删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

外源性注意与多感觉整合的交互关系

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

彭姓1, 常若松1,2, 任桂琴1(), 王爱君3, 唐晓雨1,2()
1. 辽宁师范大学心理学院
2. 辽宁省儿童青少年健康人格评定与培养协同创新中心, 大连 116029
3. 苏州大学教育学院心理学系, 苏州 215123
收稿日期:2017-10-26出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30
通讯作者:任桂琴,唐晓雨E-mail:ajwang@suda.edu.cn;2006@163.com

基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31600882);国家自然科学基金项目(31700939);国家自然科学基金项目(31471075);中国博士后基金面上项目赞助(2017M611888)

The interaction between exogenous attention and multisensory integration

PENG Xing1, CHANG Ruosong1,2, REN Guiqin1(), WANG Aijun3, TANG Xiaoyu1,2()
1. School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University
2. Liaoning Collaborative Innovation Center of Children and Adolescents Healthy Personality Assessment and Cultivation, Dalian 116029, China
3. Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
Received:2017-10-26Online:2018-12-15Published:2018-10-30
Contact:REN Guiqin,TANG Xiaoyu E-mail:ajwang@suda.edu.cn;2006@163.com






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 外源性注意与多感觉整合的交互关系是一个复杂且具有争议的研究领域, 一直以来备受研究者们关注。为了解释两者间的交互作用机制, 本文基于已有研究成果从两方面综述了外源性注意与多感觉整合的交互关系:(1)外源性注意可以通过自下而上的方式调节多感觉整合, 包括空间不确定性、感知觉敏感度和感觉通道间信号强度差异三种理论假说; (2)多感觉整合可以调节外源性注意。一方面, 来自多感觉通道的刺激能够以自下而上的方式自动整合, 整合后的多感觉通道刺激比单通道刺激具有更大的凸显性从而有效地吸引注意。另一方面, 整合后的多感觉通道刺激能够作为多感觉信号模板存储于大脑之中, 从而在任务中实现自上而下地调节注意捕获。



图1外源性注意调节多感觉整合的三种理论假说注:图中分别表示三种理论假说(空间不确定性假说, 感知觉敏感度假说, 感觉通道间信号强度差异假说)在不同SOA条件下(短SOA vs长 SOA)的结果。其中, 加粗红色字体代表基于已有研究数据得到的结果, 黑色字体代表假定结果。假说3结果分别引自Van der Stoep等(2015实验1, 2016)。
图1外源性注意调节多感觉整合的三种理论假说注:图中分别表示三种理论假说(空间不确定性假说, 感知觉敏感度假说, 感觉通道间信号强度差异假说)在不同SOA条件下(短SOA vs长 SOA)的结果。其中, 加粗红色字体代表基于已有研究数据得到的结果, 黑色字体代表假定结果。假说3结果分别引自Van der Stoep等(2015实验1, 2016)。



图2Talsma等(2005)研究的实验流程与结果图 注:内源性注意调节多感觉整合的实验流程及其结果。实验中要求被试注意屏幕中的一侧(左/右侧), 并对该空间位置上的所有目标刺激(视觉、听觉和视听觉)进行检测反应(左图)。结果显示, 内源性注意位置上的多感觉整合效应更大(右图)。
图2Talsma等(2005)研究的实验流程与结果图 注:内源性注意调节多感觉整合的实验流程及其结果。实验中要求被试注意屏幕中的一侧(左/右侧), 并对该空间位置上的所有目标刺激(视觉、听觉和视听觉)进行检测反应(左图)。结果显示, 内源性注意位置上的多感觉整合效应更大(右图)。



