) 北京林业大学心理学系, 北京 100083
收稿日期:2018-04-29出版日期:2019-01-15发布日期:2018-11-23基金资助:* 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2016ZCQ11)Ubiquitous harm: Moral judgment in the perspective of the theory of dyadic morality
ZHAN Ze, WU Baopei() Department of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Received:2018-04-29Online:2019-01-15Published:2018-11-23摘要/Abstract
摘要： 道德二元论认为人际伤害是道德认知的典型模板.道德判断由规范违反,消极情感,感知到的伤害结合产生, 并经由二元比较与二元完型, 完成从下至上,从上至下的认知加工.道德失声现象的产生源于混淆了主客观伤害; 电车难题剥离了道德二元模型, 有趣但可能不符合普遍的道德认知; 不同领域的道德判断皆可在二元论的框架下得到解释.未来的研究可以考虑:意图与痛苦影响道德判断的实证; 跨文化研究的开展; 统一认知系统与模块化认知系统的辩证; 伤害的人际与非人际划分以及其他相关因素的检验.
图/表 2
图1道德二元论认为不道德的基础, 是规范违反,(消极)核心情感与感知到的伤害三者的结合(Gray et al., 2017).
图1道德二元论认为不道德的基础, 是规范违反,(消极)核心情感与感知到的伤害三者的结合(Gray et al., 2017).
图2典型道德行为是二元的, 同时包含行为者(agent)和受害者(patient).电车难题被用来检验很多关于道德判断认知的争论, 但它是反二元的, 要求个体在行为者与受害者之间选择其一(Gray et al., 2014).
图2典型道德行为是二元的, 同时包含行为者(agent)和受害者(patient).电车难题被用来检验很多关于道德判断认知的争论, 但它是反二元的, 要求个体在行为者与受害者之间选择其一(Gray et al., 2014).参考文献 91
| 1 | 段蕾, 莫书亮, 范翠英, 刘华山 . (2012). 道德判断中心理状态和事件因果关系的作用:兼对道德判断双加工过程理论的检验. 心理学报,44(12), 1607-1617. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2012.01607URL |
| 2 | 李占星, 朱莉琪 . (2015). 道德情绪判断与归因:发展与影响因素. 心理科学进展,23(6), 990-999. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00990URL |
| 3 | 塔西佗 . (1981). 塔西佗《编年史》 (王以铸, 崔妙因译). 北京: 商务印书馆. |
| 4 | 王鹏, 方平, 姜媛 . (2011). 道德直觉背景下的道德决策:影响因素探究. 心理科学进展,19(4), 573-579. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.00573URL |
| 5 | 吴宝沛, 张雷 . (2012). 厌恶与道德判断的关系. 心理科学进展,20(2), 309-316. |
| 6 | 谢熹瑶, 罗跃嘉 . (2009). 道德判断中的情绪因素——从认知神经科学的角度进行探讨. 心理科学进展,17(6), 1250-1256. |
| 7 | 杨青松 . (2013). 时间距离对道德违规行为判断的影响及其作用机制(博士学位论文). 湖南师范大学. |
| 8 | 喻丰, 彭凯平, 韩婷婷, 柴方圆, 柏阳 . (2011). 道德困境之困境——情与理的辩争. 心理科学进展,19(11), 1702-1712. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01702URL |
| 9 | 张国清 . (2013). 罗尔斯难题: 正义原则的误读与批评. 中国社会科学, 39(10),22-40. |
| 10 | 张琨, 方平, 姜媛, 于悦, 欧阳恒磊 . (2014). 道德视野下的内疚. 心理科学进展,22(10), 1628-1636. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01628URL |
| 11 | 张梦圆, 苑明亮, 寇彧 . (2016). 论西方道德心理研究的新综合取向: 道德基础理论. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 253(1), 50-59. |
| 12 | Ames D.L., &Fiske S.T . (2015). Perceived intent motivates people to magnify observed harms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, of the United States of America, 112(12), 3599-3605. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501592112URLpmid: 25733850 |
| 13 | Atkinson Q.D., & Bourrat P. (2011). Beliefs about god, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(1), 41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.008URL |
| 14 | Barrett H. C., Bolyanatz A., Crittenden A. N., Fessler D. M. T., Fitzpatrick S., Gurven M ., et al. Laurence, S. (2016). Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 4688-4693. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522070113URLpmid: 27035959 |
| 15 | Berniūnas R., Dranseika V., & Sousa P . (2016). Are there different moral domains? Evidence from Mongolia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(3), 275-282. |
| 16 | Bj?rklund F., Haidt J., & Murphy S . (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Department of Psychology. Lund University. |
| 17 | Bleske-rechek A., Nelson L. A., Baker J. P., Remiker M. W., & Brandt S. J . (2010). Evolution and the trolley problem: People save five over one unless the one is young, genetically related, or a romantic partner. Journal of Social, 4(3), 115-127. doi: 10.1037/h0099295URL |
| 18 | Bloom P., & Jarudi I. (2006). The Chomsky of morality. Nature, 443(7114), 909-910. |
| 19 | Buchtel E. E., Guan Y., Peng Q., Su Y., Sang B., Chen S. X., & Bond M. H . (2015). Immorality east and west: Are immoral behaviors especially harmful, or especially uncivilized?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1382-1394. doi: 10.1177/0146167215595606URLpmid: 26253486 |
| 20 | Cameron C. D., Lindquist K. A., & Gray K . (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 371-394. doi: 10.1177/1088868314566683URLpmid: 25587050 |
| 21 | Chakroff A., Dungan J., & Young L . (2013). Harming ourselves and defiling others: What determines a moral domain? Plos One, 8(9), e74434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074434URLpmid: 24040245 |
| 22 | Chakroff A., Russell P. S., Piazza J., & Young L . (2017). From impure to harmful: Asymmetric expectations about immoral agents. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.08.001URL |
| 23 | Darwin, C. (1871/1981). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. |
| 24 | DelGaizo A.L., &Falkenbach D.M . (2008). Primary and secondary psychopathic-traits and their relationship to perception and experience of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(3), 206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.019URL |
