980 | 选择问题 | 投入努力 | 设置约束条件 | 改变约束条件和 重新建构问题 | 验证和阐述所提出的解决方案 | |
表1创造性思维的阶段对比
| 作者 | 阶段 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallas, 2014 | 准备 preparation | 酝酿 incubation | 明朗 illumination | 验证 verification | ||
| Mainemelis, 2010 | 准备 | 酝酿 | 明朗 | 评价 | 加工 | |
| Amabile, 2012 | 提出问题 | 准备和酝酿 | 产生反应 | 验证反应 | 评价结果 | |
| Busse & Mans- field, 1980 | 选择问题 | 投入努力 | 设置约束条件 | 改变约束条件和 重新建构问题 | 验证和阐述所提出的解决方案 | |
图1研究理论框架
图1研究理论框架参考文献 74
| 1 | 李天然, 俞国良 . (2015). 人类为什么会好奇?人际好奇的概念,功能及理论解释. 心理科学进展, 23(1),132-141. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00132URL |
| 2 | 刘亚, 周长江, 杨哈韬 . (2012). 灵感的概念,结构与功能. 心理科学进展,20(11),1834-1842. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01834URL |
| 3 | 沈伊默, 周婉茹, 魏丽华, 张庆林 . (2017). 仁慈领导与员工创新行为: 内部人身份感知的中介作用和领导-部属交换关系差异化的调节作用. 心理学报,49(8), 1100-1112. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01100URL |
| 4 | 王怀勇, 刘永芳 . (2014). 决策过程中的调节匹配效应及其机制. 心理科学,37(1), 182-189. |
| 5 | 袁媛, 沈汪兵, 施春华, 刘畅, 刘取芝, 刘昌 . (2016). 顿悟体验的心理与神经机制. 心理科学进展,24(9), 1329-1338. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01329URL |
| 6 | 张亚坤, 陈龙安, 张兴利, 施建农 . (2018). 融合视角下的西方创造力系统观. 心理科学进展,26(5), 810-830. |
| 7 | 张勇, 龙立荣 . (2013). 绩效薪酬对雇员创造力的影响: 人-工作匹配和创造力自我效能的作用. 心理学报,45(3), 363-376. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.00363URL |
| 8 | Agarwal ,R., & Karahanna E. , (2000). Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665-694. doi: 10.2307/3250951URL |
| 9 | , Amabile T.M . (2012). Componential theory of creativity.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. |
| 10 | Amabile T. M., Barsade S. G., Mueller J. S., & Staw B. M . (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367-403. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367URL |
| 11 | Amabile T. M., Conti R., Coon H., Lazenby J., & Herron M . (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. doi: 10.2307/256995URL |
| 12 | Anderson N., Poto?nik K., & Zhou J . (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297-1333. doi: 10.1177/0149206314527128URL |
| 13 | , Baumeister R.F., & Leary M.R . (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497URLpmid: 7777651 |
| 14 | Baumeister R. F., Zhang L. Q., & Vohs K. D . (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 111-121. |
| 15 | Belzak W. C. M., Thrash T. M., Sim Y. Y., & Wadsworth L. M . (2017). Beyond hedonic and eudaimonic well- being: Inspiration and the self-transcendence tradition. In M. D. Robinson & M. Eid (Eds.), The happy mind: Cognitive contributions to well-being(pp. 117-138). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58763-9_7URL |
| 16 | Berlyne D.E . (1960). McGraw-Hill series in psychology. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York:. McGraw-Hill. |
| 17 | , Berlyne D.E . (1963). Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17(3), 274-290. doi: 10.1037/h0083496URLpmid: 14048839 |
| 18 | Bledow R., Rosing K., & Frese M . (2013). A Dynamic perspective on affect and creativity, Academy and Management Journal, 56(2), 432-450. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0894URL |
| 19 | Boyd D.& Goldenberg J. , (2013). Inside the box: A proven system of creativity for breakthrough results. New York: Simon &. Schuster. |
| 20 | Busse T.V., &Mansfield R.S . (1980). Theories of the creative process: A review and a perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14(2), 91-132. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1980.tb00232.xURL |
| 21 | Carr N. . (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton &Company. |
| 22 | Csikszentmihalyi M. . (1997). Flow and creativity. Namta Journal, 22(2), 60-97. |
| 23 | Day H.I . (1971). The measurement of specific curiosity.In H. I. Day, D. E. Berlyne, & D. E. Hunt (Eds.), Intrinsic motivation: A new direction in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. |
| 24 | Day H.I., & Langevin R. (1969). Curiosity and intelligence: Two necessary conditions for a high level of creativity. The Journal of Special Education, 3(3), 263-268. doi: 10.1177/002246696900300305URL |
| 25 | Farley S.D . (2011). Is gossip power? The inverse relationship between gossip, power, and likability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 574-579. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.821URL |
| 26 | Gong Y., Wu J., Song L. J., & Zhang Z . (2017). Dual tuning in creative processes: Joint contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 829-844. doi: 10.1037/apl0000185URL |
| 27 | Gottlieb J., Oudeyer P-Y., Lopes M., & Baranes A . (2013). Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 585-593. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.001URLpmid: 4193662 |
| 28 | Han C., Li P., Warren C., Feng T., Litman J., & Li H . (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for the importance of interpersonal curiosity. Brain Research, 1500, 45-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.12.046URLpmid: 23333374 |
| 29 | Hardy III J. H., Ness A. M., & Mecca J . (2017). Outside the box: Epistemic curiosity as a predictor of creative problem solving and creative performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 230-237. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.004URL |