图3Mast等(2015, 实验1b)研究的实验流程与结果图 注:(a)任务和实验流程。图中分别表示在双通道目标(左图)和单通道目标条件(右图)下的实验流程。双通道目标由视觉刺激(红色圆形)与触觉振动刺激(图上用波浪线表示)组合而成。单通道目标只有视觉目标(绿色圆形), 从不伴随触觉振动刺激。同样, 启动项也分为双通道与单通道条件。实验中要求被试忽略启动项颜色特征, 既快又准地对目标刺激的颜色特征进行反应。(b)行为学结果。纵坐标代表相容性效应, 结果显示只有在双通道目标条件下发现双通道启动项比单通道启动项有更大的相容性效应。(引并改自Mast等(2015), copyright (2015)The Psychonomic Society.)
图3Mast等(2015, 实验1b)研究的实验流程与结果图 注:(a)任务和实验流程。图中分别表示在双通道目标(左图)和单通道目标条件(右图)下的实验流程。双通道目标由视觉刺激(红色圆形)与触觉振动刺激(图上用波浪线表示)组合而成。单通道目标只有视觉目标(绿色圆形), 从不伴随触觉振动刺激。同样, 启动项也分为双通道与单通道条件。实验中要求被试忽略启动项颜色特征, 既快又准地对目标刺激的颜色特征进行反应。(b)行为学结果。纵坐标代表相容性效应, 结果显示只有在双通道目标条件下发现双通道启动项比单通道启动项有更大的相容性效应。(引并改自Mast等(2015), copyright (2015)The Psychonomic Society.)