| 25 | Descioli P., & Kurzban R. (2009). Mysteries of morality. Cognition, 112(2), 281-299. |
| 26 | Duke A.A., & Bègue L. (2015). The drunk utilitarian: Blood alcohol concentration predicts utilitarian responses in moral dilemmas. Cognition, 134, 121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.006URLpmid: 25460385 |
| 27 | Eskine K. J., Kacinik N. A., & Prinz J. J . (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295-299. doi: 10.1177/0956797611398497URLpmid: 21307274 |
| 28 | Fadda R., Parisi M., Ferretti L., Saba G., Foscoliano M., Salvago A., & Doneddu G . (2016). Exploring the role of theory of mind in moral judgment: The case of children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 523. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00523URLpmid: 4834434 |
| 29 | Fehr B., &Russell J.A . (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 425-438. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.425URL |
| 30 | FeldmanHall O., Dalgleish T., Evans D., Navrady L., Tedeschi E., & Mobbs D . (2016). Moral chivalry: Gender and harm sensitivity predict costly altruism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 542-551. doi: 10.1177/1948550616647448URLpmid: 27478541 |
| 31 | Gleichgerrcht E., & Young L. (2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. Plos One, 8(4), e60418. |
| 32 | Godin G., Conner M., & Sheeran P . (2005). Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: The role of moral norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 497-512. doi: 10.1348/014466604X17452URLpmid: 16368016 |
| 33 | Graham J., Haidt J., Koleva S., Motyl M., Iyer R., Wojcik S. P., & Ditto P. H . (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47(12), 55-130. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4URL |
| 34 | Gray H. M., Gray K., & Wegner D. M . (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619. |
| 35 | Gray K. . (2012). The power of good intentions: Perceived benevolence soothes pain, increases pleasure, and improves taste. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 639-645. doi: 10.1177/1948550611433470URL |
| 36 | Gray K., &Keeney J.E . (2015). Impure or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 859-868. doi: 10.1177/1948550615592241URL |
| 37 | Gray K., Schein C., & Cameron C. D . (2017). How to think about emotion and morality: Circles, not arrows. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.011URLpmid: 28950971 |
| 38 | Gray K., Schein C., & Ward A. F . (2014). The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(4), 1600-1615. doi: 10.1037/a0036149URLpmid: 24635184 |
| 39 | Gray K., Waytz A., & Young L . (2012). The moral dyad: A fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 206-215. |
| 40 | Gray K., &Wegner D.M . (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 505-520. doi: 10.1037/a0013748URLpmid: 19254100 |
| 41 | Gray K., &Wegner D.M . (2010). Blaming god for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 7-16. doi: 10.1177/1088868309350299URLpmid: 19926831 |
| 42 | Gray K., &Wegner D.M . (2011). To escape blame, don't be a hero — Be a victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 516-519. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.012 |
| 43 | Gray K., Young L., & Waytz A . (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101-124. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387URLpmid: 22754268 |
| 44 | Greene J., & Haidt J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517-523. |
| 45 | Greene J. D., Morelli S. A., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L. E., & Cohen J. D . (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004URLpmid: 2429958 |
| 46 | Greene J. D., Nystrom L. E., Engell A. D., Darley J. M., & Cohen J. D . (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389-400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027URLpmid: 15473975 |
| 47 | Guglielmo S., &Malle B.F . (2017). Information- acquisition processes in moral judgments of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(7), 957-971. doi: 10.1177/0146167217702375URLpmid: 28903702 |
| 48 | Haidt J. . (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834. |
| 49 | Haidt J. . (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998-1002. |
| 50 | Haidt J., Graham J. , & Ditto, P. The Volkswagen of moral psychology. Retrieved October 28, 2015, from & Ditto, P. The Volkswagen of moral psychology. Retrieved October 28, 2015, from |
| 51 | Haidt J., Mccauley C., & Rozin P . (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 701-713. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7URL |
| 52 | Hamlin J. K., Wynn K., & Bloom P . (2010). 3-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science, 13(6), 923-929. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00951.xURLpmid: 2966030 |
