删除或更新信息,请邮件至freekaoyan#163.com(#换成@)

自主任务转换中的重构和干扰

本站小编 Free考研考试/2022-01-01

蒋浩*()
中国民用航空飞行学院航空人因与工效学研究所, 四川 广汉 618307
收稿日期:2018-02-11出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30
通讯作者:蒋浩E-mail:huban@zju.edu.cn

基金资助:中国民用航空飞行学院科研项目(J2014-06)

Reconfiguration and interference in voluntary task switching

JIANG Hao*()
Institute of Aviation Human Factors and Ergonomics, Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan 618307, China
Received:2018-02-11Online:2018-09-15Published:2018-07-30
Contact:Hao JIANG E-mail:huban@zju.edu.cn






摘要/Abstract


摘要: 任务转换是研究执行功能的常用范式。任务转换通常伴随着转换代价:执行转换任务比重复任务的反应时更长、错误率更高。转换代价可能反映了任务设置重构(重构理论), 也可能表明任务之间存在干扰(干扰理论)。与任务线索范式相比, 自主任务转换范式更具生态效度, 而且不仅能获得转换代价这个传统结果, 还引入了任务选择比例、任务转换率等新指标, 其结果倾向于支持重构理论。此外, 新近研究指出自主任务转换可能也包含干扰的作用。未来, 应通过进一步改进实验范式等方法, 实现两大理论的融合。