1 刘强, 胡中华, 赵光, 陶维东, 张庆林, 孙弘进 . ( 2010). 通道估计可靠性先验知识在早期的知觉加工阶段影响多感觉信息整合. 心理学报, 42( 2), 227-234.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00227URL
2 王慧媛, 隋洁, 张明 . ( 2016). 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用——来自意义线索的证据. 心理学报, 48( 7), 783-793.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00783URL
3 王慧媛, 张明, 隋洁 . ( 2014). 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用. 心理学报, 46( 2), 185-195.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00185URL
4 Ansorge, U., &Becker, S.I . ( 2013). Contingent capture in cueing: The role of color search templates and cue-target color relations. Psychological Research, 78( 2), 209-221.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0497-5URLpmid: 23807453
5 Atchley P., Jones S. E., & Hoffman L . ( 2003). Visual marking: A convergence of goal- and stimulus-driven processes during visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65( 5), 667-677.
doi: 10.3758/BF03194805URLpmid: 12956576
6 Barrett, D. J.K., &Katrin, K . ( 2012). Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues. Experimental Brain Research, 222( 1-2), 11-20.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8URLpmid: 22975896
7 Busse L., Katzner S., & Treue S . ( 2008). Temporal dynamics of neuronal modulation during exogenous and endogenous shifts of visual attention in macaque area MT. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105( 42), 16380-16385.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707369105URLpmid: 18922778
8 Callan A., Callan D., & Ando H . ( 2015). An fMRI study of the ventriloquism effect. Cerebral Cortex, 25( 11), 4248-4258.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu306URLpmid: 4816779
9 Calvert, G.A., &Thesen, T . ( 2004). Multisensory integration: Methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 98( 1-3), 191-205.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.018URLpmid: 15477032
10 Carrasco, M. ( 2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51( 13), 1484-1525.
11 Chamberland C., Hodgetts H. M., Vallières B. R., Vachon F., & Tremblay S . ( 2016). Pip and pop: When auditory alarms facilitate visual change detection in dynamic settings. Human Factors & Ergonomics Society Meeting , 60( 1), 284-288.
doi: 10.1177/1541931213601065URL
12 Chen K., Zhou B., Chen S., He S., & Zhou W . ( 2013). Olfaction spontaneously highlights visual saliency map. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280( 1768), 20131729.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1729URLpmid: 23945694
13 Chica A. B., Bartolomeo P., & LupiÁñez J . ( 2013). Two cognitive and neural systems for endogenous and exogenous spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 237( 1), 107-123.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.027URLpmid: 23000534
14 Chica, A.B., &LupiÁñez, J . ( 2009). Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: An inhibition of return study. Brain Research, 1278, 75-85.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.011URLpmid: 19374885
15 De Meo R., Murray M. M., Clarke S., & Matusz P. J . ( 2015). Top-down control and early multisensory processes: Chicken vs. egg. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9( 17).
doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00017URLpmid: 4347447
16 Degerman A., Rinne T., Salmi J., Salonen O., & Alho K . ( 2006). Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with fMRI. Brain Research, 1077( 1), 123-134.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.025URLpmid: 16515772
17 Donohue S. E., Green J. J., & Woldorff M. G . ( 2015). The effects of attention on the temporal integration of multisensory stimuli. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9, 32.
doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00032URLpmid: 4407588
18 Fairhall, &Macaluso . ( 2009). Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites. European Journal of Neuroscience, 29( 6), 1247-1257.
doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06688.xURLpmid: 19302160
19 Fetsch C. R., Pouget A., Deangelis G. C., & Angelaki D. E . ( 2011). Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration. Nature Neuroscience, 15( 1), 146-154.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2983URLpmid: 22101645
20 Folk C., Berenato A., & Wyble B . ( 2014). Semantic priming produces contingent attentional capture by conceptual content. Journal of Vision, 14( 10), 318.
21 Folk, C.L., &Remington, R . ( 1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 24( 3), 847-858.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.847URLpmid: 9627420
22 Gao Y. L., Li Q., Yang W. P., Yang J. J., Tang X. Y., & Wu J. L . ( 2014). Effects of ipsilateral and bilateral auditory stimuli on audiovisual integration: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 25( 9), 668-675.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000155URLpmid: 24780895
23 Giard, M., &Peronnet, F . ( 1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11( 5), 473-490.
24 Goller, F., &Ansorge, U . ( 2015). There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77( 5), 1574-1584.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0896-3URLpmid: 25832193
25 Goodhew S. C., Kendall W., Ferber S., & Pratt J . ( 2014). Setting semantics: Conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 76( 6), 1577-1589.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0686-3URLpmid: 24824982
26 Henderickx D., Maetens K., & Soetens E . ( 2012). The involvement of bottom-up saliency processing in endogenous inhibition of return. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 74( 2), 285-299.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0234-3URLpmid: 22038667
27 Ho C., Santangelo V., & Spence C . ( 2009). Multisensory warning signals: When spatial correspondence matters. Experimental Brain Research. 195( 2), 261-272.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1778-5URLpmid: 19381621
28 Hopfinger, J.B., &West, V.M . ( 2006). Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing. NeuroImage, 31( 2), 774-789.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.049URLpmid: 16490366
29 Koelewijn T., Bronkhorst A., & Theeuwes J . ( 2010). Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies. Acta Psychologica, 134( 3), 372-384.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.010URLpmid: 20427031
30 Kok P., Jehee J. F. M ., & de Lange, F. P. ( 2012). Less is more: Expectation sharpens representations in the primary visual cortex. Neuron, 75( 2), 265-270.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.034URLpmid: 22841311
31 Krause H., Schneider T. R., Engel A. K., & Senkowski D . ( 2012). Capture of visual attention interferes with multisensory speech processing. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 67.
doi: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00067URLpmid: 23325222
32 Lamy, D.F., &Árni, K . ( 2013). Is goal-directed attentional guidance just intertrial priming? A review. Journal of Vision, 13( 3), 14-14.
doi: 10.1167/13.3.14URLpmid: 23818660
33 Lavie, N. ( 2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9( 2), 75-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004URLpmid: 15668100
34 Li Q., Wu J., & Touge T . ( 2010). Audiovisual interaction enhances auditory detection in late stage: An event-related potential study. Neuroreport, 21( 3), 173-178.
doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283345f08URLpmid: 20065887
35 Li Q., Yang H., Sun F., & Wu J . ( 2015). Spatiotemporal relationships among audiovisual stimuli modulate auditory facilitation of visual target discrimination. Perception, 44( 3), 232-242.
doi: 10.1068/p7846URLpmid: 26562250
36 Li Q., Yu H., Wu Y., & Gao N . ( 2016). The spatial reliability of task-irrelevant sounds modulates bimodal audiovisual integration: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 629, 149-154.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.07.003URLpmid: 27392755
37 Luck, S.J., &Hillyard, S.A . ( 1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20( 5), 1000-1014.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.1000URLpmid: 7964526
38 Macaluso E., Noppeney U., Talsma D., Vercillo T., Hartcher-O’Brien J., & Adam R . ( 2016). The curious incident of attention in multisensory integration: Bottom- up vs. top-down. Multisensory Research, 29( 6), 557-583.
39 Mahoney J. R., Verghese J., Dumas K., Wang C., & Holtzer R . ( 2012). The effect of multisensory cues on attention in aging. Brain Research, 1472, 63-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.07.014URLpmid: 3592377
40 Martín-ArÉvalo E., Chica A. B., & LupiÁñez J . ( 2015). No single electrophysiological marker for facilitation and inhibition of return: A review. Behavioural Brain Research, 300, 1-10.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.11.030URLpmid: 26643119
41 Mast F., Frings C., & Spence C . ( 2015). Multisensory top-down sets: Evidence for contingent crossmodal capture. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77( 6), 1970-1985.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0915-4URL
42 Mast F., Frings C., & Spence C . ( 2017). Crossmodal attentional control sets between vision and audition. Acta Psychologica, 178, 41-47.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.05.011URLpmid: 28575705
43 Matusz, P.J., &Eimer, M . ( 2011). Multisensory enhancement of attentional capture in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18( 5), 904-909.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0131-8URLpmid: 21748418
