删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

汉语言语产生的语音加工单元——基于音位的研究

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

屈青青*(), 刘维琳, 李兴珊
中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
收稿日期:2017-11-03出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30
通讯作者:屈青青E-mail:quqq@psych.ac.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(31771212)

The functional unit of phonological encoding in Chinese spoken production: Study on phonemes

QU Qingqing*(), LIU Weilin, LI Xingshan
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Received:2017-11-03Online:2018-09-15Published:2018-07-30
Contact:Qingqing QU E-mail:quqq@psych.ac.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 言语产生的语音加工单元具有跨语言的特异性。在印欧语言中, 音位是语音加工的重要功能单元。音位指具体语言中能够区别意义的最小语音单位, 如“big”包含三个音位/b/, /i/, /g/。目前, 在汉语言语产生中, 对音位的研究较少。本项目拟采用事件相关电位技术, 对汉语言语产生中的音位加工进行探讨, 试图考察:在汉语言语产生中, 1)音位加工的心理现实性, 以及音位表征是否受第二语言、汉语拼音习得、拼音使用经验的影响?2)音位的加工机制是怎样的?具体而言, 音位加工的特异性、位置编码、组合方式、时间进程是怎样的?对这些问题的回答, 将有助于深化对汉语言语产生的认识, 为建立汉语言语产生计算模型提供基础; 为比较印欧语言与汉语在机制上的异同提供基础; 为制定汉语语音教育教学方法提供心理学依据。


1 黄伯荣, 廖序东 . ( 2011). 现代汉语(上册). 北京: 高等教育出版社.
2 叶蜚声, 徐通锵 . ( 2010). 语言学纲要 (第4版). 北京: 北京大学出版社.
3 张清芳 . ( 2008). 汉语单音节和双音节词汇产生中的音韵编码过程: 内隐启动范式研究. 心理学报, 40( 3), 253-262.
4 Alario F. X., Perre L., Castel C., & Ziegler J. C. ( 2007). The role of orthography in speech production revisited. Cognition, 102, 464-475.
5 Baudouin de Courtenay, J. N.( 1972) . A Baudouin de Courtenay anthology; the beginnings of structural linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
6 Blackford T., Holcomb P. J., Grainger J., & Kuperberg G. R. ( 2012). A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming. Cognition, 123( 1), 84-99.
7 Caramazza, A. ( 1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177-208.
8 Chen J. Y., Chen T. M., & Dell G. S. ( 2002). Word-form encoding in Mandarin Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 751-781.
9 Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. ( 1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
10 Damian, M. F., & Bowers, J. S. ( 2003). Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 119-132.
11 Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. ( 2007). Time pressure and phonological advance planning in spoken production. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 195-209.
12 Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. ( 2009). Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 685-712.
13 Dell, G. S. ( 1984). Representation of serial order in speech: Evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10( 2), 222-233.
14 Dell, G. S. ( 1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 96, 283-321.
15 Dell, G. S. ( 1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124-142.
16 Dell'Acqua R., Sessa P., Peressotti F., Mulatti C., Navarrete E., & Grainger J. ( 2010). ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture-word interference paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 177.
17 Garrett M. F. ( 1980). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand (pp. 263-271). New York: Academic Press.
18 Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. ( 2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.
19 Jansma B. M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A, Möller J., & Münte T. F. ( 2004). Electrophysiological studies of speech production. In T. Pechmann & C. Habel (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production (Trends in linguistics)( pp. 361-395). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
20 Jescheniak J. D., Hahne A., & Schriefers H. ( 2003). Information flow in the mental lexicon during speech planning: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 15( 3), 261-276.
21 Jodo, E., & Kayama, Y. ( 1992). Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 477-482.
22 Kureta Y., Fushimi T., & Tatsumi I. F. ( 2006). The functional unit in phonological encoding: Evidence for moraic representation in native Japanese speakers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32( 5), 1102-1119.
23 Ladefoged, P. ( 2001). Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
24 Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. ( 1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
25 Levelt W. J. M. ( 1989) . Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26 Levelt W. J. M., Roelofs A., & Meyer A. S. ( 1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
27 MacKay, D. G. ( 1972). The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 210-227.
28 Meringer, R., & Mayer, C. ( 1895). Versprechen und Verlesen: Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart, Germany: Göschen’sche Verlagshandlung.
29 Meyer, A. S. ( 1990). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 524-545.
30 Meyer, A. S. ( 1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 69-89.
31 O'Seaghdha P. G., Chen J. Y., & Chen T. M. ( 2010). Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition, 115, 282-302.
32 Qu Q. Q., Damian M. F., & Kazanina N. ( 2012). Sound- sized segments are significant for Mandarin speakers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 14265-14270.
33 Qu Q. Q., Damian M. F., & Kazanina N. ( 2013). Reply to O’Seaghdha et al.: Primary phonological planning units in Chinese are phonemically specified. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110( 1), E4.
34 Qu Q. Q., Zhang Q. F., & Damian M. F. ( 2016). Tracking the time course of lexical access in orthographic production: An event-related potential study of word frequency effects in written picture naming. Brain and Language, 159, 118-126.
35 Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. ( 2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
36 Rayner K., White S. J., Johnson R. L., & Liversedge S. P. ( 2006). Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17( 3), 192-193.
37 Read C., Zhang Y., Nie H. Y., & Ding B. Q. ( 1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic spelling. Cognition, 24, 31-44.
38 Roelofs, A. ( 1996). Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 854-876.
39 Roelofs, A. ( 1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, 249-284.
40 Roelofs, A. ( 1998). Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production: Verb-particle combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 904-921.
41 Roelofs, A. ( 2015). Modeling of phonological encoding in spoken word production: From Germanic languages to Mandarin Chinese and Japanese. Japanese Psychological Research, 57, 22-37.
42 Sasaki K. , & Gemba, H.( 1993) . Prefrontal cortex in the organization and control of voluntary movement. In T. Ono, L. R. Squire, M. E. Raiche, D. I. Perrett, & M. Fukuda (Eds.), Brain mechanisms of perception and memory: From neuron to behavior (pp. 473-496). New York: Oxford University Press.
43 Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. ( 1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial-ordering mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett( pp. 295-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44 Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. ( 1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech ( pp. 109-136). New York: Springer.
45 Trubetzkoy, N. ( 1969). Principles of phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46 van Turennout M., Hagoort P., & Brown C. M. ( 1997). Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23( 4), 787-806.
47 Verdonschot R. G., Nakayama M., Zhang Q. F., Tamaoka K., & Schiller N. O. ( 2013). The proximate phonological unit of Chinese-English bilinguals: Proficiency matters. PLoS One, 8( 4), e61454.
48 White S. J., Johnson R. L., Liversedge S. P., & Rayner K. ( 2008). Eye movements when reading transposed text: The importance of word-beginning letters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34( 5), 1261-1276.
49 You W. P., Zhang Q. F., & Verdonschot R. G. ( 2012). Masked syllable priming effects in word and picture naming in Chinese. PLoS One, 7( 10), e46595.
50 Yu M. X., Mo C., & Mo L. ( 2014). The role of phoneme in Mandarin Chinese production: Evidence from ERPs. PLoS One, 9( 9), e106486.
51 Zhang, Q. F., & Zhu, X. B. ( 2011). The temporal and spatial features of segmental and suprasegmental encoding during implicit picture naming: An event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3813-3825.