1 刘丽婷 . ( 2016). 恐惧和愤怒对认知控制的影响. 心理学探新, 36, 31-35.
2 孙天义, 肖鑫, 郭春彦 . ( 2007). 转换加工研究回顾. 心理科学进展, 15, 761-767.
3 王振宏, 刘亚, 蒋长好 . ( 2013). 不同趋近动机强度积极情绪对认知控制的影响. 心理学报, 45, 546-555.
4 Allport A., Styles E. A., & Hsieh, S.( 1994). Shifting attentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C Umiltà & M Moscovitch (Eds), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5 Allport A., & Wylie, G. ( 2000) . Task switching, stimulus- response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 36-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6 Altmann, E. M. ( 2004). The preparation effect in task switching: Carryover of SOA. Memory & Cognition, 32, 153-163.
7 Arrington, C. M. ( 2008). The effect of stimulus availability on task choice in voluntary task switching. Memory & Cognition, 36, 991-997.
8 Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. ( 2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15, 610-615.
9 Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. ( 2005). Voluntary task switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 683-702.
10 Arrington C. M., Logan G. D., & Schneider D. W. ( 2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there "true" task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 484-502.
11 Arrington, C. M., & Reiman, K. M. ( 2015). Task frequency influences stimulus-driven effects on task selection during voluntary task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1089-1095.
12 Arrington, C. M., & Weaver, S. M. ( 2015). Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: Use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 664-679.
13 Arrington C. M., Weaver S. M., & Pauker R. L. ( 2010). Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1060-1067.
14 Arrington, C. M., & Yates, M. M. ( 2009). The role of attentional networks in voluntary task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 660-665.
15 Botvinick, M., & Braver, T. ( 2015). Motivation and cognitive control: From behavior to neural mechanism. Annual Review of Psychology, 66( 1), 83-113.
16 Braem, S. ( 2017). Conditioning task switching behavior. Cognition, 166, 272-276.
17 Braun, D. A., & Arrington, C. M. ( 2018). Assessing the role of reward in task selection using a reward-based voluntary task switching paradigm. Psychological Research, 82, 54-64.
18 Chen, P. Y., & Hsieh, S. ( 2013). When the voluntary mind meets the irresistible event: Stimulus-response correspondence effects on task selection during voluntary task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1195-1205.
19 Demanet, J., & Liefooghe, B. ( 2014). Component processes in voluntary task switching. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 843-860.
20 Demanet J., Verbruggen F., Liefooghe B., & Vandierendonck A. ( 2010). Voluntary task switching under load: Contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behavior. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 387-393.
21 Dignath D., Kiesel A., & Eder A. B. ( 2015). Flexible conflict management: Conflict avoidance and conflict adjustment in reactive cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 975-988.
22 Dunn T. L., Lutes D. J. C., & Risko E. F. ( 2016). Metacognitive evaluation in the avoidance of demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1372-1387.
23 Forstmann B. U., Brass M., Koch I., & von Cramon, D. Y. ( 2006). Voluntary selection of task sets revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 388-398.
24 Forstmann B. U., Ridderinkhof K. R., Kaiser J., & Bledowski C. ( 2007). At your own peril: An ERP study of voluntary task set selection processes in the medial frontal cortex. C ognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 286-296.
25 Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. ( 2016). How sequential changes in reward magnitude modulate cognitive flexibility: Evidence from voluntary task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 285-295.
26 Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. ( 2017). Keep flexible-Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching. Cognition, 162, 48-53.
27 Gollan T. H., Kleinman D., & Wierenga C. E. ( 2014). What’s easier: Doing what you want, or being told what to do? Cued versus voluntary language and task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2167-2195.
28 Hardy, M., & Gillan, D. J. ( 2012, September). Voluntary task switching patterns in everyday tasks of different motivational levels. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 2128-2132). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
29 Hübner, R., & Druey, M. D. ( 2006). Response execution, selection, or activation: What is sufficient for response- related repetition effects under task shifting? Psychological Research, 70, 245-261.
30 Kiesel A., Steinhauser M., Wendt M., Falkenstein M., Jost K., Philipp A. M., & Koch I. ( 2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874.
31 Kleinsorge, T., & Scheil, J. ( 2015). Effects of reducing the number of candidate tasks in voluntary task switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1555.
32 Koch I., Gade M., Schuch S., & Philipp A. M. ( 2010). The role of inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17( 1), 1-14.
33 Kool, W., & Botvinick, M. ( 2014). A labor/leisure tradeoff in cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 131-141.
34 Liefooghe, B. ( 2017). The contribution of task-choice response selection to the switch cost in voluntary task switching. Acta Psychologica, 178, 32-40.
35 Liefooghe B., Demanet J., & Vandierendonck A. ( 2009). Is advance reconfiguration in voluntary task switching affected by the design employed? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 850-857.
36 Liefooghe B., Demanet J., & Vandierendonck A. ( 2010). Persisting activation in voluntary task switching: It all depends on the instructions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 381-386.
37 Lien, M.-C., & Ruthruff, E. ( 2008). Inhibition of task set: Converging evidence from task choice in the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1111-1116.
38 Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. ( 2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
39 Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. ( 2004). Very clever homunculus: Compound stimulus strategies for the explicit task-cuing procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 832-840.
40 Masson, M. E. J., & Carruthers, S. ( 2014). Control processes in voluntary and explicitly cued task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1944-1958.
41 Mayr, U., & Bell, T. ( 2006). On how to be unpredictable: Evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science, 17, 774-780.
42 Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. ( 2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
43 Meiran, N. ( 1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
44 Meiran N., Kessler Y., & Adi-Japha E. ( 2008). Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): A theoretical framework for task switching. Psychological Research, 72, 473-500.
45 Mittelstädt V., Dignath D., Schmidt-Ott M., & Kiesel A. ( 2018). Exploring the repetition bias in voluntary task switching. Psychological Research, 82( 1), 78-91.
46 Monsell, S. ( 2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7( 3), 134-140.
47 Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. ( 2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493-516.
48 Orr, J. M., & Weissman, D. H. ( 2011). Succumbing to bottom-up biases on task choice predicts increased switch costs in the voluntary task switching paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 31.
49 Perlman A., Pothos E. M., Edwards D. J., & Tzelgov J. ( 2010). Task-relevant chunking in sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 649-661.
50 Rangelov D., Töllner T., Müller H. J., & Zehetleitner M. ( 2013). What are task-sets: A single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 524.
51 Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. ( 2006). Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: Switching tasks in sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 623-640.
52 Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. ( 2007). Task switching versus cue switching: Using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 370-378.
53 Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. ( 2015). Chunking away task-switch costs: A test of the chunk-point hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 884-889.
54 Umemoto, A., & Holroyd, C. B. ( 2015). Task-specific effects of reward on task switching. Psychological Research, 79, 698-707.
55 van Loy B., Liefooghe B., & Vandierendonck A. ( 2010). Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: Cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1916-1935.
56 Vandierendonck A., Demanet J., Liefooghe B., & Verbruggen F. ( 2012). A chain-retrieval model for voluntary task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 241-283.
57 Vandierendonck A., Liefooghe B., & Verbruggen F. ( 2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626.
58 Weaver S. M., Foxe J. J., Shpaner M., & Wylie G. R. ( 2014). You can't always get what you want: The influence of unexpected task constraint on voluntary task switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2247-2259.
59 Yeung, N. ( 2010). Bottom-up influences on voluntary task switching: The elusive homunculus escapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 348-362.




[1]梁静, 阮倩男, 李贺, 马梦晴, 颜文靖. 认知负荷取向下基于记忆-反应冲突的欺骗检测[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1619-1630.
[2]龚艳萍, 陈卓, 谢菊兰, 谢笑春. 手机冷落行为的前因、后果与作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(7): 1258-1267.
[3]张斌, 刘莹. 急性有氧运动对认知表现的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(6): 1058-1071.
[4]王梓宇, 孔子叶, 朱荣娟, 游旭群. 任务转换训练和执行功能可塑性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2019, 27(10): 1667-1676.
[5]康丹, 曾莉. 早期儿童数学学习与执行功能的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(9): 1661-1669.
[6]王晨茜, 陈天勇, 韩布新. 前额叶在老年阶段的可塑性及相关机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2018, 26(11): 2003-2012.
[7]李明英, 吴惠宁, 蒯曙光, 张畅芯. 虚拟现实技术在执行功能评估中的应用[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(6): 933-942.
[8]陈杰, 刘雷, 王蓉, 沈海洲. 音乐训练对执行功能的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(11): 1854-1864.
[9]杨玲, 王莎, 苏波波, 李少玫, 曹华. 奖赏对海洛因成瘾者执行功能的影响机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(11): 1888-1897.
[10]赵丽波, 张悦, 于祎雯, 邓丽芳. 提取引起的遗忘的认知机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2017, 25(10): 1738-1748.
[11]赵鑫; 贾丽娜;昝香怡. 干扰控制的训练:内容、效果与机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(6): 900-908.
[12]骆元静;杜旌. 组织变革前非正式信息的作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2016, 24(12): 1819-1828.
[13]王天宇;王明怡. 睡眠对儿童执行功能的影响[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(9): 1560-1567.
[14]易显林;王明怡;王小春. 执行功能与儿童流行性肥胖的关系[J]. 心理科学进展, 2015, 23(11): 1920-1930.
[15]李瑜;丁树良;唐小娟. 多项选择题认知诊断潜能的最大化[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 866-880.