| 30 | Hartung F-M. . (2010). Social curiosity and its functions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universit?t Konstanz |
| 31 | Hartung F-M. & Renner B. (2011). Social curiosity and interpersonal perception: A judge × trait interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 796-814. doi: 10.1177/0146167211400618URLpmid: 21398584 |
| 32 | Hennessey B.A., &Amabile T.M . (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569-598. |
| 33 | Higgins E.T . (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280-1300. |
| 34 | Higgins E.T . (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 1-46. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0URL |
| 35 | Hirst G., Van Knippenberg D., & Zhou J . (2009). A cross- level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280-293. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308035URL |
| 36 | Kang M. J., Hsu M., Krajbich I. M., Loewenstein G., McClure S. M., Wang J. T. Y., & Camerer C. F . (2009). The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963-973. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1308286URLpmid: 19619181 |
| 37 | Kashdan T. B., McKnight P. E., Fincham F. D., & Rose P . (2011). When curiosity breeds intimacy: Taking advantage of intimacy opportunities and transforming boring conversations. Journal of Personality, 79(6), 1369-1402. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00697.xURLpmid: 3356784 |
| 38 | Kashdan T. B., Rose P., & Fincham F. D . (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8203_05URLpmid: 15151805 |
| 39 | Kashdan T. B. & Silvia, P. J. , (2009).Curiosity and interest:The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge In C R Snyder & S J Lopez (Eds), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp 367-374) USA: Oxford University Press The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 367-374) . USA: Oxford University Press. |
| 40 | , Keltner D. &Shiota M.N . (2003). New displays and new emotions: A commentary on Rozin and Cohen (2003). Emotion, 3(1), 86-91. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.3.1.86URLpmid: 12899320 |
| 41 | Kidd C. &Hayden B.Y . (2015). The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity. Neuron, 88(3), 449-460. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010URLpmid: 26539887 |
| 42 | Koo D-M. & Choi Y-Y. , (2010). Knowledge search and people with high epistemic curiosity. C omputers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.013URL |
| 43 | Kumashiro M. & Sedikides C. (2005). Taking on board liability-focused information: Close positive relationships as a self-bolstering resource. Psychological Science, 16(9), 732-739. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01603.xURLpmid: 16137260 |
| 44 | Lee R.M., &Robbins S.B . (1998). The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(3), 338-345. doi: 10.1037//0022-0167.45.3.338URL |
| 45 | Lerner J. S., Li Y., Valdesolo P., & Kassam K. S . (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799-823. |
| 46 | Levitt H. M., Williams D. C., Uruk A. C., Kannan D., Obana M., Smith B. L., .. Biss W. J . (2009). The experience of depth curiosity: The pursuit of congruence despite the danger of engulfment. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 22(3), 187-212. doi: 10.1080/10720530902915093URL |
| 47 | Li Q., Maggitti P. G., Smith K. G., Tesluk P. E., & Katila R . (2013). Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 893-916. |
| 48 | Litman J.A . (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7), 1585-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.014URL |
| 49 | Litman J. A., Collins R. P., & Spielberger C. D . (2005). The nature and measurement of sensory curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(6), 1123-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.05.001URL |
| 50 | Litman J.A., &Jimerson T.L . (2004). The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(2), 147-157. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_3URLpmid: 15041521 |
| 51 | Litman J.A., &Pezzo M.V . (2007). Dimensionality of interpersonal curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1448-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.021 |
| 52 | Loewenstein G. . (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75URL |
| 53 | Lubart T.I . (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07URL |
| 54 | Mainemelis C. (2010). Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 558-578. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2010.53502801URL |
| 55 | Menon S. & Soman D. (2002). Managing the power of curiosity for effective web advertising strategies. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 1-14. |
| 56 | Oleynick V. C., Thrash T. M., LeFew M. C., Moldovan E. G., & Kieffaber P. D . (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 436. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00436URLpmid: 4070479 |