[1]顾俊娟, 石金富. 汉字位置加工和词边界效应的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(2): 191-201.
[2]伍可, 陈杰, 李雯婕, 陈洁佳, 刘雷, 刘翠红. 人声加工的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(5): 752-765.
[3]蔡笑, 张清芳. 言语运动系统中前馈和反馈控制整合加工的作用机制 *[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(4): 588-603.
[4]彭嘉熙, 赵鹿鸣, 方鹏, 曹云飞, 苗丹民, 肖玮. 睡眠剥夺对风险决策的影响机制探讨[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(11): 1789-1799.
[5]卫垌圻, 曹慧, 毕鸿燕, 杨炀. 发展性阅读障碍书写加工缺陷及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 75-84.
[6]张坤坤, 张珂烨, 张火垠, 罗文波. 面孔可信度加工的时间进程和影响因素[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(8): 1394-1403.
[7]韩海宾, 许萍萍, 屈青青, 程茜, 李兴珊. 语言加工过程中的视听跨通道整合[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 475-489.
[8]高见, 王鹏翀, 李占江. 认知行为治疗的生物学机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(3): 522-532.
[9]魏柳青, 张学民. 多目标追踪的神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(12): 2007-2018.
[10]白晓宇, TawandaS.Mutusva, 祝卓宏. PEAK关系训练系统:孤独症语言障碍康复的新方法[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(11): 1896-1905.
[11]赵婧. 发展性阅读障碍的视觉注意广度技能[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(1): 20-26.
[12]孟珠, 闫国利. 阅读任务中无关言语效应的作用机制: 干扰基于内容还是过程?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(2): 262-269.
[13]傅世敏, 陈晓雯, 刘雨琪. 研究争论:空间注意是否调制C1成分?[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1901-1914.
[14]罗霄骁, 康冠兰, 周晓林. McGurk效应的影响因素与神经基础[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 1935-1951.
[15]孟泽龙, 赵婧, 毕鸿燕. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童的视觉大细胞通路功能探究:一项ERPs研究[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(suppl.): 2-2.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4446
相关话题/心理 科学 汉语 语言 阅读

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 为他人做决策:多维度心理机制与决策体验
    陆静怡*(),尚雪松华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062收稿日期:2017-12-24出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:陆静怡E-mail:jylu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金(71771088);上海市教育发展基金会和上 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 喜欢悲伤音乐的心理机制 *
    王丁,王超,李红()深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-05-23出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 交流语言认知理论 *
    张恒超()天津商业大学法学院心理学系,天津300134收稿日期:2017-10-06出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:张恒超E-mail:zhhengch@126.com基金资助:*教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJC190029)Communicati ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基本心理需要及其满足 *
    吴才智(),荣硕,朱芳婷,谌燕,郭永玉青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,华中师范大学心理学院,人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室,武汉430079收稿日期:2017-10-17出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:吴才智E-mail:dsxq888@126.com ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 光照对社会心理和行为的影响 *
    陈庆伟1,2,汝涛涛2(),周菊燕1,李静华1,熊晓1,李笑然4,周国富2,3,4()1华南师范大学心理学院,光与身心健康研究中心,广州5106312华南师范大学,国家绿色光电子国际联合研究中心,广州5100063华南师范大学,华南先进光电子研究院,广东省光信息材料与技术重点实验室&彩色动态电子纸显 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 大数据时代心理学文本分析技术 ——“主题模型”的应用
    曹奔1;夏勉1;任志洪2,3;林秀彬1;徐升1;赖丽足1;王琪1;江光荣1(1华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079)(2福州大学应用心理学系,福州350108)(3DepartmentofCounselingPsycholo ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理学视角下的人生目标
    王彤;黄希庭(西南大学心理学部,重庆400715)收稿日期:2017-07-24出版日期:2018-04-15发布日期:2018-02-28通讯作者:黄希庭,E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cnE-mail:E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn基金资助:重庆市人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01