| 53 | Hamlin J. K., Wynn K., Bloom P., & Mahajan N . (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 108(50), 19931-19936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110306108URLpmid: 22123953 |
| 54 | Hofmann W., Wisneski D. C., Brandt M. J., & Skitka L. J . (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345(6202), 1340-1343. doi: 10.1126/science.1251560URLpmid: 25214626 |
| 55 | Hutcherson C.A., &Gross J.J . (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719-737. doi: 10.1037/a0022408URLpmid: 21280963 |
| 56 | Kawai N., Kubo K., & Kubo-Kawai N . (2014). “Granny dumping”: Acceptability of sacrificing the elderly in a simulated moral dilemma. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(3), 254-262. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12049URL |
| 57 | Laurin K., &Plaks J.E . (2014). Religion and punishment: Opposing influences of orthopraxy and orthodoxy on reactions to unintentional acts. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 835-843. doi: 10.1177/1948550614534698 |
| 58 | Levine E.E., &Schweitzer M.E . (2014). Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.005URL |
| 59 | Levine E.E., &Schweitzer M.E . (2015). Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 88-106. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.10.007URL |
| 60 | Margoni F., & Surian L. (2017). Children’s intention-based moral judgments of helping agents. Cognitive Development, 41, 46-64. |
| 61 | Marsh A.A., &Cardinale E.M . (2014). When psychopathy impairs moral judgments: Neural responses during judgments about causing fear. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 3-11. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss097URLpmid: 22956667 |
| 62 | Miller R. M., Hannikainen I. A., & Cushman F. A . (2014). Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm. Emotion, 14(3), 573-587. doi: 10.1037/a0035361URLpmid: 24512250 |
| 63 | Monroe A.E., &Malle B.F . (2017). Two paths to blame: Intentionality directs moral information processing along two distinct tracks. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 146(1), 123-133. doi: 10.1037/xge0000234URLpmid: 28054816 |
| 64 | Nichols S. . (2002). Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition, 84(2), 221-236. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00048-3URLpmid: 12175573 |
| 65 | Nobes G., Panagiotaki G., & Bartholomew K. J . (2016). The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children's and adults' moral judgments. Cognition, 157, 190-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.019URLpmid: 27649094 |
| 66 | Park G., Kappes A., Rho Y ., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2016). At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: Lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(10), 1588-1596. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsw077URLpmid: 5040918 |
| 67 | Peter D., Kelly A., & Robert K . (2012). Omissions and byproducts across moral domains. PloS One, 7(10), e46963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046963URLpmid: 23071678 |
| 68 | Pratt M. W., Golding G., Hunter W., & Sampson R . (2010). Sex differences in adult moral orientations. Journal of Personality, 56(2), 373-391. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00891.xURL |
| 69 | Rai T.S., &Fiske A.P . (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57-75. doi: 10.1037/a0021867URLpmid: 21244187 |
| 70 | Rai T.S., &Holyoak K.J . (2010). Moral principles or consumer preferences? Alternative framings of the trolley problem. Cognitive Science, 34(2), 311-321. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01088.xURLpmid: 21564214 |
| 71 | Rizzo M. T., Cooley S., Elenbaas L., & Killen M . (2018). Young children’s inclusion decisions in moral and social-conventional group norm contexts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 165, 19-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.05.006URLpmid: 28645542 |
| 72 | Royzman E., Atanasov P., Landy J. F., Parks A., & Gepty A . (2014). Cad or mad? Anger (not disgust) as the predominant response to pathogen-free violations of the divinity code. Emotion, 14(5), 892-907. doi: 10.1037/a0036829URLpmid: 24866519 |
| 73 | Royzman E. B., Kim K., & Leeman R. F . (2015). The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(4), 296-313. |
| 74 | Rozin P., Lowery L., Imada S., & Haidt J . (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574-586. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574URLpmid: 10234846 |
| 75 | Schein C., & Gray K. (2015). The unifying moral dyad: Liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1147-1163. doi: 10.1177/0146167215591501URLpmid: 26091912 |
