删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

前瞻记忆意图后效中执行错误的机制

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

黄欢, 刘博, 周晨琛, 姬鸣*()
陕西省行为与认知神经科学重点实验室, 西安 710062
收稿日期:2017-07-24出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30
通讯作者:姬鸣E-mail:jiming@snnu.edu.cn

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(71301092);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(13YJC190009);陕西师范大学理工科中央高校研究项目(GK201603127)

Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions

HUANG Huan, LIU Bo, ZHOU Chenchen, JI Ming*()
Key Lab for Behavior & Cognitive Neuroscience of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an 710062, China;
Received:2017-07-24Online:2018-09-15Published:2018-07-30
Contact:Ming JI E-mail:jiming@snnu.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 前瞻记忆意图后效是指已完成或取消的意图失活失败对当前认知任务造成的干扰。近期研究采用前瞻记忆任务范式探究意图后效的影响因素及认知机制。自发提取-抑制失败和预备性监控两种认知机制的分歧在于提取旧意图是否依赖注意资源的参与。脑成像研究也证实意图提取存在两条神经通路:自发提取通路和预备性监控提取通路。未来研究应探索兼容有意遗忘失败、旧意图再提取、抑制失败三者的研究范式以及降低执行错误的有效措施。


1 卢焕华, 王岩, 郭春彦 . ( 2010). 从ERP研究看前瞻记忆的神经基础和认知加工机制. 心理科学进展, 18( 3), 426-431.
2 卢家楣, 孙俊才, 刘伟 . ( 2008). 诱发负性情绪时人际情绪调节与个体情绪调节对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理学报, 40( 12), 1258-1265.
3 Anderson, F. T., & Einstein, G. O. ( 2017). The fate of completed intentions. Memory, 25( 4), 467-480.
4 Beck S. M., Ruge H., Walser M., & Goschke T. ( 2014). The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions. Neuropsychologia, 52, 37-50.
5 Bugg, J. M., & Scullin, M. K. ( 2013). Controlling intentions: The surprising ease of stopping after going relative to stopping after never having gone. Psychological Science, 24( 12), 2463-2471.
6 Bugg J. M., Scullin M. K., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2013). Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 3), 522-527.
7 Bugg J. M., Scullin M. K., & Rauvola R. S. ( 2016). Forgetting no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions is (sometimes) harder with age but easier with forgetting practice. Psychology and Aging, 31( 4), 358-369.
8 Burgess P. W., Dumontheil I., & Gilbert S. J. ( 2007). The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11( 7), 290-298.
9 Burgess P. W., Gonen-Yaacovi G., & Volle E. ( 2011). Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: What have we learnt so far? Neuropsychologia, 49( 8), 2246-2257.
10 Cohen A.-L., Dixon R. A., & Lindsay D. S. ( 2005). The intention interference effect and aging: Similar magnitude of effects for young and old adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19( 9), 1177-1197.
11 Cohen A.-L., Kantner J., Dixon R. A., & Lindsay D. S. ( 2011). The intention interference effect: The difficulty of ignoring what you intend to do. Experimental Psychology, 58( 6), 425-433.
12 Cona G., Bisiacchi P. S., Sartori G., & Scarpazza C. ( 2016). Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Scientific Reports, 6, 25983.
13 Cona G., Scarpazza C., Sartori G., Moscovitch M., & Bisiacchi P. S. ( 2015). Neural bases of prospective memory: A meta-analysis and the "Attention to Delayed Intention" (AtoDI) model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 52, 21-37.
14 Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. ( 2002). Control of goal- directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3( 3), 201-215.
15 Einstein G. O., McDaniel M. A., Thomas R., Mayfield S., Shank H., Morrisette N., & Breneiser J. ( 2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134( 3), 327-342.
16 Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. ( 2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186-204.
17 Gollwitzer, P. M. ( 1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54( 7), 493-503.
18 Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. ( 1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19( 5), 1211-1226.