44 Matusz, P.J., &Eimer, M . ( 2013). Top-down control of audiovisual search by bimodal search templates. Psychophysiology, 50( 10), 996-1009.
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12086URLpmid: 23834379
45 Meredith M. A., Nemitz J. W., & Stein B. E . ( 1987). Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors. Journal of Neuroscience, 7( 10), 3215-3229.
doi: 10.1097/00005072-199808000-00008URLpmid: 3668625
46 Miller, J. ( 2016). Statistical facilitation and the redundant signals effect: What are race and coactivation models? Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 78( 2), 516-519.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1017-zURLpmid: 26555650
47 Mishler, A Neider, M., . ( 2016). Evidence for the redundant signals effect in detection of categorical targets Journal of Vision, 16( 12), 1024.
48 Mozolic J. L., Hugenschmidt C. E., Peiffer A. M., & Laurienti P. J . ( 2008). Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration. Experimental Brain Research, 184( 1), 39-52.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1080-3URLpmid: 17684735
49 Murray M. M., Thelen A., Thut G., Romei V., Martuzzi R., & Matusz P. J . ( 2016). The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. Neuropsychologia, 83, 161-169.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.011URLpmid: 26275965
50 Ngo, M.K., &Spence, C . ( 2012). Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli. Experimental Brain Research, 221( 2), 129-136.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3153-1URLpmid: 22760584
51 Otto T. U., Dassy B., & Mamassian P . ( 2013). Principles of multisensory behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 33( 17), 7463-7474.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4678-12.2013URLpmid: 23616552
52 Pluta S. R., Rowland B. A., Stanford T. R., & Stein B. E . ( 2011). Alterations to multisensory and unisensory integration by stimulus competition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106( 6), 3091-3101.
doi: 10.1152/jn.00509.2011URL
53 Posner, M.I., &Cohen, Y . ( 1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, 32, 531-556.
54 Santangelo V., Fagioli S., & Macaluso E . ( 2010). The costs of monitoring simultaneously two sensory modalities decrease when dividing attention in space. NeuroImage, 49( 3), 2717-2727.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.061URLpmid: 19878728
55 Santangelo, V., &Spence, C . ( 2007). Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33( 6), 1311-1321.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1311URLpmid: 18085945
56 Santangelo V., Van der Lubbe, R. H., Belardinelli M. O., & Postma A . ( 2006). Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: A comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms. Experimental Brain Research, 173( 1), 40-48.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0361-6URLpmid: 16489435
57 Santangelo V., Van der Lubbe, R. H., Belardinelli M. O., & Postma A . ( 2008). Multisensory integration affects ERP components elicited by exogenous cues. Experimental Brain Research, 185( 2), 269-277.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1151-5URLpmid: 17909764
58 Senkowski D., Saint-Amour D., Gruber T., & Foxe J. J . ( 2008). Look who's talking: The deployment of visuo- spatial attention during multisensory speech processing under noisy environmental conditions. NeuroImage, 43( 2), 379-387.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.046URLpmid: 18678262
59 Senkowski D., Saint-Amour D., Höfle M., & Foxe J. J . ( 2011). Multisensory interactions in early evoked brain activity follow the principle of inverse effectiveness. NeuroImage, 56( 4), 2200-2208.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.075URLpmid: 21497200
60 Slagter H. A., Prinssen S., Reteig L. C., & Mazaheri A . ( 2016). Facilitation and inhibition in attention: Functional dissociation of pre-stimulus alpha activity, P1, and N1 components. NeuroImage, 125( 6), 25-35.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.058URLpmid: 26436713
61 Soto-Faraco S., Navarra J., & Alsius A . ( 2004). Assessing automaticity in audiovisual speech integration: Evidence from the speeded classification task. Cognition, 92( 3), B13-B23.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.005URLpmid: 15019556
62 Spence, C. ( 2010). Crossmodal spatial attention. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191( 1), 182-200.
63 Spence, C. ( 2013). Just how important is spatial coincidence to multisensory integration? Evaluating the spatial rule. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1296( 1), 31-49.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.12121URLpmid: 23710729
64 Spence, C., &Santangelo, V . ( 2009). Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues: A review. Hearing research, 258( 1-2), 134-142.
doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.2.398URLpmid: 18488658
65 Stein, B.E., &Stanford, T.R . ( 2008). Multisensory integration: Current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9( 4), 255-266.
doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2508URLpmid: 18354398
66 Stevenson R. A., Fister J. K., Barnett Z. P., Nidiffer A. R., & Wallace M. T . ( 2012). Interactions between the spatial and temporal stimulus factors that influence multisensory integration in human performance. Experimental Brain Research, 219( 1), 121-137.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3072-1URLpmid: 3526341
67 Talsma D., Doty T. J., & Woldorff M. G . ( 2007). Selective attention and audiovisual integration: Is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? Cerebral cortex, 17( 3), 679-690.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhk016URLpmid: 16707740
68 Talsma D., Senkowski D., Soto-Faraco S., & Woldorff M. G . ( 2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14( 9), 400-410.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.008URLpmid: 20675182
69 Talsma, D., &Woldorff, M . ( 2005). Selective attention and multisensory integration: Multiple phases of effects on the evoked brain activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17( 7), 1098-1114.
doi: 10.1162/0898929054475172URLpmid: 16102239
70 Tang X. Y., Wu J. L., & Shen Y . ( 2016). The interactions of multisensory integration with endogenous and exogenous attention. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 61, 208-224.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.002URLpmid: 26546734
71 Tiippana, K. ( 2014). What is the McGurk effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 5( 4), 725.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00725URLpmid: 25071686
72 Van der Burg E., Olivers C. N. L., Bronkhorst A. W., & Theeuwes J . ( 2008 b). Audiovisual events capture attention: Evidence from temporal order judgments. Journal of Vision, 8( 5), 1-10.
73 Van der Burg E., Olivers C. N. L., Bronkhorst A. W., & Theeuwes J . ( 2008 a). Pip and pop: Nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34( 5), 1053-1065.
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1053URLpmid: 18823194
74 Van der Burg E., Olivers C. N. L., Bronkhorst A. W., & Theeuwes J . ( 2009). Poke and pop: Tactile-visual synchrony increases visual saliency. Neuroscience Letters, 450( 1), 60-64.
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.11.002URLpmid: 19013216
75 Van Der Burg E., Olivers C. N. L., & Theeuwes J . ( 2012). The attentional window modulates capture by audiovisual events. PloS One, 7( 7), e39137.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039137URLpmid: 3393717
76 Van der Burg E., Talsma D., Olivers C. N. L., Hickey C., & Theeuwes J . ( 2011). Early multisensory interactions affect the competition among multiple visual objects. NeuroImage, 55( 3), 1208-1218.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.068URLpmid: 21195781
77 Van der Stoep N., Spence C., Nijboer T. C. W ., & Van der Stigchel, S. ( 2015). On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement. Acta Psychologica, 162, 20-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.010URLpmid: 26436587
78 Van der Stoep N., Van der Stigchel S ., & Nijboer, T. C. W. ( 2015). Erratum to: Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77( 2), 464-482.
79 Van der Stoep N., Van der Stigchel S., Nijboer T. C., & Spence C . ( 2016). Visually induced inhibition of return affects the integration of auditory and visual Information. Perception, 46( 1), 6-17.
doi: 10.1177/0301006616661934URLpmid: 27484341
80 Vroomen J., Bertelson P., & De Gelder B . ( 2001). The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of automatic visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 63( 4), 651-659.
81 Wu J. L., Li Q., Bai O., & Touge T . ( 2009). Multisensory interactions elicited by audiovisual stimuli presented peripherally in a visual attention task: A behavioral and event-related potential study in humans. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 26( 6), 407-413.
doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181c298b1URLpmid: 19952565
82 Wu J. L., Yang J. J., Yu Y. H., Li Q., Nakamura N., Shen Y., .. Abe K . ( 2012). Delayed audiovisual integration of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease compared with normal aged controls. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 32( 2), 317-328.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-111070URLpmid: 3746512