PDF全文下载地址:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/CN/article/downloadArticleFile.do?attachType=PDF&id=4455
相关话题/心理 科学 干扰 控制 中国民用航空飞行学院

  • 领限时大额优惠券,享本站正版考研考试资料!
    大额优惠券
    优惠券领取后72小时内有效,10万种最新考研考试考证类电子打印资料任你选。涵盖全国500余所院校考研专业课、200多种职业资格考试、1100多种经典教材,产品类型包含电子书、题库、全套资料以及视频,无论您是考研复习、考证刷题,还是考前冲刺等,不同类型的产品可满足您学习上的不同需求。 ...
    本站小编 Free壹佰分学习网 2022-09-19
  • 舌尖上的“自虐”——食辣中的心理学问题
    傅于玲1,2,邓富民1,*(),杨帅3,徐玖平11四川大学商学院,成都6100412成都理工大学心理健康教育中心,成都6100593重庆邮电大学教育发展研究院,重庆400065收稿日期:2017-10-16出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:邓富民E-mail:de ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 数字效应对消费者行为的影响及其心理机制
    吴莹皓,蒋晶*()中国人民大学商学院,北京100872收稿日期:2017-08-02出版日期:2018-09-15发布日期:2018-07-30通讯作者:蒋晶E-mail:jiangjing@rmbs.ruc.edu.cnThenumerosityeffectsinconsumerbehaviorW ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 自闭症谱系障碍者抑制控制的影响因素及神经机制
    孙岩1(),房林1,王亭予1,崔丽21辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连1160292大连小海豚自闭症儿童康复中心,大连116000收稿日期:2017-05-31出版日期:2018-08-15发布日期:2018-07-02通讯作者:孙岩E-mail:sun9199@163.com基金资助:教育部人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 冲突解决过程中认知控制的注意调节机制 *
    李政汉1,2,杨国春1,2,南威治3,李琦1,2,刘勋1,2()1中国科学院行为科学重点实验室,北京1001012中国科学院大学,北京1000493广州大学教育学院心理系脑与认知科学中心,广州510006收稿日期:2017-07-21出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 语言认知神经科学研究中的脑沟形态分析 *
    崔新1,苏萌萌2,舒华1()1北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京1008752首都师范大学初等教育学院,北京100048收稿日期:2017-02-22出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:舒华E-mail:shuhua@bnu.edu.cn基金资助:* ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 喜欢悲伤音乐的心理机制 *
    王丁,王超,李红()深圳大学心理与社会学院,深圳518060收稿日期:2017-05-23出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:李红E-mail:lihongszu@szu.edu.cn基金资助:*国家自然科学基金项目(31671150);广东省普通高校创新团队建设项 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 基本心理需要及其满足 *
    吴才智(),荣硕,朱芳婷,谌燕,郭永玉青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,华中师范大学心理学院,人的发展与心理健康湖北省重点实验室,武汉430079收稿日期:2017-10-17出版日期:2018-06-10发布日期:2018-04-28通讯作者:吴才智E-mail:dsxq888@126.com ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 光照对社会心理和行为的影响 *
    陈庆伟1,2,汝涛涛2(),周菊燕1,李静华1,熊晓1,李笑然4,周国富2,3,4()1华南师范大学心理学院,光与身心健康研究中心,广州5106312华南师范大学,国家绿色光电子国际联合研究中心,广州5100063华南师范大学,华南先进光电子研究院,广东省光信息材料与技术重点实验室&彩色动态电子纸显 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 大数据时代心理学文本分析技术 ——“主题模型”的应用
    曹奔1;夏勉1;任志洪2,3;林秀彬1;徐升1;赖丽足1;王琪1;江光荣1(1华中师范大学心理学院暨湖北省人的发展与心理健康重点实验室,青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室,武汉430079)(2福州大学应用心理学系,福州350108)(3DepartmentofCounselingPsycholo ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01
  • 心理学视角下的人生目标
    王彤;黄希庭(西南大学心理学部,重庆400715)收稿日期:2017-07-24出版日期:2018-04-15发布日期:2018-02-28通讯作者:黄希庭,E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cnE-mail:E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn基金资助:重庆市人文社会科学 ...
    本站小编 Free考研考试 2022-01-01