| 57 | Peters K., Jetten J., Radova D., & Austin K . (2017). Gossiping about deviance: Evidence that deviance spurs the gossip that builds bonds. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1610-1619. doi: 10.1177/0956797617716918URLpmid: 28898164 |
| 58 | Reio T.G., &Callahan J.L . (2004). Affect, curiosity, and socialization-related learning: A path analysis of antecedents to job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1), 3-22. doi: 10.1023/B:JOBU.0000040269.72795.ce |
| 59 | Roche S.M., &McConkey K.M . (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment, and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 91-101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.91URL |
| 60 | Runco M. A. , & Dow, G.(1999). Problem finding. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds. ), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 433-435). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. |
| 61 | Sadler-smith E. . (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than meets the eye? Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342-352. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277URL |
| 62 | Stephan E., Sedikides C., Wildschut T., Cheung W.-Y., Routledge C., & Arndt J . (2015). Nostalgia-evoked inspiration: Mediating mechanisms and motivational implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1395-1410. doi: 10.1177/0146167215596985URLpmid: 26228477 |
| 63 | Thrash T.M., &Elliot A.J . (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871-889. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.871URLpmid: 12703654 |
| 64 | Thrash T.M., &Elliot A.J . (2004). Inspiration: Core characteristics, component processes, antecedents, and function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 957-973. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.957URLpmid: 15598117 |
| 65 | Thrash T. M., Maruskin L. A., Cassidy S. E., Fryer J. W., & Ryan R. M . (2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 469-487. doi: 10.1037/a0017907URLpmid: 20175625 |
| 66 | van Dijk E., & Marcel Z. (2007). When curiosity killed regret: Avoiding or seeking the unknown in decision- making under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 656-662. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.004URL |
| 67 | Van Wulfen G. (2016). Creating innovative products and services: The FORTH innovation method (pp. 103-105). London:. Routledge. |
| 68 | Wallas G..(2014). The art of thought. London: Solis Press. |
| 69 | Wang C. . (2014). What satisfies a curious mind? Curiosity prompts novel reward seeking (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of British Columbia. |
| 70 | Wang C. & Huang Y. (2018). “I Want to Know the Answer! Give Me Fish’ n’ Chips!”: The impact of curiosity on indulgent choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(5), 1052-1067. |
| 71 | Welsh G. S. , & Barron, F.(1959). Barron-Welsh art scale. Consulting Psychologists Press. |
| 72 | Wu C.-H., Parker S. K ., & de Jong, J. P. J. (2011). Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511-1534. doi: 10.1177/0149206311429862URL |
| 73 | Zeng L., Proctor R. W., & Salvendy G . (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24-37. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.545713URL |
| 74 | Zhou J., Wang X. M., Song L. J., & Wu J . (2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 180-202. doi: 10.1037/apl0000166URLpmid: 27893257 |
相关文章 15
| [1] | 张辉华. 社会网络视角的团队情绪智力[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1381-1395. |
| [2] | 李晓明, 邹是, 高友明. 失望情绪在不作为惯性产生中的作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1396-1401. |
| [3] | 张珊珊, 王婧怡, 李昱汝. 情绪自旋及其心理健康功能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1430-1437. |
| [4] | 曾宪卿, 许冰, 孙博, 叶健彤, 傅世敏. EMMN受偏差-标准刺激对类型和情绪类型影响: 来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(7): 1163-1178. |
| [5] | 王晓田, 王娜, 何金波. 前瞻性情绪作为社会风险的信息源假说：公共场景下风险决策的情绪及文化机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 959-966. |
| [6] | 彭坚, 曹兵兵. 追随者主动工作行为的上行影响：内隐追随视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 967-977. |
| [7] | 隋雪, 史汉文, 李雨桐. 语言加工过程中的观点采择及其认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(6): 990-999. |
| [8] | 何蔚祺, 李帅霞, 赵东方. 群体面孔情绪感知的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 761-772. |
| [9] | 肖承丽, 隋雨檠, 肖苏衡, 周仁来. 空间交互研究新视角：多重社会因素的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 796-805. |
| [10] | 尹俊婷, 王冠, 罗俊龙. 威胁对创造力的影响：认知与情绪双加工路径[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 815-826. |
| [11] | 王学思, 李静雅, 王美芳. 父母婚姻冲突对儿童发展的影响及其机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(5): 875-884. |
| [12] | 赵宏明, 董燕萍. 口译员的认知转换优势[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 625-634. |
| [13] | 丁琳洁, 李旭, 尹述飞. 工作记忆中的积极效应：情绪效价与任务相关性的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 652-664. |
| [14] | 关旭旭, 王红波. 抑制引起的遗忘及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 665-676. |
| [15] | 黄骐, 陈春萍, 罗跃嘉, 伍海燕. 好奇心的机制及作用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(4): 723-736. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4561