[1]曹思琪, 刘勋, 伍海燕. 共情可控?以自上而下视角考察共情的可调节性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(8): 1420-1429.
[2]杨晓梦, 王福兴, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 高春颍, 胡祥恩. 瞳孔是心灵的窗口吗?——瞳孔在心理学研究中的应用及测量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1029-1041.
[3]杨伟平, 李胜楠, 李子默, 郭敖, 任艳娜. 老年人视听觉整合的影响因素及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 790-799.
[4]王爱君, 黄杰, 陆菲菲, 何嘉滢, 唐晓雨, 张明. 多感觉整合中的声音诱发闪光错觉效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1662-1677.
[5]赵佩琼, 陈巍, 张静, 平贤洁. 橡胶手错觉:拥有感研究的实验范式及其应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 37-50.
[6]潘莉, 黄希庭. 时序知觉影响因素与思考[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(4): 614-624.
[7]罗霄骁, 康冠兰, 周晓林. McGurk效应的影响因素与神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1935-1951.
[8]王昊, 杨志刚. 面孔空想性错视及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1952-1960.
[9]陈一凡, 于洋澜, 刘莹. 外源性注意与视觉意识的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 39-39.
[10]张燕, 曹慧敏, 郑元杰, 任衍具. 自上而下的目标调节奖赏联结干扰项的注意定向和脱离[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 52-52.
[11]宋娟;吕勇. 自上而下的因素对掩蔽启动中自动加工过程的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(5): 766-773.
[12]周爱保;张彦驰;刘沛汝;尹玉龙;张 奋. 我是谁?——人际间多感觉刺激下的识脸错觉[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(2): 159-167.
[13]袁祥勇;黄希庭. 多感觉整合的时间再校准[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(5): 692-700.
[14]刘建刚;田捷;Kang Lee. 基于fMRI的自上而下字母加工神经机制的研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2011, 19(2): 159-165.
[15]吴燕;隋光远;曹晓华. 内源性注意和外源性注意的ERP研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(1): 71-77.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4517
相关话题/实验 心理 流程 科学 视觉