19 Harris, L. M., & Cumming, S. R. ( 2003). An examination of the relationship between anxiety and performance on prospective and retrospective memory tasks. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55( 1), 51-55.
20 Leech, R., & Sharp, D. J. ( 2014). The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain, 137( 1), 12-32.
21 Lustig C., Hasher L., & Zacks R. T. ( 2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view". In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), The place of inhibition in cognition ( pp. 145-162). Washington: American Psychological Association.
22 Marsh R. L., Hicks J. L., & Bink M. L. ( 1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24( 2), 350-361.
23 McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. ( 2011). The neuropsychology of prospective memory in normal aging: A componential approach. Neuropsychologia, 49( 8), 2147-2155.
24 McDaniel M. A., LaMontagne P., Beck S. M., Scullin M. K., & Braver T. S. ( 2013). Dissociable neural routes to successful prospective memory. Psychological Science, 24( 9), 1791-1800.
25 McDaniel, M. A., & Scullin, M. K. ( 2010). Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition, 38( 2), 221-232.
26 Moscovitch, M. ( 1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems (pp. 269-310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27 Mullet H. G., Scullin M. K., Hess T. J., Scullin R. B., Arnold K. M., & Einstein G. O. ( 2013). Prospective memory and aging: Evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues. Psychology and Aging, 28( 4), 910-922.
28 Penningroth, S. L. ( 2011). When does the intention- superiority effect occur? Activation patterns before and after task completion, and moderating variables. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23( 1), 140-156.
29 Pink, J. E., & Dodson, C. S. ( 2013). Negative prospective memory: Remembering not to perform an action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 1), 184-190.
30 Schaper, P., & Grundgeiger, T. ( 2017). Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70( 8), 1423-1438.
31 Scullin, M. K., & Bugg, J. M. ( 2013). Failing to forget: Prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39( 3), 965-971.
32 Scullin M. K., Bugg J. M., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2012). Whoops, I did it again: Commission errors in prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 27( 1), 46-53.
33 Scullin M. K., Bugg J. M., McDaniel M. A., & Einstein G. O. ( 2011). Prospective memory and aging: Preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation in older adults. Memory & Cognition, 39( 7), 1232-1240.
34 Scullin M. K., Einstein G. O., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2009). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Memory & Cognition, 37( 4), 425-433.
35 Seeley W. W., Menon V., Schatzberg A. F., Keller J., Glover G. H., Kenna H., … Greicius M. D. ( 2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27( 9), 2349-2356.
36 Shenhav A., Botvinick M. M., & Cohen J. D. ( 2013). The Expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79( 2), 217-240.
37 Smith, R. E. ( 2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29( 3), 347-361.
38 Walser M., Fischer R., & Goschke T. ( 2012). The failure of deactivating intentions: Aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38( 4), 1030-1044.
39 Walser M., Goschke T., & Fischer R. ( 2014). The difficulty of letting go: Moderators of the deactivation of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 78( 4), 574-583.
40 Walser M., Goschke T., Möschl M., & Fischer R. ( 2017). Intention deactivation: Effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 81( 5), 961-981.
41 Walser M., Plessow F., Goschke T., & Fischer R. ( 2014). The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 78( 4), 584-596.