| 76 | Schein C., & Gray K. (2016). Moralization and harmification: The dyadic loop explains how the innocuous becomes harmful and wrong. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 62-65. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2016.1111121URL |
| 77 | Schein C., & Gray K. (2017). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32-70. doi: 10.1177/1088868317698288URLpmid: 28504021 |
| 78 | Schein C., Ritter R. S., & Gray K . (2016). Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link. Emotion, 16(6), 862-876. doi: 10.1037/emo0000167URLpmid: 27100369 |
| 79 | Schnall S., Haidt J., Clore G. L., & Jordan A. H . (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096-1109. doi: 10.1177/0146167208317771URLpmid: 18505801 |
| 80 | Scott S. E., Inbar Y., & Rozin P . (2016). Evidence for absolute moral opposition to genetically modified food in the United States. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 315-324. doi: 10.1177/1745691615621275URLpmid: 27217243 |
| 81 | Shweder R. A., Much, N. C, Mahapatra, M., & Park L . (1997). The "Big Three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "Big Three" explanations of suffering. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health(pp. 119-169). New York: Routledge. |
| 82 | Sytsma J., & Machery E. (2012). The two sources of moral standing. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(3), 303-324. doi: 10.1007/s13164-012-0102-7URL |
| 83 | Theriault J., Waytz A., Heiphetz L., & Young L . (2017). Examining overlap in behavioral and neural representations of morals, facts, and preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 146(11), 1586-1605. doi: 10.1037/xge0000350URLpmid: 28805441 |
| 84 | Tisak M.S., &Jankowski A.M . (1996). Societal rule evaluations: Adolescent offenders' reasoning about moral, conventional, and personal rules. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 22(3), 195-207. |
| 85 | Trivers R.L . (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57. |
| 86 | Wagemans F., Brandt M. J., & Zeelenberg M . (2017). Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments. Emotion, 18(2), 277-289. doi: 10.1037/emo0000359URLpmid: 28872334 |
| 87 | van der Toorn J., Nail P. R., Liviatan I., & Jost J. T . (2014). My country, right or wrong: Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.003URL |
| 88 | Welch M., &Bryan J.L . (2000). Moral campaigns, authoritarian aesthetics, and escalation: An examination of flag desecration in the post-Eichman era. Journal of Crime & Justice, 23(1), 25-45. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2000.9721108URL |
| 89 | Wisneski D.C., &Skitka L.J . (2017). Moralization through moral shock: Exploring emotional antecedents to moral conviction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(2), 139-150. doi: 10.1177/0146167216676479URLpmid: 27872393 |
| 90 | Wright P. J., Tokunaga R. S., & Bae S . (2014). Pornography consumption and us adults' attitudes toward gay individuals' civil liberties, moral judgments of homosexuality, and support for same-sex marriage: Mediating and moderating factors. Communication Monographs, 81(1), 79-107. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2013.871048URL |
| 91 | Young L., & Tsoi L. (2013). When mental states matter, when they don't, and what that means for morality. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7(8), 585-604. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12044URL |
相关文章 12
| [1] | 张银花, 李红, 吴寅. 计算模型在道德认知研究中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1042-1055. |
| [2] | 严瑜, 李彤. 工作场所不文明行为受害者向实施者反转的机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(7): 1307-1318. |
| [3] | 胡晓檬, 喻丰, 彭凯平. 文化如何影响道德?文化间变异、文化内变异与多元文化的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 2081-2090. |
| [4] | 李明晖, 饶俪琳. 解释水平视角下的道德判断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430. |
| [5] | 叶红燕;张凤华. 从具身视角看道德判断[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488. |
| [6] | 吴宝沛;高树玲. 道德虚伪：一种机会主义的适应策略[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(6): 926-934. |
| [7] | 沈汪兵;刘昌. 道德伪善的心理学研究述评[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(5): 745-756. |
| [8] | 吴宝沛;张雷. 厌恶与道德判断的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2012, 20(2): 309-316. |
| [9] | 喻丰;彭凯平;韩婷婷;柴方圆;柏阳. 道德困境之困境—— 情与理的辩争[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(11): 1702-1712. |
| [10] | 杜晓晓; 郑全全. 诺布效应及其理论解释[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(1): 91-96. |
| [11] | 谢熹瑶;罗跃嘉. 道德判断中的情绪因素——从认知神经科学的角度进行探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2009, 17(6): 1250-1256. |
| [12] | 王美芳. 艾森伯格的亲社会道德理论简介[J]. 心理科学进展, 1996, 4(2): 32-36. |
PDF全文下载地址:
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4573