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 未来自我连续性及其对个体心理和行为的影响
    刘云芝,杨紫嫣,王娱琦,陈鋆,蔡华俭()中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室;中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京100101中国科学院大学,北京100049收稿日期:2017-10-23出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30通讯作者:蔡华俭E-mail:caih ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 从“理性人”到“行为人”:公共政策研究的行为科学转向
    吕小康1,武迪1,隋晓阳1,汪新建1,程婕婷2()1.南开大学周恩来政府管理学院社会心理学系,天津3003502.山东大学(威海)法学院社会工作系,威海264209收稿日期:2017-11-13出版日期:2018-12-15发布日期:2018-10-30通讯作者:程婕婷E-mail:chengjie ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 个人主义上升, 集体主义式微?——全球文化变迁与民众心理变化
    黄梓航1,2,3,敬一鸣1,2,3,喻丰4,古若雷1,2,3,周欣悦5,张建新3,6,蔡华俭1,2,3()1中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院心理研究所人格与社会心理研究中心,北京1001013中国科学院大学,北京1000494西安交通大学人文社会科学学院,西安71 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 积极心理干预是“新瓶装旧酒”吗?
    段文杰1(),卜禾21武汉大学社会学系,武汉4300002香港城市大学应用社会科学系,香港收稿日期:2017-12-25出版日期:2018-10-15发布日期:2018-08-27通讯作者:段文杰E-mail:duan.w@whu.edu.cn基金资助:*武汉大学人文社会科学青年****学术发展计划 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 为他人做决策:多维度心理机制与决策体验
    陆静怡*(),尚雪松华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062收稿日期:2017-12-24出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:陆静怡E-mail:jylu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71771088);上海市教育发展基金会和上 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 工作记忆表征对视觉注意的影响:基于非目标模板的视角
    李杨卓,杨旭成,高虹,高湘萍*()上海师范大学教育学院心理系,上海200234收稿日期:2017-08-28出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:高湘萍E-mail:gaoxp@shnu.edu.cnTheroleofworkingmemoryrepresentati ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础
    叶晓燕1,张得龙1,常松2,刘鸣1()1南师范大学心理学院,广州5106312东大学教育科学学院,山东烟台264025收稿日期:2017-06-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:刘鸣E-mail:liuming@scnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01