[1]王葛彤, 席洁, 陈霓虹, 黄昌兵. 双眼视差的神经机制与知觉学习效应[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 56-69.
[2]郭滢, 龚先旻, 王大华. 错误记忆产生的认知与神经机制:信息加工视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 79-92.
[3]刘启鹏, 赵小云, 王翠艳, 徐艺雅, 王淑燕. 反刍思维与注意脱离损坏的关系及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2021, 29(1): 102-111.
[4]翁纯纯, 王宁. 时距知觉的动物研究范式及相关神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(9): 1478-1492.
[5]杨晓梦, 王福兴, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 高春颍, 胡祥恩. 瞳孔是心灵的窗口吗?——瞳孔在心理学研究中的应用及测量[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1029-1041.
[6]程士静, 何文广. 语义认知的习得、发展和老化及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(7): 1156-1163.
[7]张晶晶, 梁啸岳, 陈伊笛, 陈庆荣. 音乐句法加工的认知机制与音乐结构的影响模式[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(6): 883-892.
[8]杨国春, 伍海燕, 齐玥, 刘勋. 人类性别加工的认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2008-2017.
[9]李灵, 侯晓旭, 张亚, 隋雪. 食物线索注意偏向及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2040-2051.
[10]岳童, 黄希庭, 徐颖, 潘思存. 价值观的稳定性与可变性:基于认知神经科学的视角[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(12): 2091-2101.
[11]王鑫, 杭明丽, 梁丹丹. 动词论元结构复杂性加工的认知神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 62-74.
[12]陈晓雯, 蔡文淑, 谢桐, 傅世敏. 孤独症谱系障碍者视觉定向与视觉搜索的特点及神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(1): 98-109.
[13]陈圣栋, 陈永强, 高伟, 罗利, 杨洁敏, 袁加锦. 认知加工的自动化现象:从二分法到渐进观[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(9): 1556-1563.
[14]李莹, 张灿, 王悦. 道德情绪在道德隐喻映射中的作用及其神经机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1224-1231.
[15]朱朝霞, 刘丽, 崔磊, 彭聃龄. 书写对阅读的影响——来自传统书写与电脑打字的证据[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(5): 796-803.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4452
相关话题/科学 心理 神经 音乐 视觉

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 工作记忆表征对视觉注意的影响:基于非目标模板的视角
    李杨卓,杨旭成,高虹,高湘萍*()上海师范大学教育学院心理系,上海200234收稿日期:2017-08-28出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:高湘萍E-mail:gaoxp@shnu.edu.cnTheroleofworkingmemoryrepresentati ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基于知觉的恐惧泛化的认知神经机制
    雷怡1,2,3(),梅颖1,2,3,张文海4,李红1,2,31深圳大学心理与社会学院2深圳市情绪与社会认知科学重点实验室3深圳市神经科学研究院,深圳5180004江苏省盐城工学院心理健康教育中心,盐城224003收稿日期:2017-02-23出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-0 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 啮齿动物主动母性行为动态改变的神经机制
    张一帆1,齐星亮2,蔡厚德1,2()1南京师范大学心理学院,南京2100972南京晓庄学院幼儿师范学院,南京211171收稿日期:2017-06-06出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:蔡厚德E-mail:caihoude@163.com基金资助:国家社科基金教育学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 自闭症谱系障碍者抑制控制的影响因素及神经机制
    孙岩1(),房林1,王亭予1,崔丽21辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连1160292大连小海豚自闭症儿童康复中心,大连116000收稿日期:2017-05-31出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:孙岩E-mail:sun9199@163.com基金资助:教育部人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 手写体文字识别的特点及神经机制
    任晓倩1,方娴1,隋雪1(),吴岩2()1宁师范大学心理学院;儿童青少年健康人格评定与培养协同创新中心,大连1160292北师范大学心理学院,长春130024收稿日期:2017-09-27出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:隋雪,吴岩E-mail:suixue88@ ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 早期应激对情绪调节的影响及其神经机制
    张慧会,张亮()中国科学院大学心理学系,北京100049收稿日期:2016-09-12出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:张亮E-mail:zhangl@psych.ac.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金通用技术基础研究联合基金重点支持项目《基于脑机接口的情绪识别与交 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 视觉表象个体差异及其神经基础
    叶晓燕1,张得龙1,常松2,刘鸣1()1南师范大学心理学院,广州5106312东大学教育科学学院,山东烟台264025收稿日期:2017-06-20出版日期:2018-07-15发布日期:2018-05-29通讯作者:刘鸣E-mail:liuming@scnu.edu.cn基金资助:国家自然科学基金 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01